Make America Uninsured Again

Summary

Today, Explained: "Make America Uninsured Again" – Detailed Summary

Episode Release Date: July 2, 2025 | Hosts: Sean Rameswaram & Noel King | Produced by Vox

---

1. Passage of Trump's Legislative Agenda

The episode opens with Noel King announcing a pivotal moment in American politics:

[00:00] Noel King: "Yesterday's Senate vote to pass President Trump's legislative agenda means it's now in the House's hands, and Senator John Fetterman can finally go."

This marks the Senate's approval of a comprehensive bill, setting the stage for its consideration in the House of Representatives.

---

2. Breakdown of the Legislative Bill

Burgess Everett delves into the intricacies of the 900+ page legislative package:

[02:18] Burgess Everett: "Oh boy. It's hard to quantify... a lot of people are calling it a mega bill. It's designed to extend the Trump tax cuts from 2017."

The bill not only prolongs existing tax cuts but also incorporates President Trump's tax promises, including:

• Permanent Extension of Lower Tax Rates: Ensuring continued tax relief for individuals and businesses.
• Enhanced Child Tax Credit: Increasing support for families with children.

However, these provisions necessitate substantial spending offsets:

[03:14] Jonathan Chait: "That means permanently extending the lower tax rates, permanently extending the increased standard deduction... but enhancing it even further."

To balance the budget, the bill introduces significant cuts, primarily targeting Medicaid:

[03:27] Burgess Everett: "Conservatives insisted on paying for some of this. And the way they did that is essentially cutting Medicaid to the tune of nearly a trillion dollars overall."

---

3. Impact on Medicaid and Health Insurance

The crux of the bill lies in its approach to Medicaid:

[00:12] Noel King: "It was a tight vote lot to fight about in 900 plus pages, but the loudest fight was over Medicaid... the bill uses new work requirements and cuts to Medicaid to do that."

Key Consequences:

• Loss of Health Insurance: The Congressional Budget Office estimates that approximately 12 million people could lose their health coverage over the next decade.
• Work Requirements: Aimed at reducing dependency, these requirements mandate Medicaid recipients to engage in work or specific activities to remain eligible.

Burgess Everett emphasizes the human toll:

[04:55] Burgess Everett: "Why? So I can get a tax cut."

---

4. Republican Party's Internal Divisions

The passage of this bill has not been without controversy within the Republican ranks. Notable dissenters include:

• Susan Collins: A moderate Republican opposing Medicaid cuts.
• Thom Tillis: Announced his retirement amidst frustration over the bill's provisions.

[06:40] Jonathan Chait: "What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid?"

• Rand Paul: A libertarian-leaning senator who opposed the extent of the bill's fiscal measures.

[07:25] Jonathan Chait: "The main thing that I object to is raising the debt ceiling 4 or $5 trillion."

The episode highlights that only a handful of Republicans voice opposition, underscoring deep fractures within the party.

---

5. Historical Failures of Medicaid Work Requirements

Examining past implementations, the hosts discuss the detrimental effects witnessed in states like Arkansas and Georgia:

• Arkansas Experiment (2018):

[20:04] Jonathan Chait: "You had to file paperwork with the government every month proving that you were working or... going to school."

Outcomes:

• 18,000 People Lost Insurance: Due to bureaucratic hurdles and system failures.

• Judicial Rejection: Federal courts struck down these work requirements as unconstitutional.

• Georgia's Attempt:

[21:33] Jonathan Chait: "It was the same thing all over again... thousands and thousands of people losing their health insurance."

These failures are presented as cautionary tales against the current bill's approach.

---

6. Political Ramifications and Republican Strategy

The episode explores the broader political implications of the bill:

• GOP's Working-Class Base: Many of Trump's supporters, particularly from the working class, are jeopardized by the Medicaid cuts.

[10:44] Burgess Everett: "The Republicans are betting that the tax cuts... are going to be seen by people a lot more vividly than these future cuts to Medicaid program."

• Potential Electoral Consequences:

[17:38] Noel King: "There are Republican senators who appear to understand this... Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced he's not gonna run for reelection."

