Trump Deploys 2000 Feds To MN Over FRAUD, Democrat ADMITS Somali Daycare Fraud IS REAL w/ Lectern Guy

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: Timcast IRL — Trump Deploys 2000 Feds To MN Over Fraud, Democrat ADMITS Somali Daycare Fraud IS REAL w/ Lectern Guy

Date: January 7, 2026
Host: Tim Pool (Timcast Media)
Guests: Adam Johnson (“Lectern Guy”), Graham Allen, Phil Labonte, Tate Brown

---

Episode Overview

This episode centers on several interconnected high-stakes political issues:

• President Trump’s deployment of 2,000 federal agents to Minnesota to address immigration and alleged Somali daycare fraud
• The public acknowledgment by a prominent Democrat’s daughter that daycare fraud is real
• Internal fractures and infighting on the political right—particularly surrounding figures like Dan Bongino and Candace Owens
• Discussion of Trump’s intervention in Venezuela’s oil industry
• Broader reflections on controlled opposition, influence operations, the future of American politics, and the difficulty of real-world political change

As always, the show features Tim Pool’s trademark skepticism of both press narratives and “grifter” influencer culture, emphasizing the challenges facing both the right and left in contemporary America.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Trump’s Minnesota Action & Somali Daycare Fraud Scandal

• [00:09–09:45]
  • President Trump sends 2,000 federal agents to Minnesota in response to allegations of significant immigration and daycare fraud, particularly in the Somali community.
  • Tim Pool highlights media framing: “CNN just peppers the lies into these stories… At the same time, you get the daughter of the Democrat resigning, being like, yeah, it's basically happening.”
  • Reference to Tim Walz’s daughter, Hope, publicly admitting there’s truth in the fraud allegations amidst her father’s resignation from the governor’s race.

2. Infighting & Realignment on the Political Right

• [09:46–23:58]
  • Frustration among right-wing influencers and audiences; suspicious, sudden shifts against Dan Bongino and Trump.
  • Pool and guests argue this is being encouraged/manipulated by Big Tech and promoted influencers (specifically Candace Owens) to fracture and destabilize the populist right.
  • Notable quote (Tim at [12:55]):
    “Big tech and prominent influencers like Candace Owens are intentionally trying to destroy the right... It destroys the right populist movement in a midterm year, which we're entering, and Trump's gonna get impeached... one by one, these retards march in lockstep with her crackpot worldview.”
  • Guests pose that outrage is easier to market/clickbait than nuanced political progress.

3. The Role of Social Media & Controlled Opposition

• Throughout, notably [15:47], [18:17], [32:48]
  • Pool suspects algorithmic manipulation: influencers who break platform rules are elevated to sow discord.
  • Discussion on how normies/suburban voters (“people who just want to buy diapers”) are pushed away by conspiratorial, extreme rhetoric ("Ze Jews", Venezuela for Zionists).
  • [25:21–26:52]: Tim observes Candace Owens showing up unsolicited in his X (Twitter) feed as evidence of algorithmic boosting; guests agree that "rage bait" dominates the current media environment.

4. Political Realignment, Media Narratives, and Civilizational Stakes

• [18:17], [28:00], [32:48], [42:15]
  • The right is fracturing severely, not only among grassroots but at the level of staff, influencers, and institutions (e.g., Turning Point USA after Charlie Kirk’s assassination).
  • “Controlled opposition” theory—Democrats and Big Tech no longer favor outright censorship, but instead seek to “infect” opposition movements with disruptive personalities, poor narratives, and grifter culture.
  • Tim Pool: “The Democrats are gonna win in the midterms. Trump will be impeached.”

5. Venezuela Oil Story: Is America’s Foreign Policy Changing?

• [34:38–44:48]
  • Trump announces (via Truth Social) the U.S. will seize millions of barrels of Venezuelan oil—reopening debates over regime change, resource control, and American self-interest.
  • Tate Brown explains: “You flood the market with cheap oil... This is how you conduct the geopolitical affairs. This is Geopolitics 101.” ([40:58])
  • Nuanced debate: guests distinguish between necessary realpolitik and outright imperialism, arguing for a measured but pragmatic foreign policy.

6. Political Nihilism, Current Events Fatigue, and Generational Trends

• [51:43–61:27]
  • Frustration at endless cycles of political disappointment—Epstein files, border security, corruption, and the lack of major breakthroughs or accountability.
  • Pool and guests muse on public cynicism, especially among Gen Z: “90% of Zoomers, ballpark, are either nihilist or political extremists.” ([59:58])
  • Real-world disconnect: what is salient online among influencers often has no resonance in average people's daily lives.

7. The Moral Dilemmas of Political Change

• [61:27–76:01]
  • Extended trolley-problem debate on the costs of releasing incriminating information (e.g., the Epstein list):
    “Would you expose a pedophile if it meant your daughter would be killed? 99% wouldn’t—not because they’re bad people, but because these are the impossible choices of power.”
  • Adam Johnson (“Lectern Guy”) and Graham Allen emphasize the generational, incremental nature of the political struggle.
  • The “deep state”/machine argument—changing the system means facing tradeoffs, hard realities, and would likely destroy the lives of people who try.

8. What Are We Even Fighting For? Disillusionment & Factionalism

• [88:58–94:00]
  • Tim Pool questions the long-term value of his activism, given betrayal from former allies, leftist violence, and a right fractured by grift and extremism.
  • “Is the time and energy I'm spending doing this and the risks accrued actually going to be a net benefit for my kids? I don't believe that if the right moves in the direction of Candace Owens it will be something worth preserving or making happen in the future.”
  • Questions persist: If both left and right offer only extremes, grift, or absurdity, what future is actually being built? Who is really “the right” worth fighting for?

9. The Spectacle of January 6th, Five Years Later

• [49:03–83:23]
  • Discussion of Democrats’ candlelight vigil for J6; the absurdity of ongoing media and activist narratives.
  • Adam Johnson recounts his experience, real consequences, and ongoing misconceptions:
    “Let's talk about a myth that's still perpetuated. ...I didn't steal the lectern.” ([50:03])
  • Broader point: the J6 prosecutions and media posture serve as warnings—“don’t try this again or we’ll destroy you.”

10. Conspiracies, Influence, & Pragmatic Governance

• [105:26–109:27]
  • Elites use distraction (“it’s the Jews!”) to divert attention from globalist realpolitik and the Western-dominated international order.
  • Pool and guests make the case for fighting real conspiracies (World Economic Forum, Davos, Council on Foreign Relations) rather than falling for shallow populist tropes (“Ze Jews”).
  • Final message: the fight is generational, and victory requires discipline, focus, and unity—otherwise, Americans face increasing repression, losing ground as globalist institutions further entrench their power.

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

• Tim Pool [12:55]:
  “Big tech and prominent influencers like Candace Owens are intentionally trying to destroy the right... they’re destabilizing the right... I’m really happy about what’s going on, but for some reason I go on X and all of these... prominent right wing people have flipped on a dime. …It’s the Jews. And I’m just like, I don’t understand.”

• Tate Brown [40:58]:
  “Do you know how you defeat Russia? You flood the market with cheap oil and you force them to bring their oil price down. That will destroy their economy... This is Geopolitics 101.”

• Graham Allen [47:44]:
  “They’ve been seeking to overhaul the demographic of the United States... they want it more than we do.”

• Adam Johnson “Lectern Guy” [80:33]:
  “January 6th, there were about 1,600 people that were willing to risk their freedom to speak up... The entire reason they’re still doing this is to remind you we will come after you if you ever do this again.”

• Tim Pool [94:00]:
  “It's kind of disheartening. Were we actually fighting for a better country, or were y'all just trying to get a bag?”

• Phil Labonte [96:38]:
  “Principle is a way to say, well, you know, we lost and it's an excuse for losing. We live in the real politic world. So the important thing is victory… running the scoreboard up on your side is the only thing that matters.”

• Tim Pool [105:26]:
  “…these are international forces… NATO, the Western powers… not pro-America. And because of people like that, that's why we struggle to form a coalition and actually go against them.”

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• Trump deploys feds to MN & Somali daycare fraud:
  [00:09–09:45]

• Right-wing infighting, Candace Owens, and influencer wars:
  [09:46–23:58]

• Conspiracies, controlled opposition, the role of Big Tech:
  [15:47, 18:17, 25:21, 32:48]

• Venezuela oil seizure & U.S. foreign policy:
  [34:38–44:48]

• J6 anniversary: Democrats’ vigil and media spectacle:
  [49:03–54:00]

• The morality of whistleblowing, Epstein files debate, and the impossibility of “total victory” in politics:
  [61:27–76:01]

• Generational struggle, nihilism, collapse of American optimism:
  [80:33–94:00]

• Is the right even worth fighting for? Betrayals and the “bag” culture:
  [94:00–97:23]

• Broader reflections on international order, distraction, and systemic change:
  [105:26–109:27]

---

Episode Tone and Style

• Uncensored, irreverent, and hyper-skeptical. Frequent use of frank and coarse language, especially from Tim and Adam.
• Constant mix of dark humor and urgent activism; strong undercurrent of paranoia about disinformation and elite manipulation.
• Appeals to “real America,” working class values, and generational struggle.

---

Conclusion

This episode of Timcast IRL provides a sweeping, raw, and contentious look at the state of American politics in early 2026. The show’s hosts and guests dissect current events—Trump’s law enforcement actions in Minnesota, Democratic admissions of fraud, and media narratives—while offering a meta-commentary on the dissolution of political trust, influencer culture, and factionalism on the American right. The episode’s candid, combative exchanges serve both as a rallying cry and a cautionary tale for listeners seeking clarity and direction in an era of continuous, often manufactured, outrage.

---

Transcript

[A]

Donald Trump is sending 2,000 federal agents into Minnesota over the immigration problems, the fraud cases. There's even been rumors floating for some time now that they could denaturalize and deport Ilhan Omar because the White House themselves tweeted, she married her brother. That's immigration fraud. And the law is clear. If you commit immigration fraud, they can denaturalize and deport. We'll talk about that then. Tim Waltz's daughter has come out in a podcast and admitted, yeah, there's Somali daycare fraud going on in the state. So it's funny that all these liberals rushed out to defend these daycares saying, what do you mean? They're all totally legitimate? And then she's like, well, my dad's resigning, but yeah, there's enough truth to that that, you know, it's actually happening. And then Donald Trump putting out a truth post saying that we're gonna take large quantities of oil from Venezuela and sell it and he's gonna be the one managing the money because you gotta make sure it's done right. But of course, it was always about the oil. The question is, is it good for America? And there's a big question in this as to how the right has been reacting to the actions of Donald Trump and to each other, to be completely honest. Cuz there is of course, this civil war among the right with various personalities fracturing off into different factions at the same time. What I absolutely love about this Venezuela story is corporate press, some of which are still attacking Trump no matter what he does is wrong. Some of which have gone rather neutral and are now just saying, Trump, the president, you know, took out the president of Venezuela and is going to take their oil. Instead of saying, you know, Trump comma, convicted sex offender and fraudster, they're running it neutral, which you get it. Trump says, we're gonna go into a foreign country, we're gonna get that royal, there's gonna be war. And also the media is like a true president. So we'll talk about that and a whole lot more before we get started. My friends, I got a great sponsor for you. It is Crowd health. Go to joincrowdhealth.com check it out. My friends. Use join crowd how joincrowdhealth.com Tim promo code. Tim Friends, it's open enrollment. This isn't where health insurance companies hope you'll blindly sign up again for overpriced premiums and confusing fine print. Don't just take someone else's word. Trust yourself and take control of your future. With Crowd Health the healthcare alternative for people who make their own decisions. Healthcare. For under 100 bucks, you get access to a team of health bill negotiators, low cost prescription and lab testing tools, as well as a database of low cost, high quality doctors vetted by crowd health. And what if something major happens? You pay the first 500 bucks and the crowd steps in. Help fund the rest. It feels like the options we used to have before Obamacare messed everything up. And of course you'll join the crowd, a group of members just like you who want to help pay for each other's unexpected medical events. The system is betting you'll stay stuck in the same overpriced, overcomplicated mess. And this year it's even more complicated because most of the ACA subsidies expire, which means your prices are going sky high. So far, crowd health members have saved over $40 million in healthcare expenses because they refuse to overpay for healthcare. This open enrollment. Take your power back. Join crowd health to get started today for 99 bucks for your first three months using code [e-mail] that's JoinCrowdHealth.com code TIM. CrowdHealth is not insurance. Opt out. Take your power back. It's how we win. @joincrowdhealth.com but wait, we also have a major announcement. Boonieshq.com the limited edition blueprint collection is now available. You've got the hand grenade. Check this one out. When you when you highlight it. There are five golden serialized limited edition versions of each of these decks. You got the hand grenade. You've got the tim Pool Pro Model 50 caliber anti material rifle. And you can tell it was titled by someone who doesn't actually know what guns are because they wrote material with an A instead of an e. But we forgive you. You've got the assault bottle. Richie Jackson model. That's right. It's a wine bottle that you break and is a weapon. Jason Ellis has the battle axe and Cody Mack has the Colt.45 single action revolver. Very beautiful. Get him while you can. The 50 cals are selling out pretty quickly. Half of them are gone. It looks like maybe more than half. We sold over 100 yesterday. We also have the limited edition step on snack and find out of which. There are 200 of these boards and 10 limited edition serialized golden versions of step on sneck and find out. And that basically means it's randomly distributed. You put it in order, computer sets it up, they slide the board in the box. You might get one of the Limited edition ones. So get them while you can because they sell pretty quickly. We did only three boards last time. They sold out in two hours. Now we have. We have six boards that have launched and we've sold a hefty amount. So check it out. Don't forget, my friends, to also smash that, like, button. Share the show with everyone. You know. We got a couple of great people joining us tonight. Talk about this and everything else. It's the Lectern guy.

[B]

Hey, everybody. What's going on? Happy to be here on January 6th.

[A]

Get up in that microphone, bro.

[B]

Even more.

[A]

You got to get up.

[B]

And now in the microphone. Happy January 6th to all who celebrate. My name is Adam Johnson, Lectern guy, author of the book Taking a Stand, about my journey through the federal prison and the government's abuse. You can buy that on unlicensed furniture reviews dot com. Also, I'm here to announce my candidacy for Manatee county commissioner. I just filed paperwork today. I'm running because the best way to fix things is to start in your backyard.

[A]

Right on. And the Democrats held a vigil, a candlelight vigil for J6, which I guess it's for Ashley Babbitt. I'm not sure what they're holding a candlelight vigil for.

[B]

Vigil for the death of their party.

[C]

They're.

[B]

They're flailing.

[A]

Right on. It's going to be fun. We got Grammys back.

[D]

I am back. Thanks for having me. Wish it was under better circumstances that I'm here. I'm filling in, but happy to be here, as always. Let's do this thing.

