A (4:26)

Well, Sam Harris, who I don't think is usually described as a Trump superfan, did say that Donald Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize for that. So that kind of tells you the scale of the achievement, I think.

B (4:37)

Oh, absolutely. And it was Trump. And it was very interesting because there was an interview with Trump on Air Force One and he paid a lot of. I would say respect is the wrong word. But saying, you know, how it was a team effort, which was very un. Trumpian, actually. You know, saying that Erdogan and a few other people were instrumental in making this happen. So a huge achievement. But then, you know, Hamas being Hamas, turns out you can't trust a genocidal racist death cult. And they just reverted to doing what they know and do best.

A (5:10)

But what I also, like, I say, find interesting, is, like, all the people who were screaming about the genocide don't care anymore. Do you not find that so fascinating? Yeah, isn't that weird? Like, for this entire year, they spent their time banging on about genocide. And the ones on the left now, they've gone back to. They've reverted to the mean, which is now they're banging on about the tax, the rich and billionaires and the retards on the right are banging on about how Charlie Kirk killed himself or Erica Kirk killed him or whatever it is that they're onto now. And you just go, there's been this, like, there is a herd thing going on where people really just. They just follow the crowd and they. They talk about stuff that they don't know much about. And then that thing is still going on, but then they don't talk about it anymore because the new things come up. It's so strange.

B (6:00)

It is, it is. And it just shows a. The power of social media, where if something is constantly put into your feed, then people then go, oh, this must be the thing that everyone's talking about. This must be the most important issue of the day. And look, and let's be honest, it is a very important issue. Israel by the Stein and Gaza and all the rest of it. But then you go, look, if you're so activated by it, which I understand it's a very emotive topic, then you wouldn't have this reaction where the moment it's done in inverted commas, you then go, okay, what's next? You would be genuinely concerned as to what's happening, the fate of the people. Have Hamas actually put down their weapons? Is this ceasefire workable? But it just seems to have all gone, okay, let's move on now.

A (6:52)

It's, it's really, really strange. But of course, one of the other things that happened during the year in relation to Gaza was the 12 day war, when the US bombed Iran and damaged or destroyed their nuclear facilities. You know, there were people predicting it was going to cause World War three. Our recent guest, Dave Smith called President Trump to be impeached. You know, people lost their shit.

B (7:19)

Yeah.

A (7:19)

And ultimately it was kind of an overall success. And that is in some ways a really strong contrast because the Trump administration has delivered a lot in the Middle east while not delivering anything of what they promised in Ukraine. And that's been a really interesting thing to watch. And I think it's partly because of the people involved. It's like Jared Kushner, I think, is really, really talented. And from what I know, he's done an amazing job in the Middle east. Not just now, but with the previous Abraham Accords work they did. Whereas, you know, Steve Witkoff doesn't seem to have the measure of Vladimir Putin just yet, which is, you know, not a surprise because Putin really knows what he's doing and Steve Woff doesn't. But that is another conflict that's yet to wrap up. It's obviously close to my heart, so it's, it's sad to see that we end the year with that war still ongoing. Yeah, it's, it's been a, it's been a year of, of conflict around the world.

B (8:15)

It has been a year of conflict. There was India and Pakistan that flared up for what seemed like three hours. Yeah, three hours. But there was a point, I remember when it started going, this could potentially be disastrous. And it's what we often talk to some of our guests about, which is going from a unipolar world to a multipolar world. And this is, I think the fact what the left, or progressives, or not even the progressives, just the anti interventionists, shall we call them, fail to appreciate the moment America recedes from the global picture, the moment America stops being an inverted commas of world's policeman, that's the moment there's certain nefarious actors are taking a cheeky look around and going, okay, well then maybe we can take this. And maybe we can do this, because this idea that we were all taught at university where, you know, in basic economics, where, you know, if you trade with someone, you know, everything is going to be great, turns out, isn't always true.

A (9:14)

Well, what's interesting, of course, is those two conflicts started under the previous. They started under the Biden administration, and I think they were a response to the weakness of that administration. President Trump came in, he's managed to get some progress on one, not so much on the other, but hopefully next year does bring a proper peace to both of those places.

B (9:37)

Oh, well, look, that's what we're all desperately hoping for, because the, the war, as all wars, but particularly that war, is just so brutal and horrific that you hope that some measure of sanity can be restored. The thing that I find worrying whenever I'm in the United States is this kind of pro Putin rhetoric that comes out where people are saying, well, you know, Ukraine, the skirt was a bit high, therefore she deserved the black eye. And you're like, really?

