Loading summary
Noel King
Today is day five of Israel and Iran trading deadly fire. And it's day five of President Trump sending mixed messages about what his administration wants. On Air Force One this morning, Trump said the US Is not looking for a ceasefire. We're looking for better than a ceasefire.
Nahal Toosi
Better than a ceasefire.
Noel King
He said he means an end, a.
Andrew Prokop
Real end, not a ceasefire, an end.
Noel King
Trump hasn't clarified whether the US Will get involved in this conflict. New reports suggest that Israel wants American help in reaching Fordo. This is a nuclear fuel enrichment plant built deep in a mountain that reportedly only American bombs and bombers can penetrate. The thing holding Trump back? A fight within his own MAGA movement over whether America should go to war again. It's coming up next on TODAY explained.
Nahal Toosi
Foreign.
Noel King
Support for TODAY Explained comes from Adeo. Addio is an AI native customer relationship management platform that Adeo says is built for the next era of companies. A powerful data structure adapts to your business model, sinks in all your contacts in minutes, and enriches your business with actionable data. Addio says it also allows you to create those email sequences, those real time reports, those partners, powerful automations which they claim can help you build what matters most, your company. You can go to adeo.comtodayexplained to get 15% off your first year. That's a T T I O.comtodayexplained avoiding.
Andrew Prokop
Your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte, paint, finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download today.
Noel King
Shoma Gushmikoni Betas Ri Hai Mozua Ruz you are listening to TODAY Explained.
Nahal Toosi
My name is Nahal Toosi. I am senior foreign affairs correspondent and a columnist for Politico.
Noel King
Why did Israel attack Iran?
Nahal Toosi
Israel has long seen Iran's regime, especially its nuclear program and its ballistic missile program, as an existential threat to the state of Israel. Ladies and gentlemen, the relevant question is not when Iran will get the bomb. The relevant question is at what stage can we no longer stop Iran from getting the bomb? And they also especially because of the last year and a half of fighting in the region, they see Iran as being particularly vulnerable. Right now. Israel has decimated or severely weakened a number of Iranian proxy militias in the Region, including Hamas, Hezbollah, they've been fighting somewhat with the Houthis as well. At the same time, they've had a couple of exchanges directly with Iran and they've already taken out a good number of Iran's weapons, FAC facilities and other infrastructure over the past year and a half. And so they decided that now was a good time to attack the Iranians.
Unnamed Analyst
Acknowledging that some of their senior military leaders have been killed or wounded in these Israeli attacks, the most important of which is Hossein Salami, who is the head of the Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is of course the elite wing of Iran's military.
Andrew Prokop
Israel has also targeted nuclear scientists. They include Iran's former nuclear chief and several university professors.
Nahal Toosi
And the particular timing was interesting because the US And Iran were holding nuclear talks to try to rein in Iran's nuclear program. But Israel does not trust this regime and it was not confident that any deal that would be reached would be strong enough for it to feel comfortable with this regime.
Noel King
We had covered the U. S Iran talks on the show and it was notable at the time, at the very start, how optimistic people really seem to feel like maybe there could be a breakthrough here.
Nahal Toosi
So the opportunity for the Iranians to actually strike a deal is frankly greater now than it was ever during the Biden administration.
Noel King
What was happening with those talks and did the United States know that this might happen in response to those talks?
Nahal Toosi
Well, look, when it comes to US Iranian, Israeli relations, the bar is really low for optimism. Foreign, there was some possibility of getting some version of a nuclear agreement that would reign in Iran's ambitions and make the United States President Trump in particular be willing to say he has a deal. But I will just say I think there was always going to be some red lines that Iran didn't want to cross. It did not, for instance, want to give up its right to enrich uranium on its soil, even to just low levels of enrichment. And for the Israelis, that's just a non starter. In recent years, Iran has produced enough highly enriched uranium for nine atom bombs. Nine. So there's just a lot that went into that. President Trump really did push Israel, from what I could tell, to hold off, give diplomacy a chance. Now, did the United States know that Israel was going to carry out this attack? Look, the fact that Israel was preparing for an attack was not a secret. Everyone knew this. And my understanding, from what I've read and what I've been told is there was a brief heads up that this was about to happen. But that doesn't mean that the United States told Israel, yes, go ahead, do it. We support you. Nor from what I can tell, that they say, do not do it. We will be furious if you do it. It seems to me instead of a green light or a red light, the light might have been broken. But that's something that frankly, as journalists and others, we're still trying to figure out really what exactly happened.