• Josh Hawley's Stance: Despite initial support, Hawley expresses concern over constituents' welfare:

[18:01] Burgess Everett: "We cannot let people like my daughter lose her benefits."

The internal conflict signals potential challenges for the GOP in maintaining its coalition.

---

7. Critique of Republican Rhetoric on Medicaid

Jonathan Chait provides a critical analysis of the Republican narrative surrounding Medicaid:

[15:55] Jonathan Chait: "There are Republican elected officials and other elites in the Republican Party who have always hated Medicaid, have always hated social insurance programs in general."

He argues that the party's approach is contradictory and dismissive of the program's popularity:

[16:35] Burgess Everett: "Get to the defense."

[16:38] Burgess Everett: "You got to face facts. You got to face a hard reality."

---

8. Predictions and Future Outlook

Looking ahead, the hosts discuss the potential fallout if the bill proceeds:

• Health Insurance Cascade:

[07:40] Noel King: "If this bill does pass the House... what happens next?"

[24:37] Noel King: "If this bill does pass the House, if these cuts to Medicaid go through, what happens next?"

Consequences:

• Rural Hospitals in Jeopardy: Losing millions of patients threatens their financial stability.
• Public Health Decline: A substantial rollback in health coverage could lead to widespread health crises.

[24:44] Jonathan Chait: "This would be an absolutely gigantic rollback in health coverage and public health in the United States."

Politically, the GOP may face backlash similar to what Democrats experienced post-Affordable Care Act:

[10:44] Burgess Everett: "You see the polling for this bill. It's not great."

---

9. Conclusion: A Precarious Future for Health Insurance in America

The episode wraps up by emphasizing the monumental impact of the bill:

[17:20] Jonathan Chait: "It's an opportunity to make that vision closer to reality."

However, the severe repercussions on millions and the potential political fallout present a precarious future for the Republican Party and the nation's healthcare system.

Final Note:

[25:33] Noel King: "This is Today Explained."

---

Key Takeaways:

• The Senate has passed a significant legislative bill spearheaded by President Trump, now awaiting House approval.
• Central to the bill are permanent tax cuts and substantial Medicaid reductions, potentially disenfranchising 12 million Americans.
• Internal divisions within the Republican Party highlight the contentious nature of these provisions.
• Historical attempts at implementing Medicaid work requirements have led to widespread disenrollment and legal challenges.
• The GOP faces significant political risks as its policies may alienate its working-class base, jeopardizing future electoral prospects.

---

This summary encapsulates the critical discussions and insights from the "Make America Uninsured Again" episode of Today, Explained, providing a comprehensive overview for those unfamiliar with the full podcast.

Transcript

[Noel King]

Yesterday's Senate vote to pass President Trump's legislative agenda means it's now in the House's hands, and Senator John Fetterman can finally go.

[Burgess Everett]

I've missed our entire trip to the beach. My family's gonna be back.

[Noel King]

It was a tight vote lot to fight about in 900 plus pages, but the loudest fight was over Medicaid. Trump's tax cuts had to be paid for, and the bill uses new work requirements and cuts to Medicaid to do that. The Congressional Budget Office estimates around 12 million people could lose their health insurance in the next decade. Ezra Klein is so mad.

[Burgess Everett]

You gu when they get sick, they will not be able to get chemotherapy.

[Jonathan Chait]

Or they will have to go into.

[Burgess Everett]

Medical debt to get chemotherapy. Like, why? So I can get a tax cut.

[Noel King]

The fact is that in the 2024 election, President Trump got a huge share of the working class vote, so many of his voters risk losing their insurance now, a thing that some Republicans had copped to then voted for it. Anyway, that's all ahead on Today Explained.

[Burgess Everett]

Avoiding your unfinished home projects because you're not sure where to start. Thumbtack knows homes so you don't have to don't know the difference between matte paint finish and satin or what that clunking sound from your dryer is. With thumbtack, you don't have to be a home pro, you just have to hire one. You can hire top rated pros, see price estimates and read reviews all on the app. Download today.