[A]

Yeah. Earlier today, a couple members of our crew were in a very serious car accident. And currently one is still in the hospital. And it's. I guess it's serious, but, you know, they're going to. They'll be okay, Mark. Hope everything's all right. But it was. It was a very serious car accident. The story that I'm told, actually, I'm not going to say too much because this could result in. I'm going to stop there. You might get it. But the vehicle they were in, they were riding with Uber and they got t boned by a bus. And I believe it was. We were told by the police, it's the Uber driver's fault. So the car flipped. Very serious injuries. And for this reason, Ian, who had rushed to the hospital to go and check up on everybody because of. I don't want to rag anyone's private, but there were some sick people that were around in the er. Very seriously ill. So we asked, okay, if you were in the hospital, don't come here. Because it was serious illness. Not from our guys, but from the other people that were in their room and around their room. So we asked Graham to fill in because of Ian magnanimously and honorably said he'll. He'll hold back because he doesn't want to get anybody sick after, you know, someone there. I'm not. I'm not going to say what the illness was because it's privacy issues. We don't know who this person was who was sick, but they were very, very sick. So that being said, it sucked, but I believe everyone's going to be okay. So, you know, here's hoping. Kellen was pretty banged up. He was injured, but they did discharge him. And he's going to be taking time off because it was a very serious car accident. They flipped over. I guess the guys after the accident just woke up in the ambulance. Ambulance. Because of how serious the injuries were. Very serious head injuries. But we're hoping everyone recovers and they're okay. So thanks for coming in on short notice.

[D]

Glad to be here. I happen to be in town. Worked out. Yeah.

[A]

And Phil is here as well. Hello, everybody.

[C]

My name is Phil labonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band all that Remains. I'm an anti communist and counter revolutionary. Tate, how you doing?

[E]

I'm doing all right. I'm doing all right.

[D]

Yeah.

[E]

No, Ian. So I'll bring the graphene discussions. I've been reading up. I was grokking it. Really. Have a good understanding.

[A]

Yeah.

[E]

Tate Brown, host Tim Cast, News Live. I'm happy to be here.

[A]

Right on. Let's jump to the story. We got this from CNN. 2000 federal agents are being deployed to Minneapolis in an escalated immigration push. Here's what we know they say in the days since a conservative content creator raised allegations of fraud in a YouTube video with little evidence. I love how they do this. Okay. I love how that is. Because look at what they're saying, right? A conservative, they could call him a journalist. They could. Allegations of a fraud in a YouTube video with little evidence about Somali run daycare centers. Here's the New York Post. Tim Waltz's firebrand daughter Hope admits there is enough truth in Minnesota fraud scandal as she opens up about her dad's decision to drop out of the governor's race. I love that they do these things. CNN just peppers the lies into these stories. And then at the same time, you get the daughter of the Democrat resigning, being like, yeah, it's basically happening. So, major escalation. Here's the weird stuff going on right now. Okay, obviously, we'll talk about this. I'm going online, and I'm seeing a bunch of people on the right attacking Trump. You know, Dan Bongino announced he's coming back. People are attacking Dan Bongino. And I'm just sitting here being like, are we not happy that 2,000 federal agents are being deployed? Like, I'm not gonna sit here and pretend that Trump is perfect, does everything right all the time, nor that he's evil and wrong and doing everything wrong all the time. I'm not gonna sit here and pretend that Dan Bongino walked through the doors of the FBI and instantly just turned into an evil demon. That's ridiculous. There's politics involved, and not everything gets done the way you want to get done. What is happening to where so many people are like, I've just decided Trump's bad now, and I've just said, damn bad. Geno's bad now. It's like, bro, you were allowed to criticize them for screwing up and doing bad things, but we're looking at the story about what's going on in Minneapolis, and they're responding quickly with something good. Are we. Are we gonna act like it's a bad thing? I don't. I don't get it.

[D]

They.

[C]

They get the ice cream, they get the whipped cream, but they don't get the cherry on top. And that's the problem. They're mad. They're just having a. A temper tantrum because they didn't get everything they want. The people that are really upset are the people that believe in their heart that there are, you know, people in the government or in the. In the Epstein files or what have you that actually were pedophiles that are. That were, you know, raping kids. And they. They already believe that. And so what they want is confirmation of what they already believe. Whether or not that's true, I don't know, because. Because, well, I mean, odds are it's true. You know, I don't know, but. But because Dan Bongino was head of the FBI and didn't give them what they want, deputy or deputy head deputy of the FBI. And because he didn't give them what they want, well, he. He must be hiding the information for the FBI. So he's part of the plan. It's not just that he couldn't do it. It's that, oh, he's in on it.

[D]

Well, I've been down the Road from where Dan worked over at the Pentagon. Really across the bridge or whatever. I've said from the very beginning everything with Dan Bongino. Look, I know what Dan gave up because I know what we had to give up to go do a very similar thing at the Pentagon. I've said from the very beginning I trust Dan. Do I necessarily trust every agent that gave Dan everything that he asked for and it was given to him in its entirety how it was originally? No. Just like I saw with Secretary Hegseth. He would ask for things and it would come in half s or not the whole thing or things would be left out. We have let the American people believe that everything is just to Tim's point, instant like that. And I do believe that people thought that Dan Bongino was gonna walk in the FBI building, he was gonna grab people like Comey by the throat and throw them in jail for the rest of their lives with no due process, no files, no nothing. And if you actually look at what Dan did get accomplished, it actually is very impressive. And I believe that even more things are going to happen now that he's out from things that he initiated, got started, policies in place. They reorganized the entire structure of the FBI. I was in his office when he showed it to me. The entire structure. On how the FBI was organized. Dan Bongino and Cash Patel. Eradicated, fired, got rid of, reorganized everything. But normal people don't see that stuff and they don't realize how important that is as they move forward.

[E]

Yeah, the entire intel apparatus for the last 60 years has been targeting right wingers. It's going to take a little bit of time to reorient these sorts of things. Like people. People have this like really grandiose idea of what this is going to look like as a political project. And in their head they're expecting like a revolution and these sorts of things. And it's like we're trying to posture ourselves as the legitimate government, you know, the legitimate party. And we're trying to correctly portray the Democrats as these crazy, insane people because that's what they are. You gotta conduct things in a way that makes sense, that's going to set yourself up for future success. You don't want to just like completely go balls to the walls.

[A]

I'm derail everything and just say that. I think big tech and prominent influencers like Candace Owens are intentionally trying to destroy the right. And so YouTube puts Candace on the front page. That's how she gets massive viewership. Largely it's promotion. And they're Doing it because it's destabilizing to the right Dan Bongino and it feels rather coordinated. We can get super conspiratorial. How do you get rid of Dan Bongino who's getting 100k concurrence on Rumble, bring him to the White House, bring him to the FBI. He goes in, it's an immovable object. He's unable to get things, get these things. Then they immediately send out their propped up influencers to accuse him of being evil when it's more like it's politics. I can criticize Dan all day for I'm disappointed and Donald Trump for things I think did wrong as well. But I'm not stupid. I praise the things they do right. And if not Dan, then who? But I take a look at what's going on right now and you've got. There was one post where I want to stress this like we have a deal, we have a sponsorship with Kalshi major competitor Poly Market. And then you get this viral post where someone posted Tim Pool's part of the 7K poly market network, you know, funded by Israel to go after Candace Owens. And I'm like, we have a sponsorship deal with their competitor. But it's. You go on X and you're seeing all these prominent people on the right just saying the stupidest things in the world. You've got people that are just screaming zejus nonstop. Candace Owens comes out and says we invaded Venezuela for Zionists. And it's like, what? That's just like an incongruent statement. But there are a lot of prominent people that. People who've been on the show. I got a message, I don't know, it might have been you. Someone messaged me saying, tim, why are so many of your former guests backstabbing you? And I'm like, yeah, I don't know, weird stuff going on. And then I'll give a shout out to Matt Strickland, the guy from VA who during COVID the state came and seized all his liquor and shut him down. So we rallied, brought him on the show, we went down to support him. And then what does he do? He goes on X, makes up a fake story about us having no security lies and claims he went to our Virginia city he's never been to so that he can just say Tim Pool's an Israel guy. I'm like, I'm looking at all this going, wow, why would he do that? Well, here's what I think, right? We're talking about and I know we derailed largely from the principal story that we're bringing up. Trump deploying 2,000 feds over the immigration stuff.

[C]

Good.

[A]

Exactly. I'm like, I'm really happy about what's going on, but for some reason I go on X. And all of these, not every single one, but most of these prominent. I shouldn't say most of, but many prominent right wing people have flipped on a dime. Their opinions are inverted. Trump is bad now, everything he's doing is wrong and it's the Jews. And I'm just like, I don't understand how some of these high profile people flipped on a dime. Seriously, it makes no sense. I do understand how the lesser personalities are doing it because they're just grifters and you can really see who it is.

[D]

They need money.

[A]

So my opinion generally right now is that why is it that Candace Owens is propped up on the front page of YouTube and my front page, there's no default front page. But why is YouTube recommending someone breaking their rules to so many people? It destroys the right populist movement in a midterm year, which we're entering, and Trump's gonna get impeached. So then what happens? People like Matt Strickland, a disloyal betrayer who the lowest circle of hell is reserved for, knifes me in the back by lying about us, leaving me shocked. Why he could call me on the phone. Well, people like him, he's a grifter. Yes, he was wronged by the government, we came to his aid, but what he's looking at is how do I get more? And so if all of these people are watching Candace and she's doing so well, I should be like her. And one by one, they, these retards march in lockstep with her crackpot worldview. Dan Bongino is now the bad guy. Trump is now the bad guy. And no, no, it wasn't the Democrats, it was the Jews. Good luck.

[B]

I mean, the influencer things. I mean, it's going to happen. People want to make money, they want to be famous, they want to have clicks and likes. I'm more concerned about the general population that follows along with this. Right. What is their mindset for hearing these things and saying, I believe these things, these things to be true. And I think it's because it's very simple. They are the, they want to blame someone, they want to have a name for it. Right. And the easiest way to do that is say the people who are in charge, those are the names that I'm not going to blame because what happened to kids is terrible. We can all agree on that. And when you have evidence come out that's redacted, when you have, you know, people that they're slowing it down, they want to blame someone because what happened was terrible. But they didn't just walk in. There's not some room where all the information, all the files are sitting there with a nice little pretty bow on it. And they're not being walked through this. That's not real at all. And investigations do take time. This has been a 20 year process. Right. With Jeffrey Epstein, it's been a very long time. And I mean, nothing's gonna come out for it. It's not gonna happen. And I don't think the left would have been, look, I'm not a criminal mastermind. I did take down the entire government, you know, in a course of 20 minutes. But I wouldn't leave things behind that incriminated myself and my friends on the way out the door.

[E]

Yeah, there's no button at the DOJ or DHS or any of these organizations. There's no fix everything button that, like you can just press and immediately solve everything. And then these people who operate in this sort of outrage, that's where all the incentive structures point to is outrage. Click, click, rage baiting, that sort of thing. You can't expect them to understand prudence. Like, that's what the Trump administration is doing here. They're being prudent, they're being careful, they're being calculated, because that's how you maintain power.

[A]

I don't completely agree. I think to a certain degree, yes. I think with like, the Epstein stuff, Trump wants to wield the one ring. Trump gets in and he's like, no, no, the Epstein stuff, I think it largely has to do with the petrodollar. I think we're going to find Saudi princes on the list. I think Trump is like, I'm trying to renegotiate a contract with Saudi Arabia, and if these princes are ousted, that's going to jam up our petrodollar negotiations. Democrats are playing a game of chicken where they're basically like, if we can't have the ball, nobody can. So the reason why all these liberals are coming out being like Epstein and they're screaming about it is because they know Trump's between a rock and a hard place on the petrodollar deal. You've got Democrats who demanded we remove Maduro now claiming Trump's wrong for removing Maduro. It's insane. The question then becomes, why are people on the right all of a sudden on board with this? Well, the Democrats got smart. They tried in 2018 to censor and ban people who opposed the uniparty establishment machine, and it did not work. It backfired. Some people did get banned. That did work. But for the most part, Trump's back. Guess what? Charlie Kirk is dead. If you take a look at all of the machines and mechanisms that helped Trump and the populist movement win and the uniparty establishment got knocked down to an extreme degree, these things are being fundamentally dismantled with Charlie Kirk's assassination, the attacks on Erica Kirk. Listen, you're allowed to not like Erica Kirk, but she's not really that much in the spotlight. I saw this video of a woman insulting her and I just, I thought to myself, like, I don't understand what Erica Kirk has done to warrant this extended campaign of people attacking her. By all means, you can be like, she's unqualified. Who is she to run Turning Point? Okay? I mean, she was just the wife of Charlie. But to do these, like, insults, mockeries, accusing her of knowing about her husband's assassination, I'm just like, it's gross. What did she do? I don't look. I can look at Nancy Pelosi and talk about the insider trading and be like, scumbag. I can look at Chuck Schumer, similar things and be like, Democrat, uniparty, shill, scumbag, Lindsey Graham, all these things. Erica Kirk's barely been in the spotlight. What the is going on where tons of prominent right wing personalities are marching in lockstep with this inverted narrative overnight, Trump wins like flipping on a dime. All these conservatives are now living in this crazy world of conspiracies. The French legions, the Jews. Israel forced us to invade Venezuela. And when you look at what is happening, remove intent from all of it. I just look at the actions. What have we seen so far? Dan Bongino is now a villain. He was the hero. They were celebrating. Cash Patel, the same thing. Everybody campaigning, they're unsatisfied with what they were able to get done. Sure. I look at what Trump did in his first term and I say, yeah, Trump did good, but messed a lot of things up. I voted for him again. I don't expect him to get everything done perfectly. We said it over and over again. Now Dan and Cash are villains now. Marjorie Taylor Greene is out. You've got Matt Gaetz in a. I don't have too much. I don't have anything really to say about Matt Gates critically. But he is moving away and him and Dan are now at odds. You've got the death, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, which has negatively impacted Turning Point, which was a massive force organizing for the right populist movement. And you've got Candace Owens being propped up and effectively driving the normie, mainstream, right and suburban moms into retardation. I'm like, I look at all of this and the. And the one thing I say, the one thing I see that says to me it's intentional, is that Candace has broken every rule on YouTube. I mean it figuratively. She's broken tons of the rules, and YouTube makes sure she's propped up. And I will add this too, because it's not about her. I know people are gonna be like, who cares? Book is. It's not about her. It's about Big Tech and what Big Tech is doing. Earlier today on my following feed on X, I screenshotted this. I shared it internally. I got a post from Candace Owens on my following feed. Not my. For you. I don't go to the for you. It was following people. I follow in reverse chronological recent to see what's coming in the news. I don't follow Candace Owens on X. Why was her post in my feed? Why is she being put up on the front page of YouTube? Why is she breaking the rules and being propped up while saying retarded things that is resulting in people, some of whom we used to watch this show, believing retarded things come the midterms. These people are anti Trump now and they're anti Republican, and it's going to help Democrats win. So my opinion is, and this is a hypothesis, not a theory, Democrats realize censorship doesn't work. What you have to do is controlled opposition. Infect the right with retardation. So what do you have? Trump wins in 2024 with Suburban Housewives. Okay, get rid of them. How do you do it? You need a female coded show to make all the women anti Trump. And that's the move they're making because of RFK Jr. This happened. I look at all this stuff right now and I'm like, it's intentional. It's coordinated. The Democrats are gonna win in the midterms. Trump will be impeached. And then who knows if JD Vance will win because gripers don't want him, neocons don't want him. So what support base will he have left? Maga? No, most of the MAGA people. I shouldn't say most, but MAGA is being split between those who are now critical of Trump and prominent Trump personalities. Meaning if I was gonna make a bet on Call she or polymarket, I wouldn't bet on JD Vance at this point because the right's fractured. Now, to be fair, maybe he still does win the primary, but if the Democrats can muster up a middling marginal figure, maybe Newsom, I don't know. With the fracturing on the right, how do the Republicans even win in 2028? Charlie Kirk was going to be the VP that was the exclusive reporting and they killed him.

