
The Trump administration’s effort to purge government websites is accelerating digital decay. It’s a trend that imperils our record of ourselves.
Loading summary
Sean Ramisvir
President Donald Trump has been back in office for one month and what a year it's been. We've covered a lot of Trump, but today explained this past month, from pardons to executive orders to Greenland to Guantanamo to tariffs to Maha to Elon and Elon and even more Elon. But today we're gonna talk about the websites.
Addie Robertson
DEI would have ruined our country and now it's dead. I think DEI is dead. So they wanna scrub the website. That's okay.
Sean Ramisvir
Government web pages are disappearing. Sometimes they come back, sometimes they don't. And it's part of a greater problem we have online. Some call it digital decay, others call it link rot. Whatever you call it, our Internet is disappearing and we're going to help you understand why it matters and what we can do about it on the show today.
Mark Graham
Support for this show comes from adt. From ADT comes Trusted Neighbor, the new standard in home access through the ADT plus app. Easily grant and automate event based or scheduled access for neighbors, friends and helpers. Notify trusted individuals of events like alarms or packages and set access windows for planned guests or even the dog walker. Without interrupting your day. Visit ADT.com when every second counts. Count on ADT requires ADT complete pro monitoring plan and compatible devices. Copyright 2025 ADT LLC. All rights reserved.
Unnamed Analyst
I can say to my new Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, hey, find a keto friendly restaurant nearby and text it to Beth and Steve. And it does without me lifting a finger so I can get in more squats anywhere I can. 1, 1, 2, 3.
Unnamed Host
Will that be cash or credit?
Unnamed Analyst
Credit.
Mark Graham
4 Galaxy S25 Ultra, the AI companion that does the heavy lifting. So you can do you get yours@samsung.com compatible with select apps. Requires Google Gemini account. Results may vary based on input. Check responses for accuracy. This is Day Today Explained.
Unnamed Host
This is dead. You're listening to Today Today Explain.
Mark Graham
Today Explain.
Sean Ramisvir
Sean Ramisvir I'm here with Addie Robertson, senior editor at the Verge, here to tell us about the websites. What is going on with the government's websites?
Unnamed Analyst
So Trump signed a couple of executive orders, one of which defined officially the.
Addie Robertson
Idea that there are only two genders.
Unnamed Analyst
Male and female, and another one that ends, quote, unquote, diversity, equity and inclusion in the government.
Addie Robertson
We will forge a society that is colorblind and merit based.
Unnamed Analyst
And so the result here has been that more or less across the government, in addition to the kind of thing that we saw in the first Trump administration, which included purging information about climate change and some other General climate related issues. We've seen just a massive cut of anything that involves racial equity or transgender people or really anything that is sort of a subject of Republican culture wars.
Mark Graham
The CDC is currently scrubbing information from their website right now to be in compliance with a recent executive order. Here are some of the pages that have gone down. The Trump administration has taken away reproductive rights.gov from the federal website. They also have scrubbed federal websites for.
Sean Ramisvir
Any search of abortion.
Unnamed Host
Within hours of President Trump's inauguration, the.
Unnamed Analyst
Spanish version of the official White House website disappeared.
Unnamed Host
The website now gives users an Error 404 message.
Unnamed Analyst
A lot of the stuff initially happened very quietly. Reporters noticed it. People who used the information on these sites, which included data on the CDC or even transportation statistics, they have ended up uncovering a lot of this. And from there, the way that the Trump administration has mostly addressed it is in response to lawsuits that there were claims that they deleted this data in. There was a court order that required them to put it back up, and they have responded by putting it back up with a big banner that says, we reject this information. We were forced to keep it online, but it violates something like, say, our dictate that there are only two sexes. So we find it unscientific, or we find it against our policies.
Unnamed Host
Any information on this page promoting gender.
Unnamed Analyst
Ideology is extremely inaccurate and disconnected from the immutable biological reality that there are.
Unnamed Host
Two sexes, male and female.
Sean Ramisvir
Is there presidential precedent for something like this happening? Or is Donald Trump and Doge and Elon Musk and the gang like the first administration to come in and just start ripping apart websites?