[Noel King]

This is the way it feels to move through summer in Lululemon iconic aligned softness. Without the front seam for our smoothest look and feel ever, Summer won't know what hit it. Stretch your limits in the non stop flexibility of the new Lululemon Align no line pant in select stores [e-mail] the.

[Burgess Everett]

House will be in order. The clerk may call the roll today.

[Noel King]

Yay. Explained. Yay. I'm Noel King with Burgess Everett. He's the Congressional bureau Chief for semaphore. Burgess. 900 plus pages. What's in it?

[Burgess Everett]

Oh boy. It's hard to quantify and that's a challenge we've all been dealing with as journalists because writers have to describe things quickly. A lot of people are calling it a mega bill. It's designed to extend the Trump tax cuts from 2017. So that's the underpinning to the bill. It also includes President Trump's tax promises or some version of them, which would be reducing taxes on overtime on tips.

[Jonathan Chait]

No tax on tips, no tax on.

[Burgess Everett]

TIPS and on older Americans, they can't really do it for Social Security recipients, but they did kind of find a workaround from there. You had to find spending offsets because all that stuff costs trillions of dollars. Because they didn't just extend these tax cuts, cuts that are expiring, they made them permanent. They also made these business tax cuts permanent.

[Jonathan Chait]

That means permanently extending the lower tax rates, permanently extending the increased standard deduction, and not only permanently extending the enhanced child tax credit, but enhancing it even further.

[Burgess Everett]

And so conservatives insisted on paying for some of this. And the way they did that is essentially cutting Medicaid to the tune of nearly a trillion dollars overall. Some of its work requirements, some of its cuts to this funding mechanism called the provider tax. And then there was also a bunch of cuts to mostly President Biden's energy subsidies from the Inflation Reduction act, which was passed in a similar fashion three years ago.

[Noel King]

The thing that is making a lot of news, all of this is making a lot of news, but in particular cuts to Medicaid because many Americans will lose their health insurance. What was the argument for making cuts to Medicaid and institut work requirements?

[Burgess Everett]

Well, the work requirements piece, I think Republicans felt like that was the most defensible. They've sort of created this image that everybody that's using the Affordable Care Acts Medicaid expansion, a lot of people are able bodied adults that are sitting at home and not working when they could be working.

[Jonathan Chait]

So it's just leaning on that old.

[Noel King]

Chestnut that those, it's a bigoted chestnut that those who receive Medicaid are in some ways unwilling to work or in some ways lazy.

[Burgess Everett]

I'm sure that describes a certain amount of people doing it. I'm sure there's lots of other people that are trying to work, finding jobs, having a hard time getting health insurance that are absolutely doing their best and not trying to be lazy. So that, that's one piece of it. The other piece is that these cuts don't go into effect right away. So the Medicaid work requirements are fairly quick. But these other changes, they don't take effect for years. And so I think one thing that I think people are missing is that I think a lot of these cuts are going to be delayed, delayed, delayed, especially if Democrats take charge either in 2026 or in 2028. I think you'll see a lot of a big attempt on a lot of these things being reversed. And look no further than Josh Hawley, the Missouri Republican who said in the same breath he said he was voting for this bill, said that he was going to do everything he could to keep the Medicaid cuts on the provider tax from going through.

[Noel King]

All right, so even after the passage, we've been reading about deep divisions. Josh Hawley is a man divided against himself. Republicans voted against this bill.

[Burgess Everett]

And why three Republicans? For three different reasons. Most people know Susan Collins. She's a moderate Republican. She's up for reelection in 2026. She hated the Medicaid cuts. She liked the tax cuts overall. She was trying to even raise taxes on the highest earners to pay for a larger hospital. They call it a stabilization fund. It's really like a bailout for hospitals that are getting hurt by this bill in the future.

[Noel King]

Rural hospitals, specifically our rural and nursing.

[Jonathan Chait]

Homes, are under great financial strain right now.