[B]

How quickly we forget that they are, they're actually killing us, they're shooting us and we're worried about who's the popular kid on the field. It's actually kind of concerning because we just got back into office, it's only been a year, we've not really recaptured any territory. We're talking about toeing the line at this point, but we've not really captured any territory. And Republicans are very good at losing the midterms when we have a clean sweep, historically speaking. But I think the story we're talking about here, the 2,000 federal agents, this should be larger on MAGA accounts. This is how you win the midterms. This is what we ask for. We ask for these types of reforms. We understand we have a very, very big issue with immigration. Post this stuff, talk about this stuff. You wanna be mad at Trump for not doing things, keep it to yourself for a little bit, we'll get there.

[C]

But this is what's necessary to elevate the levels of deportations to the level that people have been saying for the past year that they want to see. There's so many people that are so black pilled on how many people are not getting deported. There's not enough deportations. If there was 20 million people that came in, they're not doing even close. They're going to get rid of maybe a couple hundred thousand or maybe half a million. That's not close. Blah, blah, blah, blah, which, fair enough, I understand that the numbers don't, you know, the math isn't math and, but at the same time, you need to have funding to get this stuff done. That's what the big beautiful bill had. That was one of the reasons that Trump was saying this has to pass because we need this kind of injection of cash to be able to do the deportations that we need to, we need do expand ice. Now that it's here, people are, you know, not really even paying attention.

[A]

Well, I want to, I want to address this comment on, on Rumble where they said she should have been your following because Someone you follow commented on her post. How do you not know this? Wrong. Of course I know this. I buy ads. I operate on all these social media platforms. I own a multimillion dollar company with 40 plus staffers operating on all these social media platforms. Okay, this was weird. A post from her showed up on my feed in my following recent on X. No comments, no retweets. I don't follow her. Why? Honest.

[D]

Qu.

[A]

Was it a glitch? A glitch put Candace Owens in my personal feed. I called her a very disparaging term on this show. I don't follow her on X. There was no comment made on her post. I have the screenshot. Maybe I should just tweet it out and say like, this is really weird. Why is X pushing her into my feed? There was no comment. I fully understand. If someone I follow comments another person's post, you will see their post and their comment. This is not that case. I genuinely believe that Big Tech is propping up Candace Owens because she says retarded shit and she's tricking conservatives into being retarded. And there are a bunch of people who used to, who have been on the show several times that I've considered friends who now don't wanna come on the show. And they're tweeting about the Jews nonstop. They sound like they're fucking retarded. By all means criticize Israel. By all means criticize there's prominent Jews in media with agendas. But y' all sound like retards. And if you go to a suburban housewife and you say ze Jews, they're gonna be like, I'm just trying to buy diapers.

[E]

Yeah.

[A]

So why are they gonna vote for Republicans?

[E]

Yeah, well, I mean, you have this issue. This has been the big issue with the conservative movement is, you know, Trump won. You know, there was some misfires, these sorts of things. Then the Biden winner, you basically expand your camp because people love to have the feeling that they have knowledge that no one else has. And that's what gave the right the edge for the longest time, is that we were kind of sexy, we were kind of outsiders. We were always like, once we get in power, we're going to get these things done. Trump too, we're like, empower. All of our guys are in here. Things are looking up. Well, these people that like that feeling of having hidden knowledge, they're natural contrarians. And so you've invited all these people into our ranks, these sort of natural contrarians. Now that we're seeing stuff like this Everything is trending in the right direction. Everything from this admin, you know, everything. But most things from this admin and have been directionally correct. It's not enough for these people because they're natural contrarians. They're always skeptical of every single thing. And partially that's valid, I mean, considering what we've all gone through over the last 60 years. But at a certain point you need to sit back and focus, like, hey guys, like, like you're saying Charlie Kirk's dead. Like, this isn't a game anymore. This isn't like, oh, we can have these sexy edgy views. It's like, this is life and death. This is, we're talking about the country you're going to leave to your children and grandchildren.

[B]

That's it.

[E]

Let's tighten ranks a little bit here.

[B]

Generationally mindset, that's how we have to be.

[D]

I think, Tim, I agree with you 100, I agree with you 100% here. Here's the bigger thing. You've got all these black pilled people that talk about people like us, oh, it's the Jews and they're bought for and all this and kind of stuff. In my opinion, that's the new litmus test of who the real grifters and who the real traders are. And what I mean by that is everyone that does this for a living, you know, certain things. We had this very conversation. I would be shocked if you guys didn't have it on the show here election night. We all looked at each other and said, you know, if Trump wins, we're probably going to lose 25, 30% of revenue next year. Because in good times, advertisers don't buy. I mean, that's just kind of how things work, right? This is a business after all. The same people, the same people that are now attacking Trump and all of this, how do you make up for that revenue? How do you make up for that? You go after the thing that causes division that people are paying for. I've said this a million times. It's not just Candace Owens. I warn everyone that listens to talking heads. We know for a fact in Congress, we know for a fact that YouTube and everything absolutely admitted that they were censoring, shadow banning, deplatforming people. But yet you have all of these conservatives that blew up during the Biden administration and are blowing up and being featured now that are breaking every rule and all of this. And back when they were on the conservative train and pro Trump, they still somehow were making it. All of them are now on my watch list. Every single one of them. I don't trust a thing that any of them say, because how. How do you grow in that time? If you're actually speaking the things that.

[A]

They claim were bad, I'm not interested in, like, you know, with, like, Tim Dillon and Theo Vaughan being on the cutter train. I am not claiming they're paid by Qatar. I'm saying, why are these comedian guys coming out and getting on the Israel stuff? Yeah, I just. And Qatar. And the weirdest thing in the world to me is when I go out into the regular touch grass world and talk to people. None of this exists. None. None of this exists.

[D]

There's people that don't know about Venezuela still.

[A]

I was talking to a guy on Sunday and who was like, what happened?

[D]

Yeah.

[E]

Wow.

[A]

And then you go online, and these prominent personalities are starting to align around weird things that are not in the zeitgeist Israel. Cutter is not in the. Okay, you go outside. I'm driving in Loudoun county, right? So. So our studio, which we're not going back to following the shooting. I think this is clear to everybody. There were people who were like, tim's full of it. He'll be back. Watch. And like, no, we're. We're not. We were shot at.

[E]

We.

[A]

We lit. We were in West Virginia, and so we were about 30 seconds away from Loudoun County. Loudoun county is where at the school that. That father's daughter, that young girl, was raped. And the father went in and screamed. They dragged him out. When you drive into Loudon, there are parents outside holding up signs, protesting. We went to. It's the Catoctin Skate Park. Look it up. And this was around that time, and we could see tables set up and parents were pamphletting. That's real world stuff. Masks. During COVID we would go places and see the mask signs. Real world stuff. Literally nowhere anywhere do I go outside and see people going, israel, Qatar, Israel is. The Jews doesn't exist. And so I'm sitting here being like, why are they talking about this? Why are podcasts focusing on this? Why are prominent conservative personalities accusing Trump of being a Zionist? What the is going on?

[E]

Yeah, well, also. Yeah, well. And, like, Trump has these, like, supposed crises where the entire. Well, this sort of apparatus that we're describing, like, comes out, and they're like, this is the end of Trump. Trump's betrayed us. D d and you look at the polling, and nothing changes. Nothing budges. Because the average American is just, like, not paying attention to these weird, like, esoteric stories they're concerned about, prices of things they are concerned about, like is the illegal immigration topic being tackled, Stuff that they can feel and see in their everyday life. And then you see these people come out. This is the end of maga. Check the polling the next day. Didn't move.

[B]

I think it's taboo. It's salacious. It definitely gets clicks and likes and it's kind of the one conversation we haven't had. Israel, I think it's fascinating to listen to, but I don't really take much of it to heart. Right. And I don't think these people really believe in it either. I think a lot of it is just, this is the thing that's keeping my family fed and keeping my car payment made. You know, I think it's reductive to MAGA as well. We're not. When we say, I don't want to send money to Israel, that's reductive. What I mean, what I mean to say is I don't want to send money anyway. Anywhere, anywhere. And when we just focus on one country and say, oh, they must be anti Israel, no, I think we should keep all of our money. People can't afford their groceries. People can't afford their rent. People have credit card debt. No one has any money in savings. So when I say things like that, that's what I mean. And I think that's what MAGA means.

[A]

I think the reality is that everything is fake and gay. That's true. I think that what the Algorithm is on YouTube and X and all these places literally accept rumble are intentionally allowed. I said this about our show years ago. People were like, tim, why is your show doing so well? It's a pressure release valve. The machine state allows us to operate on YouTube because at least for the time, for the time being, they did. Because we were, you know, I described it like there's an island and the cliffsides are eroding. They wipe out most conservatives and keep the moderates to be the right. So that's why they allow us to exist. Because if you come out and just ban literally anybody aligned with this worldview, then you cause a shockwave. You get riots, you get protest. And that's literally what happened. And they realized it wasn't working, so they're shifting their method now and saying, no, no, we need to be the right. We need to control them. I think it's all fake. I think they're intentionally propping up certain posts. I think retweets, likes, comments, they're mostly botted and Faked. There was a viral clip where this woman on Twitch accidentally revealed that she understood how botting worked. Basically, it was like they were doing a live stream. And then someone mentioned botting shows. Well, you know, it would cost you, like, 50k to do this. And the guy turns and goes, how do you know how much it costs to bot?

[D]

Yeah.

[A]

And then she like, I just. I know people. It's like, right. Whether it's private or intentional, think about how a government can control its people, especially following the Trump movement. It's possible. I'm not saying I know for sure, but here's a hypothesis. With the rise of the Internet, they didn't expect a movement to emerge that would elect someone like Donald Trump. They thought Trump would lose. Hillary Clinton was very unlikable. And with meme magic, they call it, a movement was built that actually got Trump a little bit more votes than the machines they'd expected. Trump wins. What do they do? Accuse him of being a Russian spy, Impeach him, Accuse him of crimes. Eventually, Joe Biden. We have questions about the 2020 election. And it's funny because I have these people tweeting at me being like, nigel Bullet, the election fraud. No. Pennsylvania changed their election rules in violation of their state constitution. Every stop was pulled out to make sure Trump would lose. Well, guess what? What happened? Thanks to the intrepid work of Turning Point usa, and I genuinely mean of Turning Point usa, Charlie Kirk got young people to vote conservative. Now look at what's going on. They killed him. And by they, I mean interested parties who opposed what Charlie did. Whoever you think it was, he's gone. It seems now that the realization was we have to. We are going to actually control the narratives. What's allowed, our show is allowed as a pressure release valve. They ban Alex Jones, they ban Nick Fuentes, and all these people. Now they're basically like, let's be these people. The algorithm promotes people who are clearly breaking the rules, as we already described. And you're wondering why it is. And the lesser personalities march in lockstep because they see someone getting 3,000 retweets posting Zejus. But I'm going to say it again. When I go outside and I see parents protesting that a boy was in the girl's bathroom and raped her. I see people in Loudoun county protesting. I go to a poker table, which is usually the basis of my conversations. If you watch the show or I go to a venue or a restaurant or meet someone in person, there are real tangible things they're talking about. Even Venezuela is not one of them. Foreign policy stuff is beyond people, but Israel is certainly not there. But for these people online, it's very clear to me, maybe I'm wrong, but it's very clear to see people following a political narrative that is not attached to the regular working class person. It seems intentional so that the issues in this midterm election are detached from the working class person. Prominent conservative personalities, libertarians, conservative or otherwise, who used to go on shows like this and say, we need cheaper gas, we need to secure our borders, we gotta stop the fraud, are now going, the Jews. And if you go to a regular working class person and say, would you help me fight the Jews? They're gonna say, huh? And if you go to them and say, would you help me secure the border, deal with this illegal immigration so we can stop the murder and the crime, they go, yeah, I heard about that. There are people who talk to me every day about, or a routine conversation I hear is about illegal immigration in Chicago, how they're giving away property in community centers to illegal immigrants, how they're giving hotels to illegal immigrants in New York City. These things affect regular people. Gen Z people being like, I can't afford a home and I'm watching them put up these hotels for illegal immigrants. Now what are people talking about on social media? No, no, the Venezuela thing was the Jews again. And I'm like, okay, good luck winning a midterm election. That being said, I do think we've talked about that quite a bit, so we should jump to this next story. We've got this from the White House. Indeed. President Donald J. Trump announces interim authorities in Venezuela will be turning over between 30 and 50 million barrels of high quality sanctioned oil to the good old US Of A. Trump truth. I am pleased to announce the interim authorities in Venezuela will be turning over between 30 and 50 million barrels of high quality sanctioned oils to the U.S. the oil will be sold at its market price and that money will be controlled by me as President of the United States of America to ensure it is used to benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States. I've asked Energy Secretary Chris Wright to execute this plan immediately. It will be taken by storage ships and brought directly to unloading docks in the United States. Thank you for your attention to this matter. So just a moment ago, we were talking about the weird trends and the shift in the narrative. Let me put it like this, let me ask this. Why are there people who are effectively, effectively, I don't mean literally, but effectively on the side of Chinese Expansion, Honest question. Venezuela in the 2000s seized American oil assets, stole it from us, billions of dollars. And we did nothing. We sanction them, we say that's bs. Now you've got a combination of factors including the narco terrorism stuff, narco gangs, crime, expansion. But more importantly, Iran and China operating through Venezuela and Venezuela selling oil that we've sanctioned to Iran. And China has to import a lot of this oil. Why would we just allow them to do this? They have aggressed upon us a long time ago. There's already conflict and they're aiding and abetting China. I'm not suggesting it's good that we went in and snatched Maduro, but I am saying this does benefit the United States more than say Afghanistan or Iraq. But there are people once again on the right who are blindly just in the America shouldn't do these things. It feels more like people are marching behind fake narratives as opposed to actually having a nuanced argument about this. So again with the previous conversation that it seems like people have flipped on a dime. I see the exact same thing here. There is a nuanced conversation about Venezuela. The issues that took place with the regime change wars we launched by invading Iraq and Afghanistan are palpable. And we can discuss all of the problems that have emerged. We're still dealing with Afghanistan. The removal of the president of Venezuela is an entirely different story. And we don't want it to become a regime change war. And I don't want boots on the ground. But there is nuance. It's completely different. There are people who are just tweeting things where they're like, it's one or zero. That's it. The United States should do nothing. They should let Venezuela sell oil that they stole our assets over to produce and give to China.

