B (3:36)

Yeah.

A (3:36)

And I didn't even mention the fact that a carrier strike group has arrived in Iran. Like, the. The list of things to cover is way too.

B (3:45)

It's getting crazy. We need that DJ Khaled button. Another one, because I just got another one. Just another one. Another one. And just keep pressing. Not too soon. All right, let's grab this.

A (3:56)

I hate how both funny and appropriate that is.

B (4:00)

What was your read on Minnesota? Because that's definitely the thing we need to talk about.

A (4:03)

Yeah, it wasn't good. It remains not good. But to lay down the facts. On January 24th, Alex Preddy, a 37 year old ICU nurse at a Minneapolis VA hospital, was shot and killed by ICE agents in the back back, by the way, during an immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis. Bystander videos make it pretty clear. And there's so many of them coming out. And they show that Preddy himself was filming the federal agents as they made their way down the street on foot. The situation escalated when an agent shoved a woman to the ground. Preddy stepped in to assist her, putting his arm around her, at which point agents pepper spray and grab him and force him to the ground, while Preddy was pinned to the ground by several agents. Video pretty clearly shows the following. We're going to show some of this, but not all of it. For reasons that'll be obvious, but Preddy was holding a cell phone in his right hand. An agent finds and removes. That's an important part of this story. An agent finds and removes a handgun from Preddy's waistband. Basically had it tucked in his back. That agent then quickly turns around and walks off with the gun. Very shortly after that, as Preddy continues to struggle, which we will certainly talk about that part of it, agents fire at least 10 shots over roughly five seconds, killing Preddy right where he lay. And if my read of the videos is accurate. The first shots go into his back. Man, it is horrific. And with the ability to watch the video over and over in slow motion, it seems like Preddy is not only shot after being disarmed, but, as I said, shot in the back multiple times. Needless to say, the narrative battle of what actually happened is raging. If you've seen the footage, it is very easy to understand why people are absolutely aghast at this shooting. From where I'm sitting, the shooting is completely unjustified. The man was disarmed, and yes, he was resisting, which, for my money, is absolutely lunatic behavior. However, shooting him full stop is horrific. But shooting him in the back is ghoulish. It is completely unforgivable. But as with so many things, as more and more detailed analysis kept coming out over the weekend, after the ridiculous claims that he was wielding a weapon, that he was aggressively threatening ICE agents with a gun, as all of that evaporated, a new narrative began to gain traction. Namely, that the gun that was removed from Preddy allegedly misfired as the ICE agent whisked it away. And it was the sound of the first shot that made the ICE officer shoot Preddy, thinking he had a gun and was firing. Now, if you've seen the video, given how clumsy, jittery, and untrained the whole debacle looked, I would not be surprised if that's what happened. That doesn't mean that this is okay. It just means that the horrific, tragic sequence of events may have included the misfiring of the gun. Now, if you watch the video in slow motion, it really does look like the gun may have accidentally discharged the. Additionally, there are unverified reports that the gun was a Sig Sauer, a gun with multiple lawsuits alleging that it misfired. Now, at this point, I know the FBI has the gun in custody, so that might have been verified. At this point, we'll have to look that up. But apparently, despite the Sig Sauer themselves, the company denying that the gun has any issues, it is an open secret, apparently, in the gun community that that particular gun will discharge without the trigger being pulled. Obviously very rare, but seems to happen. Now, regardless of whether the shooting ends up being incompetence or malice, it's shaping up to be the spark that lights all of the dynamite bundled up in Minnesota. And I am expecting things to continue to escalate from here, Especially all the things that we've seen with the coordination, the instruction manuals on how to track and disrupt ice, all of the signal groups that were infiltrated so we see just how much coordination there is. If I can bring a little Mike Benz to all of this. Mike Benz's read that NGOs have been specifically using tactics like this. First it was the CIA doing this kind of stuff abroad, now NGOs bringing this in to domestic use. So all of that is going to be coming out as well. But this is an unmitigated disaster. And ultimately it's going to be up to all of us to slow this down, to try to find ways to de escalate, to hopefully convince Trump that you cannot just keep pushing this forward. You can't keep escalating. You can't just keep hammering people until morale improves. Like that isn't going to work, especially not if this is an organized resistance. And I understand there are going to be people on the right whose inclination is one of emotion that you just, you can't let people get away with this, that you have to hammer them down. You absolutely have to get law and order back in place. There is no doubt about that. But you've got to get law and order on the back of cooperation with local state government. I think the reason that we're seeing all of this pop off in Minnesota and not elsewhere is multivariate. We're going to be talking about the depth of the fraud and all of that. But I think a big part of the reason that you're seeing this escalation in Minnesota is because we don't have that cooperation. And if the federal government makes the mistake of having an only up escalatory response, then the people are going to be justified more and more for pushing back. Remember, we have a second Amendment in this country for a reason. We had a founding father who believed and stated very clearly that liberty is secured or must be watered. I think was the exact quote, must be watered by the blood of patriots and the tyrannical alike. So this is one of those things where you've got a nation with a history of using weapons to stand up against tyrannical governments. You have it baked into our DNA. And so if you just use the hammer, then you're going to see further and further escalation and people are going to needlessly die. So while I think it is insane to resist arrest, at the same time I think it is insane to send a roving band of angry young men into these situations without the necessary level of restraint or even feeling of safety so that they can, in a coordinated fashion, calm these things down. But that's not what's happening. And so I certainly don't agree with Minnesota's response, but I don't agree with the current federal response, which is only making things worse. We're hitting pause for a moment, but there's plenty more ahead, so don't go anywhere Every SIM card has a permanent id. It's called an imsi. Your carrier assigns it once and it never changes. That ID follows you everywhere. Your carrier tracks it, advertisers track it, bad actors track it, VPNs can't hide it, and encrypted apps can't change it. Kape solves this with identifier rotation. Your SIM ID automatically changes every 24 hours. Same phone number, new identity every single day, making you untraceable. But Kape doesn't stop there. Your phone number itself is protected by a 24 word cryptographic phrase, your voicemail is encrypted, your payment data is tokenized, and Kape's enhanced signaling protection blocks suspicious network connections. Before attacks Happen, head to Cape Co Impact and use code IMPACT to get 33% off your first six months with Cape. That's C A P E co Impact and be sure to use Code impact to save 33% when temperatures drop, your wardrobe either works or it doesn't. Doesn't Premium materials aren't just about luxury. They're functional requirements. Mongolian cashmere, Italian leather, wool coats that actually keep you warm. That's performance gear. I ordered a Mongolian cashmere sweater from Quince as a gift last month. When it arrived, I was very impressed. Super soft, high quality, exactly what you'd expect from luxury cashmere, except it was $50 instead of $400. Quince cuts out the middlemen and traditional markups. No department stores, no luxury retail overhead. Same factories producing for high end brands. Same materials, same rigorous standards for craftsmanship and ethical production. They just deliver it direct. Their winter lineup has everything you need. Mongolian cashmere sweaters, wool coats, down jackets, Italian leather and suede outerwear built to hold up season after season. Classic styles that don't fall apart after one winter. Plus free shipping on every order. 365 day returns and zero risk. Refresh your winter wardrobe with Quince. Go to quints.comimpactpod for free shipping on your order. Plus that 365 day return policy now available in Canada too. That's Quince Q U I n c e.com impact pod Free shipping and 365 day returns. Quints.com impact pod let's talk about getting the most out of your health data. Your Apple Watch collects an incredible Amount of data, then does absolutely nothing with it. That's not health tracking, that's just data hoarding. Bevel turns that data into actual intelligence. This is what your Apple watch should have been from day one. Bevel consolidates everything into one platform. Sleep tracking, nutrition logging, fitness monitoring, recovery scores, habit tracking, stress levels, all in one place instead of scattered across five different apps. Bevel's AI is also proactive. It doesn't wait for you to ask questions. It analyzes your metrics in real time and tells you what you need to know. It holds you accountable to your goals. It remembers your lifestyle and tailors every suggestion specifically to you. And your data stays private, stored on your device, not on servers. Head to Bevel Health slash Impact and use code Impact to get your first month free. That's B E V E L dot health slash impact. Thanks for sticking around. Let's get right back into the action.

