What They’re Not Telling You About the Iran War: Power, Propaganda & Protest, The Collapse of White Collar Work: 20% Unemployment Predicted by AI Leaders, Bernie’s $4.4 Trillion Wealth Raid: Will It Destroy America’s Economy? | Weekly Recap

Summary

Podcast Summary: Impact Theory with Tom Bilyeu

Episode: What They’re Not Telling You About the Iran War: Power, Propaganda & Protest, The Collapse of White Collar Work, Bernie’s $4.4 Trillion Wealth Raid
Release Date: March 8, 2026
Host: Tom Bilyeu

---

Episode Overview

This episode of Impact Theory dives deep into three crucial, headline-dominating topics:

1. The new US-and-allied war with Iran and the tangled realities of power, propaganda, and protest involved.
2. The ongoing and escalating collapse of white collar work as AI leaders predict up to 20% unemployment.
3. Bernie Sanders’ proposal for a $4.4 trillion wealth tax on billionaires and its potential to reshape or destroy the US economy.

Tom Bilyeu offers a nuanced, pragmatic breakdown of complex issues, cutting through mainstream narratives and urging listeners to confront uncomfortable truths shaping our world.

---

1. Unpacking the Iran War: Power, Propaganda & Protest

(Discussion from 01:35 to 13:45)

Key Discussion Points

• Information Warfare & Propaganda

  • “AI is throwing a ton of lies into the mix. There is so much propaganda.” (01:45, Tom Bilyeu)
  • Emphasizes how all sides manipulate messaging for their own interests, making objective truth hard to discern.

• The Five Motivating Threads Behind US Policy:

  • 1. Protecting $2 Trillion in Gulf Investments (35% of motivation)
    • Trump’s economic agenda depends on Saudi, Qatari, and UAE deals (01:50).
    • Iran’s proximity to the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint for 31% of global oil shipments—makes stability essential.
    • “You cannot build a $2 trillion economic architecture in the Gulf… if the biggest military threat sits across the water.” (04:02)
  • 2. Delaying Nuclear Breakout (25% of motivation)
    • Urgency based on the perceived threat of Iran’s nuclear capability.
    • Previous US and Israeli strikes (June 2025) damaged, but did not eliminate, the program (05:25).
    • “Military action can delay nuclear programs, but they’re rarely going to eliminate them.” (10:07)
  • 3. Israeli Strategic Necessity
    • Israel’s transition from containment to direct engagement with Iran since October 2023’s events.
    • US joins strikes to keep economic interests protected and prevent being seen as “a puppet of Israel.” (06:35)
  • 4. Regime Decapitation & Revolutionary Opportunity (15% of motivation)
    • Recent mass civilian massacres destabilized the Iranian regime, creating a rare internal vulnerability.
    • Strategy is to strike and let internal Iranian dynamics play out, rather than deploy US troops (08:07).
    • “This isn’t regime change in the Iraq sense. Nobody’s going to be deploying ground troops.” (08:45)
  • 5. Domestic Political Calculus
    • Trump faces backlash from his own base for starting a new war: “No new wars” promise is undermined. (12:03)
    • Risk of political defeat if conflict goes poorly; existential for Trump’s presidency.

• Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

  • “Trump is selfish and pragmatic. If you understand him through that lens, the way that he’s going to handle Iran is going to make a lot more sense.” (03:10)
  • “He’s the president of power. Trump is powerful. He is exerting the might of the US Military, and he’ll give you an opportunity for peace. But if you don’t take it, he will strike.” (12:05)

• Religious vs. Economic Motivations

  • A listener challenges Tom on ignoring religion as a motivation in favor of ‘single variable’ economics.
  • Tom clarifies: “What I'm trying to explain is why now? What's the real motivation right now?... religion is going to leave you wanting. And the thing that will explain it is going to be economics.” (14:49)

---

2. White Collar Work’s Looming Collapse & the AI Tidal Wave

(Segment starts 17:30 and especially 21:22—27:18)

Key Discussion Points

• Jack Dorsey’s Block Layoffs: A Turning Point

  • Nearly half the company (4400 people) let go, not for cost-saving, but because “AI has simply gotten so good that they can do more with smaller teams.” (21:51)
  • “AI is terraforming the entire planet, but it is certainly terraforming right now, the jobs market.” (22:08)

• Predictions of Massive White Collar Unemployment

  • Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: 20% unemployment in white collar jobs within the next year or two. (22:54)
  • Even 10% would double historical unemployment, with potentially Depression-level effects.
  • “If people do not understand how fast-paced this is already moving, they are going to get caught flat footed.” (23:15)

• Sequence of AI-driven Job Disruption

  • Primary casualties are not truck drivers, but knowledge workers like coders, lawyers, etc.
  • “If you understand that what AI actually is, is just intelligence… what industries are most impacted by disembodied intelligence?” (24:08)

• Entrepreneurship Amid Uncertainty

  • Tom encourages starting businesses but bluntly notes: “Most of them are going to get hit by a Mack truck. As long as that window stays open, people have a chance to enrich themselves by being a little bit faster to getting to the AI.” (25:45)