[B]

Well, they're talking out of both sides of the mouth then. Because you can't on one hand say we want someone to do something and then get mad when someone do something. And we didn't start a war. We took one guy, we took one person. And it was kind of badass how we did it too, wasn't it?

[D]

Perfect operation, by the way. Do you know what perfect?

[B]

Do you know what gave me hope about this administration? Not a single leak about that operation. Not a single leak came out. No one knew that was happening. It just happened. And it gave me faith and hope that maybe, just maybe there are things happening behind the scenes and we don't hear about them because there are no leaks. We actually do have a secure White House and we Have a secure staff that's not going to let things go.

[D]

Yeah.

[B]

It gives me hope that maybe one day things will come out that make me very, very happy.

[E]

And you know what helps is ejecting all of the adversarial media from the Pentagon. I mean, hello, like, everyone was like, why did that happen? It's like, because this would have been on the front page everywhere if that happened. Because these people are sourcing stories. Also, it's hilarious seeing like, Brian Krastine in there who's like, always chirping about Ukraine. It's like, dude, people with zero, like geopolitical consciousness are like, jumping on this story. Do you know how you defeat Russia? You flood the market with cheap oil and you force them to bring their oil price down. That will destroy their economy. This is the worst thing to happen to Russia than any victory Ukraine has inflicted on them in the battlefield. This is how you conduct the geopolitical affairs, is how you bend the arm of our political adversaries. This is how you. This is. This is Geopolitics 101. And these people, their entire political dichotomy is just Trump or no Trump. Like, that's all it really comes down to.

[A]

Yeah, but my point is that on the right, it's happening now too.

[E]

Well, on the right, again, that goes back to the natural contrarians where they're just dissatisfied with anybody. That's our guys in power.

[A]

I agree. I think based on the trends that we're seeing, the response to Trump from the right even is that we are going back to uniparty politics. I imagine by this time, you know, four years from now, we are going to be. It's going to be Hillary Clinton versus Mitt Romney, esque. You're going to get 20. Look, it was supposed to be Charlie Kirk and J.D.

[D]

Vance.

[A]

That's the reporting that Kirk was going to be the VP for JD in 28. I don't know what's going to happen in 28. It may maybe JD Vance, but the way the rights fighting, especially still lingering into a midterm year, uh, I'm not sure that they're going to be able to muster up a coalition to win. It's going to be. Sounds like 2032 is the plan to return to Hillary Clinton versus John McCain.

[E]

It just seems to me the issue is the, the Democrat Party because the parties are reacting to each other. And we were talking yesterday about Mamdani and I was evaluating Mamdani's viability as like this truly transformational mayor in New York. City, even though the transformation would be grim. But I made the point. I was like, I think fundamentally he's going to be rage baiting the right for four years because all he's really trying to do is legitimize his ideas in the Democrat Party. How do you do that? Well, you become the boogeyman for the right. So that way people on the left say, wow, this Mamdani guy seems to draw the ire of Republicans more than anybody else. And the way that people conduct politics now, because it's a outrage economy, is they just seek for how do I inflame the other side as much as possible on the right. It's kind of based when we do it. But you know, that something we said about that. So it's really tough to see a situation in which either party sort of moderates, like their base, actually moderates their taste. I just don't see the appetite for that in either party.

[B]

Well, you vote for the guy the other side hates the most, right?

[D]

Yep.

[B]

So this, this Manami in New York, everyone voted for him because every conservative said, oh my gosh, he's a communist. Even the President's talking about it. And they like, they showed out numbers for it. They did. But I mean, New York's a petri dish. It's, it's, as far as I'm concerned, it's a lost cause. You know, I don't think they're going to recover from that. I mean even the conservative guy who was running, how conservative was he? He was talking about seizing real estate and then redistributing it for low income housing.

[E]

Yeah, well, it's even, I mean, I mean obviously that's a different story at play here. But like even Mamdani, like, there's not that much America can actually do in New York City. It's a city council driven like government. So what's really going to be the most consequential result of Mamdani's sort of reign, so to speak, is just like vape shop, more vape shops opening and just like the decline continuing. Like, I don't think he's going to actually like establish this like Maoist state in New York. What he's doing is actually worse because it's one thing if it's like concentrated to New York City, New York City falls apart and everyone in this like country goes, wow, we can't do that. We can't repeat that. What's happening is far worse. He's going to be ineffective as mayor and he's going to Legitimize his ideas in the Democrat Party. And now the entire Democrat party is going to be Mamdani style politics. That's far worse. It'd be much better if it was just contained in New York City. That would be optimal. But that's just not what's going to happen. He's just going to continue to rage bait. He's going to continue to say these really inflammatory things. We as commentators have no choice but to jump on because it's, you got to correct the record and it's just going, it's just going to legitimize his philosophy.

[B]

I think so. I mean there's a lot of them in office now too. I mean you've got aoc, you've got a handful of people that have just come out and said yes, communism is good.

[C]

Yeah. I mean the, and that's the thing. It's it at the end of the day, even if they don't say it's communism, they're repeating lines that Marx used.

[E]

The.

[C]

All the policies or all the policies that have destroyed socialist countries around the world. Doesn't matter what society it was before the socialists got in power. It's the same result. The, the capital fly, you know, leaves because nothing is, is, is holding it there. People money leave and then the tax base dries up. They start taxing the middle class or, or expropriating the property of the middle class, which is what they're hoping to do in the United States. It's, it's just a bad, bad thing that the, the Democrats have allowed for this kind of ideology to infest them. It used to be where you had Democrats that were, you know, fairly conservative or would agree with Republicans. That is those days are over. That is gone. And now you're going to see more and more politicians that are like the, that are basically the far left. I personally think that's, that's somewhat due to the fact that the left is more internationally informed now because of the Internet. Right. Like Democrats in the U.S. it used to be Democrats would get their ideas from other democr and stuff. Nowadays you get people on the Internet that are getting basically fed socialist slop from other countries and stuff.

[E]

Yeah, absolutely. I mean this is the thing about like social media that causes problems. I was talking about on the show today is yeah, we are developing sort of this international consciousness was really only occurring on the left and this is why antifa is increasingly effective. Like in Berlin they had an attack. Maybe it was like last night our time where they effectively took out the Entire power grid in Berlin. It was an antifa cell. And the issue is like, you can't contain these things anymore. Like, that's not just something that happens in Germany, that's happening globally. That's why when we classified antifa as an fto, that wasn't just like a sleight of hand trick so we could go after them. It was like, no, they genuinely are collaborating over like over borders. And that's what's so terrifying. And then this, this point with like Mamdani, it's a really good point that needs to be made is we have this tendency in America to just want to go back to like the 90s. Like we're like, oh, then that's when things are perfect, the 90s radies. But the thing that you have to do, if you're really trying to restore America, if you're trying to make America great again, you have to ratchet all the way back because you can't ratchet liberalism back to an earlier stage and then just freeze it there and hope it doesn't develop into this. Every like 10 times out of 10, it's going to result in Mamdani. Because that's how political philosophy works. You have to keep moving the football down the field in order if you have like a, you know, sort of vision for what you want the country to be. And it's just going to naturally turn into this every single time. Like, you can't just freeze a political ideology in place. It's always going to continue to develop along the way.

[B]

You'll never reach equilibrium. It's always a pendulum.

[E]

Exactly.

[C]

Yeah, well, I don't see the policies that the Democrats are pushing being popular with the older people in the United States. But I do see a lot of energy in the young people.

[E]

Yeah, well. Yeah, well. And it's exactly as. I mean, because they've been seeking to overhaul the demographic of the United States. And there's no question about that, that's Biden was pretty open about that. And so it's just going to get worse as the older population dies off because again, the younger you get, the less American it gets. Like it's more and more people who are foreign born or that, you know, like their children are foreign born. And typically children of foreign born politics reflect their parents. So it's like the Democrats have set this play up. They set this up 60 years ago, like with the Hart Celler Act. Like this has been in development for a very long time, is to make Republicans just politically unviable as an institution. And so that's what, like, that's kind of the problem. I don't think people realize, like there was an hourglass that was turned over. And in many ways we kind of ran out of time already. Trump's sort of brought denaturalization to the table. It's like, okay, we might actually be able to undo some of this damage, but it's like, dude, this has been a masterful play by the Democrats. They're not idiots. Some of them are. Some of their actual politicians are idiots. But a lot of these guys are careful, they're prudent. They know what they want and in many ways they want it more than we do.

[B]

Well, this is what I'm saying. We have to be generationally mindset. If we can admit and say and believe that it's taken 60 years for them to get here. They've been in charge a very long time. We're not going to win this with one presidency or at minimum, one year. It's going to take a very long time to win this game. It's why raising kids, having kids is the most important thing we can do. Phil's doing a great job working on it. He's not in the game too.

[A]

Let's, let's jump to the story. Ladies and gentlemen, it is a holiday. It's January 6th and the Democrats are holding a candlelight vigil. I kid you not. I don't understand it. This is, this is not a joke. Democratic lawmakers on the fifth anniversary of January 6th attack on US Capitol. Why are they holding candles? Ashley Babbitt. But you know, that's not really why we went out the Senate door, made a right turn, opened another door, and we were within 20ft of those rioters, of those insurrectionists. One of them looked at me and said, there he is. Get him. Of my brave police officers led by Mike Luzinski. I wasn't hurt.

[B]

That was actually me. I was asking for grilling tips.

[A]

Let us never mince words about what happened again. Those who try to lie about it, those who try to make up myths about it. I'm just not interested in listening to whatever it is talking about.

[B]

Let's talk about a myth that's still perpetuated. I had to correct people in real time who are very high level influencers, conservative influencers. I didn't steal the lectern. I'm still having that five years from now. I just got my first couple community note this year. People still believe I actually took that thing home.

[A]

The community note saying, you didn't.

[B]

Yes, you can ask Rock Now. Rock now says I moved it. Rock said I moved it.

[A]

Didn't take it right up and moved and put it down.

[C]

Yeah, relocation.

[B]

Yep. Just unlicensed furniture moving via Getty's Relocation Service.

[A]

You know, guys.

[D]

Exactly.

[A]

This, this video of Chuck Schumer. I walked out the door and he said, there he is, get him. I'm just, I'm just, I'm so over it. I'm just, I'm completely over it. I don't care about any of this. It is a bunch of fake people saying fake shit nonstop all the time. I, you know, I've been over the holiday break. Uh, I talked to a lot of people who have expressing that it's just the same story every day, that nothing's changing. I'm not gonna be wrong. Trump has done some stuff, but it feels like it's just, you know, again, with all due respect to Dan Bongino, it's disappointing. If not Dan, then who? We thought he was gonna go in and then he comes out and he's like, yeah, nothing. We can't do anything. Nothing to see here. Like Epstein killed himself. So everybody's just continually disappointed. Nothing ever happens. Right. Don't get me wrong, like a lot of happenings have happened in the past couple of months. And over the past year there's been a lot happening. But in the political space, the day to day, it is mind numbing to listen to the Democrats. A candlelight vigil. It's been five years. We know you're lying. Why are we bothering with this? I don't get it. Why are these people still in office? What is happening?

[E]

Yeah, I mean, to some degree, like it's kind of a good thing if politics gets boring. Like C Span should be boring to watch. Like that's historically how politics operated for wonks. They had like a slur. We called them wonks because it's like you guys are nerds. And you know, if things go well with the Trump administration, I mean, if this trajectory continues and then, and to potentially advance presidency, hopefully politics is back to just being like a snooze fest and people can go back to their lives. I mean, that's been the biggest. That's been the big issue. That's been the big issue with why we're seeing like so much slop in the political zeitgeist is because it's not boring. And it's like again, we were talking about earlier, it's like, no, we're talking about life and death. We're talking about the country we're gonna leave to our kids, these sorts of things. Like, we should take this a little bit more seriously, people. But people love the sensational. They love that. So it's like maybe like returning the boring. I know it's bad for us, bad for business, but like there's something to that.

[D]

But the only thing about that though is it was, it's a double edged sword. Right. And it really kind of goes to your point earlier. It's always going to be a football kick down further and further and further. If we go back to that, it's going to lead to what has got us in the situation that we're in in the first place. Oh, you just vote Republican down the ticket, you have no idea. Or Democrat down the ticket, you have no idea what's going on. You couldn't even name your congressman or woman, you have no idea what's happening. And then that leads to the decades of decades of decades of decades of corruption that we're now trying to fight against. So what I said, we did a very bad job as talking heads, influencers, creators, whatever you want to call us. We did a really bad job, myself included, of the American people understanding that one election is not going to make America utopia. It's not gonna happen. You're talking about at least 50 years of just horrible, horrific corruption all day, every day. But with everyone being interested in what's going on and everybody getting to the bottom of what's happening, eventually you're gonna get to this point where nobody can do it well enough. And then the question goes, well, what happens then? What happens with all of the people, all of America, or enough of them at least, that are like, no one's going to do what we need to do. Does that lead to government overthrow? Where does that lead? And so the truth is we really, what we're all debating right now and where the American people found themselves and why you feel this thing going on that you don't really know what you're feeling is we're in the middle of both of those spectrums right this second.

[E]

Right. Well, but either side of those spectrums, either way you're going to get gridlocked because it's like a, everyone's asleep at.

[D]

The wheel, has to give. Yeah, something has to give at some point.

[E]

And that's, that's why the Trump, like the Trump, the MAGA movement has been really like a veil lift in many ways. Because like you had the 90s, like Francis Fukuyama coming out and saying like, we've reached the end of history. Like social democracy, social liberalism is the final stage of government. Like, we're not going to progress past this. This is the natural conclusion of political philosophy. We're at the last man. These sorts of things. And I think everyone kind of subliminally thought that. I think everyone, like, across the west was like, yeah, that's probably correct. And then Brexit happens, and then Trump happens. Everyone sits back and goes, oh, no, no, no. History is still unfolding. And then it's been dramatic. I mean, these last eight years have been, like, dramatic. I mean, our grandchildren are going to read about this in the history books. But it's gotten to the point now where everyone has takes. Everyone has a political philosophy, everyone has different varying goals. And now that the big tent, because we're not in an election cycle, is kind of unraveling a little bit, we're going to see now again gridlock. We have gridlock again.

[A]

Well, I somewhat agree with you, but we said grandchildren. You mean more like AI robot facsimile grandchildren.

[E]

That's what I'm going for. Yeah.

[A]

Where no one's having kids. And actually, you know, it does seem like people are having kids like crazy right now.

[D]

Yeah.

[A]

At least in our sphere. And maybe because we are addressing it and saying, like, the daycares are full.

