Trump Tariffs Spark Global PANIC, Countries BEG Trump, CAVE To His Demands w/ Tiffany Cianci

Summary

Timcast IRL: Trump Tariffs Spark Global PANIC, Countries BEG Trump, CAVE To His Demands w/ Tiffany Cianci

Release Date: April 4, 2025
Host: Tim Pool
Guest: Tiffany Cianci

---

1. Introduction

In this episode of Timcast IRL, host Tim Pool engages in a comprehensive discussion with guest Tiffany Cianci, a small business advocate, alongside co-hosts Elad Eliyahu and Phil Labonte. The conversation delves into the recent tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump, their global repercussions, the stock market's reaction, media portrayals, and broader themes surrounding economic policy and free speech.

---

2. Trump’s Tariffs and Global Reactions

Tim Pool initiates the discussion by highlighting a significant report from the Financial Times: Donald Trump’s imposition of tariffs has triggered a global response, with various countries offering concessions to mitigate impacts.

Key Points:

• Concessions from Global Powers: Countries such as the European Union and Japan are proactively offering measures like reducing their own tariffs and increasing energy purchases to preempt the effects of Trump’s tariffs.

  "Brussels has offered to drop car tariffs from 10% to Washington levels of 2.5%." [04:23]

• Political Polarization: The reaction to the tariffs is sharply divided along political lines, with conservatives viewing them favorably and Democrats criticizing them as harmful.

  "Conservatives are typically saying it's good. Democrats are typically saying it's bad." [03:41]

• Market Impact: The tariffs have led to significant market turbulence, although there's debate over whether this is a genuine economic reaction or driven by speculative actions against Trump.

  "The market is taking a hit, but we have no idea why." [03:35]

---

3. Impact on the Stock Market

The conversation shifts to the stock market's reaction to Trump's tariffs, with co-hosts Elad Eliyahu and Phil Labonte providing their perspectives.

Key Points:

• Short-term Market Decline: The introduction of tariffs has caused a notable drop in stock values, particularly affecting major corporations.

  "Every time Trump makes these moves, the stock market tacks downwards." [04:23]

• Long-term Benefits vs. Short-term Pain: There's an ongoing debate about whether the tariffs will result in long-term economic gains despite short-term market volatility.

  "If it's short term and it results in a long term gain, is it worth it?" [04:22]

• Ownership Concentration: Phil Labonte highlights that stock ownership is highly concentrated among the top 10% of income earners, suggesting that market fluctuations primarily affect a small, wealthy segment of the population.

  "The top 10% of income earners own 87% of corporate equities and mutual funds." [17:49]

• Economic Growth vs. Regulation: Discussions revolve around whether deregulation and tax cuts are necessary to stimulate economic growth, with differing opinions on the role of government intervention.

  "The only way you can manage the debt is by having enough revenue coming in." [76:20]

---

4. Media Manipulation and CNN Accusations

A contentious topic arises regarding accusations that CNN has been manipulating images to portray Trump inaccurately.

Key Points:

• Orange Hue on Trump: Viewers alleged that CNN applied an orange filter to Trump during his speeches, a claim that has gone viral.

  "CNN being accused of making Trump orange through a filter." [00:00]

• Comparison with Other Networks: Tim Pool compares the appearance of Trump on CNN versus Fox News, suggesting intentional manipulation by CNN.

  "When you go to Fox, he does not look orange at all." [30:21]

• Consistency in Media Portrayal: The hosts argue that media outlets, particularly those with a liberal bias, consistently portray Trump in a less favorable light through subtle visual manipulations.

  "This is what they're doing with Trump when they edit his image or when they lie about what he says." [32:19]

• Impact on Public Perception: The manipulation contributes to a distorted public perception of Trump, making it challenging for supporters to counteract negative portrayals.

  "They're making it difficult for those of us in anti-establishment media to actually get the truth to people." [36:34]

---

5. Discussions on Free Speech and Regulation

The episode delves into broader themes of free speech, regulation, and the role of governmental bodies like the FTC.

Key Points:

• Free Speech Absolutism: Tiffany Cianci emphasizes her stance as a free speech absolutist, advocating for the protection of all speech unless it directly causes harm.

  "I'm a free speech absolutist. It is always to be the louder voice, to scream louder, to say more." [60:35]

• Regulatory Challenges: The conversation explores the limitations of current regulatory frameworks, such as the Federal Arbitration Act, which Tiffany argues hampers the ability to hold corporations accountable through class-action lawsuits.

  "We can't have a free market economy because the free market is blind." [93:28]

• Role of the FTC: Debates arise around the effectiveness of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in regulating deceptive practices, with differing views on whether it should be abolished or reformed.

  "People have a monopoly. The White House Correspondents association, they used to have monopoly on coverage." [51:05]

• Impact on Small Businesses: Tiffany discusses how existing regulations and the dominance of large corporations hinder small businesses and entrepreneurship, advocating for reforms that incentivize local reinvestment and fair competition.

  "We need to re-incentivize business development at the small business level." [77:21]

---

6. Antifa and Protest Activity

Elad Eliyahu raises concerns about increasing Antifa-related activities and the government's potential response.

Key Points:

• Rise in Protest Activities: Reports indicate escalating confrontations between Antifa groups and conservative figures, suggesting a resurgence of politically motivated violence.

  "Antifa attacks TP USA tabling event featuring Brandon Tatum at UC Davis." [55:07]

• Government Crackdowns: Discussion on possible government measures to curb such activities, including banning masks at protests to prevent anonymity and escalation.

  "Trump would have the ability to ban masks at protests." [60:19]

• Legal Implications: The hosts debate the balance between maintaining public safety and upholding free speech rights during protests.

  "But it's my duty to defend it." [62:34]

---

7. Conclusion and Final Remarks

As the discussion winds down, the hosts engage with audience comments, touch upon lighter topics like Pokémon, and reiterate promotional segments for their platforms.

Key Points:

• Audience Engagement: The episode concludes with interactions from the chat, blending serious discussions with humorous exchanges about popular culture.

  "I'm a Pokemon." [107:56]

• Future Projections: Tim Pool hints at upcoming segments and encourages listeners to join their Discord server and Rumble Premium for more in-depth, uncensored discussions.

  "Don't forget the uncensored call-in show will be coming up at 10 PM." [03:17]

---

Notable Quotes

• Tim Pool on Tariffs' Market Impact:

  "No one is safe from President Trump's new tariffs. Not even penguins." [43:00]

• Tiffany Cianci on Small Businesses and Private Equity:

  "If those are already on that conveyor belt to eventual failure, this is going to expedite that for some of them." [10:22]

• Phil Labonte on Stock Market Correction:

  "There's been a need for a correction for a while. We've had interest rates at zero from 2008 until 2017." [08:53]

• Elad Eliyahu on Free Market and Regulation:

  "The FTC could lay their hands off a bit and focus on drugs more." [95:10]

• Tiffany Cianci on Arbitration Courts:

  "These courtrooms have been so bastardized to not allow Americans to see the bad behavior of corporations without their knowledge." [93:20]

---

Conclusion

This episode of Timcast IRL offers a multifaceted exploration of Donald Trump's tariff policies and their extensive ripple effects across global markets, small businesses, and political landscapes. Through dynamic discussions with Tiffany Cianci and insights from co-hosts Elad Eliyahu and Phil Labonte, the show navigates the complexities of economic strategies, media influence, and the enduring debate over regulation and free speech in modern America.

---

For more detailed discussions and to stay updated with future episodes, listeners are encouraged to join the Timcast Discord server and subscribe to their Rumble Premium channel.

Transcript

[Tim Pool]

Cha cha cha cha. Chumba looking for excitement. Chumba Casino is here. Play anytime, Play anywhere. Play on the train. Play at the store. Play at home. Play when you're bored. Play today for your chance to win and get daily bonuses when you log in. So what are you waiting for? Don't delay. Chumba Casino is free to play. Experience social gameplay like never before. Go to Chumba Casino right now to play hundreds of games, including online slots, bingo, Slingo and more. Live the chumba [e-mail] no purchase necessary. VGW Group void where prohibited by law 21 terms and conditions apply. The race is on as the global markets are in turmoil and there's chaos internationally. We already have the report from the Financial Times that countries are racing to offer us concessions before the tariffs hit. Indeed. Well, we'll see how this plays out. No one is sure, but on tribal lines, it's pretty obvious. Conservatives are typically saying it's good. Democrats are typically saying it's bad. The market is taking a hit, but we have no idea why. Some are saying that it's a short, that people are selling off because they're trying to sabotage Trump or profit off of what they think is will be his failures. Not that it's actually a genuine reaction to trade, but again, others are saying, yo, when you mess up trade like this, your market is going to sell off. So we will see. That's pretty interesting. Now in this story, of course, CNN being accused of making Trump orange through a filter. Maybe it was the TV screens, we don't know. But we'll, we'll show this one. This has gone pretty viral. And then of course, CNN once again lying about Donald Trump claiming he's putting tariffs on penguins when in fact he put a tariff on fisheries. Yeah, because the population of an island was zero, but people work there. They claimed he was putting a tax on penguins because they lie. We're gonna talk about that. Plus, we got news. The tick tock ban is looming. Will there be an extension? We will find out. Before we get started, my friends, head over to cast brew.com and buy some Cast Brew coffee. It's. It's the best coffee. Everyone agrees. At least that's what I've been told. Make sure you pick up some Appalachian nights. Maybe you like some rise with Roberto Jr. Or stand your grounds. And if you dive in, you can find out. We got misty mountains. We got focus with Mr. Bocus. He's our cat. Rest in peace. And of course, Ian's graphene dream sells like crazy for Whatever reason, don't forget, join the Discord server. Don't just be a passive observer, that is be an active participant. We are launching the Culture War Live, which is our Friday morning podcast starting May 3rd where you as members of our Discord will be able to come to the table and actually debate live on camera on the show with our various guests. So if you want to get involved, join that discord [e-mail] and don't forget that uncensored call in show will be coming up at 10pm but you got to be a Rumble Premium member so use promo code [e-mail] Timcast IRL if you'd like to watch that show, don't forget to smash that like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Joining us tonight to talk about this and so much more is Tiffany Cianci.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Thanks for having me back.

[Tim Pool]

Did I pronounce it right?

[Tiffany Cianci]

You did. Okay, great on the first try too.

[Tim Pool]

Right. Who are you? What do you do?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I am a small business advocate. Primarily I do a ton of advocacy for small businesses. I talk about the ways that we can support small businesses, how we can save them from private equity erosion and destruction. And I do that in Capitol Hill and on Tick Tock and X and in every place I'm able to go and spread the word.

[Tim Pool]

Right on. We had you on. Was it like last week? Was it? Or was it two weeks ago? Yeah, and it was. We had a guest who just didn't show up and you rushed out the door trying to make it here in time. But you were telling us about the, the pending financial collapse from all these businesses that are going under now. Hooters apparently is filing bankruptcy and you predicted it.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

So this will be really interesting. We'll dive back into that after we get through all the other news, of course, but should be fun. Thanks for joining us.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm so happy to be back. Absolutely great time.

[Tim Pool]

It was great. White House correspondent a Lot Eliyahu has joined us.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Good evening, everybody. I am A Lot Eliyahu, your White House correspondent. Phil, how's it going?

[Phil Labonte]

Hello, everybody. My name is Phil Labonte. I'm the lead singer of the heavy metal band all that Remains. I'm an anti communist and counter revolutionary. Let's get to it.

[Tim Pool]

Here's the news, ladies and gentlemen. We're starting off with the big bang from the Financial Times. Donald Trump triggers race to offer U.S. concessions before tariffs hit nations prepare to offer washing. Prepare offers to Washington including weapons deals, dropping their own tariffs and moves against China when Does Trump get to say I told you so? Should he do that now or should he wait until the deals are finalized? Because I got to say all day it was nothing but finance people, Democrats, liberals, bashing their faces on the table, screaming that this was the apocalypse and Trump was burning everything down. And now the Financial Times, not a liberal paper, not, it's, they're, they're, the Financial Times are saying outright these countries are coming out and saying we're going to offer you some deals. They mentioned the EU. Brussels has offered to drop car tariffs 10% to Washington levels of 2.5%. Said officials brief and talk talks. It could also increase energy purchases. They go say they say few of these countries have moved to retaliate an attempt to reduce its 20 tariff. The EU instead is prepared to cut the $235 billion trade surplus it racked up in 2024 by buying more U.S. goods and lowering some tariffs. Trump's swing, swinging global tariffs, which sent markets sharply downwards, were introduced despite charm offenses by countries from Japan to Israel seeking to preempt the charges with moves designed to mollify the president. So we're hearing Israel's dropping their tariffs. Japan is saying they're going to buy more. It seems like Trump's move just, just, just wins. I don't know, I mean the market is down and I think it would be silly. You know, I, we've got Judge Jeanine on the 5 saying I don't care about my 401k, something that affect and I'm just going to say, look, there are people who deeply care about their 401ks, okay? They rely on that. And so Trump making these moves is risky because people are going to get negatively impacted by this. But if it's short term and it results in a long term gain, is it worth it?

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think yes. I definitely think yes. I think this is really nice again, because if the goal of the tariffs was to onshore so called onshore manufacturing, again, I don't think it was going to achieve that goal. But if this was an art of the deal style maneuver to create some leverage to be able to cancel out some of these trade surpluses some of these countries have with us, or to try to make some concessions on trying to deal with China, this is all in our favor. We've had bad trade deals with these countries for some time. We've been getting the short end of the stick and this is what it took to kind of bring everything back together. Markets hate uncertainty and they are definitely, it's very Trump is obviously injects a lot of uncertainty into the market. So we're going to see some turbulence moving forward. But I think the ultimate gain here that we're seeing more than justifies that. I think it's interesting too, the people who are complaining the most about the market would otherwise again talk about hating business people and hating big business. So I just think it's an interesting the group of people are complaining about this the most.

[Phil Labonte]

I think that, I think if you're dealing with political opponents or partisans, the criticism of the tariffs is baked in. I don't think it matters. If you're a person that's been critical of Donald Trump for everything, you're going to be critical of Donald Trump for this, of course. So to take partisans opinions on it, I think is you take it with a grain of salt because they're going to find a negative outlook. As far as, as far as the stock market goes, I think I've said this a couple times, but there's been a need for a, a correction for a while. We've had, you know, you had interest rates at zero from 2008 until 2017. People were taking that money. People were taking loans out and they were dumping that money into the stock market. They're taking loans for zero, you know, zero percent interest or really, really, really low percent interest. And so that's artificially inflated a bubble in the stock market that does exist. And this correction is actually healthy and necessary now before people get all worked up about that. Poor people. And the people that are working class, they likely don't own a lot of stocks. It does matter to people that are on fixed incomes, people that are going into retirement. Now I understand that's true. But the people that are, the people that are getting hurt are people that do have assets, people that have money in the stock market. If you're talking about the working class, you're talking about poor people. They mostly do not have assets. So this actually doesn't affect them the same way that it does affect rich people.

[Tim Pool]

So maybe Trump is just like, I don't really care about those people.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, look, if the stock market needs a correction, there's a bubble. That's not, that's not some kind of thing that's debated. And he talked to, talk to most of the economists and most of the people that, that are in financials and they're aware of that. Go ahead. If you had something to add, please.