Noel King
One of the big questions in the US Is, is America going to get involved in this conflict? Do we know to what degree the US Is or is not involved right now and what involvement, what further involvement might mean?
Nahal Toosi
Well, there's some reports that the US has been helping Israel intercept missiles from Iran. I think this is also partly because you United States has troops in the region and so it's trying to protect Americans. So on the defensive end, the US Is certainly involved, but to my knowledge, the United States has not been actively involved in the offensive portion of this attack. In terms of Israel going after Iranian targets, that could change. If Iran, for instance, strikes American targets, if Iran, say, goes after American troops in the region directly, the United States might decide it has to get involved even for, for a temporary basis. This is very unpredictable. This could last days, if not weeks, maybe months. And so anything is possible in terms of U.S. involvement at this stage.
Noel King
Does this attack put an end to the U. S. Iran nuclear talks? Are those just over now?
Nahal Toosi
They're definitely on hold, but there are reports that the Iranians are reaching out. And it's not just reports. I mean, the foreign minister of Iran has said we're happy to talk again, but he's also said that they still want to maintain the right to enrich uranium, which President Trump has said he doesn't want to allow. So it seems like they're being a bit inflexible at the moment. I hope there's going to be a deal. I think it's time for a deal and we'll see what happens. But sometimes they have to fight it out, but we're going to see what happens. But again, the Israelis do not trust the regime. I just don't know what the regime could do to assuage their concerns with any deal. I just think the Israelis don't trust this particular regime to adhere to even what might be the most amazing best deal. The trust deficit is just extraordinary. Yeah.
Noel King
So that sort of demands the question be asked, does Israel want something more? Is Israel after regime change here?
Nahal Toosi
Prime Minister Netanyahu of Israel has said that regime change could be a possibility. He has issued statements to the Iranian people saying we are creating a path for you to take your freedom. And as we achieve our objectives, we're also clearing the path for you to achieve your objective, which is freedom. I believe other Israeli officials, the way they're saying is that's not our objective. That's not our official goal. We just want to destroy the nuclear and ballistic missile programs. But they don't deny that it's a possibility and that they wouldn't mind seeing it happen. So it kind of depends in part on whether the Iranian people rise up. But it also could depend on part on whether Israel changes its mind going forward and decides, you know what, we want to take out a few political leaders. We want to go beyond what we've done already, and I wouldn't rule that out. Israel has shown over the past year and a half in its fights in Gaza, Lebanon and beyond that it is willing to adjust its goals.
Noel King
What you will hear if you're listening to interviews from inside Israel, is that an action like this kind of lines Israelis further up behind Netanyahu. Like, okay, now we have an objective. Netanyahu's unpopular, but we got to get behind him for now. Do you know what the reaction in Iran is to this? Does this make Iranians like their government more or want them out more?
Nahal Toosi
Look, I think it depends on which Iranian you talk to. There's certainly going to always be a faction that supports the regime. They're very kind of bought into the ideology, and there's going to be some, I think, rally around the flag effect. But overall, over the years, I think most of the Iranian people are really, really sick of this regime. They would be happy to see the Islamic leadership fall. The question isn't whether they want it or not in their hearts. It's a question of whether they have the ability and the organization to help bring it about. The Iranian opposition is, frankly, not very cohesive or good. They tend to spend more time fighting amongst themselves. They're not really anchored inside Iran. They're mostly on the outside and don't really have a lot of power. So there's nobody who's a real alternative. There's no organization or person who's a true opposition leader that people can rally around. There are some who style themselves such, but that's not really there. So it's a bit of a mess.
Noel King
A couple weeks ago on the show, we talked about how President Trump was perceived as giving Benjamin Netanyahu the cold shoulder. He visits the region. He doesn't go to Israel. He seems a little chillier than usual. Do Israel's actions force the United States and Israel closer together.