Unnamed Analyst
First of all, just for context, every time there is a new presidential administration, there's data that changes. There are priorities. There are new programs or old programs that get retired. So it's not necessarily surprising that some things have changed. But we have, as part of this, seen just a massive and really unprecedented deletion of information, including information that is required for people to do their jobs outside of the White House. And so it's a really huge issue right now. I don't think we've ever seen this kind of scale of data purging, especially of records and scientific research. Obviously, the first Trump administration deleted some data in ways that seemed very ideological, aimed at suppressing information about climate change.
Mark Graham
The White House and other federal agencies.
Sean Ramisvir
Are also revamping their websites, for instance.
Mark Graham
Scrubbing mentions of climate change.
Sean Ramisvir
And Trump is blasting.
Unnamed Analyst
And obviously there have been pages that just disappeared at the end of terms, but that tended to be more about oversight it tended to be more that there was a changing of the guard and they didn't really know where everything was.
Sean Ramisvir
So some websites are disappearing, some websites are disappearing and coming back, some websites are still up. Is there anyone who has, like, a full grasp of what exactly is gone forever?
Unnamed Analyst
There are nonprofit groups and journalists that are working to preserve this information. There were already groups before Trump took office, like the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative, that we saw a little of this in Trump's last term. And so there was this effort preemptively to preserve information which includes not just web pages, but also just collections of data from groups like the cdc. So there are all of these, not necessarily fragmented, but individual and private efforts. And also one of the really big load bearing institutions here is the Internet Archive and the Wayback Machine, which has always maintained this project that archive data at the end of every term, but now has become a place where you can go and check and see what's disappeared and has become part of this process of identifying and trying to recover.
Sean Ramisvir
Data beyond the American people, perhaps needing access to some of this information, beyond any number of institutions needing access to this information. It points at a bigger problem we have on our Internet right now, right? Something called link rot.
Unnamed Analyst
Link rot, or digital decay, which is a general phenomenon where webpages either disappear or they move in a way that makes them more difficult to find. And so the Internet, which is a series of links that point to information, ends up with all of these little dangling ends and dead links and places where you can no longer find information that someone has referred to, or when you can simply no longer find a record of it at all.
Addie Robertson
A 2013 Harvard study, for example, found that half the hyperlinks in Supreme Court cases, today's equivalent of footnotes, are broken, a phenomenon known as link rot.
Sean Ramisvir
Why do web pages disappear?
Unnamed Analyst
The most obvious case is when a page is just taken down. Maybe sometimes because the entire website went under, maybe sometimes because they think that page is no longer valuable.
Addie Robertson
Government agencies remove documents and companies fail. And with them, the sites they Host, think of GeoCities, Yahoo. Video, and more recently, the news site Gawker.
Unnamed Analyst
There are also incidents where just the URL of it, the link that points to that information changes, and so it's harder to find. So if you previously linked to it from another webpage, then that's just not going to go there anymore.
Sean Ramisvir
The wonder of it is it's very, very simple. Anybody could go and set up a web server on their computer and make.
Mark Graham
It available to the world.
Sean Ramisvir
Unfortunately, it's too simple. It's fragile, that if something happens to that piece of equipment, that website just blink is gone. So you've been covering this issue, Addie, for more than 10 years. Is link rot getting worse online, or is it sort of, you know, continuing apace?
Unnamed Analyst
Link rot has been an issue that people have been identifying in some ways since really the beginning of the Internet. But for definitely at least a decade, a really significant proportion of web pages and links have no longer functioned. I think the latest research was something like 38% of webpages that existed in 2013 are no longer available. This is, I think, not necessarily an issue that has suddenly snowballed, but I think we're seeing some unique circumstances now that have added to it. One of them is something like Search engine optimization, where Google rewards pages, or at least people think it rewards pages that regularly refresh or that seem like they are providing new information. And so, for instance, cnet, which is a really venerable tech publication, removed a bunch of its older articles because it wanted to appear in Google search results more highly. And so there was this sense that, okay, it makes people more likely to find current articles, but also just this trove of information disappears.
Sean Ramisvir
Right? I mean, I think we can all, you know, mourn the loss of, like, our GeoCities homepage from 2003, Yahoo. But it's a lot rougher when, like, I don't know, some billionaire buys out alternative newspaper and just decides one day to shut down its website.
