Trump's chief culture warrior

Summary

---

Today, Explained — “Trump's chief culture warrior”

Host: Noel King (Vox)
Guest: Christopher Rufo (activist, writer, Senior Fellow at Manhattan Institute, author of America’s Cultural Revolution)
Date: September 10, 2025

---

Episode Overview

This episode delves into the impact and philosophy of Christopher Rufo, a prominent conservative activist who has been a driving force behind recent rightward shifts in American cultural institutions — particularly universities, museums, and corporations. Host Noel King presses Rufo on the goals, motivations, and consequences of the “countercultural revolution” he champions, examining everything from his role in the battle over DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) and critical race theory to his involvement in influencing corporate policy and American art institutions.

---

Key Discussion Points

1. Rufo’s Influence and Achievements

• Opening Theme: Noel King credits Rufo with achieving much of what he publicly called for: from ending DEI at the federal level to influencing university funding, excising critical race theory from public schools, and even shifting corporate branding (Cracker Barrel).
  • [00:19] Rufo: “We've ended the tyranny of so called diversity, equity and inclusion policies all across the entire federal government.”
• Main Question: What does Rufo want now, and what is his vision for America’s culture?

---

2. The Spread of Academic Theories Beyond Colleges

• Rufo’s Thesis: Contrary to the conservative wisdom that college “woke” ideas would fade in the real world, Rufo argues that graduates brought these theories into all American institutions, especially public education.
  • [03:10] Rufo: “In fact, those college graduates took these bad ideas from the universities and then implanted them everywhere… those are now baked into the state curriculum… in states where you might not expect it.”
• Defines Critical Race Theory (CRT) in functional terms — “systemic racism,” “white fragility,” “equity instead of equality”—and contends that these tenets have permeated curriculum and bureaucracy.
  • [04:23] Rufo: “There are certain standards… The idea of systemic racism, the idea that the United States is a system of white supremacy... of equity instead of equality… different groups treated differently under law.”

---

3. Art, State Institutions, and the Power to Curate

• Discussion: Trump’s administration demanded changes at the Smithsonian, objecting to exhibits seen as ideologically driven, such as a Gonzalez painting depicting a border crossing.
  • [05:34] King: “Why… should Americans not look at that painting?”
  • Rufo asserts that while artists have First Amendment rights, public institutions (funded by taxpayers) are subject to presidential authority and should reflect the “public interest.” He suggests that many institutions have been “captured” by left-wing ideologues.
  • [07:01] Rufo: “Great art is not highly polemical. Highly polemical art is almost never great art. You need a kind of subtlety…”
• Debates over who decides artistic merit or inclusion at state-funded museums, with King challenging Rufo’s authority to judge art and Rufo arguing for a “tradition” of enduring artistic standards.
  • [10:08] Rufo: “They might [disagree], but they would be actually wrong… There are enduring artistic standards and traditions.”

---

4. Institutional Change: “Counter-Revolution” and Its Permanence

• Questioned whether recent moves signify victory in Rufo’s “revolution,” Rufo calls current gains just the beginning:
  • [11:39] Rufo: “We have certainly won an enormous victory, but the battle is not won. This is really the first part of the counter revolution, and it's a generational project…”

---

5. Cracker Barrel and Corporate Targeting

• King explores Rufo’s campaign against Cracker Barrel’s logo changes and support for DEI and LGBTQ+ causes.
• Rufo describes it as both “ironic” and strategic: targeting companies with conservative customer bases but progressive management sends a signaling effect to other corporations.
  • [15:19] Rufo: “Cracker Barrel is a means to an end... The idea is that Cracker Barrel is a controversy that, if it can be won … will send a signal to other corporate executives that if you embrace left wing ideological causes, you're opening up significant risk…”
• King notes Cracker Barrel's own fraught civil rights history, questioning why a private corporation cannot pivot to inclusion efforts:
  • [18:21] Rufo: “…It's my First Amendment right to highlight the fact that they're doing so and to issue a public criticism. And then of course, it's investors' rights... to sell shares.”

