Extreme Makeover: White House Edition

Summary

Today, Explained – Extreme Makeover: White House Edition

Date: October 27, 2025
Hosts: Noel King, Sean Rameswaram (voice not present this episode)
Guests: Dan Diamond (Washington Post White House reporter), Debbie Millman (Design Matters host, design historian)

---

Episode Overview

The episode delves into President Donald Trump's controversial demolition of the White House East Wing to make way for a massive, privately funded ballroom. Hosts and guests assess the historical, political, and cultural implications of this bold move, exploring themes of presidential power, architectural symbolism, private funding in public institutions, and the intersection of personal branding and national heritage.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The East Wing Demolition and New Ballroom (02:12–07:19)

• The Project: President Trump demolished the entire East Wing of the White House, historically used for social functions, the First Lady's office, and a theater, to build a 90,000 square-foot ballroom.
• Public Reaction: According to polling, 53% of Americans disapprove of the project, another quarter are unsure, and a quarter support it. ([00:14])
• No Formal Plans: The administration started demolition without releasing formal architectural plans, sharing only vague renderings resembling Trump’s own resorts.

  "We still have not seen formal plans…which is very unusual, if not unprecedented." – Dan Diamond ([04:08])

• Historical Use: The East Wing was "not as glamorous as the West Wing, but...an important part of the White House." – Dan Diamond ([02:58])

2. The Scale and Ambiguity of the Project (05:55–07:19)

• Unprecedented Size: The ballroom is supposed to be 90,000 square feet, nearly double the current White House residential space (55,000 square feet).
• Shifting Details: The project's cost and size have kept changing, at times cited as $200 million, now $300 million. Capacity estimates increased from 650 to “about 1,000” guests. ([05:55])

3. Legalities and Process (06:33–07:19)

• Exploiting Loopholes: Trump exploited a loophole allowing demolition without approval, though construction still technically needs commission review.

  "Whether or not he's allowed, he's going to do it." – Dan Diamond ([06:36])

4. Justification from the Administration (07:34–09:31)

• Practical Arguments: The White House claims it needs better event space, as past events have suffered from poor weather and cramped interiors.
• Trump’s Builder Persona: The President asserts his expertise in real estate, likening the future ballroom to his Mar-a-Lago and Turnberry resorts.

  "I have an advantage. I was a really good real estate developer. So I know how to get things done." – Donald Trump ([08:18])

• Funding Sources: The White House touts that no taxpayer money will be used; all funds come from private donors and Trump himself.

5. The Donors – Privately Financed Public Works (09:31–10:54)

• Major Donors: 35–37 corporations and individuals including Amazon, Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Google, Comcast, and the Winklevoss brothers. Many are entities with significant business before the Trump administration.
• Public Opinion: While Americans dislike demolishing part of the White House, over half prefer private donor funding over taxpayer support.

  "About 52% of adults said these renovations should be paid for by private donors…versus 19% who said it should be paid for by taxpayers." – Dan Diamond ([11:00])

6. Architectural and Symbolic Significance (11:29–13:38, 16:53–26:16)

• Continuation of Trump Aesthetic: Past changes include a gold-laden Oval Office and a paved-over Rose Garden, echoing his aesthetic from commercial properties.

  "The Oval Office...looks like something out of Mar-A-Lago or Versailles…what you would expect at a Trump resort." – Dan Diamond ([11:38])

• Debbie Millman's Reaction:

  "My gut reaction is one of heartbreak. It's really sad to see this historic wing…demolished." – Debbie Millman ([17:04])

• Lack of Transparency:

  "It's really smoke and mirrors. There are no floor plans that have been shared." – Debbie Millman ([18:06])

7. The People's House vs. The President’s Brand (19:02–21:29)

• Representation and Identity: Debate over whether the White House should reflect the elected President’s identity.

  "What Mr. Trump is doing is creating a castle or palace." – Debbie Millman ([19:24])

• Pattern of Disregard for History: Millman cites examples from Trump and his father’s development history showing a pattern of demolishing historic buildings and breaking preservation promises.

