Did the Government Kill Martin Luther King Jr.?

Summary

---

Truer Crime — “Did the Government Kill Martin Luther King Jr.?”

Host: Celisia Stanton
Release Date: January 19, 2026 (MLK Day re-release)

---

Episode Overview

In this probing episode of Truer Crime, Celisia Stanton tackles the enduring and controversial question: Was the U.S. government involved in the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.? On the anniversary of the civil rights leader’s death—and in light of ongoing state violence—Celisia reexamines official narratives, uncovers buried trials, and asks why so many questions about that fateful day in Memphis have yet to be answered. Drawing parallels between the 1960s and present-day America, she encourages listeners to resist accepting sanitized history and to keep questioning.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. The Vulnerability and Foresight of Dr. King — The Final Days

• King’s anxiety and threats: In the days leading up to his assassination, King faced increasing threats, including a bomb scare on his flight to Memphis (5:00).
• Mountaintop Speech (07:25): King's prophetic words the night before his assassination echo his sense of imminent danger.
  • “I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight that we as a people will get to the promised land...” (07:25)

2. Official Narrative: The Case Against James Earl Ray

• Main elements of the prosecution's case:

  • Rifle and fingerprints found near the scene (09:05).
  • Ray’s fugitive status, timeline, and confession.
  • “Case closed, right? Well, not quite.” (10:13)

• The King family’s doubts:

  • The 1997 prison meeting between Dexter King and James Earl Ray:
    • Dexter King: “Did you kill my father?” (10:23)
    • James Earl Ray: “No. I didn’t.” (10:25)
    • Dexter King: “I want you to know that I believe you, and my family believes you.” (10:28)

3. The 1999 Civil Trial — The Forgotten Verdict

• King Family v. Government Entities:

  • Coretta Scott King and family sued stating a conspiracy involving local, state, and federal agencies (12:50).

  • The jury, after a three-week trial and hearing from 70 witnesses, found the government to be part of a conspiracy—deliberating for just an hour (13:30).

  • Coretta Scott King’s statement:
    “This verdict is not only a great victory for my family, but also a great victory for America and a great victory for truth itself.” (13:51)
    “The jury was clearly convinced that a conspiracy of the Mafia, local, state and federal government agencies were deeply involved in the assassination of my husband.” (14:03)

• Media silence and public ignorance:

  • The trial received minimal media attention, and few Americans know about its outcome (12:30–14:30).

4. The Sidelining of King's Security in Memphis

• Security detail disbanded:
  • On King’s final trip, his usual all-Black police detail was replaced and then disbanded (16:50).
  • Two Black firefighters were also abruptly reassigned from the firehouse overlooking the Lorraine Motel (18:30).
  • Detective Ed Redditt was removed from his surveillance post due to claims of a threat against him—later determined to be unfounded (20:09).
  • Celisia’s reflection:
    “But it is weird, isn’t it, that King was casually left unprotected while the Secret Service seemed willing to pull out all the stops for a random police detective?” (23:18)

5. Challenging the Official Case Against Ray

• Background on Ray:

  • Petty thief, escapee, but no history of violence or white supremacist ties (24:48).
  • Ray’s claim: “Raul” orchestrated events—including purchasing the murder weapon and checking Ray into the boarding house (26:52).
  • Ray’s own lawyers believed in his innocence (26:36, 30:13).

• Plea deal under coercion:

  • Ray switched lawyers to Percy Foreman, who pressured him into pleading guilty—possibly as part of a broader effort to suppress a public trial (30:48–32:15).
  • Later, Foreman was indicted for a similar coercion/racketeering case, supported by large bribes from powerful individuals (32:15).

• Problems with the evidence:

  • Main eyewitness, Charlie Stevens, was intoxicated at the time and unreliable (35:35).
  • Ray’s alibi was supported by withheld FBI evidence, placing him away from the scene before the shooting (36:04).
  • The rifle could not be definitively matched to the fatal bullet, and the only forensics were circumstantial (38:50).

