Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill”

Summary

Today, Explained: Donald Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill”

Episode Release Date: May 21, 2025
Hosts: Sean Rameswaram and Noel King
Produced by Vox.

---

Introduction

In this episode of Today, Explained, hosts Sean Rameswaram and Noel King delve into President Donald Trump’s ambitious legislative proposal dubbed the “Big, Beautiful Bill” (BBB). This comprehensive bill aims to consolidate various policy initiatives, from tax cuts to immigration and social welfare programs, into a single legislative package. The episode explores the motivations behind the bill, the internal conflicts within the Republican Party, and the potential implications for Congress and upcoming elections.

---

Overview of the Big, Beautiful Bill

Sean Rameswaram opens the discussion by highlighting President Trump’s strategy to maximize his influence by embedding multiple policy changes into one expansive bill.

“[00:00] Sean Rameswaram: The time has finally come for President Trump to work with Congress, and he's trying to make it count by cramming everything he can into one bill.”

Key components of the BBB include:

• Extension of the 2017 Trump Tax Cuts: President Trump seeks to prolong the tax cuts introduced in his previous administration.

• Tax Reforms:

  • No Tax on Tips and Overtime: As stated by Trump, “I’m calling for no tax on tips, no tax on overtime” ([00:15], Donald Trump).

• Social Welfare Adjustments:

  • Medicaid and Medicare Reforms: Criticism arises that some Medicaid beneficiaries are receiving more than those on Medicare, prompting calls for restructuring ([00:19] Jonathan Martin).

• Border Security Enhancements:

  • Funding for Border Security Personnel: Full funding for an increase in border security personnel and retention bonuses for ICE and Border Patrol agents ([00:26], Donald Trump).

• Child Tax Credit:

  • Increase to $2,500 per Child: Enhancement of the child tax credit to support families.

• Savings Accounts for Newborns:

  • $1,000 Credit for Newborn Savings Accounts: Establishment of optional savings accounts with tax credits for newborns.

• Paid Family Leave: Strengthening of policies to support paid family leave for workers ([00:33] Jonathan Martin).

Trump enthusiastically refers to this legislative package as the “Big, Beautiful Bill,” aiming to showcase its comprehensive nature.

“[00:45] Sean Rameswaram: Trump's calling this package, we call it.”

However, despite its grand vision, the BBB faces resistance within Trump's own party, particularly from Republicans who are concerned about specific provisions.

---

Internal Republican Conflicts: Medicaid and SALT Deductions

The episode delves into the primary points of contention among Republicans regarding the BBB: Medicaid reforms and the State and Local Tax (SALT) deductions.

Medicaid Reforms

Burgess Everett, Semafor’s congressional bureau chief, provides an in-depth analysis of the Medicaid-related disputes:

“[03:38] Burgess Everett: Yeah, I think, I think it's the biggest one...”

Key Issues:

• Co-pays for Medicaid Expansion: Introduction of co-pays for Medicaid beneficiaries.

• Provider Tax: Mechanism for states to receive more federal funding through taxation.

• Work Requirements: Mandating proof of employment for Medicaid eligibility.

• Citizenship Verification: Requiring documentation to prove citizenship for Medicaid benefits.

These changes are perceived by some Senate Republicans as potential benefit cuts, leading to significant pushback.

Notable Quote on Medicaid Issues:

“[06:08] Donald Trump: Here's what I want on Medicaid. We're not touching anything. All I want is one thing, three words. We don't want any waste, fraud or abuse. Very simple. Waste, fraud, abuse.”

Despite Trump’s assertion, the intricate details of the proposed Medicaid reforms suggest substantial coverage reductions, which many Republicans find unacceptable.

SALT Deductions

The SALT deduction has emerged as a critical battleground, especially for Republicans representing high-tax, typically blue states like New York, New Jersey, and California.

Jonathan Martin explains the divide:

“[12:42] Jonathan Martin: So here's the salt part. This is the longtime write off for state and local taxes that people could do on their federal taxes...”