8. Presidential Precedent and World Comparisons (21:48–25:32)

• Historical Alterations: Jefferson, Roosevelt, Truman, and the Kennedys all altered the White House, but typically for practical, public-oriented reasons, and after extensive expert consultation.
• International Parallels: The expansion is likened to grand gestures by monarchs and dictators:

  "Louis XIV's vision for Versailles...Benito Mussolini's marble piazzas...Architecture was created to extend the power of a leader by rewriting the meaning of the nation's most visible symbols." – Debbie Millman ([23:53])

• Not for the People:

  "This is not a reflection of or for the people. The ballroom will rescript the White House as an extension of the Trump brand." – Debbie Millman ([26:16])

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

| Timestamp | Speaker | Quote | |---|---------|-------| | 00:14 | Noel King | "53% of Americans polled disapprove. A quarter say go for it and a quarter aren't sure." | | 04:08 | Dan Diamond | "We still have not seen formal plans…which is very unusual, if not unprecedented." | | 06:36 | Dan Diamond | "What President Trump has showed us…whether or not he's allowed, he's going to do it." | | 08:18 | Donald Trump | "I was a really good real estate developer. So I know how to get things done." | | 10:54 | Dan Diamond | "…about 52% of adults said these renovations should be paid for by private donors…versus 19% who said it should be paid for by taxpayers." | | 17:04 | Debbie Millman | "Oh, my gut reaction is one of heartbreak. It's really sad to see what's happening, to see the demolition…" | | 18:06 | Debbie Millman | "It's really smoke and mirrors. There are no floor plans that have been shared." | | 19:24 | Debbie Millman | "It's not one person's house. And what Mr. Trump is doing is creating a castle or palace." | | 23:53 | Debbie Millman | "Louis XIV's vision for the design of Versailles…Benito Mussolini's marble piazzas…architecture was created to extend the power of a leader by rewriting the nation's most visible symbols. And essentially that is what Trump is doing here." | | 26:16 | Debbie Millman | "This is not a reflection of or for the people. The ballroom will rescript the White House as an extension of the Trump brand." |

---

Key Segment Timestamps

• Opening Overview: [00:00–01:00]
• Demolition and East Wing history: [02:12–04:08]
• Ballroom renderings and Trump's vision: [04:47–05:55]
• Legal process and loopholes: [06:33–07:19]
• Funding and donor implications: [08:56–10:54]
• Historical White House renovations vs. Trump's project: [21:48–23:39]
• International architectural analogies: [23:52–25:32]
• Debbie Millman’s critique of Trump’s approach: [17:04–26:16]

---

Tone and Closing Thoughts

The episode balances factual reporting from Dan Diamond with critical design analysis from Debbie Millman. The mood alternates between incredulity, concern, and lament for the loss of historical heritage, filtered through a discussion on presidential privilege and the evolving symbolism of the White House.

The hosts and experts stress that while White House renovations are not unprecedented, Trump’s approach—marked by opacity, grandeur, and personal branding—feels fundamentally different, raising alarms about the erosion of democratic and historical norms.

Final Quote:

"It will challenge the integrity of the existing architecture of the White House...I think it's converting what…has always been considered...the House of the People into a stage for Trump's personal aggrandizement." – Debbie Millman ([28:01])

---

Transcript

[Noel King]

The latest thing dividing Americans is President Trump's 300 million or so dollar ballroom.

[Donald Trump]

Nobody's actually seen anything quite like it. I think it'll be one of the great ballrooms anywhere in the world.

[Noel King]

53% of Americans polled disapprove. A quarter say go for it and a quarter aren't sure. So he's not using any taxpayer money, but the donated funds are coming from unsettling corporations like Palantir and unsettling individ the Winklevie. He tore down the entire east wing, but the White House was having parties in tents on the lawn for lack of a real ballroom. It's ugly. That's subjective. It's the people's house and the people voted for Donald Trump. Today on Today explained Demolition Man.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes, so you don't have to. Don't know the difference between matte, paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With Thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro. You just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews, all on the app. Download today.

And now a message from McAfee.

[Noel King]

Your package couldn't be delivered.

[Dan Diamond]

You owe thousands in unpaid tolls.