6. The Alternate Theories — Mafia & Local Conspiracy

• Jim’s Grill and Lloyd Jowers:

  • Eyewitness Betty Spaitz saw owner Jowers with a smoking rifle moments after the shooting, dirty knees, and acting panicked (41:20).

  • Jowers, on ABC in 1993, admitted he knew who was paid to kill King (42:24).

    • Sam Donaldson: “Did James Earl Ray kill Dr. Martin Luther King?”
    • Jowers: “No, he did not.” (42:24)
    • Sam Donaldson: “Do you know who killed Dr. King?”
    • Jowers: “I know who was paid to do it.” (42:33)

  • Jowers connected the conspiracy to Frank Liberto, a mob-connected Memphis businessman, and to “Raul” (43:00).

  • Jowers later wavered and refused to testify further—but came into unexplained wealth after the assassination.

• Corroborating stories:

  • Multiple witnesses claimed Liberto confessed to orchestrating the killing (49:35–51:00).
  • John McFerrin overheard Liberto, on April 4, telling someone to “Shoot the son of a bitch on the balcony” (51:00).

7. The Role of Federal Agencies — COINTELPRO and the FBI

• Systematic campaign against Dr. King:

  • The FBI (under J. Edgar Hoover) used surveillance, disinformation, and intimidation to undermine King (54:33).
  • Examples:
    • Breaking into his hotel rooms, wiretapping, spreading rumors in the press about his private life.
    • Sent King an anonymous letter urging his suicide (55:49).

• Culture of hostility and fear:

  • King called “the most dangerous Negro in America” by Hoover.
  • LBJ and J. Edgar Hoover were determined to ensure Ray pleaded guilty so the truth wouldn't become public (57:47).

• Money trails and pressure on the defense:

  • Testimony from H.L. Hunt’s assistant about a $125,000 bribe to Ray’s lawyer, Percy Foreman (59:10).
    • “I had a briefcase with $125,000 cash in it… 125,000 reasons why James Earl Ray should plead guilty to killing Martin Luther King.” (59:10)

8. Media Silence and Unresolved Questions

• Official stonewalling:

  • Critical witness statements dismissed because of contradictions—yet the state’s own case against Ray was equally “holey” (61:36).
  • Mainstream outlets described the King family’s findings as “unproven” or “conspiracy,” despite the legal verdict.

• Celisia’s reflection on history and justice:

  • “How are we supposed to trust the same justice system accused of being complicit in King's murder to Deliver us the truth about it?” (61:36)
  • Sanitized narratives about King, focusing only on his peacemaking—ignoring his radical economic vision and the state’s deep hostility—do his legacy a disservice.

---

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “Dr. King didn’t die because he was violent. He died after years of being watched, undermined and framed as dangerous, after the state decided he was destabilizing and no longer worth protecting.” (3:45)
• “If you could stand face to face with the person who took your father’s life, what would you ask?” (10:13)
• “I can’t lead that kind of life. I’d feel like a bird in a cage. There's no way in the world you can keep somebody from killing you if they really want to kill you.” —Dr. King, as quoted by Celisia (16:50)
• “Everything in the US is the trial of the century… But this, this is the trial of the century. And who’s here?” — Lisbon journalist on the lack of coverage for the 1999 trial (12:40)
• “The bullet was consistent with Ray’s rifle, yes, but it could have been fired from thousands of other .30 caliber rifles.” (38:50)
• “When the gavel fell on that 1999 civil trial, it uncovered hard truths. But the silence that followed revealed a country still reluctant to confront them.” (61:36)
• From J. Edgar Hoover’s assistant Paul Leterski:
  • “I hope the son of a bitch doesn’t die, because if he does, they’ll make a martyr out of him. Those are his exact words, and I’ll never forget it.” (60:41)