• Economic Consequences: Two Paths

  • Path A: Social Disorder/Bloodshed — Populist revolt due to mass job loss and uncertainty.
  • Path B: Opportunity/Transformation — Hope that innovation creates new opportunities, repeating the cycle of past technological revolutions.
  • “Last three major changes... wiped out one to two generations, man. And those people… your life sucked for the rest of your life. Your kid’s life was rocky, but your grandkids’ life was awesome.” (28:34)

---

3. Bernie Sanders’ $4.4 Trillion Wealth Tax: Will It Destroy the Economy?

(Discussion from 30:27—37:30)

Key Discussion Points

• The Sanders Proposal

  • Raise $4.4 trillion by taxing billionaires, cutting their wealth in half and redistributing via stimulus checks, healthcare, teacher pay, housing, etc. (30:27)
  • “Hey, hey. Credit where credit is due at least. He’s like, all right, I’m going to steal from these [billionaires], but I’m gonna give it to you… so now we’re in on the racket together. That’s at least smart.” (30:51)

• Economic Realities and Potential Pitfalls

  • The wealth tax would only cover roughly two years of US deficit spending, at current levels.
  • “If I took all their wealth, it’s just four years of overage. I’m not changing anything about our deficit spending.” (32:34)
  • Warns this would not fix systemic overspending—after billionaire wealth is gone, average Americans are next in line for taxation.

• Unintended Consequences & Historical Parallels

  • Forced asset sales to pay taxes could “break the economy. All the assets plummet in value.”
  • Tom draws lessons from China’s historical shift from Mao (innovation suppressed) to Deng Xiaoping (rewarding innovation and lifting millions from poverty).
  • “When you break their back and steal their [wealth], they stop innovating.” (35:32)
  • “The cause and effect is knowable. And if you depart the cause and effect train for the emotional train, you start acting like an idiot and you make decisions that absolutely collapse economies.” (36:07)

• Memorable Moments

  • “Schrodinger’s money… if you look at the money, then the money’s there, but if you don’t see it…” (37:17, attributed to chat user jwoke92)

---

4. Timestamps for Key Segments

• War with Iran Dissection: 01:35–13:45
• Religion vs. Economics in War: 14:09–14:49
• AI and Job Market Disruption: 21:22–27:18
• Predicting AI’s Economic Impact: 27:18–30:27
• Bernie Sanders Wealth Tax Breakdown: 30:27–37:30

---

5. Notable Quotes (with Speaker Attribution & Timestamps)

• “AI is throwing a ton of lies into the mix. There is so much propaganda.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (01:45)

• “Trump is selfish and pragmatic. If you understand him through that lens, the way that he’s going to handle Iran is going to make a lot more sense.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (03:10)

• “Military action can delay nuclear programs, but they’re rarely going to eliminate them.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (10:07)

• “He’s the president of power... he’ll give you an opportunity for peace. But if you don’t take it, he will strike.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (12:05)

• “What I'm trying to explain is why now?... religion is going to leave you wanting… the thing that will explain it is going to be economics.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (14:49)

• “AI is terraforming the entire planet, but it is certainly terraforming right now, the jobs market.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (22:08)

• “If people do not understand how fast paced this is already moving, they are going to get caught flat footed.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (23:15)

• “Last three major changes... wiped out one to two generations, man... your kid’s life was rocky, but your grandkids life was awesome.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (28:34)

• “If I took all their wealth, it’s just four years of overage. I’m not changing anything about our deficit spending.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (32:34)

• “When you break their back and steal their [wealth], they stop innovating.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (35:32)

• “The cause and effect is knowable. And if you depart the cause and effect train for the emotional train, you start acting like an idiot and you make decisions that absolutely collapse economies.”
  – Tom Bilyeu (36:07)

• "Schrodinger’s money… if you look at the money, then the money’s there, but if you don’t see it…”
  – jwoke92 via Tom Bilyeu (37:17)

---

6. Conclusion: Episode Takeaways

Tom Bilyeu urges listeners to pierce through headline narratives and understand the foundational forces—economic, social, technological—reshaping our era. He challenges the idea that motivations behind war, economic upheaval, or drastic wealth redistribution can ever be reduced to a single variable or meme. The message: To thrive, one must confront uncomfortable realities, think long-term and systemically, and prepare for transitions before the majority.

---

For detailed insights, refer to the above timestamps. Skip ahead to segments that align with your interests—whether it’s the Iran conflict, AI-driven disruption, or the future of American wealth redistribution.

Transcript

[A]

Today's show is made possible by plod. You think you remember conversations accurately? The data says you do not. Studies Show we forget 50% of what we hear within an hour. That client call where you discuss pricing, you're missing half of it. That strategy meeting with three action items, you remember two, maybe. But PLOD can fix this. It's an AI assistant that captures every conversation, meetings, calls in person, discussions. PLOD records everything, then delivers accurate transcripts, summaries and action items automatically. You can literally just wear it. No more guessing what was said, no more. I think they mentioned. Ask PLOD exactly what was decided, who's responsible, what the next steps are. Right now, listeners can get 10% off or more on all PLOD devices with the code Tom10. Just type P, L, A U, D, AI, slash Tom into Google, or simply search Plod on Google and use the code Tom10 at checkout to get started today. Reggie, I just sold my car online. Let's go, Grandpa. Wait, you did? Yep, on Carvana. Just put in the license plate, answered a few questions, got an offer in minutes. Easier than setting up that new digital picture frame. You don't say. Yeah, they're even picking it up tomorrow. Talk about fast. Wow. Way to go. So, about that picture frame. Forget about it. Until Carvana makes one, I'm not interested. Car selling made easy on Carvana.