[Debbie Millman]

You won a free gift.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

If texts like these sound familiar, McAfee can help. McAfee automatically identifies text and email scams as well as AI generated audio to help you stay safe. If they're faking it, they're not making it past us. Get award winning scam detection today mcafee.com keepitreal.

[Donald Trump]

I mean, I see this.

[Dan Diamond]

I like.

[Donald Trump]

It's so incredible. Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.

[Dan Diamond]

Bomb.

[Donald Trump]

Okay.

[Dan Diamond]

I'm Dan Diamond, a White House reporter at the Washington Post.

[Noel King]

Out of curiosity, is covering the White House normally about actually covering the White House like the just realized, normally, are you reporting on things other than the building?

[Dan Diamond]

I'm usually covering the people and the policy and not the upholstery. But I think part of the beat is the actual building. And that was the story this past week.

[Noel King]

Perfect. Okay, great. Okay. So at the moment, as we speak, the east wing of the White House is basically a pile of rubble.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

President Trump's massive demolition of the East Wing is now complete.

[Dan Diamond]

Now that East Wing, with all the history it contained, is gone, reduced to.

[Noel King]

Rubble to make way for President Trump's new ballroom. Before this week, last week, what was the east wing of the White House for?

[Dan Diamond]

The East Wing was the entrance for lots of visitors who made their way to the White House. If you went to a Christmas party at the White House the past number of years, you probably went in through the East Wing. If you were visiting the first lady's office, that was located in the East Wing. There was a movie theater that the president would sometimes screen special films in. So it was not as glamorous as the West Wing, but it was an important part of the White House, and it had been part of the White House for decades. So the fact that it is now rubble is a very big change.

[Noel King]

It sounds like maybe some of the softer aspects of White House life were the East Wing's responsibility.

[Dan Diamond]

That's right. And sometimes to the detriment of staff who ended up in the East Wing. I was talking to Tevy Troy, a historian, about this over the weekend, who made the point that I think it was during the Kennedy administration, there was a fight between some Kennedy staffers, and they were mocking the East Wing folks as they were only in the east. That was the more feminine side of the White House with Jackie Kennedy. So it was a little bit of machismo, and not as prestigious as being in the West Wing, but again, it's still the White House, and it was a major part of the White House these past years.

[Noel King]

All right, so we will have a new East Wing. What's it going to look like? What are the plans here?

[Dan Diamond]

Well, I wish I could tell you, Noel. I think at this point, as we're talking Monday, October 27th, we still have not seen formal plans. We've seen some renderings that President Trump has shared and the White House put out on a website. But we, we don't know exactly what the East Wing is going to look like. For the past week, we've been asking, will it be rebuilt? What will it contain? What will this ballroom that the president wants actually look like in practice? And there are still no formal plans, which is very unusual, if not unprecedented, for a major White House plan like this to go ahead with demolishing part of the building without letting us know what's going to replace it.

[Noel King]

Can you tell me a little bit about the renderings? Like what? What do we know?

[Dan Diamond]

So President Trump has spoken all year about his desire for a ballroom at the White House.

[Donald Trump]

I build a beautiful ballro, and I actually offered to build a ballroom for the White House. I was going to build it right there. This was going to be the reception room. And then I was going to build a beautiful, beautiful ballroom like I have at Mar A Lago.

[Dan Diamond]

And frankly, he's spoken about this for more than this year. It goes all the way back to the first Obama administration. David Axelrod, an advisor to President Obama, has said that President Trump, then Donald Trump the builder, called and pitched him in 2010 on building a ballroom. So we know that he has wanted to do this for a long time. And the renderings look very much like a Trump resort. I'm not an expert in ballrooms, Noel. Perhaps there's an architectural eye that would be able to distinguish between this ballroom and, say, the Mar A Lago Ballroom or the ballroom that President Trump has at his resort at Turnberry, Scotland. But they're all kind of evocative of each other. Lots of gold, high ceilings, big windows, nice as ballrooms go. But again, a major project on the campus of the White House that we still haven't seen formal plans for. And normally it would go through a review process before this kind of project began.

[Noel King]

And remind me, how many square feet are we talking about here?