---

Timestamps for Important Segments

• King’s final speech (“Mountaintop Speech”): 07:25–07:54
• Dexter King meets James Earl Ray in prison: 10:23–10:43
• Introduction & summary of the 1999 civil trial: 12:50–14:33
• Disbanding of King’s security & suspicious law enforcement decisions: 16:50–20:22
• Ray’s background and shifting legal defense: 24:48–32:15
• Problems with prosecution’s evidence: 35:35–38:50
• Jowers’ confession on ABC’s Primetime Live: 42:24–42:33
• Community testimony linking Frank Liberto to conspiracy: 49:35–51:00
• Deep-dive on COINTELPRO and FBI anti-King operations: 54:33–55:49
• H.L. Hunt and financial pressure on Ray’s defense: 59:10–59:41
• Celisia’s reflections and the episode’s conclusion: 61:36–end

---

Host’s Closing Reflections

Celisia encourages listeners to honor King’s true legacy—which includes agitation, radicalism, and the pursuit of economic justice—by continuing to “ask questions too soon” and refusing to accept sanitized history. She recommends visiting poorpeoplescampaign.org and listening to The MLK Tapes podcast for further exploration (after 61:36).

---

Takeaways

• The official story of King’s assassination is riddled with unanswered questions, contradictions, and disregarded evidence.
• A 1999 jury found the government guilty as a co-conspirator in King’s death, but this revelation was largely erased from public memory.
• Both King’s life and his death reveal persistent patterns of surveillance, manipulation, and violence against those who challenge entrenched power.
• Asking tough questions about history—and being unsatisfied with easy narratives—remains urgent and important.

---

Transcript

[A]