[Tiffany Cianci]

From a working class or populist perspective. My, my whole thing is small business advocacy. There's no question some small businesses are going to be hurt by this. There's no question that it will be difficult for them. However. However, when you look at what's going on with Small Business America and how they're being gobbled up by private equity, they have one move that the pirate equity really engages in where they, like, buy and then they slash and then they pay themselves and then they dump it. They do that largely by off sourcing like labor overseas and buying cheap goods from overseas. So when it comes to the companies that are already on the track to eventual bankruptcy, nothing that's acquired by private equity is ever coming back to the private marketplace unless it goes through an ipo. And even then, it's almost impossible. So if those are already on that, on that conveyor belt to eventual failure, this is going to expedite that for some of them. But it's going to give small businesses that do business with other small businesses and farms and American manufacturing a leg up. So in that regard, I actually think from a populist perspective, it's going to hurt the Finance Bros more than it's going to hurt the small businesses. And I think that there's, there's a claim to be made there that that's what our small businesses need. Because I don't see a future for the younger generations of America right now like the Finance Bros. But I do see a future for them in entrepreneurship.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

I also think that probably a lot of Gen Z are looking at this and laughing. I remember the 2008 Great Recession. I was broke as a joke, and I thought it was funny, you know, because, you know, I went to apply for a job as a dishwasher at a small diner because I was like, I need money. I found it on Craigslist. And there was a guy standing in front of me in line wearing a suit with a briefcase and like, there's like a counter. And I, I was walking up to, like, ask him about the job, and this guy hands a resume and I can hear him say, like, I'm looking for work and I hear that you have a dishwasher position. And I just laughed and I turned around and walked out. And I was like, I mean, how old was I? 20, 22 or whatever? 22 years old. So there's no, I was, I was explaining everybody like, okay, here's the floor, right? Here's me, here's everybody else. Yeah, I can't go anywhere. I can't go down more. So right now, with all the moves that Trump is making, he's very popular among Gen Z. I kind of feel like Gen Z is just shrugging and laughing and being like, oh yeah, my retirement account. I'm so concerned about something.

[Phil Labonte]

I will never that point. I was listening to the all in podcast a couple of weeks ago and the guy Chamath was, was making that, that exact point. There has to be a correction in the market. And the, the people that tend to vote for Trump tend being the people that are populist, you know, geared toward populism. Like they're not the finance pros generally. They're not the wealthy people, they're the people that don't have assets. And this actually does give them a chance to get into the market and get some deals on things if they want. Look, I'm not saying that everyone should be in the market. That's not the argument that I'm making. But the point is this doesn't hurt the average person that doesn't own assets. And most of Gen Z and probably a significant portion of millennials don't own assets.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So I think if you want some insight to the thinking of the Trump administration here. Yesterday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bennett, not Bessant, brushed off stock market losses following the tariff announcement, saying, that's a MAG7 problem, not a MAGA problem. When he says MAG7, he's referring to the Magnificent 7 stocks in the stock market that are very overvalued. So he's saying that it's a, it's a problem for them, not for maga. So I don't think they mind seeing some crash in some of these Apple, Amazon, Tesla stocks if it means they are going to have leverage to negotiate with other countries. And I think we should be thanking Donald Trump for an opportunity to buy in. If, you know, the stats show that most people don't have any money invested within the next month or so, maybe you should be looking to invest some thanks to Trump. He's giving you a good entry point. Yeah.

[Phil Labonte]

And there's never been more opportunity or there's never been more simple ways for the average person to actually get into the stock market. Whether there's all kinds of apps you can get to get pieces of, of stock. So go ahead, please.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It's foolish for us to suggest, though, that the working class and the younger generation are not going to suffer under this while it's being worked through. It's absolutely like insane for us to think that that's not a reality, that they're going to have to suffer. And I want to be really honest, like for the, for the generation that's like 30 and under, they've suffered a lot like and they're leveraged to the hilt and they don't have a lot more room to give. So we do need to recog endured, you know.08 and they've endured 2020 and they've endured endless debt for jobs that are never going to come, that are never going to pay back their school loans. Right. There's a lot that's working against them. We have to understand that. And we also need to find ways to give them mechanisms back for prosperity because they don't have them right now.

[Phil Labonte]

If that's, if that's the case and they are leveraged the way you say isn't the best thing to do to get the interest, get interest rates down, get inflation under control and lower interest rates. Because if the, if they, if they're leveraged they've got a lot of debt. That interest rate is killing them.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean getting the interest rates down might make their sixteen hundred dollar a month student loan payment fourteen hundred dollars a month but it's not going to change the fact they're never going to get a job that's actually going to pay back the education that what it costs them that we told them would pay them back over time. Like I'm lucky I came in two years early on that side of the coin. I got a house just in time. I, my, my husband got a federal job that paid off his law school loans. Right. After 10 years.

[Elad Eliyahu]

What interest rate did you get that house at? I feel like that's the money you.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Really want to know.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I mean so I didn't get it great.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The issue got oh and then I refinanced at two and a quarter.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, that's incredibly good.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah. That's the thing that I think that's holding back younger people nowadays. I think the best rate you could get is something like 7%. I mean 200.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The price of a house never moves.

[Phil Labonte]

You're, that's your, your, that's. They don't have the money to put down payment on. So it's never, it's not just the interest rates they don't have. There's no money grand to put a down payment on a 200.

[Tim Pool]

It's a viral video from Boy Meets World where the main character is eighty thousand. The eighty thousand dollar house and how it's like we're gonna have to work for six months to get that down payment or something like that.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to this next story from the Seattle Times. Check it out. Trump tariffs wipe out $2.5 trillion from US stock market. And I gotta say, ladies and gentlemen, this year to date, I'm down 20%. I'm down 20. And you know what? I don't care. And you know why Trump don't care and why I don't care about any of these stocks? Like, I don't want to see the companies harmed. I get it. But I ain't crying about it. Let me, let me give you some stats. So I, I asked my good friend chatgpt how many people in this country have a 401, 401k. 34 of Americans have a 401k. So when Trump makes these moves, 34 of people are impacted. Okay? I don't want to see anybody lose money. You know, bad policy is bad policy, but this ain't the majority. This is only a third of the country. So the majority of the country who don't have these accounts are not feeling this pain. It gets better. I went on to ask Our good friend ChatGPT what percent of a stock portfolio. It tries giving me these fake answers, so I have to. So the first time I asked it, what percent percent of Americans have 401ks, it says 70% of private sector employees have access to 401k style plans. I said, whoa, whoa, whoa, that is not what I asked you. I said, oh, you're right, it's 34%. When I said, what percent of a stock portfolio says actually through a variety of different vehicles. No, no, no, no, I said, that's not what I asked you. It said, okay, 58 of Americans have a stock portfolio. Here's where it gets better. Despite broad participation, the top 10% of income earners own 87 of corporate equities and mutual funds. So when you see Apple, Amazon, Nvidia, Microsoft, Meta Alphabet, Tesla, Broadcast, Broadcom, Walmart, JP Morgan dropping, and the media is going, oh, woe is me. Democrats, quick, we're in pain. Donald Trump's tariff plans. What they're really saying is, quick, wealthy people, we're upset. So I'm wondering if Donald Trump, when he makes these moves and they say in the media, oh, the stocks are tanking and people's retirements and all that stuff, I wonder if Donald Trump is actually just thinking, I got to be honest, I don't care about these people. They're rich. The person who has the top 10% of this country, are they really going to be hurt by a, by this right now? They, they probably didn't even know what the cost of, of eggs was, to be completely honest. Now I got, I got to tell you guys, I don't know and I haven't known for a long time how much a dozen eggs costs because I have my own chickens. And you too can have your own chickens and never worry about those costs again. But the reality is for the top 10% of this country, they don't know what milk costs, they don't know what bread costs, they don't care about this stuff. It's the working class Americans who are going to benefit from this first and foremost and they're not going to cry about someone's portfolio dropping.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think this, all this graph also doesn't do a good job of showing how overvalued obviously the stock market is. So like if you pulled up Apple stock for the past five years, it's obviously very overdue for a correction.

[Phil Labonte]

The Magnificent Seven are holding up the stock market.

[Elad Eliyahu]

And like also if you. I'm sorry, go ahead.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Apple has not innovated or invented anything substantial. Substantial in 25 frickin years.

[Tim Pool]

Well, I gotta, I gotta pause you there. They don't, they've not invented anything substantial. We can. Sentence cut off. Apple is famous for taking existing things and marketing it better.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, but they haven't even met.

[Tim Pool]

He's a genius, you know, he knows how to market. My favorite thing was how he took Unix, slapped his brand on it and sold it for a crapload of money when it was a free software to begin with. But hey, bravo to Apple, right?

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's those curvy edges.

[Tim Pool]

That, those curvy edges and, and the weight. They like it feeling heavy.

[Elad Eliyahu]

There's something about how they feel.

[Tim Pool]

But he gets it, he gets it. Now take a look at this. Ladies and gentlemen, this may shock you. I have for you the Dow, Dow Jones Industrial Average. And as you can see over the past five years, where's the market drop off? No, no, I, I know, I get it. Looking over the past five years and seeing that in five years the market is up 92.59%? Doesn't get it what's happening today. But my point is, look at every time the market drops. We're here. Is there any strong difference from any time we've seen a big market drop? Here you go in 20, 22 from 33 down to 28. Okay, today we saw 44 down to 40.5. Look, I gotta be honest, when you, when you zoom in on today, they go, oh no, the market's tanking. When you look at it over the past five years, you're like, can't really see a strong difference between today and yesterday.

[Elad Eliyahu]

This is the Dow Jones. If you look at any of the Mag 7 stocks, the difference is even more prominent. It's even more ridiculous. Like Amazon or even Tesla or I think even Microsoft. All of these stocks, Nvidia is the most infamous one because they have the most outrageous pe.

[Tim Pool]

It is a big drop today, don't get me wrong. 1679 for the day, nearly 4% is big. Yeah, very big. In five days, 4% in one month, 6% six months, 3% year to date, minus 4 in one year it's actually up 3.63. So that's obviously to the Biden administration. But the point is when you look at the five years, it's like there's a, there's a ton of moments where the stocks dropped. It's, it's, it's ebbs and flows. So the question now is going to be, will Trump's tariffs result in other countries changing their policies, investing in America and making trade better for us? And it looks like the answer is it's already started.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It would be very smart of them. I suspect within the next month or two we'll see most of these tariffs drop. Except for the big countries like China. I think there's going to be issues with down the line.

[Tim Pool]

I'll tell you the only thing I care about right now. There's, there's two groups of people in this country that I care about. Working class Americans who are raising children and Gen Z. Gen Z needs to be able to establish families, otherwise we cease to exist. The middle class working families of various ages, from Gen Z to elder millennial, even younger Gen X need money for their children. I don't care about boomers. Sorry, boomers. I don't care about you. I don't care about silent generation and I don't care about the wealthy. I don't even care about like the, the middle upper class. If you have money and you have food and you can't eat, we need to make sure that the people who are struggling and suffering are able to, to work these things through and make it. Now the problem is you've got people who can't afford to feed their kids and you've got Gen Z. That feels like right now there is no path forward. Yeah. So when we look at these stocks, and I'll give you this, the income of the top 10% of this country is, let's see, as of 2024, you need to make $150,000 per year to be considered a top 10% earner in the United States. How many Gen Z are anywhere near that number? How many of. At 22 years old, you're supposed to have a kid and be married. That was the average for, for a millennia. And in this, this period we're at Boomers hold a disproportionate amount of wealth and Gen Z holds a disproportionate amount less.

[Tiffany Cianci]

And of debt. They own a disproportionate amount of debt.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They will be saddled with the debt that we continue, our boomers continue to.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You guys asked the question, are tariffs going for the working class of this country? It's going to take a lot more like let's say tariffs work and like I think that we will see a lot of reciprocal relief. Okay. I think, and I'll say again what I said earlier, which I think it's insane that we're upset about applying a 10% tariff to Canada when Canada is putting a 269% tariff on the goods that we're sending there. We can't send butter to Canada without a 269% tariff. Why would we not reciprocate in some way? I don't know if it should be blanket, but I do think we're going to see some reciprocal relief. But unless we see a serious market correction, and that's going to take pain, a serious market correction, Gen Z and these younger millennials will never own a home.

[Tim Pool]

Let's, let's, let's be real.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Because it's not just debt, it's also the cost.

[Tim Pool]

When, when you see these Democrats screaming the stocks are dropping, do you know what investors are actually doing right now?

[Phil Labonte]

Buying stocks.

[Tim Pool]

That's right. Bargain bin. Get in while you can. Because over the past five years, after 100 up 100%. Oh great. Now's your chance to get back in. Because you know these tariffs are going to be temporary or at the very least the ramifications we say today will be temporary. And even if the tariffs stick, something is going to change.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Stocks go up, stocks go up, stocks go down. I think the real, the big question here is if these are long term tariffs or not. If we see these tariffs come off and other countries decide to come to the table, then this will be a good move in my opinion. If we have these tariffs on tacked on for years, I think it'll just slow down the global economy and hurt both sides. I think free trade's a good thing in most cases. So I think that's what we have yet to see. I suspect he'll take them all off, but if he doesn't, then we're going to start a trade war with most of our trading partners. If we see. Because if we see like a 10% tariff on cars, for example, people can't afford cars already here. Buy American, even American cars.

[Tiffany Cianci]

American cars have gotten really exploitative, though. Look at what Stellantis has done. Stellantis has literally driven up all of their prices, cut all of their quality, hurt their union members, and have literally like injured their customers by refusing to do recalls on deadly issues with their vehicles. Like Stellantis is a nightmare right now.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Car market is trash and people can't afford cars to begin with, not to mention their insurance and gas. And now we're going to make them is obviously, I could see the issues here. And when you really start hitting consumers is the issue. And also, allegedly there are real problems with how they formulated these numbers. I'm not an economist, but there's actually not.

[Tim Pool]

I actually don't think so. The, the, the, the White House administration actually released a statement on how they calculated the number. The number actually says currency manipulation, trade barriers. And I think this is tariffs. Let me make sure. Yeah, yeah. Tariffs charged to the US including currency manipulation and trade barriers. They basically took the trade deficit divided by the surplus or something like that. What they're basically saying is this is the percentage by which we are giving them a benefit, so we're cutting that in half and charging them on, on their products coming into us. The idea being they don't buy enough from us, so it's not necessarily a tariff. And the funny thing is there's this great, there's this great analysis. This guy, I think his name was Oren Cass or whatever, think his name. I could be getting your name wrong, buddy. Sorry. And he wrote in February Trump's response to trade imbalance will likely be tariffs. This doesn't mean he's saying they tariff me, I tariff you. But economists, of course, are going to lose their minds over this. It's crazy to me that they're going to make up any reason to say Trump is wrong when the intent is clear. We can buy, we can, we can give them money, but they, they have barriers and blocks on us. So when we try to sell, we try to sell and make money of them, it doesn't work.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That's why I support more the reciprocity tariffs than I do like just blanket tariffs. I think reciprocal tariffs are actually intelligent for a negotiating Perspective.