[Dan Diamond]

Well, President Trump has said it's going to be 90,000 square feet, which is, wow, significant. The White House residence, that main building is 55,000 square feet. So we're talking about an addition that would effectively double the size of the White House. But it's hard to say, Noel, exactly how big it is and what it's going to look like, because President Trump has changed repeatedly the capacity of the ballroom. For instance, he said it was going to be 650 people. Now he's saying it's going to be about 1,000. He said it would be a $200 million project. He steadily raised that now to 300 million. So it seems like things are in flux, and what might have been the size of the White House ballroom might not be what it ends up being.

[Noel King]

Is the president allowed to just do this?

[Dan Diamond]

I think what President Trump has showed us, not just with this ballroom, but with many things this year, is whether or not he's allowed he's going to do it. And in this case, there was a loophole, it appears, on demolishing parts of the White House campus. Normally, a president would go through the process of seeking review and approval from several commissions that help guide historic development on the White House grounds. And that kind of work meant waiting, usually to demolish things before you got approval to go ahead. President Trump and his team realized, and apparently this is legal, that they could just demolish something. The building may still have to wait for approval, but the demolishing the president could do.

[Noel King]

Okay, so let's talk about the case that the White House is making for this. In a news release, the White House said the ballroom will be, quote, a bold, necessary addition. How's the administration making the case for this addition?

[Dan Diamond]

So what the White House has said, and there is some truth to this, that presidents have long needed an event space to host major VIPs, to have something that is indoors rather than the tent that is sometimes set up when the White House wants to have hundreds of people on the grounds. And coming to you from Washington, D.C. the weather in Washington, D.C. can be fickle. There have been outdoor events that have been skewed or somewhat ruined because of the bad weather here. So there's absolutely truth to the value that the White House could use more event space. And the White House itself is small and cramped in ways that don't always come through on television. What the president and his team are also arguing is that he's a builder who knows how to do this well and better than any anybody else.

[Donald Trump]

I have an advantage. I was a really good real estate developer. So I know how to get things done. I know how to build it. You'll see it in a minute. When you look at the ballroom, which I built at Mar a Lago, I.

[Dan Diamond]

Think that's what in the eye of the beholder, if you've seen the Trump constructions around the world. But it has raised the question of what exactly is the president going to build and why can't this go through a review process before he starts to build it? But that's part of their argument, too. And I think the president is also very proud, he says, of the fact that this is going to be paid for by donors, that there are about $350 million in private donations, he has said to cover the cost so there will be nothing to the taxpayer. The president has said he's going to pay out of pocket, too.

[Donald Trump]

I'm not going to ask the government for money. I'll fund it and I'm sure we'll have some donations to it. But it's not an inexpensive thing. It'll cost a lot of money.

[Dan Diamond]

Now, on the one hand, there's polling that shows Americans do prefer that they don't want to pay for White House renovations. But on the other, it raises serious questions about what are the donors hoping to get. We have seen an administration that has played favorites, that has bent the rule of law in many cases. So if you're donating to the president's personal priority, what are you expecting to get on the other side?

[Noel King]

Hey, what do we know about the donors? Who is paying for this?

[Dan Diamond]

The list that the White House gave out last week is about 35, 37 companies and individuals. There are some companies that are quite familiar. Amazon, who was founded by Jeff Bezos, who owns the Washington Post. Palantir, a major contractor here in D.C. lockheed Martin, Google, Comcast, I mean, big, big companies. And many companies that have business in front of the administration. And then there are individuals like the Winklevoss brothers, who are cryptocurrency entrepreneurs. There's Stephen Schwarzman, a wealthy individual who has been a longtime Republican donor and is close to the administration. So folks of that nature and companies that are significant and, again, have dealings in front of this administration.

[Noel King]

It's not taxpayer dollars, though. And one of the defenses I've heard from White House adjacent people is, hey, you're not paying for it.

[Dan Diamond]

And again, there is evidence that Americans support that part of this project. The polling overall has been pretty bad that slightly more than half of Americans don't approve the decision to demolish part of the White House. Many are against the idea of a ballroom.