Nahal Toosi
Yes. I mean, look at the end of the day when Israel is in any way in some sort of a danger, even if it's danger that its actions have provoked, the United States is going to stand up for Israel. I can't imagine any president that wouldn't do that. You have to understand Benjamin Netanyahu has basically messed with every US President he has dealt with. Not a lot of them care for the guy, to be really frank, but they do care for the most part about the state of Israel itself. And so America will be there for Israel ultimately.
Noel King
Nahal Tusi. You can read her at Politico. Coming up, America first versus The Hawks.
Unnamed Advertiser
Support for the show comes from Thrive Market. If you've been looking to Thrive, finding food that uses healthy ingredients and isn't astronomically expensive is hard.
Unnamed Analyst
True.
Unnamed Advertiser
Thrive Market wants to make it easier. Interesting. Thrive says they are like your favorite health food store, but online and more affordable.
Andrew Prokop
Aha.
Unnamed Advertiser
They say everything they sell is non GMO and and meets incredibly high standards and it's all delivered right to your door. Our colleague Claire White got a delivery.
Andrew Prokop
The value factor that is so good for it is the convenience.
Noel King
The convenience was unbeatable. Everything was shipped right to my door and packaged so well. No spills, no breaks. Within a few days, you can skip.
Unnamed Advertiser
The junk without overspending by heading over to thrive market.com explained to get 30% off your first order and a free $60 gift. Now that is generous. That's thrive market.com explained. Thrive market.com explained support for the show today comes from Smalls Cat Food because big cat food only works for big cats.
Noel King
I don't know.
Andrew Prokop
I'm sorry.
Unnamed Advertiser
Sometimes having a pet can be a real chore, like taking care of a toddler that never grows up. But ask most pet owners and they'll tell you it's worth it. Smalls Cat Food wants to make it easy for you to feed your cat the best. Smalls Cat Food says they have protein packed recipes made with preservative free ingredients and it's delivered right to your door. And now you can add other cat favorites to your Smalls order, like amazing treats and snacks. What are you waiting for? They ask. You can give your cat the food they deserve for a limited time only because you are a Today Explained listener. Thank you for listening. You can get 35% off smalls plus an additional 50% off your first order by using the code explained. That's an additional 50% off when you head to smalls.com and use the promo code explained. Again. That's promo code explained for an additional 50% off your first order plus free shipping@smalls.com.
Andrew Prokop
Go from game time to having a good time with Corona Premiere. It's the only lighter than light beer worthy of being called corona. 90 calories, 2.6 carbs and an undeniably crisp, refreshing taste you can't help but share because with Corona Premiere, the best play happens off the field. Welcome to the premier side of light Corona Premiere.
Unnamed Advertiser
Drink responsibly.
Andrew Prokop
Corona Premier Beer imported by Crown Importance, Chicago, IL for 12 Fluid Ounce Serving Average Analysis Cows 90 carbs 2.6 grams protein 0.7 grams fat 0.0 grams this is today Explained. I'm Andrew Prokop, senior correspondent, Vox covering politics.
Noel King
All right at the moment, anyhow, President Trump seems to approve of Israel's attack on Iran. How does MAGA broadly feel about it?
Andrew Prokop
There's a very interesting split in the MAGA movement. You can see it in certain tweets, certain posts. But what's really happening is that a kind of new faction has formed on the right that is challenging the longtime Republican consensus on foreign policy. And we can think of this as the America first faction. I would say that the three most important people, the three people who have actually given it juice, are Tucker Carlson, J.D. vance and Donald Trump Jr.
Unnamed Analyst
So I'm just looking at it from an American perspective. I don't want my country to be further weakened, my fellow citizens to die yet again, my federal treasury to be drained yet again. On behalf of an idea that's clearly stupid.
Andrew Prokop
We should be putting the interests of our own citizens first. And if our government's making promises to other people, to other refugees, then let's be honest about it. But stop with these ridiculous platitudes cuz they don't actually mean anything unless there's substance behind it. I think my father has truly changed. You know, the Republican Party. I think it's the America First Party now, the MAGA party. However you want to look at it, the three of them came together around this kind of shared worldview that the previous Republican hawkish consensus on foreign policy is wrong and everything needed to be rethought and we should try hard to avoid getting sucked into any more forever wars.
Noel King
I want to talk about Tucker because Tucker's been out there giving good tape. He can obviously speak freely in a way that the Vice president maybe can't. You actually spoke to him. What's the argument that he's making Because.