[Burgess Everett]

That did not pass. I think if it had passed, she might have entertained voting for the bill because that would have also raised money. And we were talking 25 million people who earn 25, $50 million a year, like really high earners. Other person's. Thom Tillis in that bucket. He was so stressed by this entire episode. He announced his retirement in the middle of it on Sunday. He did not like the Medicaid cuts.

[Jonathan Chait]

What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid?

[Burgess Everett]

So President Trump started attacking him. He just had enough and quit on Sunday and said, I'm not running for reelection. I've never seen somebody denounce their retirement in the middle of something like this. The third one is Rand Paul from Kentucky, kind of this purist libertarian leaning Republican. He was actually in play at the end. Republicans were trying to choose kind of which path do we take. Do we try to get Lisa Murkowski, give her a lot of Alaska specific things, or do we go to Rand Paul, who wanted a much lower debt ceiling increase?

[Jonathan Chait]

Well, the main thing that I object to is raising the debt ceiling 4 or $5 trillion.

[Burgess Everett]

Ultimately, leadership wanted to work with Murkowski more and found that deal better. But Rand Paul was in play right up until the end.

[Noel King]

Some people are saying that Senator John Thune is a big part of how this got done. You interviewed him yesterday. What did you find from him?

[Burgess Everett]

The thing about John Thune that people should know, he's not a household name. I don't know if he'll ever be. Sometimes you're a majority leader and you become just a villain or a hero to the people in your party. I think Mitch McConnell at times was A hero for Republicans and at other times was a villain. John Thune is probably more fiscally conservative than Mitch McConnell, but his demeanor is very Midwestern. He's from South Dakota.

[Jonathan Chait]

And I want to start by thanking the staff on the committees, the relevant committees, the floor staff.

[Burgess Everett]

He's super nice and personable. Not to make myself part of the story, but he was probably the first senator, along with Senator Schumer, to learn my name in covering Capitol Hill, which is the kind of thing you remember when you have no idea what you're doing at the start of your career. And Senator Thune wrote a book, more Conservative Bill, I think, than a lot of his members thought that was going to happen. They thought he was going to essentially copy the framework of the House and be more gentle on the Inflation Reduction act tax credits and be more gentle on Medicaid. And he went the opposite way. He stuck with it. He just kept. Kept pushing forward, and he eventually paid off. It's a big political risk. It could certainly put his majority in play, if not in 2026 and certainly in 2028. But he really believed in the policy.

[Jonathan Chait]

And.

[Burgess Everett]

And I think it's a testament to the fact he was able to get this done on a totally artificial deadline, that his leadership style was somewhat vindicated, I think, by this whole episode, even as messy as it was, the results are going to be what's remembered.

[Noel King]

How does Thune answer those hard questions about we're increasing the national debt, we're raising the deficit? These are not typically Republican priorities.

[Burgess Everett]

Well, if you look at history, Republicans are much more deficit hawks when they're in the minority and when there's a Democrat president than when they're in power. I think he would argue this bill's. All the scores and estimates of this don't capture the growth that'll come from this bill. It's an argument that Republicans have made for a long time. I can't say whether he's right or not, but I do think that if you look at the nonpartisan scorekeeper from Congress that both parties are supposed to rely on, the Congressional Budget Office, they say this bill is going to explode the deficit, mostly from extending those tax cuts, especially permanently and not really paying for them.

[Noel King]

All right, so the bill is likely to become law. And then the risk is, as you've alluded to, the bill could become a nightmare for the gop. Americans losing their health insurance, realizing wealthy people got tax breaks that they didn't. Many of these Americans voted for President Trump. His base shifted in the last election to include many more working class people. How does the party mitigate these kinds of risks?

[Burgess Everett]

It's likely to be a political loser in the short term, perhaps it's not in the long term. The Republicans are betting that the tax cuts, which go into effect quickly, are going to be seen by people a lot more vividly than these future cuts to Medicaid program. We'll see if they're right. I think the 2026 election, if Democrats are able to frame it the right way, could be simply about Medicaid cuts versus tax cuts. And I'm not sure that Republicans are going to win that argument in the short term. I think it's going to be really challenging and I think they know that. You see the polling for this bill. It's not great. So now can they put their money where their mouth is, spend a lot of ads on this and get people to believe it's a good bill? It's certainly possible, but most of the time the majority party pays little bit of a political price after passing a big piece of legislation like this. You don't have to go back too far. The passage of the Affordable Care act was dogging Democrats for years and years.

