Why Democrats caved

Summary

Podcast Summary: Today, Explained – “Why Democrats Caved”

Date: November 10, 2025
Host: Estad Herndon (Vox)
Guests: Andrew Prokop (Vox Senior Political Correspondent), David Axelrod (Political Analyst & Commentator)

---

Overview: Main Theme & Episode Purpose

This episode of Today, Explained analyzes the sudden resolution to the longest government shutdown in United States history. With a narrow, bipartisan deal emerging in the Senate—brokered after Democrats, including some key defectors, agreed to Republican terms—the show delves into why Democratic lawmakers caved, what forced their hand, and what political consequences may follow, particularly for party leadership and their stance against President Trump.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Shutdown Deal: What Happened?

• Bipartisan Deal Reached: After nearly six weeks, eight senators (seven Democrats, one Independent) joined Republicans to advance a bill reopening the government.
• Deal Details:
  • Primarily restores the status quo—funding for government operations until January’s next deadline ([02:35] Andrew Prokop).
  • Protects food aid programs, unpaid federal workers, and halts layoffs triggered by the shutdown ([02:49] David Axelrod).
  • On Democrats’ main demand (extending expiring ACA subsidies): only a promise for a future Senate vote— considered an empty gesture ([03:20] Andrew Prokop, [03:39] David Axelrod).
  • “[It’s] kind of just a status quo restart the government’s funding and continue it on until the next expiration...” ([02:35] Andrew Prokop)

2. Did Democrats “Cave”? Why?

• Failed Leverage: Democrats sought concessions from Trump, banking on voter discontent with the shutdown, but gained virtually nothing meaningful in return ([03:51] Andrew Prokop).
• Vote No, Hope Yes: Many Democrats publicly opposed the deal but privately felt the shutdown had run its course—eight were willing to break ranks and vote to end it ([05:04] Andrew Prokop).
• Motivations:
  • Concerns over escalating hardship for constituents—unpaid federal employees, suspended benefits, delayed flights ([09:43] Andrew Prokop).
  • Key defectors were retiring or from purple states, less bound by primary pressures to keep fighting ([07:47] Andrew Prokop).
• Political Optics: The party base demanded a fight after previous perceived retreats by leadership; shutdown endurance was thus partly performative ([07:47] Andrew Prokop).

3. Tipping Points: Why Now?

• Escalating Impacts: Public frustration as SNAP benefits stopped and flights delayed—the shutdown became felt outside the “Beltway bubble.”
  • “Once we get into this realm of snap benefits being canceled and flights being delayed or canceled, that's when the impact on ordinary people...gets more pronounced and painful.” ([09:43] Andrew Prokop)
• No Progress, No Concessions: Despite polling showing Trump blamed, he remained unmoved, raising the specter of eliminating the filibuster to end the impasse unilaterally ([10:58] Andrew Prokop).

4. Democratic Infighting & Schumer’s Leadership

• Blowback on Schumer: The party’s base and some members blame Senate leader Chuck Schumer for failing to deliver on promises and losing caucus control ([19:05] David Axelrod).
• Recurring Pattern: Recent leadership moves are seen as repeated episodes of “charging up the hill and then rolling down again,” casting doubt on Schumer’s future ([20:52] David Axelrod).
• Axelrod on Schumer’s Problem:

  “He hasn't handled communications particularly well around these things. And I do wonder, honestly, Schumer is a superior fundraiser. He's very supportive of his members. But I wonder if he's in this gig for the long run.” ([19:57] David Axelrod)

• Potential for Insurgent Challenge: The shutdown outcome is expected to fuel primary campaigns by establishment challengers ([23:42] David Axelrod).

5. The Road Ahead: What Comes Next?

• Short-Term Relief: The deal needs final Senate and then House votes amid expectations of Democratic opposition, with House Speaker Johnson needing to wrangle hardliners ([11:55] Andrew Prokop).
• No Lasting Solution: Government funding runs out again at January’s end—expect a repeat crisis ([12:29] Andrew Prokop).