[Tim Pool]

Look at this tweet's really funny. He said Nike shifted production from China to Vietnam to sidestep tariffs, only to get hit with new, bigger ones. That makes me so happy. So happy. Look at this China, 34% tariff. And then you've got Vietnam 46. Nike stock is down 14.44% today. I'm good with it. I'm happy about it. They, they make their shoes in Vietnam. We need products made in America to support American jobs. We, this idea that we were going to be the capital city of the Hunger Games of the world and that a country could survive with no one being able to do any work or know how to do work. What you end up getting, you want to know what you end up getting? When you have a population that doesn't do any work, you get woke, you get communists, you get dei. No work is a good thing. People need passions, they need driving. They have to build things. So when they took it all away and gave it away, like now we're going to get free, cheap stuff. Nope. So I just absolutely love, love how this played out.

[Tiffany Cianci]

There are a ton of reasons that the working class are being hit from all sides, especially in the younger generations. Okay? It is foolish of us to suggest these tariffs are not going to lead to layoffs in the, in the working class. They are going to lead to pain for the working class. However, there are other issues that are at play. Historically, for every $1 that a product went up based on inflation, 93 cents of that dollar increase went back into the economy, either through reinvestment in higher wages or through new factories or. Or through price relief when there was severe inflation. Right now, $0.06 of every dollar increase in the average product in America is going back into the economy, and all of it's being funneled to the hands of a very few individuals. There has been a massive shift. And last time I was on here, we talked about Dodge vs. Ford. It's a court case, very famous court case that kind of started this spiral, in my opinion, in a lot of ways, Ford was trying to be a good employer. I'm not going to say anything about how good of a company they were based on some of the things they did. They were trying to be a good employer and a good neighbor. They wanted to increase wages for their workers, they wanted to reinvest in new factories, they wanted to lower prices on their cars. Dodge sued them, and they said, by law, you have to serve your shareholders instead of your employees, so you're not allowed to raise their wages. And Dodge won. And it made the precedent that has governed all court cases ever since that says that all corporations now have a duty to their shareholders and never the communities or their employees. And that started the spiral of lack of reinvestment into our economy. And then we continued allowing the tax breaks that come on the back of that. But we could have created a circumstance where we incentivized reinvestment through tax breaks. Instead, we gave blanket tax breaks, even negotiated tax breaks for coming to certain areas versus incentivizing the behavior that would reinvigorate the economy. That's a mistake we've made. And if we don't put those guardrails back on, if we don't fix that, we can't fix the way that things need to go.

[Tim Pool]

I want to jump to this story. We got a tweet from Mario Novel CNN Has Orange Filter on Trump Journalism or Just Manipulation? A social media storm erupted after viewers alleged CNN applied an orange tint to Trump's face during his Liberation Day speech. Critics say it mirrors past accusations that Joe Rogan's skin tone was altered on air to discredit his views on health during COVID While CNN hasn't commented, skeptical viewers see it as a reality editing other than objective news coverage. Another blow to public trust. Let's try this video. Now, the first thing I want to say is some are arguing that this is simply the TV having its settings changed. I disagree and I'll explain why. But here's the video. There's actually no audio, so I played for you. You can see here on cnn, Trump looks pretty orange. When you go to Fox, he does not look orange at all. Now, interesting. The speculation, of course, is that CNN made Trump look orange. Take a look at the reds on the left on the Fox News lower graphic Chiron and the reds on the right on cnn. I don't see that big of a difference. They look pretty comparable.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Now that flag reds are the ones I'm interested in and they look pretty comparable to.

[Tim Pool]

I would actually argue that the flag behind Trump on the left side looks a little more red, but we can't see it more vibrant. But here's the here's the issue. If a filter were to be applied, the reason why I believe it is true they applied a filter. I'll say it one more time. The Chiron for breaking news looks like the same red as the Fox Fox News red. They don't look brighter. I mean, it's a bright orange up here or it's like a reddish, you know, bright, brighter Here, it's brighter here. This is the White House camera feed. CNN wouldn't apply saturation to their own graphics. They would apply the saturation to the White House feed. What that means is the flag might look more vibrant in some areas. The graphics should look the same depending on which color scheme they use, maybe these different ones, but that would result in both in Trump looking like a different color. Considering this is the White House feed, it appears. I don't think this is CNN's camera. It looks like it's sourced from the White House. I'm going to go ahead and say my, My belief, upon observing of the video, is that this is not the TV being manipulated. This is CNN manipulating Trump. And I will also add Joe Rogan. When CNN aired footage of Joe Rogan, he looked gray and sickly.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And when they talked about how he was prescribed Ivermectin, they put a little horse symbol on the screen as they described what it was. These are not honest actors.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, it's my thought, or I could be misremembering, but I thought that CNN had said that they were going to try to move away from this kind of stuff.

[Tim Pool]

You can't stop one producer. But you know what this does. The question then becomes, why? Why do it?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Did you see Joe Rogan's interaction with the CNN journalist that came on his show?

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah.

[Tiffany Cianci]

And it was like. I mean, he was aggressive. Why? Why are you okay with this? Why are you okay with these deceptive practices? I mean, he really went for it.

[Tim Pool]

The question of, for this story is why would they make Trump look orange? When you watch Family Guy and Family Guy satirizes Trump, they made him look bright orange. When you watch snl, when you watch these, these, these parodies on the left, they always make Trump look as orange as they can. They're trying to add grains of sand to the heap that Trump is a clown. He's an unserious person. He's laughable and crazy. But when you watch Trump in reality on Fox News, he does not look that orange. This is not the first time we've seen stories. There have been numerous photos that have been published in the press, written where they have a photo attached to it where Trump has been saturated to look orange. What happens then is a liberal says, he's disgusting. Why does he do this? Why do we have an orange clown for our president? But people who have been to Trump's rallies are like, what are you talking about? So I was asked, how do you know it's not Fox News? Making Trump look better. And I said, because I've met Trump in person and he's not orange.

[Phil Labonte]

Oh, that's fair enough.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'll be honest. The skeptic or the cynic in me feels like this kind of stuff is just dropped into the newsfeed intentionally to keep us from paying attention to real issues and to keep us arguing about stuff that is super irrelevant.

[Tim Pool]

Maybe. I, I can't. I. I don't believe that CNN called up Fox News and said, hey, we're going to.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, no, no, no, I get it.

[Tim Pool]

But, but. But it's possible that, you know, CNN was like, we'll get clicks, we'll get a lot of attention from.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, that I think is more likely.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, that, that. Honestly, that. Yeah, I, I would say that that's. That might be a motivation otherwise, I mean, just to discredit him. That they have. Sure, they. They could. They have an army of people that get on there and. And, you know, say orange man bad every night and. And they have for the past, you know, 10 years or whatever. So I find it. I find it uncompelling or redundant, I guess.

[Tim Pool]

I suppose they're trying to create a perception of Trump among the left, and they've succeeded in doing it.

[Phil Labonte]

You think they're just trying to. To feed their red meat to their base?

[Tim Pool]

No, I think they're trying to make sure the bureaucratic state, the administrative state, wants to make sure that people can't be exposed to reality. Like, how is it that Daniel Negrano, famous poker player, came on the show. He told us a great story, the Very Fine People Hoax. Trump said, Nazis were very fine people. He said, I saw the video of it. And his buddy, another poker pro, was like, no, no, watch this video. And he goes, I've already seen the videos. No, watch this one. So what happens is, when you see CNN show you the video, the next time someone comes to you and says, have you seen the video? Your response is, yes, I've seen it. Yeah, I've seen it. And then the conservative is like, so then, you know, he didn't say that. Like, what do you mean? I've seen it. He did say it. And it creates this confusion for Negrano. He said the dude slid him his phone. He said, okay, fine, I'll watch. And then he saw the full video. Yeah, it's like what Michael Malice was talking about the other day, where he said there was. I can't remember who the guy was, but he made a comment about slavery, and he had said something about I'm not going to actually say the quote, but the quote was, he said slavery wasn't bad because of this, it was bad because of that. And then what I think was the New York Times, he mentioned. Yeah, I don't know. Yeah, he said they took only his quote where he said slavery wasn't bad because of this. And so they cut out what he actually said to make it sound like he was pro slavery. This is what the corporate press does all the time. And if somebody read that quote and their friend went to him and said, do you see what so and so said about. I read it, I read it in the Times, I know exactly what he said. They'll go, really? And you're mad at him for it. But yes, this is what they're doing with Trump when they, when they edit his image or when they lie about what he says, they're making it difficult for those of us in anti establishment media, those who support Trump, to actually get the truth to people. So I'll say this to the people who are like, I just can't convince my liberal aunt, like, no matter what. It's because in her mind she already saw the video. There's a 10 second video where Trump says they were very fine people on both sides and that's all she saw. And then you have the 30 second video where he says, and I'm not talking about the neo Nazis, the white nationalists, they should be condemned totally. But every time you say, aunt, Aunt Ruth watch the video, she goes, I've already seen it. I've already seen it. I don't need to watch it.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, the, the fact that, I mean that the very fine people hoaxes is still alive and well and it's actually kind of remarkable that it has that kind of stuff.

[Tim Pool]

Biden. Biden ran on it. Yeah, that's amazing.

[Phil Labonte]

Biden ran on. And I mean, there's. Kamala Harris was saying, oh, hey, he said there were very fine people. Barack Obama said the same thing. And this was in the, in the campaign just this past fall, you know, like they were still making those remarks.

[Tim Pool]

Well, that was actually, I believe Negrano mentioned that as well, that once he actually figured out that the video he had seen was fake or was out of context and he watched the full video, then he ends up seeing Obama lie.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And he's like, wait a minute, again, I referenced. He knows.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, yeah, I'd reference the, the all in podcast. Chamath. I forget his last name. I can't pronounce it, but Chamath said The exact same thing. He had this one. He had this notion that Donald Trump had said all these bad things. And then someone got him to watch it might have been David Sacks, got him to watch the. The. The whole thing. And he was like, I have to reevaluate everything that I know about this guy now because this was act. This is what I would. I would have sworn up and down. I believed totally that that is what he said. Because I saw the. The Ed. The edited video and then when I saw the actual whole video, it may. It'll. It. It makes me re. Evaluate everything that I thought I believed.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You know, I had Robert F. Kennedy Jr. On my live TikTok town hall show four times. And one of the things people wanted me to ask about regularly were the jabs, right? Not. Not the COVID ones. But just in general. A lot of people saw a clip from a podcast he did where they asked him about whether or not he thought there was anything such thing as a safe. I'm just going to do this so that there's no censorship over here. Safe vaccines. But he started to say, I don't believe there's any such thing as a safe vaccine without double blind testing and the strict standard scrutinization of science that we do on all pharmaceuticals. And that podcast cut it down to I don't believe there's any such thing as a safe vaccine. He always quoted on that quote more than 10,000 times over the course of his entire. And over and over again. People would get mad at me that I had him on my cast. First of all, you need to have him on. You can't ask the question if you don't have somebody in front of you. I'll talk to anybody. I don't care how much I disagree with him. But that one quote. I saw the full version and I saw that and every news outlet in America took that one half a clip without the rest of it and ran.

[Tim Pool]

Factual but not truthful. But you know what? I love this. I want to create some of those moments. I hate Elad when he brings pineapple pizza. Come on. A lot. You know I love you, man, but you got to bring pepperoni so aggressively. I refuse to eat pizza that has broccoli on it. I just. I don't. Why would anyone do that? Let's just make as many of those quotes as we can and give the press an opportunity to say Tim hates a lot. Tim refuses to eat pizza. I think ribs are awful when they're soaked in vinegar.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Don't go to North Carolina, what's the.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Have you heard this RFK Jr. Alleged blackmail stuff? I don't so much with that, do you think? I don't want to dive into a whole thing, but just since you mentioned RFK Jr. I don't know. Do you believe there's something funky going on there and based on something more than just conjecture? Because, I mean, I know there's been a lot of just conjecture about, I don't know, everything. You know, we're just talking about the Fine People hoax a moment ago. Everything on the Internet is just people throwing one another and seeing what's.

[Tim Pool]

I, I don't. I don't know anything. Anything to that.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Okay, I'm gonna say that I, I am somebody that believes that there are institutions that have lots of blackmail on almost everybody that we elect. I'm just.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's like so unprovable and it's so. It's such like an easy thing to. I mean, I. Yeah. I don't know. Could you, like. We can't ever prove that. So there's no way for anybody to say, I don't know, is there blackmail on Tim Pool? And how do you know so, I.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Mean, I think Tim wouldn't care what anybody thought.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, a lot. You're blackmailing me.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, that's why you said you hated me.

[Tim Pool]

That's why he's on the show. I have no choice.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, I'm going to release that handler.

[Tim Pool]

He's going to release those photos of me eating vinegar ribs and pineapple pizza.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, I, I think that there are handlers. I'm. I'm actually a deep state, a deep state skeptic. I do know that Ian was down in Nashville, I think, today, filming with Candace Owens on this issue. Yeah, I haven't gotten a listen to it yet, Tim.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So this is the funny part. So although you're fairly certain that, like, there's nothing going on with RFK Jr. Right? With that. Oh, you don't you think he's being blackmailed?

[Tim Pool]

No. You said, I'm fairly certain.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, it's just because we do hear so much of this conjecture, and I think there's just. It's interesting how so people are so certain that there is blackmail on him.

[Tim Pool]

Again, I don't know if there is or isn't. That's why it's a moot point when people go online and say, oh, I bet there's something slice, like, okay, show me some evidence and we'll talk about it.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, well, I think that's the funny part that There are some people who, again, think.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, I got to be honest, when I was trying to buy the Daily.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That was the craziest thing that you would. That people thought you'd have enough money to buy the Daily Wire.

[Tim Pool]

I mean. Yeah, my dad owns an emerald mine in South Africa.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Did you know that I've been an employee here for a while, and it's just such a crazy. I don't. I don't know much about.

[Tim Pool]

You've never been an employee.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Employee, but a contractor here for some time. And it was just such a crazy thing to even fathom about my dad's emerald.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Mind if you read any of the transcripts of testimony from the cases that were actually brought about, Epstein, Weinstein, or what's starting to come out with the Diddy stuff, I believe there's a lot of people that have blackmail on a lot of people. I'm just gonna say that I've read a lot of the transcripts of the victims, and there.

[Tim Pool]

There's repeated sounds like somebody with some blackmail on them. Well, look, look. I mean, no, no.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They're testifying that they were abused. People that were part of tapes that were being made for blackmail. There's a lot of testimony.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Are you saying that about RFK Jr. Specifically or just a lot of people?

[Tiffany Cianci]

No, that. That there is specific testimony about specific members, even of Congress where they've talked about congressional members that were brought into the room and forced to do things, and they were part of the victims in that circumstance. I've. I've heard those tapes. I've listened to that testimony. I've read those transcripts. I'm not going to say I. I haven't seen it, so I can't say that. But there. There's been consistent testimony across several victims that makes you think that there might be something to it for me?

[Tim Pool]

Well, I don't think it's fair to call it inflation. I mean, a lot just facilitates my Mossad payments so that I can toe the line.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Everybody needs their handler nowadays. Yeah, we need a Rangold Massie backup. That's. That's why he was the one guy who voted no.

[Tiffany Cianci]

In other news, I'm really excited that hopefully Thomas Massie is coming on my TikTok Town hall in the next couple weeks.

[Tim Pool]

Let's jump to this next story from Mediaite. Quote, we are not kidding. CNN's Dana Bash roasts Trump for slapping tariffs on an Arctic island inhabited solely by penguins. Let me play this video for you. There you go. It's always crashing. Listen to this. No one is safe from President Trump's new tariffs. Not even penguins. A remote island near Antarctica that is home to mainly penguins, no humans, Is now subject to a 10% American tariff. This is not a joke. We are not kidding. These penguins who do not trade goods.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Or services with the United States.