[Noel King]

Burgess Everett of Semaphore Coming up, the millions of people who could lose their health insurance as a result of this bill.

[Burgess Everett]

Like why? So I can get a tax cut.

[Jonathan Chait]

Foreign.

[Noel King]

Support for Today explained Comes from Shopify. If you have a business idea or just an idea of some something you want to sell, you won't get far without the right tools. But you can start with Shopify, says Shopify Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of online stores around the world and they say 10% of all E commerce in the US from household names such as Mattel and Gymshark to brands just getting started. Their design studio lets you build an online store that matches your style. You can choose from ready made templates or you can use their helpful AI tools. Shopify says that you can create email and social media campaigns with ease and meet your customers where they're at. If you're ready to sell, you can be ready for Shopify. You can turn your big business idea into reality with Shopify on your side. You can sign up for a $1 per month trial and and start selling today at shopify.com explained. Go to shopify.com explained shopify.com explained.

[Burgess Everett]

With.

[Noel King]

A Venmo debit card you can Venmo.

[Jonathan Chait]

More than just your friends. You can use your balance in so many ways. You can Venmo everything need gas?

[Noel King]

You can Venmo this.

[Jonathan Chait]

How about snacks? You can Venmo that. Your favorite band's merch. You can Venmo this or their next show.

[Noel King]

You can Venmo that. Visit Venmo Me Debit to learn more.

[Jonathan Chait]

You can Venmo this or you can Venmo that.

[Noel King]

You can Venmo.

[Jonathan Chait]

The Venmo MasterCard is issued by the Bancorp bank and a.

[Noel King]

Pursuant to license by MasterCard International Incorporated.

[Jonathan Chait]

Card may be used everywhere MasterCard is accepted. Venmo purchase restrictions apply. Shop 4th of July Savings at the Home Depot right now and get up to 40% off plus up to an extra $600 off select appliances with free delivery like Samsung. From all in one washer dryers to smart refrigerators. Upgrade to tech you can trust with Samsung appliances. The Home Depot has what you need to simplify your routine. Don't miss 4th of July appliance savings at the Home Depot. Free delivery on appliance purchases of $396 or more offer valid June 18 through July 9, US only. See store or online for details. This is TODAY explained.

[Noel King]

Jonathan Chait is a writer for the Atlantic. Jonathan, you recently wrote for the Atlantic that the Republican Party is engaging in magical thinking around Medicaid. What did you mean?

[Jonathan Chait]

Well, you have different people within the Republican Party. You have people who are not straightforwardly arguing that they are trying to reduce the Medicaid rolls and push people off the program. We're trying to make structural reforms that.

[Noel King]

Make these programs stronger and make them be able to actually last and be there for the people who need that assistance. We want these to be. We want them to be safety nets.

[Jonathan Chait]

Not hammocks that people need.

[Burgess Everett]

There are no Medicaid cuts in the big beautiful bill. We're not cutting Medicaid. What we're doing is strengthening the program. We're reducing fraud, waste and abuse that is rampant in Medicaid. They are not eligible, so they will be coming off.

[Jonathan Chait]

So people are not well, we all.

[Noel King]

Are going to die, even though that.

[Jonathan Chait]

Is the obvious and unavoidable effect of the policies that they're enacting. And the reason for that is that Medicaid is very popular, including among their own base, Republicans themselves. That is, Republican voters don't want to cut the Medicaid program, and Donald Trump has attracted a lot of people who are on Medicaid into the Republican coalition. So it's a very politically dangerous move for them to make to cut Medicaid. Nonetheless, Republican elected officials and other elites in the Republican Party have always hated Medicaid, have always hated social insurance programs in general, and wished that they could cut them.

[Burgess Everett]

The sad truth is that our welfare system represents one long and sorry tale of disappointment. So Medicaid, sending it back to the states, capping its growth rate. We've been dreaming of this since I've been around, since you and I were.