Andrew Prokop
I interviewed him and we talked before Israel launched its strikes on Iran. And he said the most important thing to avoid would be the US Getting sucked into war with Iran. He says that it would just be disastrous, that we would lose.
Unnamed Analyst
It's hard to affect regime change in countries you're not from. It's hard to know what the consequences will be. We've tampered in that country extensively. It hasn't worked at all. It's been counterproductive.
Andrew Prokop
But the broader critique, it goes beyond just Israel or just Iran or even just Ukraine, which is the issue that Vance and Carlson and Don Jr. Originally came together around, opposing aid to Ukraine.
Unnamed Analyst
Our economy has degraded. The suicide rate has jumped. Public filth and disorder and crime have exponentially increased. And yet your concern is that the Ukrainians, a country most people can't find on a map, who've received tens of billions of US Tax dollars, don't have enough tanks? I think it's a fair question to ask, like, where's the concern for the United States in that?
Andrew Prokop
It's not just about Russia. It's not just about the Middle East. It's about the entire world. It's about whether the US should continue trying to basically engage in global superpower competition for a kind of world dominance against the powers it perceives as its rivals, or whether it needs to retreat back more to its own borders, focus on what's happening maybe in the Western Hemisphere. There's just a very deep doubt that getting involved in all of these foreign commitments, foreign alliances, possibly foreign conflicts will be good for the United States.
Noel King
Tucker Carlson has been talking about Iran. I've noticed for a while, even though all this with Iran just, you know, officially kicked off in the last week or so, do we know why Iran was prompting Tucker to talk before seven days ago or 10 days ago?
Andrew Prokop
Well, this really goes back to Trump's first term. If you remember, in the beginning of 2020, Trump had one of the top generals of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Qasem Soleimani, killed. And there was a moment of very high tension between the US And Iran. And this was a first term Trump following the counsel and the advice of the traditional hawks who are all gung ho for let's be tough. We're the strongest power. Let's reach out and confront Iran. They've been engaged in the shadow war with us, and we should do something about it. And at that time, Tucker was running shows basically urging Trump, step back from the brink. Don't let the hawks bring you into war with Iran. This would be a disaster.
Unnamed Analyst
It's harder to get rich and powerful in Washington during peacetime. So our leaders have a built in bias for war. And so they descended on television studios over the weekend to describe in detail the kind of violence they're prepared to wreak on a country very few of them know anything about.
Andrew Prokop
So, you know, this is a suspicion he's had for a while. It dates back to his loss of faith in the Iraq war, which can be dated back to about 2004. So we carry that forward into Trump's second term.
Noel King
Donald Trump, President Trump alienated, as you know, a lot of those old hawks from his first term. They're either not speaking or he's made clear that he doesn't want them anywhere near him. Who is representing that old guard in, in this term?
Andrew Prokop
You know, it's kind of the longstanding Republican establishment in the staffer class and in Congress as well. I think one very clear look at who is a hawk is that in the Senate there was a letter that said any deal with Iran should allow no nuclear enrichment by Iran. That's a very hawkish position. And every single Republican senator except for Rand Paul sign that letter. And that's a sign that the hawks continue to have really deep support within the Republican Party, certainly among elected officials, definitely among the longtime Republican staff. And the challenge to it is really kind of more on the MAGA right media voices and a kind of upstart group of advocates, influencers and younger staffers. But there's always been in the broader right this other strand that has sometimes been called isolationism. It goes back to World War I, World War II. There were people on the right arguing hard against U.S. involvement in both of those wars.
Nahal Toosi
Another war, not for me this time. America should keep out, and I know I will if war breaks out in Europe. I think that this country should heed the advice of its vice president and avoid all foreign entanglements.
Andrew Prokop
But they kept losing in the end, the arguments. And in the Cold War, they lost the argument. There was a brief resurgence of isolationism in the 90s after the Cold War ended. People on the right were like, hey, why are we doing all this stuff in other countries now that communism has been defeated, they call us isolationists. Well, if they mean I intend to isolate America from all the bloody territorial.
Unnamed Analyst
Tribal and ethnic wars of the 21st.
Nahal Toosi
Century, I plead guilty.