[Tim Pool]

States, as far as we know, are on the receiving end of a new tax. My panel is back. Let's just get some of the headlines up about that. That's a non tariff trade barrier. Okay, well, that's true. I mean it's not going to be.

[Phil Labonte]

Our currency manipulators par excellence.

[Tim Pool]

I'm going to say it right now. You are cognitively deficient if you believe anything they're saying. At least NEWSWEEK is willing to break it down for us. The islands were included because they are Australian territory, citing a White House official. And they also mention the tariffs are part of a new plan. Blah, blah, blah. Well, here's the headline. Donald Trump. Donald Trump puts tariffs on islands inhabited only by penguins. I don't like the headline. However, when they go in to the story, they actually point out, guess what? There are fisheries. World bank data shows that in 2022 the U. S imported $1.4 million worth of goods from Heard island and McDonald Islands, mostly classified as machinery and electrical products, despite the fact the island has no buildings or people. However, it does have a fishery. It is unclear what the imported products were. In the previous five years, imports ranged from 15,000 to $325,000. So let's start with the. Perhaps the people at CNN are just developmentally disabled and they're like, there's no people there. The. They're terrifying penguins. Or perhaps they're intentionally lying to you. So you think Trump is a buffoon, but in reality, the Trump administration said, we don't care where you're selling the products from. These are islands and territories that have transferred products and machines to the United States. You get a tariff too. This episode is brought to you by Selectquote. Life insurance can have a huge impact on our family's future with select quote getting covered with the right policy for you is simple and affordable. Selectquote's licensed insurance agents will tailor your experience to find a life insurance policy for your needs in as little as 15 minutes. And selectquote partners with carriers that provide policies for many conditions. Selectquote they shop, you save. Go to selectquote.com Spotify Pod today to get started.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, I don't know, I don't know what the situation is about. The, the terrorists of the, the penguins of the penguin island. I only heard the, the, the, I guess the, the headlines or whatever. But if it's about fisheries, then I don't, I don't see why CNN's lying. Well, no, I mean, well, we know.

[Tim Pool]

And laughing and they literally said, we are not joking. Trump is tariffing an island inhabited by penguins. And it's like, so the fisheries off the coast, it's Australian territory and people work there.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm going to. What is, what I said earlier, which is that there is plenty of substantive stuff they could be talking about to educate the American population about tariffs. This is a hyperbolic, inflated headline that is designed to create division and distract from actual topics that are relevant to the working class of America. They could talk about substantive tariff issues if they wanted to. They're just seeking clicks and, and that's what this is. And I, I think it's silly.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, of course it's silly, but I think that, I mean, I feel like it's, it's just more of the same, you know, it's more of the same just slander of, of the administration.

[Tim Pool]

I can't, I can't believe we're 10 years in and they're still doing it. It's just remarkable to me. The man won the popular vote and CNN is still playing this game. Their ratings couldn't get lower. In fact, the people who watch CNN are probably forced to do it like Clockwork Orange.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It's not just CNN though, has higher ratings than all of the CNN evening shows, of course, and I'm a nobody.

[Phil Labonte]

But it's not just cnn. It's the entirety of the, the, you know, Democrat establishment. The, they all are doing all of the same things, whether it be, you know, Donald Trump is, you know, is. There's this one Democrat operative that's making the exact same comments about people on the right. She's been making them forever. She said that something ridiculous, something that Jeremy from the quartering said. She said that, oh, that now they're doing full on national socialism, which is just a rehash of their Nazis. I mean, obviously. And it wasn't like Jeremy said something like, you don't need the new iPhone, you don't need the new this. And it was, he was basically talking about being something that was kind of anti consumerism. And it's all the same stuff that's all the same garbage. And I think that it goes back to the fact that the left doesn't have, they're in, they're in disarray. The Democrats in the left, they have no coherent message because they have no leadership and because the people have rejected what they're offering. And Donald Trump has taken the working class from them.

[Tim Pool]

Well, a lot. Now that you're best friends with these people, I mean, what do you have to say for yourself? You're hanging out with them in the White House all day. What do you mean?

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, what's up with that?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, what's going on?

[Tiffany Cianci]

You put in a good word for me. I've been applying for the new media seat every week for the last month.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You might have to drop the RFK slander. So I'm sorry, where were.

[Tiffany Cianci]

She loves my show.

[Tim Pool]

I was asking in all seriousness, you know, you've been. You were in the White House. We were there today.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And so you're actually surrounded by a lot of these people. Would you describe them as smarmy or just evil?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Smarmy. They have a monopoly. The White House Correspondents association, they used to have monopoly on coverage. And you could tell that all of them are on the same page. Whatever the front page news is of the day is what you can expect the whole front row of people to be asking and constantly berating Press Secretary Caroline Levitt with, despite her answering the question, they'll ask her the same thing four different ways and kind of just waste her time, frustrate her until somebody else can get hit in with another topic.

[Tim Pool]

So what's the point of the briefing?

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's so Kaitlan Collins could look like a movie star on cnn. Like, like they're fighting. So they could have one shot of Kaitlan Collins and then it's like she's arguing back and forth, fighting fascism against Caroline Levitt. That's the idea. It's like a TV drama with the way CNN sets up the cameras, too. And then if you watch how they signal it out, it's, I would love.

[Tim Pool]

That job, Press secretary.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's, I'm envious of Caroline Levitt.

[Tim Pool]

There would never be a real answer from that podium while I was working that job. The journalists would be like, they don't deserve Secretary Poole. There's this report that Donald Trump is saying he thinks the market will be fine despite this global sell off. Does the administration plan to accept these, this drop in the market? And then I would be like, okay. And then I drew a picture of a cat. There you go. You can have it. I signed it for you. That's all they get. And I'd also order doordash and I'd be like, you, no, no, don't ask the question. What do you want from Chipotle? Would you like the carnitas or the sofritas? Because you look like a vegan.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, well, you know, the White House is actually addressing this because there, there have been reports that they're planning on tossing out the official White House seating arrangement in the press briefing room. They're already changing up who is on White House grounds to be a journalist and cover it. The White House Correspondents association used to have monopoly on it and now they're actually very shook about what the future of their association looks like. Eugene Daniels is a guy from Politico and the current president of the White House Correspondents association. And it looks like under his watch we're actually going to see this deteriorating them become a completely irrelevant association.

[Tim Pool]

Can Carolyn Levitt choose who gets to sit in front of her? Can she kick somebody out?

[Elad Eliyahu]

The White House Correspondents association has no actual power. That wasn't granted to them by the White House. The White House actually has all of the power. And what they says go. The White House Correspondents association only has power based on tradition from.

[Tim Pool]

Can Caroline Levitt be like you out?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Absolutely. She could. She could make the seating chart. The White House Correspondents association only has a seating chart.

[Tim Pool]

I was press secretary. Allow them to just be a party. And what I would do is, I would want is. Are there any windows to the outside?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yes.

[Tim Pool]

I want them all to look in the window while we have like, like disco lights, music and we'd have like catering and we just be. And they're not welcome in. That's. I am kidding. But I want people to hear their threat when my point is, what I'm describing is how they view it. So when I'm saying we'd lock them out and have a party. This is what the White House Press. The White House Correspondent association had been doing the whole time, only they were allowed in and everyone else had to look through the window and watch them have their party.

[Elad Eliyahu]

There's been reporting and now that if they are stripped of their seating chart, they plan to have a sit in. So they actually plan to take coverage away from independent journalists and different people in the room if they are disallowed. So if they change the seating chart, they want to actually take my ability to cover the White House from me.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Based on apply through the Correspondents association to get your seat.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I did not.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Okay, so I have applied through the White House Correspondents Association. I have tried three times.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Would you meet.

[Tim Pool]

I'm going to give you access.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I Don't think.

[Tiffany Cianci]

No, but you. They said I had to try if I. Because I've been invited to CPAC and I've been invited.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, wait, the White House said you had to.

[Tiffany Cianci]

So when I sent my email to the press office and I wanted to go to the rnc, the dnc, I wanted to go to all of the national conventions this year, I was directed to the White House Correspondents association and they said that you have to apply here. So I did. I applied, I sent in my metrics, I sent in 60 articles that I've given quotes in, I sent in examples of my op EDS that I've had published. And if I didn't have a credential from one of their current publications, I was not allowed to be considered and I could not provide them a credential. That I had a full time job with one of theirs because I was freelancing for all of these places and I had my TikTok show and I was like, listen, I'm getting, you know, 250,000 views. I'm interviewing all these presidential candidates. I'd really like to be. I'll pay my dues. Let's go. And they're like, absolutely not. Get out.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They exist to protect one another and the powerful interests of their kind of. That simple.

[Tim Pool]

Why don't they kick them out?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Because cnn, msnbc, New York Times, they do actually provide coverage of the White House.

[Tim Pool]

It's lies. I mean, look, we just showed they lied about Penguin Island.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Fox defends them because they're.

[Tim Pool]

You get short.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, but because they get access. That's why they defend, they protect each other. Because they all allow each other to get access and keep people like us out.

[Tim Pool]

By the way, it's Peter Doocy, right?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yes.

[Tim Pool]

In the White House because he's got a Z. I always mix their names up. He actually asks challenging questions of Carolyn Levitt sometimes. Sometimes for sure. But I don't understand why they don't just say everybody up.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Because it would be an attack on the freedom of the press, the First Amendment in our country. So then Trump is a fascist and fascism is coming back. That's what they'd say.

[Tim Pool]

They already say it.

[Phil Labonte]

They're going to say that.

[Tim Pool]

They're saying it literally right now.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Hey, you should meet with President Trump and pitch him that. I hear he's meeting with people and Trump.

[Tim Pool]

Let me stand at that podium and one by one say, sir, your name. Jim Smith. Get out there.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Of the media that are getting substantially higher views than, than standard evening news broadcast. Substantially.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I Will say, this is.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Why are they not welcome?

[Tim Pool]

I want James O'Keefe to moonwalk on that in front of that podium while he kicks these people out and says, fake press. Gotta go.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I love James.

[Tim Pool]

He's great. I just want him. I want him to moonwalk while he does it.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Have you ever been to one of his parties? He's DJing. Yes, he's a great DJ. He's actually really good. Yeah, he gave me a whole lesson a couple weeks ago at a party. He let me, like, stand back there with the headphones and learn how to do things. It was so much fun.

[Phil Labonte]

Nice.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It was so much fun.

[Phil Labonte]

He's a very kind man.

[Tim Pool]

All right, everybody, let's jump to this next story from the Post Millennial. It is the Summer of Love 2.0. It has just kicked off. Antifa attacks TP USA tabling event featuring Brandon Tatum at UC Davis. Gear stolen and students assaulted. Check this out, yo. Tatum's not going to mess around. They just steal.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They just.

[Tim Pool]

They just stole the gazebo.

[Phil Labonte]

Like, do whatever you want.

[Tim Pool]

Do whatever you want all the time. They're not even doing anything. I don't get it.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They mogged him, they stole his stuff and left.

[Tim Pool]

Yep. The cops are like, all right, are they playing that Edmund?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Do they do that to try to copyright him while he's filming? Last copyright music.

[Tim Pool]

Oh, yeah, I was dancing. Well, I don't know if this means Summer of Love 2.0 definitively, but I'm hearing from a lot of the. The on the ground riot reporters that it feels like it's getting hot and it's going to be big.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, the. I mean, we were talking about this earlier. My. My inclination or my intuition is that there is not going to be a catalyst like the George. Like the George Floyd situation that in. That will involve the normies. That's not to say Antifa won't be all riled up and doing things like doing things like this, but this is. This is typical Antifa behavior. This is the stuff that they normally do go in there, essentially, they just go and they harass, you know, conservatives and stuff. Will they attack. You know, will they be attacking Tesla owners individually? I don't know. I don't get the sense that they will. That seems more like something that they've done it. I'm talking about.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They're also seeing 20 large. One of them.

[Tim Pool]

A large protest happened in front of a Tesla facility and some guy got arrested for flashing the employee's eyes with a green laser. And so the police Tracked the guy down, arrested him with the green laser. One of the employees, three employees, said that they were injured by it. They were, their eyes were blurry and that they were having headaches or whatever. One person left because he didn't want to be there while the protests were going on because they had flashed him in the eyes of the laser.

[Phil Labonte]

Well, I still don't, I still don't get the sense that you're going to see large scale antifa attacking, you know, the way that it was during the Summer of Love.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Based on where we are right now, I don't see that anything could change at any moment, any, any catalyst could happen. But I do believe, and I'm a free speech absolutist, I'm a Walter Brandeisian style free speech absolutist, that no one ever has a right to go and interrupt somebody else's protest. You wanna have a protest, you go stand on your side with your permit and you scream louder. Nobody has a right to attack anyone that's protesting anything.

[Tim Pool]

They firebombed buildings numerous occasions. There's been around 20 or so attacks on Teslas and Tesla charging stations and there's an untold number of attacks on Tesla vehicles already. Why would it stop?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean people are figuring out that they have 12 cameras facing every angle and they're going to get caught.

[Tim Pool]

No, there's a video, two videos in fact, where a mother and their children flick the camera off as they vandalize the car.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean then it's going to take the prosecutions that just started. Pam Bondi just announced 20 years sentence she's seeking.

[Tim Pool]

So I want to just add to that. These people seem to be doing it on purpose for, for attention. They know they'll get arrested, but they also know they'll get a million views.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, totally possible. I don't agree with anyone ever defacing property. I don't agree with anybody, anybody else.

[Tim Pool]

My point is, if it is already worse now than it was in the past years, what is the logic behind. I don't see it getting, I don't see it happening.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Well, I'm not saying I don't see protests, I don't see George Floyd level protests without a more significant catalyst than we have now.

[Elad Eliyahu]

If this was Trump's first administration, there would have been violence in my estimation. But with antifa coming up like this, I also think the Trump administration is cracking down on different kind of campus protests by withholding funding or trying to strip back funding from different campuses that are allowing stuff like this to occur. Obviously, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been doing a good job getting anti American, anti leftists deported out of these our country, stripping away visas from people like this. There was something I actually planned on inquiring with the administration about, and that's about mask bans at different protests for different reasons. In New York, on a part of Long Island, Bruce Blakeman actually banned masks at different protests. Protests events. Governor Kathy Hochul is considering this. Donald Trump would have the ability to ban masks at protests. On D.C. we've seen people waving anti American flag, support for terrorism with, with their faces covered at these different events. And I think that's another avenue Donald Trump could go down to make sure stuff like this doesn't get out of hand.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I want to be clear. I again, free speech absolutist. The answer to any kind of speech that is hateful, that is unjust, that is lies, that is. That is hurtful, is always more speech to drown it out. I don't agree with harm.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Can you add, you're a free speech absolute. Can you advocate for the murder of somebody else then? Does that.

[Tim Pool]

That.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That is someone say that? Yeah, absolutely they can. It's my job to scream louder.

[Tim Pool]

Free speech absolutists believe you can direct someone to commit a crime.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Sure. I just wasn't sure how far you.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Actually go with your louder. It's my job to be the louder voice. It's never to censor, ever. And the counterspeech doctrine written by Walter Brandeis still stands today. It's cited by the Supreme Court all the time. The answer is never, ever the silencing of hate speech. Like ugly speech, untruthful speech. It is always to be the louder voice, to scream louder, to say more, to be the truthful one, to be the kind one.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Slander. Does that include slander? Can we slander people?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean, if it's a crime that's causing them financial harm, they can take you to court. There are types of.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But with my free speech to slander you. I know this sounds.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm a public figure. It would be almost impossible for me to sue you.