[Noel King]

Drinking at a keg.

[Jonathan Chait]

So their solution to this dilemma, being caught between the desires of their own voters and what their own elected officials want, is to simply pretend that they're not doing what they're actually doing. Steve Bannon, the White House adviser, has warned the administration against cutting Medicaid, saying a lot of MAGAs are on Medicaid. They don't want to be on Medicaid, but they're on Medicaid. You can't be cutting that until you.

[Burgess Everett]

Get to the defense.

[Jonathan Chait]

You got to get across the Potomac.

[Burgess Everett]

You got to face facts. You got to face a hard reality.

[Jonathan Chait]

One of the ways that American politics has changed over the past 10, 20 years and especially accelerated in the Trump era, is that Republicans have won over higher numbers of low income people into their coalition. And an effect of that is that a pretty large percentage of people who are on Medicaid voted for Donald Trump in the last election and stand to lose. And that's reflected in the polling. Republicans do not want to cut Medicaid.

[Burgess Everett]

The big majority of working class voters voted for the gop. That means now the GOP needs to deliver for them. And we do that by giving them tax relief. We do that by bringing down their health care bills. We don't do it by cutting Medicaid.

[Jonathan Chait]

It used to be 20 or 30 years ago, a program that Republicans felt at least a little bit safe going after because they saw it as benefiting Democrats and not benefiting them. But that's not the case anymore. So it's really a program that covers not only a lot of Americans, but also a lot of Trump voters.

[Noel King]

There are Republican senators who appear to understand this. Thom Tillis of North Carolina announced he's not gonna run for reelection. He cited his frustration with Medicaid cuts.

[Burgess Everett]

Republicans are about to make a mistake on health care and betraying a promise.

[Noel King]

Josh Hawley is another one. He's been speaking on behalf of one of his constituents who's a mother of five children, one of whom is very sick.

[Burgess Everett]

And it's just wrong to go and cut their health care when they're trying to make ends meet, trying to help their kids. We cannot let people like my daughter lose her benefits. And if anybody tells you that, oh.

[Noel King]

She'S, she's covered, she's protected, I would.

[Burgess Everett]

Really encourage you to say how Josh.

[Noel King]

Hawley ultimately voted for this thing. But why are there not more and louder voices in the party? Why is it only a handful of Republicans who seem to understand this is existential? These are our constituents who voted us into office.

[Jonathan Chait]

I think it's a combination of them not really understanding how the changes work and kind of falling for the Republican spin that they're not really throwing people off the program and some of them know what they're doing and support it. You have a really long tradition in the Republican Party of rejecting the welfare state, believing that giving people access to health care is not the government's job.

[Burgess Everett]

It's now common knowledge that our welfare system has itself become a poverty trap.

[Jonathan Chait]

A creator and reinforcer of dependency. That if you want to get health care, you should pick yourself up by your bootstraps and get yourself a job that provides health insurance. That it's not the government's role to make sure that people can get, go to the doctor and get medicine. That's their own responsibility. And they see this as an opportunity to make that vision closer to reality.

[Noel King]

So the Senate bill is going to place work requirements on Medicaid recipients. Arkansas experimented with this in 2018. How did that experiment turn out? What happened?

[Jonathan Chait]

What happened was the work requirements were incredibly onerous for people to get through.

[Burgess Everett]

I thought that everything was good about this. I thought it was just a one time deal that you reported and then that was it. It's very cumbersome to get into certain areas of the website and sometimes it's not even working because they do a lot of updates.

[Jonathan Chait]

You had to file paperwork with the government every month proving that you were working or you were looking for work or going to school or doing a list of activities that made you eligible for Medicaid. And this required going through a website or a phone system that was hard to work, that was hard to reach, it was often down, it was unavailable, or people couldn't get the information they needed to verify what they were trying to file. For the government, it was sort of like filing a tax return when you're being audited by the irs, but you have to do it every single month. Just incredibly difficult process for people to go through. So what happened was lots of, lots of people who were actually supposed to be eligible for Medicaid lost their eligibility because they couldn't get through the paperwork requirements or they couldn't get into the system into the phone system or into the web system. So just thousands and thousands of people lost their health insurance, couldn't go to the doctor, or they'd show up at the doctor and they'd learn that the doctor, you know, wouldn't take their Medicaid because they weren't on the program anymore. So it was a real social disaster.