B (15:31)

It seems like on the surface level this is, you know, ICE is a gangster killing civilians and they're unmasked men terrorizing communities. But do you think that this is deeper? Like is this the. Our modern day civil war? Is there something you know, is it an insurrection? What's kind of your general read on the. The totality of what's going on not just in Minnesota, but in America, period.

A (15:51)

We are a strange species and once people understand that we are evolutionarily shaped to be a social creature and that I believe the way that you achieve balance in a social animal is you have to have different roles and different people keep things in check. So everything from chronotype, why some people want to stay up late, why other people get up early. Well, if you put us all together as a village, the late night people stay up for ages and then the morning people wake up really early and you've more or less got 24 hour coverage. When you think about the left and the right divide, something that I've talked a lot about, you've got people that really believe in compassion, incredibly beneficial to social cohesion. And then you have people that believe in social responsibility. It's the way that you deal with the game theoretic of you'll get the bottom feeders that are going to do nothing and just reap the rewards of the compassion and so they won't contribute to the group. And so all of that stuff becomes incredibly important to getting human civilization to the point that it's at. But it has all of these weird ways that it manifests. I say all of that because I believe that for a very long I believe that humans are such that there are always elements that believe that the country, whatever country, is balanced in the wrong direction and they are trying to undermine that country at all times. This is what you see going on in China. So here you have the Reds win. And I liken Mamdani to China because he has the same impulses that this needs to be top down. We're going to take care of everybody. Don't worry if we have to, like, break some things, no big deal. It's how you get stability. I think that's inherent to humans. I don't think that's inherent to China or America. It's just humans have this bifurcation. And this is why you see these debates over what type of society we should have. So within America for a very long time, there have been people that want to see capitalism destroyed and modern technology has allowed for a level of cooperation that we've never seen before. And so I think that the slow march through the institutions, as they call it, which is a very Marxist idea, has been going on for decades and we're now seeing it manifest in the extreme in Minnesota. And I think that there are a lot of things tied from people that believe that borders should be open because this is stolen land and nobody's illegal. And so therefore it. Anybody should be welcomed into this country. They're wildly economically illiterate. They have no idea. But I'll even grant them that they really mean it, that they're really coming from a place of compassion. You've got that. Then you've got people that understand, oh, I can use that chaos to gain power. And I think that you're certainly seeing that in terms of who's more likely to vote. For me, let me get a bunch of people in here that are gonna vote. We're now seeing in the same way the Doge was like, hey, there's a lot of financial fraud. And people are like, no, there's not. And now we're seeing that there really is, like, an obscene amount of fraud. You're seeing the same things with voter registration. So, hey, there's voter fraud. No, there's not. Don't be ridiculous. Oh, we found one voter that's, like, comical. And now I forget which state it was, but there was a report that came out that there's a state that has 33% duplication rate. And so you're. I think you're going to see more and more things like that coming out, where we realize, yeah, like, if we know that game theory says any element of the design of a system that can be exploited, will be exploited. When you see people say it is now illegal to run an ICE operation around a polling booth, you have to ask, why would illegals be near a polling booth anyway? That should be, like, the dumbest place to go look for somebody illegal, because they would never be there because they can't vote. And so if we're trying to set up laws that say you can't enforce immigration around a polling place, you should raise your hand and say, no, no, no, that. That is clearly meant to abuse the system. That, to me is just like, if you said you cannot enforce child sex trafficking laws around schools, you'd be like, hold on. Of all the places that we should want that to be, that would be one of them. Of all the places everybody should just be like, yeah, you can't have illegal immigrants going into a polling place. We're all good with that. Because it shouldn't be happening. We don't think it is happening. And so if they. But, you know, they want to waste their dollars and put them there, cool, no problem. But that's not what you're seeing. You're seeing them specifically say, you can't run ICE enforcement around these polls, and they're trying to get that passed through the legislature. So it's like, I have a feeling you're going to see that what's really going on underneath is a coordinated effort of a populist left and a populist right, both trying to fight for permanent power. They both want to be in power forever. And so the very thing that we have to watch out for are the techniques that the left and the right, they will be different techniques, same goal. The techniques that they're each going to be using to try and remain in power forever. And so I will ask the eternal question once again, do you prefer your fascism in a left flavor or a right flavor? Because right now, in a moment of populism, clearly that's what you're getting. That's what rises to the top. So I look at this and see basically two elements of fascism clashing, and it's horrific and trying to reach into the soul of America to say, okay, how do we begin to back out of this? It's people that have to be aware that the human mind is governed by something like the laws of physics. And that's why over historical time periods, we are so predictable. And if those things are predictable, then there are actions that we can take to unwind that. So the shock of all shocks of aerodynamics Is that if you want to take off with an airplane, you don't fly with the wind, you fly in to the wind. And that's the very thing that allows you, through aerodynamics, to jump up into the sky. And so we have to find a way to recognize, okay, there are ways to calm this all down. They are going to be largely economic, but at this point, things are from a psychological perspective. The two sides are racing away from each other so rapidly that we have to get people to start running a thought experiment basically, of where does this lead? And if people want a civil war and they believe in that, then we have to understand that, okay, From a first principles perspective, if people believe this ends in civil war and that's what they want, and it won't be a north, south divide, I don't understand people who are like, oh, how would that even play out? It will play out. Literally what you're witnessing now is if civil war is a spectrum, you're already on the path. So it will look like this. It will be violence encouraged by the local state government to fight for the left or the right. And so right states will do right things and left states will do left things. And whoever's in power, they're going to fight against it. And when it's your side, it just feels just. When it's not your side, then it feels like people trying to decohere the country. But it's really the same phenomenon. And so people have to go, okay, are we at that point where now I'm prepared to use violence? Because be very clear, if these things continue to ratchet up regardless of the state, the federal government has to act. And if a state tries to secede from the union, I don't think that will be met peacefully. That will be met with violence.

B (24:06)

That'll be suicidal, though.

A (24:08)

So what is that Certainly hasn't stopped us historically, and I don't see anything in the human character that would stop us.

B (24:14)

I think historically we at least had more economic bandwidth to do that. I think any state other than California would do that, but I wouldn't even put it on California because they rely on federal funds for the budget shortfalls that they do have. So, so let me. I think seceding is. Is taught, but go ahead, let me.

A (24:30)

Run a scenario for you. Forget seceding from the nation. Take Minnesota. Minnesota right now, I promise you, in private conversations, it goes something like this. Immigration has become a burden on Trump. Used to be a signature policy, not anymore, it's now a liability. Keep this up. We have to make sure that he loses the midterms. Once he loses the midterms, we impeach him and then we arrest him. We arrest him, we arrest JD Vance, we arrest Cash Patel, Pam Bondi, and we're going to put them in prison. Then we're going to regain power and we are going to do. They won't call it an inquisition, but we're going to do an inquisition and we are going to arrest and jail everybody that we feel was creating this problem. And so it will be a, call it soft power couple where it's just blue states coordinating with blue states to resist all what they view as a red federal government doing these things. And then when it flips, it will be the opposite. And then it will be red states doing things to stymie blue leadership. And even just look at the way that Trump is responding. I don't. The Supreme Court will almost certainly strike this down, but he's going to do something like I think he already said as of February 1st, no dollars go to. I don't remember if it's like they won't cooperate with ice. It's something like that. That's close enough. It's directionally correct, even if it just serves for the thought experiment. But if he starts doing that, cutting.

B (26:15)

Off funds to blue states.