[Debbie Millman]

This is a part of our history. And one individual made those decisions with no input and no opportunity for the people's House to have the input of the people.

[Dan Diamond]

It's a desecration, really, I think. But there is polling that shows Americans generally favor the idea of that this would be funded by donors and not by taxpayers. The money's coming out of his pocket and other people's pockets, not the taxpayers. So that's all I care about. I saw some YouGov polling on this last week where about 52% of adults said these renovations should be paid for by private donors to save taxpayers money, versus 19% who said it should be paid for by taxpayers. So this actually is something that is falling in the White House favor when so much over the past week has not.

[Noel King]

How does this renovation of the East Wing or this rebuilding of the East Wing, how does that compare to the other changes that President Trump has brought to the White House? Physical changes?

[Dan Diamond]

Well, in some ways, Noel, they're of a piece. I was thinking about this last week when we broke the story that Trump was tearing down the East Wing. And I was thinking about all the other things he's done to the White House. The paving over of the Rose Garden, the putting gold in the Oval Office, where I've been a couple times for work, and a, it looks like something out of Mar a Lago or Versailles. I mean, there's so much gold in there now. It's significantly different. These are all things that President Trump would have done at one of his own resorts and ballrooms and the Rose Garden Club, which is his name for the newly paved over Rose Garden. I mean, that's what you would expect at a Trump resort. So that all kind of is of a piece, I think more broadly, Trump has bulldozed the federal government in many ways, and that's probably why this story took off. It was a metaphor for so many things that President Trump has tried to do, where he goes ahead and makes his changes and consequences be damned. And lots of Americans are understandably confused or even upset to see part of the White House come down so quickly.

[Noel King]

Dan diamond of the Washington Post, he covers the White House. Coming up, our ballrooms, ourselves what the President's plans Tell us about us Foreign Comes from Quince Sweater weather is upon us. And sweater weather isn't just about sweaters. It's about all the layers in your fall outfits that keep you warm as the days get colder. From the aforementioned sweaters to premium denim to luxe outerwear, Quince says they have everything you need to stay cozy this autumn. And by partnering directly with top tier factories, Quince is able to cut out the middleman, which is how they say they can deliver luxury quality clothing at half the price of similar brands.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

Here's Nisha Chital the Cotton Boyfriend crewneck sweater. It's kind of just a good classic oversized sweater that looks kind of effortlessly polished and put together. It's really easy to build an outfit around it. You know, you can throw on a sweater and jeans and walk out the door and fall. It's a perfect, easy outfit.

[Noel King]

You can find your fall staples at Quints. You can go to quince.com explained for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada too. That's Q U-I-N-E.com explained to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com explained.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

Support for the show today comes from Bombus. They have all the comfy socks, slippers, tees and underwear you'll need for the fall. And they're made from premium materials that actually make sense with this time of year, like merino wool, strong Supima cotton or durable rag wool. Some of my favorites in that list. Nisha Chital is our colleague here at Vox and she's tried bombas.

After a summer of wearing sandals for months, it does feel like sock weather again. So I'm excited to, you know, start wearing regular non sandal shoes again, boots, sneakers, flats, loafers, and I think interestingly like I have a Bombas style of sock that could pair with each of those types of footwear.

Bombas also wants to know about their mission, which is that for every item you purchase, they donate one to someone facing homelessness. They say over 150 million items have been donated thanks to customers. Plus, Bombas is available for international shopping to over two hundo countries. You can go to bombas.comexplained and use the code explained for 20% off your first purchase. That's B O M B A S.comexplained codeeplained at checkout.

[Noel King]

Support for Tay Explained comes from Framer. If you're looking for one place where all your website programming needs can be accomplished, you can try Framer. Framer unifies Design, CMS and Publishing on one Canvas. No handoff, no hassle, says Framer. Everything you need to design and publish in one place. Framer says Framer has already built the fastest way to publish beautiful production ready websites. And Framer says Framer is now redesigning how we design for the web with the recent launch of Design Pages, a free canvas based design tool. Framer is more than a site builder, says Framer. It's a true all in one design platform. From social assets to campaign visuals to those vectors and those icons all the way to a live site. Framer is where ideas go live. Start to finish this Framer ready to design, iterate and publish all in one tool. You can start creating for free at framer.com design and use code explained for a free month of framer Pro. That's framer.com design and use promo code explain framer.com design promo code explained framer.com design promo code Explained. Rules and restrictions may apply.