---

6. Transgender Rights and Ideology

• Rufo is pressed on his public statements about “transgenderism” being an ideology rather than a personal attribute.
  • [20:09] Rufo: “Transgenderism is quite simple. It's an ideology that holds that men can become women and women can become men… through puberty blockers, hormone drugs, and in many cases, genital surgeries.”
• King challenges Rufo for using similar “dehumanizing” rhetoric (about trans people) as left academic critics use about “whiteness.”
• Rufo adamantly rejects any comparison, asserting that transgender identity is not analogous to racial identity and is purely ideological.
  • [22:03] Rufo: “Criticizing the ideology of transgenderism. It's obviously an ideology. Right. Nobody is born transgender.”
• King asks directly if he believes transgender people “exist and have the right to exist.”
  • [23:04] Rufo: “Sure. I believe that people who believe that they have… gender identity distinct from their biological sex exist, of course… [but] men cannot become women and women cannot become men.”

---

7. “Extreme” Positions and the Vision for America

• King notes similarities between Rufo’s methods/absolutism and radicals he criticizes in his book.
• Rufo denies having any “extreme” positions, calling them moderate and well-supported by mainstream America.
  • [24:13] Rufo: “I actually think all of my positions are moderate, well reasoned, in accordance with basic decency…”
• Asked for his positive vision, Rufo calls for a return to “colorblind equality,” ensuring institutions reflect the “values of the public,” and faithfulness to the Constitution and the spirit of liberty and equality.
  • [25:07] Rufo: “We need to move to a standard of colorblind equality so that the government treats all individuals equally, regardless of ancestry… stick with our Constitution, and… the spirit of liberty and equality…”

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• [05:55] Rufo: “[The Smithsonian] is funded [by] federal taxpayers. And… the president has wide latitude as an executive to set the standards and… rules of the road for government institutions in the best interest of the people.”
• [07:01] Rufo: “Great art is not highly polemical… Highly polemical art is almost never great art.”
• [09:59] King: “According to you… another person… might feel very differently.” [10:08] Rufo: “They might, but they would be actually wrong.”
• [11:39] Rufo: “We have certainly won an enormous victory, but the battle is not won… it’s a generational project.”
• [15:19] Rufo: “Cracker Barrel is a means to an end… it was obvious… we could in fact break the barrel with just a small amount of effort.”
• [20:09] Rufo: “Transgenderism is quite simple. It’s an ideology that holds that men can become women and women can become men…”
• [23:04] Rufo: “Sure. I believe that people… believe that their gender identity is distinct from their biological sex exist, of course… [but] men cannot become women and women cannot become men.”
• [25:07] Rufo: “We need to move to a standard of colorblind equality so that the government treats all individuals equally, regardless of ancestry…”

---

Segment Timestamps

• [00:00–02:05] Introduction & Brief history of Rufo’s influence
• [02:09–05:03] Rufo lays out his biography and thesis of America’s Cultural Revolution
• [05:04–11:30] Museums, public funding, and the “culture war” over art
• [11:30–12:15] Is the “counter-revolution” achieved?
• [14:56–19:48] Corporate campaigns (Cracker Barrel) and the broader strategy
• [19:48–23:35] Rufo’s views on transgender people and ideology, debate over rhetoric and analogy
• [23:35–26:10] Vision for America: “colorblind equality," mainstreaming the revolution

---

Summary & Takeaway

Rufo is unapologetic about his agenda: to root out what he views as leftist, identity-based ideologies from major American institutions and replace them with his vision of colorblind equality and classical liberalism. He maintains that conservative victories are only just beginning and that lasting change requires generational effort. King’s line of questioning highlights the contentious tone and absolutism in Rufo’s arguments, challenging both his definitions and proposed cultural boundaries. The episode exposes the profound rifts over who gets to define American values — in government, art, business, and public life — and underscores how the culture wars are actively being waged at every institutional level.