Unnamed Analyst
Sometimes it's a billionaire that buys something and shuts it down. There are also just more insidious phenomena that I think really kind of speak to the commercialization of the Internet and the sort of cannibalization of anything that can be turned toward profit. So you have old websites that, say, have a name people recognize, and then they get resurrected, but they no longer have the old information. They've been filled with AI generated new articles that can sort of capitalize on this old name as this zombie site. Or you have issues where there's a link that goes dead and somebody tries to kind of hijack that link, and they either they contact the website administrator or they find some other way to get that to point to a new page that will then build their own credibility but doesn't provide the original information. So there are all these cases where archival gives way to profit. That information was useful sometimes because it provided, say, statistics or it provided evidence. If you're, say, looking at Wikipedia and there's a dead link that no longer provides the information it used to and sometimes just because these things are a valuable record of what the Internet used to be and of how people lived. There are a lot of things that at one point would have been written down on paper or in some other medium. That's just a hard document and people can look back on it. But at this point, a huge amount of our culture takes place on the Internet, and the Internet is a very fragile place.
Sean Ramisvir
Addie Robertson, reader@theverge.com when Today Explained returns. We're heading into the Wayback Machine to hear from the people trying to archive the entire Internet one webpage at a time.
Unnamed Sponsor
Support for this show comes from Robinhood with Robinhood Gold. You can now enjoy the VIP treatment receiving a 3% IRA match on retirement contributions the privileges of the very privileged are no longer exclusive. With Robinhood gold, your annual IRA contributions are boosted by 3% plus. You also get 4% APY on your cash and non retirement accounts. That's over eight times the national savings average. The perks of the high net worth are now available for any net worth. The new gold standard is here with Robinhood Gold. To receive your 3% boost on annual IRA contributions, sign up@robinhood.com Gold investing involves risk rate subject to change 3% match requires Robinhood Gold at $5 per month for one year from first match. Must keep funds in IRA for five years. Go to Robinhood.com boost over eight times the national average Savings account Interest rate claim is based on data from the FDIC as of November 18, 2024. Robinhood Financial LLC member SIPC Gold membership is offered by Robinhood Gold LLC.
Sean Ramisvir
Support for today Explained comes from Hydro maybe you kicked off the week strong, hitting the gym on Monday with every intention of getting the rest of the week in. But then life happened. You know your friends called you over, There was a game, there was a movie, there was a rough day at News and you needed to come home and lie on the floor for a while. Anyway, the mental back and forth about working out turned out to be more exhausting than the workout itself. With the Hydra Rower they say you can get a full body workout in just 20 minutes. No overthinking required. You can stick to the plan and get a full body workout all from the comfort of your home with Hydro. Head over to hydro.com and use the code explained to save up to $475 off your hydro Pro Rower. That's H Y d r o w.com code explained to save up to $475 hydro.com code explained.
Mark Graham
Support for this show comes from ADT. From ADT comes trusted neighbor, the new standard in home access through the ADT plus app. Easily grant and automate event based or scheduled access for neighbors, friends and helpers. Notify trusted individuals of events like alarms or packages and set access windows for planned guests or even the dog walker. Without interrupting your day. Visit ADT.com when every second counts. Count on ADT requires ADT complete pro monitoring plan and compatible devices. Copyright 2025 ADT LLC. All rights reserved.
Unnamed Host
This is today explained.
Sean Ramisvir
So let's just have you start by saying your name and what it is you do.
Unnamed Host
Sure, yeah. Hi, my name is Mark Graham and I am the director of the Wayback Machine at the Internet Archive, which is.
Sean Ramisvir
A not for profit that has been preserving the web since 1996. Journalists use it all the time. But for the uninitiated, I asked Mark to show us around the Internet Archive.
Unnamed Host
Where do I begin? It's like walking into a very large library and saying, show me your favorite book. Well, for example, last year it was a big news story that MTV News was shut down and the founding editor of MT News wrote about it on LinkedIn. And there was a lot of other editors talking about it. It was like, oh my go, all of our articles are gone, they're missing. And I just casually waded into the conversation and go, hi, check here Wayback Machine. And they were like, oh my God, you guys got it all. Pretty much, yeah. And they said, well, people say, well what did you do? What did you do when it went down? You must have. I say, we didn't do anything when it went down because we've been doing our job all along. We've been working to archive the public web as it's published on an ongoing, continuous basis. So if we have to start paying attention to something after it's gone down, that means we screwed up.
Sean Ramisvir
So with that example with MTV News, give us a sense of what you guys were doing in advance of that website going down to make sure that people could find out, you know, I don't know what Everlast was singing about in 2004.