A (10:06)

Yeah. And they're also, as we discovered in our episode with Ann Coulter, quite famously, because that clip's gone super viral. They're very badly informed. It's just a bunch of talking points that none of them have actually looked into. But the reason they're all doing that, I think, is it's. It's a much better explanation than the real explanation, which is they just don't want. They want to be isolationists. And I, I would just have a lot more respect for those people if they just said, like, we're isolationists, we don't care about Ukraine, we don't care about the Middle East. Like, that at least, is an accurate reflection of their true motivations. Whereas making up all this stuff about. I've always found it very. What's the right. What despicable, really. It's like, why would you make up lies to justify. So that you don't have to say the truth about what you actually believe. Just say, I'm an isolationist. I don't want America involved in foreign affairs. And then that is a legitimate debate that people can have about what is the role of the west and America as its leader in maintaining world order and so on, or the current world order, if you like. Because if you don't maintain the current world order, a new one will emerge, and that will be a world order in which the west and the United States in particular, are no longer the dominant force. I mean, this was the crux of our debate with Dave Smith a few Months ago, so. Or a month ago, whatever it was. Yeah, right. That was, that was a big part of the conversation. Of course, this was also a year, I think, in which, you know, it's interesting because on the one hand it feels like all of the arguments that people like us and many of our guests have been making for a long time about the culture within Western countries wokeness and all of this other stuff, it really was the year where our arguments started to be dominant. In many ways. You could argue that on many of those issues we've won the arguments. But at the same time, I think the murder of Charlie Kirk, which was a political assassination, it just, it just showed that there is a. A vet. We are living through a very explosive, you know, I'm trying to find the right words. We are living through a very combustible time. There is a lot of people who are very angry. There are a lot of people who've been trained to think that their anger entitles them to do horrific things. And I don't just mean in terms of political violence. I see people within the political world now saying, well, you know, they did this, therefore we're entitled to do that. And Charlie Kirk actually gave a lot of very bad actors, I think on the right, an excuse which we've seen since, to go, well, you know, debate, debate died with Charlie Kirk. And it's such a terrible thing to do to his legacy because this was a man who actually not only operated in the world, but demonstrated through his life and sacrifice the right way to approach these things, which is to argue, to win the argument, which is what he did. Ultimately he was successful because he persuaded people and he became undeniable in that. And his murder was tragic, but in many ways it only proves his point. And I think one of the things that has happened since is way more people have now come over to the side of rational discussion. But it's also, of course, given a lot of bad faith actors ammunition to do terrible things well.

B (13:44)

And this is the dispiriting thing about. I mean, obviously the murder was awful. But then like with all of these types of events, I think it was Douglas Murray who said it best. He said it sends a flare into the sky and then you can see where everyone really stands. And the people who have integrity and principle on either side behave with integrity and principles. And the people who have neither. And more pertinently, the incredibly bad faith actors who then use a tragedy in order to enrich themselves behaved in that manner as well. And I mean, the obvious answer most pertinent example of this was is Candace Owens. Her behavior after Charlie's murder is, let's be honest, it's been despicable.

A (14:31)

She's become a lunatic. She's such a lunatic that Nick Fuentes is calling her out.

B (14:36)

Yeah, yeah. And what makes it, what makes her behavior and her actions even more heinous is this is somebody who had a personal relationship with Charlie. This is somebody who was a friend, yet uses the death, the murder of her friend, so called friend to then spread misinformation, to then spread conspiracy to, and then become even richer as a result of it. And the thing is with Candace's behavior is it's been, it's despicable, but it's more understandable if you don't have money, if you're trying to make it. It's not acceptable in any shape or form, but it's more understandable. But you go, you already huge, you already have all the money that you need, the notoriety, and yet you still carry on down this path. That to me makes it even more heinous.

A (15:25)

It is, it's just, and it's interesting, you can see lots and lots of people turning on, on that, on this issue and just going like, this is crazy, this is insane. But, but, but there is, there's a lot of that going around now. And people are just throwing stupid and crazy stuff out because they can. And the other thing they're doing very dishonestly and Tucker does this, Tucker Carlson does this all the time. Is he deliberately conflates being criticized for the stupid and wrong and factually incorrect things that he says with people trying to cancel him. You're just going, no, no, no, no, no. You have a right to express your opinion. And we will defend your right to express your opinion, but we will also defend our right to criticize your stupid opinion. And he keeps saying all this stuff about how Hitler didn't really want to dominate Europe. Like Hitler is on record saying that he wanted to dominate Europe.

