TRUMP CHARGES DISMISSED, Federal Prosecutor May Face Criminal CHARGES w/Dudley Brown

Summary

Timcast IRL: Episode Summary Episode Title: TRUMP CHARGES DISMISSED, Federal Prosecutor May Face Criminal CHARGES w/Dudley Brown
Release Date: November 26, 2024
Host: Tim Pool
Guests: Dudley Brown, Ronnie Adkins

---

1. Dismissal of Donald Trump's Federal Charges

Key Points:

• Dismissal Details: Tim Pool announced that federal charges against Donald Trump have been dismissed by Judge Eileen Cannon at the request of Special Counsel Jack Smith. The dismissal is "without prejudice," indicating potential future prosecutions once Trump leaves office.

• Potential Backlash: Pam Bondi, Trump's chosen Attorney General, has vowed to prosecute the prosecutors involved in Trump's case, hinting at possible legal actions against Jack Smith and others involved in the investigation.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool [00:09]: "The charges against Donald Trump at the federal level have been dismissed... They may be dismissed, but they want to play ball."
• Tim Pool [05:50]: "Pam Bondi called the prosecutors... members of the deep state, spreading a false conspiracy theory..."

---

2. Axios CEO's Critique of X (Formerly Twitter)

Key Points:

• Viral Clip: A clip from Axios featuring their CEO criticizing X by stating "X is not the news," which has since gone viral.

• Timcast Media's Response: Tim Pool highlights the irony, noting that Timcast Media's viewership surpasses Axios by threefold, effectively mocking Axios's stance.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool [00:09]: "...we got this viral clip from Axios where the CEO is screaming about how X is not the news. How dare you."

---

3. Secession Movements in California and Illinois

Key Points:

• Rural Secession Votes: Rural counties in California and Illinois are voting to secede from their respective states, driven by dissatisfaction with metropolitan areas like Cook County (Chicago).

• Impact on Illinois: A significant 73% of Illinois voters in these rural counties support secession, aiming to distance themselves from political and economic influences centered in Chicago.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool [02:09]: "Rural counties in California and Illinois are voting to secede from their states... 73% of people are in favor of seceding because they don't like Cook county."

---

4. Gun Rights Discussion with Dudley Brown and Ronnie Adkins

Key Points:

• Guest Introductions: Dudley Brown, President of the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), and Ronnie Adkins, Industry Relations Director at NAGR, discuss the state of gun rights in America.

• Current Issues: The conversation covers the dismissal of Trump's charges, potential legal repercussions for prosecutors, and broader themes of government overreach and constitutional rights.

• Media Representation: The group critiques mainstream media's portrayal of Trump's statements, emphasizing perceived misrepresentations and biases.

Notable Quotes:

• Dudley Brown [02:08]: "We're the largest gun rights group in America since obviously the NRA isn't a gun rights group."
• Ronnie Adkins [02:44]: "I'm the vice president of Funker 530 and it's a little tough to follow that. I'm not sure what I'm doing here."

---

5. Media Bias and Misrepresentation

Key Points:

• Misquoted Statements: Tim Pool criticizes mainstream media for inaccurately portraying Trump's statements, such as falsely claiming he called for the termination of the Constitution.

• Example Analysis: A specific example from CNN is dissected, where a misleading headline distorts Trump's actual words about election integrity and potential constitutional overhauls.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool [12:00]: "What Trump actually said... 'Do you throw up the presidential election results of 2020 out?'"
• Phil Labonte [13:41]: "When it comes to having faith in the institution, I agree it's important..."

---

6. Economic Policies and Tariffs

Key Points:

• Trump's Tariff Plans: Discussion on Trump's pledge to impose 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and deeper tariffs on China, aiming to protect American industries and address issues like drug trafficking.

• Economic Implications: The panel debates the potential impact of these tariffs on American consumers, manufacturing, and relations with trade partners.

• Historical Context: Comparisons are made to past tariff implementations during Trump's first term, noting previous effects on industries and subsequent policy reversals.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool [34:50]: "Donald Trump was talking about potentially getting rid of the income tax in favor of tariffs. Like it was way, way back in the day."
• Dudley Brown [35:03]: "Supply side economics... it's like going to Las Vegas saying I lost on the roulette wheel..."

---

7. Union Critiques and Collective Bargaining

Key Points:

• Union Practices: The guests express skepticism about unions, labeling them as hindrances to economic competitiveness due to increased labor costs and rigid bargaining structures.

• Alternative Approaches: Discussions on how collective bargaining outside of formal unions can function within market norms, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and meritocracy.

Notable Quotes:

• Dudley Brown [48:36]: "Collective bargaining is basically a bizarre concept. You cannot be a professional and collectively bargain because it's not a meritocracy."
• Phil Labonte [13:58]: "I'm pretty sure it's legal to do that. And since, you know, politicians lie, I lose faith in the industry."

---

8. Military Policies and Transgender Service Members

Key Points:

• Proposed Discharges: Trump plans to issue an executive order to medically discharge 15,000 transgender service members, affecting their military careers.

• Panel Discussion: The guests debate the implications of such policies on military cohesion, unit effectiveness, and recruitment, expressing concerns about the increased politicization of the armed forces.

Notable Quotes:

• Phil Labonte [67:27]: "The controversial order would cause as many as 15,000 to be medically discharged."
• Ronnie Adkins [75:49]: "I think there are going to be some individuals in that 15,000 that absolutely could be a part of fulfilling a mission."

---

9. Sports Mascots and Cultural Sensitivity

Key Points:

• Redskins Logo Revamp: Washington Commanders agree to "uncancel" their former Redskins logo, reversing previous changes made due to cultural sensitivity concerns.

• Broader Implications: The panel critiques the inconsistency in media and corporate approaches to sports mascots, highlighting perceived double standards and the erosion of genuine cultural respect.

Notable Quotes:

• Phil Labonte [84:43]: "Chief Wahoo was mine. I'm Cleveland guy Akron."
• Tim Pool [93:05]: "So they have the same logo. I'm like, bro, it's done."

---

10. Second Amendment and Gun Legislation

Key Points:

• Second Amendment Interpretation: Extensive discussion on the scope of the Second Amendment, debating whether it pertains solely to small arms or extends to more powerful weaponry.

• Supreme Court's Role: The conversation touches upon recent Supreme Court cases (e.g., Heller, Bruen) and their potential to reshape gun legislation, emphasizing the need for clear judicial interpretations.

Notable Quotes:

• Dudley Brown [114:17]: "The Second Amendment was written to protect the rights of individuals for small arms."
• Tim Pool [121:54]: "If you're going to keep making these claims, it's government doing this."

---

11. Closing Remarks and Calls to Action

Key Points:

• Membership Promotion: Tim Pool encourages listeners to join the members-only portion of the show for in-depth discussions on gun rights and related topics.

• Engagement: Guests promote their respective organizations and urge listeners to participate in advocacy and support their efforts.

Notable Quotes:

• Tim Pool [125:17]: "We got to hold people accountable from both parties and they can't get away with just saying things and pushing things..."

---

Conclusion: This episode of Timcast IRL delves deep into the political and cultural controversies surrounding Donald Trump’s legal challenges, media biases, gun rights, economic policies, and societal shifts. Through candid discussions with experts like Dudley Brown and Ronnie Adkins, the show offers a critical perspective on government actions, media representation, and the ongoing debates shaping American society today.

Transcript

[Tim Pool]

The charges against Donald Trump at the federal level have been dismissed. Jack Smith filed to drop them. The judge agreed they're dismissed. However, they're dismissed without prejudice, meaning it sounds like they are hoping they can charge Trump again once he leaves office. So they may be dismissed, but they want to play ball. Pam Bondi said she's gonna prosecute the bad prosecutor, so maybe they go after Jack Smith. I don't know what's gonna happen, but things could get particularly spicy. So we'll talk about that then. We got this viral clip from Axios where the CEO is screaming about how X is not the news. How dare you. And everyone's making fun of them because their viewership is in the gutter. Turns out Tim Cast media is three times the size of Axios. Sorry, guys. Hope that investment paid out. And then we've got big news. This is actually from a week ago, but it's been getting bigger with more outlets picking up the story. Rural counties in California and Illinois are voting to secede from their states. Now, the biggest impact, of course, is Illinois, where 73% of people are in favor of seceding because they don't like Cook county, which is basically Chicago, which is pretty interesting. And as always, head over to cast brew.com until midnight tonight, I believe still in effect. Let's see. Let's make sure that it is. There should be the Thanksgiving discount. There it is. Look at that. I clicked the bag for Alex Stein's Primetime Grind. There is a discount on everything, 30% off because we wanted to make sure you guys could get your coffee in time for Thanksgiving. So if you buy, literally, as this show is live, you. I'm not. It's not a guarantee. I don't know. But we're gonna give you that discount, and hopefully it does make it to you by Thanksgiving. And we thought it would be a delicious treat for all of you guys who like Casper coffee, Appalachian nights, of course, everybody's favorite. And as always, head over to timcast.com click join us to become a member and support our work directly. And you'll get access to the uncensored members only show. And we're gonna be talking a lot about guns. We're gonna be talking into. We're gonna get into the deep lore of guns because our guest here was written. Was here when it was written. So would you like to introduce yourself, sir?

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah. Dudley Brown. I'm the president of the national association for Gun Rights. We're the largest gun rights group in America since obviously the NRA isn't a gun rights group and been doing it for 31 years now. If you live in a state that has permitless carry concealed and open, you can thank me. Chances are good we were involved in it. So including here in West Virginia. So deeply involved in the two A fight and space and been doing it for a long time. Have a lot of really great employees and people who care passionately and we're big fans.

[Tim Pool]

Right on. Well, thanks for coming. We have another guest here. Who are you, sir?

[Ronnie Adkins]

I am Ronnie Adkins. I am the industry relations director at national association for Gun Rights. I'm also the vice president of Funker 530 and it's a little tough to follow that. I'm not sure what I'm doing here. I'm really just wearing pants against my will.

[Tim Pool]

All right. Ian's hanging out.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, man.

[Phil Labonte]

I'm a bit of a gun noob. So it's good to, good to see you guys. Have a little pre, pregame chat.

[Dudley Brown]

We'll be gentle.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, I'll be asking the, the layman questions and we'll maybe suss some of this stuff out. Ian Crossland reporting for duty.

[Ian Crossland]

Hello, I am Philabanti. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band all that Remains. I'm an anti communist and a counter revolutionary and yeah, let's go smash that.

[Tim Pool]

Like button my friends. Share the show with everyone you know and then let's jump into that news. We got this from ABC News. Trump election case is tossed after special counsel Jack Smith request dismissal citing categorical DOJ policy. The judge left open the highly unlikely possibility of a future prosecution. The judge overseeing Trump's election interference case dismissed the case Monday after special counsel Jack Smith asked the judge to toss the case due to longstanding DOJ policy that bars the prosecution of a sitting president. What I find interesting here is that Trump is not the sitting president, but they're dropping the case even before he gets in simply. And he's not even legally president elect. He's only, I guess in the media we call him that he's not president elect until they count the electoral college votes on January 6th. And he's not president until January 20th when he swear he's sworn into office. So as of right now, he's just the guy who the media says has won and they're already dropping the cases against him. They say Smith also asked the judge in Trump's classified documents case that his appeal against Trump's two co defendants in that case, Walt not and Carlos de Oliveira, be allowed to continue U.S. district Court Judge Tanya Chutkan dismissed the election interference charges against Trump without prejudice, leaving open the highly unlikely possibility of a future prosecution. Now, here's where it gets interesting. Pam Bondi, Trump's choice for ag, says that she has a. She has a past vow she will prosecute the bad prosecutors who indicted Trump, NBC news reports. In 2013, Florida Attorney General Pam Bonnie's office faced a decision whether to join investigations from other state attorneys general into Trump University, where students paid up to $35,000 for business classes that critics claimed were fraudulent. Blah, blah, blah. They say since then, two former state attorneys general have followed polar opposite political paths. Let's get to the point. Bondi spent the last decade, et cetera, et cetera. Bondi called the prosecutors who charged Trump with crime, members of the crimes, members of the deep state, spreading a false conspiracy theory that DOJ prosecutors and FBI agents were part of a secret cabal trying to undermine Trump. Bondi, without citing evidence, said that since they were no longer hiding in the shadows, they can all be investigated now. I love how this is an opinion piece. NBC News loves doing that. Heavy opinion injected into this very little news other than Pam Bondi has in the past said prosecute the bad prosecutor. So we are all hoping, but I will add, if they're saying outright that this is the charge is being dropped without prejudice and there's a possibility of Trump being charged in the future, they are basically screaming at the top of their lungs to Trump's ag to criminally charge them.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, look, I don't know. I mean, I just want to see the cpomdi go after what's his name, the special counsel, because if I. Yeah, Jack Smith, if I understand correctly, he was appointed illegally, right?

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

I believe this. Wasn't there a court ruling that he was not eligible?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, there was.

[Tim Pool]

Let's pull that up.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. I'm not sure what the details were, but if I understand correctly, he was appointed illegally. The, the, I believe it was the Supreme Court that said that his, his role as special prosecutor was, was, it was, there was some procedural reason that he wasn't. But, you know, if he is not, if it's not legal and he's been spending all this time going after President Trump or President Elect Trump, whatever you want to call him, I would like to see this get taken out because I personally don't think, I mean, regardless of your opinion on Donald Trump as a president, you know, if, if the existing administration creates a scenario where it's a politic, where it's just political motivation to go after a president. I mean, this is, this is unprecedented. This, it's something that has, historically, you know, presidents that break the law and do things that are questionable. Questionable legally or the legality is questionable. That's been something that, you know, Washington and the opposing party hasn't gone after presidents. For President Obama with the, with the, with the drone strikes that killed American citizens. You have.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. Judge Eileen Cannon ruled this is back in July that Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel was unconstitutional because he was not appointed by the president or confirmed by Congress, leading to her to dismiss the entire case. So this is, this is back in July.

[Phil Labonte]

Was he appointed by, does that say.

[Ian Crossland]

By the doj, Right.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

But we are losing sight of an issue here, though, because the core issue we're talking about is the claims of fraud, that the 2020 election was stolen. And should that be, should it be taboo to question and make wild claims about a stolen election? I don't know. I don't know where the lawsuits there has to be.

[Tim Pool]

You have to be able to.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, you have to be able to question it. But should you, should you be able to make any claim you want and not have to prove it? And in the case of a sitting president who at the time anyway was sitting and was calling, we know he was calling a secretary of state in Georgia and saying, can you, can you find 8200 votes? Find me 8200 votes or whatever it was. Yeah, that does. Basically what it does is it degrades our faith in institutions. And without faith in institutions, we are not a country. We are not.

[Tim Pool]

I'd argue that we're not a country. When the Supreme Court refused to issue a ruling on Texas v. Pennsylvania, when Texas was challenging under original jurisdiction, whether or not Pennsylvania violated the Constitution by altering the rules of an election outside the legislature, and the Supreme Court said, we're a bunch of cowards who won't look into this. And only Thomas and Alito had the gall to actually say, well, this is our jurisdiction. We need to answer this question because of that. So you can argue that. I think it's fair to say we've got one side that's arguing Trump was wrong. He shouldn't have done this. I say, sure. The other side says, well, Trump has to do this. I agree that anyone who questions an election has an absolute right and duty, especially a president, to investigate or push in all facets the challenges under the law. But when the courts start throwing out every challenge on standing, so we don't actually get rulings and the Supreme Court refuses to actually hear the challenge. Challenges. When we see states where judges and governors were changing election rules, then, then you're going to get absolute chaos. Because if you, if you, if you go to the courts and you actually argue on the merits, the judges didn't do this. They threw him out on standing for the most part. Meaning, oh, we don't think that Trump's has, has standing in this. He's not party to the damages. Then what ends up happening is one side says we are not being heard and the election was rigged, that that's the only conclusion they're going to make.