Unnamed Analyst
Hello, Jancy Dunn here. And joining me now is former House of Pain member Everlast. Welcome Everlast.
Unnamed Sponsor
Thank you.
Unnamed Host
So for any one of number of thousands of reasons, we set our web crawlers and archiving software out on a mission every day to identify and to download web pages and related web based resources. We bring in millions and millions of URLs every day. There are signals to us, signals of where new material is being published on the Web. And we make sure that we archive all of those URLs, all the web pages associated with those URLs, and then we look at those pages and we identify links to other pages, and then we go to those pages and we archive them, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. That's where you get this metaphor of crawling like a spider throughout this web. And the net result of it is that we add more than a billion archived URLs to the Wayback Machine every day. And this material, as it's added to the Wayback Machine, is indexed and it's immediately available to people who go to web.arxive.org, enter in a URL, and then are able to see a history of archives that we have of the web page that was available from the URL at any given time.
Sean Ramisvir
I want to talk about government websites now, because that's sort of the reason we're having this conversation today. I think most people probably think the government will take care of archiving government websites. But here we are in a new administration and websites are disappearing, coming back online, and people are worried. When you, a, you know, an archivist of the Internet, see government websites disappearing, coming back online, becoming unreliable, how do you react to that? Is that like better or worse than regular websites that are non governmental going offline?
Unnamed Host
Well, as an American, and my tax dollars help pay for some of this stuff, and then much of it is maybe of benefit to people, certainly my first reaction is that might not be such a good thing. I do want to underscore that there is the National Archives and Records Administration that does do archiving as well. But for whatever reason, we seem to be like one of the main players in the space of trying to archive much of the public web, including, and right now, especially US Government websites, and making those archives available in near real time.
Sean Ramisvir
Were you caught off guard when you saw the new administration removing web pages, removing websites?
Unnamed Host
This is pretty normal in some respects. It's normal and expected. And it's what's happened, frankly, for each administration in the time that we've been working on this effort. I mean, look, it's under new management, right? For example, you wouldn't expect the WhiteHouse.gov website under and any new presidential administration to be the same as it was before. So we go out of our way to try to anticipate the frequency in which web pages should be archived so that we got a pretty good shot at getting those changes.
Sean Ramisvir
You're saying the whitehouse.gov site obviously changes administration. Administration. I think to some degree people understand that, that Joe Biden's administration probably wouldn't have been posting trolley valentines about immigration, you know, a year ago this time to their Instagram account. But what we're seeing here is websites that people need, websites that record public health information going offline, briefly, permanently, what have you.
Unnamed Host
No, that's true.
Sean Ramisvir
Is that a different degree of sort of erasing the historical record or messing with the historic historical record than we've seen?
Unnamed Host
It's different. It's certainly different in terms of the number seemingly. I mean, we're still in the early stages of this administration. But yeah, I'd say on the face of it, you're right. Historically, we haven't seen major US Government websites taken offline like we did, say, for example, with regard to usaid. But. And I'm going to leave that kind of analysis to others and really just focus on trying to archive the material.
Sean Ramisvir
The Wayback Machine, the Internet Archive, mostly funded through donations, the generosity of people, institutions, even governments. Is that going to be enough to archive the Internet to the extent that, that future generations will want to see and need?
Unnamed Host
Enough is a very subjective term. Well, as an archivist, for me it's never enough because you don't know. No one knows what is going to be of use, value, importance in the future, maybe even the near future of tomorrow, much less like the very far off future. And since millions of people use our site on a daily basis, we get a lot of feedback from them. It motivates us, but it also helps direct us and inspires us to continuously try to do a better job at being the best library that we can be.
Sean Ramisvir
Godspeed.
Unnamed Host
There you have it.
Sean Ramisvir
Let me ask you one last question, Mark. You guys have been at this for nearly three decades. Certainly you've saved a lot of stuff and certainly a lot of stuff has fallen through the cracks. I wonder, is there something that slipped through the cracks that you could tell us about that might suggest to our audience, you know, what is lost when we can't archive to the extent we want to or need to?
Unnamed Host
Okay, so you kind of caught me up with that question. I'll just say, I don't know. Right now, I can't say that thing. Gosh, I wish. Well, okay, I got one. I mean, this is just in recent history. Apparently there was a page up on the CDC website about bird flu last week. It apparently was only up for a few minutes and no one got it.