Key Points:

• Impact on High-Tax States: Removal of the SALT deduction disproportionately affects residents of high-tax states, who benefit significantly from this provision.

• Intra-Party Tensions: Republicans from affluent, blue states oppose rolling back the SALT deduction, leading to friction with their rural, low-tax counterparts who support the change.

Notable Quote on SALT Issue:

“[16:40] Donald Trump: This is the biggest tax cut in the history of our country, or you'll get a 68% tax increase...”

Trump’s stance shifts between supporting and opposing the SALT deduction, reflecting the ongoing internal struggle within the party.

---

Political Implications and Legislative Challenges

The BBB's chances of passage are clouded by the need for bipartisan support and reconciliation between the House and Senate versions of the bill.

Burgess Everett outlines the legislative hurdles:

“[07:54] Burgess Everett: I think they need to figure out whether they need to take more time with it and get it as close as they can to how they think it could become law or do they need to say, we have argued about this enough...”

Key Challenges:

• Bipartisan Negotiations: Differences between the House and Senate require extensive negotiations, potentially delaying the bill’s progress.

• Debt Ceiling Deadline: The inclusion of a debt ceiling increase in the BBB introduces a critical deadline of December 31st, adding pressure for timely passage to avoid a default.

Notable Quote on Legislative Strategy:

“[03:11] Burgess Everett: As an attempt to sort of say, hey, forget all that, just pass something now so that the Senate can take this up...”

President Trump’s visit to Congress underscores his impatience and desire for swift legislative action, aiming to secure momentum for future policies.

---

Impact on Republican Party Dynamics

The debate over the BBB highlights a significant realignment within the Republican Party, revealing deep-seated divisions based on regional, economic, and cultural lines.

Jonathan Martin discusses the evolving Republican coalition:

“[19:10] Jonathan Martin: It tells us that this party is much more oriented around working class voters in rural red America...”

Key Insights:

• Shift Towards Rural and Working-Class Constituency: The party is increasingly representing rural, working-class voters, diverging from its previous coalition that included affluent, suburban members.

• Class and Regional Divides: High-income, blue-state Republicans feel alienated by policies like cutting the SALT deduction, which do not resonate with their constituencies.

• Policy vs. Party Identity: The struggle to align diverse policy preferences with a unified party identity threatens the coherence and electoral viability of the Republican Party.

---

Tentative Resolution on SALT Deductions

Amidst the ongoing debates, a tentative agreement emerges to raise the SALT deduction limit to $40,000, aiming to placate representatives from high-tax states and facilitate the bill's progression.

“[23:35] Sean Rameswaram: ...we got news that Mike Johnson and his fellow Republicans had reached a tentative deal on salt. Apparently they agreed to raise the limit on state and local tax deductions to $40,000.”

This compromise reflects the intricate balancing act required to unify the diverse factions within the Republican Party, though the overall success of the BBB remains uncertain.

---

Conclusion

The “Big, Beautiful Bill” epitomizes President Trump’s legislative ambitions and the complexities of modern American politics. As Republicans navigate internal divisions over Medicaid reforms and SALT deductions, the BBB serves as a litmus test for the party's ability to reconcile differing regional interests and policy priorities. The outcome of this legislative effort will have profound implications for the Republican Party's future direction and its standing in upcoming elections.

---

Notable Quotes with Timestamps

• Sean Rameswaram: “[00:00] The time has finally come for President Trump to work with Congress...”

• Donald Trump: “[00:15] I'm calling for no tax on tips, no tax on overtime.”

• Burgess Everett: “[03:38] Yeah, I think, I think it's the biggest one...”

• Donald Trump: “[06:08] Here's what I want on Medicaid... Waste, fraud, abuse.”

• Jonathan Martin: “[12:42] So here's the salt part...”

• Jonathan Martin: “[19:10] It tells us that this party is much more oriented around working class voters in rural red America...”

• Donald Trump: “[16:40] This is the biggest tax cut in the history of our country...”

---

Further Coverage

Stay tuned for ongoing updates as the BBB progresses through Congress and as further negotiations shape its final form. Future episodes will continue to track the developments surrounding this pivotal legislative effort.