B (16:22)

I think he was pretty clear about that, mate.

A (16:23)

Yeah, he was. He seemed to be quite determined, actually. Yeah, yeah.

B (16:26)

Both in word and action.

A (16:28)

Yeah. But it speaks to a thing. And Jimmy Carr on an episode that went out recently which is absolutely crushed. I mean, he made the point that the founding myths of the west in the last 70 odd years are crumbling. I do think that's true. And I think it's partly because in recent decades the progressive left just ran away from reality and started calling everyone a fascist and everyone a Nazi and they diluted it to the Point where you no longer can use those terms as accurate descriptions of people who are those things. Nick Fuentes, for example, is a Nazi. That's just a fact he doesn't deny. He himself says that Hitler was cool. Right. Like there is a word for that.

B (17:11)

Yeah.

A (17:11)

And that's what he is. But because the left destroyed that term as far as they have, it doesn't really have the impact that it once did. And all of these things are now being renegotiated in real time. Which is one of the reasons after we had our conversation with Dave, we invited Nick on the show and like Candace before, he's ducked it.

B (17:32)

Yeah, he has. And there was a clip of him going, oh, maybe I will, maybe I won't, maybe I won't.

A (17:38)

And they're not even American.

B (17:41)

Yeah, because the reality, look, the reality is why he's ducked it is because unlike a lot of people who have interviewed him, we're not going to soft soap him mentioning no names. We're not going to get and start telling him how outraged we are and how despicable his words are.

A (17:56)

Just argue the points.

B (17:57)

We just argue the points.

A (17:58)

Which is the kryptonite for people like him. Yeah, because what he feeds off is people being outraged by his horrific views. We'll just dismantle his horrific views. And that's what he's afraid of because all he's good at is playing the stupid character to his audience. What he's actually terrible at is engaging in the argument because there is no argument to support the points that he's making. Something we've learned doing this show is that people's thoughts about a given issue often depend on where they get their news. That's why we use Ground News to see how the same story is reported across the political spectrum.

B (18:33)

For example, take the story about Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signing an executive order creating so called ice free zones. Follow along at Ground News trigonometry using Ground News straight away, we can quickly see that the story is being covered by sources across the board. But with more coverage from outlets on the right. Scrolling down the page, Ground News allows us to easily compare the headlines. We can see the Chicago Sun Times, which is on the left, focused on the city's decision to declare municipal buildings ice free. Meanwhile, the Hill, a centrist newspaper, simply stated that Chicago's Mayor signs Ice Free Zone executive order. But the New York Post on the right went with White House blast Sick Chicago Mayor for aiding illegal immigrant killers. Same news story, completely different, takes Ground News compiles these divergent perspectives in one place.

A (19:30)

Another feature we use heavily at Trigonometry is the blind spot feed, which highlights where coverage is lopsided, lets you compare bias across the political spectrum, and shows what's being emphasized or ignored. If you care about getting to the truth by seeing things from all angles, ground news is essential. Go to Ground News, slash trigonometry, and get 40% off their unlimited vantage plan. That's the plan. We use that link again is ground news trigonometry.

B (19:59)

And it's also as well, it's going. Okay, so you are putting yourself forward as the leader of this movement. What's your grand vision? What do you want from the West? You talk openly about how much you despise women and how terrible they are and. All right, well, yeah, but you need women in order to have babies for the moment. And how we gonna.

A (20:20)

I don't think he's worked that part out.

B (20:22)

Yeah, yeah, well, maybe, yeah, but you also need women in order to have children, in order to keep the west going. And in order to have children, most of the time you need stable marriages, you need healthy relationships. That's how you build a healthy, functioning society. We've spoken about it on the show time and time again that one of the major issues with the west is fatherlessness, the breakdown of the marriage, and in the younger generations, the fact that both males and females have a distrust of each other and they're not relating to one another as they used to before. Well, Nick, is this your grand vision? Like, basically saying that women are disgusting and stupid? How is that going to make anything better?

A (21:07)

Well, I don't think people like him, and there's previous iterations of him obviously, as well. And you see this on the left as well. I think what we have with the Gen Z generation is a lot of very understandable anger. And I did a live show with Andrew Gold at a theater in London, and one of the guys who came up to me at the book signing before the show, he said, I've got a teenage son and a teenage daughter, and I'm trying to pull my teenage son in from going to the right too far. And I'm trying to pull in my teenage daughter from going too far to the left. And that's kind of the. The society. I refuse to accept a world in which our daughters vote for Zoran Mamdani and Zach Polanski. And our sons are watching Nick Fuentes and Bonnie Blue.