You're listening to a Tenderfoot TV podcast. You know that feeling when your closet just isn't inspiring you. That's why I've been loving quints lately. Their essentials make dressing easy and actually fun. From Mongolian cashmere sweaters that feel luxe without the designer price to silk tops and skirts that instantly look polished to denim that fits like a dream, Quince has all the staples covered and their Italian wool coats? Absolutely gorgeous. Tailored, soft and meant to last season after season, every piece shows care. The stitching, fabrics and fit all feel high end and the price shockingly good for the quality you're getting. I've been wearing my new cashmere sweater constantly this season. It's so soft, so easy to style. I love just throwing it over my shoulders. And honestly, I can't stop recommending it. Refresh your wardrobe, Quince. Don't wait. Go to quince.com tenderfoot for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's Q U I n c e.com tenderfoot to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince.com tenderfoot beware. Extreme passion can lead to shocking consequences on Scorned Love Kills, the podcast from ID Find out what happens when lust and obsession turn deadly. In each episode, you'll hear direct audio from the hit TV show and uncover true, unexpected stories about love gone wrong, about relationships that become a volatile mix of jealousy and anger. Listen to Scorned Love Kills on Spotify, Apple Podcast or wherever you get your podcasts. Hi friends. I am so excited to share this new episode of True Crime with you. If you want to listen ad free and get early access to all the episodes for this month's case, you can. You can subscribe to Tenderfoot plus at tenderfootplus.com or on Apple Podcasts. It's also one of the best ways to support the show. Hi friends, Today is Martin Luther King Day. It's also been one year since we first shared this episode about the assassination of Dr. King. Before we get into it, though, I want to be clear about something. Today's episode is not the version of this story that most of us were taught. It's not the clean, closed case that you might have heard about in school. It's a deeper look at what happened in the years, months and days leading up to King's death, and at the questions that were quietly buried afterward. I wanted to bring this episode back into the feed because it's not the kind of story that lives comfortably in the past. It's about state violence, it's about surveillance, it's about how certain people come to be framed as destabilizing and what happens when institutions decide that someone is a problem that they no longer want to manage. And if that feels uncomfortably relevant right now, you're not imagining it. I'm recording this from Minneapolis, Minnesota, my home, a city that once again is trying to make sense of a death involving the state, a fast forming narrative and a lot of unanswered questions. A week and a half ago, Renee Nicole Goode, a 37 year old mother, a poet, a neighbor, was killed during an encounter with federal immigration agents here in my city. In the days since, I've watched people across political lines sit with this shared unease. There's grief and confusion and anger and really a sense that we're being asked to move on and accept a government narrative without asking questions. That unease is familiar to me because it's the same feeling I have while researching this episode. Dr. King didn't die because he was violent. He died after years of being watched, undermined and framed as dangerous after the state decided he was destabilizing and no longer worth protecting. What followed wasn't clarity. It was a narrative that made things easier to swallow, even as contradictions and unanswered questions piled up beneath the surface. This episode is about that pattern. So if you've already listened, I'd encourage you to re listen. Especially now. And if you haven't, or if someone in your life is struggling to put words to why this moment feels familiar, I hope you'll share it with them. Not because it offers easy answers, but because it reminds us what we lose when we stop asking questions too soon. Wherever you're listening from, I hope you're hanging in there. Thank you for showing up for this story, for showing up for the questions it asks all of us to consider. Let's get into it. Please note that today's episode includes language some listeners might find offensive, as well as references to gun violence. Please take care while listening. On the last full day of his life, Martin Luther King spent his morning nervously pressed into a narrow airplane seat bound for Memphis. When I first learned this fact, it struck me not for its novelty, but for its ordinariness. There's something, I think, about being strapped inside an 80,000 pound steel bird careening through the sky that seems to level the playing field. At 30,000ft, even the body of a civil rights icon can feel frustratingly fragile. What's less relatable, though, is the gnawing sense of dread that comes with a deeper knowing. If this plane were to go down, it'd be because you were on it before takeoff. King's flight had been delayed not for maintenance or weather, but because a bomb threat targeting him needed vetting. King and the other passengers waited while dogs sniffed through the aisles. When the all clear came, the flight was reboarded. They touched down in Memphis a single hour later than planned. For King, it was just another morning. The dread looming over him had grown larger in the months leading up to this day. From that very first bus boycott in Montgomery, Alabama, more than a decade earlier, King had been a target. But as he expanded his mission from civil rights to economic justice and anti Vietnam War advocacy, he alienated allies and enraged powerful enemies. The threats against him, they'd only grown louder still as King stepped off that plane in Memphis, he knew he had a job to do. He'd come to support striking garbage workers in their quest to form a union. That evening, he stood before a crowd of 2000 and delivered his soon to be famous Mountaintop speech. His voice crescendoed powerfully as he reached his prophetic conclusion.

[B]

I may not get there with you, but I want you to know tonight that we as a people will get to the promised land. So I'm happy tonight. I'm not worried about anything. I'm not fearing any man. My eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord.

[A]

At 30,000ft or right here on the ground, the body of a civil rights icon can feel frustratingly fragile. The next day, at 6pm King stepped out onto the balcony of his room at the Lorraine Motel. Looking over the railing's edge, he spotted Ben Branch, a talented saxophone player set to play at a celebration for the striking workers. Later that evening, Ben King called out, play precious lore tonight. Play it real pretty. It was his favorite hymn, but he'd never hear it again. A loud cracking noise. A single bullet. And that was it. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Was dead. What happened next is a story you might know. A tale repeated on television, across headlines and the history books, that the pursuit of King's killer began immediately.

[B]

Police have issued an all points bulletin for a well dressed young white man seen running from the scene. Officers also reportedly chased and fired on a radio equipped car containing two white men.