A (26:16)

Correct. You're, you're already in economic warfare. And so now if you're a blue state and you can't balance your budget because there's no federal dollars coming, what do you do? You escalate. You don't just go, okay, so now it becomes, what does that escalation look like? Is it all underground? Is it above ground? That I don't know. And time will tell how this plays out. But the goal will be just like with Israel, Palestine, the goal on the Palestinian side was make Israel look as bad as humanly possible in the eyes of the world. And they've really flipped the way that people look at Israel. Israel went from historical home of victims to, no, no, no. They're just a bunch of evil victimizers. So, I mean, just an absolutely incredible global mindset shift that they were able to pull off. And so you're going to see that kind of battle. And then at the federal level, we're now, as far as I can tell, I don't see anything that stops us. We're on this escalatory path of if Trump doesn't start arresting people, which he's getting harangued daily for by a lot.

B (27:30)

Of people, to arrest people.

A (27:32)

Yes, 100% people want to see Obama purple act. People want to see Clinton perp walked. People want to see, God knows, James Comer. I forget some of the names but like you guys have all heard them. Like they want to see all those guys locked up. And if Trump doesn't do it, then the next administration will. But if I'm right, that meaning the, if the Democrats take power, they will, if I'm right, that this is two sides trying to create a we're permanent, like Republicans are in power for the next 30 years. Uh, that's how this is going to play out. You have to punish the other side. And so we went from, remember we went from in the 70s economic woes. So of course everything is popping off and you have a president who gets caught being openly corrupt and he resigns, man, like he's in office, he resigns. This is Nixon. And do they prosecute him? No. Why don't they prosecute him? Because they say it's not good for America. We need to be looking forward, not behind. And America dusts itself off, regroups. The 80s are a boom. You're not going to get that this time because we're in a totally different place. Both from the long march through the institutions to radicalize people and bend them towards left leaning, Marxist style causes has really worked. And you now have a socialist mayor of the economic capital of the world. I mean, just like let that one sink in for a minute. So all of that is playing out. The attitude is being exacerbated because on the right you have these draconian immigration enforcement policies that will just give any sort of independent person watching. This is like, this is horrible. And so now it's like, yeah, you become very easy to paint as the villain. And then that gives a side that wants to see you locked away the ammunition to say we're really coming for you. Which then makes this existential on your side. So now what are you willing to do to make sure that you maintain power? So I don't think this is a, oh well, we're just gonna go in and say peace out. We're no longer part of America in the way that Alberta seems to be doing with Canada. But I do think it's, we're going to do our part to make sure that we get to an all blue House, Senate, Supreme Court, executive branch and then we're going to run our game. And so if people think that Trump is as bad as it gets, they need to understand Trump is a step on the spectrum to total war between the left and the right.

B (30:41)

You put out a lot of things there. So I kind of want, like, lay it down and map it out. So right now, ICE is happening in Minnesota, but it's happening across the country. There's ICE raids in every, mostly every state. Earlier this year, we talked about when Trump brought ICE to California, they did that whole military exhibition through Leimert park with the tanks and all that other stuff kind of driving through that happened. And then there was pushback, there were protests. They then withdrew. What do you think is making them double down in Minnesota?

A (31:16)

So if you look at Minnesota, there is. There is a question that needs to be asked. I want to be very clear. I don't have any more information than anybody else. I'm watching the same news segments that other people are watching. But there. There are two things to note in Minneapolis. One is the just, systemic refusal of the governor and the mayor to cooperate with ice. So they are making it as hard as possible, including asking people to put their bodies on the line, to literally go out and protest. Now, they say peacefully. I want to be very clear. They're not telling people to rock up with their guns, but they are telling people to keep making the noise, keep going out there, keep doing what you're doing. Okay? So that gives people a permission structure. They're calling off the police. Obviously, the police are not assisting ICE at all. And so now you have this antagonistic relationship between the government, local government and state government, and the federal government. So that's huge. And so they are persistently escalatory now, I think that Karen Bass was also on that spectrum. So that isn't the whole of this. The other is the. This didn't turn deadly until the fraud was uncovered. Once the fraud was uncovered, then it started really to escalate. And so I don't think you can remove from the table the fact that you've got all of this fraud that is looming in the background. You have a governor who, when the fraud came out, stepped back and said, I'm not going to run for reelection. And so it is unknown exactly what that number ends up being. But you obviously have a permission structure for some absolutely insane things going on in Minnesota, full stop without this. Now, when I look at California, is it possible that California is just so much bigger, so much more diverse, so many different interest groups, that it's just harder to get momentum going here? Maybe. I don't know. We'll see. I think there's also something to. In Los Angeles or in California, this is hypothesis. Hypothesis. But in California, some of the strongest pushback against illegal immigration comes from Mexican immigrants. And so you've got Mexican immigrants that are like, bro, I did this the hard way. I did this the right way. I got here legally. I've done the thing. I've worked my ass off. I've been a part of the fabric of this city and this country for, you know, in some cases, decades. It's like, I've raised my kids here. I wanted a better life for them. I wanted them to be American. So there's less, like, momentum that you're able to get by whipping them up into a frenzy in the way that you can. The Somali population, who's newer here, who, if is true, is coordinated and acting like a block, there's far fewer of them. There was an estimate that I saw that there's only 130,000 illegal immigrants in Minnesota compared to millions in California. So it, again, hypothesis, easier to organize, easier to get them to move as one unit. More clear leadership hypothesis. Allegedly. No idea if this is true, but Ilhan Omar, as the sort of, like, top person that's able to coordinate the.

B (34:35)

Community, I'm trying to coordinate because I feel like there's a lot of things there. So are you saying that it's happening in Minnesota because the Somalis are organizing the protest, or.

A (34:44)

I don't. I don't believe that they are organizing the protests. I think that's down to the community organizers.

B (34:50)

You're just saying they, as a voting.

A (34:52)

Block, they move as a block. So you've got a group of people who are like, okay, we need to act in a coordinated fashion. Then you get community organizers, members of the government, whatever, coming to them and saying, okay, cool, here's the playbook. Like in the signal chats, there is.

B (35:08)

G, can we just close it and restart?

A (35:09)

There's at least one member of the Waltz administration that is a part of these community organization groups that are pushing back against ice. So does that mean that Tim Walls is involved? No, it does not. But does it mean that there are members of the government that are involved? Yes, it does. So now, again, I don't have any information that other people don't have. So I want to be very clear about the level of speculation here. People need to be very careful. But that is one potential reason why this is happening in Minnesota in a way that it's not happening elsewhere. And so the question becomes, if there is a similar level of systemic fraud happening in California, will it suddenly create the same kind of pushback as that begins to become uncovered? Or does California just have too many different constituencies pulling in too many different directions, and it's harder to get something coordinated. I don't know. So we'll see how that plays out. But that level of coordination seems to. It makes sense. It has internal logic. Whether it ends up being correct or not, we will find out in the fullness of time. But it means something that you have 50 states that have immigration enforcement happening in them. You have states that have way more like orders of magnitude. In fact, can you pull up the There's a heat map of the US that shows that Minnesota's like in the middle in terms of how much immigration enforcement has been being done there. And it is nonetheless got a level of pushback and violence that is orders of magnitude larger than other places. So option number one, ICE is being unusually draconian in Minnesota because Trump hates walls and wants to punish him. It's possible. Okay. I won't deny that that could be what's going on. The other interpretation is that there's deeper coordination to push back against federal law enforcement coming from Minnesota, potentially related to the fraud, potentially related to the Somali group being more united and more willing to act as one cohesive block. Taking a short break, but there's more impact theory after Stay tuned. Let's talk about what happens when life gets busy. Your schedule fills up, deadlines pile on, meetings run back to back, and the first thing that falls apart is taking care of yourself. You skip meals because there's no time. You grab whatever's fastest. But running on inconsistent nutrition means inconsistent energy when you need it most. That's where Huell comes in, with two products designed to keep you fueled when you're too busy to think about it. There's Huell Black Edition, ready to drink. It's a complete meal in a bottle. 35 grams of protein, 27 vitamins and minerals, 0 prep, 0 cleanup. And there's Huel Daily Greens, 42 vitamins and nutrients, 4 grams of fiber. Try it in apple, peach or blueberry flavors. Get 15% off your first order for new customers with code impact@huell.com impact minimum $75 purchase. That's huell.com impact and use code Impact. I want to talk about energy, one of the most important things in your life. Most high achievers run on caffeine and willpower until their body forces them to stop. But that is not a strategy. It's just a countdown to being tired all the time. Real energy comes from cellular health, and that's exactly what what Nandica is built to deliver. This isn't another stimulant disguised as wellness peaks. Nandica is a ceremonial cacao nootropic built with ingredients that actually fortify your cells. Ceremonial grade cacao fermented pu erh tea from 250-year-old trees. I'd heard so much about it, I tried it myself. It is fantastic. Full spectrum reishi, including spore powder. Every ingredient is selected for maximum bioavailability and cellular impact. The result is calm, sustained energy without the jitters or crash. Set your longevity goals in motion. Get 20% off@peaklife.com impact that's P I Q U E life.com impact Close your eyes, exhale.

