Palantir has your info

Summary

Today, Explained Episode: Palantir Has Your Info Release Date: June 12, 2025 Hosts: Noel King and Sean Rameswaram
Published by: Vox Media Podcast Network

---

Introduction: Palantir’s Expanding Influence

In this episode of Today, Explained, hosts Noel King and Sean Rameswaram delve into the intricate web of data aggregation orchestrated by Palantir, a prominent data analytics company. With a 15-year history of collaboration with the U.S. government, Palantir has recently secured a $30 million contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to enhance the targeting and surveillance of undocumented immigrants. The conversation quickly escalates to the Trump administration's ambitious plan to unify all government data on citizens—a move that has ignited widespread concern about privacy and governmental overreach.

Notable Quote:
Noel King (00:02): “The data analytics company Palantir has been working with the US government for about 15 years on all sorts of things...”

---

Palantir’s Partnership with the US Government

Palantir’s collaboration with the government began in the context of military and intelligence operations, particularly during the wars in the Middle East and the war on terror. The company’s technology was pivotal in processing vast amounts of disparate data, such as IED locations and bomb-maker fingerprints, enabling more effective countermeasures against emerging threats.

Notable Quote:
Alex Karp (16:23): “Palantir has been working with the US government for a very, very long time...”

As Palantir expanded into local and state law enforcement agencies, its most consequential partnership emerged with ICE. The company has been instrumental in developing tools that consolidate data from various sources—Social Security numbers, addresses, personal information—to streamline ICE’s enforcement activities.

Notable Quote:
Alex Karp (17:20): “The military's begging for it after then. Obviously that's very much a defense and an intelligence agency in a military context...”

---

Privacy Concerns and Data Aggregation Risks

John Davison from the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) provides a critical perspective on the implications of Palantir’s data consolidation. Historically, the U.S. government maintained siloed data across multiple agencies as a safeguard for personal privacy. Davison warns that merging these datasets into a single repository could centralize power dangerously, making it susceptible to misuse against various groups, including immigrants and political opponents.

Notable Quote:
John Davison (03:30): “What happens when you break that down, when you start to pool all of that data together, you consolidate power in a single entity...”

The episode highlights alarming examples, such as the collaboration between the IRS and Homeland Security, where tax data is being used to identify and target undocumented immigrants. This breach of privacy, despite legal safeguards, underscores the potential for government overreach.

Notable Quote:
John Davison (04:31): “The Department of Homeland Security and ICE are conducting really harrowing, stunning enforcement raids...”

---

Historical Context: The Privacy Act of 1974

The hosts explore the historical backdrop of data privacy in the United States. In the 1960s, proposals for a national data center sparked significant backlash due to fears of privacy invasion. This concern was magnified by the Watergate scandal, where misuse of personal data by the Nixon administration led to the enactment of the Privacy Act of 1974. This legislation aimed to impose strict limitations on data collection and sharing among federal agencies.

Notable Quote:
Noel King (08:00): “Such a federal data center should have the authority to obtain computer tapes and other machine readable data produced by all federal agencies.”

The Privacy Act established a framework to prevent the excessive accumulation and sharing of personal information, a principle that Davison argues is currently being undermined by Palantir’s initiatives.

---

Current Applications and Misuses of Aggregated Data

The episode underscores the real-world consequences of data aggregation. John Davison recounts instances where individuals legally present in the U.S. were wrongfully targeted for deportation based on erroneous data integrations. A poignant testimony reveals how flawed data sharing can lead to wrongful detentions, highlighting the dangers inherent in Palantir’s systems.

Notable Quote:
Immigrant Testimony (06:29): “I told him I was an American citizen. And he looked at his other partner like, you know, smiling, like saying, can you believe this guy?”

Davison emphasizes that the centralization of data not only jeopardizes individual privacy but also poses a threat to democratic values by enabling the targeting of marginalized groups and political adversaries.

---

Palantir’s Internal Perspective vs. Public Perception

Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, portrays the company as a guardian of democratic values, aiming to create tools that enhance governmental efficiency and fairness. However, this self-image clashes with public skepticism and concerns about potential abuses of power. Journalistic investigations, supported by internal leaks, reveal a dissonance between Palantir’s stated mission and the practical applications of its technology.