---

Transcript

[Noel King]

Noel I'm Noel King and today on Today Explained from Vox, I'm talking to conservative activist, writer and provocateur Christopher Rufo. Why? Because Chris Rufo gets what he wants. From universities, from corporations, from President Trump. He wanted an end to dei. He got it.

[Christopher Rufo]

We've ended the tyranny of so called diversity, equity and inclusion policies all across the entire federal government.

[Noel King]

He wanted the government to yank federal funding from universities unless they submitted to his demands. He got that too. He wanted an obscure academic legal theory to become a national boogeyman. Done.

[Christopher Rufo]

We have removed the poison of critical race theory from our public schools.

[Noel King]

He wanted Cracker Barrel to change its logo back.

[Christopher Rufo]

We could in fact break the barrel with just a small amount of effort.

[Noel King]

Since he's getting what he wants, we thought it was worth asking, what does he want now? Coming up, Chris Ruffo's Cultural Revolution Adobe.

[Adobe Acrobat Studio Advertiser]

Acrobat Studio so brand new. Show me all the things PDFs can do. Do your work with ease and speed. PDF Spaces is all you need. Do hours of research in an instant with key insights from an AI assistant. Pick a template with a click now your prezo looks super slick. Close that deal. Yeah, you won. Do that. Doing that, did that, done. Now you can do that. Do that with Acrobat. Now you can do that. Do that with the all new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

[Apple Card Advertiser]

This message is brought to you by Apple Card. Each Apple product, like the iPhone, is thoughtfully designed by skilled designers. The Titanium Apple Card is no different. It's laser etched, has no numbers, and it earns you daily cash on everything you buy, including 3% back on everything at Apple. Apply for Apple Card on your iPhone in minutes, subject to credit approval. Apple Card is issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA Salt Lake City Branch terms and [e-mail].

[Today Explained Host/Producer]

This is today Explained.

[Christopher Rufo]

Sure, yeah, I'll give you the full bio. Christopher Ruffo, Writer, journalist, activist, Senior fellow at Manhattan Institute, Author of America's Cultural.

[Noel King]

Revolution I found America's Cultural Revolution, which was published in 2023, to be the clearest summation of your ideas. And I really liked the book. I saw some of what you described firsthand. I went from a rural public high school where America is mostly a good country, was kind of the ethos to a quote unquote elite college. And I was really unmoored by the classroom focus on Marxism and critical whiteness studies and structural privilege. Some of it was very interesting, but some of it was like, what are you guys on? And in fact, I was very excited to graduate and get out into the real world and leave all of that behind. Right. But as I was reading your book, I see that your thesis is those theories followed me from college out into the real world. I didn't actually leave them behind. Give me the argument that you're making in the book.

[Christopher Rufo]

For a long time, the conservative critique of the universities was that college students were wasting their time on critical race Marxism and intersectional gender theory. And when they would graduate from college, they would go out into the world and find that they had been ill equipped and they would have to quickly adapt to the quote, unquote, real world. And in retrospect, that turned out to be a catastrophically wrong headed theory because the opposite occurred. In fact, those college graduates took these bad ideas from the universities and then implanted them everywhere. So your rural high school, I'm not sure what state New York, rural New York is probably actually most certainly teaching. Those same theories that you had encountered in an elite private college a number of years ago, those are now baked into the state curriculum, not only of states like New York and California and Oregon and Washington, where I am, but in states where you might not expect it.

[Noel King]

When you say critical race theory, what do you mean? And I should note the definition is contested, but what are you talking about?

[Christopher Rufo]

I don't think the definition is contested. I actually, I actually would say critical.

[Noel King]

Race theorists would probably disagree. But go ahead, tell us what you mean.

[Christopher Rufo]

They wouldn't, though. I actually would take their definition at face value. The arguments are quite simple. And some of the key kind of stock phrases that we've heard over the last couple of years really emerge from critical race theory. The idea of systemic racism, the idea that the United States is a system of white supremacy, the idea that people of European descent suffer from conditions such as white fragility, white privilege, white psychopathology, and the idea of equity instead of equality, meaning different groups of people should be treated differently under law in order to achieve the equality of outcomes.