[B]

The daycares are full.

[E]

Have you seen the. Have you seen the demographic projections in Pennsylvania where by the end of the century, Muslim. No, no, no. By the end of the century, 20% of Pennsylvania. No. But, yeah, 20, 20, 100. 20% of Pennsylvania be Amish. So, like, really? Yeah. You're going to have the situation again. Brooklyn by, like, 20 butter. There's, like, a lot of projections by 2070, at this trajectory, things could change. Brooklyn will be as. Because the Hasidics have such a high birth rate. So we're going into a world where it's like a lot of people are going to self filter out of the gene pool and these uber religious communities are going to, like, dominate.

[C]

That's why the Democrats want the immigration so much.

[E]

That's part of it. Yeah. But even the immigrants, like, look, across the world, birth rates are falling even in the Third World. And A, that's blowing up all of our economic models. But B, you're gonna have the situation where in Pennsylvania, like, you're gonna play ball with the Amish. We kind of saw that in the last election. I mean, the Amish did put their thumb on the scales and in many ways led to Trump's victory.

[B]

Thank you, Scott. Pressler.

[E]

Yes. And that's going to continue. Like, there's the timeline that we're entering. Makes Fukuyama look like the biggest idiot on planet Earth because it's like there's so many moving parts now. No disrespect to Fukuyama, but there's so many moving parts now that it's like, you have to start considering these, like, really sensational things because they're real. They're here.

[A]

Remember, what was that story about, like, the guy at the patent office in the 1890s said, Everything that can be invented has been invented? Do you remember that? What was that all about?

[C]

I don't know who said that, but that's obvious. I mean.

[D]

Yeah. What a swing and a miss.

[E]

Oh, where they call World War I the Great War. It's the war and all wars.

[C]

Yeah, that's. That's something that happens, you know, in history regularly. People think, oh, well, this is it. We're at the apex of. Of human civilization. We're at the apex of whatever topics, whatever expert thinks that they have expertise on. And then, you know, something happens and there's a massive change.

[A]

You know, it is apocryphal. This is Charles Holland Duel, and they said that he's widely known for a statement that he purportedly made during his time as U.S. state commissioner, U.S. commissioner of patents. Everything that can be invented has been invented. However, it's been debunked as apocryphal by librarian Samuel Sasse, who traced the quote back to a 1981 book called the Book of Book of Facts and Fallacies. Okay, well, okay, we'll crack the record for this guy. Yeah, he never said that stupid thing.

[B]

So for my kids invent new ways to break things all the time. I'm shocked. Yeah, they do invent new ways to break things all the time.

[A]

They just stare at the jar and it levitates and then shatters.

[B]

I'm on my third toilet seat upstairs.

[E]

In their bathroom, and I have no.

[B]

Idea what is going on. And they have a pretty clean diet, so I'm not sure what's. What accounts for it.

[E]

But to be fair to like, to Steel, man, the idea that this was like the end of politics is if you look at the post war consensus, that was pretty rigid. Like, it did feel like that's not going anywhere. It did in many ways feel like, what are we gonna do? We're gonna have Mitt Romney versus Obama for the rest of our lives and Trump the brick through the window is legitimately the most consequential. That ride down the escalator is the most consequential moment and probably in our lifetimes. It's going to be in our lifetime.

[A]

You know, I will say this. Like, I think we had this political decade. If you go back to, like, and it's caused by the economic collapse, which shocked a lot of people. They began asking why it was they couldn't afford to live anymore. Millennials started asking why they couldn't afford to live, have families, buy houses. Gen Z's in a similar spot. But I think Gen. Gen Z is very nihilistic. So whereas millennials became activists, Gen Z is like, y' all are stupid. Who cares? And they're largely just like, detaching.

[C]

Yeah.

[A]

And, man, you look at the current trends among Gen Z and what people are starting to focus sports betting.

[D]

Yeah.

[A]

I think Gen Z is basically just like, we literally don't care anymore. So, you know, my point is, like, I remember when I first started making content during Occupy Wall street, there was this bubbling up of politics in the mainstream. People were interested in it. But I remember when I was younger, nobody cared. Sure, there was protests and stuff, but this was not the popular thing that everyone was focused on. I think we were probably in the back end of this, of this, this political swing. And I'm wondering if in the next few years, politics becomes esoteric, just, I don't know, droll garbage that most people don't care about, and political channels become substantially smaller with less money.

[E]

Yeah. I think zoomers, like 90% of zoomers, ballpark, are either nihilist or political extremists. Like, that's just the reality situation. And I mean, that's just anecdotes. But I think this is reflected in polling.

[A]

I think with the George Floyd riots, a lot of us expected, man, people are gonna lose their minds. And like you said, some of these Gen Z, they're split between extremists and nihilists. But I think for a lot of people, they're going to be like, yeah, I don't care if you grew up at a time where you saw all of these crises and all these political conflicts and Trump and impeachment and Brisma and all these things, and then nothing happened. And you've got these Gen Z people saying nothing ever happens. Yeah. Why are they going to turn the TV on and pay attention? Why are they going to turn on a podcast to pay attention? They're going to go sports bet.

[C]

Well, yeah, the only time they're going to turn on the TV and pay Attention is when they see things like the inflation that we've seen, like it turns into.

[A]

I don't think so.

[C]

Well, it turns into kitchen table issues. Like, because every.

[A]

They don't own a kitchen table.

[C]

Well, they might. They can't pay for their client, they can't make their Klarna payments, and they're going to be like, oh, you know, couldn't.

[A]

From the get goes. My point for millennials, we like, I'm in my 20s and everything starts going bad, but I was already in a bad spot as it was. Gen X largely felt this much more than everyone else. Boomers survived much better, but for Gen Z, that was born into a world of nothing.

[B]

Yeah, they can't feel loss they've never experienced.

[A]

Exactly.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So they grow up hearing about all these problems in politics and they're like, maybe there's a way to deal with this. I hear what you're saying, but finally they're like 25 and they're going, bro, you've been saying the same thing for 15 years. Okay, I'm going to go bet on the Steelers game.

[B]

Yeah, you want to change and break the cycle. Arrest anyone on that screen. Anyone, Anyone. Show me that it's real. Show me that the reason I vote up is because this is real. Show me the reason I went to prison is because it was right. Show me that America is still worth saving. Arrest any one of them. Yeah, I understand.

[A]

I mean, it's cash too. But Dan's leaving now and they're making fun of him. I think the reality is you can't stop the machine. I said this of Obama. I said this of every president. I've been saying it for decades. You get elected, you say, when I get office, I'm gonna do this thing. You get in and then you can't for a million and one reasons. And it's not always that there's an evil deep state cabal that's like, we'll kill you if you do. It's like you get an office and you say, okay guys, I want to deal with this border crisis. And they go, well, here's the thing. If we don't have the illegal immigrants, look at all these areas of the country where population decline is setting in and we don't have low skill labor to replace the young people who are aging out. That's the Democrat worldview. Trump, the reason they hate him is cuz he goes, huh, I don't care. Shut the border down. And they're like, but don't you understand? You're Knocking pegs out from the machine. He's like, I don't care. We can't keep doing the same thing. And that's why people liked what Trump was doing. But basically, what I'm saying, as it pertains to Dan Bongino, my assumption would be he goes in and says, I want to do something here. You know what I genuinely think happened? The reason the Epstein list doesn't come out is because Saudis are on it and Trump's. Trump said, guys, don't screw up the petrodollar negotiations. I think Epstein files come out. We're going to lose this deal. China's going to win.

[B]

I think it all comes down to money. It all comes down to money. I mean, if we assume the. Okay, let's. We can play, list some names on the list, right? And let's say it's a couple of, you know, big CEOs of publicly traded companies. You start arresting, handful those people, you will crash markets. Yeah, they employ hundreds of thousands of people. I think everything comes down to that. The reason they can't share is because it would destabilize our entire economy.

[A]

And so you're told. And it's hypothetical. I don't know for sure. But Dan Bongino, a guy like him, he gets in and he goes, we got to put this list out. And they go, see these three guys on the list. If they get arrested, we're gonna lose an oil contract, we're gonna lose an oil pipeline, and we're gonna see a 17% collapse of the US stock market because this person holds X amount of, you know, equities with BlackRock and this. And then it's like, crap. And so for a lot of people, they've said to us, I don't care what the ramifications are. I don't care if the US Economy tanks because of it. I don't care if it starts a war. Do it. And I'm not saying that's wrong. I get it. Don't protect these people and let them get away with it. But what happens when Donald Trump personally says to you, I will not be the president that watches the union collapse? Please don't do this again, not saying this is actually what happened, but I'm saying it's a hypothetical of how the machine works. What do you do when you say to everybody, I'm gonna expose the Epstein list? You get in, and then the president, who you know and trust, says, here's what will happen if you do. And then he hands you the button and says, you're allowed to press it if you want. Just know, here's all the collateral damage the US Will face because of it. Do you press the button? I know a lot of people would say yes. A lot of people would say no. I'm not saying what you should or shouldn't do. I'm pointing out these are the scenarios faced by people who try and get into politics. The world is not so simple and cut and dry.

[D]

No, it's not.

[A]

It is not so easy to just say we shouldn't. Like, people think that the Venezuela move against Maduro was an easy yes or no. No, it wasn't. I say I'm lukewarm on. It's the same thing as Iraq and Afghanistan. That was a debacle for sure. Mistakes were made, horrible mistakes. But the people were just like, the US should never for any reason intervene in their country. I'm like, that's an absolute. It's retarded.

[D]

Yeah. That's ridiculous.

[A]

There are circumstances that will arise. Sometimes you do. We typically want to avoid it. That's why I say, I'm lukewarm on it. Like with the Iran thing. I said, no, we should not be bombing Iran. You will destabilize this region. And we narrowly escaped. And I say, okay, we got out of that one. I'm not a fan of this stuff because the unknowns. But I think you can, you can, you can reduce it down to a more personal experience so the average person can better understand. Right. And I described it the other day like, your neighbor is selling drugs. Do you think, you know, let's say your neighbor's selling pot or. No, no, let's, let's, let's, let's, let's lighten the load. Let's lighten the load. Your neighbor has parties every night. Lots of booze. People are drunk. I don't mind if people are drinking and getting drunk and having parties. I'm not the party police. I'm not going to shut people down and want to have a good time. Now there's beer cans all over the lawn. They're spreading out in the street in front of my house. I got to go clean these things up. Okay, well, I'm going to go to my neighbor's house and I'm gonna knock on the door and be like, hey, guy, look like the beer. Hey, man, I'm not in your property. It's not my problem. It's your problem. You deal with it. At a certain point, it's not so simple to just say, I don't Want to infringe on someone else's right to drink? At a certain point, there's an infringement that must be rounded. Will you take action to benefit yourself over someone who is directly or indirectly aggressing upon you, or are you going to just let it keep happening? It's not always so easy, but I think the challenging issue that most people don't want to recognize is, let's try this. Let me try a scenario for you guys, because I want to play this morality game. Mr. Lectern man, do.

[E]

Do you.

[A]

Do you work anywhere right now, or what are you working on?

[B]

I just finished my book, and I am running a race for county commissioner in Manatee County. You can go to my website and sign up for email list. It is Vote AdamJohnson.com I think it's probably a hard.

[A]

It's probably hard to do a hypothetical with people who are clearly running their own businesses or running for office. But the hypothetical I want to present is you discover that your boss, you work for a great company. It's hypothetical. You work for a company and you're in computer sales, and you discover that your boss has been embezzling money from the company.

[B]

I blackmail him.

[A]

If you out him for doing this, you will lose your job, and your company closes. You have no guarantee you'll have money to feed your children. Do you expose the manager who's embezzling funds?

[B]

No. I'd have to make sure I have another job secure first, because I wouldn't want to work with someone who works like that.

[A]

There's a lot of questions in morality. Like if you had a document that would expose a billionaire for being a pedophile. And then as you're like, I'm going to publish this. A man slides a picture of your daughter through a sniper, through a scope, saying, the moment you press this button, she dies. Do you publish the document?

[B]

Nope. I love my children.

[A]

These are the challenges that people act like don't exist. Right. Is it the right thing to do to expose a corrupt manager who's stealing money from the company? Well, the blowback could destroy the company, and you'll be out of work, and you don't know how you'll get a paycheck to feed your kids. I think a lot of people are going to be like that. I wouldn't expose them. So you'd let a guy steal money, a fraudster, a criminal, rip off a company? Well, I don't want my kids to go hungry. I get these comments all the time on this show. I am not telling anybody what is right or what is wrong. It is a very serious challenge for people. You want to get super hypothetical. Sure. Dan Bongino goes, I got the Epstein list. I'm going to publish it. And then a guy in a suit says, here's a picture of your daughter through a scope. Right. I'm not saying that literally happened, but what do you do in geopolitics in this circumstances?

[D]

Well, and then the other, like, outside of hypotheticals, the other real realities of the American people is I've said this on my show all the time. We've talked about states that are lost causes. We've talked about triaging, you know, getting out of certain states and going fortifying actual states that are winnable. And then we never have to worry about things again. And people will tell me, well, Graham, I can't just move. Like, it's not that simple. But you want to publish a list that hypothetically could collapse the entire American system, government, economic system, and things like that, you're fine with that? But how are you gonna have a job? How are you gonna do this if that happens?

[A]

We should do. You know, we gotta do videos like this. We should totally do this video. We should do videos where we bring people in for, like, you know, like a social experiment. And we, you know, we give them a button, and it's like, if you press this button, you'll receive $1,000, and we will mercilessly beat this puppy.

[D]

You know, like, they'd have hit the button before.

[B]

You don't invite Fauci. He will press that button.

[A]

He will absolutely press that button. That button.

[E]

We keep actually sampling for Haitians, and.

[A]

They'Re just spam, and they're like, do I get to eat the dog?

[E]

Can I? No, don't throw it away.

[B]

No.

[A]

But, you know, it'd be interesting to put people in situations where it's a rock and a hard place. But, you know, it shouldn't be with direct benefit to themselves. It would be like, there's a. You know, there is a man right now. He's a known criminal, and he's beaten and raped women. And you can release this information. It will expose him and he will go to prison. It will also. These 10 people work for his company will lose their jobs, and their families will go without food. Like, how do you decide? And I think most people are gonna be like, expose him. You know what I mean? It's almost like a trolley problem.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

These things exist in every facet of government and every industry, but we're dealing with this one dimensional comic book esque political space where people are like, if it is not zero sum, I'm mad at you. You're a bad guy.

[B]

Oh, rhetoric is very easy. You can go online, you can post things. The common one, I've always heard is if we can't be a nation that arrests pedophiles, we don't deserve to be a nation. And it's a great sentiment and I believe in that sentiment. I really do. If we're protecting pedophiles, that's not good for us. But what can we actually do about it? I'm just a guy, but talk about it, right? And I think the reason we're. A lot of people are mad at Cash, mad at Bondi, mad at Dan, is because they are the people we sent to go do these things. But it can't just be on one person that takes all the responsibility for it. I understand it's their job, but it's also our job to remain, to stay, to stay vocal, to keep talking about these things.