[A]

Before long, police would find a rifle out on the street. Next to it, a bag filled with a strange assortment of items. Binoculars, nine bullets, a radio, a pair of pliers, a few beers and a copy of that day's newspaper. As the story goes, fingerprints on the gun matched a man named James Earl Ray, a fugitive who'd escaped prison and been on the run for a year. Investigators learned that Ray had rented a room in a nearby boarding house, one that gave him access to a bathroom with a clear line of sight to King's balcony. Finally, after months on the run, Ray was captured at an airport in London. He pled guilty to King's murder and was sentenced to 99 years in the state penitentiary. So case closed, right? Well, not quite. Because in 1997, nearly 30 years later, Dr. King's son, Dexter King, met with James Earl Ray in prison. And that meeting, it left me wondering. If you could stand face to face with the person who took your father's life, what would you ask? Dexter King had one question in particular.

[B]

Did you kill my father?

[A]

No.

[B]

No, I didn't.

[A]

No.

[B]

I want you to know that I believe you, and my family believes you. And we are going to do everything in our power to try and make sure that justice will prevail.

[A]

Well, now I was listening. Because if James Earl Ray didn't kill King, who did? That's what I was about to find out. This is the story of Dr. Martin Luther King. I'm Celisi Stanton, and you're listening to Truer Crime. Dexter King's meeting with James Earl Ray had not come out of the blue. For years, the King family was suspicious of the official narrative surrounding Dr. King's assassination. And so by 1999, still convinced the full truth had yet to be revealed, Coretta Scott King, alongside her children, filed a civil lawsuit implicating local, state, and federal government entities and. And her husband's death. If the outcome or perhaps even the existence of this trial are a mystery to you, as they were to me for most of my life, I want you to pause and let that sink in. Here's the thing. In 1999, I was just four years old. Now in 2025, I'm mere months away from 30. How is it possible that in the last 25 years, I've never been told the details of a trial where the King family accused the US Government of conspiring kill one of our nation's most celebrated heroes? Sure, I'd heard whispers, the government killed King. A fleeting remark here or there, casually dropped by a friend or relative. Something that always sounded equal parts obvious and conspiratorial. But no explanations ever followed. And I don't think I'm alone in that. While preparing for today's episode, I mentioned this trial to so many People. And the response was almost universal. A knowing nod, widened eyes, and some variation of oh, yeah, I think I heard something about that once. But if we've forgotten the details, it's not entirely our fault. As I discovered in my research, American media barely covered the trial's results, despite its immense significance. One journalist for Lisbon's Daily Publico summed it up perfectly. Everything in the US is the trial of the century. O.J. simpson's trial was the trial of the century. Clinton's trial, trial of the century. But this, this is the trial of the century. And who's here? Still reported or not, In November of 1999, the King family put the US government on trial. Over the course of three plus weeks, 70 witnesses were called to testify. When it was all over, the jury deliberated for just an hour before delivering their verdict. Yes, they concluded the US Government was among a group of co conspirators responsible for the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King. The following day, Coretta Scott King held a press conference. Standing before a cluster of reporters, she addressed the nation.

[B]

This verdict is not only a great victory for my family, but also a great victory for America and a great victory for truth itself.

[A]

The jury was clearly convinced that a conspiracy of the Mafia, local, state and federal government agencies were deeply involved in the assassination of my husband.

[B]

The jury also affirmed overwhelming evidence that.

[A]

Identified someone else, not James Earl Ray, as the shooter in Memphis, and that.

[B]

Mr. Wray was set up to take the blame.

[A]

So what was this overwhelming evidence that Coretta Scott King had found so compelling? And why had I, like so many others, never heard much, if anything, about it? That's what I needed to find out. In the spring of 1968, King felt death closing in on him. Those closest to him said he knew it. You could see it in the way he moved, hear it in the way he spoke. But even if you didn't know King personally, the clues were there. Remember that prophetic warning King gave the day before his death when he'd stood before a crowd of thousands and proclaimed that he might not live to see the future they were all fighting for? It's always struck me that those words feel like the admission of a man who'd spent a lot of long nights reckoning with his own mortality. But also in his position? Wouldn't we all? The threats on King's life weren't just whispered warnings. They were loud, relentless, determined. By the time April 1968 rolled around, those threats had escalated to a fever pitch. Everything seemed to shift into overdrive. When a year before his death, he delivered his controversial Beyond Vietnam speech.