Notable Quote:
Alex Karp (22:00): “We are here to uphold Western democratic values.”

On the other hand, critics argue that providing technical infrastructure to agencies like ICE inherently contradicts these democratic ideals, leading to ethical and logical conflicts.

Notable Quote:
Noel King (22:00): “I don't know how you square the idea that we are here to uphold Western democratic values while you are providing the technical infrastructure for a government agency that is actively undermining those same values.”

---

The Future of Palantir’s Power and Influence

The Trump administration’s proposal to centralize all government data under Palantir signifies a potential shift in the company’s role from a contractor to an indispensable pillar of governmental operations. This deepened integration could render Palantir an uncontested tech backbone, making it exceedingly difficult to dissolve contracts or mitigate its influence.

Notable Quote:
Alex Karp (25:02): “You can almost see a situation where Palantir becomes the technical infrastructure for the US Government and it becomes so deeply embedded into different agencies...”

The hosts and Davison express concern that even with the recognition of possible imperfections and mistakes, the unchecked growth of Palantir’s data consolidation efforts poses a significant threat to personal freedoms and privacy.

---

Conclusion: Balancing Innovation and Privacy

Today, Explained wraps up by reiterating the critical balance between leveraging data for governmental efficiency and safeguarding individual privacy. As Palantir continues to expand its reach, the episode calls for heightened awareness and proactive measures to ensure that technological advancements do not come at the expense of fundamental democratic values.

Final Notable Quote:
John Davison (27:05): “Palantir is a dangerous tool.”

---

Additional Resources and Contact Information

For more insights and to contribute tips, listeners are encouraged to reach out to Joseph Cox at 404 Media. The episode also acknowledges the support from various sponsors, emphasizing the collaborative effort behind the production of this in-depth analysis.

---

Stay Informed:
Subscribe to Today, Explained on your preferred podcast platform to stay updated on the most pressing issues reshaping our world.

Transcript

[Noel King]

The data analytics company Palantir has been working with the US government for about 15 years on all sorts of things. This year, ICE is going to pay Palantir $30 million to improve how it targets and surveils undocumented immigrants. And your response to this probably depends to some degree on your politics. But the Trump administration is also expanding Palantir's reach on something that would affect all Americans. The idea is to link together all the data that the government has about us. This unprecedented. So anyway, Theo von freaks out. This sounds crazy, dude. And confronts J.D. vance. It can tell if your kids are, you know, if your kid's going to have a limp or whatever, he'll be.

[J.D. Vance]

In the Christmas play.

[Noel King]

Veep is like, it's going to be okay. But FYI, I also just learned about this.

[John Davison]

I actually just read about it earlier today, or maybe yesterday.

[Noel King]

Coming up on Today explained what's paler up to.

[Advertisement Speaker]

Go from game time to having a good time with Corona Premier. It's the only lighter than light beer worthy of being called corona. 90 calories, 2.6 carbs and an undeniably crisp, refreshing taste you can't help but share because with Corona Premier, the best play happens off the field. Welcome to the premier side of light Corona Premier drink responsibly. Corona Premier beer imported by Crown Imports, Chicago, IL for 12 Fluid Ounce serving Average Analysis Cows 90 carbs 2.6 grams Protein 0.7 grams Fat 0.0 grams this.

[J.D. Vance]

Episode is brought to you by Amazon's Blink Video Doorbell. Get more at your door with the easy to install Blink Video Doorbell. Get more connections.

[Noel King]

Hey, I'm here for our first date.

[J.D. Vance]

More deliveries.

[Noel King]

Hi, I have tacos for two.

[J.D. Vance]

Oh thanks. We'll be right down. And more memories babe.

[Joseph Cox]

Come down. I have a surprise.

[J.D. Vance]

All new Blink video doorbell with two year battery, head to toe, HD view and simple setup. Shop now at Amazon.com blink for just $69.99.

[Noel King]

This is today Explained. I'm Noel King and heretofore the US Government has kept your personal data siloed across many different agencies in the interest of protecting your privacy. And good on them because the government actually does have a lot of your data. Here's John Davison of the Electronic Privacy Information center, or epic.