B (39:42)

Feel your body relax and let go of whatever you're carrying today.

A (39:48)

Well, I'm letting go of the worry that I wouldn't get my new contacts in time for this class. I got them delivered free from 1-800-contacts.

B (39:54)

Oh my gosh, they're so fast. And breathe. Oh, sorry.

A (39:58)

I almost couldn't breathe when I saw the discount they gave me on my first order. Oh, sorry.

B (40:03)

Namaste.

A (40:05)

Visit 1-800-contacts.com today to save on your first order. 1-800-contacts. Thanks for staying tuned. Now let's get back to it.

B (40:15)

I just feel like we're having the accountability on the wrong side of the conversation. I think, yes, resisting is bad. But before. Let me finish my point. Let me just finish my point. Landon Flame, then you can jump in. I think I have a buddy in Atlanta who just became a beat cop. He got his level of approved from HR last week. He's not going to be on the street writing tickets until August. Writing tickets, traffic tickets till August. ICE agents get 12 days of training and a pat on the back of the Capri Sun. And then now we're saying that the victim should have had his composure, should have been kept up, when the reason that the victim was even involved in the first place is because they pushed the woman and pepper sprayed her. So he jumped in the middle to kind of help the women. Then they have him back. He's on all fours. They're on his back. And you're saying that he's resisting? If I don't know, like, we got a UFC fighter in the room. I don't know how much more tame you can be in that position. So again, the guy who we're saying he should have done, he should have done. It doesn't matter. His accountability is he's dead. So that's what happened. But I just want to say in the law of court, in the land of the free, in the home of the brave, in the justice system that we all hang our hat on, that we're not like all these other third world countries, we're civilized, we're a progressive organization because we have justice, we have courts, we have law and we have order. He didn't get his day in court. He didn't get his day in front of the judge. He didn't get his side of the story. We have a bunch of people looking at videos from different angles saying he had a gun. He didn't have a gun, it was his phone, he shot a gun, there was a misfire. All these other things that are happening, it doesn't matter what you want to say about him, because he's dead. So whatever, whether he did it right or wrong, he's dead. It doesn't matter now. The ICE agents just killed somebody a couple of weeks ago. Where was the accountability? Where was happening? Nothing. You can act with impunity. Don't worry about it. Just do your own thing. So now they killed somebody else. And what's going to happen after this one? It's not. It's cool. You're right, they're wrong. Go get the illegals. Cool. So then this is going to happen again? So we can spend 20 minutes talking about, he should have did this. He should have been in all fours. He should have been in a fetal position. It doesn't matter, he's dead. Let's talk about the ICE agent that killed him, and let's talk about the other ICE agent that killed that other person. And let's talk about how these things are now starting to be tied up together. You're a businessman, you're an entrepreneur. Everybody knows about the 8020 rule. You're spending 20% of your time, you're spending 80% of your time trying to go after 20% of the illegals. There's a million illegals in California. There's a million legals in Texas. If Minnesota is not even cooperating, withdraw from Minnesota just like you withdrew from la. Sue them, Law order them, say you're impeding progress, put Governor Walls in jail. Do these things that the legal process is for. The country was founded on a bunch of lawyers. The Constitution, the Declaration of Independence is a bunch of people arguing in the courtroom. That's how these documents got formed. So Trump wants to call, like lawfare and all these other things to throw the people that don't vote for him in jail, but when it comes to what he actually should be, like, suing for he should be suing Tim Walsh. Tim Walsh should be in front of Senate, and they already did that. So, okay, get Tim Waltz in front of Senate. Have him accountable. Are you going to help him? No, you're not. Okay, now you're held in contempt of court. Now we could throw you out. I did the same thing that we want because it's all about end goals. The end goals that get illegals, Right? So you can get the illegals two weeks from now after you done subpoenaed all these people. You get the illegals two weeks from now when you go and actually cooperate with the jails. They're not even in the jails yet. They're started in the streets. I thought we were going after the bad and the criminals. Why are we in the streets and not in the jails? You get what I'm saying? So, again, I feel like we spent a lot of time with the guy and what he could have done and should have done and caught, gun or not gun and all that. He's dead. It doesn't matter what he should have, would have done, because he can't undo that. Now let's talk about the Ice Ages and what they can do better going forward. Let's talk about this administration and how they can execute their goals going forward without another loss of an American citizen.

A (43:46)

Okay, so that feels like an argument for somebody other than me, because the.

B (43:51)

Reason I jumped in on that, because you were saying he, he shouldn't have been resisting, he shouldn't have been all these things.

A (43:55)

Here's how I mentally map you, and if you think I'm incorrect, let me know. It doesn't matter how much I say about the wrongness of what Trump is doing, which I covered extensively today. The wrongness of the guy shooting, which I've covered extensively today. The second I say these guys really need to stop resisting, no matter how unjust the police coming after them is they need to stop resisting. The second I mention that, you're gonna have a problem with that, which is fine.

B (44:25)

It's not that that's what I'm gonna have a problem with. It's just in the totality of things.

A (44:29)

It's false equivalencies, but I'm not making them equivalent. So I'm saying, hey, if you. You right now, you have a government that's acting tyrannically. They should stop immediately in no uncertain terms. This is a problem. Trump is ratcheting this up. He's marching us towards civil war. My whole opening thing was, you cannot keep using the Hammer, he's got to stop now. I'm saying as a psa, for the love of God, if you find yourself in this situation where you were trying to peacefully protest, you, you have to stop resisting. And if you don't now, you're going to find yourself increasing the likelihood you get shot. You don't drop it to zero because these guys are acting tyrannically. So I'm just saying I, that's where I do not understand how people are mapping the situation as if we don't have people who are showing up two like they are so antagonistic towards ice. And that is coming out in these moments of confrontation where they try to run, they try to resist arrest. And it is, it's just increasing, increasing, increasing. There is a reason that the ultra successful movements, what Gandhi did in India, what the black community did in the civil rights movement was always like, you've got to be beyond reproach, peaceful. And that's not the message now. The message now is one of resistance. The message now is protest peacefully but have your gun on you. Organize, try to impede. Like there's, there is another layer of that. And I'm saying that layer. I'll just speak at the individual level. Dear person who is trying to make your voice heard in America, you have every right to say the government's become tyrannical and I'm going to pull my gun out. But just know that when you stand for that, that it could mean prison forever. It could mean you get shot dead. And so it better be that place for you where you really believe this is the right play if you don't. And he didn't take out his gun, he did not reach for in any way, shape or form. I think he's beyond reproach in that way. From where I'm at, you had a guy who was in, in that moment was 100% peaceful until they took him to the ground. And then he's resisting and ratcheting things up, up, up, up, up. So it doesn't even necessarily mean that it would play out any differently. But he's in a much better position if he's not fighting back. Pulling, resisting, making him yank harder, trying to shove him down, like that's where all of this stuff goes crazy. And if I were saying, dude, the government's playing this perfectly, this guy's the problem, I would get why you're saying what you're saying and I'm not saying that.