[Dan Diamond]

Yeah, Patty, back it up, back it up. It's today explained.

[Donald Trump]

You probably hear the beautiful sound of construction to the back.

[Noel King]

Debbie Millman hosts the show Design Matters. She's an author, an educator at the School of Visual Arts, and a designer herself. And Debbie, your gut reaction to the new ballroom?

[Debbie Millman]

Oh, my gut reaction is one of heartbreak. It's really sad to see what's happening, to see the demolition, to see this historic wing of the White House demolished. He's essentially done this on his own without any input or counsel from preservationists or historians. If you go to the White House website, they very craftily put up a historical list of other renovations that have occurred, but those were always done with historians, preservationists, architects that were quite open about what was being done with blueprints and so forth. And so it's a little bit of a game of hide and seek here.

[Sponsor/Ad Voice]

You're responding to people who say that.

[Dan Diamond]

You haven't been transparent enough about this.

[Donald Trump]

I haven't been transparent that some of.

[Debbie Millman]

Your colleagues feel it should be.

[Donald Trump]

I've shown this to everybody that would.

[Debbie Millman]

Listen, but it's really smoke and mirrors. There are no floor plans that have been shared. There's a couple of sort of nondescript drawings that have been shared, but don't in any way feature what's happening on the inside of the building. Building and more than just a footprint.

[Noel King]

President Trump is not known for his restraint. Right. He likes things big. He likes them gold. He likes. He likes things that some people might call tacky or gaudy. If you, if you kind of look at what Americans are saying about this remodel, some people see those visual choices as representative of prosperity, as representative of success. Like one man's. Tacky is another man's. Hey, that's gorgeous. Is there an argument here that, you know, the People's House should reflect the guy that the people elected? Because that reflects us as well.

[Debbie Millman]

The answer to that is very much about what you believe to be true about representation. Those that do see it representing prosperity, that certainly can be aspirational. But that's not the status of most Americans. This is the People's house.

[Noel King]

House.

[Debbie Millman]

It's not one person's house. And what Mr. Trump is doing is creating a castle or palace.

[Donald Trump]

It's gotten great reviews.

[Debbie Millman]

President Trump has long treated architecture as his tool of identity, as has his father. In 1966.

[Donald Trump]

Excellent. Fantastic. Unbelievable.

[Debbie Millman]

He tore down a 19th century amusement park in Coney island and promised that he would preserve some of the historical elements. But they didn't. Instead, they threw a party at the demo site. Believe it or not, there were bikini clad, hard hat wearing models. And Fred Trump handed out bricks for people to throw at the glass front of the historic pavilion there to dismantle and destroy it as opposed to preserve it for historical purposes. And then Trump followed suit. In 1980, he demolished the Bronwit Teller building on Fifth Avenue to be able to make way for Trump Tower.

[Dan Diamond]

Very nice.

[Donald Trump]

Very, very nice.

[Debbie Millman]

And he promised the limestone art Deco reliefs to the Met, to the Metropolitan Museum of Art, but he destroyed them.

[Noel King]

He was a lot of trouble in the city.

[Debbie Millman]

He was in the headlines every day.

[Noel King]

New York City Trumped Developer smashes panels.

[Debbie Millman]

And when asked about that later, he shrugged his shoulders and provided a sense of disdain for them as opposed to respect. This is not something that he hasn't done before. And it shows a lack of respect for history. It shows a lack of respect for. For preserving artifacts that have value and meaning, to create something that is benefiting only really himself.

[Noel King]

You know, I don't know much about the history of the White House, but I have to assume that President Trump isn't the first president to kind of tinker with the place. I mean, these are generally men with. With big egos who see themselves as big leaders. What's been done in the past, and is what. What Trump is doing that much different?