[B]

Pick up.

[A]

These may apply.

[B]

All right, Mr. No New wars has got us in what seems like another war.

[A]

Economics just went kinetic as the US has launched a war against Iran. America, Israel, uk, France and a massive swath of the Middle east are now at war. The only question is, how big does it get? How long does it go on for? To understand that, though, we have to understand what is actually going on. Because as always with these things, people are getting distracted by messaging around. This AI is throwing a ton of lies into the mix. There is so much propaganda. But understand that you are in the middle of an information landscape that is all about fighting a battle on that front as well, getting people to believe things from the perspective of whatever country is laying things out. So keep that in mind as we go through all of this. If you look at what he said to the Iranian people, this is words, this is a paraphrase, but it's pretty close. This is your chance to rise up and take your country back. If you look at what he did in Venezuela, this was not about him going in and putting boots on the ground. Now, I think this is going to play out very differently than Venezuela. Iran and Venezuela are two very different animals. However, what I want people to understand is how differently Trump moves when it comes to these kinds of attacks. Trump is selfish and pragmatic. If you understand him through that lens, the way that he's going to handle Iran is going to make a lot more sense. He is guaranteed a loss in the midterms if he gets drug into putting troops on the ground. Now, will Israel put boots on the ground? That's far more believable. Trump is going to claim victory while staying at 30,000ft as long as, and this is narrative warfare, as long as he can say that he set back their nuclear ambitions. If you try to trace this all through cause and effect, if you think up from first principles, what motivates people to do the kinds of things that we're seeing the US do, that we're seeing the Iranians do, the people of Iran versus the regime of Iran, how the regime of Iran will kill its own people, how the people of Iran are willing to rise up because the people of Iran see this very differently than the messaging would have you believe. Putting all the things on the table, I think that there are five things that are at play here. The first thing that's going on right now, the economic thread that's going to tie all of this together, is protecting the $2 trillion in Gulf investment commitments. This is the biggest issue for Trump. I'm going to round this to 35% of his motivation. Trump secured over $2 trillion in investment agreements across Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE. Guess who's getting bombed by Iran? These deals are the centerpiece of Trump's economic agenda. Manufacturing, AI, infrastructure, defense sales, energy development. It's also how he's pulling Gulf sovereign wealth away from China. Now, here's the problem. About 20 million barrels of oil transit the Strait of Hormuz daily, equaling roughly 31% of all seaborne oil flows. Iran has the ability to threaten or disrupt that choke point at will. This is why the US has been going after all of their naval ships, because they're worried that they're going to plant mines in the Strait of Hormuz, causing global disruption. Many analysts have warned that if they're able to disrupt just that one strait, that a global recession is all but guaranteed on the back of the disruption to oil prices. Now, you cannot build a $2 trillion economic architecture in the Gulf. Right. If you're President Trump, while the biggest military threat to Gulf stability sits across the water with ballistic missiles, proxy armies, and a credible nuclear breakout capability, he's toast his whole economic agenda is the only thing that he's riding on. The only way that Trump can continue to spend recklessly is if he grows. Okay, let's talk nuclear breakout. We'll put that in the second position. If you look at the focus here, you have a closing window here. That will is roughly 25% of what is being done. What's motivating this move at this time? Now, the U.S. defense Intelligence Agency estimated it would take Iran probably less than one week to produce enough weapons grade uranium for a first bomb. We've heard that so many times. So that I think you can just assume is not actually true, that it's something more like they haven't given up their nuclear ambitions. They're still pushing it forward though even there's some debate around that. But obviously the June 2025 strikes that damaged facilities didn't necessarily eliminate the entire program. And one of Iran's key lessons from the June 2025 war is that you can make it far more expensive for them to be attacked if you drive those things into underground facilities because they're more immune to strikes. They're hidden from IAEA inspectors on and on. So every month of delay made a future military option just more expensive. But this urgency existed in 2024 as well, and we didn't do anything about it. So what changed was the economic architecture that made tolerating that threat impossible. Because you've got to stabilize things. Okay, three, this is the one that gets everybody up in arms. Israeli strategic necessity and alliance management. So Iran has been on an escalatory trajectory with Israel since October of 2023 for obvious reasons. October 7th. That just set a lot of things in motion. Israel's strategy over the prior two years had transformed from containing IR proxies to directly striking Iran itself, neutralizing Hezbollah's second strike threat in Lebanon, destroying air defense systems in Syria, and opening a direct flight path into Iranian airspace. Israel had already struck Iran in June of 25. Iran and Israeli proxies have been engaged in conflict since 1985, which escalated into direct confrontations in 2024 and then the 12 day war that I'm sure all of you guys are very aware of from 2025. Israel was going to act again regardless. Okay? Israel was going to do their thing. Whether the US Would be a coordinating partner or a bystander. And joining the operation gives the US Operational control over escalation management and ensures that the strikes align with American economic interests in the region rather than purely Israeli ones. If Trump knows that, he's going to get involved that he's going to trail Israel. That is terrible for the Trump is a puppet of Israel narrative. So he's going to be hyper aware of that. And then also he's going to want to take credit for this if it goes well. Now, that's a gigantic if. And that brings us to the fourth thing. Regime decapitation and opportunistic destabilization. I'm going to put this at 15%, because it's such a big if. A month and a half before the attack, Iran massacred thousands, maybe tens of thousands. Reports go all the way up to 30,000 plus of their own civilians getting killed during the largest protest since the Islamic Revolution back in the 70s. The regime was already fragile. Khomeini was 86. There was no clear succession plan that wouldn't produce internal power struggles, although they did replace him, only to have him killed, like a couple of hours later. All of that creates the potential for a power vacuum while the Iranian public is already in a revolutionary mood. So this isn't regime change in the Iraq sense. Nobody's going to be deploying ground troops. It's about decapitation. That's designed to let internal dynamics do the work. Now we'll see if the Iranian people rise up. Presumably, if you've killed 30,000 of them, that strikes to the heart of people's desire to go out and protest. But from some of the footage I've seen, man, they're going to, what, look like. I don't know what the buildings are, but they look like official structures. They look large, monumental kinds of structures where they're dancing, waving American flags, Iranian flags, Israeli flags. This may be one of those historic moments where the internal tensions were so high that simply by delivering a destabilizing blow, that the people and the country really do have what they need to move in and to get this going. We'll see. But that, I think, is the only way that you'll see a regime change is whatever the people inside the country do. This is where I think the most direct look at Venezuela comes in. Trump is selfish and pragmatic, okay? So if you think of him that way, you look at what he did in Venezuela. Hey, Maduro, super happy to negotiate with you. Oh, you don't want to negotiate?

