Loading summary
Ryan Reynolds
Hey, Ryan Reynolds here wishing you a very happy half off holiday because right now Mint Mobile is offering you the gift of 50% off unlimited. To be clear, that's half price, not half the service. Mint is still premium unlimited wireless for a great price. So that means a half day. Yeah, give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront.
Mint Mobile Announcer
Payment of $45 for three month plan equivalent to $15 per month required new customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of network's busy taxes and fees extra see mintmobile.com.
VRBO Announcer
Did you know you can opt out of winter with VRBO? Save up to $1,500 for booking a month long stay with thousands of sunny homes. Why subject yourself to the cold? Just filter your search by monthly stays and save up to $1,500. Book now at vrbo.com.
Acast Announcer
Acast powers the world's Best Podcasts Here's a show that we recommend.
Knox or Jamie
Do you like being educated on things that entertain but don't matter? Well, then you need to be listening to the Podcast with Knox and Jamie every Wednesday. We put together an episod dedicated to delightful idiocy to give your brain a break from all the serious and important stuff.
Mint Mobile Announcer
Whether we're deep diving a classic movie, dissecting the true meanings behind the newest slang, or dunking on our own listeners for their bad takes or cringy stories, we always approach our topics with humor and just a little bit of side eye. And we end every episode with recommendations on all the best new movies, books, TV shows or music.
Knox or Jamie
To find out more, just search up the Podcast with Knox and Jamie. Wherever you listen to podcasts and prepare to make Wednesday your new favorite day of the week.
Acast Announcer
ACAST helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere. Acast.com.
Charlie Sykes
Look, I have to warn you, this is the scariest thing you're going to hear today, and if you're not scared, well then you're not paying attention. Pam Bundy is creating a list of extremists and terrorists and you might end up on it. Seriously, I'm Charlie Sykes with a special emergency to the contrary. Because you really have to know what's going on here. Look, let's step back a bit. If you want to understand how a new domestic security apparatus is born, you usually have to look for a moment of crisis, a trigger event, a reichstag fire, or a 9 11. For MAGA, that moment was the September assassination of Charlie Kirk, and that shocking murder was immediately framed by the Trump Administration as nothing less than a 911 type event. Now that's the kind of language that demands a huge national security response. And that's what we are getting. And it's as alarming as hell. Attention needs to be paid to all of the details. That's what I want to kind of lay out for you what's going on here. You may or may not have heard of this eight page memo issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi. It's not just policy, it's the detailed tactical guide for implementing Trump's bigger strategy on organized political violence known as S. What is it? NSPM7? You don't need to know that, but you do need to understand how this new policy works and what it actually does. And specifically what it tells the FBI to do, local law enforcement, the kinds of things they are ordered to do, and the genuinely shocking ideological criteria used to define this domestic threat and how it creates a shadow terror designation regime. This is something that Congress explicitly chose not to authorize. And so it is a remarkable study of raw authoritarianism. And it could reshape dissent in the United States of America for years to come. Now, Bondi's memo says it targets domestic terrorism, but its focus is almost exclusively on ideology. I mean, the memo's language essentially builds a composite culture, war, enemy. It shifts the entire focus from what illegal things you might be planning to what political ideas you might have. And Bondi's memo is incredibly specific. The memo tells law enforcement to target those expressing. Now listen to this. Number one, opposition to law and immigration enforcement. Criticize ice. Number two, extreme views in favor of mass migration and open borders. Three, adherence to what they call radical gender ideology. Number four, anti Americanism, anti capitalism or anti Christianity. And then there's, number five, hostility towards traditional views on family, religion and morality, to which the proper reaction is what the actual fuck? How's an FBI agent or a local cop supposed to measure hostility towards traditional views on family? What does that even mean? Does it mean they're monitoring your social media, who you donate to, who you're sleeping with? I mean, the criteria are so vague, they invite subjective interpretation and mission creep and they're going to end up targeting views that are constitutionally protected. This shift from behavior to ideology is the biggest change. It's the single most alarming feature of the whole thing. Now, the memo starts by relying on the specifics of Charlie Kirk's murder to justify a focus on groups like Antifa. And it cites reports the bullets that killed Kirk were carved with anti fascist taunts. You know, you heard about this, you know, fascist catch and references to the anthem Bella Chow, which is actually a pretty good song. And Bondi uses those details to frame the whole policy as a necessary response to what they call a sophisticated campaign of left wing political violence.
Lexi or Nicole
And.