[Dudley Brown]

But hasn't Trump already said that he, he did lose 2020? He just recently said that?

[Tim Pool]

No, during the debate he was challenged on that and then he snapped. It was like, what? No, I never said that. I said, I said it was stolen. It was stolen. And, and that was actually a point of contention in the, in the comma, in the debate because they said Trump started. It's, it's, it's this, this trap that they've laid for Trump consistently in, in the press where they want him to yell about previous election or the previous election instead of this current one. Trump ranted on it and said, I didn't lose, I didn't lose. And then finally went, I don't want to talk about the past anymore and decided to move on.

[Dudley Brown]

Which actually, I don't want to talk about the past. Wish that had happened much earlier. I mean, it worked out. But, but the fact was, but we got to stop prosecuting this 2020. I mean, we all agree that there should be election integrity and we got to make the efforts to do it. But just literally talking about destroying the institutions completely and saying we need to terminate the Constitution is not the way conservative should. A conservative should.

[Tim Pool]

I don't think Trump, Trump ever said he wants to terminate the Constitution.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, well, he, he's been, he's been, he's a little wishy washy on when it comes to, when it comes to fidelity to the Constitution. But I mean, look, the argument, I think that the argument that Trump would make or was making that the, the 2020 election was novel because of COVID because of the way things that went, because of a lot of things that went down. It was completely and totally different from any other election in history. I don't think that anyone is going to argue that it was normal. The fact that there was so much ballot harvesting that there were ballots mailed out to people based just on the census. So all those things changed the way that the election, the results of the election. And so whether or not Trump articulates properly the arguments that he's making, because the guy never articulates arguments properly. He's talking with his gut. And that's how people hear him, too. His people that are.

[Dudley Brown]

And how he connects with people.

[Ian Crossland]

Exactly.

[Ronnie Adkins]

That's what resonates with.

[Dudley Brown]

It does.

[Ian Crossland]

Exactly. And so fair enough. People that are going to go ahead and look at the letter of the law, they're going to say, Trump said this and he said that and it was wrong and blah, blah, blah, they're probably right. But the fact of the matter is everyone does agree that because of COVID and because of the way the election was, it was a novel election. And for Trump to say, look, find me the votes, because I know they're there, that's not saying go create votes, that's saying go count.

[Tim Pool]

And they did find votes later on. Yeah, they were like, oh, look, a USB with a bunch of votes on it. Yeah, but that's besides the point. So Trump never called for the termination of the Constitution. This is a lie from the corporate press. CNN runs the headline. Check this out. This is hilarious. Trump calls for termination of Constitution and truth social post. Of course, the people who then don't follow the media or who don't follow, who don't follow news, just see the headline and believe it's true. What Trump actually said, quote, do you throw up the presidential. Do you throw out the presidential election results of 2020 out? Do you throw the presidential election results of 2020 out and declare the rightful winner, or do you have a new election? A massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Big then, big tech, blah, blah, blah. So the issue there is, there is this is not news. This is an opinion piece. Real news would say Donald Trump made a statement about fraud in the election and what it and what it could result in. They would then go on to say, while some in the Democratic Party are saying this is Trump calling for the termination of the Constitution, others are pointing out Trump is saying that should there be a fraud, the rules have been thrown out and this allows people to navigate beyond the Constitution. He never called specifically for doing it. They just lied. Because CNN is opinion and not fact.

[Phil Labonte]

When it comes to having faith in the institution. I agree it's important, but I think it's also legal for people to lie, politicians to lie, and if they say there's fraud when there's no fraud. I'm pretty sure it's legal to do that. And since, you know, politicians lie, I lose faith in the industry.

[Tim Pool]

This is, I just, I can't do this, dude. Liz Cheney. This is an article from 20. Donald Trump believes we should terminate, quote, all rules. Right? He never said that. Imagine if I said this, said it like this. Section230 allows for people to post obscene, disgusting, far left psychotic content on social media and throw out all norms as it pertains to free speech. Is that me calling for the overturning of free speech? And that's what they do whenever Trump says something and by all means, I'm not going to, I'm not going to defend Trump on his, on his accurate, on him having accurately articulated anything pertaining to the 2020 election. He gets criticized right now because he went on Joe Rogan and when Rogan asked him about what happened in 2020, he didn't really have much to say. But I digress. They run these smears and you know what? All that matters is he won the popular vote because people have seen through Liz and Dick Cheney's BS and the corporate press screaming and crying about how they're the real press and no one else is but in rally they're just lying the whole time.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, it didn't hurt that he was running against someone who had run a coup against, against the sitting president Joe Biden and had 107 days to campaign and was, was a horrible candidate. And frankly I think he, I think.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Throw somebody in sideways, you know, that did not hurt.

[Dudley Brown]

But I agree with you. He, he resonated with people and unlike anybody expected and, and you know, to.

[Ian Crossland]

This, to the point that Dudley was making earlier, like, you know, you, you, you can be critical of President Trump but when you, when you factor in the things like the novel election and stuff, it makes it really hard to say, okay, yes, Trump has to follow the letter of the law, but everything else is everything else, the borders are kind of fuzzy or the distinction between legal and illegal or, or procedure following procedure and not if all of those situations are all fuzzy and kinda and you're not sure and blah, blah, blah. But then when it comes to Trump, everything is, it must be the letter of the law. Exactly. Blah, blah, blah, he said this and that alludes to this and blah, blah, blah, then you're going to have people that look at the situation and they say, well I don't trust either side. You know, I don't, I don't believe that It's, I don't believe that either side actually has the, has honesty at their, as their goal.

[Tim Pool]

There were a lot of claims about 2020 and I just, you know, largely say, I don't know, you know, I think it was just, you know, ballot harvesting. The funny thing is that article says that, you know, Pam Bondi was alluding to some kind of secret cabal or whatever. But as we know, it was Time magazine that actually coined the phrase shadow campaign. And I think they actually referred to it as a cabal, didn't they?

[Ian Crossland]

They did.

[Dudley Brown]

So let's cabal.

[Ian Crossland]

When I read, yes, they did, they.

[Tim Pool]

Said a well funded cabal of powerful people were conspiring. They literally say conspiracy. So Time magazine wrote this article, Molly Ball did, and I love bringing it up because this just refutes so much of what they were saying. The secret history of the shadow campaign that saved the 2020 election, where they say a conspiracy was unfolding, where a well funded cabal was engaging in electioneering, blah, blah, blah.

[Dudley Brown]

Journalism at its finest.

[Ian Crossland]

When I read this, I, you know, I was blown away that they actually printed it because I'm like, this is, this is, this is coming out and literally admitting to doing everything they can to rig the election. Right? That, that's the way that it, that it reads when you, when they, all of the, the verbiage they use and stuff like that. And I sent it to some left, my left leaning, my left leaning friends and of course they're like, well, that's just politics. Well, I'm like, then what the hell do I care about if Donald Trump is saying, oh, find me the votes because they're there? He wasn't saying find me the votes as in create them. And it becomes really hard again, like I said earlier, it becomes really hard for me to think, well, Donald Trump has to be squeaky clean and write to the letter of the law. When Time magazine publishes this and everyone on the left says, oh, well, yeah, I don't. If that's the case, it's like, up yours.

[Dudley Brown]

Just act smug and say, yeah, this is, this is power.

[Tim Pool]

This is February 4, 2021. It is just after the inauguration, well before the criminal charges against Trump pertaining to January six or anything like that, they were writing articles where they outright, I should say Democrats and their allies in media had published an article where they outright explained that they engaged in a conspiracy. Their words. The conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes. Resistant CEOs and powerful unions and a shadowy cabal. And then Donald Trump's like, maybe we should investigate the election. And they're like lock them up.

[Dudley Brown]

AFL CIO is not what we'd call a right wing cabal. That's nor is the Chamber of Compromise. So but, but back to the original point about, about a potential AG coming in and, and wiping the slate clean and saying all right, I'm going to prosecute these people for what they've done. Let's shine some light on the rats and see what happens.

[Ian Crossland]

Now you're talking my language, Doug.

[Dudley Brown]

Lawfare's let's put Lawfare over the whole we feel like a banana republic because we've seen these using the judicial system to prosecute people and put them put your political opponents in jail rather than just beating them in election.

[Phil Labonte]

You know, the issue I have with putting go targeting Jack Smith with Lawfare is that he got appointed illegally. It wasn't him. I mean technically, once he was appointed, he was doing something illegal. But the people that appointed him should be investigated. Like whoever that was at the DOJ that appointed an illegal special counsel should be investigated.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Multilayer accountability.

[Dudley Brown]

Sure, it's Mayor Garland.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I mean who else Individual himself. But, but those, each of those layers that ultimately contributed to the end state.

[Dudley Brown]

The man who wasn't who's not a Supreme Court justice. Merrick Garland. That's how you should refer to him all the time.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to the story from the post Millennial Axios CEO goes on tirade labeling Elon Musk's declaration that citizens are the media now as bs. I love this because the dude is just absolutely losing his mind. And it's fun to watch.

[Dudley Brown]

Popcorn?

[Tim Pool]

Oh, it's on msn.

[Dudley Brown]

I want some popcorn here for this.

[Tim Pool]

Where's the audio? We got no sound. The October 15th deadline has passed. Are you prepared for what's coming? Do you owe back taxes? Are your tax returns still unfiled? Miss the deadline to file for an extension? Now that October 15th is behind us, the IRS may be ramping up enforcement. You could face wage garnishments, frozen bank accounts, or even property seizures if you haven't taken action yet. But there's still hope. Tax Network USA has helped taxpayers save over $1 billion in tax debt and has filed over 10,000 tax returns. They specialize in helping people like you reduce their tax burdens. And they can help you to don't wait any longer. Visit tnusa.com Tim Pool or call 1-800-958-1000 for a free consultation. Their experts will walk you through a few simple questions to see how much you can save. Act now before the IRS takes more aggressive steps. Take control today. Visit tnusa.com pool or call 1-800-958-1000. Is it muted? What's this episode is brought to you by Dragon Ball Legends, the ultimate Dragon Ball experience on your mobile device. Dragon Ball Legends features action packed anime action RPG gameplay with Goku, Vegeta, Trunks and all your favorite Dragon Ball characters. Summon your favorite characters from popular Dragon Ball anime series such as Dragon Ball Z and Dragon Ball GT2. Dragon Ball Super. Fight in real time against friendly or rival Dragon Ball players from across the globe in live PvP battles. Enter ratings matches with your favorite Dragon Ball characters and earn rating points and rewards. Unite with friends to defeat powerful foes in co op. Dragon Ball Legends features the best anime fighting scenes on your mobile device. And now Legends Festival is on so you can get up to 300 free Summon tickets. Are you ready? Download Dragon Ball Legends today. Available for free on both iOS and Android devices. Going on. We just have no sound. Give me the sound.

[Ian Crossland]

Mute it.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, there we go. I see. Nope, nope. Sound is just. We just. We just don't have sound.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Have you tried the onoffs?

[Dudley Brown]

Twitter? Everything we do is under fire. Elon Musk sits on Twitter every day or X today saying like, we are the media. You are the media.

[Tim Pool]

My message to Elon Musk is bull.

[Dudley Brown]

You're not the media.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, we are crime.

[Dudley Brown]

You're having.

[Tim Pool]

You having a blue check mark, a Twitter handle and 300 words of cleverness.

[Phil Labonte]

Doesn'T make you a reporter.

[Tim Pool]

You don't do that by popping off on Twitter. You don't do that by having an opinion.

[Dudley Brown]

You do it by doing the hard work.

[Tim Pool]

What? Yeah, this is like, what hard work are you doing there, buddy?

[Dudley Brown]

Tim, this is. This is really. This is really like a. The candle makers being furious at light bulbs.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean, they are so far behind the swing here that they don't. Do they not know that their occupation is basically dead?

[Tim Pool]

There's a great line in iRobot because I watched it a couple weeks ago and the Will Smith's character is talking to the CEO and he's like, your robots are bad, basically. And he was like, I got a commercial idea for you. It's a carpenter working really hard to make a birdhouse and the robot comes in and does it better. And then you call it, you know, our company issuing on a little guy and the guy says, you're the kind of person that would ban the Internet to save libraries. And that's what I see with this guy in the Corporate press. The issue is they're not the media. What does it mean? What does it mean to be the media? Did he say you're not the news? Let's play that again.

[Phil Labonte]

Thank you.

[Ronnie Adkins]

My first question was going to be.

[Tim Pool]

My message today saying like, we are.

[Dudley Brown]

The media, you are the media.

[Tim Pool]

My message to Elon Musk is bull, you're not the media. Hold on. You know, and that's the important distinction. He didn't say news.

[Dudley Brown]

No.

[Tim Pool]

He didn't say they're doing fact checking. He's saying we are the elites who control the broadcast towers and the little people, the rabble are not allowed to speak up. That's what he's saying of Internet video.

[Phil Labonte]

You are the media. You are your own producer, you are your own creator. And media is much more than news and journalism. You make a song and you put it on the Internet. That's a piece of media. You control your media.

[Dudley Brown]

Now look at that picture. What? He's standing at the National Press Club. And doesn't that strike anybody as weird? It's the press club. Why is it the press? Because they were pressing ink on paper. That's how far back we are talking about. You can say, oh, it's tradition. Now these are, these are dinosaurs who are extinct and they don't know it.

[Ronnie Adkins]

They don't, they don't, they don't understand the nuance and energy that goes into some of this content creation that you have now that's bringing reality to people's faces. When the media, you know, mainstream media, whatever you want to define that as is right? So the effort like you alluded to, to, you know, produce your own content, set up your own studio, fund your own studio. I mean, I'm in one right now that has kind of built itself. What work is he talking about that's not there for that bunker is an example.

[Phil Labonte]

You guys put like head, head cams on soldiers, although you don't do it, but head cams on soldiers, body cams.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Well, I mean we, so we, we send, we send our team members into, into conflict zones. Right. You know, I mean, we're step beyond that. You know, I'm talking about more the people that try to provide that expert nuance on things where you'll have, you know, this media segment that's like a four minute long hit on such a nuanced topic like war. You really need these creators in spaces that are available like Twitter to really provide the additional context and nuance necessary to distill something like that. Because watching the news, you can ingest the entirety of the news, but being able to then digest that information, do you have enough context and nuance to do that? I don't think you'd do, because again, and I've done some of these spots, it's. It's a four minute. You get four minutes to relay your information.