[Noel King]

Let's talk about the kind of counter revolution that you're laying out in American institutions. The Trump administration is demanding that the Smithsonian museums make changes to their exhibits, citing, quote, improper ideology. So the administration released a list of things it found objectionable. Or one of them was a portrait of a father, a mother and two children crossing the border into South Texas. The artist is Rigoberto Gonzalez. Why, Chris, should Americans not look at that painting?

[Christopher Rufo]

Well, I mean, Americans can look at it Certainly this artist, why can't they.

[Noel King]

Look at it in the Smithsonian Museum, which is our American repository of culture?

[Christopher Rufo]

I think the framing of the question misses an essential point. I don't know, is the artist, you tell me, is the artist American or foreign national?

[Noel King]

I don't know. Why does that matter? Tell me.

[Christopher Rufo]

Well, I was gonna say, if the artist is an American born citizen, then of course that individual has a First amendment right to paint whatever picture he would like to exhibit it as he see fits. But it doesn't mean that he has a right to a public subsidy and to hang whatever picture he would like in the Smithsonian. And so the Smithsonian is a government related institution. It's funded federal taxpayers. And again, under Article 2 of the Constitution, the president has wide latitude as an executive to set the standards and to set really the rules of the road for government institutions in the best interest of the people. And what happens with a lot of these institutions that they are totally captured by left wing ideologues. In that painting, for example, it's, you know, a very politically charged painting. It's not simply an ethnicity statement.

[Noel King]

It's art, Chris. I mean, sure, you can't be shocked that there's some political charge to a lot of art, right?

[Christopher Rufo]

What do we think that actually. No, I think that that's actually a terrible aesthetic misjudgment on your behalf. Because actually great art is not highly polemical. And in fact, a highly polemical art is almost never great art. And so you need to have a kind of subtlety of expression, an expression that can't be immediately pigeonholed as a polemical or narrowly ideological statement in order to achieve a kind of aesthetic superiority that merits inclusion in one of our marquee artistic and cultural institutions. And so I think that this particular painting, if you were to ask me, I would say that it does not meet the basic aesthetic and artistic and cultural threshold to be included. And so I think that you're not.

[Noel King]

An expert in art. Chris, You're a guy who is an activist and you have a degree from Georgetown.

[Christopher Rufo]

I'm an American taxpayer. I've studied art. I've studied art all over the world. I'm an appreciator of the arts. And so certainly this is my opinion.

[Noel King]

Yes, right. So let's talk about how your opinion fits in with somebody who has, let's say your opinion versus an American citizen who with a background in art who feels exactly the opposite that you do.

[Christopher Rufo]

That's why we have an incredible Christian system that's why? We have an incredible system in our country called voting for President of the United States. And so when you vote for a conservative president of the United States, he has the full authority of the American people to turn the federal institutions in a more conservative direction. And in fact, the problem is precisely the opposite, as you're suggesting. The problem is that for multiple decades now, these institutions would run a monolithically left wing ideological line, whether a Democrat was in office or a Republican was in office. These are public institutions that have not been responsive to the public for many decades. And so Trump's correct is totally justified under the Constitution and is long overdue as a matter of democratic principle.

[Noel King]

You've talked a lot about how you want this country to go back to a kind of classical Western education that promotes critical thinking in the face of difficult ideas. Why would you support the erasure of art that challenges people to think about America?

[Christopher Rufo]

Well, I think that's a very convenient euphemism. This is not art that challenges people, actually, it's art that doesn't challenge people. Painting, which I can remember from some of the reporting, is so one dimensional, is so shallow, is so narrowly polemical that it actually doesn't challenge any of the aesthetic or cultural faculties that we should be developing.

[Noel King]

According to you, I just gotta step in and say, like, according to you, I mean, another person who lives on. No, I don't think just according to our. Might feel very differently.