Charlie Sykes
And the mechanism they propose is structural and it's meant to be permanent. Bondi ordered the FBI, along with state and local partners, to compile this constantly updated list of groups engaged in acts that may constitute domestic terrorism. That's not a suggestion, it's a court order. And they have just 30 days to submit an initial report with specific disruption strategies, and then they update it every month. The main target, supposedly is Antifa now, which is a problem because Antifa is a decentralized collection of people who share far left ideologies. Not really an organization with a leader or a formal structure at all. But Bondi's memo treats it like it's a command and control hierarchy. And she's demanding an intelligence bulletin on antifa's structures, networks, funding and tactics as if they're mapping Al Qaeda or something. And if they're challenged in court, DOJ can just say, oh, we're just targeting criminal acts by individuals. But operationally they're treating the ideology as a structured threat, which allows for much broader intelligence collection. And to do that ideological mapping, the memo brings in heavy hitters. The Joint Terrorism Task Forces are the main vehicles for domestic counterterrorism. They put FBI agents alongside state and local police who get access to federal intelligence, pretty much everything. So this is no joke, and it's not merely performative, because using those task forces immediately scales this up across the entire country. And they're looking backward too, at your past. Bondi's memo directs the FBI and the task forces to retroactively review five years of old files. So they're basically hunting for past acts that now can be recharacterized as being adjacent to domestic terrorism and then referred for prosecution. So they're building a history for this new threat. And they can take past actions like, say, I don't know, doxing law enforcement or messing with ICE agents and sort of weave this into the new, broader network that they're trying to map. And again, the shift in focus from behavior to ideology is even more significant when you see what they leave out. I mean, they focus almost exclusively on the left. Now. The data says something else entirely. There was a DOJ funded study that show that far right attacks from white supremacists outpace all other forms of domestic violence. And what a surprise that was deleted from the department's website back in September, just before this directive came out. So the Trump administration effectively purged evidence that contradicted the very threat profile they are building this entire security apparatus around. And it reinforces the idea this is less about the threat and more about constructing a certain type of enemy that fits with their political agenda and grievances. So groups that advocate, I don't know, for immigration reform, trans rights activists, anti capitalist organizers, really, anybody who sits at the intersection of those five markers I mentioned can now be slotted into this network mapping apparatus just based on their beliefs. So the chief legal counsel for whistleblower aid, I mean, nailed it when he said the memoir expressly seeks to define political dissent against the President as domestic terrorism. Yeah, shit. It directs federal law enforcement to treat people who are just, you know, anti Christian as potential terrorists based on their belief alone. So it weaponizes cultural debates, turns them into grounds for a federal investigation. Now, how's that going to work in real life? I mean, how will that be operationalized? Take a deep breath here. This memo has specific and pretty aggressive instructions on that. They want Americans to snitch on one another. Bondi's directing the FBI to massively enhance the publicity of its tip line to get people to report on one another, to aggressively solicit tips about other Americans, and they're monetizing it. Bondi's memo authorizes witnesses and so called citizen journalists to send in media of things they think are suspicious. And there's a cash reward system for information leading to arrests of leadership figures. And they plan to cultivate cooperators to testify against other members. But really, it gets worse. There's a clear directive to hit these groups financially. They instruct prosecutors to look for tax crimes even if their goal is not an actual conviction, just disruption. I mean, they're attempting to revoke the tax exempt status of left wing groups. We kind of knew that. But also just harassment. If you scare away their donors by suggesting they're under investigation for tax fraud or terrorism, you crippled them whether or not any charges are ever filed. And the feds are now told to use all available investigative tools, including international ones, to map this network, which explicitly includes organizers, funders and affiliates, creates this massive financial incentive for local police to chase these cases. And now we get to the genuinely scary part. Yeah, there's more. This list, this internal list, is directly linked to the terrorism sentencing enhancement. Under federal law, that enhancement's the hammer in this toolbox. So you don't need a law that says you're guilty of domestic terrorism because there isn't one. Prosecutor just has to convince a judge that a different crime, I don't know, like vandalism, was committed with an intent to influence the government. And therefore it is connected to a domestic terror investigation, the kind that are listed in this memo. And boom, the sentencing enhancement can be triggered. And that can turn a mid level offense into a sentence that might be measured in decades. I mean, it's an incredibly powerful tool to coerce plea deals or to secure extreme sentences, all without a formal terror law. So this is not just an aggressive memo. It creates a secret domestic terror list that Congress never approved. And Congress deliberately avoided creating a designation system because of these First Amendment issues. But by treating this list, this secret list, as an operational tool, not a formal public designation, the Bondi memo basically tries to sidestep judicial review completely. Groups are put on this list based on the Bureau's own assessment that their activities may constitute terrorism. No notice, no hearings, no appeal. It's a designation regime built by stealth. And that lack of due process is the key to maximizing this chilling effect. The chilling effect, because the network mapping logic means that even being adjacent to those ideas can be dangerous. Like donating 50 bucks to a legal defense fund that's ending a peaceful protest. These all can be treated as potential evidence of being part of a broader network. And the fear is designed to make people obey in advance. That sound familiar? Obey in advance. So nonprofit donors can just pull back from any controversial cause, not because they're violent, but because they're terrified of ending up on this file, in this file that could trigger that kind of sentencing enhancement. So this is why you need to pay attention. Trump is building this powerful domestic counterterrorism apparatus without congressional approval. And they filled it with very specific ideological criteria. The policy does not just shape law enforcement, it fundamentally reshapes the risk calculation for just participating in American civil society. And if that terrifies you, you are not the crazy ones. I'm Charlie Sykes. Thank you.