---

Produced by Devin Schwartz with contributions from Hadima Wagdi, Amna Al Saadi, Laura Bullard, Andrea Christensdotter, and Patrick Boyd.

Transcript

[Sean Ramisvir]

The time has finally come for President Trump to work with Congress, and he's trying to make it count by cramming everything he can into one bill.

[Jonathan Martin]

One of the most important elements in.

[Burgess Everett]

This package will be extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts.

[Donald Trump]

I'm calling for no tax on tips, no tax on overtime.

[Jonathan Martin]

You shouldn't be having people on Medicaid getting more than Medicare.

[Burgess Everett]

You shouldn't be having the people who.

[Jonathan Martin]

Should work can work getting benefits without working.

[Donald Trump]

This should include full funding for a record increase in border security personnel and retention bonuses for ICE and Border Patrol.

[Jonathan Martin]

It will increase the child tax credit to $2,500 per child, establish optional savings account for newborn babies with a $1,000 credit added, and strengthen paid family leave.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Trump's calling this package, we call it.

[Donald Trump]

The One big beautiful bill.

[Sean Ramisvir]

But if it's so beautiful, why is he having trouble convincing some of his fellow Republicans to vote for it? Answers on TODAY Explained Support for TODAY.

[WhatsApp Ad]

Explained comes from WhatsApp. Nobody likes having someone look over their shoulder when they're texting or listening in on their personal calls or peeking at their note to self. You deserve privacy in person and digitally, and WhatsApp gets that by design. No one, not even WhatsApp can see or hear your personal messages except the person you send them to. If someone tries to take a peek, all they'll see is gibberish. And that includes WhatsApp themselves. WhatsApp message privately with everyone. [e-mail] privacy to learn more. You're listening to TODAY Explained.

[Sean Ramisvir]

This isn't the first time we've seen Congress try to pass a BBB for my Build Back Betterness, we asked semafor's congressional bureau chief, Burgess Everett, if the acronym's where the similarities end.

[Burgess Everett]

No, I actually don't think so, because I think the reason both of these bills have experienced some turbulence is they just get too big. And it's hard to kind of give an underlying theory of the case of why you're doing it. Right. Ostensibly, this time, Republicans want to prevent tax rates from increasing at the end of the year. I think there's a very low chance that those tax rates will increase no matter what happens with this bill. And so I do think a lot of other Republicans recognize that. And so when you're now talking about Medicaid cuts, when you're now talking about food stamps and SNAP aid, when you're talking about defense spending, all of these new things, it's gotten tied up in what was kind of a singular priority. You also have Trump's tax, tax cuts that he talked about on the campaign that have become wrapped up in this as well. And so I think you can make an argument that putting all those things together offers sweeteners to people and more opportunities to get their votes. But I also think at some point the bill can become so big that each change to one part of the bill affects your folks on another side of the conference. And so we're seeing that play out in real time. And we're seeing Trump's Tuesday visit to the Hill.

[Donald Trump]

Who do you work for? Who?

[Burgess Everett]

Nurse.

[Donald Trump]

I don't even know what the hell that is.

[Burgess Everett]

As an attempt to sort of say, hey, forget all that, just pass something now so that the Senate can take this up and we can work together with them to pass a law and we'll see if that works. It's really a policy disagreement versus political sheer force of will that we're seeing from the president.

[Donald Trump]

America is back.

[Burgess Everett]

That's won out a lot in the past, but I don't think there's a guarantee that it wins out this time.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Medicaid is one of the biggest sticking points, is that not right?

[Burgess Everett]

Yeah, I think, I think it's the biggest one. I mean, I also think, I think there's two. And you hear a lot about salt. This state and local tax deduction. It's really a House blue state Republican issue. These folks want basically tax relief for their constituents who already pay high taxes.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Well, we're actually going to spend a bunch of time talking about SALT in the second half of the show. So why don't you tell us now a bit more about this fight and the drama around Medicaid.