Andrew Prokop
But then 9, 11 put the hawks in charge again. It seemingly proved that, like, if we don't pay attention to what's happening abroad, we don't act Aggressively, then we are going to get our own people killed. And Carlson has been really engaged in a project to create an alternative to that way of thinking that would catch on among the MAGA base, as well as develop alliances with a new network of professional policymakers who can take jobs in the Trump administration and jobs that would have gone to these typical hawks.
Noel King
Hmm. So both of these sides are trying to influence President Trump and his decision making. He at the moment, as we said, he's celebrating Israel today right now. Does that mean that the hawks have got the upper hand here in terms of who is closest to what the President is thinking?
Andrew Prokop
You know, it keeps changing, this battle between the two factions, which is very intense, very bitter, and very personal about the hawks versus the America Firsters. Like there are warring leaks trying to get people fired, and it keeps varying kind of who's on top. It looked for a while like Trump was really leaning against the hawks. A bunch of hawks got fired from the National Security Council in the staff as well.
Noel King
Now to a big shakeup at the White House. Officials announcing the firing of potentially more.
Andrew Prokop
Than 100 members of the National Security Council.
Noel King
Sources say the decision came after President Trump met with far right activist Laura Loomer, who made the recommendations on who to fire.
Andrew Prokop
There was that moment when J.D. vance kind of humiliated Ukrainian President Zelensky.
Nahal Toosi
Have you said thank you once?
Andrew Prokop
I think the thing about Trump is that he is, on many issues, not an ideologue. He's really drawn towards what will make him look good. And so you saw at first this caution about the Israeli strike. We wanted to stay away from it, but when it started looking like it was very successful, Trump started taking credit for it. And so that is, I think, the biggest danger to the America Firsters. If this military option is seen by Trump as having worked, at least in the short term, he's going to be tempted to associate himself more and more closely with it.
Noel King
Does President Trump have a vision for American foreign policy beyond what's good for.
Andrew Prokop
Me, I think he has instincts, he has things he wants. I don't think he has a vision or an ideology at all, really. He's flexible. But, you know, one thing where he is quite different from the America Firsters or the isolationists is that he doesn't want to withdraw the US Entirely from the world. He does have this skepticism of overseas military commitments and worry about foreign wars that might go badly. But he's going to the Middle East. He's making deals with Saudi Arabia, with the United Arab Emirates. He wants to continue this global engagement. He's involved in these talks between Russia and Ukraine involving Israel and its rivals or enemies in the region. And so he, like some people have speculated, he wants a Nobel Prize. You know, he wants to be on the global stage. He doesn't want to withdraw and just focus on America.
Noel King
Vox correspondent Andrew Prokop. His article took weeks of reporting. It's called the Surprising Right Wing Push to Keep Us out of War. You can find it@vox.com, andrew, thank you so much.
Andrew Prokop
Thanks so much for having me.
Noel King
Avishai Artsy produced today's show. Jolie Myers edited We were fact checked by Laura Bullard and engineered by Patrick Boyd and Andrea Christensdotter. I'm Noel King. It's Today Explained Nobody knows your customers better than your team, so give them the power to make standout content with Adobe Express.
Andrew Prokop
Brand kits make following design rules a.
Noel King
Breeze and Adobe quality templates make it easy to create pro looking flyers, social posts, presentations and more. You don't have to be a designer to edit campaigns, resize ads and translate content. Anyone can in a click and collaboration.
Andrew Prokop
Tools put feedback right where you need it.
Noel King
See how you can turn your team into a content machine with Adobe Express, the quick and easy app to create on brand content. Learn more@adobe.com express business support for the show comes from Charles Schwab at Schwab. How you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices.
Nahal Toosi
You can can invest and trade on.
Noel King
Your own plus get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award winning service, low costs and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more.
Today, Explained – Episode Summary: "Iran, Israel, and Trump"
Release Date: June 17, 2025 | Host: Noel King and Sean Rameswaram
In this episode of Today, Explained, hosts Noel King and Sean Rameswaram delve into the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, the United States' ambiguous stance under President Trump, and the internal divisions within the MAGA movement regarding potential American involvement in the conflict. The discussion provides a comprehensive analysis of the geopolitical tensions, the motivations behind recent military actions, and the implications for U.S. foreign policy.