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

On What the Deal Delivers – and Doesn’t:

• Andrew Prokop:

  “So not much, to be honest. This is kind of just a status quo restart the government's funding...” ([02:35])

• David Axelrod:

  “You can get 100 votes here in the Senate—won't mean anything because the House is not going to take it up, and the President...certainly will not sign it.” ([03:39])

On the Democrats’ Motivation to Cave:

• Andrew Prokop:

  “We’ve stoked the longest shutdown in history. We tried to make our messaging point, but...we’re not making any progress on getting Trump to agree to any concessions...so it’s time to just…bring it to a close.” ([06:00])

• David Axelrod:

  “As the shoes started to pinch…in terms of food security or airport security, I think there was a sense of nervousness amongst those who broke about imposing those things on people to carry on the fight...” ([17:01])

On Schumer’s Leadership Woes:

• David Axelrod:

  “...the idea that you charge up the Hill and then roll down again. And I think this time it looked as if he got rolled by some members of his own caucus that he wasn't in command of his own caucus.” ([20:08])

• On the mood among frustrated Democrats:

  “I got a text this morning from someone who I deeply respect...‘Man, oh man, we are so fucked. These senators are killing the republic.’ This from a prominent Democrat.” ([21:41])

On Electoral and Political Fallout:

• David Axelrod:

  “I would think that it [the shutdown outcome] will [fuel insurgents]…But in terms of the November election, I honestly don’t think this is…I think you’re gonna see Democrats come out in large numbers…at the end of the day, it’s about Trump.” ([23:42])

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [00:09] – Shutdown deal reached after six weeks
• [02:10] – Details on Senate defection & what’s in the bill
• [03:20 - 04:45] – Democrats’ failed demands and why deal is labeled a cave
• [05:04 - 07:47] – “Vote no, hope yes,” internal consensus, and why Democrats broke ranks
• [09:43] – Tipping point: SNAP benefits and flight cancellations escalate public pain
• [11:03] – Filibuster politics and why Trump’s push is tabled
• [12:29] – What's next: another shutdown on the horizon
• [16:39] – Axelrod segment: motivations for defectors and Schumer’s future
• [19:05 - 20:52] – Internal party blowback on Schumer’s handling of the shutdown
• [23:35] – Axelrod on insurgency vs. establishment and 2025/26 political implications

---

Conclusion

This episode offers a candid look at how political necessity and public pressure forced Senate Democrats to end a losing standoff, resulting in party division, leadership questions, and fuel for future insurgent campaigns. Though some activists and leaders are frustrated, the hosts and guests agree that for most Americans, the priority was simply ending the government shutdown—leaving more fundamental party fights for another day.

Transcript

[Estad Herndon]

So after all that, it looks like we have a deal.

[David Axelrod]

I am optimistic that after almost six weeks of this shutdown, we finally will.

[Andrew Prokop]

Finally be able to end it.

[Estad Herndon]

If everything holds, the government should reopen by the end of the week, putting an end to the longest shutdown in U.S. history.

[David Axelrod]

As of this morning, there was a zero chance of having work on the aca. Now there's a measurable chance.

[Andrew Prokop]

Will it be everything that everybody wanted?

[David Axelrod]

No, because we need 60 votes. And so there's going to be a negotiation.

[Andrew Prokop]

But Republicans have already started saying, well.

[David Axelrod]

Here, you know, if you did this or did that, maybe we can get there.

[Estad Herndon]

So what was it all for? And why did some Democrats cave to Republicans and President Trump? That's coming up on TODAY Explained from vox.

[TODAY Explained Announcer]

Support for TODAY Explained comes from March of Dimes. Every year in the US about 1 in 10 babies is born preterm. It doesn't have to be that way, says March of Dimes. For more than 85 years, March of Dimes has led the fight for health of moms and babies. With supporters like you, they fund research, they provide education, they do advocacy. They offer programs and services so every family can get the best possible start. You can donate today at marchofdimes.org Vox that's marchofdimes.org Vox how do more than.