LifeLock Announcer
The holidays mean more travel, more shopping, more time online, and more personal info in more places that could expose you more to identity theft. But LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second. If your identity is stolen, our US based restoration specialists will fix it, guaranteed or your money back. Don't face drained accounts, fraudulent loans, or financial losses alone. Get more holiday fun and less holiday worry with Lifelock. Save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com Specialoffer terms apply.
Acast Announcer
ACAS powers the world's best podcasts. Here's a show that we recommend.
Lexi or Nicole
Are you a fantasy reader looking to cure your book hangover? Then welcome, welcome, welcome to the Fantasy Fangirls podcast. I'm Lexi, older sister and fantasy Lore nerd. And I'm Nicole, younger sister and romantic at heart. And we love exploring these stories, worlds and characters well beyond the last page. Fantasy Fangirls is not your typical book. Deep Dive podcast. When we say deep dive, we mean deep Dive, where every episode covers a stretch of chapters and is structured with five segments to easily follow along. We are currently deep diving Quicksilver by Callie Hart in the lead up to its highly anticipated sequel, Brimstone. We're so excited. We hope you join us as we travel through the Quicksilver to dive deep into literary and character analysis, theories, lore, themes, and so much more.
Acast Announcer
ACAST helps creators launch, grow and monetize their podcasts everywhere. Acast.com.
Special Episode: "Pam Bondi Might Be Coming After You"
Date: December 10, 2025
Host: Charlie Sykes
In this urgent special episode, Charlie Sykes confronts the alarming implications of a new domestic security initiative spearheaded by Attorney General Pam Bondi under the Trump administration. Sykes meticulously unpacks an eight-page memo, revealing how it establishes a sweeping and ideologically driven domestic terror designation system—one that, he warns, could target everyday Americans based on their beliefs rather than actions. The episode serves as both a warning and a call to vigilance regarding the erosion of civil liberties and the construction of an authoritarian apparatus poised to chill dissent across the United States.
"If you want to understand how a new domestic security apparatus is born, you usually have to look for a moment of crisis, a trigger event..." ([01:43])
Overview:
Targeted Ideologies:
The memo directs focus towards individuals or groups expressing:
Sykes’ Reaction:
"To which the proper reaction is what the actual fuck? How’s an FBI agent or a local cop supposed to measure hostility towards traditional views on family? What does that even mean?" ([03:34])
Behavior vs. Ideology:
Scope and Mechanism:
"...far right attacks from white supremacists outpace all other forms of domestic violence. And what a surprise that was deleted from the department’s website back in September..." ([06:54])
“The memoir expressly seeks to define political dissent against the President as domestic terrorism." - Chief Legal Counsel for Whistleblower Aid ([07:42])
Encouraging Snitching:
Financial Harassment:
Sentencing Skew:
“You don’t need a law that says you’re guilty of domestic terrorism because there isn’t one. Prosecutors just have to convince a judge...” ([10:04])
Sidestepping Due Process:
Fear and Obedience:
"The fear is designed to make people obey in advance. That sound familiar? Obey in advance." ([11:43])
Unprecedented Executive Power:
“Trump is building this powerful domestic counterterrorism apparatus without congressional approval. And they filled it with very specific ideological criteria.” ([12:07])
"The memo's language essentially builds a composite culture, war, enemy. It shifts the entire focus from what illegal things you might be planning to what political ideas you might have."
— Charlie Sykes ([02:47])
“How's an FBI agent or a local cop supposed to measure hostility towards traditional views on family? What does that even mean?”
— Charlie Sykes ([03:34])
“This shift from behavior to ideology is the biggest change. It's the single most alarming feature of the whole thing.”
— Charlie Sykes ([03:47])
“DOJ can just say, oh, we're just targeting criminal acts by individuals. But operationally they're treating the ideology as a structured threat, which allows for much broader intelligence collection.”
— Charlie Sykes ([05:58])
“It weaponizes cultural debates, turns them into grounds for a federal investigation.”
— Charlie Sykes ([07:52])
“Bondi's memo authorizes witnesses and so called citizen journalists to send in media of things they think are suspicious. And there's a cash reward system...”
— Charlie Sykes ([08:11])
“And now we get to the genuinely scary part. Yeah, there's more. This list, this internal list, is directly linked to the terrorism sentencing enhancement.”
— Charlie Sykes ([09:52])
"It creates a secret domestic terror list that Congress never approved. And Congress deliberately avoided creating a designation system because of these First Amendment issues."
— Charlie Sykes ([10:44])
“The chilling effect, because the network mapping logic means that even being adjacent to those ideas can be dangerous. Like donating 50 bucks to a legal defense fund that's ending a peaceful protest.”
— Charlie Sykes ([11:19])
“If that terrifies you, you are not the crazy ones.”
— Charlie Sykes ([12:27])
Charlie Sykes paints a chilling portrait of a domestic security framework being constructed under the guise of public safety but designed to chill, silence, and punish dissent. By embedding subjective and ideologically loaded definitions of “domestic terrorism” into law enforcement directives—and connecting those to enhanced surveillance, secret blacklists, and draconian sentences—the government is, he argues, not just fighting extremism, but fundamentally altering the boundaries of American political life.
“If that terrifies you, you are not the crazy ones.” (Charlie Sykes, [12:27])