[Christopher Rufo]

They might, but they would be actually wrong. Oh, wow. And it's not just according to me. Right. We actually have, you know, there are certain standards of aesthetics, of artistic production, of creativity that we've been, of course, debating over centuries, over millennia. Art is not just a matter of personal preference. It's not just a matter of, you know, he said, she said. But in fact, there are enduring artistic standards and traditions by which contemporary works can and should be measured. And that is precisely the role of the curators of culture.

[Noel King]

Yeah, the curators who put painting in the Smithsonian. Right.

[Christopher Rufo]

People made these things, but those are curators of an anticulture. And so what's the anti culture? Artistic and cultural institutions have really brought into being an artistic anticulture, meaning a kind of nihilistic cultural expression that reduces art to politics, that reduces culture to negation, and that celebrates ugliness instead of beauty. And I think that this painting, which has drawn so much attention is rightly in that tradition of anticulture.

[Noel King]

Are President Trump's recent moves in the Smithsonian, for example, in education, for example, are they evidence that you have won your revolution.

[Christopher Rufo]

I think that we have certainly won an enormous victory, but the battle is not won. This is really the first part of the counter revolution, and it's a generational project that will take many, many years to conclude. And so while we should certainly celebrate victory as it comes, we should have enough humility to remember that there are no permanent victories, and victories can be undone in the blink of an eye.

[Noel King]

Writer and activist Chris Ruffo Coming up, we're going to the Cracker Barre.

[Today Explained Host/Producer]

Support for the program today comes from Shopify. When you're creating your own business, you have to juggle a lot of roles. Marketing, sales, outreach, design. Shopify can simplify all of that. Shopify is the commerce platform behind millions of businesses around the world and according to the company, 10% of all e commerce in the US from household names like Mattel and Gymshark to brands just getting started like maybe I don't know yours. They say they have hundreds of ready to use templates to help design your brand style. And they say they can make marketing easier by creating email and social media campaigns so you can connect with customers wherever they be scrolling. Shopify also has AI tools created for commerce they say can help you create product descriptions, generate discount codes and more. You can turn your big business idea into reality with Shopify on your side. You can sign up for your $1 per month trial and start selling today at shopify.com/explained. You can go to shopify.comexplained that shopify.com/explained. Does anyone have a cash register handy?

[Adobe Acrobat Studio Advertiser]

Adobe Acrobat Studio so brand new. Show me all the things PDFs can do. Do your work with ease and speed. PDF Spaces is all you need. Do hours of research in an instant with Key Insight, an AI assistant. Pick a template with a click. Now your preo looks super slick. Close that deal. Yeah, you won. Do that, doing that, did that, done. Now you can do that. Do that with Acrobat. Now you can do that do that with the all new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all new Adobe Acrobat Studio.

[Robinhood Advertiser]

Support for this show comes from Robinhood. Wouldn't it be great to manage your portfolio on one platform? With Robinhood, not only can you trade individual stocks and ETFs, you can also seamlessly buy and sell crypto at low costs. Trade all in one place. Get started now on Robinhood Trading. Crypto involves significant risk Crypto trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Crypto llc. Robinhood Crypto is licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. Crypto held through Robinhood Crypto is not FDIC insured or civic protected. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Securities trading is offered through an account with Robinhood Financial LLC MemberCIPIC, a registered broker dealer.

[Today Explained Host/Producer]

This is Today Explained.

[Noel King]

We're back with Chris Ruffo. He's an activist and author of the book America's Cultural Revolution. Let's talk about one of your more recent countercultural revolution wins, and that is Cracker Barrel. So after the the company changed its logo to remove Uncle Herschel, the elderly fella on the logo you wrote on Twitter, we must break the barrel. Why?