[David Axelrod]

100 million Fortnite players join the battle without lag?

[Andrew Prokop]

AWS is how epic games scales up to keep them in the action.

[David Axelrod]

AWS powers next level innovation for millions of businesses.

[Estad Herndon]

You're listening to TODAY Explained. Okay, so Andrew Prokop, senior political correspondent for Vox, it seems as if Senate Democrats and Republicans have reached the deal to end the shutdown, the longest shutdown in American history. Can you tell me what we know about it so far?

[Andrew Prokop]

So the deal came together pretty quickly on Sunday. So eight senators who caucus with Democrats.

[Sponsor Voice]

Have broken rank with their party to.

[Andrew Prokop]

Advance a Republican plan to end the shutdown. The bill advanced by a vote of 60 to 40, just barely meeting the 60 votes needed to keep it moving forward. It'll have to pass the Senate and then the House and be signed by Trump, of course. But for now, seems to be moving as to what's actually in it.

[Estad Herndon]

Yeah, what's in the deal?

[Andrew Prokop]

So not much, to be honest. This is kind of just a status quo restart the government's funding and continue it on until the next expiration, which will be the end of January.

[David Axelrod]

This agreement funds SNAP and food assistance programs, ensures that law enforcement, air traffic controllers and other federal workers get paid, reverses the President's recent reckless layoffs and prevents them from happening in the future and crucially gives Congress a clear path forward to protecting people's health care.

[Andrew Prokop]

But, you know, that's all just undoing stuff that happened during the shutdown itself.

[Estad Herndon]

Yeah, cleaning up their own mess.

[Andrew Prokop]

Yes. As far as the big picture demand, which Democrats made, which was to extend the expiring Affordable Care act subsidies, they got not much. They got a commitment for the Senate to hold a vote sometime before the end of the year, but really, that's nothing.

[David Axelrod]

You can get 100 votes here in the Senate won't mean anything because the House is not going to take it up, and the President of the United States certainly will not sign it.

[Andrew Prokop]

And so basically, they struck out on that, and that was their stated demand. A lot of Democrats wanted something more from the shutdown, some sort of deeper concessions from Donald Trump in some form, and those didn't happen at all. Trump basically made no concessions. And so I think the many are characterizing this as essentially a Democratic cave, and I think that's largely correct.

[Estad Herndon]

This health care crisis is so severe, so urgent, so devastating for families back home, that I cannot in good faith support this CR that fails to address the health care crisis. So it seems like beyond the kind of nuts and bolts of reopening the government, only thing Republicans conceded was a promise to hold a vote on the health care subsidies that Democrats have been focused on in the coming months.

[Andrew Prokop]

That's right.

[Estad Herndon]

All right. Well, based on all that, it would seem as if the conclusion that Democrats caved, or at least some wanted the shutdown to end on their own, is an obvious one. So what was motivating the seven Democrats and one Independent who worked with Republicans to end this shutdown? Why did they break from their caucus?

[Andrew Prokop]

Yeah. So in a dynamic like this, where almost every Senate Democrat voted against this deal and they're saying, oh, we need to fight harder, we need to keep going, but somehow the eight magical votes materialize to cut the deal. And typically, that doesn't happen via a actual break from what party leadership wants. Typically. What explains this scenario is what's known as the vote no hope yes approach, that a lot of Democrats are. Are continuing to vote no. But in reality, there is kind of a consensus in the party that enough is enough. We made our point. We're not making any progress on getting Trump to agree to any concessions. A lot of the damage is now spiraling out. Federal workers haven't been paid for over a month. Many have been forced to work without pay. Like air traffic controllers, snap benefits are being suspended. Flights are now being delayed or canceled. And I think there was a sense that, okay, we've stoked the longest shutdown in history. We tried to make our messaging point, but in the end, the federal government has to reopen. We're not going to, like, keep it shut down forever. And we don't see any path towards getting the things we actually wanted by stoking this shutdown fight. So it's time to just kind of cut bait and bring it to a close. The Democrats who actually voted for this deal, they were kind of a grab bag of purple state Democrats and retiring Democrats. Some were moderate, some are liberal, but a lot of Democrats, the default position was to make the base happy by continuing to fight. And when we see retiring Democrats saying, oh, actually, I'm going to vote for this, it's a signal that actually, you know, in their heart of hearts, probably there is broader support for this deal in the Democratic Caucus than many are currently admitting.