B (47:24)

Well, in lighter news, while America's on fire, China got some problems too. Yeah, let's go, China. Welcome to the club. So there's a bunch of different, like, takes coming in on this level. Set us with the China stuff, because I'm not going to lie, I shouldn't have been as excited as I was to hear this news, but I'm like, oh, is this drama? Because there was whispers a couple months ago, we talked about it briefly on the show. It was unconfirmed, all these other things. And now we're starting to get more analysis and that actual, like, shots were fired and stuff like that happened over this weekend. So.

A (47:54)

All right, everybody. Rumors are falling that Xi Jinping's most recent purge of the military has resulted in a failed coup attempt. Guns being shot the whole night. Now those are rumors. Reputable outlets like Reuters, Bloomberg, cnn, the Wall Street Journal are all reporting on a major military purge initiated by Xi Jinping, including investigations into top generals Zhang Yaojia, who's the vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, and Liu Zhenli for serious violations such as corruption, undermining party authority over the military, and in Zhang's case, allegations of leaking nuclear secret service to the U.S. now, I want to be very clear. These are all rumors. Nobody knows what's happening right now. This is a big question mark. Some reports are like, ah, it's no big deal. This is just Xi doing more purging. Other people are like, whoa. They've arrested thousands of people, including these generals, including their families. So it's unclear at this time what is actually real, but these reports frame it as part of Xi's ongoing efforts to consolidate control and root out disloyalty in the People's Liberation Army. Now, for anybody keeping score in China, you will know that you had Mao, a horrible, destructive, evil figure that killed tens of millions of his own people would make light of it. I think he killed his son and his wife or sent them to die is probably a more accurate version of this. Like, this is just a very, very bad dude. And then you had Deng Xiaoping, who is the like. When you really think about China's miracle, about using the free markets to pull so many people out of poverty, it was Deng Xiaoping. Now you've got Xi Jinping, who is more Maoist in his tendencies. So he's trying to consolidate power, he's violating a lot of the norms that Deng Xiaoping had put in place, and he's going back to more of an iron fisted rule in the way that Maoists Mao did. So who knows where this is going to go. But as new details emerge from Official Chinese statements or even just stuff corroborated by multiple high credibility sources. We'll keep you guys updated. Things could shift, but right now the violent coup narrative is being amplified all over social media. But I would read that as speculation rather than actual journalism. But they're. What'd you say, the keys jingling? Somebody says I'm about keys jingling. It's like, yeah, these are the. Was it LeBron?

B (50:27)

LeBron. The.

A (50:28)

You've got the noises coming out that tend to be a little bit early, and then call it two months from now, six months from now, something like that, then we'll start to see like the official impacts of whatever's happening. However, if he's Mao in nature, he's going to be tough, man. He's going to be tough. And anybody that thinks Xi Jinping is not smart to do what he did to go from China was moving in the opposite direction. They were becoming, not democratic, but they were becoming more of a party that didn't have emperor. And he managed to reconsolidate power, make himself emperor for life. Doesn't call himself emperor, but he's an emperor. So very impressive guy, very politically astute, very good at consolidating power and very willing to kill, disappearance, imprison his enemies. And so when you have somebody that's prepared to do that, don't expect that to turn over quickly. So I would say you have a far bigger chance of something happening in Iran that's in America's interest than you have something happening in China that's in America's interest. So I would not hold your breath for that one.

B (51:41)

So on paper, you know, I'm making jokes about celebrating and stuff like that, but this, does this increase their paranoia? And now he turns into like a crazy dictator.

A (51:50)

Do you think he's already in crazy dictator territory? He's been purging for years. And when you read purges, imprison, kill, concentration camp, like it's, this is not like, Bob, you're fired. This is not a lot of Bob's in China. But somehow that felt safer. You it is a violent, fear inducing consolidation of power that will put him in a position where he'll be isolated inside of his own party where he won't know where the attacks are going to come from. And so like Putin, he has to be incredibly paranoid. He runs the risk of not getting real information because people are terrified to tell him the truth. Because you see, oh, the people that speak truth, often those messengers are killed, not literally, but, you know, they're Disappeared, not listened to, booted out of the ccp, that kind of thing. So for your livelihood, it's just better to go along and get along. And so you'll occasionally get people like, oh, God, who was the guy in Russia that had like a splinter military force and they, like, marched almost all the way to Moscow. We don't even remember his name. They blew him up in an airplane. It was like, oh, my God, please, somebody look this up. I cannot chat. You must remember his name. What was his name, for the love of God? And he was like, he marched on Moscow with his fraction of the. The military. Prigozhin. Was it progression? I think it was, yeah. So, thank you, Chat. So you end up getting guys in the military that will go against you. But I still can't believe that that. Did he really think that Putin wasn't going to get him? But he backs down, they negotiate, shake hands, all's, all's well, all's forgiven, no worries. And like six weeks later, he's on an airplane that blows up midair. Who could have guessed? Who could have guessed?

B (53:49)

How convenient.

A (53:50)

So, yeah, it's wild.

B (53:52)

There are some rumors that Zhang, who led the coup, was a government asset from the CIA and he was leaking nuclear secrets to the us. So to your point earlier about foreign agents doing things on local soil, it could be that is what started the coup in the back.

A (54:08)

Yeah. So remember, we're in an information warfare landscape. The odds of that being true feel low. But that's just a feeling. Feelings don't matter at all. So we'll see what ends up playing out over time. But if the US really has assets that high up in the Chinese military, because it's my understanding that that general in question, Zhang, was like, really close. I've heard reports that they were like childhood friends. I cannot verify. I don't know that that's true, but that people are saying that they were very, very close. So for that guy to be the guy that's betraying him. Again, speculation, early conjecture. So I would not expect any sort of immediate crumbling in China. But this does signal that there might be far more tension within China than we think. And if there really is this kind of dissent in the military, you can imagine them making a move on Taiwan in 2027. Goes down in likelihood because you doing air, land, sea invasions when you don't know if you can trust your general, that becomes a much bigger question mark. Now, many people have been speculating that China is going to use an administrative takeover of Taiwan. So we'll see they're trying to get their candidates into office and hey, that sounds familiar. So you. It doesn't necessarily have to be a military invasion for them to still come in and take over. So we'll see what happens there. But I would say from a poly market standpoint, I would be surprised if the odds of a 2027 invasion didn't just go down on this news. So we'll see. I have a checkpoint.

B (55:39)

I mean, you know, that's bright side. Glass half full staying in international politics. We're getting mighty close to Iran and it seems like we're in striking distance now.