[B]

This business of burning human beings with napalm, sending men home from dark and bloody battlefields, physically handicapped and psychologically deranged, cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice and love.

[A]

His remarks had left a lot of people feeling unsettled. This, some scoffed, was a diversion. No longer just a message of equal rights for black Americans, King was using his immense platform to forward new issues of social justice. He would be slammed in the media for his audacity. Life magazine called the speech demagogic slander, a page of the playbook of the worst sort of communist. Tensions rose. The calls to silence him grew louder. And when King planned his final trip to Memphis, it wasn't just a rally for sanitation workers. It was a step directly into the eye of the storm. Memphis, it turned out, was already simmering. King had visited twice in March, on the 18th and 28th, and each time receiving anonymous threats warning that something would happen to him. I read once that if he hoped to truly understand someone, understand their contradictions, it stuck with me. As I delved deeper, unraveling the threads of King's life, I started to notice his contradictions. Here was a man who resisted the idea of using bodyguards. Yet he was repeatedly gripped by an almost certain fear of his impending mortality. Despite his promises to the crowds of sanitation workers on the evening of April 3rd that he was not afraid, the stress of all those mounting threats had taken their toll on him. He was fearful, yes, but he wasn't stopping. Describing his dislike for personal security, he said, I can't lead that kind of life. I'd feel like a bird in a cage. There's no way in the world you can keep somebody from killing you if they really want to kill you. But whether King wanted it or not, his protection wasn't entirely up to him. The burden fell on law enforcement, and what they chose to do with that responsibility is where today's story starts to unravel. A complete mystery surrounds the decisions made during King's final days in Memphis, one that started to pique my own suspicion as I dove deeper into the case. Take this. When King landed in Memphis on April 3, the day before his death, his usual all black security detail wasn't there to meet him. Instead, a group of white officers escorted him to the Lorraine Motel. And then, just six hours later, that detail was disbanded entirely, leaving King unprotected for the rest of the night and all of April 4, the day of his assassination. Why? No one seems to know. The Memphis Police Department's after Action report offered no explanation. Frank Holloman, Memphis fire and police Director, approved the stand down, but later he claimed he couldn't even remember doing so. He admitted that abandoning security under the circumstances was not proper. Not proper? I thought that sounded like a massive understatement. But here's the thing, the strangeness doesn't stop there, because the night before the shooting, two black firefighters, Norva Wallace and Floyd Newsom, were abruptly reassigned from their positions at the fire station, a fire station that happened to overlook the Lorraine Motel. The reason for the reassignment? Alleged threats against their lives. Later, those transfers were deemed unnecessary. Here's Bill Pepper, the lawyer who represented the King family during their 1999 civil trial, questioning one of those reassigned firefighters.

[B]

How many black firemen were assigned to number two? Just you.

[A]

And.

[B]

We're learning that neither one of you were allowed to be on duty on that bed. Right. And you never received a satisfactory explanation? Not to this day.

[A]