[Estad Herndon]

I mean, I saw Governor Elect Abigail Spamberger of Virginia say that she wanted the government to open immediately.

[TODAY Explained Announcer]

The entirety of Virginia's economy is impacted by this shutdown, just as we've been impacted by DOGE attacks. And the government needs to reopen quickly.

[Estad Herndon]

And it would seem as if, from what you're saying, that that sentiment might be a wider held one among Congressional Democrats, or at least among Senate Democrats, than they may have let on, at least because these eight senators joined up with Republicans to functionally keep the government open.

[Andrew Prokop]

Yes. And you know, Spanberger, she represents Virginia, and Virginia is obviously very important state for federal workers, and a lot of her constituents haven't been paid. And I think what came clear in Spanberger's comments is that she didn't buy into what has been sold as the logic of this shutdown, which is that it was a very important fight against Donald Trump's authoritarianism, that it was a way to stand up to Trump. This is what the base wanted. This is why the Democratic base was furious that Schumer cut a government funding deal several months ago, because they wanted to fight and stand up for Donald Trump. And this was believed to be the leverage that Democrats had over Trump, that Republicans need Democratic votes to keep the government funded. So why not try to sort of to fight him, to get him to back down on some of his authoritarian practices? Or the eventual demand that the Democratic caucus settled on was, okay, let's just focus on this issue of the Affordable Care act subsidies that are expiring. And I think most of the political strategists in the party knew that going in. And the shutdown, I think, was privately understood to always be kind of like a losing fight, but something that, you know, the base was so furious when it wasn't even tried last time around that they had to at least try it this time. And they tried it for over a month, the longest shutdown in history. And Donald Trump has not put forward any concessions. So I think they decided enough's enough, made our point and let's move on.

[Estad Herndon]

Do you think there was a tipping point here? How much did things like flight cancellations or snap benefit reduction, you think play a role in this coming to an end?

[Andrew Prokop]

I think they're important. I think it's kind of all important that the damage has been piling up. It's been kind of easy to ignore the shutdown for many people, for those not personally affected for quite a while. But once we get into this realm of snap benefits being canceled and flights being delayed or canceled, that's when the impact on ordinary people who don't work for the federal government specifically gets more pronounced and painful. Some Democrats were saying, fine, like, you know, this is hard nosed political combat. We are winning in the realm of politics and messaging. Polls show that Trump is getting more of the blame for the shutdown. His approval has dropped, so why not keep fighting? Regardless of the damage to the people affected by this, we are winning and we should keep going and kind of force Trump to agree or cave in some way. But I think what became clear in recent days is that Trump definitely wasn't going to cave. What he was going to do was to keep turning up the pressure on Republicans in the Senate to eliminate the filibuster, and that would have let them reopen the government with their votes alone.

[Estad Herndon]

What do you think happens to Trump's push to abolish the filibuster? Does that just go away?

[Andrew Prokop]

I think for now it will go away. You know, Trump has been arguing that the Senate should abolish the filibuster since 2017, and they've been ignoring him since then because Democrats did cut the deal in the end. I think this does take some of the air out of this trial balloon of we should eliminate the filibuster, but you know it's going to come back. The partisan logic under polarization of the filibuster is a powerful obstructionist weapon for the minority. And if the majority feels that it's being abused, the majority can just take it away. That's going to continue. I don't know exactly how much longer the filibuster has before its likely demise, whether it's a few years or whether it's longer than that. But it doesn't seem sustainable over the long term.

[Estad Herndon]

What happens next? What's the next step for the government reopening?

