True Crime Obsessed – Episode 405: Web of Death: California Dreaming

Release Date: December 5, 2024

In this compelling episode of True Crime Obsessed, hosts Julian Benzovalli and Patrick Hines delve deep into the harrowing true crime story featured in Web of Death's fourth episode, titled “California Dreaming.” This detailed, long-form summary captures the intricate discussions, emotional narratives, and significant breakthroughs surrounding the case of two unidentified Indigenous women whose lives were brutally taken in 1980.

1. Introduction to the Case

The episode opens with the hosts introducing the focus of their discussion: a cold case from 1980 involving two young Indigenous women found murdered in Ventura and Kern counties, California. These victims were initially identified only as Jane Doe, Kern County Number 5, and Jane Doe Ventura.

2. The Initial Discovery and Investigation

In July 1980, law enforcement discovered the first victim in an almond orchard off Highway 99. Detective Steve Rhodes, a seasoned cold case detective from the Ventura County District Attorney's office, emphasizes his unwavering dedication to seeking justice for victims:

"We need to complete an identification and then find family members and notify them about the death." – Violet Suze [04:22]

The autopsy revealed that the woman had been stabbed over 28 times, with a blood alcohol level of 0.3, indicating extreme intoxication. Despite meticulous evidence collection, including a beer bottle, a pack of cigarettes, and tire tracks, the lack of DNA technology in the 1980s rendered the case nearly unsolvable.

3. Violet Suze’s Quest for Justice

Violet Suze, a central figure in this narrative, shares her personal connection to the case. Her aunt, Shirley, went missing at a young age, prompting Violet to vow to find her. However, systemic neglect and racial biases hindered her efforts:

"We're just told, oh, probably just another dead Indian. That's what I was told. We were looked at as if we were nothing." – Violet Suze [14:21]

The hosts highlight the profound impact of intergenerational trauma stemming from the residential school system, which forcibly removed Indigenous children from their families and eroded their cultural identities.

4. Advancements in DNA Technology and the DNA Doe Project

Fast forward to the early 2000s, advancements in DNA technology and the establishment of the DNA Doe Project revolutionize the investigation:

"You cannot dispute DNA evidence. You just can't." – Dawn Ratliff [02:06]

Detective Steve Rhodes capitalizes on these advancements, utilizing genetic genealogy to reopen and reinvestigate the 1980 cases. The implementation of Governor Schwarzenegger's Proposition 69 in 2005, mandating DNA collection from felons, significantly bolsters the ability to link evidence to suspects.

5. The Role of Genetic Genealogy

In collaboration with Gina Rather from the DNA Doe Project, the investigation leverages genetic genealogy to identify unknown victims and perpetrators. Gina explains the methodology:

"The founders realized that the same methods used to identify birth parents for adoptees could be used to identify John and Jane Does." – Gina Rather [38:01]

Through meticulous analysis and community outreach, particularly within Indigenous Facebook groups, the team uncovers crucial leads that ultimately lead to the identification of Shirley Suze as Jane Doe, Kern County Number 5.

6. Emotional Resolution and Continuing Efforts

The identification of Shirley brings immense emotional relief to Violet and her family:

"I kept my promise. I found her." – Violet Suze [48:24]

Despite this breakthrough, Jane Doe Ventura County remains unidentified, highlighting the ongoing challenges in closing all related cases. Detective Steve continues his unwavering commitment to identifying and bringing closure to the families of these victims.

7. Broader Implications and Continuing Struggles

The episode underscores the broader issue of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW), emphasizing the systemic neglect and ongoing violence faced by Indigenous communities. Violet participates in marches advocating for awareness and systemic change, reflecting the persistent struggle for justice:

"We need people to be made aware that this is actually still happening." – Violet Suze [36:42]

8. Conclusion: The Human Impact of Cold Cases

Julian and Patrick reflect on the human aspect of these cases, acknowledging the emotional toll on families and the crucial role of determined investigators like Detective Steve and advocates like Violet Suze. The episode serves as a poignant reminder of the importance of persistence, technological advancements, and community support in uncovering the truth and delivering justice for victims who have long been forgotten.

Notable Quotes:

• "You cannot dispute DNA evidence. You just can't." – Dawn Ratliff [02:06]
• "We're just told, oh, probably just another dead Indian. That's what I was told." – Violet Suze [14:21]
• "I kept my promise. I found her." – Violet Suze [48:24]
• "We need people to be made aware that this is actually still happening." – Violet Suze [36:42]

Key Moments:

• [02:06] Discussion on the irrefutability of DNA evidence.
• [14:21] Violet Suze articulates the systemic neglect faced by Indigenous communities.
• [38:01] Gina Rather explains the DNA Doe Project's mission and methodology.
• [48:24] Emotional confirmation of Shirley Suze's identification.

Conclusion:

“California Dreaming” is a testament to the relentless pursuit of justice against formidable odds. Through heartfelt storytelling and insightful analysis, True Crime Obsessed sheds light on the dark realities faced by Indigenous women and the heroes who tirelessly work to bring their stories to light. This episode not only illuminates the specifics of a cold case but also underscores the broader societal issues that perpetuate such tragedies.