[John Davison]

It is a long list and it depends on the ways that you interact with the government. Some of the ones that are quite common would be income information, certainly your contact information, your sources of income, your charitable donations. All the types of things that many will be familiar with from having filed a tax Return before. So the data that's collected to process your taxes and that information is kept separate from the information that the State Department has about your passport and travel records, which is kept separate from Social Security data, which is kept separate from, you know, information about you, if you are an immigrant or if you've come under investigation at one time or another by a law enforcement agency.

[Noel King]

Talking about driver's licenses, banking, credit cards, birth and marriage certificates, pension information, home and work addresses, school records, immigration and naturalization records, family court records, the most sensitive personal data of millions of Americans.

[John Davison]

What happens when you break that down, when you start to pool all of that data together, you consolidate power in a single entity and a single actor, and that's whoever has access to that system. And so that can then be used to certainly, as we've seen, attack immigrants. It can be used to generate exaggerated claims of fraud, waste and abuse. It can be used to, in the future, target political opponents. I say in the future, that's already happening in some cases to target marginalized groups, ordinary Americans, you name it. Once you build the weapon, there is an enormous range of ways that it can be used to harm the people you dislike or disagree with.

[Noel King]

Give me some specifics. We've seen this happen. Where and how?

[John Davison]

I think one of the most alarming examples of this is the agreement that's been reached between the Internal Revenue Service and Homeland Security.

[Noel King]

The IRS is the latest government entity to cooperate with the Department of Homeland Security over the crackdown on undocumented immigrants. That's right. Immigration is now requesting additional information in home addresses of immigrants from the agency where the immigrants are actually filing and paying their taxes.

[John Davison]

So the Department of Homeland Security and ICE are conducting really harrowing, stunning enforcement raids and immigration enforcement activities. And in order to do that, they need a lot of information to identify who they believe are unlawfully present in the country. They went to the IRS and they said, can we have information about non citizens who are taxpayers still? And the irs, a lot of the civil servants, the career folks there, put up quite a fight because they understood that it was a really radical departure from the way the IRS has approached privacy and data protection historically, and very dubious as a legal matter because there are strict legal safeguards on that information. But in the end, after a lot of browbeating, the two agencies entered into a memo that permits a certain degree of sharing of information from the IRS to Homeland Security. And so there you see information that these taxpayers provided in good faith so that they could pay into the funding of the US Government. And then it's being taken and turned against them and used for the purposes of deportation and surveillance and immigration enforcement.

[Noel King]

I know there's some percentage of Americans who will say, all right, you've just given me example of people who are unlawfully in the United States, they're breaking the law. I'm not breaking the law, I follow the rules. Why should I be worried about this?

[John Davison]

First of all, many of the people that have been subject to immigration enforcement, it is developed that they are in fact legally present in the country.

[Immigrant Testimony]

He put the handcuffs on me and then he went to me and said, how did I get into this country? And if I was waiting for court or if I have any case. And I told him I was an American citizen. And he looked at his other partner like, you know, smiling, like saying, can you believe this guy?

[John Davison]

You think, okay, well this data is being combined and it's only being used against people who are breaking the law. What do I have to worry about? Well, why should you feel comfortable that it's going to end with the people that you might dislike or that you might think warrant adverse action by the government? There's just any number of ways that that information can be abused once it's all in one place.

[Noel King]

The government has always had a lot of data on us, but as you said, it has kept it separate across different agencies. Where did that start and why exactly?

[John Davison]

This country has a long history of being concerned about privacy. It's baked into the Constitution in the form of the Fourth Amendment. The right of the people to be secure in persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated. But it was in the 1960s, when computerized systems of records were becoming increasingly common. There was a proposal put forward to construct a national data center that would essentially pool all of that information in a one stop shopping kind of structure.

[Noel King]

Report of the Committee on the Preservation.

[Joseph Cox]

And Use of Economic Data, 1965.

[Noel King]

Such a federal data center should have the authority to obtain computer tapes and other machine readable data produced by all federal agencies.

[John Davison]

That proposal provoked a lot of backlash, a lot of concern.

[Joseph Cox]

New York Times headline, March 15, 1967 professor warns of Robot Snooper Tells Senators Data Bank Could Destroy Privacy. My own personal reaction to the proposal.

[John Davison]

For a national data center was, I.

[Joseph Cox]

Suppose, similar to that of most citizens.