[B]

Word.

[A]

Boom. Blow up a bunch of people, grab him, snatch him up, parade him around New York streets in an open van. That is the most 2026 dystopian social media shit I've ever seen in my life. Absolutely crazy. New person comes in, hey, do you want to end up like Maduro or do you want to negotiate? And he'll just go down the list and so cool. Iran, this is your shot. Iranian people rise up and if you guys are chill, then we'll just march forward in lockstep. If you're not and we've got a problem, then I'm going to negotiate with battleships. I mean, that's just the Trump playbook. Again, I'm not asking you guys to like it. I'm just telling you this is the way that the world is playing out. This is great power politics before your very eyes. And having all this happen in 2026, where we can see everything happening in real time and the flood of information is just non stop and it is very difficult to hide anything. We are going to be asked to confront the realities of war and not just the niceties, the narrative, the actual reality that people do what they can. While I wish we lived in a world where these kind of power politics weren't, the reality that humans aren't the most dangerous and deadly animal that God ever created and that we didn't constantly clash with each other, with each other, but we do. And so this is the world that we live in now. Whether all of this produces a better outcome is such a massive question mark. The military action can delay nuclear programs, but they're rarely going to eliminate them. Not when the will of the people is such that we need this. Understand that Iran believes that they need a nuclear program because no one is coming to save them. They're in a hostile region. And so if they are going to preserve themselves because remember they were invaded by Iraq at one point. So it's not like they look around and see nothing but friends. They look around and see that they're surrounded by enemies and allies and that they need to become strong because nobody is going to save them. And they don't ever want to be in the position that they were in during the Iraq Iran conflict, where they were getting gassed and their people were being killed by the Iraqis in contravention of international law and they just realized, oh, I guess this is. It doesn't matter. And if Iranian suffering is good for somebody else, then Iranians will suffer. The last piece, domestic political calculus. Trump ultimately is going to be receiving massive backlash. He already is. So even Nick Fuentes says has turned against Trump. Do not vote in the midterms.

[B]

The Republicans have to lose.

[A]

He feels betrayed by Trump and the whole America first agenda. No new wars. I'm sure Trump is still going to beat the drum of I'm the president of peace. But the reality is the accurate brand would be he's the president of power. Trump is powerful. He is exerting the might of the US Military, and he'll give you an opportunity for peace, but if you don't take it, he will strike. I don't think he's doing this because he is truly a president of peace. I don't think he's doing this because he thinks that the American people will be on his side in the beginning. I think he's doing this because he knows it will be effective and it positions America in a place of dominance, which will be good economically if he pulls it off. Now, if it turns into a show, destabilizes the Middle east, the Strait of Hormuz gets closed down. Now, you're going to see a problem, certainly for our allies, but in the US Given how much energy we produce for ourself, we will probably suffer the brunt of that the least. However, it will make it very difficult for Trump to hit his economic agenda. And so, yeah, you can expect if it turns into a show, it'll be a political nightmare for him. And I don't think he's a fool. He understands if this goes poorly, he's out in the midterms. He will get impeached immediately. He will get voted out of office in 28, barring something unforeseen. And then they will hound him legally until the end of time. And so this really becomes existential. So I don't think he's doing this because he thinks the American people are like, yes, please go invade Iran. I think it's far more complicated than that. And I'll also place on here an overarching thing that needs to be woven into the bedrock of the number one motivator, which is China, the China of it all, understanding that there's a proxy war going on beneath this, it's critically important.