[Tim Pool]

Not if. Not if he called you a pedophile.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, if I. I mean, sure. Like if you call. If you accuse me of a crime and it caused me harm, like there are.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's the limit to my free speech.

[Tiffany Cianci]

No. You could probably do it.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You wouldn't support laws banning me from doing so. I guess so.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't support silencing speech. I'm a free speech absolutist.

[Tim Pool]

What about obscenities I'm a free speech absolutist. So, like someone should be able to walk around playground with pictures of adults having sex.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That's not the same as speaking. First of all, if they were saying people's things like that, like, I don't know.

[Tim Pool]

Signs are not free speech.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Signs are not free speech. If you're holding a sign, I assume you have free speech to hold that sign. If you have the permits necessary, wherever you are.

[Tim Pool]

So can someone hold up a sign that says no taxes if there's no.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Loitering there and they don't have a permit? No. But if they have a permit and they're allowed to be there, yes, you need a permit on public land. You need a permit to do lots of types of protests.

[Tim Pool]

That's not free speech. Absolutely.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm a free speech absolutist. That you should never be able to censor speech.

[Tim Pool]

Never.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Even when I don't like it? Even when it hurts my kids.

[Tim Pool]

I guess.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I guess the question hurts things I care about. I don't agree with it.

[Tim Pool]

Define speech.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't agree that there's one kind of speech I don't agree with.

[Tim Pool]

Well, actually, I think it is kind of ironic considering TikTok is the most censorious platform available right now.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean, from what I hear, they're asking us to point out anything we think is being censored so that they can.

[Tim Pool]

So it's elitist and censorious.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't think they're elitist. No. I think that they actually advocate for the working class and provide small businesses with more opportunity than any other social media platform.

[Tim Pool]

From the work that we sound like.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You almost are a lobbyist on behalf of TikTok.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Nope, I'm not a lobbyist on behalf of them. I'm a small business advocate.

[Tim Pool]

TikTok banned us because they said our opinions are outside of the share their shared reality.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't agree with that and I think you should appeal it and I think you should go talk to them.

[Tim Pool]

They told us no.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Do you think you're allowed to talk about Taiwan or the Uyghur genocide or Hong Kong independence on TikTok?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I talk about crazy issues like that all the time.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, that specifically. Not like that. That you talk about Hong Kong independence and the Uyghur genocide in China and they don't buy any on Tik Tok.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I have. I haven't. I have literally spoken to Dr. Jill Stein and I talked about that when I had her on.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Wow, okay. Because they actually Have a history of. I know that.

[Tim Pool]

Let's just. Let's dive into this for a little bit. So you don't believe in a right to universal assembly, meaning certain grounds in the public sphere require permitting from a public source?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean, if it's private property, not just anybody can walk into my lake. My.

[Tim Pool]

Like home or public property?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Public property. Say it again then.

[Tim Pool]

So I said, can you hold up a sign? You said you would need a permit.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If you need a permit for that location because it's a no loitering area, I would assume you need a permit. So you have to follow the laws. But once you have complied with the laws, you should be able to say whatever you're there to say.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think it would be okay for someone to describe graphic sexual depictions in front of children in a playground?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't agree with it, but it's my job to scream louder and chase them out of there.

[Tim Pool]

So chase them out.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't agree with it. I don't agree with them doing that.

[Tim Pool]

But you.

[Tiffany Cianci]

But I don't agree with censoring something if it's legally allowed.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You defend their right to do it?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I defend. I would. I would defend the KK's right, the KKK's right to march. I don't agree with it. I think it's disgusting. You said chase, but it's my duty to defend it.

[Tim Pool]

You said chase them out. Are you. Do you mean that figuratively or literally?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean that with my voice. I don't mean that I should chase them anywhere. I mean, my voice should be louder. I should bring more people. I should have the louder assembly.

[Tim Pool]

Okay. Can a person hold up a sign that says no taxes in public?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

With children all around him with no taxes? Yeah. He says no taxes and he's in front of children everywhere.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If they're legally allowed to be wherever the children are.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, right. It's a. It's a. It's Times Square. Yeah. Can he hold up a picture of the Monopoly guy yelling no taxes?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean, if it's a trademark violation, then that would be a civil issue, but I don't care if he holds up the Monopoly guy.

[Tim Pool]

But is that free speech?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Is that free speech? I mean, I would think so, yeah.

[Tim Pool]

What if the Monopoly guy is naked?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Again, I don't have to like it. But if he's legally allowed to be there and it is speech, yes.

[Tim Pool]

So that actually is illegal.

[Tiffany Cianci]

So again, not legal. I don't agree. If they're not doing something illegal, I.

[Tim Pool]

Agree with it, but my Question is, for you, philosophically, can we hold up.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The Nirvana album with the naked baby under the water?

[Tim Pool]

There's a.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Actually a lot of T shirts. People walk around in it every day.

[Tim Pool]

That's true. And it violates in a lot of places. You will get arrested for that. New York probably wouldn't arrest you for the Nirvana album because it's a baby that's naked. But the issue is people will say they're free speech absolutists, but I tend to find that they're usually not.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I am.

[Tim Pool]

So we then have to question what you mean by speech, because I certainly don't think you would agree with a man holding up a sign showing two adults having sex in front of children.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't agree with their decision to do it, but I. Would I be the one screaming louder that they're idiots for doing it? Absolutely.

[Tim Pool]

You're screaming at a guy, but he's holding up an image.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Okay. And then that's still my.

[Tim Pool]

Louder. I wouldn't let him do it. I'd say the police should arrest them. I think that should be illegal.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I mean, if the police find it to be illegal, they will.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think that teachers should be allowed to tell. Tell children about gay sex, like in that book? This book is gay. Where it.

[Tiffany Cianci]

First of all, when you're at work, that is the. Not say not the same thing. When you are being paid to do a job, you do not have unfettered free speech when you're working on behalf of an employee.

[Tim Pool]

What about putting the book in a library?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Putting a book in a library. I don't agree with banning any book.

[Tim Pool]

So. So if the book tells children how to use Grindr, you're okay with that?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't like it. I can control my children. I can decide what they see. I can see what they bring home from the library.

[Tim Pool]

But what if they just read it at the library and you don't know.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If it's in a public library?

[Tim Pool]

Yep.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Again, I don't agree with banning any book because whatever they can ban on one side, they can ban on the other.

[Tim Pool]

What about.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It could be curriculums for whatever side you're on.

[Tim Pool]

What about in school curriculums?

[Tiffany Cianci]

School curriculums are not the same thing. Free speech is not the same thing as a school curriculum.

[Tim Pool]

So the school. So you would say. Would you say to a school, do not put those books.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Do not put those books what? In a curriculum?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, it's.

[Tiffany Cianci]

As a parent, I would advocate. I think it's my duty to advocate for my kids.

[Tim Pool]

Would you Take your kids out of the school if they were teaching that.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If they were teaching what specifically?

[Tim Pool]

So in it was Illinois, I did.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Take my kids out of a school and move them to a school I more closely aligned with.

[Tim Pool]

In Illinois, there was a teacher who is showing 10 and 12 year olds a book called, quote, this book is gay. It's the name of the book. And in it, it just. It. It explains how to use Grindr for gay hookups. Again, parents called the police on her.

[Tiffany Cianci]

And I'm going to say this again and again and again. Nobody has free speech in the course of their. Of their work. And so if the school is ordering them to do that, parents should be turning out and screaming loud in their protest. But there has never been any government in the history of the world that was on the right side of history when they censored their people.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think the United States was on the right side of history in World War II?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Was on the. Were we on the right side of history? Yeah, but we made huge mistakes.

[Tim Pool]

So. So you said there was never a country in history that was on the right side of history when they censored their people.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Censorship is never the way. Ever.

[Tim Pool]

So any country that censored their people was on the wrong side of history.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If that's what they were doing to further their agenda. Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Like the United States did in World War II.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I would not agree with that part.

[Tim Pool]

The US Office of Censorship and most famously the line, loose lips sink ships. Yes.

[Tiffany Cianci]

No, I don't agree.

[Tim Pool]

So then it would not be true that any country that sends that their people is on the wrong side of history.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I have never seen any country that has censored their people that was right or just in doing so, no matter what the outcome is. I'm a utilitarian, but I don't believe that the outcome can justify the means if you're giving up a fundamental right to get there. Because they cannot give it back. Just because we got it back in World War II doesn't mean we would get it back the next time. Okay, we wouldn't.

[Tim Pool]

Doesn't mean you wouldn't either.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Our founding Fathers created our Bill of Rights, the First Amendment, when they created the Constitution and the amendments and everything that our country fought for. One, the First Amendment was first because it is the bedrock upon which all of our rights are built.

[Tim Pool]

That is wrong.

[Tiffany Cianci]

We cannot advocate for any other right without the First Amendment. We lose our ability to do so.

[Tim Pool]

Actually, there were 17 articles first proposed which were whittled down to the 10 in the bill of Rights, some of them were combined. And the first, I believe, was actually was the salaries of members of Congress.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The final First Amendment was decided as the First Amendment, and it was stated so. Because without the freedom of the press, without freedom of speech, we lose the ability to advocate in defense of the rest.

[Tim Pool]

Did you know that for almost the entirety of American history, blasphemy was illegal? Obscenity was illegal. Swearing in public was illegal. So the Founding Fathers did not believe what you're saying.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I, I am telling you that I believe it.

[Tim Pool]

Sure, sure. But the argument that the Founding Fathers said the First Amendment is the most important only applied to the ideas they deemed acceptable. They actually didn't believe in free speech as you describe it. They thought that if a person went outside and said, I swear that they should be. They should be arrested. And in fact, up until the 70s, people were being arrested for swearing in public.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Fortunately, they didn't write it in the First Amendment, thank heavens, because that's what I defend.

[Tim Pool]

Well, well, right, but the First Amendment only applies as you describe it in the past maybe 20 years.

[Tiffany Cianci]

No, it hasn't been 20 years. Like Walter Brandeis was. Decades.

[Tim Pool]

You couldn't swear on tv.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I agree with you. You couldn't swear on tv. But those are privately owned networks, and.

[Tim Pool]

Then those are public airways.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Governed airways.

[Tim Pool]

That's right. And so the government, which shall make no law respecting the establishment of speech, banned certain speech on public airwaves.

[Tiffany Cianci]

And we got there, there were lawsuits sufficient to get us there.

[Tim Pool]

So for hundreds of years, free speech did not exist in the country, and the statement of the Founding Fathers did not actually apply.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I believe it and I'll defend it all the way.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Tiffany Cianci]

So no matter how bad it is.

[Tim Pool]

My only point is that we've constantly had this argument about the Bill of Rights and the way things should be. But as we interpret almost all the Bill of Rights, first, the ninth and tenth Amendment are the least applied amendments in terms of any and every law. Let's just, let's just go ahead and say outright the 9th and 10th do not exist because there's no circumstance in which they're upheld. The right of the states just doesn't happen. The federal government goes in and does whatever they want, whenever they want, even if they have no right to do it.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I think we're seeing a tilt back in that direction, though. I think that there's possibility there for.

[Tim Pool]

Some landmark cases, really, in terms of.

[Tiffany Cianci]

States rights and restoration of states rights. I really do think that we have some possibility there on Some landmark cases that are working their way through.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know the specific cases, but it seems as though the needle has only been pushing towards the federal government. Between states rights and the federal.

[Tim Pool]

Actually right now, one of the, one of the things you're seeing with Donald Trump in these tariffs, he talked about eliminating the income tax.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

And going to a tariff only system. When you, when you gut the federal government and you no longer need to spend money on the federal government, tariffs might actually when Trump talks about how we used to be very wealthy when we were only in a tariff system, at the same time the government was edp. So Trump may actually mean it when Doge goes in and shuts everything down and fires all of these people and they get the federal budget down to a pittance and then use tariffs to fund it, they may eliminate taxes or something that effect which then you have a very weak and almost non existent federal government.

[Tiffany Cianci]

A lot of my followers absolutely hate my position on what's happening with the layoffs. First of all, my husband is a federal attorney. I'm, I'm somebody that could absolutely like have a husband that loses her job to the federal layoffs. Nobody is mad when they look back and they see it. In 1996 when Ross Perot ran and got 18.9% of the vote, it was so terrifying to both parties when he said he was going to slash the federal government by 90% and he was going to balance the budget. Both sides were so scared of the 19% of the vote that he got that President Clinton took office and his first day in office said, Fire 125,000 people. And they did. And within three months, 375,000 people. And they did. And that was the last time we had a balanced budget and a surplus.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think we're really missing the elephant in the room here. The reason why we're in so much debt is because of entitlements. And no matter how much Elon Musk cuts a doge or whatever, we could cut our, the employees of the government by half. But if we keep paying out Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare and other entitlement programs at the current rate that we are given our population curve, the math just doesn't make sense. But it's also the third rail of politics. Donald Trump, President Donald Trump will not touch this because he will sink in the polls as a, as a result of this. So I don't know where that really leads us. But I feel like in the conversation about our debt and people struggling in the future and interest rates rising. All of this is a function of the debt that we keep adding to.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, I think, I think the end result of where we're going, I don't know what the probability is, but I think Social Security evaporates. So the, it's the argument that I made. So there's the Sam Cedar argument versus the Tim Pool argument. And I'm being somewhat facetious, but that was the conversation we had, Sam Cedar's argument. And I hope I'm getting this right, because as much as I think the guy is unlearned, his point was that Social Security is an economic driver. His point was not that elderly people need access to funds, but that when you give money to the elderly, they spend it creating economic stimulus. And that creates jobs and creates industry. So this large group of people basically take the money from them, give it to them, and they'll all spend it. That's the idea. My idea was people should take care of their parents, parents take care of the babies, the babies take care of their parents when they get older. We shouldn't be relying on the government because the system is dysfunctional and will ultimately become, you know, maybe insolvent is the, isn't the right word. But Social Security today can't actually help an older person live. There's no way you're living off Social Security. So my view is let's go back to a family oriented society where the children take care of their parents when those parents get old. And if the parents have 10 babies, guess what? They don't got to worry about much because those 10 kids are going to be able to help take care of those two parents. So I think based on what Trump is doing, there's a possibility to try and follow that route. Something to that effect where Social Security is gone.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I mean, we're robbing Peter to pay Paul. And it's. If we had a bigger population, it could potentially be fixed. But our population curve is also part of the issue at hand because we have less people contributing. And it ends up being a huge Ponzi scheme because I'm paying into a program that I will see no money from. I'd be better off holding that money and investing it myself.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, it is, it is a Ponzi scheme. But the only way that, that we can practically take care of the debt and deficit is by growing. We have to have economic growth. That's why things like deregulation and tax cuts are so important, because you'll never cut enough of the government. You're never going to get people on board to cut Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. So you have to manage the debt. And the only way you can manage the debt is by having enough, enough revenue coming in. And you will never tax rich people enough. You tax all the rich people out of existence and you'll fund the government for six months. You will never be able to tax enough to pay the debt. You have to grow. You have to incentivize economic activity. That's the only.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I hope that's how we get there. But I fear that our payments down on our interest is going to, you know, outpace what we spend on defense.