And then there's Detective Ed Redditt. He was a part of King's all black security detail during previous visits, but this time his role had shifted to surveillance, stationed at that same firehouse overlooking the Lorraine Motel to monitor the comings and goings. His job was less about protecting King and more about surveilling him, but more on that later. For now, what you need to know is this. On April 4th, just hours before King's assassination, Reddit was abruptly pulled from his post and taken to police headquarters. At the 1999 civil trial, Redditt described the surreal scene waiting for him back at headquarters, a room filled with top law enforcement officials and a Secret Service agent who claimed he'd flown in from Washington just to share that a contract had allegedly been taken out on Reddit's life. Who takes out a contract on a lowly police detective? Reddit had wondered. And what does the Secret Service have to do with it? Later, the whole ordeal would be brushed off as a mix up. Turns out there hadn't been a threat on Reddit's life after all. But by the time the detective was cleared to return, King was already dead. And look, I'm inherently skeptical of conspiracy theories, the kind of person who usually suspects negligence over malevolence. But it is weird, isn't it, that King was casually left unprotected while the Secret Service seemed willing to pull out all the stops for a random police detective, it was oddities upon oddities. The reassigned firefighters, the disbanded security detail, the removal of Detective Reddit. And yet, after King's assassination, authorities were quick to declare that they had the full story. A rifle was found near the crime scene with fingerprints all over it. The fingerprints of James Earl Ray, that man I discussed earlier. The one who was charged with King's murder. And by June, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover declared Wray a racist with a motive to kill King. So case closed, right? Not even close. Do you have $10,000 or more in credit card debt? Maybe you're even barely getting by by making minimum payments. With credit card debt hitting record highs, National Debt Relief offers real debt relief solutions for people struggling to keep up. These options may reduce a large portion of credit card debt for those who qualify. You don't need to declare bankruptcy and you may be able to pay back less than you owe regardless of your credit. National Debt Relief has already reduced the credit card debt for more than 550,000 consumers. So don't wait. If you owe 10, 20, or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in credit card debt, you can now take advantage of this financial debt relief as the cost of living increases. To find out how much you could save, Visit National Debt Relief.com. that's NationalDebtRelief.com a year from today, what would your dream private practice look like? Would you spend less time chasing claims or only working with clients who value your skill set? What if you had a network to reach out to for questions or free continuing education? What if you had more time for yourself? ALMA empowers you to confidently accept insurance backed by an all in one EHR that simplifies scheduling, documentation and day to day practice operations. With a network of engaged providers and free CE resources, ALMA makes it easy for you to build the practice of your dreams on your terms. Alma believes that when therapists get the support they need, mental health care gets better for everyone. Learn more about [e-mail] get started. Your dream practice is closer than you think. Get started now@hello Alma.com get started.

[B]

Hey Sal. Hank. What's going on? We haven't worked a case in years. I just bought my car at Carvana and it was so easy. Too easy. Think something's up? You tell me.

[A]

They got thousands of options, found a.

[B]

Great car at a great price. Uh huh.

[A]

And it got delivered the next day.

[B]

It sounds like Carvana just makes it.

[A]

Easy to buy your car, Hank. Yeah, you're right. Case closed. Buy your car today on Carvana. Delivery fees may apply. So let's talk about James Earl Ray. The man who, according to official accounts, pulled the trigger that killed Dr. King. To understand his story, you have to Go back to the streets of St. Louis, where Ray grew up during the Great Depression. His family was poor, his childhood unstable, and his education limited. By the time he reached adulthood, Ray had built a criminal record, a string of petty thefts and nonviolent crimes that landed him in and out of prison. In 1959, Ray's life took a darker turn. After his third felony conviction, this time for robbing a grocery store, he was sentenced to 20 years in the Missouri State Penitentiary. But in 1967, after serving less than a decade, Ray managed to escape. He slipped out of the prison in a bread truck and began living on the run, adopting a series of aliases to evade capture. At first, his life on the lam seemed aimless. A restaurant job in Chicago under a fake name, a brief stint in Montreal. And over and over again, Ray managed to evade capture until, of course, he was captured for the murder of Dr. King. Once charged, Ray began working with two lawyers. I'll call the Hanes duo, a father, son, attorney team from Birmingham with a reputation for defending those accused of the most high profile crimes during the civil rights era. The son, Art Haynes Jr. Would say during an interview for the MLK Tapes podcast that Ray was consistent from the very start.

[B]

Did Ray ever demonstrate anything to you to indicate that he wanted to be known as the man who killed King? Why, certainly not. He denied it vehemently from the beginning. He was an escaped con. He didn't care. He just didn't want to go back to the penitentiary.