[Debbie Millman]

Well, the new ballroom is estimated at 90,000 square feet. It is not the first intervention in the White House by a long shot. Thomas Jefferson expanded the grounds. He created gardens that reflected his ideals. Franklin Roosevelt relocated the Oval Office to the southeast corner of the West Wing. But at the time, it was. The existing office was rather dark, rather cramped, and so he brought a lot of light and accessibility to the office. Harry Truman oversaw the reconstruction of the interior.

[Donald Trump]

When President Harry s. Truman and Mrs. Truman came to live in the White House, it had seen almost a century and a half of hard use.

[Debbie Millman]

But a lot of that was because of what seemed to be imminent collapse of parts of the building that were so unsafe that there was really no other recourse but to do that. Of course, Jacqueline Kennedy, I have a committee which has museum experts and government people and private citizens on it, and then everything we do is subject to approval by the Fine Arts Committee. Her restoration project, in general, emphasized historical continuity. She also obviously created the Rose Garden. She did a lot to the grounds, all of which had been demolished. So this is not the. The first destruction of pieces of the White House that Trump wants to remake as his own for primarily celebratory or party reasons, as opposed to reasons that reflect more safety or preservation or augmentation for the people, as opposed to billionaire donors.

[Noel King]

All right, so other presidents have changed the White House, but you're saying this sort of belies comparison. If there's no real comparison in the US Are there comparisons elsewhere, other world leaders who have done this sort of thing?

[Debbie Millman]

Oh, my gosh, yes.

[Noel King]

Oh.

[Debbie Millman]

Louis XIV's vision for the design of Versailles transformed what was a royal residence into a stage which his reign would be essentially performed. And Benito Mussolini's marble piazzas sought to tie fascism to Rome's magnificence.

[Dan Diamond]

From high balcony, Italy's idol looks down on his admirers. And the smile on his face is.

[Donald Trump]

The smile of a man who is sure.

[Debbie Millman]

In the process, entire neighborhoods were Demolished to create the boulevards of the Imperiale in Versailles and Fascist Rome. Architecture was created to extend the power of a leader by rewriting the meaning of the nation's most visible symbols. And essentially that is what Trump is doing here. It's not a practical addition. It's a metaphor for the Trump brand overtaking the institution. Now, there's no question that there will be value to a ballroom. The current ballroom holds, I think, about 250 people. When the White House has hosted bigger parties, they've had to erect tents on the grounds. And that was not always a feasible or comfortable situation. If it was raining, people had to walk on plastic. But that doesn't mean we need to have the over the top showpiece that does not reflect the soul of this country. The soul of this country is not gilded flourishes. It's just not.

[Noel King]

Those examples that you shared. There's some monarchy in there. There's some dictator slash fascism in there. You're an expert, right? You're an expert in your field. And President Trump has done this thing in America that's very interesting. Which he's cast a lot of doubt on experts in favor of regular people, ordinary folk. And I think what he might say is, I was democratically elected by the ordinary folk. I have those regular people on my side. And if I choose to remake the White House in my image or the image of something else, that's what ordinary Americans voted for. Madame Expert, what do you think about that argument?

[Debbie Millman]

Well, this is not a reflection of or for the people. The ballroom will rescript the White House as an extension of the Trump brand. And the fact that this has been funded by and hosted for billionaires in exchange for recognition of their own brands as part of this really refutes that statement. In my opinion, one of the great tenants of a brand is, can you remove the logo and still identify what it is? Do these iconic assets speak to you beyond the name of the brand? And the current building will be reshaped in the image of President Trump. It will be defined by over the top opulence, truly exaggerated and cumbersome scale. And it's a preference. It shows a preference for size over substance and size over subtlety and size over dignity. It will challenge the integrity of the existing architecture of the White House in ways we can't even envision yet. And I think it's converting what is considered to be and has always been considered to be and described as the House of the People into a stage for Trump's personal aggrandizement.

[Noel King]

Debbie Millman of DesignMaster, Kelly Wesinger and Denise Guerra produced today's show with a little help from Avishai Artsy. Jolie Myers edited Patrick Boyd and Adrienne Lilly engineered. Laura Bullard is our senior researcher. I'm Noel King. It's Today Expl.