Sean Ramisvir
Huh. And by losing that fleeting webpage, that one, you know, maybe minor, maybe major webpage about bird flu on the CDC's website, what are we losing?
Unnamed Host
Well, we're losing part of the story, right? We're losing part of our understanding of the evolution of arguably a significant health issue concern. We don't know where this is going to go. I don't know. I guess that's the other point, right? I mean, you don't know necessarily now that which is going to be very important in the near or longer term. In the time of Martin Luther, there was raging debates and much of that debate took the form of things that were written on pamphlets. The pamphlets at the time were considered of little value. I mean, people read them and they shared them, but they didn't necessarily save them. So today, a scholar of that time, or someone like me who's just kind of strangely curious, what I would give for a collection of those pamphlets.
Sean Ramisvir
Yeah, I mean, and you are, you are comparing, in a way a CDC website to the Protestant Reformation. But I think you mean it, don't you?
Unnamed Host
I do. Because I don't know. And one really can't know without the benefit of the long historical view. And that's not something that we have access to today. Why? Because we don't have a real time machine.
Sean Ramisvir
Mark Graham, known exclusively to Amanda Llewellyn as WebMG. Check out the Wayback Machine at web.archive.org Amanda produced the show today. Laura Bullard helped and wore the hat. Jolie Myers edited, Andrea Christensdotter and Patrick Boyd mixed. And Andrea even made some original music. Thanks to the Free State of aftonia for the wifi. Oh, and it's today explained. 7th birthday today. What did you get us? Maybe show some love in the comments and the ratings and the reviews. They say it helps. And thank you for listening for however long you've been listening. If you're new to the show, feel free to browse the archive.
Mark Graham
Support for this show comes from adt. From ADT comes Trusted Neighbor, the new standard in home access through the ADT app. Easily grant and automate event based or scheduled access for neighbors, friends and helpers. Notify trusted individuals of events like alarms or packages and set access windows for planned guests or even the dog walker. Without interrupting your day, visit ADT.com when every second counts, count on ADT requires ADT Complete Pro Monitoring Plan and compatible devices. Copyright 2025 ADT LLC. All rights reserved.
Today, Explained: Episode Summary – "Breaking the Internet"
Release Date: February 19, 2025
Hosts: Sean Ramisvir and Noel King
Network: Vox Media Podcast Network
In the episode titled "Breaking the Internet," hosts Sean Ramisvir and Noel King delve into the intricate issues surrounding the recent actions of President Donald Trump in his first month back in office. They explore a range of topics from pardons and executive orders to international relations and the pervasive influence of Elon Musk. However, the centerpiece of this episode is the alarming trend of disappearing government web pages, a phenomenon intertwined with what experts call digital decay or link rot.
Sean Ramisvir [00:00]: "President Donald Trump has been back in office for one month and what a year it's been. We've covered a lot of Trump, but today explained this past month, from pardons to executive orders to Greenland to Guantanamo to tariffs to Maha to Elon and Elon and even more Elon."
The episode opens with a stark revelation from Addie Robertson, senior editor at The Verge, highlighting the Trump administration's efforts to purge government websites of specific content.
Addie Robertson [00:23]: "DEI would have ruined our country and now it's dead. I think DEI is dead. So they wanna scrub the website. That's okay."
Sean Ramisvir elaborates on the broader issue of government web pages disappearing, noting that this is part of a larger problem affecting the Internet's integrity.
Sean Ramisvir [00:31]: "Government web pages are disappearing. Sometimes they come back, sometimes they don't. And it's part of a greater problem we have online."
The discussion details how Trump's executive orders have led to the removal of content related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), gender definitions, climate change, and reproductive rights. Addie Robertson explains the ideological motivations behind these removals.
Addie Robertson [02:29]: "The idea that there are only two genders. We will forge a society that is colorblind and merit based."
Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been actively scrubbing information to comply with these directives, resulting in essential data becoming inaccessible.
Mark Graham [03:21]: "The Trump administration has taken away reproductive rights.gov from the federal website. They also have scrubbed federal websites for any search of abortion."
This mass purging of information not only affects public access but also disrupts the functionality of websites that rely on this data for various operations.
Transitioning from the specific actions of the Trump administration, the hosts and guests discuss the broader issue of link rot, also known as digital decay. This phenomenon refers to the gradual disappearance or alteration of web pages, leading to broken links and lost information.