[Tim Pool]

The fascinating thing about this guy losing his mind is that I'm like, bro, it's been 14 years, right? X has been around for a long time. Twitter at the time, and I remember during the Arab Spring and then during the Spain, what was it like? An M24 movement was called. And then of course, Occupy Wall street, everybody was using Twitter to report and relay information. And the news media at the time was saying, look at this social media, citizen journalism. Now, the funny thing is these people lost their minds. And to this day, they still don't know what citizen journalism is. And I'll give you the distinction because this is important. The only reason anybody gets the definition of citizen journalists wrong is because scumbags like this guy and the elites who face losing their job want to make sure they disparage and discredit an independent media. Citizen journalism is this. A guy is walking his dog, A car crashes and he pulls out his phone and he films it. He uploads the video, he walks home with his dog. He never engages in journalism again. Citizen journalism was coined as a reference to regular people posting video and photos to the Internet. However, what ends up happening is we now have on X and we've had for some time now, but now it's getting particularly more prominent, especially with the ability to make money. Accounts that exist solely for the purpose of reporting news. That would just be a journalist, a regular journalist, Mario Knopfel, for instance, a guy who has a team, they collect information, they disseminate it on Twitter. He's got rnx, he's got a big show. This is a guy who is not a citizen journalist. But the corporate press has long called any independent personality citizen journalist. Because in these circles, in the press club and at these events like News Exchange, they all understand that to mean these people are not journalists. They accidentally are reporting news. So that's why when I hear people using their language I reject, I say, that's not what citizen journal journalism is. And I am proud to say that 11 year or 13 years ago, I went to. Or is it this is 11 or 12 years ago, I went to News Exchange in Morocco and I sat in front of a crowd of several thousand journalists and I said they should all be fired from their jobs, every single one of them, because they have no idea how to use technology. And they're reporting an archaic means in archaic ways that do not reach regular people. And here we are, finally, this guy is now screaming, having figured it out. But I. But I. But I love it because there's another moment I want to shout out at. It was black. It was black hat. I believe the hacker convention. Much more corporate than defcon. But they happen around the same time. And there were these like, powerful. There was a. Some panel was happening on digital media, social media, and the people who run these big companies. There were a couple people on a panel. Someone asked in the audience, why should we care what you have to say? We can get information from regular people on social media. And they lost their minds. Dude, it's about time these dinosaurs accept that they are trying to ban the Internet to save libraries.

[Ian Crossland]

The situation that he doesn't seems to. That he neglects to even address is the fact that the corporate media failed miserably during COVID That's a big reason why you see podcasts and you see new media or whatever you want to call it, be so influential and have such an impact. If the corporate media hadn't been the lap dog of the established government, if the CDC had been telling the truth to the media, or the media had been pushing back as opposed to doing exactly what the government said they should do, then they might be in a position to say, no, we're necessary. They might be in a position to say, the service that we provide is valuable. But they were a literal arm of the government. They were a propaganda machine and they did whatever the government said. There was so much pushback about the idea that it came from China. Just saying that it came from China would get you called racist and stuff. And I'm not gonna get into the many things that turned out to be untrue during COVID But the fact that the media was doing exactly what the government wanted them to do, and they did it because they wanted the access to the government and they wanted to be able. They wanted to know that they would get a cushy job or they would be able to get someone's home phone number so they could get the scoop, so they could get the information out to the population fastest. And they totally advocated their initial job, which was to hold powerful people accountable. They became just a propaganda arm and they totally missed the whole point of their existence. So for them to say now that they're upset that the. The new media that other sources are out there is absolutely ridiculous.

[Dudley Brown]

This is just them he's chanting, look at me because you people are ignoring me. As Tim said, you guys, Axios is what, how, how big? So compared to Tim Kaz.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, they do. So someone posted a report, they do like 24 million per month. I'm like, wow, that's crazy. We do like 70 to 80 from.

[Ronnie Adkins]

A certain perspective though, right? So, so my, my military, military background is in like information operations. Right. So I also see an open ended platform like this as kind of a gold mine. If I was still performing that function from a dissemination perspective as a dissemination medium, you know, something without checks and balances from a level of expertise, what you're really looking at is the opportunity to really shape narratives in whichever direction you want with, you know, false, some false sense of expertise. Right. So you'll have these, you know, anonymous Twitter accounts, kind of, kind of X accounts, excuse me, kind of posing as this, as some level of expert on a topic when in actuality what you're really seeing is something regurgitated with a couple of words changed. So where exactly the balance is to that, you know, I'm not really nuanced or eloquent enough to understand, but I do know that when I look at something like this, I see a breeding ground for misinformation, disinformation, stuff like that. And you can't, you can't say that that's not there. And the design is that the community is supposed to weed that out. But what's going to need to happen over time is it's going to take time. Right. Rather than being told somebody is an expert and presenting bona fides over time, you'll have to eventually, you know, as a society, weed out those accounts.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, we've got Community notes that's a really good stab at that. And it's kind of like saying reality is a breeding ground for murder. And how do we navigate around the way of laws and we have rules and social morals? Because it is real life is a breeding ground for all the horrible things that can happen in real life. We've just tempered it so that it's very unlikely for it to occur. And it's the same thing with disinformation.

[Ronnie Adkins]

The level of anonymity opportunity is orders of magnitude higher when it's, you know, you can just throw up an anime profile pic and then, you know, make broad ranging claims on topics that you don't necessarily have the expertise yourself. But if it's, if it's confident, right. So you know, those that have studied communication styles know that delivery of information confidently increases the likelihood that somebody's going to believe what you're saying. Right. So if you deliver that information confidently and it seems to be contrary to what a wider opinion is, then those of us that are open minded, myself included, are going to pay a little bit of attention to that. But what we, what we can't see is the orders of magnitude below that or beyond that where the original origin of the information is coming from.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to the story from Reuters. Trump pledge pledges Trump pledges 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico Deeper tariffs on China. So this story was breaking just a few hours ago. Donald Trump posted on January 20th is one of the many first executive orders I will sign all necessary documents to charge Mexico and Canada 25 a 25% tariff on all products coming into the United States and its and its ridiculous open borders. Trump said the tariffs would remain in place until the two countries clamped down on drugs, particularly fentanyl and migrants crossing the border illegally. On China. The president elect accused Beijing of not taking strong enough action to stop the flow of illicit drugs crossing the U.S. border from the U.S. into the U.S. from Mexico. Until such time as they stop, we will be charging China an additional 10% tariff above any additional tariffs on all of their many products coming into the United States, Trump said. Trump has previously pledged to end China's most favored nation trading status and slap tariffs on Chinese imports in excess of 60%, much higher than those imposed during the first term. I got to say, based af I'm very excited for this and I look forward to seeing how it plays out.

[Dudley Brown]

Wow.

[Phil Labonte]

Am I the worst case scenario? They they raised the price of everything by 25%.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Well, that's right.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean everything, yeah, that nothing could go wrong with that. So I mean inflation. Anybody familiar with inflation?

[Ian Crossland]

So I was really critical of Trump in the, in his first term when he talked about a true, when everyone was talking about a trade war, right. And the trade war never materialized. We never had, we never had the negative consequences that we were told were going to happen if when Donald Trump comes and gets into office and there's a trade war because the trade war never happened. Right.

[Tim Pool]

This is the. So the complaints about these tariffs is just first ordered thinking what's going to happen. Mexico and Canada are going to say please for the love of God know what do we have to do to stop this? And then Trump's going to say I want these concessions. And then the tariffs never materialize.

[Ronnie Adkins]

The concessions should Be that Alberta becomes greater Montana.

[Tim Pool]

I don't know.

[Dudley Brown]

I like that idea. Territorial.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Beautiful. Man, I just got back from. From a trip up there. Dude, it's awesome.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, the big problem is that if they don't materialize, fine, it's a trade negotiation. But we have imposed tariffs. It's what. It's one of the many factors that drove inflation. So look at Chinese goods and whether they're almost anything you buy from over there, which if you say you don't buy them. You got a phone in front of you. Sure, sorry. You do?

[Tim Pool]

Well, this is main Korea.

[Dudley Brown]

Okay.

[Tim Pool]

I think actually iPhones are China and I think androids. Well, actually some androids are made in.

[Dudley Brown]

China and we're in Viewsonic. Who makes those small. Yeah, but of course the negotiation and trying to close the borders down and make sure we're holding tight. But sorry, I'm not a tariffs guy and I never have been and no Austrian economist will make that argument. No, sorry.

[Ian Crossland]

And look like I have a lot of libertarian leanings. In my past, there was a time where I called myself a libertarian and that's exactly how I thought of it. When they were talking about the trade war, I was like, this is bad news. All the people that I listen to and read stuff about, they all said this is a bad deal. And like I said, it never materialized. So all I can say is I like if this was the. When the first time I was thinking, oh, this is what the Austrians tell me. And I agree, maybe, you know, and I was wrong and I was proven to be wrong. So again, I'm not an economist and I don't know what's going to happen, but I would, I would at the very least say I'll give the guy the benefit of the doubt this time because it was fine last time.

[Tim Pool]

Let's start here. Do you know where. How skateboards are made?

[Dudley Brown]

No, Not a skateboard expert.

[Tim Pool]

That's true. Just because we make skateboards and I've been skateboarding my whole life. I know this. Skateboards are made of North American rock maple. Either coming from the U.S. usually from Canada. They don't make the skateboards here. They. They take the wood. They chop the trees down, put them on big shipping containers and send them to China where Chinese laborers for dirt. Slave labor costs turn them into skateboards. Then putting on big cargo ships and sending them back to the United States. I never understood why that made sense. That's actually consuming more energy and more wasteful. But it's okay because the Chinese laborers work for 50 cents an hour so you can get a skateboard for cheaper so long as it's made by Chinese slave labor. The problem, the American companies that used to make skateboards go out of business and now people can't afford skateboards anymore. Skateboards end up costing $80 for a pro model where they used to cost 55. And it's because this, the, the, the companies that used to make them locally and could get them to you easily and the people whose lives were sustained and supported doing it. So what really, really bothers me largely about the shipping off of skateboarding manufacturing in China is that basically skateboarding is dead in this country. What is now an Olympic sport, which used to be a massive multibillion dollar industry, is watching massive collapse across the board. One of the reasons, I think, is that all of it was outsourced to China. The people who worked in the industry who would make the products lost their jobs. Now they're not working in skateboarding, advocating for skateboarding, doing sponsorships and promos. They're just out of work. Ain't no Chinese factory is going to come to the United States and put on a skate demo for kids to get them to buy skateboards. So what ends up happening is all of these, these factories start going under and now our culture, our economy and everything is worse off for it. It's an addiction. And I say we put 100% tariff on all of these goods and force the factories to come back. So when we make skateboards [e-mail] they are all made in America and that means our profit margins are smaller, but we still sell the boards for 55 bucks, whereas the other people who are making them in China sell them for more. And you know, I'll say that we try, we try. But I'm asking, you know, all of these guys in the industry, why is it that the industry has collapsed? And this is just one example. So you see the auto industry flee Michigan and they start opening plants in Mexico. Donald Trump, this is Michael Moore's famous speech, comes in and he says, Donald Trump goes to the auto manufacturers and says, I'm going to slap a 30% tariff on all your vehicles and no one will ever buy them again. It was the first time someone had stood up for the autoworkers in the Rust Belt. When Donald Trump got elected in his first term, what did he do? He did put those, I don't know if he put tariffs down, but we ended up seeing a $3 billion reinvestment from these trade restrictions into Michigan to bring back Autoworker jobs. Donald Trump loses, Joe Biden gets in. What's the first thing that happens? That factory leaves once again. And now the autoworkers are under an EV mandate and they're starting to lose their jobs because nobody wants to buy these things. And what happens to these people? Now, I'm not going to sit here and say, you know, that workers in unions, whatever, are guaranteed work when technology is shifting or changing, but you're not going to do it by government mandate. And shipping off factories to foreign countries doesn't make any sense.

[Dudley Brown]

Okay. And this is a little out of my lane. I'm a gun lobbyist, right, but studied economics and I consider myself an Austrian. Big fan of Ludov von Mises and, and a lot of libertarian friends love to school me on that world. I'm a free trader and all it ends up doing is hurting the consumer. Phil, you say, oh no, I didn't see anything wrong. I'll bet you two years ago you were complaining about inflation. It doesn't happen immediately. This stuff is a cascading effect.

[Ian Crossland]

The trade war never materialized. That's what I'm saying, that he was going to start a trade war and that was used as a big ask. And then the trade war never actually materialized.

[Tim Pool]

So he wasn't even saying that. The media was claiming.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, fair enough.

[Dudley Brown]

It's a loaded, the trade war is a loaded term. But, but you notice that the Biden administration kept the same tariffs. They didn't even get rid of them. So they agree. I, to me, it's exactly what the unions want us to do. It's a great way to destroy economies. I don't know the, the skateboard industry. But look, you're saying you, you're producing skateboards that are cheaper than the ones in China. Sounds like you're doing.

[Tim Pool]

That's incorrect. We are losing profits, sacrificing to make sure we can try and revive a dead industry and bring back the jobs that were lost. Because these scumbags, these companies, they don't care about the long term. They are addicted to short term gains. And they think to themselves, because I've talked to these companies and they say, look, just do the China board. You got Chinese slave labor, 10 bucks a board, you can sell them for 70 bucks, you'll make 60 bucks a board. And I say, then what happens to the shops? What happens to the factories in the United States? Why are we sending wood from Canada to China to make a board to send it back here? And they're like, because the Chinese will do it for 50 cents. And I'm like, I want people who are specialists who say, I can make a skateboard. I know how to take the wood, I know how to put in the press. I can cut it and we can innovate. Instead, what ends up happening is all these shops go out of business, all of these factories go out of business and they struggle to keep up. All because these, these greedy, short term morons are like, I'm going to make 50 bucks per board this year. And then four years, five years, six years later, there's no one to.

[Ian Crossland]

Hey, Eric Bolling here, inviting you to check out my new podcast, Bowling, where.

[Ronnie Adkins]

We deliver a daily dose of uncensored, unfiltered truth.

[Ian Crossland]

My new show is based on the bedrock of democracy, free speech.

[Tim Pool]

Every day. I promise to expose those who misinformation.

[Ian Crossland]

Edit, and push outright lies for their.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Own agenda on bowling.

[Tim Pool]

The truth is always our top priority.

[Ian Crossland]

So don't wait, listen, and subscribe to Bowling right now, wherever you get your favorite podcasts.

[Tim Pool]

Buy skateboards anymore. And now we're wondering why it is the biggest media outlets in skateboarding have collapsed, why pro skateboarders are now destitute. And it's because they sold off the industry to China, where all the garbage clothing is made. The brands have died. It's all centralized under one Walmart. No offense to Walmart. It's not Walmart specifically, but a corporate generic garbage brand. I don't want to live in that world. We need local factories that can compete, that are able to. And they can't compete with China. It's impossible. Americans have standards of living. We have rent we got to pay. We got health care bills, and the Chinese don't get any of that. So here we are saying, who cares if this Chinese labor at Foxconn, where these phones are made are walking off a building committing mass suicide. That's the American consumer saying, we don't care. I care. And you know what? Sometimes there's gotta be some hard asks and some big asks. I don't think these tariffs manifest. They may, but so what? I don't care. Force these companies back the idea that the United States is dependent upon China for all of this, and it's only because the American consumer doesn't care that Chinese people commit suicide en masse at Foxconn Labs. That's the only reason. So when you've got 16 people crammed into a four in a dorm with four beds and we're like, what do we care? It's cheap for us. Maybe we should be like this is not the way the economy should be functioning and we should bring jobs back here. The other, the other principal issue is what we're basically doing is extracting the economy and giving it to our adversaries. All of this money being said to China, even if it is 50 cents on the dollar or on the hour for these laborers, means that the money made by American citizens is sent to China to build up their economy while our suffers and our industry is collapsing. So I'm with Trump on this one.

[Phil Labonte]

He tried it again. He tried it in 2020.

[Dudley Brown]

Also.

[Phil Labonte]

His, his tariff situation in 2020 is in 2018 he did a 30 to 50% tariff on solar panels and washing machines, then 25% tariff on steel. This is worldwide, 10% on aluminum. And then the other countries struck back. That was 2018.