[Phil Labonte]

It doesn't. It. Well, I mean the.

[Elad Eliyahu]

God forbid.

[Phil Labonte]

I mean, look, it doesn't. It's the, it's not whether or not we hope it's the only option. Other options don't exist.

[Tiffany Cianci]

We, we have a. And like just going with what Tim just said and like the, the possibility of going back to a family oriented society or a tribal society where we take care of each other. The problem that we have right now with that even being plausible is that we have two generations in a row that can't take care of themselves. They could never take care of their parents. Yep, never. Unless we figure out how to right this ship. With the vast and disparate wealth inequality we have in America, with the wrong bell curve, with the reduction in birth rate, with the inability for people to afford to move out of their parents house, let alone get a job, get married, have kids, pay off their debt, is that we've got a lot of problems.

[Elad Eliyahu]

How do you think we should address income, so called incoming inequality?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Income inequality is a byproduct of our putting shareholders before people. And we have taken the onus away because of the vast monopolization and consolidation of our industry. We have taken the onus away. The further we've removed corporations and their headquarters from the communities they serve, which is a natural byproduct of sort of the crony capitalism we're living under right now. But the more we've removed it, the less onus we have to reinvest anything. I believe that we've incentivized the wrong types of investment in corporations and we have to write that.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So how do you want to address income inequality specifically?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Specifically, I mean like there's.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Because I hear this coming from the left a lot. That's why I ask. And I know what they have in mind. I don't know if you're.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Everybody can say tax rich, it wouldn't be enough. What I believe is we need to change the way we incentivize corporations. We need to re incentivize business development at the like the small business level. Right now this, the SBA is really the only chance that small business has to get equity and it's actually pretty hard to do right now. Banks won't give loans to actual small businesses. They give all their loans to big businesses. So it's getting harder and harder to start or create entrepreneurship which reduces competition. But at the same time, we've incentivized tax breaks for doing terrible things to communities. We've incentivized tax breaks for paying low wages. We've incentivized tax breaks for offshoring labor. What we should be doing is incentivizing tax breaks for those that reinvest in businesses here, that reinvest in better wages, that reinvest in building.

[Tim Pool]

Is that more regulation Trump's doing that's.

[Elad Eliyahu]

More regulation or less regulation?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I used to be an absolute libertarian that didn't believe in regulation. I, I, I have had to learn a lot about the type of like corrupted capitalism we're learning living in. I don't like it, but I have not had a single meeting with a sit down, die hard anti regulatory libertarian.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That learned they're not serious in any serious political way policy. Nobody has let me finish.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Really have to say I have not had a single sit down with a serious anti regulatory libertarian that didn't learn from me what I have learned about where our crony capitalism is. That didn't at the end of that conversation say I hate regulation. But we actually have to fix this, okay? Right now we have a system that is blind. We don't have a free market. We have a market that has captured the politicians. Capitalism at its core is a math problem, okay? Capitalism is an economic math problem. And economic math problems only do one thing which is serve the mathematical interest. Capitalism at its core, unregulated, is at all times trying to get as close to slavery as it can return to. No, no, no, no, no, no. Let me finish this thought. Don't cut me off there because I'll end up with a quote like clear, okay. At all.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You just said capitalism is as close to.

[Tiffany Cianci]

No, I did not say that. That's not what you said.

[Phil Labonte]

Don't put words.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I did not say that. I said is it is at all times as a mathematical endeavor trying to get as close to slavery as it can. The most production for the least amount of output, okay? Financially, that is capitalism's mechanism. It is only through guardrails that, that suppress the human condition for greed. That we keep capitalism on the straight and narrow. And the more regulation we have pulled away. Sometimes we've seen benefit, but we've also seen vast amounts of corruption. Coupling that with the amount of money that we allow corporations to use to control our government. We've removed the guardrails that actually protected capitalism.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Tiffany Cianci]

In a free market way.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think the regulation that you're arguing for would actually be counterproductive in the market.

[Tim Pool]

And what's the regulation though?

[Elad Eliyahu]

So she was implying, you were saying essentially like the low wages that people are forced to take. I don't think people are forced to take low wages.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I think people were forced to take low wages.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I said we've companies want to pay wages as low as they possibly can that people are willing to accept. Right.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I think that Dodge versus Ford mandates it.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, I think that makes sense in a capitalistic system. Why would I pay somebody more than my company is able to pay them? And then if you, you force me.

[Tim Pool]

To pay them a minimum amount, that is the precedent is a company must work towards the shareholder benefit, not their employees or company or community. That's not. So what that turns into is the company is incentivized, technically required. You can make the argument I offered $100,000 a year for this job and they took it. The boss then says, you could have gotten them for 50. Why'd you pay them so much? And they'll create a report and they'll mention it and the shareholders can get mad and say you are intentionally paying above market wages. Stop. And they're legally required to say we must be market competitive for the benefit of the shareholders. So the wages are dropped. And you're constantly going to have a circumstance where they're going to say 50. How about 45?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, the market should decide this, not the regulator.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The market is blind, not the regulator.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's not blind.

[Tim Pool]

It's not the regulator.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It is blind.

[Tim Pool]

The shareholders have.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The market is people and demand is made up by the people in the market.

[Tiffany Cianci]

No, no, no, no, no. Okay. So in free market capitalism. Free market capitalism requires absolute transparency and the ability of the market to respond to bad behavior. But when we hide bad behavior, when we hide that accountability and when we incentivize when we've over consolidated because we're not enforcing our antitrust laws, we're not enforcing our anti monopoly laws. Okay. The market is not free to act when there is not unfettered competition which we have allowed competition to be squeezed out in most of our industries. Look at the tech sector. Okay, we just talked about Apple at the beginning of this and how Apple hasn't had an actual innovation in 20x years.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Apple makes a great product. They're a successful company because people buy and like their products.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Apple, Microsoft, but he's forcing them to buy them. First of all, there's a lot of ways that they force people to buy them through their walled gardens and the investment they already have.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They're holding a gun to your head and telling you you have to buy these, these AirPods. No, I'm going to choose to buy these Apple products.

[Tim Pool]

Right. So, so hold on. So one thing you are wrong about a lot is that universities actually have deals and it's the exception, not the rule. No, there's, there's, there's actually companies like Apple will. And I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna say Apple specifically, although I do believe they have instances where they've done this. Will go to a business and say how much do you spend on your electronics? And they'll say our budget is a million bucks a year. They'll say we'll get you everything you need. Give us a list at 950. You'll say 50 grand. But your employees have to use our product. And they'll say done deal. Then the employees are like I got a job. And they go, but you have to use this product. And they'll go I've never used it before. I'm like, well then you can't work here. And so I've had dozens of people that I know say that their university mandated Apple products. The Apple products cost 10 times as much as PC products and all they've done is rebrand Unix. But they've taken free open source software, slapped their logo on it and they charge a premium.

[Elad Eliyahu]

People decide to purchase this overwhelmingly though. Okay, take it a step further. People buy universities. Aren't the people forcing most people to buy iPhones or books or AirPods. So it's choice. People have the choice to buy these products and they buy them because they like them. I think what you're preaching now is anti capitalistic and actually bad for people. It's because you think the regulators know better than the people in the market. You think regulators should be information.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They need to act, actually act.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Regulators who are, could be elected, could be unelected. It's just random. People should be, should decide. Right? We should have people have fixed prices.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I want to finish what I was saying about what? No, you guys aren't Companies right now, the way that they have stifled actual innovation, why we haven't seen real innovation in decades, is because they literally go to the universities and fund their think tanks. And when anybody has a fellowship to go into their think tanks, that's actually creating an innovative pro product, they have to sign it away with the intellectual property on entry to the think tanks. Everything from the Wharton School to MIT to UC Davis and everywhere in between.

[Elad Eliyahu]

These people are extremely innovative. All these companies are extremely in innovative though. And they're explaining a situation that's not accurate to the situation.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They are acquiring any possibly disruptive technology before it could ever hit the market. They're acquiring it. They get ownership of the patents, they get ownership of the intellectual property before it ever gets there. Look at the case right now that Trump initiated in his first term against Google for their anti competitive practices and the way that they were stifling innovation. They won for a reason. And now they're probably going to get busted on April 14th. Our trust bust is coming.

[Tim Pool]

I have a question for you. Do you think the FTC should exist?

[Elad Eliyahu]

No.

[Tim Pool]

You don't think there should be an FTC at all? No.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Abolish them. Let us have a freer market.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That's insane.

[Tim Pool]

So here's another question. When you know those balance bracelets, are you ever see one of those?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Oh yes, I have actually. Something Kobe Bryant used to wear too. It's like something that, yeah, it used the placebo effect to make people think they had better balance.

[Tim Pool]

Yes, that, that was the, that was the behind the scenes gist of. In fact, they defrauded people. They would use what's called the center of gravity illusion to trick people into thinking it gave them better balance.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Sure. And people under the FTC people still.

[Tim Pool]

Get the FTC shut them down.

[Elad Eliyahu]

A ton of fraud still committed while the FTC is open. And it gives consumers a false sense of security. Well, I'll undo that.

[Tim Pool]

The FTC shut them down.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Okay, but I'm saying do it instead.

[Tim Pool]

Of the okay, so you want to abolish the police too.

[Tiffany Cianci]

How does the market.

[Tim Pool]

You want to abolish the police. People. People still get robbed.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think, I think that's a different case for society safety because people still murdered. Police make sure. Absolutely. But the police make sure society is running properly. I think that's the ftc.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You just.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I disagree with the FT how the FTC works and I think it just ends up being a use of people in power.

[Tim Pool]

So one final question, one final question. Do you think I should be able to deceive people so that they give me their money.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't think. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So fraud's okay?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, well, frauds, it's an eye of the beholder, but yeah. And it happens all the time. And the FTC doesn't stop it.

[Tim Pool]

They do just do.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It's not enough and sure, whatever.

[Tim Pool]

So you're arguing you want more ftc.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, I'm saying they don't do the job that you're saying.

[Phil Labonte]

Ten minutes ago you were just dogging libertarians and now, and now like you're the guy that's like defending the libertarian position against the two people that are saying there should be regulation.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Ten minutes ago you were dogging libertarian anti capitalistic. And I think like again, we're spinning down a narrative that I don't think is true. Actually our tech sector is extremely innovative. But I think like this, this populist rhetoric is popular and that's why I think.

[Tim Pool]

Let me, let me ask you a lot.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So like TikToks and you don't know.

[Tiffany Cianci]

How I became famous on Tick Tock at all? Like maybe.

[Tim Pool]

Let me ask you, let me ask you a question. If, if I, if I'm allowed to deceive people in order to make money, do you think that would be a market advantage?

[Elad Eliyahu]

People say you people allege you do deceive people for money already though.

[Tim Pool]

But can I, can I. So you said you believe it would be okay for me to deceive people so that they give me their money.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yes. And the market should dictate that.

[Tim Pool]

Would that. Would the use of deception give you an advantage over other companies?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah. And people deceive? Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Do you think then in a free market that operates this way that the biggest corporations would end up being those that use deception option?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, I think the people in the marketplace. Yes, but I think people in the marketplace would be able to overcome that fraud because I think people are savvy. I have trust in people. Yeah, I think people are savvy in the marketplace and they would sense out fraud and then people would report on fraud. And I think that's who.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If there's no FTC to each other.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Hold on, we talked about it already and most people don't shop at certain companies, not because of the ftc, but because other people tell them not.

[Tim Pool]

Let's keep going. So then why is it that those balance bracelet companies never stop until they were shut down by the ftc?

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't even.

[Tim Pool]

I thought, I thought that people would smelt the fraud and shut it Down.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Why? Can you repeat the question? Why didn't it shut? Why?

[Tim Pool]

People will sniff out the fraud. How come those balance bracelet companies only they never got shut down until intervention from the ftc?

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think if they wanted to sell the balance bracelets and people were stupid enough to buy them and you're a stupid customer then you should be able to buy their stupid balance bracelet actually.

[Tim Pool]

Okay, so going back to my point point having an advantage in the marketplace. Companies that operate through deception will likely monopolize. They will become the most powerful corporations.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't think they'll become the most powerful corporations through fraud fraud because I think consumers are savvy and they'll be able to.

[Tim Pool]

But they couldn't even detect that a rubber, a piece of rubber wasn't giving them super.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well they could but there's. It's only a small part of the market. You're going to find some morons in every marketplace to sell stupid stuff to.

[Tim Pool]

So do you think pharmaceuticals can just a drug company can be like sure this pill will make your dick bigger.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think the. I think pharmaceuticals and health care is a different.

[Tim Pool]

Should be regulated.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That's a slippery.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Should be regulated. Yes.

[Tim Pool]

How do you define as pharmaceutical drugs.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That are prescribed by doctors to do.

[Tim Pool]

So regulates prescription hhs.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know who I think it's the hhs.

[Tim Pool]

Tell me the distinction between a supplement and a drug.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Supplements are all supplements are drugs but not all drugs are supplements.

[Tim Pool]

Tell me the distinction.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Supplements are. It's supposed to be used for like nutrition and drugs. Drugs is a very very over encompassing word but it could be anything that changes the chemistry of how it works in your body.

[Tim Pool]

Melatonin, what does it do?

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know what each and every drug does but I think melatonin is supposed to help you with changing some brain chemistry. Helps you go to sleep.

[Tim Pool]

So it's not a nutrition thing. It is a hormone regulation thing. But aren't drugs doing the same thing?

[Elad Eliyahu]

So like I don't know. Do you think supplements should be regulated more in our current marketplace supplements are largely not regulated. I think they should be regulated more. Yeah but in GNC you could pick up almost. I think I pick Jack 3D up from.

[Tim Pool]

I think vaccine supplements be regulated to a certain degree and we'll constantly review. But you're the anti regulation person which I'm asking.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Not on drugs in particular but I think we really go and off track.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You mentioned that we need police because people need to be protected. Do you understand that the only laws in the United States. The only laws that our government has decided that our. All of our. All of our elected officials decided were so important to the ongoing health, safety and economic security of the country that any American is allowed to enforce criminally are our antitrust laws.

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, I didn't think that.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They are the only laws that I'm allowed to take a company to court because they committed a crime in antitrust law. Do you know that?

[Elad Eliyahu]

No, but can you repeat that one more time so I could hear it more clearly?

[Tiffany Cianci]

In the United States that have a criminal element that are criminally enforceable that Americans can bring without the aid of a DOJ or anybody else or antitrust laws because it was deemed so dangerous to our economic model for monopolies to be able to monopolize in the way they are right now because our antitrust laws are outdated and never conceived of the types of digital environment we live in that we are allowed to prosecute our own antitrust law laws. Did you know that?

[Elad Eliyahu]

No.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It's true.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Wow.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Now, I want to. I want to go a step further because I believe in a free market economy, but we don't have one. If we were starting at a clean slate, I could get behind everything you just said almost. Okay. But we're not. And we can't be because our free market economy has been so blinded and corrupted by the abuse that has infiltrated the regulators that were supposed to keep the guardrails on.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But you're suggesting your solution, as I understand right, is more regulation.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You haven't let me finish this. Singles.