[B]

Okay, and then Pete Hegseth had a press briefing earlier, and a journalist asked him a really good question. I want to hear his response and then hear kind of your breakdown of it.

[A]

Reagan Reese with the Daily Caller. Two questions for you. The president said yesterday in his video message that we will leave Iran when we complete all of our objectives. What are our objectives? And can you share more information on how the soldiers who were killed were killed.

[B]

So what are our objectives?

[A]

Well, I laid out the objectives, as did the chairman. They're completely nested. I mean, Iran has an ability to project power against us and our allies in ways that we can't tolerate. So, okay, this is part of the dog and pony show. You're going to hear that a lot. A true thing. That does not explain the timing. And so part of what I'm trying to get people to focus on, to actually understand how all of this stuff plays out. And yes, true statement, but not at all explanatory of why now? Marusha Dark316 says Tom, I grant you that economics matters a lot, but I feel like you are. You are guilty of single variable thinking. Some people willingly turn down wealth for integrity or even die for their principles.

[B]

There is a religious aspect to this all.

[A]

Yeah. So it's a very fair point. And I want to make sure that people understand I'm certainly not reducing this down to a single variable. And I think what you're trying to get me to focus on is what is the role of the religious aspect? And I will say this, it's not zero. How did we get the people to rise up? We broke their back economically. Okay, so I get it. That stuff, you're 100% right. And humans need that thing to live and die for. I agree wholeheartedly. There's no doubt about that. And I don't want to gloss over that. What I'm trying to explain is why now? What's the real motivation right now? And if we want to talk about how we end up with a religious uprising, we can certainly do that. You know, where they take power in 1979. We can talk about life through a religious angle, for sure. We can talk about. Is that part of why the IRGC is fighting as hard as they are? Is that why you still see moral police on the trains in Iran even as the people are stopping to wear their hijabs, which is happening right now? All of that, we can have that conversation. But if you want to understand what gears turn to make something happen right now, religion is going to leave you wanting. And the thing that will explain it is going to be economics. I'm trying to lay all these things out on the table. I didn't spend a lot of time talking about religion because I don't think it's a big play in terms of what's happening right now. We're hitting pause for a moment, but there's plenty more ahead, so don't go anywhere. A great wardrobe is not complicated. A few pieces that fit well hold up over time and work in almost any situation. That's it. That's what you need. The problem is finding them without paying luxury prices. That's exactly what Quint is built around. I picked up one of their cashmere sweaters and let me tell you, the softness is amazing and the quality actually caught me off guard. This is 100% Mongolian cashmere. That makes it easy to build a great wardrobe. Lightweight cashmere linen bottoms, short sleeve Mongolian cashmere polos, Pima cotton tees. All amazing quality. And every factory they partner with meets rigorous standards for craftsmanship and ethical production. Right now go to quints.com impact pod for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's a full year to build your wardrobe and love it. And you will now available in Canada too. Go to Q U I N C

[B]

E

[A]

Impact Pod for free shipping and 365 day returns. That's quint.com impactpod the people who win, they're not smarter. They just absorb more ideas faster. There are thousands of books right now on business, psychology, leadership books that have already changed how the best operators think. And everyone you haven't read is a gap between you and the people who have. This is a bandwidth problem, not a discipline problem. And that's exactly what Blinkist was built to solve. It takes the world's best nonfiction books and distills them into 15 minute summaries you can read or listen to. It's got over 9,000 titles. We're talking atomic habits, Thinking fast and slow. The hard thing about hard things, books you know you should have read by now, done in the time it takes to drink your coffee. And because it's built for mobile, your commute becomes a classroom. Blinkist also sends you personalized recommendations so you actually build a daily learning practice instead of just planning to do one. Start your free trial at blinkist.com/ that's B L I N K I-t.com blink impact start learning aggressively today. It will change your life. Let's talk about a problem that is hiding in plain sight. You're using AI for everything now. Like everybody else, every single conversation is being stored, analyzed and used to build a profile on you. That's where Duck AI comes in. It is a new product from DuckDuckGo, the company that's been protecting privacy online since 2008. Duck AI lets you chat privately with ChatGPT, Claude and other popular AIs all in one place. Your conversations aren't used for tracking, training or profiling you. There's no account required and it's completely free. DuckDuckGo built this specifically for data protection, not data collection. They're designed to help stop your Information from being stored, tracked or misused by hackers, scammers and data hungry companies. No signups, no subscriptions, no learning curve. Duck AI gives you access to the same AI tools you're already using, but without the privacy trade off. If you want to use AI without giving up your privacy, visit Duck AIImpact today. That's Duck AI Impact, a private way to chat with AI from DuckDuckGo, where AI is always optional and private. Thanks for sticking around. Let's get right back into the action. Language fails me in my ability to articulate to people the need to wake up and pay attention to what's going on. The Jack thing really is that thing. It's the moment, like if you think about like the timeline of like the adoption of AI and how AI actually impacted the world, Jack's tweet is going to be on that. Or what Jack did and then announced it is going to be on that. It's pretty crazy. I think this is really going to be be something massive. AI just went from threatening the job market to actually blowing a hole through it. Jack Dorsey, in a move that is prophetic. Hear my words, is prophetic of what is to come over the next 12 months, just lopped off 4400 people from his company block. That's nearly half of his staff. The company is already wildly profitable. They do roughly $2 million in profit per employee, which is better than most companies by a lot. And that they had already done the right sizing post Covid back in 2024. So that's not what this move was about. Dorsey said directly he was firing everyone because AI has simply gotten so good that they can do more with smaller teams. He noted that giving the productivity boosts that they're already seeing from AI okay just what's already happened and what is likely to come in the future. It was either continuously reduced slowly over the next couple of years and still end up with the same result, or do it all in one fell swoop to maximize the benefits and preserve company morale, which is often hurt more by slow attrition. So this is one of those breathtaking moves that if people understand in context and they get what's really happening, they are going to understand. The phrase that I keep coming to is AI is terraforming the entire planet, but it is certainly terraforming right now, the jobs market. It is just going to be fundamentally different over the next 24 months. Not saying that they all go away. I'm going to give you some predictions about what other people have said in terms of how much unemployment there's going to be. But for a second, even if you don't see a doomsday scenario, the odds that the job market looks anything like it did at the beginning of 25 in two years is zero. It is going to be radically different. And if people do not understand how fast paced this is already moving, they are going to get caught flat footed. Specific predictions. Wise Anthropic CEO Amodi, who we're just talking about, he said a while ago that AI was likely to lead to roughly 20% unemployment in white collar jobs in the next year or two. So that means we're talking the next 12 to 18 months. Given that he said that a while ago, if he's even directionally correct, and let's say it's only 10%, that is still psychotically disruptive. Understand that a 4% unemployment rate is like, okay, we're comfortable there. 10% more than double, 20% 5x. Like you start getting into depression territory, it doesn't mean that we'll actually be in a depression. I want to be very clear. It's all unknown. We don't know how this stuff is going to manifest, but it is going to be radically different.