Noel King opens the conversation by highlighting that it is the fifth day of deadly exchanges between Israel and Iran. He references President Trump's recent statement from Air Force One:
"The US is not looking for a ceasefire. We're looking for better than a ceasefire." (00:01)
This assertion indicates Trump's administration's desire for a more definitive resolution to the conflict beyond temporary halts in hostilities.
Nahal Toosi, Vox's senior foreign affairs correspondent, elaborates on Israel's strategic motivations:
"Israel has long seen Iran's regime, especially its nuclear program and its ballistic missile program, as an existential threat to the state of Israel." (02:14)
She explains that Israel perceives the current vulnerability of Iran due to ongoing regional conflicts as an opportune moment to intensify attacks, targeting key Iranian infrastructure and military leadership, including the assassination of Hossein Salami, head of the Revolutionary Guard Corps.
President Trump's mixed messaging reflects uncertainty within his administration about U.S. involvement. Noel King notes:
"Trump hasn't clarified whether the US will get involved in this conflict." (00:21)
Nahal Toosi discusses the U.S.'s defensive role, mentioning reports of American assistance in intercepting Iranian missiles and protecting American troops in the region:
"On the defensive end, the US is certainly involved, but to my knowledge, the United States has not been actively involved in the offensive portion of this attack." (06:34)
However, the potential for increased involvement remains if Iran targets American interests directly.
The ongoing hostilities have put the U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations on hold. Nahal Toosi emphasizes the fraught nature of these talks:
"The Iranians are reaching out... they still want to maintain the right to enrich uranium, which President Trump has said he doesn't want to allow." (07:29)
She underscores the deep mistrust between the two nations, particularly Israel's skepticism about the efficacy and sufficiency of any potential agreement.
A significant portion of the episode focuses on the split within the MAGA movement between traditional hawkish Republicans and the emerging "America First" faction advocating for isolationism.
Andrew Prokop, Vox’s senior correspondent, outlines the factions:
"The America Firsters believe we should retreat back more to our own borders, focus on what's happening maybe in the Western Hemisphere." (18:02)
He highlights key figures such as Tucker Carlson, J.D. Vance, and Donald Trump Jr., who champion the isolationist perspective, arguing against further foreign entanglements:
"We should be putting the interests of our own citizens first." (15:14)
In contrast, traditional hawks within the Republican establishment continue to support active U.S. engagement abroad, emphasizing national security and global leadership.
The internal battle within the MAGA movement has led to significant personnel changes in the White House. Noel King reports on the firing of over 100 National Security Council members following a meeting between President Trump and far-right activist Laura Loomer:
"Sources say the decision came after President Trump met with far-right activist Laura Loomer, who made the recommendations on who to fire." (24:04)
Andrew Prokop explains that this upheaval reflects the ongoing struggle between hawkish advisors and the "America First" faction, with Trump's allegiance shifting based on immediate political gains:
"If this military option is seen by Trump as having worked, at least in the short term, he's going to be tempted to associate himself more and more closely with it." (24:07)
When questioned about his overarching foreign policy strategy, Andrew Prokop shares insights into Trump's approach:
"He doesn't want to withdraw the US entirely from the world... he wants to continue this global engagement." (25:06)
Despite skepticism from isolationist factions, Trump appears committed to maintaining U.S. influence in key regions, engaging in diplomatic efforts, and forging alliances, all while balancing internal pressures within his administration.
This episode of Today, Explained provides an in-depth examination of the complex interplay between Iran and Israel, the United States' precarious position under President Trump, and the ideological rifts within the MAGA movement. The hosts effectively dissect the motivations behind military actions, the challenges of diplomatic negotiations, and the potential trajectories of U.S. foreign policy amidst internal and external pressures.
Notable Quotes:
President Trump: "The US is not looking for a ceasefire. We're looking for better than a ceasefire." (00:01)
Nahal Toosi: "Israel has long seen Iran's regime... as an existential threat to the state of Israel." (02:14)
Andrew Prokop: "We should be putting the interests of our own citizens first." (15:14)
Andrew Prokop: "He [Trump] doesn't want to withdraw the US entirely from the world." (25:06)
For those interested in the full discussion and further analysis, listen to the episode of "Today, Explained" available on the Vox Media Podcast Network.