[A]

You know, I don't believe anybody. I'm sorry. Like, I know there are some people who stand true and if you're out there, you know who you are. But let's be real. If the release of the Epstein documents, and I'm not saying this is absolute because I know the responsibility is going to be like.

[D]

But it's not true, Tim.

[A]

No, I'm saying hypothetically, if. If the release of the Epstein documents did implicate enough prominent people from foreign governments to corporations that the U.S. economy would destabilize, knocking us down 80%, would you release the documents? I guarantee you most people are like, of course I would then actually offer them up. What that means you'll lose your home, you'll have no food. Milk will cost $50.

[D]

Health care is gone.

[A]

Health care is gone. People are going to be like, no, I won't do it. Because I hear it all the time from people that they would rather like. We've had these conversations on the show before and we did polls where people are like, I'll put it like this. You can expose all of the Epstein pedophiles. Easily done. Let's take it to the extreme end. You have the file in your hands. You can choose to a digital file, you can press go and the Internet, everyone will have it. Your daughter will die at the same time. Will you do it?

[B]

No.

[A]

No, nobody would. No, nobody would. And I'm not saying that's the reality. I'm giving you an extreme hypothetical. The point Is if it was something as simple as Trump says, our economy is going to take a 20% hit, people will die. Then Dan Bonjino is going to be like, I can't do anything about it. Is he going to be the guy who pulls a trigger and goes on in history, is the one who caused, you know, deaths? Because he was like, these people. And I'm sure what happens behind the scenes is someone like Trump says, do you really want to see the US economy collapse for these 15 assholes? And people are gonna be like, no. So who's really gonna press that button? The truth is, all these people screaming, they would. I doubt they would. No, I might. Well, I've done some crazy person, you.

[D]

Know what I mean?

[A]

I might be like, you know, look, that's why I said, the people who are true to it, they're out there, they know who they are. They'd be like, I don't care. I'll figure it out. I lean in that direction. But I'm not going to pretend to be some, like, moralist guy who's better than everybody who would actually do it, you know, if it came down to it, and the president came to me and said, tim, I'm going to give you the choice. You could press the button. Here's all the bad things that are going to happen. Do you want it to be on you? I might. I'd probably say no, too.

[B]

You press that button, there will be a significant amount more of children who suffer than what happened on the island.

[D]

Well. Well, that. And the very people who want you to release that information or press that button will then turn on you and probably kill you because you destroyed their entire lives in the process.

[A]

They'll make up a reason. A lot of people will be like, you didn't have to do it that way, but you did it wrong.

[B]

Did you see the Bongino statistics, what he did to the FBI? They arrested thousands of pedophiles, and no one's celebrating that. So I don't really think it's about the pedophiles think it's about. We want to see people in power, that they are touchable, that we can get to them. That's what it's about. Because it's about the children. They should be consistent then. We've arrested pedophiles, thousands of them. You just want to see people of power be arrested.

[C]

Just the election of Donald Trump meant that the trafficking of children across the southern border stopped. You know, closing the border, or at least it significantly decreased, you know, yeah, absolutely. So to say that Donald Trump being the president isn't, you know, what are we getting out of it? Nothing's happening.

[D]

Blah, blah, blah.

[C]

I mean, the border's closed. We don't have.

[A]

We had a net.

[C]

Or we had a decline in number of people that are in the. In the country because of deportation.

[E]

Migration.

[C]

Yeah.

[D]

Net.

[C]

Negative migration. So, like, I understand people being frustrated because they're not seeing the results immediately and they're not getting what they want fast enough.

[A]

This is.

[C]

But to say that nothing happened, that's just not true.

[A]

I think the chat right now is actually hilarious in that it's divided between people who say they would actually kill their daughters to publish the Epstein list and others saying it's disgusting. You would consider killing your daughter to publish the Epstein. Like, I know it's an extreme end, but this is the reality of politics, is that there's. It's not. It's not. Yes. No. It's not. Zero sum. It's not. I can just do it. And there's no. There's no ramifications. The idea that Trump got into office and then decided to become evil is laughable. Trump is Trump. The idea that Dan Bongino dedicated his life to calling out all this evil walked through a door and instantly just was transformed to a Sith Lord. It's just not correct. Something is going on we don't understand. And it's a rock and a hard place. Everybody who lives on the outside. One of the challenges in being in politics and being in culture like this kind of space is that most people who watch are not involved. I'm not saying everybody. Those who are, you know who you are and you're going through the fight, but a lot of people just passively watch and they don't have to actually be the one who pulls the trigger.

[D]

Correct.

[A]

That's why I always give respect to veterans, because I met a veteran recently, said he was a big fan and he appreciates what I do. And I was like, I appreciate what you do, man. I complain on the Internet, the shit that our brave men and women have to do and do for us. Most people don't wanna talk about or know about, and they don't have to. So we often rag on liberals who act all high and mighty, not realizing what it takes to make America wealthy and successful. And there's dark evil shit this country does so that we can have cheap computers.

[D]

Yeah.

[C]

The, the, the lines that are.

[D]

The.

[C]

The rant that Jack Nicholson did in A Few Good Men was actually true.

[D]

Yeah.

[C]

Even though Even though it was. He was the bad guy and. And whatnot. Like, it's actually true that, like, you know, brave men or, you know, brave men stand ready to do violent visit violence on bad people so you can sleep soundly in your bed.

[E]

The same thing we do to socialists where we're like, how can you be a socialist, use an iPhone? It's like, same thing. It's like, I am strongly against child exploitation. And then they're wearing Nikes and they're having a cup of Nestle coffee every morning. It's like. It's like, no, I'm. I'm critiquing. The argument about social is like, you're operating in a system that is built on, like, these sorts of really gross stuff no one wants to see. You know, how the sausages. Sausage is made. Yeah, exactly.

[C]

I say that a lot. I just have that argument that people say, oh, you know, these kids are working for no money or dirt, you know, a dollar a day or whatever. It's like, well, you know, a lot of times the option is sexual. You know, sexual solicitation.

[E]

The world is really. Trump said it himself. It's a nasty, angry place. It's like, yeah, you got to make tough decisions.

[B]

Psychology says that. Right. So we. We feel the effect of one person dying more than a thousand people dying. Because we cannot wrap our heads around a thousand people just dying at the same time or a million people dying at the same time.

[D]

Right.

[B]

So we. We're very passionate about when we say, like, that one person, they're suffering.

[A]

Right.

[B]

So we see the girl who was murdered on the bus by the black guy that broke news ever. We see Daniel Penny, it's very easy to see it one time. That stuff happens all the time, thousands of times a day. And around the world. I mean, it happens millions of times a day. We see one thing we're very passionate about.

[E]

Yeah. You get an Instagram reel of, like, you know, someone dying in, like, a hurricane. It's this horrible thing, and you really feel emotional. And then, you know, like, Bangladesh, like a thousand die in a mudslide. And you're like, oh, well, that's why.

[B]

We care about Epstein so much more than, you know, the other. Child trafficking is happening all over the world.

[C]

Yeah.

[B]

That we're obviously complicit into at some level.

[A]

I think the reality of politics, geopolitics, the world and everything is that when it comes down to it, 99% of people would never sacrifice their friends, their families and their security for the collective. The reason why it works on the left is they don't have friends, family, or kids, and the right does. And that's why the right usually gets beaten down. Because when it comes down to it, it's very easy for a crackpot leftist to shoot at your studio and threaten the life of your family and then put us in a position where we're like, we don't want to bring risk to our family. But these leftists don't have families themselves, so they don't face the same risk. And then we're between the rock and the hard place of do we continually expose ourselves to a degenerate faction of evil scumbags who don't face the same fears, the same threats? Most people in politics, you look at some of the things that are happening around the world and you ask yourself why it is that Congress is a bunch of corrupt scumbags who are doing insider trading. It's because nobody wants to risk their families to stop someone else. To put it simply, Nancy Pelosi should be in prison for insider trading. Insider trading. But she's got the power to subpoena you and put you in prison like the J6 committee did to, like, Bannon and Peter Navarro and that. And so you're sitting there, depending on your age, especially with your young kids and your wife, and you're like, if I try to fight this evil person, she will cause harm, not just me, but my family. And the thing that we've brought up is that the founding Fathers made that choice. They sacrificed blood, treasure, and family. Some of their. One guy's wife was kidnapped. One guy has kid, kid. One guy's kid betrayed him. And there are real questions about when people are willing to make those choices. For the most part, right now, in this country, nobody wants to go head to head against these corrupt forces in government, because these corrupt forces in government will arrest you and your lawyers. They will make up fake crimes about you. They will go on TV and accuse you of working for Russia or some other psychotic nonsense. They will lie and claim that you've abused women or that you stole a lectern you didn't steal.

[B]

Yeah, that happens. And I would be remiss if I didn't mention that January 6th, there were about 1,600 people that were willing to risk their freedom to speak up and say, our country is being stolen from us. So I do think those people do exist. I think the entire reason they're still doing this is to remind you we will come after you if you ever do this again.

[A]

That's the point in the future. Exactly. Why are Democrats having a candlelight vigil? To say to anybody who would make the choice to risk everything, their family, blood, treasure, or otherwise, they're going to destroy you and everyone around you. It is the kill you and three generations of your family threat.

[B]

Yeah, I get that question all the time. Would I do it again now it's been five years later, and I say at this point, absolutely, yes. I think it woke a lot of people up across the couple years of them hunting us down.

[A]

What did you really do?

[B]

I walked around maliciously. That's the point.

[A]

It's like, you didn't wage war. You walked into a room through the velvet ropes, and everybody was seemingly on a tour with cops, taking selfies with people, and you picked up a lectern and waved and put it down.

[B]

It is true.

[A]

To be fair, you weren't like Braveheart, you know, clanking your sword and being like, they can never take our freedom.

[B]

I mean, it's like throwing tea over a boat, you know?

[A]

You know, without. With all due respect, it was less than that.

[B]

I know I should have taken it home. I should have done something different.

[A]

There were. There were rioters that were there that committed crimes and all that stuff, but it's. It's laughably insane the lengths they went to to destroy the lives of people who did barely anything. People who walked into an open door and took a selfie with a cop and then got a year in jail because of it.

[E]

Yeah, they made an example. That's all they're trying to do. I mean, that's why, you see, following the Charlie Kirk assassination, you sit back and you say, okay, I'm an ethical person. How could someone even possibly conjure up the thought to, like, mock Charlie Kirk after his death? These sorts of things. It's like, that's the point. They want to say what Charlie Kirk was doing was viable. It was a threat to the system, so to speak. Don't ever try that again or you'll be next. That was the point of that. And that's why they put the pictures up everywhere. That's why they do the vigils. They want to remind you, like, hey, you try that. You want to end up like him? Oh, you want to end up like him. Okay, here's a picture there. That's going to be you. It's going to be your father. It's going to be your husband.

[D]

Yeah.

[A]

It's funny because, you know, I was talking to this liberal guy who's always arguing with me, and I Said, you know, we're not going to be at the studio anymore because of the shooting. And I said, look how easy it is. All liberals have to do is murder a few conservatives, then take some shots at me and they can shut us up. Right. And that's part of what I'm sick of with these, with the left, the millennial woes tweet that basically exemplifies the culture war. Leftists pretending like they don't understand things to make discourse impossible. There is no reality where these progressive personalities are unaware that as conservatives and moderate right leaning individuals that are facing the real threat of death, someone's attention tried breaking into J.D. vance's home with a hammer, smashing out his windows. This isn't happening to the left.

[D]

Correct.

[A]

They just lie and pretend it is.

[C]

The, the, the lion pretended. Is that the way that they treat themselves as victims? The way that they pad the numbers whenever it comes to how many politically motivated attacks are, are performed by the left versus the right? They, they've been basically controlling the narrative for so long that your average person, you know, believes them. And the more we try to get the word out, the more pushback you get.

[E]

Yeah, well, they're perpetually in rebellion and revolution. They have a revolutionary mindset. And so it's like you always have to keep throwing meat into the grinder to keep the revolution going. If the left ever just, they'll never actually come to a point where like, all right, I think we've won. Let's all sit back and reap the rewards. They're perpetually in a revolutionary mindset because they again perceive themselves as transgressed. They perceive themselves as victims. Like they're, they're, and they have their, their boogeyman like straight white men. Like that's, that's they still perceive as running every echelon of society even though like, you know, like that compact mag article like completely lays out like, no, it's actually the opposite.

[B]

Yeah, we do our microaggressions like we open doors for ladies. We're just the worst. We put our shopping carts back.

[E]

It's horrible.

[A]

There's a comment here that I think makes a good example of like the destabilization we're facing. And it's small rabid monkey says. I mean, you are a bit of a coward, Tim. That, that, that I think that comment really does exemplify why we lose in the long run and why we've, we, you know, we've had tremendous victories. I do think there's some optimism to, to look forward to right now, it's tough, it's tough not to be black pilled, but imagine. And again, I will stress too like this could be a bot, it could be a liberal masquerading as someone on the right trying to destabilize things. I'll give you, I'll give you an example of like why I'm singling this one out. We had Father Ripperger on the culture war and I talked about, I asked him, he's talking about demonic possession, demonic obsession, which is where the demon's influencing you as opposed to being within you. And he said when people are effectively advocating for things that are wrong or bad, they're being influenced. I had Seamus Coughlin on and Seamus brings this up as well as G Prime 85. I recommend you guys follow G Prime. He's an amazing artist. And conservatives insult artists, comedians, gamers. They insult me for skateboarding. And I asked the father if that was demonic and he said yes. The reason why is regular people live in these spaces and you have to fish where the fish are. If there are people attacking you to try and get you to stop doing good work, it's demonic. If you are an artist like Seamus Coughlin or G Prime and you're trying to bring comedy to Americans that expresses and explains a conservative worldview in a funny way that makes them come into the house, if people then try to stop that work from happening, it's demonic. That's what he was saying, that someone like Seamus, who's a devout Catholic, who makes funny videos, this is entertaining to regular people and it will open the door for them to come into his worldview. Deeply religious, devout, and then he's surrounded by conservatives screaming at him to stop because he's childish and it's for babies and he's wasting his time and wasting his life, right? That's demonic. So for these people, I would say two things. One, this could just be a liberal trying to antagonize me. It's troll, it's fake. But there are many conservatives who do this, sit in their houses, don't engage in the culture war, aren't getting shot at, and then smugly sit there and insult you for doing it, seemingly only to try and get you to stop. Because again, the reason why I say it could be a liberal, because now I'm faced with two, two, two distinct scenarios from both sides. Death threats and getting shot at, which is a risk to me and my family that I don't want to deal with, and conservatives insulting me over it. Why would I fight for you, why would I risk getting shot at? For you sitting at home doing nothing, insulting me Again, I stress probably a liberal, and I largely ignore these things. But when you're looking at prominent conservative personalities that have been on this show that are stabbing me in the back, lying about me because they're more concerned with Zejus than having real conversations, my question is, why would I risk getting shot for you?