[Andrew Prokop]

Well, the Senate has to give final approval to this deal. Then it will go to the House, where a lot of House Democrats, most if not all, are expected to oppose it. And then it will be a lot of big drama about whether Mike Johnson can nail down the Republican votes, including the cranky hardliners in the GOP conference about passing this deal. And then it would go to Trump's desk. But really, it's kind of just kicking the can down the road. We are going to be doing this again at the end of January.

[Estad Herndon]

Mm. Come the end of January, there'll be another fight about government funding and we may be in the same place.

[Andrew Prokop]

Yes, except I'll be on parental leave, so I won't be there.

[Estad Herndon]

So you'll be in a better place.

[Andrew Prokop]

I'll be stuck, mercifully excused from the next shutdown fight.

[Estad Herndon]

Awesome. Andrew Prokop, senior political correspondent for Vox so some Democrats caved and the shutdown seems to be ending. Coming up, Was it all worth it?

[TODAY Explained Announcer]

Support for TODAY Explained comes from Quince Winter's here and winter is cold. How about some layers that Last? Sweaters, outerwear, everyday essentials that feel luxurious, look timeless and make holiday dressing effortless. $50 Mongolian cashmere sweaters, down outerwear built to take on the season and Italian wool coats perfect for gifting or just for you. Here's Nisha Chital Sweater weather is like my ideal weather. And Quince has such a huge sweater selection.

[Sponsor Voice]

I got the organic cotton cropped cardigan in this like chocolate brown color. It's feels really, you know, polished and will work with a lot of different things.

[TODAY Explained Announcer]

Step into the holiday season with layers made to feel good, look polished and last. From Quince, perfect for gifting or keeping for yourself. Go to quince.com explain for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada to Canadians. That's Q U I-n c e.com explained. Free shipping 365 day returns quince.com explained support for today Explained comes from Found. Running a small business is hard, says Found. There's the sales, there's the hiring, there's the customer support. Found is a business banking platform that says they can let you effortlessly track expenses, manage invoices and prepare for taxes all in one place. Found says they've identified the things that create the most hassle for small businesses. Categorizing expenses expenses, prepping for taxes, Managing invoicing, budgeting. And they say that they have built an app that does it all directly from your business checking account. They say they can help you uncover tax write offs and free up valuable time. Time you can put toward chasing new opportunities. You can take back control of your business. Today you can open a Found account for free at found.com that's F-U-N-D.com found is a financial technology company. It is not a bank. Banking services are provided by lead bank member fdic. You can join the hundreds of thousands who've already streamlined their finances with Found.

[Andrew Prokop]

Support for this show comes from Indeed. If you're looking to hire top tier talent with expertise in your field, Indeed says they can help. Indeed Sponsored Jobs gives your job the best chance at standing out and grants you access to quality candidates who can drive the results you need. Spend more time interviewing candidates who check all your boxes. Less stress, less time, more results. Now with Indeed Sponsored Jobs and listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit to help get your job the premium status it deserves@ Indeed.com VoxBusiness just go to Indeed.com FoxBusiness right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Indeed.com VoxBusiness Terms and Conditions apply. Hiring do it the right way with Indeed. The House will be in order. The clerk may call the roll today.

[TODAY Explained Announcer]

Yay Explained. Yay.

[Estad Herndon]

So how should we think about last Tuesday's results which seemed like such good news for Democrats given this week's news which seems to show the party on completely different pages, at least when it comes to the shutdown? I call David Axelrod, Democratic political strategist and my first question was why he thinks some Democrats folded on the shutdown.

[David Axelrod]

I think as the shoes started to pinch of the shutdown and real life impacts were being felt, be it in terms of food security or airport security, I think there was a sense of nervousness amongst those who broke about imposing those things on people to carry on the fight and perhaps some suspicion that they were not going to be successful at the back end. So why endure the pain?

[Estad Herndon]

There was some sense that the election could embolden Democrats because it seemed as if at least the anti Trump sentiment in the electorate was confirmed. Why do you think it went the opposite direction, at least for the group of Democrats who have seemed to join with Republicans to end this shutdown.