B (21:56)

Yeah.

A (21:56)

Separately not together, because that would be great content. You know what I mean? But that is in terms of the influences that are prominent, that is the world we're heading in. And it is because people of that generation in particular, alienated. They're angry, let's be honest. And we talked about this, I had a video on this, talking about the. The phenomenon of. Of Nick Fuentes. But more broadly it's like. And we. Our conversation with Nick Fus, the main interview hasn't had huge numbers, but some of the clips are like the millions and millions and millions of views. Because what he's saying is true. Young men, add to that white man, add to that Christian man, particularly in America, they have been demonized for things that they were neither responsible for nor benefited from. And they were told, you're a piece of shit, you've got male privilege, you've got white privilege, you've got this privilege. When they actually didn't, they lived in a society that was obsessed with promoting women and actually just openly, callously, maliciously negligent of men's need for respect and opportunity and purpose and all these other things. So that anger that exists in, in the young generation is totally justified. Absolutely, it's totally justified. But the question is, can they learn what all of us have to learn during the course of our lives, that when you are angry, that's good because you can channel that anger into positive action, creating something, building something, uniting people. Charlie Kirk was so widely revered and respected even by many people who didn't share his views because that was the approach he took. Coalition building, having a huge impact in electoral politics, actually channeling things into productive action. That is, I think, where this thing needs to go. And that is a battle. I think that's the next battle. If we've won the arguments on wokeness and net zero and illegal immigration, etc. Which I think we have at this point, let's be honest, even in Britain we have then that culturally that is the next big battle.

B (24:07)

I agree with you. I think what's really important when talking about the Fuentes is and the people on the right and there's Polanskis and people on the left, what they do is they activate, in my opinion, the very worst of the male brain and the very worst of the female brain. And there's also the economic element where people feel that they have no hope, that if they get a job they're not going to be able to buy a place. The economy is becoming more and more degraded, it seems, year on year. Not only that, infrastructure is crumbling, hopelessness, anger, resentment. So you've got these two people who are basically Saying, let's throw the board game up in the air. And look, on the one hand you go, that can be a visceral thrill, a rush. We saw it in 2020. You break something, you feel as if you're doing something, you feel as if you're sticking a finger to the man. But it's like when during the Brixton riots of the early 80s, where a lot of people, the Caribbean community came out, they were very angry. They had many reasons to be angry. You smash up your own, the place where you live. Well, all right, you smash up the place where you demonstrate your anger, but then what you're left with, you look around your area, you go, all the businesses are broken. People have lost their jobs. People have been up, you know, people have lost their livelihoods, their jobs, their businesses. Everything's in ruins. Eventually, you are going to have to build it back up again, unless you want to live in a ruin. And that's a choice we're all facing. Do you want to go down these paths? Because I'm telling you on that side, you don't want to end up there. And from my personal, and you've got experience of it as well, on the far left, it doesn't end well either. Or are we going to actually go, you know what? Things aren't great. We're in a really tough situation societally, economically, culturally. And are we gonna do the frankly immature thing of throwing the board, going up in the air and having a big tantrum about it, even though it ain't fair? Or are we gonna actually work together and figure out a way for us to live in a far more harmonious way and try and do our best to fix the problems we have in society? Cause to me, that's the option. Not that.

A (26:28)