[B]

I know for me, I've not been shot at, but the death threats, I mean, I still get those on a very regular basis. For me, it's because I have convictions and because I'm not someone who will just sit by and watch things happen. I have children and, and their futures are important to me. It's why I'm doing things like getting involved locally with my community and running for office there.

[A]

And that's why I think local is really the key. Try, you know, the fault here comes to a nation scale thing where you're, you're fighting for people you don't know who hate you. Right? Not everybody, but many people, I'd argue. I have sometimes had more fans than haters, that people who hate me don't even know who I am. They don't follow the show. So, like, when we, when we go out, we go places, we never run into anybody who's actually like, I hate you. Because they don't know. The people who don't like me don't even know what I look like. But there is a challenge again, to go back to like the Dan Baggino conversation of here's a guy who literally sacrificed everything to try and do it, and when he couldn't do it, they insult him and they're trying to burn him to the ground. And I'm just like, you can be disappointed in the guy and you can say, you, you failed, that's fine. But it's weird to me that they're acting like Dan's evil.

[B]

Yeah, I genuinely feel bad for him. I don't. I mean, he would not leave his podcast. He would not leave a nice comfortable life to go into a place to not do what he said he was going to do. So he, so what? Lose his reputation when he goes back? None of that makes sense. It's not rational. It doesn't make sense at all.

[D]

Well, and it's from the same people that. Look what Dan had to give up to go. I know what I had to give up to go to the Pentagon. You're not allowed to make any money outside of what you're getting paid from the Federal government, which is not a lot. It's expensive. In D.C. they don't pay you a lot. You get max taxes pulled out across the board. These same people that are mad at Dan Bongino or me or whoever it is, again, they're the same people. Look what Dan gave up. Millions and millions of dollars to come out and be ridiculed by people. Back to my earlier comment, that won't even move out of horrific cities where their families are not safe because they're worried about their paycheck of two grand, every paycheck, or something like that. You're the same people that are. You would not do what Dan Bongino did. Yeah. And so are you really mad at Dan Bongino or are you mad because now you see that it's worse than you thought it was?

[A]

And I'll stress this too, because I would, I would say ignore the direct comments on Dan Bongino, you, the threats against yourself, me. But look at the movement on the right right now and what the right is doing. And the question I have is, is the right something worth fighting for? And if there is a large faction of prominent individuals who are either degenerate evil scum or cowardly backing degenerate evil scum, I have to ask. It's not about one person insulting me. It's a question of what the movement is and what it would do should it succeed. Now, I know you made the point. You have convictions and you're finding those. You want a better future for your kids. Completely agree. The question then is, is the time and energy I'm spending doing this and the risks accrued actually going to be a net benefit for my kids. I don't believe that if the right moves in the direction of Candace Owens, it will be something worth preserving or making happen in the future. And thus I would oppose it and fight against it, which is why I've criticized her. And again, it's not about her. It's about what she represents. And it's about people like Megyn Kelly who are continually backing her and lining up in her space. It's about people like Matt Strickland who put a knife in my back because he wants to cozy up to her. It's up to people that know she's lying but don't actually care about what the future is. So when I see these trends and these movements among these individuals that, again, Candace literally used the same security as Charlie Kirk, it's an easily provable fact. It's so patently obvious she worked for Turning Point you don't even need to say anything beyond that. And she's lying about it. But people don't care because she has views and they're gonna follow that. Is that group of people something we want to help? If the right wins, is she and the people around her going to benefit from it? We don't want that. Well, then the question is, what is the right actually fighting for? Because if prominent individuals like Megyn Kelly is a great example, she's repeatedly just been demure to Candace and refused to just say, literally, Candace is making shit up and lying. Many people have come out and called her out on it. But again, there's a few other people that I'm not going to name because we have no public beef. But people have been on the show who have lost their faith fucking minds and are no longer talking about populist issues or foreign wars. They're screaming about Israel 24, 7. I'm not here to fight for those people. So if I'm getting shot at and I've got psychotic, you know, retards like, you know, in the Candace's sphere, and then you've got cowards unwilling to stand up tour, do I really want to risk things for that future? No. Then what do you do? Well, we got to figure out what we are fighting for and who we are fighting for. And the challenge I see now is the right is fracturing and the left is fractured. Not a single Democrat that might correctly call out something Trump has done. Or these crackpot conservatives is worth defending because they defend child sex changes all the same. But I'm not gonna defend the Zajuz people who live in retard world either. So then who is our community and what is the future gonna look like? Honestly, I have no idea. In the meantime, do I wanna get shot at not knowing what I'm fighting for? Honestly, it doesn't seem like it makes sense.

[E]

Yeah, well, it's not sufficient to just be the opposition. I mean, that was the problem with the Republican Party for, again, 60, 70 years, is they're just primarily the opposition party. They were just. Slow down. What the Democrats were trying to do and manage the decline. And like, if you're in politics, your entire job, whether you're in media or like, you know, actually in elected office, your entire job is you have a set of ideas or a set of, you know, a vision for how you want America to be. And then you have to identify the political vehicles that are viable to bring forth this vision. And yeah, like Tim's saying, we're Kind of entering this period where engines or vehicles that are not viable are now starting to lead the pack. And in some regards, and it's just you sit back and you go, okay, this is a little frustrating.

[A]

You know, I've heard from so many people where they, in politics where they say, tim, just get your bag. And if you look at a lot of the prominent personalities, it's very clear that they're just trying to get their bag.

[C]

Yeah.

[A]

And so it's just like, it's kind of disheartening. It's like, were we actually fighting for a better country or were y' all just trying to get a bag? And you've got two worlds. You've got the Democrats who are propped up, I should say Democrat personalities. These podcasters that say obviously like post obvious lies. David Pakman, I'll say his name a million times, scumbag. He'll post things that are obviously not true because it gets clicks. Brian Tyler Cohen. Every video he's posting is a picture of Trump. Get your bag. And now you've got people on the right that are just like, I don't know much about much, but Candace is getting views. I'm going to defend whatever she's saying even though it's clearly bullshit.

[B]

Well, to Graham's point, I think you nail on the head of this, you make more money if you lose the midterms. As a conservative pundit, that's 1 million percent.

[D]

Yes.

[B]

And so I think there's a, that's probably the driving reason why they are trying to tank the MAGA party, which is why midterms are so important. Guys, listen, it takes longer than a year to fix what has gone on even just the past four years. Biden administration, they've had a lot of time to mess some things up. It's going to take some time to unwind that clock. You have to show up for midterms. You have to vote. Don't listen to these people who are doom scrolling, these people who are just trying to bury the bus. We can still win this thing.

[A]

They are. It's not going to happen after the midterms. But if The Republicans lose 20, 28, they're going to pack the courts. Yeah, yep, they're going to that. I, I think they'll probably curtail presidential pardon power.

[B]

I'm going back to prison for sure.

[C]

Yeah, I mean that's true. The, they, they will be going after person personalities and stuff like that. I think that the, the, the things that the Democrats want to do it, it'll go beyond packing the court, they'll do things like they'll blow up the filibuster so they can do all this stuff they'll get rid of, they'll try to make.

[A]

That's going to happen in midterms. Yeah, probably, yeah. If they win the House and the Senate. Filibuster's gone. In a second.

[C]

In a second.

[A]

And then start ramming everything they can't do. But Trump's gonna veto and block a.

[C]

Lot of it until a Democrat actually wins the presidency.

[B]

Kinda sounds like Thune should do something then while we still have time.

[A]

Yeah, sure.

[E]

Oh, yeah, you have the Republicans where Chuck Grassley comes out and like, we need to get rid of the blue slip system. Like, Trump can't get his judges across the finish line. And then he's like, well, you know, it's an important principle. Cause during the Biden administration, we use it and it's like, dude, we're getting shot at. Like, like, what are we doing? Principles kind of out the window. Like, we need to win now because if this MAGA movement fails, it's tough to see the calculus after that. Like, it's going to be different, like hours.

[C]

The only thing that matters. I understand that there are people that are like, well, you know, principle matters, et cetera, et cetera. We live in the real world. Principle does not actually provide you with victory. Principle is a way to say, well, you know, we lost and it's an excuse for losing. We live in the real politic world. So, like, the important thing is victory. So it doesn't matter. It doesn't matter that you don't like to work with this person or that you feel kind of squishy about something. Victory, winning, having, you know, running the scoreboard up on your side is the only thing that matters. And the, the situation that we're in today where people on the right are getting killed, people on the right are being put in jail for bs. BS charges. Like that will only get worse.

[E]

Yeah, well, yeah, principle only matters if your opposition also has principles and then you have competing principles. But we're in a situation where one side has principles. This is the entire, like, this is what, the back to the Venezuela thing, this is why it's driving so many of these people that are sort of adherent to the old system crazy. Because it's like, Trump accurately views other countries as self interested and he's like, America should be self interested. We should apply that to politics. We should be self interested. What's in it for us? How do we win?

[A]

Let me ignore the federal courts. Let's take a story on. I know we're running a little late, but I want about to talk. Talk about this. My friends from the Financial Times. Influencers and only fan models dominate us. Extraordinary artist visas. They're hookers. All of them. Work permits increasingly being awarded on the basis of online reach favoring content creators. Yeah. The only fans things. Was this what we were fighting for? Is this. Can we. Can we.

[B]

We've been fighting for nice boobies our entire.

[A]

Yeah, we wanted. We wanted Trump to bring in porn stars and hookers on our 01 visas.

[C]

Did Alex Stein get elect or get a job? There's coming in. Is that it?

[A]

I think the. I think the challenging reality that we have that people don't want to understand is the problem. Rome wasn't built in a day. We can't turn around and solve all the problems at once because they're interconnected. And so what do you do? Trump goes full dictator despot and just overnight rewrites everything and locks everything down. So I think we're gonna be stuck with this kind of BS and Trump's gonna be only a marginal success. To be fair, he's a little bit more than marginal. I mean, getting rid of USAID was massive. So I think it's a historic presidency, but it's not going to be as much as needs to happen. And we have to WIN probably another 12 to 13 years of presidential power and Congress and the Senate to truly start turning the ship around.

[D]

We would have to win another 10 to 12 election cycles. Yeah. To truly turn it around. And that's what. When I got out of the Pentagon and came back to the mic on the show, that's what I told everybody. I said the main thing, I want everyone to know this is my kind of Paul Revere moment. That, like, the battle is not over. It's not the British are coming, but the, you know, the Dems are coming. Like, like, like. It is not over. We've got to win again and again and again and again and again. And I think that's what you're going to hear. When Dan eventually does go back to his show, I think he will also echo those points. I don't see Dan coming out and defending himself a lot. I see him taking the approach of, I don't care what those idiots have to say. This is what really is going on and this is why I'm back. We have to win these midterms because to your point, Donald Trump will be impeached. He's Already said he knows it. He'll be impeached. Every secretary we have will be dragged in front of Congress. They will probably try to put Pete Hegseth behind bars for war crimes. All of this stuff will happen. Every one of us that was on the FBI's watch list that we now know we were. What do you think will happen in 28? If we don't win in 28, they're going to come after us harder than they ever did during the Biden administration. These are all things that are really going to happen. These are the realities of things that are going to happen. So you can sit and you can whine and you can moan and you can complain all you want to. Maybe it's bots, maybe it's foreign entities. Whatever it may be. Maybe it's big tech companies might want to fracture the. Right. Whatever it may be, if we keep going down this road, we will lose the midterms, we will lose 2028, and then we will have 2020 through 2024, 10x of what it was. And that is what?

[A]

Triple masks.

[E]

Yeah.

[A]

Yes.

[D]

Where three of them. They will lock you down again. They will. We will go to social credit scores. Like all these things are real.

[E]

Yeah.

[D]

And the. The average American has not felt that. We have felt that because we've had big tech go after us. You've been put in prison. You've had people shoot at you in your house. I get 100 death threats a day. We call it a Tuesday, you know, at the office. Like, we deal with actual targeting against us for our views and what we think and what we feel. The average American has not had to deal with that. That is just the truth. And a lot of people see us right now, Tim. I know they see it in your face because I see it in your face, too. They see it in mine. In the show, we know more than we did 10, 12 years ago when we first started doing this. We have seen more. We have. And we are in real time watching what's going on. And we're also trying to discern and figure out which way is this thing turning. Who's real, who's not, who's actually on the team, who's just in it to get their bag, as you said, Tim, who. Who can we actually trust? I'm being generous. When I think. When I say I think, you can automatically say 50% of the people that you listen to and that you watch are not in it to help you. They do not give a crap about this country. They do not care if it burns to the ground. And they just want their money and. Or they want the power of being famous.

[E]

Yeah.

[D]

And that's generous. 50%. I think it's more 87, 90% personally. But. But that is where we really are.

[E]

Yeah.

[D]

And people don't want to hear it, but that is the truth.

[E]

Yeah.

[B]

Silver linings. If they do get back into power, it means I get my TSA special time again, which is, you know, always.

[E]

Ask you about your pre check.

[B]

I do not really.

[E]

You should.

[A]

You should apply.

[B]

I should.

[E]

Post check. I think now check.

[A]

You apply for pre check and they add post check. It's a red check mark.

[B]

Most airports, if you're flying first, you get to go through that lane anyway.

[E]

The.

[B]

The handful.

[D]

Yeah.

[A]

A guaranteed 100 random bag checks. It's totally random, but it will happen every time.

[D]

Every time.

[E]

It's one of those things that's like. It was after the Charlie Kirk assassination. I think people realize this is like, when the left says things. You actually should believe them when they say these things because they actually intend on doing it. Like, I get tweets every day. If you have expressed any support for the mass deportations with ISIS operations, you're on a list. Like, people don't realize this. Even if you're like, have a small Twitter account. If it's your name on there and you've tweeted like, these things, I promise you. Go to archive.org Someone has logged your account. They've documented it. It's on Internet Archive. So the commentariat. But even like patriots that are supporting the commentariat are cooked if the Democrats get back in. Because when they tweet, they tweet at me all the time. They're like, Nuremberg trials for conservatives. It's coming. You're in trouble. I actually believe them. I'm like, yeah, if they ever get back in power, they do intend on doing that. When they tweeted they were going to.

[A]

Kill Charlie and then Charlie got killed.

[E]

Yeah. It's like, believe these people when they say these things and get moving. Like, it's. It's crazy.

[D]

Well, well, people get mad at people like Tim, all of us, because we get behind the mic and they can see we are frustrated. Right. But these are the same people that Dan Bongino, when he was deputy director in his office, looks me in the eye and go, yeah, you're on all kinds of lists in here. Like, you know what I mean? Like, like, we know. We know that. We know that we know. And they're gonna go after us. First, because we're the dissenting voices, we are the ones they're gonna go after us to make examples out of us for all of the other people that watch us. And then when we're not there anymore, they're going to go after everybody else. So it's frustration. Tim, to your point, we're trying to work it out in our heads. At the same time we're, we're fighting for this country, but this country is now turning against us because we're not bobbing and weaving with every freaking thing because they're not the, the trending thing going on.