[Tim Pool]

That's pretty wild that in 2019 we were being told we had the best numbers of our lives.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, in 2019 he ended up printing and giving aid to the farmers. About some 28 billion or something. 12 billion. Increasingly 28 billion, which is a third of the farmers income in the United States to make up for the retaliatory tariffs from these other countries back in the United States eventually lifted the trade war. Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And what were the results in 2019? Record low unemployment. Wages were growing, outpacing potentially.

[Phil Labonte]

No, no, the deficit was a fact. The deficit was going up though.

[Tim Pool]

That's true. And Trump said as long as you're under levered. Now I'm not sure I completely agree, but Trump's position was be underlevered, grow more than you're accruing debt and you are seeing improvement.

[Dudley Brown]

That's called supply side economics. And that, that has been tried. And I'm the old guy here who can look backwards. Art Laffer in those days. Yeah, Art Laffer came up with that but explained on a napkin. But the simple fact is that really hasn't worked very well. And just spend money and somehow you'll get it back. It's like going to Las Vegas saying I lost on the roulette wheel. I'm just going to keep doubling my bet every time. Pretty soon I'll win. And we are spending our ourself into oblivion. We don't have the money to spend on this.

[Phil Labonte]

The philosophy of like you take a big loan to pay people to build a water mill to irrigate the crop so that you grow a bunch of food to pay back to sell that to pay back the loan and then you've got excess surplus, makes a lot of Sense. And he wants to scale that out domestically. I understand the philosophy. I don't know. The jury's out whether or not it would work. We could, you know, invest in our industry. We need to, I think that's the only way. Because you can't compete with slaves. You just cannot compete with slave labor.

[Dudley Brown]

You guys are talking, you guys are talking like Keynesians. We need to do this. The, the Austrian, which Austrian economics is really the libertarian side of economics. And they hold that it's human nature is what, is what you want to pay attention to. If you tax goods, guess what? They will do less of that particular good or that activity the more you tax it. And so the whole point is that don't make self licking ice cream cones. We're not trying to make that system. Don't try to make a system that.

[Tim Pool]

So how do we compete with slave labor?

[Dudley Brown]

Well, that is a great question because the fact is we're dealing with countries with incredibly low standard of living and there may be no true solution to that. Except, except you produce a good like the skateboards that are high quality, made in America and you probably advertise that, right? And so they sell to people who care about quality and the individuals have to care about that. I care about quality, so I only buy things that, that are higher quality and I value it much more. But there's people who are entering the market and they can't afford the higher quality.

[Tim Pool]

The Chinese skateboards are of comparable quality. They are high end. They are all well made and they're made by slaves.

[Ian Crossland]

One of the ways to deal with, with, with slave labor and stuff like that would actually be to get rid of things like unions and stuff in the US because unions drive up the price. You get rid of your minimum wage laws, you get rid of your unions and you get rid of the, the incentives like a right to work.

[Tim Pool]

Well, I don't, I don't, I'm not, I'm not a big fan of unions as, as they are institutionalized and have weird laws all around them. The idea of collective bargaining I get, I'm totally fine with that. Unions are these weird amalgams of quasi governmental institutions like the bargaining.

[Dudley Brown]

Collective bargaining is basically, it's, it's a bizarre concept. You cannot be a professional and collectively bargain because it's not a meritocracy. Right. I laugh because airline pilots and association, it absolutely is. These guys are being there on a scale like a teacher, you're on a scale how many years you've been there. It's not a Performance based. How many years have you been there? And therefore, that's your pay, that's not merit. That's just how long you've been sitting.

[Tim Pool]

But real collective bargaining outside of unions is completely within market norms. If you have 100 employees and they're not getting paid well, and they go, I don't want to work here because I'm not getting paid enough, and they all walk out, you, the employer, go, wow, I'm not competitive. And they're going to go somewhere else because I'm not doing. You have to raise the rates. The problem is unions are weird quasi governmental organizations that have, you can't strike now, but you can strike then. And then you get fined if you do it this way. And I'm like, that's, that's nothing. That's not real. That's some weird garbage.

[Dudley Brown]

But any of laws written to make that right work very well for them. For the union fat cats, most of the money that your union dues don't go into your negotiations goes straight into politics.

[Tim Pool]

Exactly.

[Dudley Brown]

Left wing politics. That's what unions do. So, and then.

[Tim Pool]

So that's not real collective bargaining. Right. My idea is like, if you've got a handful of employees and they're all like, guys, I just can't afford to work here anymore, so I'm leaving. Then the boss goes, oh, we're seeing a bunch of people quit, turnovers super high. What's that?

[Dudley Brown]

Collective. That's if everybody banded together and say, we're all going to work for this wage or we're all leaving.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, what's wrong with that?

[Dudley Brown]

And that? I mean, they can legally do that, but essentially it's a union.

[Tim Pool]

And that's what I'm saying. You know, in the early days, a bunch of employees being like, health, you know, like secure, like safety, all of these things are really bad. I don't want to work here anymore. It's like, okay, let's all walk out. Let's not do this. Okay, fine. And the boss has to negotiate with them. I think that's fine. Unions, that's not like, I don't think it's fair to call that what unions are. Unions are weird quasi governmental political machines that even the Teamsters, despite all the Teamsters wanting to vote for Trump, would not endorse the guy because they're political machines to steal money from workers. I despise how the government operates or how unions are operated within the government. But I love collective bargaining. I love it when people are like, we're going to work together, we're going to decide how we want to be here, how we want to be part of this machine.

[Phil Labonte]

So like workers unionizing is legitimate philosophy. It should be thus. But like does the company then have a right to say, then you're all out?

[Dudley Brown]

Well, in states, in states with right to work law, that's what we're really talking about here. States with the right to work law. You can't force a worker to join a union as a condition of employment. And so I don't know what states were up to, but we've had, we've had attempts at one vote in particular in the US Senate on a national right to work law. And there's a, there's been bills to pass that on a national level, but they're all around the country and a lot of the southern states are right to work. And yeah, those states are generally find better industry because the union can't collectively bargain for them. They don't have a sole negotiating power. And so if individuals want to work there, they don't have to join the union.

[Phil Labonte]

I could see in a state if they were like yeah, no unions, we're going to lower and no more minimum wage. Like if they took it hard and they're like we need to compete with foreign. Like you were saying, Phil, you get rid of the minimum wage, you'll allow the right to work laws. 12 year olds can now work for our company and our factory and we're going to pay $3 and 80 cents an hour. A lot of desperate people would keep that job and a lot of other people would be like I can't do that job for 380. Then they're out on the street.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, well minimum wage laws don't solve for any of that anyway.

[Dudley Brown]

28 states now are right to work. Not as many as, as constitutional Kerry.

[Tim Pool]

But I think Supreme Court needs to ban the idea that you can only get a job if you join the union. That that is.

[Phil Labonte]

What about child labor? Should we bring it back?

[Tim Pool]

Yes.

[Phil Labonte]

Like 12 year olds.

[Ian Crossland]

Absolutely.

[Phil Labonte]

No age laws. Nine year olds in factories with dangerous.

[Tim Pool]

Define work.

[Phil Labonte]

Okay. Putting metal plugs in a, in a grinding machine.

[Tim Pool]

That there's restrictions on even adult men doing those jobs.

[Phil Labonte]

What kind of restriction?

[Tim Pool]

Because whatever it's called OSHA.

[Phil Labonte]

So is that if you're a 40, get rid of that. No safety standards.

[Tim Pool]

No, they never said that. You're talking about child Lane.

[Phil Labonte]

Just asking.

[Tim Pool]

If a 40 year old man wants to go do a certain job, the government restricts whether or not he will be able to or not. Based on certain requirements, if a 12 year old wants a job, I say absolutely they should. We're talking about being a paper boy.

[Phil Labonte]

We're talking about like a fry cook or something.

[Tim Pool]

Not a fry cook. I mean, if a kid wants to take out garbage at a local restaurant, sweep the floor, mow the lawn, rake.

[Phil Labonte]

The leaves, I fried chicken at 14. I mean, so what?

[Ian Crossland]

Look, the, yeah, sure, one of the, it sounds like as soon as you say, okay, we're going to get rid of that, we want to get rid of this particular law.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Ian Crossland]

So you want to get rid of the, the minimum, minimum age to work.

[Phil Labonte]

I'm, I'm not, don't really want to.

[Ian Crossland]

I'm just, no, let me, let me get through it. The, your kind of gut reaction is to say, well, what about all these dangerous things that they might do? But the point is you're going to have, you're going to have actually generally intelligent people making reasonable decisions about what is and is not safe for people. Right? Like the images that come to mind when people say we're going to get rid of these things are images of like the late 1800s, early 1900s, when work was dangerous for everybody. It wasn't just dangerous for children, it was dangerous for men. You had men that were, you know, mining coal by hand. You saw like black lung was ubiquitous and all these things that are, that are terrible, but those things have ended for everyone. So it's not just children that don't do that anymore. Men don't go into coal mines without, you know, some kind of respirator or some kind of cleaning material or some kind of cleaning mask that, that makes sure that they're not breathing in coal dust and stuff all the time. So you're, you're actually talking about multiple different issues, OSHA and the age of, you know, how old a person can be to work. There's nothing wrong with a 12 year old sweeping floors or taking out garbage at a, at a, at their parents or whatever.

[Tim Pool]

But Democrats argue that as soon as someone says kids should have jobs, they immediately jump to the most extreme case and say they're trying to put kids in factories. What they want to do is create a, I call this domestication where when you look at this, how dogs came to be domesticated, it's, they were wolves and then the wolves that were too aggressive were not tolerated near the human camps. So over a long enough period of time, only the wolves that were more docile eventually creating proto dogs and then dogs. And dogs are basically permanent wolf puppies. Dogs behave like wolf puppies do. Like they never grow up. And so what, what they're doing now with this leftist policy to make it so that young people can't work in some meaningful way. There, there is an entire generation, millennials and Gen z, who are 22 years old and have never had a job. Bernie Sanders never had a job. And he's in the forefront of this.

[Dudley Brown]

Some would argue he has still never had a job.

[Tim Pool]

He's never had a job. He's literally never had a job. Correct me if I'm wrong. So those that you're listening comment below. But he's only ever worked in politics, so technically you can call it a job. Right? He's never actually had to like lift a sack of flour and move it to the other room for a baker or move a bag, move a bunch of bricks. So what they're trying to do is they're taking away meaningful work from young people so they grow up and become inept and incapable and incompetent. So you've got a generation now all voting for the same thing. And what do we find? It is terrifying to see listless millennials who say things on X like, I just want to sit around and watch TV all day because all they want to do is what they did when they were young. But then you look at people who are pro baseball players, pro football players. What were they doing when they were 2 and 3?

[Dudley Brown]

Working, busting their butts.

[Tim Pool]

Well, they were being trained. They were being, they were, they were, they were learning the game. And so these guys are now in their 20s or early 30s. They're pros at the top of their game and the only thing they've ever done is been trained to do this thing. They love doing it.

[Phil Labonte]

I'm open to child labor in the sense of what we're talking. Like a kid can do clerical work, whatever. But what about extending the 40 hour work week doing with overtime?

[Tim Pool]

Why?

[Phil Labonte]

Because we want to compete with slave labor. We're talking about how to complete.

[Tim Pool]

We don't want to compete with slave.

[Phil Labonte]

Labor, but we do want to compete with China's workforce.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I say we stop letting companies, companies ship everything off to China.

[Phil Labonte]

That's one way, but that's a big ask. They need to make it cheaper for labor.

[Dudley Brown]

Call me silly, but I'm in the freedom corner. I don't want to let people do what they want to do. And if you don't want to work for a company that has a 45 hour work week, don't work for it. You don't have to, you don't own the job. It's the guy who started the business has capital.

[Tim Pool]

But salary positions don't get overtime. Overtime is only for hourly.

[Ian Crossland]

Fair.

[Tim Pool]

So if you're on a salary, the expectation is that you're working full time whenever you need to be working.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, I don't have hours. I don't, I don't wait until 40 hours and go beep.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, overtime's hourly.

[Phil Labonte]

But so the people that do hourly, should we consider extending the hour like 42 hours and then every year it incrementally goes higher. Expect in 10 years it's going to be a 48 hour work week.

[Ronnie Adkins]

And you're thinking like incentivize additional work is what you do.

[Dudley Brown]

You're basically, you're saying government. So whenever, say should we, whenever you're saying should we insert. Should government. Yeah, because if you're going to keep making these claims, it's government doing this.

[Phil Labonte]

It's the government that said it has to be a 40 hour workweek. So we're just getting rid of the government's regulation in this sense.

[Tim Pool]

So let me ask, let me ask you a question then. Someone selling a product that is completely fraudulent, should we stop them? I don't know what government. Stop them.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, the court should, I mean, no, that's government. The court should buy by you filing suit as either the consumer or a competitor filing suit against the company that sells.

[Tim Pool]

So there was a, there was a company like 14, 15 years ago and they pop up now and then they sell these things called power bracelets. You ever see these magnetic? Yeah. They say they're ionized mylar bands that give you improved balance. They train their salesmen to you to do a magic trick, a magician's trick called the center of gravity illusion to convince you that they are increasing your balance. With a piece of rubber.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Silicon. They make millions of dollars doing this. Is that, should that be allowed?

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, yes, yes it should. But somebody who could disprove their claims or prove that they are doing it, their fake trick fraudulently should sue them.

[Tim Pool]

And then, but then what happens? They just win money. They win. What are damages for that they get five bucks.

[Ian Crossland]

Well out of business. I mean if you wouldn't go to business if you're fraudulent, there's nothing wrong with it.

[Tim Pool]

No, no, no, no, no. Hold on. From class action, from his perspective, there's no influence enforcement.

[Dudley Brown]

If you did a class action suit, you could sue for a lot of the people. But you know, caveat emptor buyer Beware if you, if the claim they make is, is seems a little off and you, you bought a five dollar bracelet because you bought their garbage and you saw their magic trick. Yeah, sorry, you're what? Frankly, you better, you get a better brain.

[Tim Pool]

What if you have three generations eating phthalates and pcbs and disrupting their endocrine. Endocrine systems into the, to the point where they're developmentally disabled?

[Dudley Brown]

Of course we should. They should be.

[Tim Pool]

So there should be a government entity with the power to enforce and stop them from doing it.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, I'm not suggesting that there, there is no place for government. I'm just saying when you're making these decisions, when you're trying to come up with these theoretical concepts, always insert should we. Should government not.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Dudley Brown]

Should we.

[Tim Pool]

So honest question then. Should government stop companies from putting poison in all of our food? Yes, but so, so there should be some enforcement agency that's going to restrict.

[Dudley Brown]

So we should clearly some standards. Yes. I'd rather have it done on a local level, but some things are too big on nowadays because of course you're producing goods that are sold all around the country and sometimes all around the world.

[Tim Pool]

This is. So I don't, I don't see a functional difference then in saying government has the ability to regulate for the protection of consumers. If it's the same thing about Chinese slave labor destroying industry in the United States and putting towns and people out of work.

[Dudley Brown]

I just don't think government does it efficiently. I think the market does a better job and I think the courts actually do a better job. I think you sue the living tar out of companies that produce garbage that are harmful or frankly dangerous.