[David Axelrod]

Well, first of all, I think it says a lot that the Democrat, none of the Democrats who voted for for it are on the ballot next year and several of them, or at least two of them, are retiring. So the folks with the least risk were among the folks who cast these votes. Look, I think Tuesday could go two ways, right? One is it satisfied Democrats that Democrats had a pulse that Democrats could fight and win because Democrats did fight and win on Tuesday. And so to some degree, that may have released some of the pressure rather than emboldened. But more than anything, I think that the folks who voted wanted out of it and believed that the longer it went, the more, you know, both parties would bear the blame and people would suffer.

[Estad Herndon]

In reaction to the announcement of this deal, we have seen some Democrats take implicit and some explicit swipes at Senate leader Chuck Schumer. Are you surprised at the level of blowback that it seems Senate Democratic leadership is coming under from this deal? And if not, where is that coming from?

[David Axelrod]

Not at all. I'm not at all surprised. All you have to do is go back to March when the last continuing resolution was passed. And after telling Democrats for a month in advance that Democrats were going to fight, fight, fight, Schumer led the retreat and, and was absolutely excoriated for it. And a lot of people thought that was one of the impetuses for him to want to fight this time. And I thought Democrats very appropriately focused on the Affordable Care act because these subsidies were expiring and premiums are, as people now know, going to go up exponentially for people around the country, at least 20 million people. So it made sense. But here's the thing. I mean, Schumer suffered here for what he suffered from. Then the idea that you charge up the Hill and then roll down again. And I think this time it looked as if he got rolled by some members of his own caucus that he wasn't in command of his own caucus. And so, you know, he just, he hasn't handled communications particularly well around these things. And I do wonder, honestly, Schumer is a superior fundraiser. He's very supportive of his members. But I wonder if he's in this gig for the long run.

[Estad Herndon]

I mean, it seems as if some of the critics are pointing out one of two problems with him. Either it's an expectation setting issue and Democrats think that what he has been able to promise Democrats in terms of fight has not matched what they've delivered, or, you know, it seems as if the whole caucus is not in line behind him. Both of those seem to spell not great signs for the Democratic leader.

[David Axelrod]

Yeah, no, I think he's got problems, you know, and he's going to have to make a decision as to whether he runs for reelection in 2028. And Democrats are going to have to make a decision as to whether they want him to be the leader in 2027. And I think both of those are open questions and maybe someone will take a run at him here, though I think the caucus would pro by him. Look, the, one of the, one of the impacts of the Trump 2 era here is that until last Tuesday, Democrats felt supine and in relation to Trump, like he was running over them. And so anything that lends to it is going to incite Democrats. I got a text this morning from someone who I deeply, deeply respect, who's someone who's been around Washington a long time, who said, man, oh man, we are so fucked. These senators are killing the republic. This from a prominent Democrat.

[Estad Herndon]

I mean, that's dire. That's not small stuff.

[David Axelrod]

It got my attention. Now I will say this, this doesn't let Republicans off the hook because there's going, you know, if there's not a vote, you inflame the Democrats again in the Congress. But more than that, if these premiums go up on schedule and nothing is done, you own them.

[Estad Herndon]

I wanted to know how we should calibrate this in terms of the excitement we saw from the party last week. I think sometimes with these kind of congressional fights specifically, it's hard to know exactly where the chips land when people go to vote next November. How much do we think this kind of shutdown plays in folks minds? And does it at any point damper the excitement we saw from Democrats just last week?

[David Axelrod]

You know, I, I really doubt it. I think what it may do is put a little bit more jet fuel behind some of the insurgent Democratic candidates because, you know, I think that there is real jaundice about sort of status quo figures in politics. And candidates who were embraced by Chuck Schumer probably don't take a step forward here, even though he voted against this thing. Platner in Maine, for example, the oyster fisherman who's giving the governor of that state a run for her money in that primary. El said in Michigan, you know, those kinds of candidates are going to take this issue and run it against figures who are seen as part of the establishment that knuckled under here in the.