[Christopher Rufo]

Well. Oh, that was a fun one. So Cracker Barrel was a lot of fun. That was a very interesting campaign. And look, on the surface it's something that is admittedly a little ridiculous. And even my language about breaking the barrel should be taken with a tone of irony and humor because it's quite funny. You know, why are we running a political campaign against a southern themed chain restaurant? You know, that seems like out of left field, but under the surface there was something more serious happening that's important to understand. Cracker Barrel, of course, has a predominantly conservative customer base, right? That is the brand, that is the marketing, that is the customer experience. And yet at corporate headquarters, as my friend, the muckraking journalist Robby Starbuck uncovered at corporate headquarters, Cracker Barrel executives had gone full woke. They had embraced dei, embraced pride programming, embraced gender neo pronouns, embraced drag queens for kids, and really were indistinguishable from any of the other left wing corporate executives that we've seen in recent years. That is again, a huge distinction from their customer base. And so if our goal is to roll back woke ideologies in America's institutions, you want to start with institutions where you have the most leverage. And it was obvious because of this discrepancy between the executives and the customers at Cracker Barrel that we could in fact break the barrel with just a small amount of effort. And then the final point is that Cracker Barrel is a means to an end. Again, I've actually never been to Cracker Barrel. I'm not sure I would want to patronize Cracker Barrel. That's not my kind of food. But the idea is that Cracker Barrel is a controversy that if it can be won, and it was won, will send a signal to other corporate executives that if you embrace left wing ideological causes, you're opening up significant risk to your company, to your brand favorability and to your bottom line.

[Noel King]

Let's talk about Cracker Barrel's history. Okay. And its rights, if it has any, as a private company. So Cracker Barrel came under scrutiny in the early 1990s after it fired gay employees. Then in the early 2000s, I think it was 2004, it settled a lawsuit in which the allegations were white employees were allowed to refuse to serve black customers, diners were segregated based on race, and black diners were served food from the trash 20, 21 years ago. So Cracker Barrel pivots and it says, we're going to support pride. We're going to have a DEI program. Why can't a private company make that decision for itself? This is not a college, Chris. Your tax dollars are not going there.

[Christopher Rufo]

I think you're making two huge leaps and likely errors of fact. So certainly if that's true, I read the lawsuit, I didn't read the settlement. But certainly if they were, for example, refusing to serve black customers, that's a violation of the Civil Rights Act. I'm glad to hear that Cracker Barrel paid a penalty for that and rectified its behavior. I think we can all agree that that is a violation of non discrimination provisions. But you're assuming that somehow funding Drag Queens for kids rectifies racial discrimination at its stores in the 1990s. That seems like an enormous leap. And that is not really justifiable or not explanatory of the behavior. And then your second thing is like, well, don't they have the right to support they them pronouns for their employees? I mean, sure, they're allowed to do that. It's a private company. They can use they them pronouns. They can use it itself pronouns. They can use frog, frog, self pronouns for that matter. That's totally fine. But then of course, it's my first amendment right to highlight the fact that they're doing so and to issue a public criticism. And then of course, it's investors rights of their own property to sell shares of the company.

[Noel King]

Let's talk about your views on transgender people. In late August, you tweeted, quote, we should now put to rest the libertarian delusion that transgenderism is a matter of personal choice or live and let live. It's an ideology that has done grave damage to millions of Americans and has unleashed a nihilistic wave of violence on our society. Enough. How do you define transgenderism?

[Christopher Rufo]

Transgenderism is quite simple. It's an ideology that holds that men can become women and women can become men through the adoption of different gender pronouns, different personal dress and costume puberty blockers, hormone drugs, and in many cases, genital surgeries. And this ideology is not just a kind of personal ideology, but it has the aspirations of annexing its position in the public square and so claiming that so called transgender people have an entitlement to publicly subsidized medical interventions, claiming that refusing to recognize the gender identity of so called transgender people is a violation of civil rights law, and then lobbying for the kind of forcible ideological reproduction of the ideology within the institutions of public education, public health, public administration. And so that's how I would define the ideology.