[Burgess Everett]

So you have, you don't have the biggest changes that conservatives wanted to put in here. That was basically cutting the federal share of the Medicaid expansion or capping it in some way that was construed by a bunch of Senate Republicans as benefit cuts because it would probably lead to states providing less Medicaid expansion to their beneficiaries. So those are off the table. What you've ended up with is these co pays on some Medicaid expansion folks. There's going to be. And the provider tax, which is basically just a way that states use to get more federal funding. There's also work requirements for Medicaid expansion and you need to prove citizenship for the most part, although there may be some exceptions to that to get Medicaid benefits. So those are kind of like the core four things. I think there's pretty broad agreement on the Work requirements and the citizenship requirements. The other two issues have. I've just talking to some senators about this just now. The other two issues could be problematic. And I'm not sure Trump quite understands exactly what they would do. But plenty of Republicans think they would eventually amount to benefit cuts.

[Sean Ramisvir]

And even his Republican colleagues in the Senate are not entirely happy about this.

[Burgess Everett]

Correct. So the loudest person you're going to hear on this is Josh Hawley.

[Jonathan Martin]

It is wrong to cut health care for the working poor. And that's what we're talking about.

[Burgess Everett]

He's got an op ed in the New York Times. He'll tell you anyone that wants to listen to him, which is many people at this point because reporters love intra party drama, that he thinks this is a bad idea because a lot of Trump voters are on Medicaid.

[Jonathan Martin]

These are working people and their children who need health care. And it's just wrong to go and cut their health care when they're trying to make ends meet, trying to help their kids, trying to make sure that they're able to provide for their families.

[Burgess Everett]

And so his argument is that you're essentially cutting the benefits of your own voters and he thinks it's bad politics and he's trying to stop it.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Is, is Donald Trump hearing Josh Hawley's counterargument?

[Burgess Everett]

I think he is. Because you hear Trump talk about, you know, don't f around with Medicaid.

[Donald Trump]

Here's what I want on Medicaid. We're not touching anything. All I want is one thing, three words. We don't want any waste, fraud or abuse. Very simple. Waste, fraud, abuse. Other than that, we're leaving it.

[Burgess Everett]

So I mean the message is, is there and, and he's been pretty consistent on that. But not to use too much of a cliche, but the devil's in the detail. And when you look at the details of the proposed Medicaid changes, it would lead to widespread coverage losses, millions of coverage losses. I think Republicans are comfortable with the coverage losses from the work requirements. The question is whether they're comfortable with further coverage losses than that. And I think the answer right now is no.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Well then take us back to the House, which is at least for this moment, where all the action is. The President visited his pals Mike Johnson and the bunch on Tuesday. Was there any forward motion on this big so called beautiful bill?

[Burgess Everett]

I think on the vibes of the moment, yes. I think one thing that works pretty consistently is a shirts and skins exercise, which is the Democrats aren't going to help us. We need to be together as a team. The Democrats are loving that we're divided. Right. And so to the extent that he's building unity within his party, I think it was pretty effective. I've been looking at all the comments from these House members. The conservatives don't seem like they're swayed. And over here, I do think there's a Medicaid gap between what the House is doing and what the Senate is willing to do. So I don't see necessarily a ton of movement on those structural things, but I do think it did. It was a useful team building exercise, I think, for them to hear from.

[Sean Ramisvir]

The President for the moment. What do they need to figure out to get this thing moving up to the Senate?

[Burgess Everett]

I think they need to figure out whether they need to take more time with it and get it as close as they can to how they think it could become law or do they need to say, we have argued about this enough. Let's let these other folks argue about it and see if they can make this bill better and see what can pass the Senate. And then you may see another protracted negotiation between the two chambers of Congress if they end up on different pages, which is I think pretty likely at this point because the House seems like it might pass something that the Senate doesn't like, the Senate might pass something that the House doesn't like and then they might have to reconcile them. This could take months further. The biggest deadline is December 31st. I give that an asterisk because this also includes a debt ceiling increase in it, which is something we haven't even talked about, which is a really important thing. It's one of the hardest things to do on Capitol Hill and one of the most important things to do so that you don't, don't default on your debt. We already see credit ratings for our country are not as top notch as they used to be. That's in part because of these debt limit fights. And so we call it the X date on Capitol Hill, which is the last drop dead moment when they would need to pass a debt ceiling increase. And it looks like that's going to be late summer or early fall. So you could always bring that out of this big beautiful bill and pass it on its own. But as long as it's lumped in there, it does give you a little bit of a ticking time bomb of when this needs to pass.