[B]

It's interesting. I wanted to pull something up. I was looking for it. This was a book, I don't even know what the title is. But he outlined exactly what is coming next. And this is going to lead to

[A]

my ultimate question so that people have the appropriate context. This is a book that's outlining what jobs are disappearing and when and basically

[B]

why people thought the truck drivers were going away. Right when Tesla announced the semi truck. And we're like, dang, all the truck drivers are going to get fired. And while we were waiting for the truck drivers to get fired, all the software coding jobs are kind of getting eaten right now. And then we're going to turn over there, like, oh, okay, they got Silicon Valley and then we're going to turn this way and all the lawyers are going. And it just seems like all these different industries separately and equally are all on a timeline to AI is showing up now.

[A]

Yeah. If you understand that what AI actually is is just intelligence, then it's like, okay, well what industries are most impacted by disembodied intelligence? Because right now they are increasingly in robotics and so they are increasingly mobile in the same way that humans are. But I would say they lag way farther behind in the physicality, the ability to go into a space, especially like an unpredictable space. Like think of an electrician. Sometimes you're crawling under a house, sometimes you have to open up a wall. Like all of this stuff is, is very difficult because it's just, it's not standardized when you disembody it and you standardize something through a computer. Now a computer is like the ultimate rules based universe. Once you're in the computer, everything is just a bunch of if this, then that statements. And so intelligence is all that you need. When you take that lens and look at the world and say, okay, what are those disembodied intelligence based jobs? Those are all going to go away. Those are all going to change dramatically. So one person will be able to do a lot more. Now if we were in an economic upswing as AI were coming on board, I would have a totally different read on this. And I would say there's so much money sloshing around in the system, you know, everybody's jubilant. What's going to end up happening is more and more people are going to start their own companies, which I do believe is going to happen. But there's enough money for a lot of these companies to succeed. The reality is this is happening in an economically depressed moment. So all of that same fracturing is going to happen. I have an ongoing pitch for people that they need to be starting a company. Like if you have even a minor entrepreneurial bone in your body. And look, I'm hyper aware I'm saying that to a bunch of employees who, if they listen to me, are going to go start their own thing. But the reality is I don't, I try not to fight the, the tides of history like this is just the way that it's going to be. More and more people are going to start their own company, rightly so, and in good economic times I think a lot of them would survive. Unfortunately, in depressed economic times, most of them are going to get hit by a Mack truck. And as long as that window stays open, people have a chance to enrich themselves by being a little bit faster to getting to the AI.

[B]

I like the future looking perspective and encouraging people to start businesses and things like that. But there's two things that I was seeing in this Jack tweet. Like the Jack tweet I was going through the comments and stuff like that. On one hand, the US government and private companies over the last, let's call it 16 months has announced more than 675,000 layoffs. And this is the 300 from Doge, 78,000 from UPS, 30,000 from Amazon aggregating all of those together. And then on the other hand, we have the revised job report. We lost a million jobs. Hypothetically speaking, we're like negative 1.6 million jobs over the last 24 months. I'm being a little bit flexible with the timelines. That alone, kind of to your point, this was a different economic situation. People be like, yeah, let me go start my company right now. But I think a lot of people are home kind of feeling struggles as opposed to, like, being excited to get to the next step. Now, going to my main question now, everybody's thinking, okay, if 2 million people are getting. Are losing their job, and then we have another, let's say 10 million people that are going to lose their job from all these other different industries because of AI, who's going to be spending the money money, who's going to be buying these things? Are robots going to be selling other robots? Wouldn't that crash the economy? Help us figure out what happens when this much job loss gets pulled out? And what would the actual thing happen to prices, commodities? Would the rich just be okay on their island? Like, what would actually happen to the economy in totality?