[John Davison]

Intense apprehension at the prospect of still more invasions of personal privacy. I think folks have a sort of instinctive understanding of why they should be afraid of Big Brother. And that's what was motivating the response to the proposal. At the time, then Mr. Nixon says emphatically that the White House is in no way involved in the burglary and bugging of the Democratic headquarters, and he'll have no further comment on that matter. In Watergate, there were additional abuses proven that, you know, members of the Nixon administration had dipped into systems of personal information to carry out retribution and to target political opponents. And those two things together in 1974 added up to the Privacy Act. There will be hot pursuit of tough laws to prevent illegal invasion of privacy in both government and private activities. And that was Congress stepping in and saying, we have to limit the ability of agencies to collect information, to transmit the information. It's a system of restrictions that limit the ability to share that data within government. And now we're seeing exactly the type of consolidation and aggregation of data that Congress was afraid about when it passed the law in the first place.

[Noel King]

Let me ask you a question. Americans are people who think a lot and worry a lot about privacy, and many of us, and I would actually include myself in this, can't exactly put our finger on why. There's just a sense that if the government has a lot on me, then it might use it. Does a move like what President Trump is trying to do, does it change our relationship to the government in some way?

[John Davison]

We are talking about a government that is determined to eliminate safeguards that were put in place quite intentionally by Congress to prevent the sort of runaway accumulation of power that is made possible by the runaway accumulation of personal information. And I think it is something to be quite concerned about, because you build the surveillance weapon, you don't necessarily need to know every nefarious way that you're going to use it before you build it. The point is that you've built it, it's available to you. It is a source of tremendous power. And that's what we should be worried about, even if we can't predict every way today that it's going to be.

[Noel King]

John Davison of the Electronic Privacy Information Center. Epic has sued the Trump administration over privacy. The company that the administration has asked to organize all your data palantir her. Up next.

[Joseph Cox]

Support for the show comes from Koala. Sounds adorable. Let's see what it is. It's a sofa bed. Koala says they take comfort seriously. Unlike traditional sofa beds, Koala sofa beds don't use uncomfortable metal frames. They come in three sizes, so you can find the perfect fit fit for your space. A bit of a Goldilocks situation, it sounds like. And their color options are inspired by the Australian Outback because of course they are. It's called Koala, you guys. What can I tell you? They're easy to assemble. According to Koala, everything easily slides, clicks or screws together. Nary an Allen wrench in sight, says Koala. Upgrade your space with the most stylish, customizable and elevated sofa bed available. To get up to $250 off your new sofa, plus fast shipping, go to us.koala.comexplained. that's us.koala.comexpained. to get up to $250 off your new sofa. Koala Comfy, Easy, sustainable Support for this show comes from Built Rewards. You rack up points on groceries, travel and nearly everything else. And you can start earning points on your rent too, with Bilt Rewards. According to Bilt, no matter where you live or who your landlord is, Bilt helps your rent work for you. Bilt says there's no cost to join, and just by paying rent, you unlock flexible points that can be transferred to your favorite hotels and airlines, a future rent payment, and more. Bilt says that when you pay rent through them, you unlock two powerful benefits. First, you earn valuable points on rent every month. Second, you gain access to Bilt's neighborhood benefits, things like extra points on dining out points, post workout shakes, and unique experiences that only Built members can access. You can start paying rent through Bilt and take advantage of your neighborhood benefits by going to joinbuilt.com explained. That's J-O-I-N-B-I-L-T.com explained. Make sure to use our URL so they know we sent you. Joinbuilt.com Explain to sign up for Built.

[Alex Karp]

Today.

[Joseph Cox]

Support for the charity comes from Fireflies. I love Fireflies. I didn't know they had money to support our show. Let me see. Oh wait. Firefly says they're an AI teammate that transcribes, summarizes and analyzes your conversations so you can get the most out of every meeting. Definitely a different kind of Firefly. Firefly says they help you understand what was said, generate personalized notes, find information and take action on next steps and develop workflows to create internal efficiencies. According to Fireflies, you can capture notes, answer questions, or search the Internet all in real time. That's my favorite way to search the Internet. And Fireflies now provide summaries that are tailored to fit your role, whether that's in sales, marketing, engineering, recruiting, management, or even podcast production. Right now, when you sign up for a yearly Firefly subscription, you can get your first two months free. You can just go to Fireflies, AI explained. That's right, two months free when you go to Fireflies, AI explained. That's Fireflies, AI explained.