[Estad Herndon]

Primary season that was already set to pit insurgents versus establishment. This becomes another wedge in the fight.

[David Axelrod]

I would think so. I would think that it will. But in terms of the November election, I honestly don't think this is. I think you're gonna see Democrats come out in large numbers, as you saw on Tuesday, because at the end of the day, it's about Trump. Yeah, and it's going to be about Trump. Just parenthetically, I said, I. It's been stunning to me how Trump has reacted to the election. What do you mean? And he has reacted in classic Trumpian fashion, which is. What are you talking about? Affordability. Energy is way down. Look at energy. We're going to have $2 gasoline. I did that. That brings everything else down. Groceries are way down, other than beef. Now beef is going to come down. You know, we have to do that. You remember when I started, eggs were up by four times what they were previous. You know, it was in two days in the office and they told me about eggs. I solved that. Because the fact is, we have prices way down. We have prices down. This is precisely, precisely the thing that, that really killed Joe Biden politically. I mean, at the end, the final blow was his denial of the conditions that exist now. You know, in his case, I think people said, well, he's out of touch. He doesn't know what's going on. I mean, Trump said that. In Trump's case, the suspicion may not be that he's not in touch, but that he just doesn't care.

[Estad Herndon]

Last question, I would say, is just one about your sense of people's reaction to this deal, particularly the ones who have criticized Schumer and the Democrats who got on board. What is the salience of that message, do you think? Like, it's hard for me to gauge how many Americans are. Would want Democrats to fight versus how many Americans would just want the government to be open. Is there some sense of view that's like maybe this is the best Democrats could have done, that this was the way the shutdown was always going to end?

[David Axelrod]

Yeah, no, I think there is. I think that's a fair analysis. And I think it's the analysis that the eight who voted the way they did made from the start. I mean, a number of them were negotiating for this deal for weeks. I think they gave Schumer the room to throw out the one year extension of the Affordable Care act after their caucus on Tuesday to see if that would fly. And Thune, I think probably knowing that he had this deal in his back pocket, shot it down immediately. You know, it's a danger of negotiating against yourself, but I think the vast number of Americans probably think two things. Yes, they think we have a health care crisis and they're angry about that, but they also felt like this thing needed to come to an end. But among activist Democrats who believe deeply in this health care issue, I think this one stings.

[Estad Herndon]

Thank you so much, David, for your time. We really appreciate it.

[David Axelrod]

Always good to be with you.

[Estad Herndon]

David Axelrod, political analyst and commentator for cnn. Today's show was produced by Kelly Wezinger with help from Avishai Artsy. It was edited by Amina Al Saadi. Fact Checked by Peter Baladan Rosen with help from Ariana Ospadu engineered by Patrick Boyd and Adrienne Lilly. I'm Estad Herndon. This is Today Explained.

[Sponsor Voice]

Investing doesn't have to be complicated at SoFi. Everything you need is in one simple, easy to use app. Trade stocks and ETFs and even get access to to IPOs before they hit the exchange with Sofi Securities. Or take a more hands off approach with SoFi's award winning low cost robo advisor. Through SoFi Wealth Plus, SoFi goes beyond the basics. Along with traditional options, you have access to alternatives like real estate and private markets to build a broader portfolio. And here's the when you open and fund a new active investing account, you'll get up to $1,000 in stock terms apply. That's real money working for you from day one. So whether you want to pick your own path or let the experts guide you, SoFi makes it easier to build your wealth in one place. Learn more and get [e-mail] profginvest that's sofi.com profginvest this is a paid advertisement by SoFi Technologies and is not intended to be financial advice. Adobe Acrobat Studio so brand new. Show me all the things PDFs can do. Do your work with ease and speed. PDF space. This is all you need. Do hours of research in an instant with key insights from an AI assistant. Take a template with a click. Now your prezo looks super slick. Close that deal. Yeah, you won. Do that, doing that, did that, done. Now you can do that. Do that with Acrobat. Now you can do that. Do that with the all new Acrobat. It's time to do your best work with the all new Adobe Acrobat Studio.