[A]

Yeah. So we're going to predict the future, which means we are going to be wrong. However, I think that we can get pretty directionally correct. So there are two paths before you. Path number one is bloodshed. And the anxiety in the system builds up as more and more people lose their jobs that they just don't care. Care that, yes, it's going to be better for my grandkids, but it's not better for me. And so, you know, a year is a long time when you're faced with tremendous uncertainty. And if you shove enough people into tremendous uncertainty, in a moment of populism, they will revolt. Then you've got it disrupted. It absolutely cratered a generation, maybe two. But it. The gifts that it brings are so profound that everybody's just like, keep your eye on the prize. This is making the world so much better. And everybody's so enthusiastic about the new jobs that are coming on the market that kids coming out of high school are just thrilled. And they're like, oh, my God. The opportunities that are open to me that were never open before, this is incredible. And all these boomers that are like doomsdaying AI, like, I don't. You guys weren't trained on the right thing. That's a you problem. Now, let's keep in mind the last three major changes that we've had. Industrial revolution, electrification and Internet iFooding. All three of those wiped out one to two generation generations, man. And those people literally was like you would lose your job, let's say in your mid to late 30s and then your life sucked for the rest of your life. Your kid's life was rocky, but your grandkids life was awesome because they got to build on top of this new technology that just repeats and repeats and repeats Deaths of despair from the internetification, we are still dealing with that. And so I think a lot of people, because a lot of them were young and don't realize just how many boomers and Gen Xers got run over by that bus. Especially when you realize that the Internet is part of what allowed globalization to become what it became. These things tend to play out like that, but it does create this tremendous opportunity. Taking a short break, but there's more impact theory after. Stay tuned. Let's talk about lazy money. Most people think owning gold is smart, and it is, to be honest. But the question is, why aren't you making it work for you? For you? Monetary metals changes all of that. They've built a way for your gold to earn yield paid not in dollars, but in more physical gold, up to 4% per year. More ounces every single month, compounding in hard money, your assets producing more of itself. And unlike most precious metal programs, storage and insurance are included so your yield isn't eaten up by hidden fees. Monetary metals is how you opt out of that game entirely and start stacking more ounces whether the price moves or not. Click the link in the show notes or visit monetary-metals.comimpact to learn more. Again, that's monetary-metals.com impact. This is a paid advertisement. Thanks for staying tuned. Now let's get back to it.

[B]

Bernie Sanders is proposing a bill to raise 4.4 trillion in taxes from America's billionaires.

[A]

Let's go.

[B]

Move. That would virtually cut their massive fortunes in half.

[A]

The richest people are doing phenomenally well and in many cases they are paying very little in taxes.

[B]

A chunk of the money will go towards sending 3k stimulus checks to every person earning 150k.

[A]

Okay, so that's smart.

[B]

There goes the money in the pocket.

[A]

Hey, hey. Credit where credit is due at least. He's like, all right, I'm going to steal from these, but I'm gonna give it to you. Cause I don't. I'm not gonna balance the budget. But I'm gonna steal. But I'm gonna steal from you.

[B]

I'm giving to you.

[A]

I'm gonna give you some. I'm gonna Give you some. So now we're in on the racket together. That's at least smart. This is Trump's playbook. This is people really going, oh, word morality. Doesn't matter, Don't. None of that matters. I'm gonna take Yoshi, I'm gonna break the economy. Don't worry, don't worry about that part. It's all gonna be bad.

[B]

You have 3,000. What's the economy?

[A]

But I'm going to give you three grand. So this is going to be awesome. Look, I know it, hey, it didn't work out in New York And I know 47 days after promising that he was going to like put money in your pocket, make a bunch of free start it. You raised your taxes. I know, I know, I know. Your rents went up despite me promising I was going to lower it. Don't worry about that. Just let me take their money and I'll give you three grand. It's going to be good. You guys are going to love it.

[B]

It gets better. It gets better. This is the money would also be used to reverse the cuts to Medicaid, raise the minimum salary of every public school teacher to 60K, expand Medicare to cover dental, vision and hearing for seniors, build 850 billion of affordable housing. Another tweet had like end homelessness. So when they say affordable housing, it's not just like luxury apartments in downtown LA type thing. So please provide universal childcare.

[A]

Remind me how much of what was the raw amount of dollars he was going to take from the wealthy?

[B]

4.4 trillion.

[A]

Okay, Drew, do you remember how many trillion dollars just in deficit spending we do every year?

[B]

I want to say 2.5.

[A]

Yep. So roughly 2.

[B]

Yeah, 2.