Well, right? And anger is addictive, and the righteous anger that people like is why a lot of people argue about these terms. But the woke left, this is what it was about, giving you an excuse to be angry and unconstructive. And whatever is happening, the equivalent on the right, call it woke, right? Don't call it woke or whatever. It's exactly the same. It's basically a bunch of people channeling people's anger into money and clicks for themselves. Because that's all that's happening, right? Let's be honest, Nick Fuentes, if you're one of his viewers, he's not taking you to a better place. He's not trying to make a better America, and he won't. And likewise with all this other stuff. So, yeah, and that's the challenge, because ultimately you're gonna have to build things. And it's interesting because in the US of course, the Trump administration is doing many of the things that people elected him to do. They're closing the border. They are doing their best, as we discussed, to end global conflicts. They are rebuilding America's manufacturing base. They're doing lots and lots of things to reset America's relationship with the world and with itself. And here in the uk, I think it's fair to say that the arguments on things like illegal immigration, the arguments probably on mass immigration in general, and the argument on just the cultural disintegration of the country, the crime, all of that stuff, they've been won. Everyone agrees with us now. All the stuff we've been saying and people have pretended we're right wing for saying. Now those very people are coming over to our side because frankly, the country's got to the point, particularly the economic situation is really bad. But it's going to be a while before that turns around politically because there's not a scheduled election for the next three years. Unless there's the fiscal crisis that Alistair Heath predicted on our show in the next couple of years or the beginnings of one, which leads to an early election, we're kind of stuck in the situation for a few more years. And there's a few luxury beliefs that we have yet to let go. Net zero is one of them. There's still a lot of people who don't realize that it's economic suicide for no gain whatsoever. And the other one is, and this is what no one talks about, and I mean no one up to and including reform, is the gigantic, unaffordable welfare bill that we have in this country, that as long as we continue to spend more money than we have and then we earn, we will remain poor, which is what we are. And I know so many people, but in our space, but also in the business world and elsewhere, they're not leaving. They've left. They've left for Australia, they've left for America, they've left for the Middle east, they've left for the uae, Dubai, we are bleeding. There is a giant brain drain going on in Britain that people, some people don't realize is happening, but it is happening. And that if you think about the scale of that achievement, to get hundreds of thousands of talented, creative, entrepreneurial risk takers to leave a country like Britain, you really, really, really had to run it into the ground. And that's where we've got to.

B (29:47)

Well, and this is the worry for me is that we have the politics of resentment where we have, you know, the evil billionaires and millionaires and you can, we can have a conversation about tax, we can talk about that, the tax burden, et cetera. But the reality is those are the people who create wealth. They're the people who pay the majority of the taxes in this country. They're the people who actually keep the public services running. You get rid of them, you demonize them, well, that's fine, but then what are you going to do when they leave and they're leaving in their droves and they're not just leaving. The next generation of millionaires, the next generation of wealth creators, the next generation of business owners are leaving because you have made it untenable for them to live in this country. We've got a 60% tax rate. Once you get start earning a six figure salary. And the people on the left will be going, oh, boo hoo, boo hoo. All right, what about your consultant? You found a tumor in your neck. You're going to go and see your consultant, your oncologist. He's on a six figure salary, but if he goes to Australia, he can triple his salary. If he goes to America, he can quadruple it. If he can go to Dubai, he can earn whatever. How? Triple it.

A (30:59)

Pay no tax.

B (31:00)

And pay no tax. So what do you want your consultant to do? Do you want him effectively to be on a third or even a quarter of what he could earn globally when he's got, probably got a family and he's got to pay school fees? I know. They got a private school. It's terrible. It's not, but whatever.

A (31:17)

Why is it terrible? It's saving government money.

B (31:18)

Oh, yeah, I know, I know. And yeah, and that's. It was a joke, but yeah, but they're not involved in the state school system. And you go, you are forcing all those people out, the talented, and you're.

A (31:34)

Bringing in 55,000 illegal immigrants a year at the same time.

B (31:37)

And you go, we cannot keep going down this path. And if we do, we are going to end up somewhere where no one wants to be ultimately.

A (31:48)

And one of the reasons I say we've won the argument is you've got the Home Secretary of this country, Shabana Mahmood. Yeah, I mean, she sounds like, you know, Powell at this point. I saw an article the other day saying that they're going to deport the children born in Britain who, who are born to illegal immigrants. They will deport them with their parents, which, if Nigel Farage had said that five years ago, they would have crucified him. So it's an extraordinary thing that's happening in that, like, they're no longer pretending that illegal immigration is. People are concerned about it because of racism, because you can't pretend that anymore. And more and more, everywhere we go now, we have people coming up to us going, thank you for what you're doing. Keep up the good work, etc. So, you know, in some ways, in the course of this year, I've said repeatedly that I'm. I've become an accelerationist. And I don't mean that I want the transition. You know, we had this conversation with Jimmy Carr. He sort of meant by acceleration as he meant that you want things to happen super quickly. And that always is quite dangerous. I don't mean quite that. I just mean that I am happy that things have got so bad that people can't pretend that the problem doesn't exist anymore. Because I've concluded that, in my opinion, most people in Britain or in any other country, frankly, they will not wake up and take painful action until inaction becomes much more painful than not acting. And that's kind of where we've got to.