[Tim Pool]

And I can agree that government is largely inefficient and bloated. So the answer then seems to be like sunset clauses. But the free market has not done well for the Rust Belt. We've got manufacturing jobs shipped off to Mexico and China. This is why Trump wants to put in these tariffs. People lost their jobs and Michigan has been absolutely destroyed by the flight from the state. More people are leaving the state than coming to the state. So the existing infrastructure is becoming more expensive to maintain. Per person making this is basically what causes the Flint crisis.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, Michigan's also facing a big political crisis from the leftist government, but that's.

[Tim Pool]

A product of the collapse of the state. I mean, if you go back to what Michigan was in the 40s and 50s and you see it booming, the rise of the auto industry, I know we can, we can give a lot of credit to World War II for destroying our competition overseas. But what we see now is the factories leave, people lose their jobs, families leave base. Infrastructure remains the same cost and gets distributed among the remaining population. This is what happened with Flint and why Flint switched off their water from the Detroit lines into the Flint lines, which basically got a bunch of people sick. They were saying the Detroit water was too expensive. It's the most expensive in the country and it's because they have an infrastructure that costs X. X is divided amongst Y people, but as more and more people leave the distribution, Y becomes smaller, so X becomes larger per person.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean we could debate the audio industry. And all I have to say to that is compare a 1982American made car to a Japanese car. Good luck with that because the unions had literally destroyed the American auto industry.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

And they, you know, they made cars to fail, said don't make them too, too good because one we can think they need to be replaced. We don't want something to last forever, then people don't replace it. That means the manufacturers are out and where else do they make their money at? At the service, at the far end of the sales side where you're servicing your vehicle at a dealership. And a lot of that stuff is gone too. In fact, that's why I like Tesla, is because all the middleman is gone. There's no sales middleman, there's no service middleman. It's weird.

[Tim Pool]

I think the end result of laissez faire capitalism would just be probably, it's a bit, I don't want to say it's hyperbolic, but I would say the end of humanity would be the end result. And the reason why is humans. If they're chasing after decentralized carnal desires, it's literally going to be porn and video games. Mechanisms that trigger dopamine is what we tend to see. And so I'm not a fan of communism and absolute government control, but I think there's some degree of restricted regulation based on a moral people deciding some things are destructive in the long term. And so what we see now is a lot of calls from conservatives to ban pornography because it's fried the minds of young men to an extreme degree. And all the research shows that their brains are addled and atrophied and look like that of hardcore drug users. So now there's a lot of people saying like, hey, maybe if we unrestrict the market people will just like the mouse with the cocaine button. You know about that one?

[Dudley Brown]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

They told the mouse, press the button, it gives you cocaine. And all the mouse did was just pressing the button. And there's a funny meme where it's two lab rats having escaped. And one lab rat looks at the one outside and says, we did it. We're finally free. And the other one says, yeah, but I'm gonna miss the cocaine button. When given the opportunity, humans overwhelmingly choose that. Now there is another point to be made.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, the evidence is just in how much, how people consume sugar, but.

[Phil Labonte]

Absolutely, they gave rats sugar and cocaine and they chose the sugar.

[Tim Pool]

But here's the alternative.

[Phil Labonte]

Find that study.

[Tim Pool]

It may actually not be that humanity just beats itself off to death by chasing dopamine. There are going to be high mental fortitude individuals who, when, when, when given the choice. We see this now with liberals. They're choosing to abort their kids, sterilize their kids. Well, well, the end result is mathematic Darwinism.

[Dudley Brown]

None. But yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And those who are cognizant of these things and who are more likely to pursue long term goals are less likely to destroy their children. And so give it 50, 60 years and what are we going to see? A staunch conservative government comprised of people who are more likely to engage in certain behaviors. One of my favorite examples is people often ask why it is that Europe is so screwed up. How come Europe is allowing these people to come in and commit these crimes? We've got one or Canada or whatever. And you know one point that I've made and many other made, why the people who came to the United States from Europe were those who are willing to die to land on a barren rock. Hopefully. Hopefully if they made it, if, if they third or more didn't survive the journey over several months on a ship. So you've got people in Europe who are like, I'll just grin and bear what my state has to offer despite it being bad. Then you had people saying, I'm gonna get a boat where I might die because adventure awaits and maybe, maybe I can make a better life.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So you're the slow and gradual cultural shift away from the foundations, which are a little bit more. What's the word I'm looking for? I wouldn't say rebellious. Well, we were, we are rebellious by nature. Warrior culture, if you will.

[Tim Pool]

But I'm saying that the history and culture of the people who came to the, of came to the States is that of defiance. And the people who stayed in Europe is that of submission. So you look at what Europe is and why it's constantly just in conflict and screwed up. Yeah, it's because. And why the United States has largely been much more unified.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I use this argument a lot of times when we get, you know, comments about firearms, you know, the Second Amendment, this and that. We're not the same as Europe and that's okay. Like, yeah, we don't, we don't have to be. We're, we're just not the same.

[Dudley Brown]

Sorry.

[Tim Pool]

Let's, let's jump to the story from the Daily Mail. Trump plans to kick transgender troops out of the military with 15,000 service members to be medically discharged on his first day in office. The controversial order would cause as many as 15,000 to be medically discharged. Trump seeks to issue an executive action on January 20, 2025, on day one of his term time said preventing any transgender people from enlisting in the military as all branches continue to struggle with recruitment. I've actually heard that following Pete Hegseth's announcement, they've seen recruitment and Trump's election. Enlistment numbers have been going up. Have you guys heard that?

[Phil Labonte]

No, not yet.

[Ian Crossland]

I've not heard anything about it. But I'd be interested to see some, some kind of evidence. Look, you can, I was tweeting about this today. You can get sent home for or get disqualified for any number of what in normal society are completely and totally irrelevant to most jobs conditions. You know, you could have add, you could have, you'd be flat footed. You could be, you know, you could have some kind of allergies, I think are some of the things that you can get some kind of food allergy, allergies, Any number of things can disqualify you for military service. The idea that gender dysphoria would not disqualify you, in my opinion is ridiculous. Like, that, that should have been totally obvious is bulimia. I. Eating disorders were named. Yeah. So both bulimia and anorexia could be. And clearly if you overeat, that'll, that'll get you, you'll fail a PT test.

[Tim Pool]

You know, so, so it could be 120. So from 2013 to 2017, 124 active duty service members were discharged as a result of eating disorders.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. And so the idea that people with gender dysphoria, you know, would be allowed.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I think it's the question, the, the return question to that. Right. And all of, all of those dismissals are ultimately predicated upon the inability to perform a function. Right. So if you, if you have an eating disorder of some kind, you can't really be expected to perform your fundamental Mission, you know, whatever that might be, whatever your MOS is, you know, whether you're infantry or a cook, if you have an eating disorder, that's going to be detrimental to that. The fundamental question that I would actually kind of throw out at the table here is, you know, does gender dysphoria ultimately cause one to be unable to perform their mission? Right. Because that's how I've always looked at topics like this is. We have, we have kind of shaped the military into this almost inclusive effort that everybody's individual perspectives, who they feel about themselves is what matters more necessarily than our ability to be lethal. Right. So from my perspective, ultimately, regardless of what your condition is in the military, if. If that keeps you from being able to perform your fundamental mission, and a part of that is being a part of a cohesive team, it doesn't matter what that condition is for me, because your identity doesn't matter when you put your uniform on. That's how I've always looked at that. But I'm interested to kind of throw that question back out. Just. Does gender dysphoria lead to an inability to perform your fundamental mission?

[Phil Labonte]

I don't. I mean, it depends on how you define being transsexual. If that's the phrase. Like, does it mean that you took bottom surgery? Because then, yeah, that's going to be. If you got scar tissue and you need a catheter or whatever the hell these tools, that could be a problem. But if it's just this burly dude that like kicks ass and then he's like, I'm a woman. Like, but he's still a beast on the field. It doesn't. He can still be a. Do that again, I'm a woman. Like, he can, he can pull it off. No one's going to care if he gets the job done.

[Tim Pool]

So I have a question. If you have like body dysmorphic disorder, they can discharge you if you want these? I think, I think. What's, what's the disorder called? Dissociative body identity disorder or something like that. What's the. Let me, Let me try and look this up.

[Ian Crossland]

I'll look it up.

[Tim Pool]

It's a disorder where you want to remove a body part.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So there are people who want to remove their hands.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And they have done horrifying things where they. Body integrity dysphoria.

[Dudley Brown]

How can this even be a discussion that somebody with that problem could be in a. Any level of responsibility?

[Tim Pool]

Well, because people would say they were.

[Phil Labonte]

Gay to get out of Vietnam draft, and they Want to.

[Tim Pool]

I want to. I want to. I want to clarify something. Gender dysphoria where someone seeks medical transition includes body integrity dysphoria. So body integrity dysphoria is individuals that feel specific body part does not belong to them or is alien. So if there's an individual who has male parts and they want to have that removed, that means that people with gender identity, Identity identity disorder or gender dysphoria also have body integrity disorder, like.

[Phil Labonte]

A subcategory of body integrity all the way around.

[Tim Pool]

Body integrity disorder can exist within people who are experiencing gender dysphoria.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, as anybody.

[Tim Pool]

Like, women want to remove their breasts.

[Phil Labonte]

But then you might feel like it's not part of their body, don't want to remove apart. You're saying you might still have a gender dysphoric state of mind without wanting to remove something?

[Tim Pool]

I. Yes, perhaps. I don't know. I'm saying that typically what we see is females wanting to remove their breasts, which would be in line with body integrity dysphoria.

[Phil Labonte]

This is what I'm wondering. What's the def. What's the official definition?

[Tim Pool]

Well, my point is at this stage.

[Phil Labonte]

Because if you're going to remove people that don't have any body dysmorphia, but they just think they're a different sex, is that really a reason to not be in the military? I don't know. I can't see how that would affect your mission. I mean, I would.

[Tim Pool]

I would say if you are having trouble aligning yourself with your physical presence, it's probably brown grounds for discharge. You know, the people who are serving in the military need to be effective and lethal to protect this country and our allies overseas. And if somebody is feeling an incongruence between their mind and body that I believe would affect their ability to do their job. And I don't care what that form that takes. I'm not saying gender. I'm saying if somebody's like, my hand feels alien to me and I need it off, it's like, okay, well, this person's going to not be able to function to the extreme. Like, let's put it this way. How many people, what percentage of people do you think are capable to serve effectively in the military, Ronnie?

[Ronnie Adkins]

I don't know. Half a percent?

[Tim Pool]

A small percentage of the. Of people have the capability to be the best of the best to serve. Now, certainly you're gonna have people say, like, yeah, but there are people in the military who are doing paperwork and stuff like that. I don't think we want to be in the habit of saying we'll take literally anybody and then find a place for them.

[Ronnie Adkins]

No, no, you can't. So, you know, like I was saying earlier, we've kind of gotten away from the military's fundamental mission.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Ronnie Adkins]

The fundamental mission for the military is to be lethal. Right. You know, whether that's whether you're a soldier, sailor, airman, Marine, that is ultimately whether you're combat arms, combat support, that is ultimately the mission that you are an enabler. Enabler for it. I do find the assimilation piece to this one that's interesting. So, you know, I've got a lot of friends that went through the Special Operations Forces pipeline, and one of the criteria for them to continue through or pass is the ability to assimilate as a part of the team. And that's ultimately where my mind goes as the most impactful. But it still very simply boils back to me personally. You know, I went to Afghanistan twice. Can you perform your fundamental mission? Can you do your job right? If you can do your job, which ultimately does include setting your yourself aside, selfless service, being one of those, you know, tenants and core values, if you're able to do that, then you should be afforded the opportunity to serve. But again, it boils back to selfless service. Can you assimilate as a part of a team? Can you. Can you focus on something not yourself? That's where I think we have this issue. One of these issues in the military right now that I'm starting to get a little bit excited about. Some of the path pathways that are being taken where we're prioritizing individualism rather than ultimately, again, the ultimate mission, which is to be lethal, to be able to maintain the crown. Heavy is the crown, and we need our military to be able to do that. So if we start to focus a little bit more on that as a fundamental right, rather than, you know, who are you as an individual? You're a soldier, you're a sailor, you're an airman, you're a marine, you're a Coast Guardsman.

[Tim Pool]

You.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Some people, most of you have seen that video of the coastie banging on the top of that sub.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Ronnie Adkins]

As that is total ba.

[Ian Crossland]

Total ba.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I could watch that every day and still not feel full from watching. Right. But that attitude, that attitude, he's not doing that, you know, as an individual. He's doing that as a part of an overarching member of a team, and he is able to fulfill his function. Can you. Can you do your mission? That's My question, regardless of what you call yourself, you know what gender you are, I don't care. Can you fulfill your function?

[Tim Pool]

So do you agree with Trump's position on this then?

[Ronnie Adkins]

No, no, I wouldn't say I would. Largely because I think it has to be pulled back a layer. Right. I think there are going to be some individuals in that 15,000 that absolutely could be a part of fulfilling a mission. But again, you have to be able to set your individualism aside. And one of the, one of the larger issues that comes along with this is individualism is the me, this is what I want to call myself.

[Tim Pool]

So I think the other issue is that this is affecting recruitment severely. I think the woke elements of the military have resulted in people resigning their commissions or just outright not wanting to enlist. And I've personally met maybe like two or three people who said, I remember one guy a couple of years ago, he was a captain and he said it was his goal and his dream to be a careerist and retire. And he's in his mid-30s, says, Nah, I resigned. I can't be a part of whatever this is. So the ideological divide here in, I think the issue is like, you could say a person who is transgender can easily serve. Not if it creates a hyper political divide to the point where you're going to have someone who's going to say, this is a DSM 5 mental disorder that is in line with a whole bunch of mental disorders we would not allow in the military. The military is broken. It has been politicized and I don't want to be a part of it.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So that goes, that goes back once again to what I was saying earlier. You have to be able to assimilate.

[Ian Crossland]

So if cohesion and stuff.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So cohesion is a part of that right now, how exactly we measure that. And I might not just not be intelligent enough to understand how exactly to employ that, but I do know that there is a recruiting crisis, right. I do know as a member of the military that I still think that it is a positive to serve, right. I still believe in our institutions. I think it's a positive to serve. And there is something that is keeping people from being a part of the military, right? So if there are people out there that can do that and they happen to fall into this category of 15,000, I don't know where that number comes from.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, is the drag. It's the drag queens that we see in the military ads, the promotion, it's the appointment of people who are, you know, I think when you've got a lot of people who. Let's go back to the army commercial that went viral where it was a cartoon about a girl saying, I have two moms. And then you look at everybody cheering on the Russian commercial where it's like a guy jumping out of a plane and landing. One was a male ego action movie and one was a feel good, you know, like drama for women.

[Dudley Brown]

And it probably didn't actually recruit the type of people you wanted in the military anyway. If you're trying. What is the military's job? Hold things up. Take care of the bad guys. Right. In essence. And the kind of people who are excited about two mommies and. Or having the drag queen sitting next to you in a sub. You don't want them in your military. Sorry, I don't think so. I'm totally with Trump. I shock everybody.

[Tim Pool]

I think the issue might just be with, like, if you want to live your life, you want to do your thing, like, by all means, like, you know, go ahead and do it. But if the. I don't know, 99. If the overwhelming majority of people might say we're tolerant of this, but it doesn't mean they want to be involved in the administration that's doing it. I think it's not just about transgender soldiers, but this is a component of what is leading to recruitment shortfalls.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

And guys, this is. Not only is it leading to less people joining the military because they don't want to be a part of that, but think of the long term implications. I mean, if you look at transgender people, they are. They commit suicide at rates it's like.