[A]

They're not for this country. They're an extra national force that wants to create global economic blocks. The liberal economic order may have started with the United States, but it's effectively an extra governmental entity that just puppet strings the United States. And the problem is, how do you stop someone who's figured it out? And any conspiracy, right, someone goes, I'm onto something. I think I have evidence that you're doing a thing. You want them to go in the wrong direction. So I mentioned this with Pizzagate. People started to say, hey, these emails from the Democrats are really weird. What's this talking about a handkerchief with a map on it? What could that mean? What do they mean when they said is it more fun to do domino play? Domino's on pizza or on pasta? Okay, well if I was working in government and I was concerned that people figured out Democrats were having drunken drug fueled orgies, how do you break that, that chain? They inserted fake stuff about comet ping pong and pizza restaurants. A guy went and shot the ground looking for a basement that didn't exist. Everyone then is told, see, it's not really or crazy and it dissipates. So when you are begin talking about the liberal economic order formed after the, after World War II to create economic blocks. Their view was the World bank switch payment system. We will prevent World War III by making everybody trade with each other. That's why Canada with no bauxite mines refines aluminum for the United States. I mean we have bauxite mines in Louisiana. Why are we importing aluminum from Canada? Canada imports their raw minerals from China and like New guinea and Brazil. It's because the goal is war stops if you're dependent upon each other. That's the liberal economic order plan. When people start pointing this out, what do you do? Tell them it's the Jews. Then they sound like they're retarded and won't actually be able to pinpoint who's Doing what? Because, remember, for a long time, what were we all talking about? The World Economic Forum and the Davos Group. These same people are now tweeting the Jews all day. I assure you, random, regular Jews have nothing to do with what the World Economic Forum. Economic Forum is doing. There may be some people who are Jewish, but if you go to someone and say, there is a group, the Davos Group, there is Soros, there is the World Economic Forum, there is the Council on Foreign Relations, these things exist. You can read their websites, here's what they're doing. I think it's a bad thing. Enough people start calling out, you will own nothing and you will be happy. You will eat the bugs. And they go, crap. How do we get them off this? Put Candace on the front page and never screams at Jews. Now, the people that were once talking about the Davos Group are talking about the Jews, and they sound like they're retarded. That's how you break it apart. So to the point, what is happening with this country? When you say they're going to put us on list and they're going to do these things to us, it's not America that's doing it. Trump is America. We're America. It's the forces outside of America that want to create an international order since World War II that are looking at us like basically chickens in a chicken coop that are ruffling feathers. And you know what you do with chickens that are causing fights? You eat them.

[C]

Yep. Globo homo.

[A]

That's right.

[C]

Global homogenization.

[A]

Yeah. So if. Look, if I had five chicken coops and I was like, they're always fighting with each other. I want to make it so that they can all be in one cooperation. If there's one route that's causing problems, you ax them, you pull them out, you string them up, you chop, set up, you eat them, and then that's what they're doing. The interests here are international. They are not pro America. And they have influence in our politics. They have influence in the uk And I don't consider them to be pro America. It's NATO, it's the Western powers. And then I have to deal with these retards that are like, you mean it's Israel? No, Israel's on a puppet string, too. Don't be stupid. But they are. And because of people like that, that's why we struggle to form a coalition and actually go against them. But let me just stress this again. Five years ago, what was everyone saying? Davos Group, World Economic Forum, Council, on foreign relations, liberal economic order, Swift payment system, International Monetary Fund. Now, what are all the people saying? Israel. We were on the right track for a while.

[E]

Yeah, well, I mean, look, this is the ultimate way to determine who's the most viable threat to the system. It's like, are they targeting radicals, these people that are like really edgy and these sorts of things? No, they're targeting people that have occupied the mainstream and reoriented it. Charlie Kirks.

[A]

I do want to stress one thing too, because I went to the. I was at a Davos group. I'm sorry. I was in Davos during the World Economic Forum back in. I think it was 2017. So I didn't get into the World Economic Forum. But outside of the main conference they have these pop up events. It's kind of like a wealthy internationalist south by Southwest. And I'll just say that as I said it before, I'll say it again, the theme there was that cryptocurrency was going to be the global machine. And it's funny because 2017, what was Bitcoin's price back then?

[C]

2017? It was like, it just hit $20,000, I think.

[A]

I think it was briefly. 20 dropped back down to like, you.

[C]

Know, it dropped all the way down to 3,000.

[A]

Yeah, something like that. At this time, I have all of these global elites and politicians and family of royalty in and around Davos and they're saying our intention. They didn't say like we are going to conquer the world and make everyone use crypto. They were saying our company, our family, our politicians, our government. We want crypto to be the thing. Look where crypto is now. It's expanding. It's growing. I think it's very clear that international elites of varying political factions, their intention is to make crypto the currency of the. It exists for a reason. But we gotta go to your rants and super chats with the time that we have left before we do. We got a great sponsor for you. It is webroot. Go to webroot.com pool. Shout out to Webroot for sponsoring today's show. Live a better digital life with webroot and get 50% off webroot total protection or Webroot Essentials when you go to webroot.com pool. We understand cybersecurity is not a sexy product. However, that's better than the confidence that comes. I'm sorry, what's better than the confidence that comes at knowing your digital life is protected from malware, ransomware, identity theft, accidental deletions, natural disasters and more. Webroot is for your digital life like Geico or State Farmers. For your physical life, it's protection for for just you or for the whole family. But really the whole family. When we say protection for up to 10 identities, we mean it. Those 10 identities do not have to live under one roof. You can protect yourself, your spouse, your kids, your parents, your in laws, your crazy aunt, et cetera. Plus there's dedicated Elder Fraud Elder Fraud hotline to help remediate incidents and assist caregivers. You shouldn't have an antivirus that acts like a virus. WebRute Essentials won't interrupt your daily life. It's 33 times smaller and scans your devices six times faster than competitors. It also installs faster than competitors so you can get protected quickly and back to living your life with peace of mind that you that it's not going to slow your computer down. If you don't have the identity protection, you're not protected. During a data breach every time you check the box for a company to remember your credit card, your safety is dependent on that company's cybersecurity. So when that company has a breach, unfortunately most often that means your info goes with it. When you have Webroot Total protection, your information is protected by dark web financial identity monitoring Alerts and alerts get 5050 off Web Root Total [e-mail] Pool shout out let's grab your rants and chats my friends with the Sorry I went a little long. You know we're ranting. Let's see. Unit Unit loses apologies Demon and portal at AM Fest 25 on LG screen. It's on 8 hour video at 3 hours and 43 minutes and 40 seconds. Channel right side broadcasting network video titled Live Replay. TPO says America Fest conference. We pulled that up. Wasn't there? We pulled it up last night. Didn't see anything. Video titled live replay TPUSA's America Fest Conference Day 212 19, 2025 on the LG screen. You want to try and find it?

[C]

Yeah, I'm looking.

[A]

All right, Phil's gonna try and find it.

[C]

What time did he say?

[A]

3:43:43. And I'm sorry. 3:43:40. KC85 says Noble 6 from Discord here got laid off today. Makes it more irritating. Alleged criminals and other Democrat funded leeches have drained billions of our taxes. That could help people like myself.

[D]

Preach.

[A]

Bummer. Yep. Shane Water says prayers out to the crew. Really do appreciate it. Callan's pretty banged up, but he was discharged. Mark staying overnight. Hopefully everything's good. But I don't want to say. I. I don't know if serious is the right to describe it, but I think serious. Were the injuries like Mark's? Mark's pretty bad, you know, but we think he's going to be okay. So, you know, hoping for the best. Pinochet says, for the record, not one damn corrupt federal agent was fired. Do nothing Dan didn't do.

[D]

Ish.

[A]

That is a line of BS from this guest. I'm gonna say it again, brother. You don't know what's going on in the machine.

[D]

That's also not true. They did. And then they got blocked from firing everything. The same thing that happened in the Pentagon. All the department at the time, DOD employees that were let go and they had voluntary let go and then some were being let go. They got blocked by the courts and then. And then they ruled that they had to hire them back. And all this other kind of stuff. You don't know what you're talking about. Go back and read it. Go back and look at all the articles.

[A]

Just to put it simply, I don't understand this idea that before Dan went in, everyone's like, yes. Then Dan goes in, you don't get what you want, and Dan comes out. We're the same place we were before he went in. I don't understand.

[B]

These are the people saying the FBI needs to be shut down. What is the premise of that? The FBI is not something that can be recovered from. So that hasn't changed, has it? So when Dan goes in, if your premise was the FBI, should you shut down? It's not safe, it's not salvageable. What changed? You thought Dan could do it. No. Your premise still is the same.

[A]

I think you're. I just don't understand why it's zero sum. Like you're. All of a sudden, Dan's like, Dan's not accomplished anything good. He's done. He's done so much good. Why is this one thing he messed up, making him a bad person now?

[E]

He didn't press the fix everything button. How dare him? It's right there on his desk and he never pressed it.

[A]

I think it's fine if someone says he failed. I'm disappointed. He was a terrible deputy FBI director, but he's done a lot of great work. I look forward to him coming back and working and doing more for us. Like, I don't understand why it's not. He's bad now forever. I'm like what? It's not zero sum. Take as much positive as you can. If he didn't do the best job, if he didn't do a good job, if he did a bad job, fine, call him out, criticize him for it, and then wish him the best to keep working on behalf of us. When he comes back to his show, is it the most effective place he can be? It may be. People are making fun of him being like, oh, now that Dan's leaving the FBI, he's gonna get the job done. I'm like, yeah, maybe it's the best place for him. Like, no, maybe he's not good at being in the FBI.

[D]

I don't know.

[E]

Yeah, it's like. Or we can just wait and see what he has to say. I mean, like, we haven't even really heard much from Dan yet.

[D]

Well, also, even if. Even if. Which is not true, but hypothetically, even if Dan accomplished nothing and he was this terrible deputy director, which he was not. Even if, okay, the guy tried. Yeah, he tried. He. He did what 300 plus million other Americans would not do, especially giving up what he gave up to go do it. He tried. Even if he did hypothetically suck at it, which he didn't. But even if he did, at least he tried, right? You know, can the majority of Americans say that? No, they can't.

[A]

And so I love this one Hapsa. Did he says, hold on, didn't Tim have a meeting with Netanyahu? And he's the one that keeps saying the Jews trying to discredit a legitimate complaint about foreign influence on our government. You have zero credibility. You know who else met with Netanyahu?

[D]

Trump.

[A]

Yeah, that proves it. That proves that Trump actually is the. Is only the vice president. Netanyahu is the president of America.

[D]

Netanyahu was actually just with Trump. This is crazy.

[E]

You wanna hear something crazy that proves it? And if you go to Netanyahu's Wikipedia page and go to early life, he's Jewish.

[B]

Shut up.

[E]

Yeah, I know. Every time it's like these Israeli prime ministers, every time it's Jewish, it's like, what? I'm starting to think Israel ran by Jews. That's just me.

[C]

Singleberg, Timeowitz, Ma Mason says, tim, I.

[A]

Have a theory that will make everyone mad. Netanyahu took your warning about the indifference and anti. Antipathy of America's future towards Israel and paid off evil people to make that. I, I disagree. Because the right and the left hate Israel. I like, this is the thing about the Israel conspiracy theory. Israel is retarded I'm sorry. It's just true. They are miserably bad at pr. Nothing that they're doing is like, Charlie told them that.

[D]

Charlie. That. That was in Charlie's note.

[A]

He did a. He did a. He did a seminar with Gen Z, with Andrew Colvett to convince Gen Z that Israel was good. Like, that's what he was doing for Israel. Israel is so bad at pr. Everyone hates them. And I don't understand this conspiracy theory where it's like, you know, Israel's controlling everything. Then why does everyone hate them?

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Why is YouTube propping up Candace Owens? Israel must not control YouTube. YouTube is the last rebellion. Is that what it is? YouTube is the last place for free speech to call out Israel, I guess.

[D]

Why are the people that make the most money doing what we do? Are they allowed to talk about Israel and talk bad about Israel by the very premise? If Israel controls everything, then why do those of us that make the most money. Tucker Carlson, Megy Kelly, Candace Owens, all these people, they make the most money out of all of us that do this.

[E]

Yeah.

[D]

And they all hate Israel.

[A]

Breaking the rules.

[D]

Why are they allowed to do it? That doesn't make sense.

[E]

It's. It's safe. Edgy, too, because it's like there was a time where it was a little controversial and you could get in trouble or, you know, have some issues. None of them had anything to say. It's. As soon as it's like now in vogue to critique Israel, they can be like. Like you have these comedians getting up and they're like, I'm worried about my life. If I say something about Israel, I'm like, dude, you have the biggest podcast.

[B]

Well, if you want, there's. There's an idea. I've heard that if you want to make people believe antisemitism is real, then you have to promote it. Right. And so maybe the large amount of things we're hearing online feel being propped up is them saying, see, anti Semit Semitism is real and it's everywhere.

[A]

I mean, that would mean that in the next few years they will be censored and shut down. And perhaps it's a false flag, maybe that you get this, this, you know, Candace, massive show, Ian Carroll, all of these ZIJU people. And on the left and the right, a year or two later, the government comes down and says, see, look at this problem. We need a censor. And that's how they bring censorship back.

[B]

Yeah, I think it's all game retarded.

[A]

We got to go to the uncensored portion of the show. But I've got one super chat I want to read from Raymond G. Stanley Jr. Adam, do you regret taking part in the second 9 11?

[B]

No, not a bit. Honestly, at this point, I think we should have done more.

[A]

All right, we're gonna go to the uncensored portion of the show. Go to rumble.com timcast IRL and we're gonna talk a little bit more about what there's going on here. And it's gonna be uncensored, so we're gonna say naughty things. You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Adam, do you want to shout anything out?

[B]

Yeah, Please buy my book. I need money. It's on my website. Unlicensed furnituremirs.com and then I'm running for county commissioner, Manatee County. That website is@vote adamjohnson.com. you'll be able to donate tomorrow or the next day, but for now, sign up for the email list. You can find out what's coming.

[A]

Right on.

[D]

Oh, yeah, Graham Allen, make sure to check out our show on exclusively on rumble every morning, 9am Eastern time. Go give us a follow on Rumble.

[E]

Yeah, Real Tate Brown on X and Instagram. Same pitch, but I'm at noon, so come hang out tomorrow. We'll see you there live.

[C]

I am Phil that Remains on Twix. The band is all that remains. We are going on tour this spring. We're going to be out with Born of Osiris and Dead Eyes. It's going to start April 29th and it'll go through, I think, May 23rd or something like that. You can check out the band all that Remains at Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, Spotify, YouTube and Deezer. Do not forget, the left lane is for crime.

[A]

We will see you all [e-mail] Timcast IRL in about 30 seconds. Thanks for hanging out.

[D]

Sam.