B (33:20)

Yeah, that's exactly where we've got to. Where you go, what are we gonna do? What are we gonna do? Because at this point, it just feels like we're on a cliff and we're in the car and, you know the cartoon where you're teetering on the edge, but the problem is we're teetering far more that way than we are that way. And eventually we're gonna flip over and the car's gonna fall into the ravine.

A (33:43)

Yeah.

B (33:44)

And it's just a matter of time before we go. Are we actually gonna wake up and start looking and taking painful yet necessary action to, let's be honest, save our country? Because that's where we are now.

A (33:58)

That's where we are.

B (33:59)

Or are we just going to be continually oblivious and maybe even with these disastrous tax policies, put our foot on the accelerator?

A (34:09)

Well, we will see, obviously, over the course of the next year. I mean, next year is going to be fascinating in that respect, because the economic troubles that. That we've been concerned about on this show for a while, they may or may not materialize next year, but they could, and that would obviously change everything overnight. So. And then, then you come to the political side of a reformer currently leading in the polls. They've been doing well for this entire time. And it feels to many people, like whenever that Election happens, they are likely to win. You know, it's very early days, but then you go, you know, what about Nigel? We've had Nigel on the show, Nigel Farage a number of times. I was asked, actually, the Telegraph did an interview with me for a profile thing and they asked me, everyone wants to ask you about Tommy Robinson and Nigel Farage now. That's what everyone wants to ask. Not you, me. You know what, you know what I mean by that?

B (35:09)

Of course, of course, yeah.

A (35:11)

That's what everyone wants to talk to us about. And they said to me, what do you think of Nigel? I just said, I like him. I've always liked Nigel, actually, in terms of. As a person, I've always liked him. And one of the things I've always really liked about is he's very forthright. He says what he thinks on the vast majority of things directly. But the question is, has he got the money to win the next election? Has he got the candidates to win the next election? That's something I've asked him repeatedly and hopefully we'll have him on again in the new year. And the third thing is, if he does get elected, can he actually do the thing? Because nobody knows, with all respect to Nigel, who, like I say, I really like him, but nobody knows whether he can do. He's never done anything like that before. He's never run a massive thing like the government, to be fair, neither had Tony Blair.

B (35:59)

Yeah. All his trust.

A (36:01)

All his trust. Or, you know, Boris Johnson, ironically did.

B (36:06)

Yeah.

A (36:06)

He was the Mayor of London, which is about as close as you can get. But if and when Nigel does become Prime Minister, people think. There are too many people who think that will be the answer. He's elected and then everything is solved. He's got a gigantic job on his hands if he is, in fact elected. Gigantic. And it's not going to be easy, it's not going to be pleasant, it's not going to be popular at times. It is going to. Some of the things they're going to need to do are going to be deeply unpopular as well. And that is hard. It's. It's. Look, I, I people. There are a lot of people left and now on the right who want to criticize Nigel Farage and they say, oh, he's just in it for the. This or this. This guy was standing against the European Union and, like, losing his deposit 25, 30 years ago, whenever it was. He's clearly a man who stood up for his principles. But there's still a difference between being a public figure and expressing your opinion and standing as a politician and running a huge thing, much of which by the way hates you, thinks you're evil and wants to sabotage your agenda.

B (37:22)

And that's a civil service.

A (37:23)

And that's the civil service. Now that is a huge challenge which several people we've had on the show like Boris Johnson, like Steve Hilton who was the advisor to David Cameron, Liz Truss will tell you the same. It it's impossible to deal with they found so you've got a that's a huge job.

B (37:45)

You're tuned into trigonometry right now because you want the truth, not someone else's pre packaged version of it. That is exactly why Free Spoke exists. It is a search tool for people who value independent thought and are tired of Big Tech deciding what we can and cannot see. Free Spoke shows you coverage from left leaning centrist and right leaning outlets clearly labeled so you'll always know who is saying what. Explore perspectives lets you compare how different sides frame the same story and podcast snippets gives you unfiltered audio from independent voices and they never track you or sell your data. You can use Free Spoke for free, but Premium is where it becomes transformational. In about 60 seconds you get a full truth foundation on any topic. The premium version gives you unlimited perspective plus breakdowns the full podcast tool so you can jump straight to the exact moment a topic is discussed, an ad free experience, ad blocking inside Free Spoke and still zero tracking or data selling. And when you subscribe you are supporting a company trying to fix the information chaos Big Tech created. Every day I see something online and wonder if it's real or just noise. That's when I pull up Free Spoke in under a minute I know exactly what is actually going on. Try it for yourself. Click the link in the description of this episode or go to freespoke.com trigg to search freely and get the whole picture. Download the app and subscribe for 35% off free spoke premium with our link that is freespoke.com trig and that's I don't think that's what I don't think people understand how having a civil service that is captured or whatever way you want to describe it, that will not implement policies that it does not agree with, how that means that ultimately democracy is compromised because you can vote for whatever party you want to get in on whatever policies they may have, left, right, center, it doesn't matter. But if the people implementing the policies refuse to do so or what they do is then they Drag their heels like a dog dragging itself across the road when you're trying to give it a walk, ultimately you're not going to be able to do the action. And at that point you go, well, we don't really have a functioning democracy.