[Tim Pool]

30, 30 to 40%. Horrifying.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah. It's terrible. And there's clearly something wrong. You don't want those people in the military.

[Tim Pool]

They need help.

[Ronnie Adkins]

One of the things we do very.

[Tim Pool]

Poorly to live better lives.

[Ronnie Adkins]

One of the things we do very poorly from, you know, a selection perspective, there need. There need to be better mental aptitude tests. I mean, this across government. So let's just step beyond just the military. I think mental acuity, mental aptitude, that needs to be tested a little bit more from a service perspective. You know, a more of a fundamental approach on the service aspect to that setting the individual. I'm going to go back to the same word. I'm sorry, I keep beating this word. But setting the individual aside, I think if the focus shifts back to that, from a fundamental perspective, our military is off in a better direction. I don't think this specifically is itself the biggest issue. I think it is, you Know, a discussion to have as a part of a greater. A greater problem. Again, getting our military away from what it's designed and meant to do, which is be lethal.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, look at this.

[Dudley Brown]

Gosh, look at this.

[Tim Pool]

This was a huge story. This is why people. Why would someone. Look, you go to a young guy, he was at a sense of adventure. He has a sense of duty. He wants to fight, he wants to protect, he wants to serve. And then they're like, you'll be under this guy. He's like, not interested. So there's gone.

[Ian Crossland]

So there's.

[Tim Pool]

There are.

[Ronnie Adkins]

There are a litany of problems with this.

[Ian Crossland]

Right?

[Ronnie Adkins]

So that is against AR671. That dude. Immediately.671 is the uniform standard for the US Army. Right. So it tells you what you can and can't wear.

[Dudley Brown]

Ronnie here, throwing out the regulation.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I'm sorry, man. This one drove me up the wall because. So that is their standards. Right? Every military needs to have standards. It needs to set baselines. Of course, you'll have units and capabilities that exceed those. But across the force, there has to be, once again, a standard, because it's meant to. For everybody to be effectively the same.

[Phil Labonte]

You.

[Ronnie Adkins]

You wear the uniform. To wear the uniform, not as an accessory. That's what he's doing in this photo here. And to be frank, it's bs so he needed to be held accountable. I don't. I don't recall whether or not he eventually was, but that, to me, is not performing your function. That is a full bird colonel not performing his function.

[Tim Pool]

If they're doing the same thing in drag.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

What's the difference?

[Phil Labonte]

It's a unit.

[Ronnie Adkins]

If it's on their free time, how does it impact.

[Ian Crossland]

No, he's talking about if they're uniform. If you're a man wearing a woman's uniform, you're. You're essentially in Dragon military uniform now.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Well, so.

[Tim Pool]

And they post videos where they're in uniform, and then they. And then they wipe the camera and then they're in Dragon.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

I'm like, is that. Is that allowed?

[Ian Crossland]

There's one.

[Tim Pool]

They. They promoted that intentionally. They promoted these individuals. They paid to market that.

[Ian Crossland]

There's one thing that I want to say that this gets into a little bit of the whole philosophy behind the left. Right? And what's going on here is exemplified. So the left likes to go ahead and say things like, we want to. We want to center the marginalized. And that's exactly what they're doing. They're taking the people that are on the fringes. And they're making them the focus and the center of discussion. Just like you said, Ronnie, it's supposed to be. The military is supposed to be nameless and faceless. There's no, there's no. I, I remember, you know, I was in the military for a second. They used to always say, you know, there's no, there's no black Marines. There's no white Marines. There's just green Marines.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Marines.

[Ian Crossland]

Everybody's green. All green Marines. And, And. And that's the way that it was. But if you have people that are transgender or have some kind of weird kink that they want to wear a dog mask in uniform, this is centering. And by the, by the. The powers that be or the establishment saying this is acceptable, that is centering the marginalized in a. In a. Where centering the marginalized is absolutely unacceptable. So this is.

[Tim Pool]

This is.

[Ian Crossland]

This is not about whether they're functional or not. This is about. This is about rooting out leftist philosophy.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Setting that foundation poor right out of the gate.

[Ian Crossland]

Exactly. So get rid of the leftist philosophy in the military.

[Dudley Brown]

Kim wants to go something more important.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to this story from the Daily. You know this.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Love this one.

[Tim Pool]

The story is from the Daily Wire. Washington commanders agree to uncancel Redskins logo. The censorship of the former commander's logo was a classic case of woke gone wrong. The Montana. Montana senator wrote. So it sounds like what they're saying is they are going to bring back the. What do they call it? It's. The official name is. Let's just read it. They say the iconic Blackfoot chief logo. They are not. I do not, do not believe gonna say Redskins, but they're going to bring the iconic logo back. Now, my only, my only disappointment here is that as soon as they banned the Redskins, I ordered on Amazon Redskins Ziploc bags, hoping that they would accrue great value. And now they're probably not going to.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I've been a Redskins fan my whole life, so this, this logo is like a part of my childhood for me, you know, now didn't. But so didn't they actually. Weren't they ignored and didn't they actually have a lot of tribes come forward and say, hold on a second.

[Tim Pool]

Yep.

[Ronnie Adkins]

They were like, we actually love this.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Ronnie Adkins]

You know, they're like, we were a part of this.

[Tim Pool]

We want the logo to stay.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, it was. It was white liberals who. Who wanted to get rid of the name and logo.

[Phil Labonte]

Chief Wahoo was mine. I'm Cleveland guy Akron. And that was Like a Sambo kind of like, you know, 1920s caricature of a crazy Indian guy. And that was way more, if you're going to call it racist, that one was. This one actually is just a legitimate picture of a Native American looking dude.

[Dudley Brown]

And so we're calling him a Ray one too. Like, like that is not a guy you want to fool with that guy. Is that what you want your sports team to be associated with, like warriors and strong figures?

[Phil Labonte]

Red skin obviously indicates like black skin, white skin, red skin. It's a racial thing, so. Or it's just a slur.

[Dudley Brown]

The whole.

[Ian Crossland]

I get that the, the tribe approved it though. The, the actual original art was approved by the tribe that I don't remember the name of the tribe. So I'm not trying to be disrespectful.

[Ronnie Adkins]

The Blackfoot, right?

[Ian Crossland]

I believe so. But they approved it. And if I understand correctly, the tribe, like, part of the reason why this is even happening is because the tribe wants it back. They're like, yo, because we've talked about how like, you know, the Land Ole and the Land O'LAKES design. They took the native out on, you know, Aunt Jemima. They got rid of the black woman on Uncle Ben's. They got rid of the black woman. So you still got the product. But you're erasing people of color from popular culture by trying to be, you know, trying to be politically correct. You're actually removing them from spaces where they're commonly seen. And I mean overall that is a bad thing. If equality is what you want, you're going to have a, you know, you're gonna have there. They would say that they're characters, right? They're caricatures of actual people, but that there's no, there's no reason to believe that it was disrespectful. You know what I mean?

[Phil Labonte]

Similar thing with the Snow White. The recent Snow White movie I think never happened. It was going to be Snow White and like the seven crazy dudes instead of the seven dwarves. And a bunch of dwarves that were actors in Hollywood got pissed off taking jobs away.

[Tim Pool]

Snow White and the seven Companions.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So they. And the movie's not come out right. So it was Peter Dinklage who was like, how could they be so racist? And it's like, dude, Dinklage said that. Yeah, he got super mad and it's like, bro, Dwarf. Okay, let listen. The use of the term dwarf for little people was to be nice because people were offended by. And dwarves are a mythological story, folklore creature of. They are small creatures that are born from the clay of the earth and live in mountains. It was never a slur. It was. Or it did not evolve into a slur or whatever to be for little people. So when they had Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, it's literally a maiden. And mythological creatures born from the clay of the earth who mine gold. And then he's like, dwarf is offensive to me, so they shouldn't do it. So then they. They do the seven Companions. I gotta pull that image over.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, then Peter Dinklage should give out all the money he made from. From being the Lannister dwarf.

[Phil Labonte]

Exactly right. Typecast.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So it's the Blackfeet Nation, by the way.

[Phil Labonte]

Blackfeet Nation is the Washington, I guess, the Commanders. Is that what they mean?

[Ian Crossland]

Dinklage is accused of pulling up the ladder behind him.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Ian Crossland]

So, like.

[Tim Pool]

Well.

[Dudley Brown]

Oh, yes.

[Ian Crossland]

And it's not. It's not supposed to be like that. That's something that. It has nothing to do with the fact that he's a dwarf.

[Tim Pool]

But.

[Ian Crossland]

But he, you know, was. Was given a high profile, you know, part because of the fact that he is a dwarf. That is a key component for the Lannister.

[Dudley Brown]

And his character is literally one of the best in tv.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah. And now, because he's like, oh, I'm so offended. He's saying that other people that could have had, you know, important roles or had roles because of their. Because of their. Because they. The fact that they were a dwarf, now he's saying, well, we can't. And it's like, well, you got a role.

[Tim Pool]

What's wrong with that? Snow White and the racially and sexually diverse companions.

[Ian Crossland]

Wow.

[Tim Pool]

What a m. And they got rid of it. And I don't. I think the movie's just dead.

[Phil Labonte]

I think so, too. Is that Ziggler? Rachel Ziggler? Is that her name?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

She's talking a lot of crap about.

[Ian Crossland]

How all kinds of insults, all kinds of.

[Dudley Brown]

Oh, my gosh, the sickening race.

[Tim Pool]

So they had to redo the whole movie, basically. Let me pull up this.

[Dudley Brown]

Who's doing it?

[Tim Pool]

It's Disney. Take a look at this. Oh, they had to redo it after everybody was like, yo, that's the.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, at least are they puppets?

[Ian Crossland]

They know it's cgi.

[Dudley Brown]

They're all.

[Tim Pool]

That's terrible, man.

[Ian Crossland]

Put her in a video game.

[Tim Pool]

And now what's going to happen is there's going to be, like. There's going to be a bunch of actors like Dinklage who are saying, you mean you got CGI instead of hiring actors. There's nothing you can do when you pursue this woke garbage.

[Phil Labonte]

I just saw it was for. What's that Matthew McConaughey movie from 2003 where his family is a bunch of. Is it little people or is it dwarves?

[Tim Pool]

Well, I don't know what the term is. Wasn't the song like Snow White's skin was white as snow or something?

[Phil Labonte]

Oof.

[Dudley Brown]

It is.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah. I think she's white as snow. That's where she gets her name.

[Tim Pool]

Well, there you go.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, doesn't have white eraser. Skin is not very white. She's probably kept out of the sun.

[Tim Pool]

Because, you know, skin is white as snow is the description of Snow White. That's right. The evil witch describes her as that.

[Phil Labonte]

Just don't do the movie. If.

[Tim Pool]

Could you imagine, like, they do this movie and they get the evil queen and she actually says the line, her skin is white as snow, and then it shows her.

[Dudley Brown]

The worst part about all this is it cheapens. It really cheapens the term racist, because there clearly, there are racists who literally care about race more than anything else. But we've literally desensitized people to that term. Now it's gone.

[Phil Labonte]

I know when they say, I'm going to make a woman of color my vice president, that's racist. And to say that the other guy is racist because he didn't do it is bizarrely unhinged. Unhinged, I guess you say. So you got to focus on who are the real racists. It's the. It's the race baiters. It's people that focus on race.

[Ian Crossland]

Those.

[Phil Labonte]

That's racist, dude.

[Tim Pool]

They just.

[Dudley Brown]

That's. So. That's cringy.

[Ian Crossland]

Well, I mean, not to.

[Tim Pool]

Well, we're winning. There's. Yeah, the Chiefs. The Chief logo is coming back for this Freskin. So they're.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, they're saying self cancellation. I like it.

[Phil Labonte]

I guess the Cleveland Indians, are they a different name too now? Did they change the Cleveland.

[Ian Crossland]

I don't think so.

[Dudley Brown]

They just changed the. The mascot logo.

[Tim Pool]

Logo.

[Dudley Brown]

I think they changed the logo so they.

[Phil Labonte]

I don't think Wahoo's coming back.

[Tim Pool]

Scan these people. It's like, yeah, chill, dude.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, red skin.

[Tim Pool]

No, they're.

[Ian Crossland]

They're the guardians now.

[Phil Labonte]

Cleveland.

[Tim Pool]

Cleveland.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Guardians.

[Dudley Brown]

Oh, my gosh.

[Ronnie Adkins]

The logo is the same. I'm gonna be honest with you.

[Tim Pool]

Is the same.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Yeah. I'm not seeing a different logo here.

[Dudley Brown]

Okay. I don't know.

[Ian Crossland]

No, no, it's. It's.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Oh, it's a Different. It's a g.

[Phil Labonte]

I stared at this guy.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I'm looking at cached images here of it. That's what it is.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

Especially the Chief Wahoo from, like, the 20s and 30s. That was chief.

[Tim Pool]

Chief Wahoo pops right up.

[Phil Labonte]

Chief Wahoo from the 20s and 30s was like. You know, I could see that it got less offensive because, like, that was just a cool looking cartoon. But I guess we should.

[Tim Pool]

We should ban Elmer Fudd, too.

[Phil Labonte]

Look at that. That bottom one. That's the one that was like Sambo style, like, making fun of the dump. The crazy.

[Dudley Brown]

Wait a minute. You have a 1911 in here. You're a FUD.

[Tim Pool]

We. I think you're a fudge. I think Elmer Fudd is. Yeah, we got. We gotta get rid of Elmer Fudd too.

[Ronnie Adkins]

There you go.

[Tim Pool]

Look at that.

[Phil Labonte]

Because he's a dumb. A dumb white inbred.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, He's a caricature of white people. You can't have it. It's Right.

[Dudley Brown]

What does the Elmer Fudd say? Two world wars carries around 1911.

[Ian Crossland]

I don't think that Elmer Fudd actually has ever had a 1911.

[Tim Pool]

What's his backstory?

[Ronnie Adkins]

Isn't it always side by side or. Yeah, it's always been a side by side by side.

[Phil Labonte]

It's his backstory that he's a hillbilly hick that can't.

[Dudley Brown]

Hadn't.

[Phil Labonte]

Didn't get a lot of good nutrition. And I don't.

[Dudley Brown]

I don't know.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I'm gonna be. I'm gonna be honest, though. I mean, my favorite gun that I own is like a break action, single shot, 20 gauge. Though, just to be fair to Elmer Fudd, I unders. I get it, dude. You know?

[Tim Pool]

Well, you know, he's just on wabbits. You don't need anything crazy. You know what I mean? It's not the smartest animal, but apparently in his universe, they are. So there you go. No birds. But, you know, the idea that we have to get rid of Chief Wahoo because it's offensive to Native Americans, it's like, I don't know, literally every single cartoon ever that has a depiction like Homer Simpson. Now you got. Come on. Like, talk about mocking white people. You can't have that, can you?

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Homer. Oof. And he's the way Marge talks. Yeah. No, we got to ban everything that's offensive to anybody. Anybody for any reason at any point. So just nothing's allowed ever. You know, get ready with books. That's basically the plot to Fahrenheit 451.

[Phil Labonte]

We'Re trying to race history.

[Tim Pool]

No, the premise in Fahrenheit 51 is that. That everybody's offended by everything. So the government has to get rid of books to stop everyone from being offended.

[Phil Labonte]

I just don't think. I don't think getting rid of the past makes it not pop back up. You gotta at least know what happened. Like, there should be a monument. There probably is a monument.

[Tim Pool]

They tore all the statues down.

[Phil Labonte]

Remember Oahu?