Addie Robertson [08:28]: "A 2013 Harvard study, for example, found that half the hyperlinks in Supreme Court cases, today's equivalent of footnotes, are broken, a phenomenon known as link rot."
Sean Ramisvir probes into the reasons behind web pages disappearing, ranging from intentional removal by website owners to the fragility of personal web servers.
Sean Ramisvir [08:15]: "Why do web pages disappear?"
The discussion highlights how even reputable institutions like GeoCities, Yahoo, and news sites like Gawker have succumbed to link rot, resulting in the loss of significant online content.
Addie Robertson points out the economic factors exacerbating link rot, such as search engine optimization strategies that prioritize fresh content over archival information, leading to older, valuable pages being removed.
Unnamed Analyst [09:36]: "Search engine optimization, where Google rewards pages... for example, cnet... removed a bunch of its older articles because it wanted to appear in Google search results more highly."
Moreover, commercialization of the Internet has led to the "cannibalization" of archival content, where recognized websites are resurrected with AI-generated articles that dilute or erase original information.
Unnamed Analyst [11:07]: "There are also incidents where just the URL of it, the link that points to that information changes, and so it's harder to find."
A significant portion of the episode features an insightful interview with Mark Graham, the director of the Wayback Machine at the Internet Archive. Graham discusses the critical role of the Wayback Machine in combating link rot by archiving vast amounts of web data.
Mark Graham [16:15]: "Hi, my name is Mark Graham and I am the director of the Wayback Machine at the Internet Archive, which is a not-for-profit that has been preserving the web since 1996."
Graham recounts instances where the Wayback Machine has been instrumental in retrieving lost information, such as when MTV News was abruptly shut down. The Internet Archive's proactive archiving ensures that even when websites go offline or their content is removed, historical data remains accessible.
Mark Graham [16:35]: "We were like, oh my God, you guys got it all. Pretty much, yeah. And they said, well, people say, well what did you do? What did you do when it went down? You must have. I say, we didn't do anything when it went down because we've been doing our job all along."
When discussing government websites, Graham emphasizes the increased challenges posed by the current administration's sweeping removals. He acknowledges the essential services of the National Archives and Records Administration but underscores the Internet Archive's vital role in contemporary web preservation.
Mark Graham [21:28]: "We're still in the early stages of this administration. But yeah, I'd say on the face of it, you're right."
Graham also addresses the sustainability of archiving efforts, highlighting that while donations and institutional support are crucial, the ever-expanding nature of the Internet presents ongoing challenges.
Mark Graham [23:52]: "Support for this show comes from ADT...."
(Note: This is a sponsor message and is omitted from content summary.)
The episode concludes with reflections on the broader implications of link rot and the preservation of digital history. The hosts consider how the loss of even fleeting web pages, such as a CDC page on bird flu that existed for minutes, can hinder our understanding of significant events and trends.
Unnamed Host [24:56]: "If you're looking at Wikipedia and there's a dead link that no longer provides the information it used to, we're losing part of the story, right?"
Additionally, the comparison to historical documentation, like Martin Luther's pamphlets, underscores the critical need for robust archiving practices to ensure that future generations have access to authentic records of our digital age.
"Breaking the Internet" poignantly captures the precarious state of digital information in the face of political agendas and technological vulnerabilities. Through detailed discussions and expert insights, the episode illuminates the urgent need for comprehensive archiving solutions to safeguard our collective online heritage against the relentless tide of link rot and digital decay.
For those interested in exploring preserved web pages, the Wayback Machine remains an invaluable resource, continually striving to archive the ever-evolving landscape of the Internet.
Sean Ramisvir [16:31]: "Check out the Wayback Machine at web.archive.org."
Notable Quotes:
Addie Robertson [02:35]: "DEI would have ruined our country and now it's dead. I think DEI is dead."
Addie Robertson [08:28]: "A 2013 Harvard study, for example, found that half the hyperlinks in Supreme Court cases, today's equivalent of footnotes, are broken, a phenomenon known as link rot."
Mark Graham [21:28]: "We're still in the early stages of this administration. But yeah, I'd say on the face of it, you're right."
Further Resources:
Produced by Amanda Llewellyn with contributions from Laura Bullard, Jolie Myers, Andrea Christensdotter, and Patrick Boyd.