A (40:15)

Look, the counter argument is you need a civil service because if you change ministers every three months, which increasingly every party does, you have to have some level of continuity.

B (40:25)

Of course.

A (40:26)

Right, but, but we have got very far from the idea that the job of civil servants is to implement the elected, the views of our elected representatives into policy.

B (40:38)

Look, the hint is in the title. You are a servant. What does a servant do? They carry out orders. A servant doesn't go, oh, actually, you know what, I disagree with that because I believe in X, Y and Z. No, that's not your job. Your job is to carry out the instructions of the minister to the best of your abilities.

A (40:59)

Yep. Well, one great hope for reform, I think, is they've got James Orr on board, former guest of ours, good friend of ours. James is like a high caliber human being on every metric. He's a great man, he's a great mentor to young people, he's a great leader, he's incredibly smart, he's incredibly sensible. He is not an extremist by any stretch of the imagination. And he's now heavily involved. They've got Danny Kruger to defect from the Tories. I'm sure next year we'll have more positive things happening for them as well, with his involvement and others, of course. So that's exciting. That's very exciting as a possibility of a party that's actually going to be prepared to do something. Of course we talk about reform. On the other side of the political spectrum, you have the emergence explosion onto the scene of Zach Polanski, which I find simultaneously inevitable and also mind boggling at the same time, because this is a guy who is speaking about stuff that people care about. Of course he is, but, but with, with very little substance as far as I'm concerned, of course.

B (42:15)

But to me, the problem with this and people like Polanski is they're not the problem, they're the symptom, they're not the cause. And part of the cause is the fact that we are economically illiterate as a population. We don't understand economics, we don't understand, we don't even understand basic financial products. You stop the average person on the street, you ask them what APR is, they wouldn't be able to tell you. They wouldn't be able to really tell you how credit cards work. If you buy 100 quid pair of trainers, how much are you going to be paying off every month? And the reason is, is we don't teach people about that. So we're raising this generation of young people who are economically and financially illiterate, which makes them incredibly vulnerable to the nonsense, in my opinion, that Polanski spouts, because it sounds good. And if you don't understand the basics of how a country is run or how a business is run, or how money is made or created or finance and wealth, then of course that's going to sound good. But that is really on the education system and that's on us.

A (43:20)

Yeah, and I think you're absolutely right. And by the way, I don't think we wouldn't want people to take away from this conversation that we think like we always knew everything or even now we know everything, but I just think in the process of a. Having the conversations that we've had with people and educating ourselves about this stuff. And also, you know, there's 12 of us now at trigonometry, we have a team of 10 people working with us. And once you are in that position, you have a responsibility to make that work, to make sure that it works as a business. And in the process, you really understand the Thomas Sowell line of there are no solutions, only trade offs. You're constantly making decisions and we can tell you as effectively a small business what happens when the government jacks up tax rates on small businesses. We will not hire as many people this year as we otherwise would have done. Right. That means that there will be fewer jobs in the country. Now, you multiply trigonometry by a million small businesses, what do you get? There are today millions of jobs that have not been created simply because of the fact that the government is making it harder to run a business. To say nothing of the fact that, look, there are plenty of people like us who've left for other countries. Chris Williamson, our friend, yeah, he's a good example, he moved to America, hasn't looked back. Zubi, who we've had on the show, raised in the uk. I went to school with Zubi, went to university in the uk, started his career in the uk, he's moved to the Middle east and we could go down, business owners, et cetera. So if you do that over a period of 10 years, there are literally millions of jobs in this country that could have existed that do not because of a government policy.

B (45:07)

Exactly. And millions in tax taxable revenue, of course. Millions, no Billions, Billions, Billions.