[Sean Ramisvir]

You mentioned that this could take until December to figure out. This is our first time talking about the BBB on this program. I really hope we're not talking about it until December. But if we are, how frustrated will our president be?

[Burgess Everett]

I think very frustrated because I think the reason he's here this week, the reason he's taking time out of his schedule to come to Congress, not I mean, Joe Biden did it, but it's not something that happens every day. The reason he's doing that is he's impatient and he wants them to stop basically the circular firing squad stop spinning their wheels, move forward because ultimately it's not a great referendum on him if his signature piece of legislation is struggling to get through Congress. And so I think he wants a shot in the arm, momentum wise from this getting through the House. I would think they've learned their lesson from the Affordable Care act repeal and won't hold a big party at the White House after they pass the first version of this through the House because the Senate ultimately killed that bill. But I do think like this is a president who wants a legislative shot in the arm. There's only been a handful of new laws signed this Congress. I believe it's one of the least productive initial spurts for a new president in a long time. And so I think he wants to turn that around and he's doing it by lumping so many things into one bill. But if that one bill stalls, it doesn't look like there's much of a path for anything else to get through.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Burgess Everett will be covering whatever comes next for the big Beautiful [e-mail] Pass the salt next on today Explained.

[WhatsApp Ad]

Support for Today explained comes from WhatsApp. WhatsApp is committed to keeping users personal chats safe. The things you want most to keep private are indeed kept private, even from WhatsApp. Maybe it's where you message in character memes to your Dungeons and Dragons group, or it's where you share a detailed itinerary with your co worker who's planning a vacation in your home state. From everyday moments of connection to relationship milestones, WhatsApp is your go to for secure and private messaging. And that's because privacy is core to their design. That means no one, not even WhatsApp, can see or hear your personal messages. The only people who see your messages are the people you send them to. Whether it's personal calls, documents, photos or media that you share in your personal chat. No one's listening in. Not even WhatsApp, because all WhatsApp sees of your personal messages is gibberish. Your personal Messages stay yours. WhatsApp message privately with everyone visit WhatsApp.com privacy to learn more.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Today. Explain is back. I'm still Sean Ramisvir. I'm here with Jonathan Martin, who writes a column for Politico. Jonathan, we usually come to you for the tea, but today we're here for the salt.

[Jonathan Martin]

Well done. Well done.

[Sean Ramisvir]

What's going on? What's at the heart of this divide between the Republicans over this big beautiful bill? We've heard it essentially comes down to Medicaid and salt. We talked about Medicaid. We want to talk to you about salt. Why salt?

[Jonathan Martin]

So here's the salt part. This is the longtime write off for state and local taxes that people could do on their federal taxes. Now, Trump's 2017 tax bill, which expires at the end of this year, got rid of the salt deduction. And so this is something that is really problematic for folks in high income states, typically blue states, where they got people who are paying exorbitant amounts of money in local taxes, property taxes, state taxes. So where it gets much more sensitive, delicate, raw, is the kind of class and regional divide here within the Republican Party. This is an intra party fight. So the Republican Party has become a rural, heavily red state, heavily working class party. That's its coalition, but it has a narrow House majority. And the folks that come from a lot of the most marginal districts, kind of purple seats, tend to be from high income places like Jersey, New York and California. And yes, those are the folks that care the most about this issue. You're talking about giving back a tax deduction that the red moocher states took away. So my feeling is, why are we giving all these benefits to these red moocher states who take, take, take and expect the Northeast and states like mine, New Jersey to pay for them? And that's part of what's always been my issue. Why are you doubly taxing people in Jersey to pay for these moocher states that take so much from the federal government and barely pay anything in because the suburbs exurbs and even some rural areas of blue America, Jersey, California, New York most significantly do have a handful of Republican lawmakers. Now, the Last Trump midterm 2018, you know, was really brutal for that kind of suburban Republicans. There's not a ton ton out there. But the last two elections, 20 and 22, some folks have won back seats in places like Westchester County, New York, Orange County, California. And the Republicans who were right of center and whose voters give them a hell of a hard time every weekend about cost of living and taxes, I.