[Tim Pool]

I know.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Because you go in circles and don't really say anything in what you say.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I think we're going to.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I'm trying to get you to say something specific. That's why I'm trying to understand.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Let me give you one specific example that would be required for the free market to work. That does not.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You give me an example of a regulation you want to see changed. Yes, that's what I want.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I want to see the Federal Arbitration act changed. I want to see the Federal Arbitration Act. So in order for a free market economy to exist, we have to be able to see the bad behavior. And then the. The general idea is that if they're doing bad things, defrauding people or they're hurting kids or they're poisoning people, we bring massive lawsuits and that fixes it. And people protest and then the company.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Stops because let me know if I'm mistaken. We could sue companies for fraud currently.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm glad you said that. The answer is in Most cases right now. No.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Is that true?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yes.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Because I always see the most ridiculous lawsuits against.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That's because most of them have been suppressed in the free market economy so that we can't bring them anymore.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So, like, for example, this. I know this will be a ridiculous example, but McDonald, there was hot coffee. Hot coffee on one of the ladies, and she ended up suing McDonald's.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That was a little bit different because they'd actually overheated it and it's been sponsored.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But you're making it sound like we can't ever.

[Tim Pool]

Hold on, hold on.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Let me finish. Okay. Our laws have been so bastardized by the removal of guardrails that the Federal Arbitration act has allowed corporations to do unconscionable things. And we are not allowed to bring a court case that would allow us to let the free market know that unconscionable things are taking place. It is getting hidden in secret courtrooms where no one can see. They all have class parameters that make it so we can't bring class actions anymore. So we can't work together to afford to bring the cases. And so bad things, terrible things, deaths, horrible maimings are happening every day in America at the hands of these corporations. And none of us know about it because it is hidden in secret courtrooms and we can't bring class action laws. Okay, I want to see that law changed. And without it, we can't have a free market economy because the free market is blind. The only people that can bring those lawsuits are the ftc.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, it's powerful stuff. I heard a lot. I don't know. I still hear about lawsuits against corporations all the time. I'm not locking them up the right way. Maybe. I don't know if I don't.

[Tiffany Cianci]

One sentence.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I don't know. I don't know if I'm missing something here because I see. I see lawsuits you're missing against corporations all the time.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I want to tell you what happened. The reason I went to TikTok, the reason I became this person, I used to be a baby music teacher, is I was the head of a union that was targeted by a private equity firm and forced into one of those secret courtrooms. In my secret courtroom, I don't know if you know this, the Federal Arbitration act that is forcing 1.4 million Americans a year into secret court cases that they don't choose says that these judges that are paid $50,000 a week by big corporations to rule in their favor, these judges don't have to follow the law.

[Elad Eliyahu]

What court I'm just. Sorry, Just so I want to understand.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They'Re arbitration courts that are run by two companies, JAMS and the American Arbitration association arbitration court. And these courtrooms have been so bastardized to not allow Americans to see the bad behavior of corporations without their knowledge that they're being forced into secret courtrooms where they can't talk to the press, where they can't appeal, where they can't actually seek an enforcement of any law, and they're allowed to make up the law. Wait a minute. The judges can make up the law. They don't have to follow the law. And when they do, you're not allowed to go to an appellate court and demand that that judge be held accountable for breaking the law and their decisions. In my court case where I was a baby music teacher, a law firm was allowed. And I say this very rarely, I don't bring it up. I became famous on the COVID of the New York Times and the New York Post because my arbitration case, a private equity firm called DLA Piper, was allowed to file motions to force me to have an abortion against my will so I could be produced faster for a deposition. A deposition they could have waited two weeks for. They were allowed. They were file motions?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yes.

[Tiffany Cianci]

To compel me to expedite the scheduling of an abortion against my will.

[Elad Eliyahu]

They compelled you in this court to expedite your abortion? That's out. I've never heard of something like this. Maybe I need to read it now.

[Tim Pool]

Ask what that.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Because I had a gag and they forced you to. I. Yeah, by through. Oh, wow.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You can read about me in many.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Newspapers under threat of.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If you. If you violate a court order, they can hold you in contempt and you can be locked up. They tried to put me in prison last year, too.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Wow. And so there's no longer a gag order on this. Obviously.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I won my defamation case against them after they sent a bunch of letters to people saying I was abusing to children and then sent six letters to the New York Times saying I was running a drug trafficking ring at my baby gym.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Wow. And still a free speech absolutist after all that?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Still a free speech. Absolutely.

[Tim Pool]

I'm just. I think that the challenge I have a lot is that your position makes no sense. And to elaborate, you think there shouldn't be regulations on some products, but some products should have regulation? You said there should be no ftc, but some products should be regulated.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So health care. Yeah, I think health care should be regulated most other product by the government. Government by government agency.

[Tim Pool]

By the ftc.

[Elad Eliyahu]

The hhs FTC is.

[Tim Pool]

They handle the.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They're the enforcer of those laws.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They're only certain agencies.

[Tim Pool]

So there should be an FTC then because of drugs.

[Elad Eliyahu]

For drugs in particular. Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So then we'll keep the FTC just for drugs.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Okay.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think, I think Doge Elon Musk, we should send you after the ftc. I think they could do some.

[Tim Pool]

And how would you.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The smallest agencies in the government and they're deeply underfunded.

[Tim Pool]

How would you define drug?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, I think more specifically, I think medicine people, things that we are marketing to people to help cure different ailments that they have and usually are prescribed by doctors for, for medicine specifically drugs is over inclusive.

[Tim Pool]

There's a whole bunch of stuff that's not prescribed. That's a drug.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Sure. And that should be governed differently. Yeah, there's a line. I mean coffee's a drug, but I don't think you need to have access profen. Sugar is a drug. No. Yes.

[Tim Pool]

Ibuprofen is a drug and it's over the counter. You can walk up and grab it, walk out. You don't.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So drugs over inclusive. But I think once you pass a certain amount of harm for a specific drug to do that is supposed to heal you and cure your ailments, that needs to be regulated differently than about.

[Tim Pool]

What about. What about topical creams?

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know, on the specifics, I'm not too sure. Sure. It depends on what the topical cream is because some ointments are, you know, need to be prescribed and some healing.

[Tim Pool]

Rashes and preventing infections.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I guess it depends on the ointment. I guess we need to have a doctor in here to get into this position.

[Tim Pool]

You're not entirely sure?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Not on every example of everything.

[Tim Pool]

Right. There's probably a bunch of stuff that needs to be regulated that doesn't qualify as a drug.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think the FTC could lay their hands off a bit and focus on drugs more. Well, they don't do a good job at doing it in the drug market either. So I again, they're lulling people into a false sense of security as part of the issue.

[Tim Pool]

You would include like certain ointments and creams that can affect the body and potentially cause harm if using properly. But aren't drugs.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I feel like it would have to. To be a drug to. To do that. I'm not sure. I'm not sure.

[Tim Pool]

Drugs are specifically things that are usually used to pre treat, prevent or cure diseases or ailments. And so drugs could. But like as an antifungal for instance.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Something that could like interact with your body's chemistry to do us do a certain thing. So.

[Tim Pool]

So coffee, for example, not topical. Real quick.

[Elad Eliyahu]

It depends on the topical CRE cream. So.

[Tim Pool]

So that means some.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yes, I'm sure some do. Yeah.

[Tim Pool]

So. So non prescription topical creams may need to be regulated despite the fact they're not drugs, some of them.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So again, drug is kind of a spectrum, if you will.

[Tim Pool]

So. Okay, the point is, Elad, I'm going to say this before we go to our chats. You're literally just saying there are some products that are not drugs that need to be regulated and the FTC should do that. Which is a contradictor in your earlier position about the ftc.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think the FTC has too much power here and we could do. Elon Musk would do. Would be fine by cutting half of them. I don't think they do half of the job that they purport to do. And I think the regulations that was it Tiffany was alluding to are actually counterproductive. That was my main focus here. We're offering more regulation is actually going to stifle the capitalism that we're trying to promote here. I guess that was my larger point here. I don't think we should be getting lost on the FTC and the specific examples here. I think I was pretty clear on what I thought about that.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm being called to testify right now in a case. I just want to. I. He's talking about medicine. I'm going to talk about another example because historically in a free market, this example would be counteracted by the free market economy and the public. I'm being called to testify right now in a case on behalf of a little girl named Mia Hull. She was seven years old and she went to a trampoline park called Urban Air. Urban Air was in Ahwatukee, Arizona. They're owned by a private equity firm called Unleash Brands and Seidler Private Equity. And. And in this case, this little girl went to this park where they have a zip line that buzzes around the room, okay? And it's 30ft off the floor over concrete floors and metal tables. That's three stories, sometimes four stories in some of their parks, okay? And I'm being called to testify right now in this case because this little girl fell off this zip line and broke half the bones in her body and got permanent brain damage. The problem is that when her mom took her to that park, she signed her in on an iPad at the Front to say, hey, we're here for a birthday party. And they walked inside, not realizing that buried underneath that iPad language was a waiver of their ability to bring a lawsuit, forcing them into a secret arbitration court, and at the same time stopping them from bringing a class action with anyone else while simultaneously giving them a gag order, a confidentiality agreement, and a non disparagement clause so she couldn't go to the press. Okay? What she didn't know this little girl or her mom is that it was happening in dozens of these urban air parks all across the United States. States. And the reason no one knew is because everyone signed in on those iPads. You shouldn't need a lawyer to go to a birthday party. I want to be clear. You shouldn't be able to abuse our legal system that way. And so all of these people were being horribly maimed or getting internally decapitated at their kids party, swinging around zip lines from the ceiling like a ceiling fan. Okay? And this little girl, she is permanently changed. She's going blind. She's got permanent brain damage. Can't laugh, she can't cry. And in my court case, I was sent a huge stack of files from a whistleblower that showed their CEO received a warning that this was gonna happen. He was told, if you cut those harness checkers to save on your EBITDA for another cash infusion, these kids are gonna get hurt. It said it in these documents, and he said, do it anyway. And two weeks later, Mia was the first victim. Okay? And you know what? In a free market economy, the world wouldn't known people would be protesting outside urban areas all across America. Unleash Brands headquarters in Bedford, Texas, while Michael Browning sat inside, worried he was going to lose his business. But they aren't. Because these kinds of legal agreements that circumvent the free market have blinded it. And without guardrails, we can never have a free market again, ever. And people like Mia hall will continue to get penalized and they will lose their lives and their futures. And people like Michael Browning will continue to become multimillionaires millionaires without guardrails.

[Tim Pool]

We're gonna go to your chats. Your chats in now while you can. Smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. And don't forget, the uncensored call in show is going to be crazier than this. That'll be at 10. So go to rumble.com timcast IRL and join Rumble Premium using promo code TIM10. And if you want to call in, you have to Join the Timcast Discord server which is [e-mail]. sign up today and get in that Discord server server. All right. Andre Tucu says Canadians stop worrying about becoming the 51st state. Worry about becoming China's 23rd province. Beijing owns Comrade Carney.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Oh, Nio, it's a witty comment.

[Tim Pool]

That was good.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That was witty.

[Tim Pool]

True. Hello, says my parents mortgage interest rate was like 13% in 1983. The 4 or 2% rates were artificial. I think it got up to the 20s, didn't it? They were 20% in the late 80s.

[Tiffany Cianci]

It got up to like 2021 I think.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, yeah, crazy.

[Tiffany Cianci]

But they also had, you know, $20,000 houses.

[Tim Pool]

So CPR says boomer here. I just sold all my gold and silver coins today. So we'll have cash to buy into the stock dip.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Oh wow.

[Tim Pool]

Indeed. I bought the Tesla Dip when. When Elon was talking about buying X and then Tesla tanked down to like 113 or something. I was like, I looked at it and I'm thinking to myself there's no reason for Tesla to have dropped this dramatically. It's because of the press. So I bought a bunch.

[Elad Eliyahu]

And I love the contrarian stuff stock plays. I invested a lot of money into Crowdstrike after that, after there was some outage with their update. They're still one of the best security soft, full disclosure, yada yada. This isn't financial advice.

[Tiffany Cianci]

My comment section says you're never gonna let me come back.

[Elad Eliyahu]

There's the second time you're back in a couple of weeks.

[Tim Pool]

Why wouldn't yell at a lot.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, you're gonna be invited more back more. What are you talking about?

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

Gandhi says if daughter is watching the Next Generation for the first time, ensure she watches Star Trek 6 the Undiscovered Country. Tell her the frozen Klingon planet is Greenland and that's why Trump bought it. The Drumhead episode for the win. Star Trek the Next Generation is the best show ever. And funny trivia. Patrick Stewart, his agent, when he pitched it to him, he was like a seven year deal or something like that. Like some multi year deal. And his agent was like it's going to get canceled in a year. Just sign the deal. And then he was locked into the highest rated show at the time. Isn't that crazy? He and it's the best. He was great.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yes.

[Tim Pool]

All right, where we at? Stuart Vatsberger says wow, YouTube is even isn't even saying you're live more or less notifying me. Geez. Well, if you're watching. Make sure you hit that little notification bell. Not that it matters, but I guess it matters a little bit.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The number one comment I've had is asking Tim his favorite Pokemon, which I think is an inside joke. I've missed Temple in Switzerland.

[Tim Pool]

Temple?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Temple?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah. I'm a Pokemon.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You're a Pokemon?

[Tim Pool]

You didn't know this?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Nobody told me, bro.

[Tim Pool]

Are you kidding? I'm a Pokemon.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I was told to get your favorite Pokemon. I assumed it was an inside joke.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Where is it?

[Tim Pool]

Hold on. Pulling it up.

[Tiffany Cianci]

For the record, my favorite Pokemon is Blaziken.

[Tim Pool]

I'm a Pokemon.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Oh, like a tadpole.

[Tim Pool]

He's so cute. He's wearing headphones. See?

[Tiffany Cianci]

He's so cute.

[Tim Pool]

It almost looks perfect. Yeah, he's wearing headphones, and it's literally my name.

[Tiffany Cianci]

See? There you go, guys.

[Elad Eliyahu]

What does he evolve into?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Hold on, let me show you.

[Tim Pool]

I don't know. Some frog thing.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Oh, look, the pronunciation is Tim Pool.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah, there he is.

[Tim Pool]

Tim Pole.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, you should get a fee here.

[Tim Pool]

Someone told me to buy, like, 100 of these and then sign them, and whenever someone recognizes me, hand it out.

[Tiffany Cianci]

That's such a cute idea, actually. They're so expensive. I, I, I. Stuffies are, like, 30 bucks.

[Tim Pool]

I do have to say that I existed before they made this, which proves they based it on me.

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Obviously.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Clear.

[Tim Pool]

I mean, look, it is. It is literally wearing headphones, and its name is Tim Pool.

[Tiffany Cianci]

He's so cute, though.

[Tim Pool]

There you go.

[Tiffany Cianci]

He's a beanie.

[Tim Pool]

A small aquatic tadpole, like Pokemon. And does it evolves into Palpitoad and Seismitoad?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Oh, he's the one that has, like, speakers. Speakers, yeah.

[Tim Pool]

Well, there you go. Indeed. I am a Pokemon.

[Tiffany Cianci]

There's two with speakers, I guess I should say.

[Tim Pool]

Is that why they were asking me? I don't know.

[Tiffany Cianci]

I don't know. It was a, it was a recurring comment on my X feed today.

[Phil Labonte]

I imagine so.