A (45:14)

Billions and billions and billions because of just that. Because of this idea that anyone who's financially successful is a bad person. Yeah, but that's what. That's basically the Zach Polanski message. And I had one of his people when I went to cover the protest in Crowborough. We didn't put it in the main thing. Cause we just thought it would distract. But people can find the clip. There's a journalist from the Sussex Byline, I think it's called. And I said to him, so, what have you found here? And he basically started banging on about neoliberalism at a protest in which there was just like, families going, we don't want 600 illegal immigrants in a camp in our small town because they're infiltrated. Their brain is rotten with the shit that they've been fed about how. It's the billionaires. We are worried about. The people who fly in on private jets, not the people who come on illegal boats.

B (46:05)

Really?

A (46:06)

Really. Is that you're worried about them, are you? Because that's not who I worry about. Nicking my phone in London. No, that's not who I worry about when I'm walking home at night, late. It's not the billionaire on a private jet. It's not 600 billionaires being moved into a camp in Crowborough. That gives people their concerns. Right. Do I think billionaires should pay taxes? Yes. Do I think they should pay a lot of taxes? Yes. They already do, by the way. And demonizing them further and chasing them out of our country, it's not productive. I'm not a billionaire. I will never be a billionaire. I'm perfectly content with that. I pay a lot of tax. I'm perfectly content with that as well. But the effect of pushing all of this narrative through our society is detrimental. And that's why we're talking about it.

B (46:59)

That is, of course, why we're talking about it. And people go, oh, it's about left versus right when they talk to me. Oh, you say this because you're on the right, or you say this because you're right wing, or you. And I think we both come to this from the similar. From the same point of view. I don't care about left versus right. I care about what works. Because I want my country to be successful. I want everybody to have the best possible chance of shot at making something of themselves, whatever that is. And however you want to live your life, I want it to be the fairest place with the best public services, etc. But we know that these ideas are bad, they don't work. They haven't worked. They've been proven time after time after time not to work.

A (47:46)

And they're not working now.

B (47:47)

And they're not working now. So that's why I push back on them. Not because. And we do not because we're, you know, we hate the left or the left or evil, you know, or any of these things. It's like, no, it's economically disastrous. And when you have policies that are economically disastrous, they are going to impact the poorest the most. That's what happens. That's what happened in Venezuela with communism. Everybody who was rich and had money left, or if they didn't, they stayed and they insulated themselves from the catastrophe as best they could, which is the same thing that's going to happen here. And that's all we care about. Does it work? If it works, brilliant. Implement it. If it doesn't, because it's a crap idea, don't do it.

A (48:33)

Yeah. It'll never take on, mate.

B (48:35)

No.

A (48:36)

And on that happy note, it's been a pleasure doing this for another year with you.

B (48:41)

Absolutely.

A (48:42)

With our amazing supporters. It's been a great year. You know, I always tell this story, I don't think. I'm not sure if I've told it publicly about the girlfriend you had. When we first started this, whenever we used to complain about the state of the world and get upset or this was happening and she would just go, look, guys, everything that's bad for the world is good for trigonometry. And I'm afraid to say we've had.

B (49:04)

A great year and next year is probably going to be even better.

A (49:08)

You know, it's weird, but I, I do feel like we are starting to make, like I said, winning the arguments. That's where you start. Then it has to take political shape. I mean, that's what happened in the U.S. the election of President Trump is a consequence of the fact that the arguments were one. Right. So we, hopefully that will happen here over time as well. We're going to keep doing our best to, to talk to people, have debates. We haven't even talked about some of the great interviews we've done this year, whether that's Deborah Francis White, that, that debate or lots of other things that have been fun or crazy or wacky. We've still got some amazing episodes to come out from our America trip, but it's been, it's been a great year. We thank everybody for supporting us for seven and a half years now. That's how long we've been going.

B (49:55)

It's been. It's been a hell of a trip. It's been a hell of a journey, and I loved every minute of it.

A (50:01)

We're gonna kiss.

B (50:02)

We are gonna kiss. But that's only for substack, so check us out there. But the exciting thing is, is what we've got coming in, they're coming down the pipeline. The new ideas we're gonna be implementing, the new content that we're talking about, I'm already excited about. Now, the guests that we're gonna get, they're gonna be even bigger. They're gonna be even better. So I can't wait for 20, 26. And we're gonna see what the world is gonna bring us. I'm sure it's gonna be delightful.

A (50:28)

Merry Christmas, everybody.