A (55:49)

Yeah, I mean, no, seems like this one's crazy. So the question all of us should be asking is, is a major military operation about to go down in Iran? That is truly the right question. That should be on everybody's lips as the USS Abraham Lincoln just arrived within striking distance of Iran. And the US Media is using that phrase over and over and over. And so when you remember that basically everything is an asset ultimately of the government's propaganda war, they want Iran to recognize that they're within striking distance, which matters only if you're prepared to make a move. The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike group has moved like the whole shebang over into the region from the Asia Pacific. And it is in that fleet you've got three guided missile destroyers, the USS Frank E. Peterson Jr. USS Spruance, and USS Michael Murphy. The fleet has squadrons of F35C Lightning IIs and FA18EF Super Hornets. And just to keep things extra spicy, the US has also deployed F15E Strike Eagles to Jordan and B52 bombers to Qatar. So they are ready at all angles. Now, if you guys are going, why exactly are we doing this? The primary driver for the move is obviously in response to the massive wave of nationwide protests in Iran that began in late December of 25. Now, accurate numbers are exactly impossible to pin down, but Iranian security forces have engaged in a violent response against these protesters. You've got some people claiming that the death toll is over 40,000. That would be insane. And to give you a sense, in, in Gaza, it took, I think almost two years to hit that number. So the fact that people are so quiet about what's going on in Iran is pretty wild. International monitor and activist groups estimate the death toll has at a minimum exceeded 5,000 people and that tens of thousands of people have been detained. So President Trump has made it abundantly clear that mass executions would be a red line that would trigger massive US intervention. So when I look at this, I'm like, okay, it's a little bit sad that the time it takes to move the assets into the region are what they are, because the resistance seems to mostly die down, and not necessarily for good reasons, probably because they were cracked down on ruthlessly. But nonetheless, the atmosphere is arguably declining in its urgency. And so having the group out in the region, I'm guessing, is more just from a deterrence perspective. So even though things are more volatile than they've been Since June of 2025 strikes, when we did the strikes on the nuclear facilities, it seems like the odds of the US Actually doing something unless Iran makes some sort of horrific move first are very, very low. Currently, the US Posture is officially being described just as deterrence. So the goal here is to prevent the further violence, not to do some sort of preemptive strike. Now, there has been an arrival of a Thaad missile defense battery in Israel, and the carrier's group position is within striking distances we talked about earlier. So that means that maybe the Trump administration is trying to do a transition from hey, bro, we're just watching to being ready to actively hammer them. But that seems unlikely if one of Trump's red lines isn't crossed. But we'll see the instability there continues, certainly at a geopolitical level, even if not on the streets of Tehran itself. Wild times.

B (59:37)

You think they're going to do like a Maduro style, like black bagging of like the regime?

A (59:43)

Definitely not. So do I think they want to see it fall? Yes. Do I think that the US wants to try to run the government there the way that they do in Venezuela? No. I would be very surprised. There's too much connective tissue between other powerful countries that I don't think would smile upon that. If the supposedly the UAE and a couple other countries are going to supply air space to the US if they make a move, and that's a change in reported posture, Whether it's a change in behind the scenes posture, I don't know. But if a bunch of countries were like, yeah, would you just go like, take them out? Then the US would probably do it because they're so oil rich and we could strike such a blow to China, but without that, I can't imagine it. But if we could, because China, I think I forget what total percentage of Iran's oil goes to China, but it's meaningful. And so if you were able to take control of that, not only would Iran have to jump dance to your tune, but you would deal another economic blow to China. At a time where they've already got enough problems. So it's like, I get why the US Would have an itchy trigger finger on this one, but I just don't think it's. I think it's so high risk and so likely to be unpopular in the region. I doubt it's going to happen, but we'll see.

B (61:07)

I mean, to your point, we cut off their oil supply with Venezuela, Russia there being China. Yeah, yeah, they're being China. Yeah. Iran is another one. If we did make top of that regime there, that would be two of their significance. I would say more than half. And then Russia will be kind of their sole provider. And Russia last weekend just had to sell some gold reserves in order to keep funding the war. So they're kind of on their back foot, too. This could be the. I don't want to say the death punch, but it could be something that can at least cripple China for the next couple years if we were this aggressive. I think there's at least one general in Trump's ear whispering that, yeah, I.

A (61:40)

Think that they're probably stronger than we give them credit for, because what you would be doing, you wouldn't deal like some sort of, like, gut punch that is likely to take out China. You just make energy costs a little bit higher. But they're. Look, energy is at the foundation of everything, but nobody on planet Earth is doing a better job of spinning up new power than China. So China's way too smart, way too disciplined. That the thing that's going to. If something were to really damage them, it would be that the continued global pressure on China, as the US Moves away from them, begins to do things at home. As the US Pressures other people, like Canada not to build direct relationships with China. That there you see like a just slow erosion of Xi's power. And then somebody comes into China that is more. I mean, look, you could get somebody who's 10 times worse. Let's be very clear about that. That's why this is such a dangerous game to play. Regime change. But if you got somebody that was more D. Xiao Ping in temperament, where it's like, yes, we'll shoot a bunch of people in Tiananmen Square, I think that was. Dang. Don't home into that, though. But at the same time, we also understand the free market is really the godsend. And so it'll be interesting to see how that plays out. But I'm not expecting. Just as I think for all of the turmoil happening in America, there's. I don't think anything acute is going to break America in the next 18 months. My time horizon is more like 10 years. Over 10 years, as you race towards bankruptcy, you, the pockets of violence grow into something else unless we can grow out of it. So we'll see. And I would put China in the same basket. They've got plenty of time to correct course, figure things out. At least that's my hope. I may be being overly optimistic both for America and China, but that my gut instinct is that, all right, I.

B (63:39)

Know we got some super chats. We're going to hit those. But first, this story I know is going to take a while because you're going to have to break it down for us. But I want to cover the Japanese yen trade because there's a lot of different things on the table. I see US is now buying. Apparently he's going to buy the yen and take the dollar. Besson saying, that's a good move. I don't know if this is the same thing we did with Argentina, that we're just temporarily backing them. So kind of give us the lay of the land when it comes to this Japanese yen trade and how America's getting involved.

A (64:05)

Okay, this one has a lot. I'll kind of speed run it and then depending on community questions, we can drill down on something. Okay, so Besson is signaled. Signaled is the important word here. This is always how the financial system works. They signal things so that the market can react, sort of react in a measured way first, but they can see, like, how things are playing, and then they can, like, back off or push forward. It's utterly fascinating, but nonetheless, Besson has signaled that he's willing, get ready for this, to devalue the dollar as a weapon in the global trade war. We will almost certainly want to talk more about that. If this is true. This would allow the US to use the dollar's value to help allies and hurt enemies. So, like, we could batter China, we could help Japan. In that vein, reports have been flying that the Federal Reserve conducted what's known as a rate check on Japanese yen on Friday. Again, this is all about signaling. Historically, when this kind of rate check has been done, it's been a precursor to direct currency intervention on behalf of the US to help Japan halt the yen's rapid depreciation. I don't think people understand because Japan is, like, relatively small, but their economy is amazing, sort of in the way that it's plugged into the US Economy for sure, and by proxy, the global economy. So it's very Important, even if they've been in stagflation for like 40 years, which is crazy. Apparently Besant has 160 yen per dollar threshold that he says when we hit that, it's time to take action. I think they were like 158 or something. Very, very close. Following the rate check, the yen surged roughly 3% over two trading sessions. And by this morning, today, Monday, the currency was back to about 153.81 yen. And that's down from a Friday high. Okay, this is the number 159.20. So Woo got close to that 160. The question is, what exactly is Besant trying to accomplish with this? He's indicated that he's concerned that the sell off in Japanese government bonds, which I'll sometimes read is JGBs, which is normally how people refer to it, but that just means Japanese government bonds was going to spill over into US treasury market, driving up American borrowing costs. When Japanese government bond yields spike like they did just recently, hitting a 27 year high, by the way, following Japanese Prime Minister Takeichi's tax cut proposals, it creates a mechanistic vacuum that sucks liquidity out of the US bond market. Now, there are likely three things that Besson is worried about right now. First, Japan is the single largest foreign holder of U.S. debt, owning roughly $1.1 trillion in Treasuries. For years, JGB yields were near zero. So Japanese pension funds and insurers, they had to buy US Treasuries to get any return to make good on their promises to the people that hold their products. But if JGB yields rise towards the 3 and 4% that we see them moving towards now while the yen is strengthening, those Japanese investors no longer need the hassle of US assets. So they would just repatriate their cash by selling U.S. treasuries and buying the Japanese government bonds. The massive selling of U.S. bonds would drive U.S. interest rates up, making mortgages and car loans and things like that more expensive for Americans. Okay, the second thing that Besson is most likely worried about, something we've talked about here before, the yen carry trade, that unwinding would be a problem. So this is the borrow cheap, invest high strategy that we've talked about. So the trade goes like this. Borrow yen at say 0.5% interest, sell it for dollars, and buy US tech stocks or treasuries yielding 4.5%. It's magic money. It is an infinite money glitch, of course, until it's not now the crisis. If the yen suddenly gains value or the Japanese government bond yields rise. The cost of that cheap borrowed yen skyrockets. Investors are then forced to fire sale the things that they've bought with that borrowed money. So they'd have to dump their US assets effectively all at once to pay back their yen before they're wiped out by the rising interest costs. This, by the way, is the same reason that you know that America, the Fed is going to lower rates because you see that cliff of debt coming. You're like, you have to do something. In this case you sell off your US assets and pay down your loans. And in the US case, you devalue the dollar. So, all right, the third thing that is probably worried about is the volatility spillover. So markets do not exist in silos all around the world. Understanding how interconnected we are right now is very important. And when the world's third largest bond market, which is the Japanese government bonds, because of that low interest rates, when that market has a heart attack, it triggers automated selling in risk parity funds, multi billion dollar funds that automatically sell assets when volatility spikes. Analysts at Citigroup recently warned that Japanese government bond volatility could force funds to dump up to $130 billion in U.S. bonds purely to manage their risk profile. So that' regardless of how healthy the US economy looks, things could be fine on our side, but they have covenants that they have to meet around risk and so it would force them to sell things off. Now, by signaling Fed support for the yen, Besson is essentially trying to lower the temperature of like all this instability. If the yen stabilizes, the fire sale stops. So he's effectively protecting the US treasury market from being the liquidity atm, right? So the yen is declining in value, everybody's panic selling. And now you, because you have to raise rates to stabilize everything and now you are selling off in the US to get the money that you need and that ends up hurting the US economy. So the last time the US and Japan engaged in a major coordinated intervention to support the yen was June of 1998 during the Asian financial crisis. In that instance, the joint effort was designed to prevent a regional devaluation war and was restore stability to global markets after the yen hit 147. So we're higher than that now.