[Noel King]

When you talk about trans people, you employ similar language to the critical whiteness. People who say whiteness is an ideology. Whiteness should be abolished. Whiteness is evil. Now, you understandably dislike this language. White people are individuals, and to reduce them to their skin color is, you know, it's nuts. Academics would say we're misunderstanding their point, but let's not care for a second what academics think. Are you aware that you're talking the same way about trans people as these people that you seem to really detest?

[Christopher Rufo]

I don't think I am at all. I think that's not an accurate or fair comparison.

[Noel King]

I don't think transgenderism is an ideology. Whiteness is an ideology.

[Christopher Rufo]

Yeah. Criticizing the ideology of transgenderism. It's obviously an ideology. Right. Nobody is born transgender. That is.

[Noel King]

Well, you know, this is. Again, this is an opinion and a belief.

[Christopher Rufo]

It's not an opinion. It's not a belief. No, no. Even transgender activists don't believe that people are born transgender. I mean, it doesn't make any sense. Right. And so I think that it's a total misnomer, I mean, total misnomer to say that, you know, that it's comparable, like transgender identity is comparable to. To racial identity. I think that's just a false.

[Noel King]

Well, it leaves. The idea is it's leaving people out of the equation. It's leaving people out of the equation.

[Christopher Rufo]

Transgender people think about whiteness. It's not true at all. Yeah, that's not true.

[Noel King]

Do you believe that transgender people exist and have the right to exist?

[Christopher Rufo]

Look, I mean, again, these are like ideological questions that are like Zen koans of nihilism. That's not a real question.

[Noel King]

Yes, Chris, it is a real question. It is a real question.

[Christopher Rufo]

That's a question masked in a euphemism. So I'll answer it very. I'll answer it very clearly. Do you believe that transgender people exist? Sure. I believe that people who believe that they have. That their Gender identity is distinct from their biological sex exist, of course, obviously, ultimately it doesn't mean that what they're saying is true because it's quite obvious. Men cannot become women and women cannot become men.

[Noel King]

You wrote a book about smart people who came to believe that America was an evil place that was bad beyond redemption and that it could really only be reformed if people moved to extremes. Some of their extremes were arguably absurd and un American. Some of your extremes are arguably absurd and un American.

[Christopher Rufo]

Name one. Name one. I don't have any extreme opinions. Not one.

[Noel King]

None of the radicals that you profiled, Chris, were ever particularly embarrassed or sorry. This is a point in your book you kind of return to again and again. Do you think you ever will be?

[Christopher Rufo]

Well, no. Again, I think the factual premise of many of your questions is something hard to believe. What single position do I have is extreme? I actually think all of my positions are moderate, well reasoned, in accordance with basic decency and almost unremarkable. I find myself in this very odd position where I'm treated like a radical when in fact my positions are so moderate, so mainstream, so broadly supported across geography and time. I really am hoping you can tell me which one of my positions is so extreme.

[Noel King]

I'm gonna let our listeners make that call for themselves. Let me do one last question, if I could. Critics sometimes stall when they're asked to provide a vision of a good society. You're a critic of what's been going on in America. We're. What is yours? What does a good America look like to you?

[Christopher Rufo]

What I think we need to do relevant to our conversation is quite simple. We need to move to a standard of colorblind equality so that the government treats all individuals equally, regardless of ancestry. And we need to have a very clear eyed vision about what we do with our public institutions and to ensure that the public institutions always reflect the values of the public. And so I think if we stick with the American people, we stick with our Constitution, and we stick with the spirit of liberty and equality that was entrenched by our founders who pointed us to resolve the many challenges and shortcomings of history, we will continue to have the greatest country in the world. I know that the vast majority of the American people are with me and I think we can all unite behind this agenda.

[Noel King]

Chris Ruffo is the author of America's Cultural Revolution. We'll put a link to the book in our show notes. Chris, thank you for coming on.

[Christopher Rufo]

Thank you.

[Noel King]

Today's team. Myles Bryan, Jolie Myers, Patrick Boyd, Adrienne Lilly and Laura Bullard. It's today, explained.

[Robinhood Advertiser]

Sam.