Today, Explained – The Michael Jackson "Biopic"
Podcast: Today, Explained (Vox)
Date: April 30, 2026
Hosts: Sean Rameswaram, Noel King
Guests: Matt Belloni (Puck), Steve Knopper (author: "MJ: The Genius of Michael Jackson")
Overview
This episode dives into the controversial release of the new Michael Jackson biopic, "Michael," analyzing both what the film depicts and what it omits. The discussion centers on why the movie stops at the peak of Jackson’s career in the late 1980s—well before the infamous allegations and legal troubles that later defined his public image. The hosts, alongside entertainment journalist Matt Belloni and biographer Steve Knopper, unravel how legal battles, marketing strategies, and public sentiment shaped the film, raising questions about how we remember—and reckon with—the legacies of complicated artists.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
The Biopic’s Selective Narrative
- The movie “Michael” ends in the 1980s, skipping over the later years plagued by allegations of child sexual abuse (00:00–00:27).
- Early online backlash and satirical comparisons draw attention to the omission:
- Steve Knopper: "The team behind Michael should make a Hitler movie that ends with him triumphantly receiving the Iron Cross..." (00:09)
Behind-the-Scenes: How the Movie Changed
- 2019 Documentary Impact: HBO’s "Leaving Neverland" sharply tarnished Jackson’s rehabilitated image, prompting the estate to pursue a movie as a counter-narrative (02:08–03:52).
- Matt Belloni: "From the estate's perspective, 100% that's what they wanted out of this project." (04:02)
- Original Script: The first iteration directly engaged with the allegations, portraying Michael as a victim and dramatizing police investigations and legal battles (04:41–06:23).
- "Michael is 100% presented as the victim of these allegations. There's a strip search scene...he's crying. It's really tough to read." (05:10)
- Legal Complications: A 90s-era settlement with the Chandler family meant neither side could dramatize events of their relationship, forcing a total rewrite (08:07–09:43).
- Final Movie: The resulting cut ends with Michael’s 1988 "Bad Tour," centering mainly on his rise, his music, and his strained relationship with his father—leaving the darkest chapters unaddressed.
Sequel Hints and Future Tensions
- The film closes with the words “his story continues,” setting up a likely sequel (10:04).
- Matt Belloni: “The demand seems to be there...Now it's gonna be a huge challenge.” (10:34–10:57)
- Producers face a dilemma: Will audiences want a sequel that finally addresses the controversies, or will they reject it after embracing a sanitized narrative?
- "Do the fans actually want that? Is that going to be successful? I don't know the answer to that." (11:36)
Criticism and Filmmaker Response
- Critics accuse the biopic of "having nothing to say" by avoiding the allegations (11:49–12:07).
- Director Antoine Fuqua’s Defense: Points to other sanitized biopics (like "Elvis") as evidence of double standards and says the marketing deliberately focused on Michael’s music (12:07–13:05).
Michael Jackson’s Career & Cultural Impact
- Superstardom Details: The scale of Michael Jackson’s celebrity in the 80s (17:43–18:49).
- Steve Knopper: “It’s really difficult to imagine...just how gigantic Michael was. He was overwhelming.” (17:50)
- Michael’s unusual childhood and longing for innocence are cited as explanations for his affinity for children (19:24–20:24).
- Michael Jackson (clip): "They’d be rooting and making noise and I would cry...It made me sad that I would have to go and work instead." (19:51–19:57)
The Abuse Allegations, Settlements, and Public Reactions
- Chronology of Accusations: Early 90s settlement, 2005 acquittal after a media circus, and "Leaving Neverland" (20:34–26:01).
- All accusations remain unresolved in court; no definitive proof, though public opinion remains split.
- Steve Knopper: "All of these charges against him are in the category of accusation...he was found not guilty in a court in 2005." (26:18)
Art vs. Artist: The Enduring Dilemma
- The discussion extends to broader questions about how we treat art made by controversial figures (28:20–29:36).
- Steve Knopper: "There are many, many examples of artists who have done terrible, horrific things, and yet we still like their work. James Brown…Afrika Bambaata…If you’re writing the biography...you kind of have to acknowledge the good and the bad." (28:20–29:36)
- Asked if he’d use the same title for his Michael Jackson biography today, Knopper hesitates:
- Sean Rameswaram: “Would you keep the same title if it were published today?” (29:36)
- Steve Knopper: "Probably not." (29:43)
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- Satirical reviewer on social media:
"The team behind Michael should make a Hitler movie that ends with him triumphantly receiving the Iron Cross..." (Steve Knopper – 00:09)
- Matt Belloni on original/removed script:
"Michael is 100% presented as the victim of these allegations...a strip search scene...he's crying. It's really tough to read." (05:10)
- On legal constraints:
"A settlement...precluded either the estate or the family from dramatizing the events...it comes back to haunt the Jackson estate when they are trying to make a movie of their version..." (Matt Belloni – 08:07)
- On sanitized legacy:
“Do the fans actually want [a controversial sequel]? Is that going to be successful? I don’t know the answer to that.” (Matt Belloni – 11:36)
- On Michael's celebrity:
“It’s really difficult to sort of imagine...just how gigantic Michael was. He was overwhelming.” (Steve Knopper – 17:50)
- On proof of abuse:
"No. All of these charges against him are in the category of accusation...he was found not guilty in a court in 2005." (Steve Knopper – 26:18)
Timestamps for Key Segments
- 00:00 – 02:08: Introduction and public reaction to the biopic’s omissions
- 02:08 – 03:52: Post-Leaving Neverland dynamics and the estate’s motives
- 04:02 – 06:23: The original movie plan, direct engagement with allegations, and legal roadblocks
- 07:49 – 09:43: How legal settlements forced the film to be split in two
- 10:04 – 11:36: Enter the possibility of a sequel and new creative hurdles
- 11:49 – 13:05: Director’s response to criticism and strategy comparison to other music biopics
- 17:43 – 20:24: Michael’s career and unique upbringing
- 20:34 – 29:36: Timeline of allegations, trials, settlements, and ongoing art vs. artist debate
Tone & Perspective
- The tone balances dark humor (early social media reactions), serious journalistic inquiry, and cultural critique regarding Michael Jackson’s complicated legacy.
- Both guests bring an inside-Hollywood perspective and frankness about the practical, legal, and ethical dilemmas of adapting controversial lives for the screen.
Conclusion
This episode of Today, Explained unpacks not just the content of the Michael Jackson biopic, but the legal, cultural, and emotional landmines inherent in representing a superstar whose life and allegations continue to divide and fascinate the world. The conversation leaves listeners with broader questions about where to draw the line between honoring artistic genius and acknowledging personal darkness—and how much the public really wants to confront both.