[Tim Pool]

They tore down Frederick Douglass. They're just communists who want to destroy American history.

[Dudley Brown]

And the worst part is now they're all these new sports teams Don't. They don't know what to do. Like this new Utah Hockey club that moved from Arizona. You know, they don't know what to do. So what are they? The Utah Hockey Club.

[Ronnie Adkins]

That's just like the Washington football team, the Commanders.

[Tim Pool]

No. Is it. Their mascot's a pig, right?

[Ronnie Adkins]

No. So the Hogs, it goes all the way back to, like, the offensive line back in, like, the late 80s, early 90s. They were the Hogs. So it was like an unofficial mascot for them. Yeah, but when the Redskins changed their name the first time, they became the Washington football team.

[Ian Crossland]

Right.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Thank you for letting me know.

[Tim Pool]

Became the Commanders with their mascot being a pig. And everybody was laughing because it was literally the Commanders and a war pig was their mascot. So, you know, perfect.

[Dudley Brown]

Some Aussie.

[Ronnie Adkins]

They were trying. It was try. They were trying to do an ode back to the Hogs, and it was pretty poorly done.

[Phil Labonte]

You were saying the Atlanta Braves. They're still called the Braves.

[Tim Pool]

Chief Nakahoma was the mascot for the. For the Atlanta Braves from 66 to 85.

[Dudley Brown]

In the Tomahawk chop. Come on. That was cool.

[Phil Labonte]

The tomahawk chop.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean, again, I'm. I'm a hockey guy. What the heck do I know about baseball? Pull. Pull up. The Chicago Blackhawks still. And I'm not.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

I'm not a Dirty Birds fan, but that's still one of the most iconic logos and. And sports uniforms in all of.

[Tim Pool]

Look at that. 1926.

[Dudley Brown]

It's a very.

[Tim Pool]

You know, it's been the same. Isn't it kind of funny that Americans just love the Native Americans for sporting teams?

[Phil Labonte]

They were completely.

[Tim Pool]

Indians, the Redskins, the Blackhawks.

[Phil Labonte]

To the death kind of people, you know, a lot of them.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. Tremendous respect from people in the United States. Well, yeah. They still said the Utes.

[Phil Labonte]

Utah was like a tribe. Utes was the name of state after the Tribe. That's. That's impressive. I mean, you don't want to erase history. That's what the Romans would have just the commies do.

[Tim Pool]

The commies want to erase history? That's kind of their thing.

[Ian Crossland]

That's completely their thing.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, but you don't want to mock, I mean, the people that you've subjugated either. So I kind of understand.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean, I, I was. I always said hockey won't go that way because, you know, we still love hiding, fighting in hockey and. And at least it'll be a safe haven. And then they started doing pride week and all that garbage.

[Phil Labonte]

And I think the Blackhawks are safe because that's a cool picture. And is the Blackhawk Tribe, is that the name of the tribe?

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, I think so.

[Phil Labonte]

It's a respectable name with.

[Tim Pool]

With this shift. I was saying. I was saying a few years ago that if the wokeness trend continues, we would eventually see co ed professional leagues. The argument would be made that there's no reason the rules are arbitrary. We decide what the rules are. The game. We could easily decide. The rules should be half men, half women. Every team must have an equal amount of men and women playing, and they have to have equal time in the court, in the field, whatever it is. If wokeness continued, I think that's the. That would be the outcome. They would be like, no, no, no, we don't have enough diversity in these major league sports now that they've been crushed and defeated. What we're seeing with the revival of the Redskins logo, I think it's actually starting to go the other way. I think people generally just didn't like watching males beat women in their own sporting events, and it's causing a lot of controversy. The Wall Street Journal called it a sleeper issue in this election. One woman interviewed by the New York Times said it radicalized her into voting for Trump because even though he's psychotic, he seems more normal.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean, when Martin. Martina Navratilova.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

Long the lead lesbian, you know, in professional sports, as a tennis player, came out and said, this is wrong. Women should compete against women, period. Where biologically, you know, who cares if you're butchy like she is, but you're a woman. That's what your chromosomes say.

[Tim Pool]

But you see, you guys, you guys see the Bill Maher thing with Neil DeGrasse Tyson?

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

I saw clips.

[Tim Pool]

So if you go back a year, Neil DeGrasse Tyson kept arguing in favor of males competing against women, saying maybe we should just. Just make a different determination as to how we, you know, have different competition between different People. And everyone's like, yes, men versus women. And then, wait, class at next question and skill. And he kept saying it. Now that he knows, on the wrong side of this, Bill Maher was just ripping into him. And he was like, come on, you're the guy who couldn't tell me why the WNBA couldn't beat the Lakers. And so, you know, he got absolutely just annihilated on the show. Yeah. Because everyone. Everyone's so just done with it.

[Dudley Brown]

I'm kind of like, I'm a. I'm a Biller fan. I mean, the guy's just hilarious.

[Phil Labonte]

And I was.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, if you read the news, I'd have more respect for him.

[Phil Labonte]

I like Neil DeGrasse Tyson in 2007 when he was like, hey, everyone, let's focus on science. Regardless of your feelings, let's focus on science. I thought, that's very cool that this dude is coming out of nowhere and he's talking about science. But, man, I don't normally rip on people when they're not around, but that guy is totally.

[Tim Pool]

Neil DeGrasse Tyson is one of the worst.

[Phil Labonte]

He's so annoying. He's so full of himself. He let his ego get to his head. He thinks he's great.

[Tim Pool]

He's anti science.

[Phil Labonte]

He reads in an echo chamber.

[Tim Pool]

Persona is consensus, not science.

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah, exactly.

[Tim Pool]

He represents consensus crap that he hears.

[Phil Labonte]

From his peers without going outside of his own ego. It's disturbing.

[Tim Pool]

He wants to see himself on the lips in a mirror.

[Dudley Brown]

I want a Jordan Peterson, Tyson grass cage back.

[Phil Labonte]

Force him to debate.

[Ronnie Adkins]

My issue is that he aligns his expertise to things that he has no claimed expertise.

[Tim Pool]

All right, like.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Like Bill Nye, too, certainly, you know, so people that. People that you know are speaking out because they're renowned experts in a certain field, you know, in other fields that, you know, don't really relate. It's like, you know, apples versus a book of matches. Like, that's two very different things. We're gonna.

[Phil Labonte]

That's what Bill Maher's ripping him on. He's like, you're a physicist. Why you can't talk about public health like you have any kind of credentials. He's like, but I'm a scientist, Bill.

[Tim Pool]

We're gonna go to super chat. So if you haven't already, would you kindly smash that, like, button? Share the show with everyone you know, literally everyone, and become a member by going to Tim cast and clicking. Join us. We're gonna have a members only, uncensored show where we go deep into the lore of guns and their infringements. And the gentleman. We have. We. We have with us know all about that. They were there when it was written. All right, we're going to grab some super chats. And it's not an age joke. It's a. It's a.

[Dudley Brown]

Yes, it was.

[Tim Pool]

No, it's.

[Dudley Brown]

It was.

[Tim Pool]

It's an ASLAN joke from. What's that book called? Narnia Chronicles of Narnia. There you go. He was like, do not psychic. Like the dark magic to me, which I was there. Whatever.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I use that meme a lot when I'm responding.

[Ian Crossland]

That was there when it was written.

[Tim Pool]

All right, all right.

[Dudley Brown]

So all my. All my members are, like, posting on Twitter. Come on, get Tim talking about guns. Let's talk about guns.

[Phil Labonte]

We should touch on in this show a little bit during super chats because you're running one of the. Probably the best, the number one charity on the planet that's supporting individual gun.

[Tim Pool]

Let's grab some super chats and then we'll grab some gun questions.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So we got Hal Gailey saying NAGR has always had the best patch and hats.

[Dudley Brown]

Hey.

[Tim Pool]

Well, there you go.

[Dudley Brown]

And we've redesigned some of our stuff. You can see on Ronnie's. The logo on Ronnie's shirt, we got two different logos, but one of them, we just replaced it. There's a Brown Bess on one side, which is the weapon used in our Revolutionary War by both sides, really. And then the other one is a Nemo arms 6.5 Creedmoor Exo carbon rifle. I actually, that's my rifle with a burr scope on it and a Thunder Beast suppressor. And, like, I just decked it out and then took the pick. Get my art, guys? Do the picture, Mike. Yeah, that's a cool gun to put on there because we didn't want to just put an ar.

[Ian Crossland]

Right. That's boring.

[Tim Pool]

Here we go. We got Emperor's Champion saying, I get the feeling the NFA and GCA will be replaced in the next five years or so. What is your opinion on that?

[Dudley Brown]

Good luck getting through Congress. And I'm saying this from a federal lobbyist who. Who's been doing it for a while and would love to do that. I think we're gonna do it in the courts. All you have to do is prove common use and that weapons are just unusual or dangerous. They have to prove that. Sorry. They have to prove that they are. They are either dangerous or unusual in courts, and they can't.

[Tim Pool]

I disagree.

[Dudley Brown]

Because they're. They are. They are actually usual. An AR15 is more common than the Ford F150 truck.

[Tim Pool]

I agree with your assessment of what you need to prove, but I disagree with that being the standard. And if I was on the Supreme Court, I'd say all guns legal. There will be no infringements. There can be no law returning any weapon of any type, period. Thank you. And have a nice.

[Dudley Brown]

I would do that, too. But they're not going to make things up. They have to look back and look at previous decisions. And the great part was they've got Heller.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I'd look at that.

[Dudley Brown]

They got Heller and then McDonald and then, of course, now they have Bruin and they can go back to the original intent. And.

[Tim Pool]

And when they had privateers and Corsairs with cannons and grapeshot, they'd say the intention of the Founding Fathers was sometimes you hire dudes with warships. Private individuals can have warships of mark. Absolutely. And nothing has changed by today's standards, except for the technology. But that is not grounds for restricting a right. The states will have to amend the Constitution. Ergo, you can have nukes. You can have.

[Ronnie Adkins]

What's the realistic possibility of something like that happening, though? Right? So. So you have.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, these people are all cowards.

[Ronnie Adkins]

You have the. But see, that's. That's kind of my point.

[Dudley Brown]

Right.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So you have this more.

[Dudley Brown]

I have more faith, actually, in the Supreme Court. I actually think they're waiting for. We know for a fact that Justice Thomas and Alito are waiting for a case that would. That after it's gone through its interlocutory appeals. And that's just a fancy way that my attorneys tell me, and I'm not an attorney, you know, they tell me it's all these little motions, but then they get to the merits of a case. And in the post Bruin world, if the Supreme Court will take the merits of a case that are broad, like they may on the Maryland assault weapons ban, which is the Snope case, if they do, they probably rip apart every single restriction in America Magazine bans assault weapons bans, any ridiculous notions of pistol braces and bump stocks. And. Sorry, both parties are complicit in that and many of those. And forced reset triggers, if you've ever seen that issue.

[Tim Pool]

That quote they say from Trump about banning bump stops and banning guns was fake. Right. So I. So I've heard Luke say this over and over again about how Trump said, I go for the guns first and then go to the courts later. That's a fake quote. That's not real.

[Dudley Brown]

You're sorry. That is A live recording. I watched it live context.

[Tim Pool]

And he wasn't saying literally I watched the whole thing.

[Dudley Brown]

I had people in the room. That is not true. Donald Trump was, was terrible on guns. But of course Kamala Harris was worse and of course Joe Biden is worse. But in terms of taking steps in the wrong direction, the big thing that was really bad about the bump stocks, I don't own bump stock. I own real machine guns. I think bump stocks are kind of lame, but, but I don't want to ban them. And, and I don't think it, it's going to save any lives whatsoever. However, the, the problem was it was an executive action that Donald Trump took to ban an entire class of AR15 part. And that's the exact same map that Joe Biden used to ban pistol braces. And both of them are wrong. Both lost and well, ultimately they lost. But it was very, very close and at times. And the simple fact is that is what politicians will do. My job as a gun lobbyist is to hold the ground and hold people accountable. The politicians must be held accountable from both parties and they can't get away with just saying things and pushing things, pushing for restrictions on suppressors. Trump did that. He did that when he was in the UK and many of the things that of course Joe Biden tried all the way back to Barack Obama, we stopped them. Everyone said you couldn't stop Barack Obama after the Newtown, Connecticut shootings. And we did. In fact, the NRA stood on the sidelines and gave padded Harry Reid, a member of the Democrat leader of the Senate, patted him on the head and gave him the highest ratings. And then they gave John Cornyn their highest rating even though he ran the red flag law in Congress and right at the same time as the Bruin decision. 22.

[Tim Pool]

Let's grab some more super chats. We got I'm not your buddy guy saying it's short sighted to say institutions are beyond reproach and to maintain civilization, we must do everything to maintain them. This is how you get to abuse of authority as we have all lived through. Accountability is necessary.

[Dudley Brown]

We agree with that. We actually agree. So I'm not sure you took me in context, but I just believe that at some point you have to trust institutions. And I mean most people. I saw some articles that said Americans believe that this was a fair election in 2024. It sure seemed like we had a lot more people watching, paying attention to the, the potential of fraud and election abuse. And. But we do have to have some faith in our institutions because that is what we built as a country.

[Tim Pool]

But faith is not meant to be blind. So in 2020, when Trump won all the bellwethers and lost, people had questions. How is this possible? Understand Then in 2024, when Trump wins all the bellwethers, and I mean most of them and then wins, people are like, what is happening?

[Dudley Brown]

No, he won all of. Of all the swing states.

[Tim Pool]

Also. The bellwethers, the counties that overwhelmingly. They always. The counties are the bellwether counties that always in majority, like great majority. It's like 19 counties, 17 or so will always vote for the winner. Whoever they vote for ends up winning the election. And you go back, all these different elections, you can see them. They were accurate up till 2020, and then everybody had questions, and then in 2024, they were back to being accurate. Yeah, 2020, everything was busted and it didn't make sense.

[Dudley Brown]

I think. I think 2020 was pretty busted anyway. I mean, we were dealing with all mail ballot and. Which I don't like. I live. I live in Colorado where they've been trying to do mail in ballots. They started that, what, 18 years ago, I think, and doing all mail ballots. And it's a disaster. But unfortunately, I think it's here to stay. If we could ever change it, we should.

[Tim Pool]

All right, we got the text vet. He says if tariffs make things $3 more expensive. But him slashing taxes lets me keep $4. That good is $1 saved, let alone all the jobs that are created here. Keeping money in the US Instead of going to China or India. I work in bank. So Donald Trump was talking about potentially getting rid of the income tax in favor of tariffs. Like it was way, way back in the day. I don't see that as being reality. That's a. That's. That's not just a heavy lift that's trying to knock over a skyscraper with a hammer.

[Dudley Brown]

I always worry about. The cynic in me worries that it. It means tariffs and. Yeah, always, Always. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Tim Pool]

It's like we're only going to increase Texas by a little bit, and then 100 years later, it's 37.5.

[Dudley Brown]

Or it's only temporary.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Dudley Brown]

How many people live in a municipality that says, we're going to just temporarily increase the taxes? Yeah. Any of those gone? Nope. Nope.

[Ronnie Adkins]

How many times have we temporarily increased the taxes at this point?

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah. Basically every time. It was temporary just for this war. Well. And then just for this one. Well, now we just don't declare the wars. It's just permanent. And we're all under states of emergency, too. All right, Clark. Christo says I'm overwhelmed. I take care of my mom, brother, sister, and nephew, and I only make $21 an hour. None of them will get a job. Yikes.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, man, Time for some ultimatums.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I think you gotta maybe stop enabling. For real? Yeah. You know, how old's your nephew? If he's, like. If he's a little kid, then I get it. But for the people who refuse to get jobs, you just gotta say, nana, why won't you get a job?