[Tim Pool]

Indeed. Yeah. They. I'm in Pokemon and all the, the, the, the angry lefties can't do anything about it. And I'm gonna just let them know, like, that was intentionally me. You know, they, they are such big fans. It was introduced in Generation five, which was. Do they have the year on what Generation five was? Generation five. Wow. What year was generation. I have no idea.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Okay.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know your Pokemon stuff, huh?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah. My son. Well, so when I was. I have a much younger brother, and when I moved out of the house when I was growing up, that was the one thing we could do was, like, when Games would first start playing on the Internet together. And so I would play that early Pokemon Snap game and then we would do like Pokemon Red and Pokemon Pearl. Like my, my little brother made me like Pokemon and now me and my 8 year old son play Pokemon.

[Phil Labonte]

There you go.

[Tiffany Cianci]

And I, I'm really good friends with. I should bring you in. I'm really good friends with the guys who own Tournament City Games in Frederick.

[Phil Labonte]

Okay.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Yeah. So I, I go down there all the time and hang out with them. Play Pokemon.

[Tim Pool]

Cool. Michael C. Says C. Charlie, Anything on pizza is acceptable. Be a friend. Tell a friend something nice. To be honest, I love pineapple pizza.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I like change on my pizza. Variety. No, like, oh, Phil. How could you just. Variety is the spice of Phil. Variety is the spice of life. So, you know, whether it's olives or. Never mind.

[Tim Pool]

Falafel.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Falafel.

[Tim Pool]

What if, what if I only like.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Style deep dish pizza? I'm not a pizza girl.

[Tim Pool]

Tourist pizza a lot. I'm going to order a pizza tomorrow and I'm going to put Israeli salad on it just for you.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I love it when people call it Israeli salad.

[Tim Pool]

That's what it's called?

[Elad Eliyahu]

Yeah, yeah. No, well, some people, what do they call it? Offended. And they. Yeah, yeah, Israeli. Some people call it Jerusalem salad because a lot of Arabs started picking up the Israeli salad stuff and they get real sensitive when people call it that.

[Tim Pool]

So I'm going to, I'm going to order a pan pizza with Israeli salad on top just for you.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I'd love that. Sounds like.

[Tim Pool]

I got to be honest, it sounds pretty good.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know, in Israel they love olives on the pizza. Those Israelis on pizza.

[Tim Pool]

Just. Yeah, of course.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I feel like it's not very common in the States.

[Tim Pool]

No, you're wrong. It's supreme. Supreme pizza is like what? Pepperoni, sausage, green peppers, onions and pepper.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, pepperonis.

[Tim Pool]

Pepperonis, yeah, olives. You go to any supermarket and you look at their frozen pizzas and they're gonna have supreme with black olives on it. Indeed.

[Phil Labonte]

Now I want pizza.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, we'll order some tomorrow.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's the thing, missing out here. I don't know if I'm just going to the wrong places or I'm spoiled.

[Tim Pool]

Pizza oven in Inwood, West Virginia has the best pizza.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I'll give it a shot.

[Phil Labonte]

Really? Really.

[Tim Pool]

They call it deep dish, but it's pan and that's fine. It's okay. I'm not gonna come down on them because it's really good.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know, I went to Chicago. I wanted to get a deep dish slice. But they said you have to order the full pie. And I was like, yeah, I'm not doing this. I'm sorry. I'm just not gonna try it.

[Tim Pool]

People in Chicago don't eat. Eat that.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, I don't either, so. Because I don't want to order a whole piece.

[Tim Pool]

It is funny, though, when people are like, oh, in Chicago, you have deep dishes. Like, we don't eat that. It's. It's for you. And then people think they're eating Chicago food. People in Chicago don't eat that. We eat little square pizzas, little squares, tavern style. That's the way to do it. But dish is good. You know, sometimes like you. It's like a. Maybe a once a year thing you might do.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Well, it's like a family thing because you're not going to take a whole, whole deep dish pizza, bro.

[Tim Pool]

I ate a whole pizzeria Uno's deep dish, like three months ago. No problem. That's why I'm like, I don't know. I'm. I am a. I am a vacuous pit. I can. I'm not kidding. If we go to Uno's, give me a pepperoni, large deep dish. I'm eating the whole thing.

[Tiffany Cianci]

The only, the only kind of pizza I get down with. That's not like, I'm not a pizza girl. I'm just not. But I love really thin crust, like really Italian style pizza pizza that like, I want it to like, like fold in my hand but be crispy on the bottom.

[Tim Pool]

Like, I want, like portnoy.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Sure.

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, yeah, good undercarriage.

[Tiffany Cianci]

But he likes. Yeah, good undercarriage, right? But he likes, like a very Americanized version. And I would like it with like very Italian ingredients. Like, give me a margarita pizza.

[Tim Pool]

There's a. There's a place not too far away. It's called Taste Buds. They have exactly what you're talking about. Yeah, it's good.

[Tiffany Cianci]

There's a place in Frederick called. What's it called? Oh, God, I don't remember. God.

[Tim Pool]

Oh. Let's grab some more chats. All right. Russell W. Says my handmade ring biz has been suffering from cheap import rings from oversea overseas markets. Drowning me out of the market. Really hoping recent events change things. Much love Carbon District rings. I agree. Now I will say I think tariffs need to be strategic because I suppose there's a couple ways to look at it. Like, so cast brew.com we have coffee, right? Well, the coffee is literally the region. So you can get Guatemala, you can get Colombian, you can get Costa Rican. We have coffee in America. It's Kona. It's expensive, and there's not that much of it because it's just. It's Hawaii. That's where you make it. So if they're gonna put a tariff on everything, in general, they're restricting things you can't even make here. So I suppose the argument is it's a specialty product. Just. Just pay. Pay more for it. I guess it would. The tariffs make sense when it was cars. Right. That's what I'm. That's why I've been lightly concerned. I say lightly about universal tariffs. When Trump was talking about steel, aluminum, autos and stuff, I'm like, we can do all that here. That's good. Skateboards, we can do that here. That's good. But if it's literally like Guatemalan coffee is these. Is the product that exists only from Guatemala, you know, I'm not sure that makes sense. That being said, said I'm an adult. I voted for Trump. I stand by his decisions, and I will accept what comes with them. And I'm not going to cry about it. I don't agree with everything he does. Never did. And it is strange to me, there was a really funny exchange between Clint Russell and Michael Tracy on X. Follow them both. Yeah, you saw that one?

[Phil Labonte]

Yep.

[Tim Pool]

And Russell was like, you know, Trump is doing a thing I'm critical of. And Michael Tracy was like, you're so dumb, you voted for him. And Clint's like, well, Clint said something particularly disparaging about his. His birth defects. But the general idea I get from the whole thing is, bro, you don't have to just agree with literally everything Trump does all the time. You can be like, he was pretty good. I'd have chosen somebody else. But, you know, he's all right.

[Phil Labonte]

Particularly in this context, it is completely acceptable to vote against Kamala Harris.

[Tim Pool]

Right.

[Elad Eliyahu]

I think a lot of Internet libertarians also projected what they wanted to see onto Trump and gave themselves a false sense of reality, completely different from what Trump actually is. So when they see him doing stuff, they're. They're all confused. But this was Trump all along. And if you paid attention during the first term or paid attention to anything he's really said or done, this shouldn't come as a surprise to anybody.

[Tiffany Cianci]

So my first livestream with Trump was at the Libertarian National Convention when he came and spoke, and he said there were several issues he was going to talk to him about. He made a promise. He would address, like, six specific things. One of them was freeing Ross Albrecht, which he did. And libertarians seemed very excited about that. But he ignored Gabriel Shipton and trying to address WikiLeaks and all of the whistleblowers. And I, I think he made a good pitch to them at the Libertarian National Convention. That was convincing on a lot of those issues. And he has changed his mind about some of that. So I, I get some of it. But, but you can't be like, even libertarians know you can't be a libertarian absolutist when you're starting not from scratch and starting from a, from a system that's already imperfect.

[Tim Pool]

The dude abides 95 says not Tim F. Those penguins. Yeah, shut them down. Down. Hal Gailey says, me thinks the islands were used for money laundering. That's a good point. They just use those and they're like, yeah, that's where it came from.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You know what I'll say. Even I listened to Ben Shapiro's show this morning. Even Ben Shapiro was pushing this Penguin narrative. Was he really? He was. Yep, he was. I think that's where I heard it first. And I was confused, too, because I was like, there seem there must be more to this because there's never any unincorporated, unclaimed lands on planet Earth.

[Tim Pool]

Here's what you did new. If you've got, if, let's say you're an Australian, there's a tariff. If you import something, if something comes from Australia to the US they're going to pay an import tax. So you ride your boat up to Heard Island. Pause for a second thought. A manifest saying equipment from Heard island, and then bring it to the U.S. no tariff. That's why Trump is putting tariffs on these things. He's trying. It's, it's, it's, it's. These people are so disingenuous. Even if no product came from these islands, Trump is basically saying, we are not going to allow loopholes. That's it.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Because, you know, they would just go make a dock there and then ship it around, right?

[Tim Pool]

Yeah, well, that's right. And they may still do that. They may. I mean, look, if you're, if you're going to lose $60 billion over a year because you're China, they're going to say, okay, let's build an artificial island, put the products there, put up a flag and then say the products came from there, not tariffs. And Trump's going to then go, now, we'll put a tariff on that, too. That's the point.

[Elad Eliyahu]

What did he tariff? China.

[Tim Pool]

Because that's my Favorite Was it 30?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm getting a lot of questions about tariffs on Russia. A lot of people are saying, what are the tariffs on Russia?

[Tim Pool]

Nothing. Because Russia is sanctioned.

[Tiffany Cianci]

They're sanctioned, yeah. Correct.

[Elad Eliyahu]

But Trump, Trump is mulling. President Trump is mulling second hand tariffs for those who buy oil from Russia.

[Tim Pool]

Right, There you go. So you get this narrative from the press because they're liars, where they're like, Trump didn't sanction Russia. No, I'm sorry, they say Trump didn't tariff Russia. No, he sanctioned them. So he's actually barring other people from doing business with them or actually, I think they were already sanctioned and then he imposed. Actually, yeah, I think he's only been office a couple months. So they are under sanctions already. So you don't need to. And there's a war going on and as you mentioned, secondhand sanctions. Anybody who does business with them for oil trades, he's going to put tariffs on them. So yeah, he's not helping Russia.

[Elad Eliyahu]

He didn't have to put a tariff on the Nordstrom 2 pipeline. So.

[Tim Pool]

All right, Sterling Wilson III says, am I wrong in thinking that more manufacturing makes more jobs, which allows more people to get taxed, allowing U.S. worker personnel, income taxes to drop. So you can do it a couple ways. Volume is usually the best. If I was running a business that sold coffee, I would rather sell at a 1% margin, a million bags a week, as opposed to having a massive margin but having to sell, you know, only 100 bags eggs. So what happens is for smaller businesses, they need to make more money to survive. Let's say you're, you know, a little Israeli salad distributor. A lot Eliyahu. A lot salads, A lot of salads. And he only sells maybe 15 per week. How much does he have to sell the salads for to make a living? Well, he's got to pay his rent, he's got to buy the materials. So he's going to need maybe, you know, 500 bucks at least a week and that's bare minimum, which is barely going to cover rent in a big city. So if he's working on, on, on the razor thin margins for his own personal costs, those sales are going to be expensive. But let's say a lot gets it up to a million salads per week. Well, bro, I got to be honest. If you, if you, if you made only a dollar off each sale, you're making a million bucks a week. You could actually make 10 cents off of each salad instead, your profit margin could literally be a dime and you're going to be pulling in 100k a week. So the more people we tax, the more money the US makes. And then the economic activity, all of it will end up in the hands of the government. 100. Think about it. I have a dollar. I give it to a lot Elad's got to pay. Fill the tax. So elad pays Phil 35 cents. Now he's got 65 cents. He then gives 65 cents to me in exchange for services. I got to give Phil 30. So I give Phil 18 cents, 19 cents. The government eventually gets it all. So the more people, the better. Jacob Jones says perhaps the penguins are highly intelligent and advanced and have been very good trade partners to the US hence why it's only a 10% tariff. Well, I don't know if I'm supposed to say this, but in my interview with Trump, he did mention to me off camera that there is an island where a highly advanced civilization of penguins have created a barrier so that no one can see through it. Unfortunately, one of the penguins actually developed a headband which gave him psychic powers to mind control people. People. And now he's at odds with the Justice League.

[Phil Labonte]

Yeah, yeah.

[Elad Eliyahu]

You kind of look like you have the penguin colors with your sweater being kind of white in the right areas and then black maybe.

[Tim Pool]

I'm friends with the penguins.

[Elad Eliyahu]

That's why we've been talking a lot.

[Tim Pool]

About this is what people don't understand. It's not Mossad, it's the penguins. The whole time.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Penguins.

[Tim Pool]

That's right. They've been paying for this show.

[Tiffany Cianci]

You know it's illegal to communicate with dolphins in our country.

[Tim Pool]

What? What?

[Tiffany Cianci]

Did you know that?

[Tim Pool]

Did you know that there was not.

[Tiffany Cianci]

To touch them, to communicate with them?

[Tim Pool]

Go look it up. Did you know that there was a.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Were you trying to talk to them? Is that why they came after you?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I'm telling you, it is illegal to communicate with dolphins.

[Elad Eliyahu]

So that's why.

[Tim Pool]

Did you know that there was a woman that was living in a house that was semi flooded with a dolphin and the dolphin was trying to get some from her? It's true story. Why do you have videos of very famous Internet stories?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I know a lot of Internet stories and I don't know that I. I.

[Tim Pool]

Never gotta get on X Men. You get on X Men, you learn a whole bunch of stuff. You wish.

[Tiffany Cianci]

If that was a sales pitch, it's.

[Tim Pool]

Like, oh my God. Remember that line from. From the Dark Knight where Scarecrow, the mobsters are like, your drugs are. Look what they're doing to our people. And he says, I told you my drug would take you places. I never said they'd be places you wanted to go. That's, that's like. That's the Internet, basically. You know, you go there and then you just, you know, that's why there's the phrase welcome to the Internet.

[Tiffany Cianci]

Sounds more like a rumble thing than.

[Tim Pool]

My friends smash the like button. Share the show with everyone you know. Become a member of our Discord server. Don't just be a passive observer. Be an active participant. Join us timcast.com Sign up. There's a couple different tiers, but if you sign up for 25 bucks, you bypass all the barriers. We have that set up because there's crackpot weirdos trying to come in and cause damage. But it's 10 bucks a month. You get in there, you share your ideas, you hang out with people. People. Join us. Call into the show that members only. Call in show starting in just about a minute or so. Use promo code [e-mail] to watch it and get 10 bucks off your annual membership. Follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast. Tiffany, do you want to shout anything out?

[Tiffany Cianci]

I just want everybody to keep following along as we work together to save small businesses in our community. Follow me on TikTok and YouTube @Tiffany Cianci and on X and Instagram at the Vino Mom.

[Elad Eliyahu]

Tiffany, it's been fun. I'm sure the after show is going to be even more fun. Hey everybody, I am your White House correspondent. You could find me at a lot Eliyahu on all the platforms. There's a lot of exciting things going on in the White House press briefing room, so be on the lookout for that. Phil.

[Tim Pool]

I am Phil.

[Phil Labonte]

That remains on Twix. I'm filler remains official on Instagram. The band is all that remains. Our new record dropped on January 31st. It's called antifragile. You can check it out on all the streaming platforms. Don't forget the left L lane is for crime.

[Tim Pool]

We will see you all in about 30 [e-mail] Timcast IRL thanks for hanging out.