[Burgess Everett]

Look at it very Simply a district like mine, okay, just north of New York City. Three of the four counties that I represent are in the top 16 highest property tax counties in America. And so having an income cap of 400,000 would devastate so many families across my district. And I'm just not going to accept it. And so.

[Sean Ramisvir]

And what are Speaker Johnson and President Trump saying about salt?

[Burgess Everett]

I am convinced that we'll be able to adjust the dials, so to speak, so that we can come to an agreement that will, that will meet the criteria that everybody has and that we can move this thing forward.

[Jonathan Martin]

I talked to Mike Lawlor, who represents a sort of heavily Westchester based district in New York, who said that Johnson gets it. He understands, and that Johnson is willing to work with these members because he recognizes that he's speaker in no small part because of this narrow majority that is made up of folks from blue America. President Trump's more complicated. Like on so many things, he's difficult to pin down. This is trying to tack jello to a wall because Trump tends to veer between the last thing that somebody told him and his mood in the moment. So when I talked to Lawlor last week, he's the New York congressman who's been one of the leading figures in this fight, he told me Trump gets it. He's from midtown Manhattan, for crying out loud. Nobody knows the issue of the tax burden than him. We talked to him three times in three months. He's for us. Well, flash forward to this week when Trump went to Capitol Hill.

[Donald Trump]

This is the biggest tax cut in the history of our country, or you'll get a 68% tax increase. And if that happens, I mean, what Republican could vote for that to happen? Because they wouldn't be a Republican much longer. They would get. They would be knocked out so fast.

[Jonathan Martin]

He singled out Lawler and said, be happy with what you got, basically, and declare victory, and said, I know your district better than you do, and if you lose, you can't blame salt. So Trump's sympathies are suddenly not with the salt crowd. And guys, I think the reason for that is because Trump mostly just wants to get this bill done and wants to sign a bill. And anybody who's dragging their feet for any policy reason, it doesn't matter if right, left or center, he's crotchety about.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Why is it that you can't go back to your district and run for reelection on salt? Is it because this isn't an issue that speaks to the, you know, pun fully intended? Salt of the earth I mean, I.

[Jonathan Martin]

Think, look, I think for the red state folks that are from fairly low tax states, it's just not a significant issue because their voters aren't paying massive property taxes or facing a huge state tax burden like in, you know, California, Jersey and New York, where that bill adds up pretty fast. It's just not relevant for them. And they tend to find these blue state members culturally kind of distant and say, why should us Republicans compensate for the high tax Democratic politicians who are running California, Jersey and New York? Pound sand not sold. I get it. But you know what? Every single day, Congressman lalota is losing constituents to the state of Florida because we have no state income tax. So again, this is failed leadership in New York's Albany's Capitol. Now, the blue staters say, yeah, we got liberal governors, liberal state governments here, but still we got a lot of Republicans or moderates who were voting Republican House races. And we are the reason why you have that narrow majority in the first place. So do us a solid.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Okay, so solids is an issue that speaks to voters of a certain income bracket and thus speaks to politicians who represent voters of a certain income bracket. But Donald Trump is betting that no one is winning or losing an election or at least running a campaign on salt. But what does this fight over salt tell us about where this Republican Party is at under Donald Trump?