[John Davison]

A Palantir is a dangerous tool.

[Peter Thiel]

Salama.

[Noel King]

We do not know who else may.

[John Davison]

Be watching or listening to today.

[Alex Karp]

Explained.

[Noel King]

I'm Noel King. Joseph Cox is a co founder of 404 Media and the host of the 404 Media podcast. Palantir can be rather secretive and we called Joseph because he's got sources there and those sources are yapping to Joseph about what's going on on the inside.

[Alex Karp]

Palantir, at its root is a data analysis company, which sounds really boring, but it does have serious consequences. They specialize in being able to take all sorts of disparate pieces of data, stuff that ordinarily wouldn't be linked together. Maybe it's in strange formats, maybe it's messy and it brings it all into one interface or platform and makes it very easy to draw connections, search for different things or drill down onto certain pieces of information as well. You can imagine it's used in banks, for example, to maybe look for fraud. It could be used by health services to look for patterns there as well. They're sort of data agnostic in that way.

[Noel King]

What has Palantir been doing for the US Government to this point?

[Alex Karp]

Palantir has been working with the US government for a very, very long time. It goes all the way back to wars in the Middle east and the war on terror when the US had obviously this really large problem with IEDs and all of these soldiers were getting blown up and they had all of this data, such as where the explosions were happening, the fingerprints of maybe the bomb makers, the materials being used. But this data was very spread out and it wasn't really in one place and nobody could really make sense of it. So they started to use Palantir and apparently that was quite impactful for them being able to find out how to combat this problem.

[Advertisement Speaker]

Our team spent three days gathering a wide variety of open source data, then integrated them into Palantir to develop a clearer picture of the Afghan insurgency.

[John Davison]

Everybody's clamoring for it, all the special forces are using it, our allies are using it, our intelligence communities are all using Palantir.

[Alex Karp]

The military's begging for it after then. Obviously that's very much a defense and an intelligence agency in a military context. Palantir eventually moved into, you know, local and state law enforcement, essentially working with agencies around the country on that. And of course, most consequentially at the moment is Palantir's work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

[Noel King]

What has it been doing with ice?

[Alex Karp]

So Palantir has been working with ICE in some capacity for quite some time. ICE already has these data tools which allows it to bring together different sorts of information about people, Social Security number addresses, personal information, all of that sort of thing. And Palantir has been contracted for years to work on that tool. What has changed recently is that according to leaks I got from inside Palantir, ICE has become a much more mature partner for the company. And that means they're taking on a much more hands on role, developing this custom solution which they're calling Immigration os, which is basically supposed to supercharge what ICE is able to do with the information it has at the moment or what information it's going to have in the future as well. When I first revealed the $30 million extension to this contract, when you go into the procurement records and you read, well, why did palantir just get $30 million? The record says it was for complete target analysis of known populations, which was obviously very ominous. So I started looking into it. More got leaks from inside Palantir and it is basically to track the location of people who've been marked for deportation in, in real time. It is supposed to make ICE's work more efficient, effective, and in the eyes of Palantir, fair and accurate and transparent. They believe, well, if we take the data and we clean it and we present it in a really accessible way, this will actually make it easier and better for ICE to be able to execute its functions in a very fair manner. Now, obviously I think a lot of people might think that is naive when ICE is doing things which aren't necessarily based on the data itself, such as having masks, people with no identification, pulling people off the street. But that is how Palantir sees it internally.

[Noel King]

Okay, okay. Independent of its existing contract with ICE and with other parts of the American government, the Trump administration recently said it was going to partner with Palantir in an effort to make all of our data more accessible and efficient. People seem very unnerved by this announcement.

[Joseph Cox]

This is real. It's not a sci fi plot. I fuck with Trump, I really do. But I don't like the government overstepping.

[John Davison]

His reach to be all in our business. No one is talking about it, so spread the word.

[Noel King]

I'll do a full breakdown of my substack link to my bio, so subscribe.

[John Davison]

For free and follow along for more.

