Podcast Summary: "Can the special relationship survive Trump’s attacks on Starmer?"

Podcast: Today in Focus (The Guardian)
Host: Lucy Hough
Guest: Peter Walker, Senior Political Correspondent
Date: March 18, 2026
Episode Length: ~10 minutes

Overview

This episode of Today in Focus’ evening roundup, "The Latest," explores the escalating tension in UK-US relations amid President Trump’s repeated personal attacks on UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Host Lucy Hough and Guardian senior political correspondent Peter Walker examine how these attacks—and the UK’s shifting position on the conflict in Iran—are impacting the so-called “special relationship,” domestic politics, and the UK's foreign policy priorities, particularly regarding Ukraine. The discussion also touches on reactions within the UK political spectrum and upcoming diplomatic events, such as King Charles’s possible visit to Washington.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Unprecedented UK Political Response to Trump’s Attacks

[00:11 – 01:16]

• Kemi Badenoch (Leader of the Opposition) uncharacteristically voiced support for PM Starmer, condemning Trump’s personal attacks as "childish."
• Badenoch continued to differentiate her stance from the government on Iran but decided, according to speculation, that public opinion warranted publicly rebuking Trump.
• Peter Walker points out that given Trump’s unpopularity with UK voters (and worsening poll numbers), such attacks—though diplomatically uncomfortable—may not be politically damaging:

  “Number 10 have almost realized that being attacked by President Trump, while in many ways is not good... if you have to be attacked by him in terms of voters’ impressions of you, it’s not always a bad thing.” — Peter Walker [01:13]

2. Shifting Positions on the Iran War and Political Fallout

[02:13 – 04:17]

• Host and guest highlight significant public and political opposition in the UK to involvement in the Iran conflict.
• Badenoch initially called for strong UK support for the US and Israel but rapidly reversed course as polling turned against war:

  "Her initial response to the war was to say Britain should absolutely support the US and Israel... she's quite quickly had to U-turn on that position." — Lucy Hough [02:13]

• Labour leader Starmer capitalized on Badenoch’s U-turn, repeatedly challenging her in Parliament.
• Walker elaborates:

  "Their position is... when the US Israel attack first took place on February 28, Kerry Badenot was quickly out of the blocks... But as time has gone on, the more the polls show that the British public seem to think that this war is a war without a plan..." — Peter Walker [03:01]

3. Domestic Political Ramifications for Starmer and Opposition Leaders

[04:17 – 06:27]

• Trump’s continued criticism: Called Starmer “no Winston Churchill” and suggested UK lacks gratitude toward the US.
• Despite personal unpopularity, Starmer is seen by peers as having handled the Trump issue deftly—initially trying to build rapport, then distancing as public opinion shifted:

  “As the months have gone on, he’s trod a quite delicate path and done it quite well.” — Peter Walker [05:04]

• Liberal Democrats uniquely outspoken in challenging the logic of treating Trump as a typical US president:

  "They were the only ones who basically said, this president is not like other presidents, he can't be trusted. It's like, you know, a Christmas dinner and your slightly drunk uncle..." — Peter Walker [05:38]

4. The Special Relationship: Can It Withstand the Strain?

[06:27 – 08:19]

• Early “bromance” between Trump and Starmer appears to be fracturing; previous compliments now seem puzzling given recent hostility.
• King Charles’s planned visit to Washington raises diplomatic questions—concerns about perceived snubs if cancelled, but Walker says Royals are practiced in managing difficult figures:

  “The tolerance of, you know, kings and princes of the British royal family, for, you know, slightly dodgy people, their tolerance is pretty great. They've had to shake hands and schmooze with a lot of slightly unsavoury people. So King Charles is a pro. I'm sure he'll cope.” — Peter Walker [07:50]

5. Ukraine: The Real Strategic Worry

[08:19 – 09:41]

• Starmer’s urge to keep relations with the US workable is tied to British support for Ukraine; without US backing, the UK’s role is limited.
• Ukrainian President Zelensky’s visit to London underscores concern over distraction from Ukraine due to the Iran crisis.
• UK’s cross-party consensus on Ukraine marks it as a “secular religion” in domestic politics:

  "Ukraine is who we back and there's obviously very good vested interest for the UK... This is the one thing that no British politician of any colour wants to gamble with." — Peter Walker [09:15]

Notable Quotes

• Kemi Badenoch on Trump’s attacks:

  "The words coming from the White House are completely wrong. I think it's actually quite childish, to be honest." — Kemi Badenoch via Peter Walker (00:11–00:17)

• On public opinion:

  “All the polling shows that amongst UK voters, President Trump has never been popular, and as the months go on, he gets less and less popular.”
  — Peter Walker (01:11)

• On the challenges of maintaining the special relationship:

  “It's like, you know, a Christmas dinner and your slightly drunk uncle has been gradually making increasingly kind of off colour and racist comments. Everyone's trying to pretend it's not being said and someone said, you know, uncle George, this is wrong. And then no one can pretend the silence has been broken, the kind of dam has burst a little bit.”
  — Peter Walker (05:38)

• On UK’s support for Ukraine:

  “The defense of Ukraine is one of the very, very few, almost universal cross-party policies within the UK. It's become this kind of secular religion for politics in the UK. You know, Ukraine is who we back...”
  — Peter Walker (09:09)

Timestamps for Key Segments

• [00:11] — Kemi Badenoch’s condemnation of Trump’s attacks
• [01:16] — Badenoch’s rare support for PM Starmer; UK public opinion on Trump
• [02:13] — Shifts in UK political leaders’ stances on the Iran conflict
• [04:17] — Trump’s “no Churchill” jab; what this means for Starmer
• [05:38] — Liberal Democrats break silence on treating Trump as different
• [06:27] — Fracturing personal relations and diplomatic context
• [07:50] — The role of King Charles’s upcoming US visit
• [08:19] — Ukraine as the central pillar of UK-US cooperation

Memorable Moments

• Comparison of Trump in diplomatic relations to a “drunk uncle” at Christmas dinner breaks the otherwise measured tone with vivid imagery.
• The discussion of King Charles’s diplomatic resilience highlights the enduring nature of certain UK institutions, regardless of political turbulence.
• Analysis zeroes in on Ukraine as the linchpin issue commanding near-total agreement across UK politics, in contrast to more divisive questions over Iran.

Conclusion

This episode dissects the diplomatic and political tremors caused by Trump’s open hostility toward Keir Starmer, set against the backdrop of unpopular foreign entanglements and complex US-UK ties. While the “special relationship” appears battered, UK domestic politics—and the deeper imperative of defending Ukraine—ensure a level of pragmatic continuity beneath the headline drama.

For further reporting, visit: theguardian.com
Stay updated with “The Latest” on all major podcast platforms.