[Phil Labonte]

You know, one thing you can do is help them with half of their bills.

[Tim Pool]

If they get a job, I. Or. Or you can say goodbye.

[Phil Labonte]

You can also kick them out of your life. But if you want to help them, literally, sometimes, like my mom, it was something she did with me. She's like, look, you. You can get no job and you're all on your own. Or if you get a job, I'll help you out with half your rent. So I got a job. It was like a double, double win. And then I got a job.

[Tim Pool]

All right, let's see the text that says, this dude's a lobbyist talking about collective bargaining being uncompetitive. Talk about a pot calling a kettle black. And all his trashing of unions is same to lobbyists. I don't think that. I don't think all lobbyists are the same. I think they're associating with, like, a big corporation.

[Dudley Brown]

I'd love to make the kind of money most traditional lobbyists make. I turned that down a long time ago.

[Tim Pool]

Well, let's. Let's clarify what lobbying is, too. Like, if I personally go to a representative from Congress and say, hey, man, we should be allowed to carry weapons, I think you should do something. I'm lobbying them.

[Dudley Brown]

Well, you don't have to actually register as a lobbyist to do that. Yeah, there are some thresholds in which if you're being paid to go and represent people. You know, I represent millions of members who ask me to do this. And I'm not the only lobbyist. I have. We have a score of federal lobbyists and work for nagr, and then we lobby in states. I think I've lobbied 31 states legislatures and then Congress at some form or another. And some states have all little different requirements. The term comes. Lobbying means you sat in the lobby outside the legislative body and, you know, talked to legislators as they came in and out. But because it's a controversial issue, it's a very different type of lobbying. I always look at myself as. You know, we don't wear Gucci loafers and take people out for $500 dinners. We literally deliver pressure from members, grassroots pressure, and tell the politician, these are our people. We deliver the pet petitions saying, we want you to vote this way. Thomas Massie and I delivered 1.4 million petitions, physical petitions, into the US Capitol several years ago opposing Red Flag.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think people should have the right to own nuclear weapons?

[Dudley Brown]

No.

[Tim Pool]

Why not?

[Dudley Brown]

Well, I'm going to stick with the Second Amendment and my knowledge. And again, I'm no academic. I don't even pretend to be. I'm a bare knuckles brawler in politics. It's all I know how to do legitimately. But I do know that the Second Amendment was written to protect the rights of individuals for small arms. It didn't say, I'm not opposed to people owning artillery pieces. I have friends with an anti tank gun, World War II anti tank gun. I've got. I know lots of people with stuff like that, but. So the Second Amendment actually applies to small arms.

[Tim Pool]

So, so what you're saying is when back then people did own cannons and warships, they were basically saying, yeah, yeah, yeah, like that can't. It's, it's legal now, but if they want, we could ban it. You can't have those things.

[Dudley Brown]

I don't know.

[Tim Pool]

Because you can still have cannons.

[Dudley Brown]

I mean, I wish I'd said I knew. I don't honestly know about why they wrote what they wrote. I was listening to a podcast, irl, just from a couple days ago, and you guys were talking about that and Christianity, right, With Milo, which was a very interesting, fascinating discussion.

[Tim Pool]

But Article 4 of the 17 articles, I think.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, so, so, but I will say that. Remember the Miller case? You guys familiar with the Miller case? That was the seminal court case the Supreme Court ruled on or kind of didn't rule. But Miller set the, the tone. And this was Miller's an interesting case in that it was a couple of moonshiners who got caught with a still, but there was no alcohol in the still and the revenuer had to charge him with something. So they. Pat. They charged him with a violation in 1934, National Firearms act because they had a short shotgun. And here's the problem. They appealed it and they kept going. The decision kept going up the court and what their defense was. This shotgun was used by the military and therefore by an infantryman in the military. It was standard that they would use it and therefore we get to own it. Because the Second Amendment Says so. And they got all the way up the U.S. supreme Court and guess what they are moonshiners. They didn't show up.

[Tim Pool]

You know what's funny? I just pulled up the Bill of Rights, Wikipedia, not that it's a great source, but it says the Federalists were concerned the Bill of Rights would actually create procedural uncertainties and that the states could guarantee rights better. Who cared? The federal government wasn't that strong. And that's a horrifying thing because especially after the Civil War, this country became under the boot of the federal government who then decides what you can and can't do. So thank the heavens for the Bill of Rights.

[Dudley Brown]

Yeah, so. But the Bill of Rights really covers small arms. And I like the joke. I mean we make that joke with politicians when they're, we're vetting them before they run for office. We ask them are you what, what's your stance on guns? And a couple of them said tank in every garage. And it's a great joke. But, and I'm. But the second Amendment actually doesn't cover.

[Tim Pool]

So clarification. It was, it was the fifth article in the first iteration of the 17 articles ultimately ended with the Second Amendment which stated a well regulated militia composed of the body of the people being the best security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But no one religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.

[Phil Labonte]

It doesn't say anything about small arms. Why do you think it means small arms?

[Dudley Brown]

But by the debates and the records we have of the second Amendment during the Bill of Rights debate, that's where it came from. And I think we're going to end up up essentially finding out exactly where those limits are. And the question was repeal of the NFA and 68 Gun Control Act. And I believe we're going to end.

[Phil Labonte]

Up there because it kind of like.

[Dudley Brown]

That might be one of the lines we get to.

[Phil Labonte]

It's not really about size, it's about explosive force. And that just indicates electrical power because if you have enough physical electricity you can create like a rail cannon that can go through solid steel. And like it's not. Where does the line start? It starts to blur with energy.

[Dudley Brown]

That's a good question. I do believe it's going to stop where infantryman carries an M4.

[Ian Crossland]

Well so if that's the case you would include, you know, all belt fed man portable even if they're team. Correct.

[Dudley Brown]

I like the way you think, Phil.

[Ian Crossland]

I mean, you know, saws and 240, they all would be considered, you know, small arms.

[Ronnie Adkins]

I mean.

[Dudley Brown]

Darn right.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So for me, when you, when you start to talk about small arms, the terms small and big are relative. And I'm happy that they are. But you know, I mean, Dudley is. He's. He's the president of nagr. I'm relatively new to the team. I've only been here for about a month. And the guy taught me to shoot extreme long range. Had me shooting and hitting at over 1800 yards the first time. Really trying that. He's a shooter. We might personally disagree on where the boundaries of the second amendment are. But what I'm learning though is that he. He better knows the levers necessary to apply and enact change. So I think that's one of the things that kind of always drew me to nagr.

[Tim Pool]

So I can only look this thing up so far. The Virginia Constitution, one of the precursors of the second Amendment, says that keep among us in times of peace standing armies and ships of war affecting to render the military independent of and superior to the civil power.

[Phil Labonte]

Standing armies and ships. Say that one more time.

[Ronnie Adkins]

That was cool.

[Tim Pool]

And they have the Declaration of Rights. That a well regulated militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms is the proper, natural and safe defense of a free state. That standing armings and armies in times of peace should be avoided as dangerous to liberty. And that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination and governed by the civil power. Ships of war. That was the Virginia Constitution. And so then you have Pennsylvania. That the right of the people to keep and bear arms are defense of themselves in the state. That standing armings in times of peace are dangerous to liberty. They ought not to be kept up. And that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power. That's interesting.

[Dudley Brown]

Remember you had privateers.

[Ian Crossland]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

And Corsair. Yeah.

[Dudley Brown]

Private warships who supplemented the civil powers and. Or rebelled against the civil powers or however you look at it. Some of it, of course, was what. What really kicked off a revolution. What started a revolution.

[Tim Pool]

It wasn't they're trying to seize the guns.

[Dudley Brown]

They were trying to seize the guns and mass unconquered. And by the way, a place where you can't actually carry guns on Springfield had to leave.

[Ian Crossland]

Yes.

[Tim Pool]

Crazy.

[Dudley Brown]

They had.

[Ian Crossland]

That's why I don't live in Massachusetts anymore. Or that's one of the major reasons why I don't live in Massachusetts anymore.

[Tim Pool]

So I would Argue that if. So, we've got Vermont, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Maryland, Virginia, all of these. They're all saying standing armies should not be kept because they are dangerous to peace. The civilian population must be trained and armed. How could you actually defend the state if these people did not have cannons?

[Ian Crossland]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So. Well.

[Dudley Brown]

And you can, of course have cannons now. I mean, black powder cannons. Yeah, you always could. And bowling ball mortar. You ever seen one of those? You can literally make out of an acetylene tank and make a. A mortar. Just cut the end off. It's legal. And you could shoot bowling balls with black powder. And I'm telling you, it's so much fun.

[Tim Pool]

It may not be legal in your area. Consult your local law.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Free Syrian Army.

[Tim Pool]

Don't. Don't do that at home.

[Dudley Brown]

Believe it.

[Tim Pool]

All right, here we go. The text vet says it takes money to sue, and most people don't have the money to go against multi million dollar lawyers. That is why you can't win against government. Just sue is an elitist position reserved for people too out of touch.

[Dudley Brown]

I'm an elitist, apparently.

[Tim Pool]

Wow. I don't think he's talking about you.

[Phil Labonte]

I think you also can enact class action if you really need to fund a.

[Dudley Brown]

Come on. If you've got a good case there, there are always lawyers who want to do it.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, yeah. The issue is that the government has infinite money.

[Dudley Brown]

Yes, that's correct. And so I know, Tim, right now our foundation has nine federal lawsuits against assault weapons ban magazine bans, the ATF's restriction on forced reset triggers. We're all over it. We're. And we know we're running against government.

[Tim Pool]

When are we going to see the Supreme Court rule on selective state weapons bans and overrule them and say you can't do that anymore?

[Dudley Brown]

There, that's where. Where it's probably going to be if they grant cert to Snopes. That's the Maryland assault weapons ban case. It's the one furthest along in. Good.

[Tim Pool]

Because Maryland's got the stupidest laws.

[Dudley Brown]

Yes. And it's furthest along in, in the, in the court system. Now, we had a case that was, that was being propelled quite quickly in. In Superior, Colorado, and it actually got wrapped up with the town of the city of Boulder and the county of Boulder. And we had four municipalities in one case, and it's an assault weapons ban and magazine ban in one little tiny town. And when they enacted it and then Bebruin decision happened, and so we're like, well, let's file suit against this little tiny town and make them defend it. Well of course it's Bloomberg's attorneys actually doing the defense. They fly in from New York for all the court cases. And so all we had to prove is. All we have to prove is common use. That an AR15 is in common use and therefore it's, it's not unusual.

[Tim Pool]

I think that's just a weird standard. But so, so I always complain about this because it's, it's. It happened to us in Maryland. M1As are illegal assault weapons. They're totally banned. Scar 20s totally legal. So Lucra Cassie comes by and he's like I have a scar 20s. And I'm like wow, that's really, really cool.

[Dudley Brown]

65 Creedmore.

[Tim Pool]

No, no, I think it was 308.

[Dudley Brown]

Right.

[Tim Pool]

And justification for that? Well, because they're insane people who don't know what they're talking about.

[Dudley Brown]

They wrote the, they were by definition restriction instead of a broad, you know, certain categories. And, and so the, the scar twenties was not out when they wrote the band.

[Tim Pool]

No, that's.

[Dudley Brown]

That was true. That was true. That was true of a lot of states. Will they. They don't write it but this the quote smart ones. Are there any smart commies. We. They write it. They write those bands to say oh well it's got a pistol grip and it's magazine fed. And some of them they go just go way over the line 76 2.

[Tim Pool]

But I think that's largely indistinguishable when you're proving usuality. And the scar 20s I think 7762 is what. I think that's what Luke had.

[Ronnie Adkins]

If it's a 308765 51.

[Ian Crossland]

Right.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Yeah. Okay.

[Dudley Brown]

When you're.

[Tim Pool]

But I. But the guy at my gun store is like don't mix them up because one goes one way the other. But because the pressure is different or whatever.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Ronnie Adkins]

So the pressures are different between like the NATO 762 by 51 and like.

[Tim Pool]

You can, but not.

[Dudley Brown]

Okay. I thought, I thought the 20s designation was. Was just 65 Creedmoor actually is both.

[Tim Pool]

That that was the issue. I think we were both using 762 and I was like why is this with a 10 round magazine illegal as an assault weapon with iron sights. And then Luke's got this modern weapon with you know, a 30 round magazine and it's totally fine. They don't care. It's because they have no idea what they're talking about. The laws make no sense and they're insane people because well, unfortunately here's the.

[Dudley Brown]

Problem is sometimes our people become technocrats and they go and explain to the commies how to go ahead and change that their bills and they do that.

[Tim Pool]

Let's, let's, let's talk about this in the members only portion. We'll go crazy on guns. So smash that like button. Share the show with everyone. You know. We are going to talk big guns over on the members only show right now. So go to timcast.com click join us if you want to watch, if you want to watch that uncensored portion of the show. Of course there are certain things on YouTube they don't allow. So we, you know, we won't do those things. But maybe, maybe in the members only we can get a little spicy for you guys. So again, timcast.com you can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast and Dudley, you want to shout anything out.

[Dudley Brown]

We would love to have you sign up for our email address. Our email communications are our fastest way to get you involved in the fight for your second amendment rights. And right now we're doing our very best to hold people accountable. We didn't talk about Pam Bondi the new potential new ag and she's got a long history of support and red flag. We need to hold her accountable as she may get confirmed. But join [e-mail] we're the group fighting for you in the trenches in your state capitals and in Washington D.C. and we'd love to have you.

[Tim Pool]

Right on.

[Ronnie Adkins]

No, I just echo what Dudley said. Again, I'm relatively new to the gun rights team team. I joined it for a reason. My work at Funker 530 has really sustained me. It's, you know, what I've been doing now for quite a few years and I was enamored with the work that's happening behind the scenes. And I chose to work at NAGR specifically because of the people, because they're shooters. Because Dudley's out on the ground with me by himself working booths trying to talk to people, help people understand exactly what's happening behind the scenes. So, so I would just echo what Dudley said.

[Tim Pool]

Right on.

[Phil Labonte]

Ronnie Adkins, ladies and gentlemen. Ladies and gentlemen. And shout you guys both out on X. It's Dudley W. Brown and Ronnie Adkins with a D underscore. Ronnie Adkins underscore.

[Ronnie Adkins]

That's me, brother.

[Phil Labonte]

Dude, I appreciate you guys for coming, man. We didn't touch too much into Funker, but that kind of really opened my eyes to some battlefield trauma. I mean getting, getting the fight from the perspective of the soldier, getting that.

[Ronnie Adkins]

Getting that reality out there to people so they better understand it and make better decisions around his ultimate. The mission there.

[Dudley Brown]

Thank you.

[Phil Labonte]

Absolutely great to see you guys. And I'm at Ian Cross on. Follow me there. I'll catch you later.

[Ian Crossland]

I am Phil that remains on Twix where you can subscribe to my ex account. I'm Philip Remains official on Instagram. The band is all that remains. You can check out our new videos. It's the words. There's one for forever cold let you go no tomorrow divine. They're all available on YouTube, Amazon Music, Apple Music, Spotify, Pandora and Deezer. And don't forget the left lane is for crime.

[Tim Pool]

We will see you all [e-mail] in about a minute. Let's talk guns. We'll see you all over. We'll see you all there.