B (70:30)

When I hear this, my initial thought is like, okay, well if they're holding $1.1 trillion in debt and you have to sell it, that's good for us because we'll get that money and we can pay down our Debt or like they're selling the notes. So where does that money get sold to? Back to us. Right? Do I have this wrong?

A (70:45)

You do. So here's where. Okay, can I do a quick psa? This is so important. If, by the way, if you're thinking about starting a business, join Impact Theory University. I teach this idea over and over and over and over. The reason you can ask me any question about your business and I can give you an answer. I don't need a gazillion years of context is because if you understand the mechanisms, then you understand cause and effect. Once you understand cause and effect, industry doesn't matter anymore. So the big thing that's going on here is when you understand the mechanisms of how this kind of stuff works, then you. It's like, oh, shit, okay, I get it. So, for instance, when people are selling things off, then there is a. So bonds are sold on the private market as well as initial auctions. So they'll do an initial auction to get the thing into the system. Hugely important how that goes, what price willing people are willing to pay, how much of it goes before they have to raise rates. All this stuff. Very, very important. But when people talk about the bond market, what they're really talking about are people selling things that they already own constantly, all the time. And so as people gain faith, lose faith, they buy and sell at different prices. And the fixed return of a bond is determined at the time of issuance. However, when you sell it, if you sell it at a lower rate, you know what it pays out at. So if I buy it at a lower, like, cost, and I know it pays out at that much, then we would say the yields have gone up. If everybody thinks that it's going to be stronger, then it's like you can drive the cost up. And now people are like, okay, I feel really good. This is stable, but my yields are going to be smaller. So when yields are going up, it's actually a sign of a problem. It's people saying, oh, I, I don't have faith that this is going to work. So I'm going to lower the price, give you a way bigger potential return. So you'll be the sucker that gets drawn in by greed. You hold that for 10 years, we'll see what happens. So that those are. It's happening all the time. And that has an impact on, on the appetite for bonds. And if the appetite goes too low, then the treasury is going to step in and buy those things. Now, the treasury doesn't want to do that. But they know that they'll have to. So as the bond market starts getting crazy, that's bad news for them because they may have to print money and buy a ton of that stuff just to keep the economy going. And for the reasons we've talked about a trillion times in the show, printing money, bad news. So you don't want to see major sell offs. You want to see everybody have belief that the long tail bond rates, oh, it's going to be great. You want that rate low. And so people are like, yeah, the 10 year rate is low, great. That means that people believe it's nice and stable. You don't have to entice people to come in and buy it. And so as those rates climb, which is exactly what's happening in Japan, everyone starts to panic. Because if you want to borrow money, you know, to build something, you don't want to borrow it for 90 days, you want to borrow for 10 years. And so as those numbers go up now you're running into trouble. Now you're getting into the position where you're in a expensive debt position. And when debt is expensive, the economy cools down.

B (73:58)

Gotcha, Gotcha. Do you think this is something that now that because the number cooled down, this was just him signaling, kind of dipping his toe in the water to try to give people ease, or do you think this is an intervention that America would need to do.

A (74:14)

This to answer that question? It comes down to the fundamental, what do you think about 1913? Do you like there to be creative destruction or do you want there to be no creative destruction? It's a set of trade offs. So Scott Besant is a very clever man who has made billions of dollars off of understanding currency moves. And remember, he was the guy with George Soros that broke the British pound. It's wild to think that people can do that, but they did. And so he understands how this stuff works. He understands that if we stop the bleeding, we stabilize the global markets, but we also keep the zombie train running because it's people from the top saying, I'm going to devalue the dollar by making more of it.

B (75:03)

It.

A (75:04)

I'm going to punish anybody who saves money. I'm going to punish anybody that doesn't understand assets. I'm going to deepen the K shaped economy, I'm going to rev up populism, but there won't be a acute depression. And so if you're like, bro, I'll let you shove me to the bottom of the cave shaped economy all day, just don't Put me in a depression. Okay, great. You would rather that. And like, remember in the Depression, flour companies, like I bake bread with flour. Flour companies, their sacks were printed designs because people were so poor they would make clothes for themselves or for their kids out of the flour sacks. And instead of your kid running around in a burlap sack, they wanted him running around in a sack with flowers printed on it. So that's a depression. We've never seen anything like it. And we've never seen anything like it specifically because we steal from everybody that holds dollars. And we just say, yeah, we're going to kill you slowly, but you're never going to have to wear flour sacks. And if you would rather be in that position and say, I don't mind that the billionaires run away with all the money in the universe via assets, let's be very clear. I don't mind not being able to make ends meet. I just want to make sure that there's never an acute moment of despair like the 1929 crash that led into the Great Depression. That's a trade off. And so, yeah, depending on where you fall on that side determines whether you think this is a good move or a bad move.

B (76:41)

Do you. Which side do you fall?

A (76:44)

You have the system. So right now it's a good move. But you should be looking to get out of this system, get away from.

B (76:51)

Federal Reserve in general.

A (76:53)

Yeah, I mean, listen, here's probably where I'm gonna end up on all of this. And it's, oh, God, I hate that this is true. You know that meme that's like dumb guy says, midwit says something different. And then smart guy says the same thing as the, the dummy. Bitcoin is your life raft. Says the dummy. Midwit is like, bro, like, that's crazy. You shouldn't be forcing people into an alternative currency. And then smart guy goes, bitcoin's your life raft. It. And by bitcoin, I mean gold. Bitcoin, like things that are alternative assets. Yeah, they're not easy to inflate. I say not easy because gold does inflate every year. But it's not easy to inflate. It's decentralized. Gold is a decentralized reserve currency. Bitcoin, same thing. I want to save everybody, but time and time again, life teaches me it's not really possible between people not having the time or the inclination to think from first principles or they're too stupid. Either way, you end up in a system where no empire in history has ever Avoided printing money into oblivion. So we're not going to avoid it. So yeah, the only reality is I can make moves to protect myself and then yell into a microphone for anybody who will listen to go protect themselves. But that's it. I don't see any other strategy.