[Noel King]

And then immediately you saw pushback from Supporters from people who really like Palantir, saying, like, look, these are the good guys. The public perception of Palantir seems to be both divided and quite different from how the company views itself.

[Alex Karp]

Palantir isn't generating new data, and this is often something the company will stress. It is instead bridging gaps between existing data. But that is still exceptionally powerful and important when you take data in one context and then you weaponize or leverage it for another. What got me onto covering Palantir journalistically was the clear link between the company's work and immigration enforcement. And specifically, you have Immigration and Customs Enforcement driving around picking up people without identifying themselves, wearing masks. You have flights to El Salvador, violating court orders. It's not only the context of the data that has changed. It is the context of the democracy that has changed. And I think that is really key to understand for Palantir's perception. I've read Alex Karp, the CEO of Palantir, his book, and he very much frames Palantir as a force for good. We are here to uphold Western democratic.

[Peter Thiel]

Values, judge democracy by the fruits it bears, and we make the mistake at our peril in the west to forget if we do not deliver fruits to our people in the form of a better, fairer, healthier society, we will lose people. The thing about.

[Alex Karp]

I don't know how you square the idea that we are here to uphold Western democratic values while you are providing the technical infrastructure for a government agency that is actively undermining those same values. I can't logically do that in my head. I can't ethically find the argument. And I've sincerely tried to think about it after I've read the leaks I've got from inside Palantir, and I've even asked my Palantir sources, what do you think about this cognitive dissonance between upholding Western values and then facilitating the activity of this particular agency? And one of the sources said it was absolutely unhinged. Another said is the classic Palantir doublespeak. They talk about these ideals. I only care as far as the public perception sees it. I don't know if I necessarily agree with that. That is what my Palantir sources are saying. But there's absolutely a dissonance there which I can't really square that circle.

[Noel King]

I, against my better judgment, while on vacation, read a very long magazine piece about Alex Karp and found myself really, really curious. This is an interesting man. Tell us what we know about him.

[Alex Karp]

Yeah, I would say Alex Karp is pretty different to other tech CEOs. He went to Stanford, clearly reads a lot of sociology and philosophy. He met Peter Thiel, the infamous. Let me fit. He met Peter Thiel, the infamous investor and tech mogul. They co founded Palantir together. And I really think from the jump it was about protecting these Western values, be that the work of the military or other agencies as well.

[Peter Thiel]

So a country has to have a border. The educational institutions have to work. The military actually has to be scary. You actually can have things function in a way where the outside outputs are much greater than the inputs.

[Alex Karp]

When you read Karp's writings about how he sees the tech industry, he really doesn't like what Silicon Valley has become, which is basically a part of the industry that makes food delivery apps and social networks and Uber clones in a very derogatory sense is my impression when I'm reading his book. He thinks that the tech industry should be much more closely aligned with the state and specifically the American project.

[Peter Thiel]

I think the west as a notion and as a principle upon which it is executed is obviously superior. And not acknowledging that, because by not acknowledging it or denying it, you could pretend you were smarter or better than you were, has led to. To enormous problems in our society. And also for the sake of.

[Noel King]

So question is, how powerful does Palantir become if it becomes the company that under the Trump administration takes control of, merging all of our data across agencies, what does that do for it?

[Alex Karp]

You can almost see a situation where Palantir becomes the technical infrastructure for the US Government and it becomes so deeply embedded into different agencies, they would be nonsensical to sever these Palantir contracts. Karp uses the word dominance when talking about his projects. And I think an important thing to understand about Palantir is that they know tech is imperfect. They know their tech can be imperfect, they know the government policy can be imperfect. And they even admit that there will be mistakes made in immigration enforcement as well. But they don't think either of those are a reason to stop progress. They think you need to keep going, you need to keep building. This is pretty different to how government operates. You know, I would like to believe a government agency will be very, very careful and will really try to minimize damage as much as possible. Which is not to say that Palantir won't do that as well, but it acknowledges that mistakes will be made in this pursuit. But broadly it is to preserve America and the West.

[Noel King]

Joseph Cox, you can reach him at 404 Media Joseph at 404 Media Co for tips and tricks Peter Balan on Rosen produced today's show. Jolie Meyers edited Andrea. Christian Saunder and Patrick Boyd are our engineers. Laura Bullard knows far too much. I'm Noel King. It's Today explained.