[Jonathan Martin]

It tells us that this party is much more oriented around working class voters in rural red America. It's become a Southern and Western accented party, quite literally. And, you know, Trump is the ultimate Manhattanite. And, you know, that's the irony that his strongest base is in the south because obviously born in Queens, but sort of made in Manhattan, but this is a Southern rural party and they're just not that interested in looking out for the concerns of folks from high income, liberal parts of the country, even if they happen to be, in this case, their own GOP colleagues. And I should mention that it's not a coincidence that the person who wrote the first draft of this bill in the House, the Ways and Means Committee chairman, by the way, is like the most coveted chairmanship in Congress. Jason Smith represents Southeast Missouri, an incredibly low tax state in a very rural part of Missouri. And so this is just not front of mind for somebody like that.

[Burgess Everett]

I think that it's very important that.

[Jonathan Martin]

This tax bill is providing relief for.

[Burgess Everett]

Working families, small business owners and, and farmers.

[Jonathan Martin]

This is the priority of House Republicans. And whenever you look at every tax.

[Burgess Everett]

Provision, I think that's something to be mindful of.

[Jonathan Martin]

This is the first but I think significant. You mentioned Medicaid earlier, which I think also is significant. It's the first test of will the Republican Party reflect the coalition that increasingly makes up its rank and file? And they just happen to be a working class, mostly non college party now, and that's who they are. And at the same time, a lot of their policies tend to benefit folks who are more affluent and those people are voting for Democrats. And this is the great realignment of our lifetime in which the parties have really swapped their coalitions. The Republicans were always kind of the country club party and Democrats were the party of labor. And that is obviously changing. But what hasn't changed is the policies haven't caught up to the two coalitions. And, and when you see the House Republicans saying we don't give a damn about your needs on salt, that's a first step toward a Republican Party that is more reflective of its much more rural, working class coalition.

[Sean Ramisvir]

And how much of this fight right now, having spoken to lawmakers who are debating SALT and Medicaid and everything else, feels to you like it's about the next election versus, say, Trump's immediate priorities?

[Jonathan Martin]

Oh, for sure. I wrote this column last week about this issue. And I said looming over all of this is two midterms. One, the one that took place in 2018, which was just a sort of political killing field for suburban Republicans who got swept up in the anti Trump fervor that year. And the other midterm is obviously the next one, which is next year, Trump's second midterm in which, once again, who are the most vulnerable Republicans on the ballot? It's those from center, center left suburban districts who represent places where Trump is just culturally, deeply this popular. I think part of what's delicate about this is that we're talking about Republicans who are in the same party, but their identity and their culture and their frankly, education and kind of income backgrounds are profoundly different. There's a class schism, frankly, in the Republican Party in Congress. And I think the Republicans, whether it's Marjorie Taylor Greene or Jason Smith who wrote the tax bill, they just don't have a lot in common with some of their Republican colleagues from high income and sort of heavily educated parts of this country. It's the proverbial two Americas thing, Blue America and Red America, suburbia, rural America. But you're seeing it within the Republican Party in this context and within the U.S. house.

[Sean Ramisvir]

Jonathan Martin knows what he's doing. Read [e-mail] as we were nearing published time on the program we got news that Mike Johnson and his fellow Republicans had reached a tentative deal on salt. Apparently they agreed to raise the limit on state and local tax deductions to $40,000. We'll see how that and the rest of the BBB shakes out in the coming days, weeks, months, years. Devin Schwartz made our show today, with a little help from his friend Hadima Wagdi, and a lot of help from his other friends Amna Al Saadi and Laura Bullard and Andrea Christensdotter and Patrick Boyd. This is TODAY Explained.

[WhatsApp Ad]

Support for Today explained comes from WhatsApp. Whether it's memes or a vacation itinerary or a heartfelt voice message, your private messages are just that, private. They're yours and no one else's. WhatsApp understands that, which is why it's a core component of the app's design. No one, not even WhatsApp, can see or hear your personal messages. That includes personal calls, plus any documents, photos or media that you share in your personal chat. WhatsApp makes sure your personal messages stay yours. WhatsApp message privately with everyone visit WhatsApp.com privacy to learn more.

[Burgess Everett]

More.