B (78:22)

I feel like if you were the Secretary of Treasury and like let's say you weren't politically affiliated, you were actually the Secretary of Treasury and your one job was to make America long term better.

A (78:32)

Yeah.

B (78:33)

I feel like you would probably go away from the Fed, I'm assuming.

A (78:38)

No, I do something totally different. You're making me think about something I haven't thought about. But what popped into my head is I would be running the strategy that they're sort of flirting with. But I don't talk much about where you're making sure that every American is invested in an intelligent way and you create a system where the smartest financial minds in the world desperately want to work for the government because they get rich. As Americans get rich and they, they don't get a management fee, those kids, you get money only if Americans are getting money. And if Americans get money, you get money and go get rich. And so if you could create. That's it, bro. We have financialized the world. We are about to financialize outer space. And so let those like America stopped manufacturing and started financializing. So put like if you're really trying to do this thing, it's like just make sure all Americans benefit from that financialization. So and they're not going to like be the big swing winners. You want an all weather strategy. I only want people that are like this has got to be stuff where we're never going to go bust no matter what happens in the world. Like we're planning for all contingencies. So but something like that, oh my God, like that now you get a hundred percent of Americans own stocks. Now if you want to do something like some percentage of it is in your hands and you can do whatever you want and then you just let people YOLO and like flame out. Whatever. Freedom has consequences. Maybe like I'd really have to stop and think about that. But something like that where it's like now you're not going to get that insane K shaped economy because the very thing that's driving the wealthy is now driving the average American. And because they don't understand it, you can't just be like, well go figure it out. We've already answered that question 10 figured out everybody else is.

B (80:31)

Got it. I thought you were gonna Go in a different direction. I thought you were gonna say, like, we'll be in a Great Depression for 10 years. Figure it out. Then after that will be prosperity.

A (80:38)

That sounds like an absolute disaster. So I get the pull towards. So if you're trying to unwind a system, like unwinding it all in one brutal step is almost never the right play. You want to do something far more surgical. You want to give people time to adjust and reallocate and let things happen far more smoothly. Jumping without a parachute is about velocity. It. It is. It isn't even about distance, which is why you can jump from the same distance. And if you have a parachute, you can land safely. The reason that you die on impact without a parachute is you hit terminal velocity. And now you're going so fast that, that the internal organs just splatter. All of your bones turn to dust, your internal organs splatter, and you just. Mechanistically, you're dead. So slowing the descent matters a lot. It's just that we don't have an answer for slowing the descent right now. So we are headed towards bankruptcy, and that will be a cliff, and we'll suddenly fall off of it. So my thing would be, okay, you've got to engage people in the part of the economy that's working assets. You've got to balance your budget and then use the devaluation of the dollar as a mechanism to deploy tools to stop anything super acute from happening. And then if you can drag that out over 20 or 30 years now, it's like people see their wealth going up because of the stocks. You've got a mechanism where they can pull that money out at certain intervals. You'll have to deal with what happens to people that don't have to work. So I think you do want them working. But anyway, there are ways around that problem.

B (82:22)

Got you. And then last thing on this. What would be the impacts to, like, the everyday people if we were to intervene in the Japanese market?

A (82:33)

Well, so historically, the impact has been stabilization. It's worked okay, but it works by devaluing the dollar.

B (82:40)

What does the guy win the dollar, like, mean practically?

A (82:42)

So in. I think it was 1985, we did one of these things, and it devalued the dollar by 50%. Now, I'm so glad you're asking this question, Drew. Thank you. Because I would have forgot to talk about this. Okay, so the fascinating thing is, Besant smart guy is saying I'm ending the era. He. He hasn't said this explicitly, but his actions speak to this I'm ending the era known as King Dollar. And I think it was, I want to say a Clinton era advisor or someone in the Fed, I don't know. Anyway, he coined this phrase and his whole thing was the thing that is in the national security interest of the United States is a strong dollar, period. We do strong dollar, low inflation. Strong dollar, low inflation. That's it. All y' all bitches get in line. And the problem is that you then export your manufacturing because you can't compete with places that can do it on the cheap. Also, exporting becomes very difficult because everything costs a ton when it's made in America and it's very cheap when it's made in China and then brought back to the U.S. this is why we started doing tariffs, because it's like, well, you're just undercutting us. We can't justify manufacturing here because it'll be too expensive. Everything you do is cheap. So what Besson is saying is, oh, no, no, no, we've got a tool. I'll print the shit out of this money. I'll devalue it. It's going to make the debt easier to pay back. It's evil from where I'm sitting, for reasons I've explained, but it is effective in terms of geopolitical wielding of weapon, where it's like, oh, China, in a bit of a precarious situation, are you, oh, be a real shame if 20% of your current manufacturing came back to the US because we lowered our prices by driving the utility, not the utility, the value of the dollar down. Hey, China, you know that game you've been playing for the last 30 years of devaluing the yuan and constantly being right on the edge of where we consider an act of economic warfare? Yeah, yeah, yeah, okay. Instead of coming after you with sanctions and some other bullshit, we're just going to lower the value of our dollar and so now our shit is cheap and we're going to flood the market. Fuck you. And so it's like, but now Americans are like, wait, I don't own assets. This is terrible for me. So you get into that. But it's somewhat balanced out by, if we're devaluing the dollar, manufacturing comes back to the US then theoretically you could start getting things cheaper here. That one is not a guarantee. So I certainly wouldn't count on it. But it's like that's one of the other plays. But given how cheap China could make it also just not terrifying, the shit out of China would have the same effect. So that, that one's a bit of a wash. But that's the game that Bessant, I think is playing on an international stage. He's like, yeah, this might be bad for certain parts of the US economy, but it's great for other parts. Brings back manufacturing, makes us more competitive on the global stage, allows us to hurt certain allies to help Japanese. Because if we're devaluing the dollar by buying yen, then you're in a position where you stabilize their economy. They love you. You stay very tight with them or you do things like what we did with Argentina, that was a little bit different because technically we made money off that. But same idea as well.

B (85:59)

Yeah. And that's. That is time.

A (86:00)

There we go. All right, everybody, thank you guys for joining us. These times are wild. I appreciate very much that you guys are here to be a part of the sense making apparatus. It means a lot. We will be back on Wednesday again. If you have not already, please do subscribe to the channel. It matters a lot. The YouTube algorithm is brutal to get around. Same on X, same on Kick. Wherever you're watching from, guys, subscribe please. It helps a lot for us to reach new people and if this brings any value to you, would you please share it? That would mean the world to us. And I mean it. If you're thinking of launching a business, join me in Impact Theory University. I teach about applying these principles of first principles, thinking cause and effect to business. And with AI on the rise, it's going to be a bigger and bigger thing. All right, everybody, thank you again for being a part of this ecosystem. I love you all and I'll see you on Wednesday. Same time. Peace. There are two types of people in this world. Those who wait for the perfect time to start, and those who start now and figure it out along the way. If you are ready to stop waiting and start taking control of your nutrition, I want you to listen. Most people know they should be getting proper nutrition every day. The challenge is not the knowledge, it's consistency. That's where AG1 comes in. It's a foundational nutritional supplement that turns good intentions into daily action. One scoop, one drink, that's it. No more complicated routines, no more putting it off until tomorrow. Just mix it with water and you're supporting your immune health for the day. AG1 isn't about quick fixes or temporary solutions. It's nutritional supplement designed to become part of your daily ritual. Because real transformation happens through the small decisions you make every single day. It's never too late to create a new healthy habit for 2025. So try AG1 for yourself today. And AG1 is offering new subscribers a free sample $76 gift. When you sign up, you'll get a welcome kit, a bottle of D3K2, and five free travel packs in your first box. So make sure to check out drinkag1.comimpact to get this offer again. That's drinkag1.comimpact to start your new year on a healthier note.