[Burgess Everett]

In Arkansas, early implementation of work requirements led to 18,000 people losing their health insurance.

[Noel King]

The federal judge has struck down the work requirements for Arkansas's Medicaid beneficiaries. All right, so Arkansas turned into a social disaster. Georgia also experimented with work requirements. What happened there?

[Jonathan Chait]

It was basically even worse.

[Noel King]

Huh?

[Jonathan Chait]

It was the same thing all over again. The work requirements were just as difficult to get through, if not more so. You had thousands and thousands of people losing their health insurance, people who were eligible. And researchers who looked at both states found it did not promote work at all, that the stated intent of this policy was to encourage people to get a job who were unwilling to work by threatening, but to take away their Medicaid if they didn't. But it did absolutely nothing to encourage employment. In fact, reporters found some examples of the opposite happening. They found people who were working, were on Medicaid, lost their Medicaid because they couldn't get through the paperwork requirements, got sick, couldn't work as a result of getting sick, and didn't have treatment for Medicaid, and now were physically unable to work.

[Noel King]

Our leading Republicans, the ones speaking out in favor of Medicaid cuts, are they aware of what happened in Georgia and Arkansas?

[Jonathan Chait]

That's a really good question.

[Noel King]

Yeah.

[Jonathan Chait]

You know, I haven't seen anyone on the right engaging with what happened in Arkansas and Georgia. Anyway, I can't prove it doesn't exist because you can't prove a negative. But I've actually been fascinated by that same question. Why are they replicating a policy that has failed so clearly by its own standards? And I read conservative media a lot. I read it every single day. I haven't seen a single reference to the way this program operated in those states that tried to explain why it was a success. They just insist that it's going to do what they say it'll do. They just say, what's wrong with making people work to get their Medicaid? And going on as if it will obviously work the way it's supposed to. So, yeah, it's very puzzling.

[Noel King]

President Trump sat in the Oval Office in May and he said casually, but it seemed sincerely that maybe rich Americans should pay a Little bit more in taxes. This bill, in various ways, including the cuts to Medicaid, does exactly the opposite of that. Do you think that Donald Trump wants to do things for this new low income base that helped vote him into office in 2024?

[Jonathan Chait]

I think Donald Trump is much less committed to policy goals than Republicans in Congress are. He cares a lot more about being popular.

[Noel King]

Huh?

[Jonathan Chait]

But, and so for that reason, I think he's willing to compromise on policy goals in order to do the popular thing. But I think he cares most about just getting this bill passed. And Republicans don't want to raise taxes on the rich. They believe with religious fervor that raising taxes on the rich is a sin, is immoral, and they refuse to do it. And I think Donald Trump has recognized that. And he recognizes that he's not going to pass anything through Congress if it raises taxes on the rich. And he cares about passing something. So he's abandoned that goal.

[Noel King]

If this bill does pass the House, if these cuts to Medicaid go through, what happens next?

[Jonathan Chait]

What happens next is that you'll get cascading effects to people's health insurance and to the financial well being of a lot of hospitals, especially rural ones. Rural hospitals are in much worse shape than urban hospitals, although there are hospitals that are struggling all around the country. And if the hospitals lose millions of paying customers who can no longer reimburse them for health care, those hospitals are going to be in bad shape. And roughly 12 million people are slated to lose their health insurance as a result of this bill. So this would be an absolutely gigantic rollback in health coverage and public health in the United States. Really something that's totally unprecedented.

[Noel King]

Jonathan Chait of the Atlantic, he's been writing about Medicaid. Denise Guerra produced today's show. Aminah El Saadi edited. Laura Bullard checks the facts. Andrea Christian's daughter and Patrick Boyd engineered and I am Noel King and this is Today Explained.