[A]

So what he's stealing is going to be roughly two years just of overage. So he's going to take half their wealth. So he's now admitting if I took all their wealth, it's just four years of overage. I'm not changing anything about our deficit spending. And by the way, I'm going to increase our deficit spending once we're out of this because these policies will all be put in place and I will, as Margaret Thatcher has tried to tell people, I will have run out of other people's money. Now I have nowhere to go. I did not change our spending problem at all. And first I bought you a two year years just of the deficit spending, by the way, at current levels. So all the smoke and mirrors and all, that's all. Then after four years, even if I confiscate all their wealth, all their wealth, 100% of it. Guess who I'm coming after next?

[B]

Did not sell. Billionaires.

[A]

Correct. Because you guys have all the money. And once people understand billionaires only have, like, I forget the exact number I'm going to, it's less than 10%. So now all of a sudden, it's like, oh, Z's. They're coming for everybody. This is how it always plays out. And so it is wild to me. Either Bernie Sanders is so dumb that he has no business being an elected official, or he is evil. He doesn't. He actually doesn't strike me as dumb. Or, sorry, he doesn't strike me as evil. I don't look at him and see somebody who's evil. So I'm only left with, he's dumb. So it is. Look, economics, they are hard to understand. It is a very complex and animal. But the same people that will just go ballistic over tariffs or attacks and how dare you. And this is going to absolutely destroy the economy. Cannot see their way to running the math on, well, how much wealth do they have? And if you take it all, what are you left with? And once you take it all, what do you. Are you going to then change the spending structure? And oh, P.S. if you're willing to change the spending structure in four years, why aren't you willing to change it now? Because you can't give these breaks to everybody for long. You know that Your own math tells you that. So cool. I accept. Remember his own words. I'm taking half their wealth now to give you guys three grand checks and make these changes. None of that's going to impact the deficit.

[B]

What happens in two years?

[A]

Yeah, correct. And so then it's like, well, he's going to steal the rest. Yeah, probably. But by the way, we haven't even talked about one thing which we have to talk about. Hey, as a reminder, you're going to force. None of that money's real. Okay? This is the part that people keep forgetting. It's not real money money. It's potential money. And when you go and try to sell, make them sell their things so that they can pay this tax burden, it breaks the economy. All the assets plummet in value. Also, if you're a builder and the government just took away half of your money. 1. Did you flee the country ahead of time? Yes. Did you do anything and everything that you could to avoid this? Yes. Will you stop producing if there are no upsides? Yes. Tom. How do you know that's true? Tom, are you just reading that ayn Rand book. No, mother. I'm looking at China. So look at China. Innovation equals zero for Mao's entire reign. Why? Because he wanted to make sure that everybody had equal outcomes. And so there was no reward for you for innovating. So why the would you innovate? Then Mao dies, Deng Xiaoping comes into power, and he says getting rich is awesome. And he lets what happen. He lets people get inequal outcomes. He lets inequality happen. And what happens over the next couple of decades, more people are pulled out of grinding poverty than any other time in human history. Oh, that's right. These policies have consequences. And when you incentivize builders to build by letting them win more than the next person, they innovate and they build and it helps everybody. And when you break their back and steal their. They stop innovating. So, boys and girls, can we please admit these things are knowable? The cause and effect is knowable. And if you depart the cause and effect train for the emotional train, you start acting like a idiot and you make decisions that absolutely collapse economies. It's so.

[B]

Okay, we got some super chats, but there's been two bangers. One CC crazy said, I thought we had financial deficit because we already ran out of other people's money.

[A]

Money.

[B]

That's good.

[A]

And then why is that good?

[B]

No, that was like, funny. Like, it's funny. Like, the reason we have a spending deficit is because we already don't have enough money to take. So why are we trying to like, run that math?

[A]

Yeah. Facts. Okay. Yes. Just a funny joke.

[B]

Yeah, I don't want to trig you.

[A]

Move on.

[B]

Second one was J. Wel 92. He said it's Schroed Dinger's money. That's why Schrodinger's moneyer's money. So.

[A]

Oh, my God.

[B]

If you look at the money, then the money's there, but if you don't see it.

[A]

Oh, my God. Wait, who said that?

[B]

Jwoke92.

[A]

Jay. You are. I'm gonna steal that endlessly.

[B]

That was good.

[A]

Please know I won't always remember to credit you, but in your heart, you need to know every time I call it Schrodinger's money that you deserve the credit. And you can just play this clip on a loop. Schrodinger's money. Oh, my God, that's so good. Let's talk about a pattern that is guaranteed to be killing your progress. You know what you need to do? You need consistent nutrition. We all do. You need vitamins, probiotics, greens. We all know that we should be doing more of it. When your morning gets chaotic, you skip it. When you travel, you skip it. When your routine breaks, everything tends to break, and that inconsistency compounds against you every single day. AG1 is designed to solve the execution problem. One scoop 8 ounces of water and you're done. You're getting 75 plus ingredients, vitamins and minerals, pre and probiotics, nutrient dense superfoods. Everything that used to require six, seven different supplements and perfect planning now happens in one drink that takes about 30 seconds to make. Right now, AG1 is giving you $87 worth of free gifts. With your first subscription, you get a welcome kit, travel packs, vitamin D3 plus, K2, and flavor samples. Click the link in the show notes or visit drinkag1.comimpact to claim this offer.