[A]

I found that interesting. If Ray was so insistent on his innocence, I wanted to know what his story was. This is what I found out. It's during Ray's brief stint in Montreal that his version of events first emerged from the prosecution's. Because it was there, Ray said, that he first met a mysterious man named Raul. Ray claimed that the two had struck up a conversation at a bar and quickly found common ground. Raul, Ray said, was a man of opportunity. He promised Ray travel documents with a simple catch. Ray just needed to run a few errands first. These errands, though they were unusual, they involved Ray smuggling goods across the U.S. canada border and his car. Ray did as he was told, though, and while he claimed to not know exactly what he was smuggling, he was paid for his time. Despite the promised travel documents never materializing, Ray remained hooked, enticed by the promise of a new identity and the allure of a steady, reliable income. So he continued to follow Raul's instructions. Eventually, Ray insisted Raul brought him to Birmingham. And once there, it was Raul. Ray said who gave him $2,000 to buy a white 1966 Mustang, the same car witnesses would describe fleeing the scene of King's assassination. And it was Raul, Ray insisted, who directed him to purchase the rifle in Birmingham that would eventually be linked to King's murder. Ray's version of events is a patchwork of peculiarities. He described meeting Raul the night before the assassination to hand over the rifle he was asked to purchase. The next day, Raul instructed Ray to check into a boarding house near the Lorraine Motel. From the nearby bathroom, Ray could see the very spot where King would later be killed while standing on the balcony. But Ray claimed he wasn't there when the shot was fired. Instead, he said he was headed to a local gas station to see about getting a flat tire fixed. When Ray returned to the area, he noticed chaos. Police cars, flashing lights and news spreading the King had been shot. And then he panicked. Hearing reports that authorities were looking for a white man in a white Mustang, he fled Memphis and began a frantic journey that would take him to Atlanta, Detroit and eventually London. And while I think it's very reasonable to find Ray's story a bit sketchy and super convenient, from the moment he was captured, Ray maintained his innocence. He insisted he was a pawn in a larger conspiracy, a claim that gained momentum when he began working with the Hanes, who insisted that they believed their client was telling them the truth, that the prosecution's case was weak. But then suddenly, just before the trial was set to begin, something unexpected happened when the Hanes went to meet with Ray Artaines Jr recalled the memory for the MLK Tapes podcast.

[B]

We got there and we had bought two suits for him to wear at a trial and ties to go with him. And we were going to take him the suits and buck him up a little bit. On the eve before trial, when we got to the jail, it was spitting snow, it was right cold that night. When we got to the jail, we were handed a note and said, thanks for all you've done, but I've decided to change lawyers. So we, we left. I mean, we were just lawyers. We were lawyers doing our duty.

[A]

That's right. Just before trial, James Earl Ray fired his lawyers. He made a last minute decision to replace the Hanes with a celebrity attorney named Percy Foreman. Foreman, Wray said, had promised to win his case. But things didn't go as planned. Forman quickly began pressuring Wray to plead guilty, or at least that's how Ray described it. The Hanes, too, quickly grew uneasy with Foreman's approach.

[B]

We had Witness statements, outlines of arguments. I mean, we had a complete ready file. He came through Birmingham and we offered him that file. We offered to sit down with him. We offered to outline our defense with him, to give him the witness, state everything that we had. All he wanted to do and all we did was feed him steak and scotch whiskey at the club in Birmingham and hear him ramble on about what a fabulous lawyer he was. Truth of the matter is, Percy Forman was the biggest fraud and blowhard I ever encountered. In over 50 years of practicing law, I saw absolutely no evidence ever, either directly or secondhand, of any inclination or willingness on his part to defend that case as it should have been defended.

[A]

Under the pressure of what Foreman made seem like an inevitable execution, ray folded. On March 10, 1969, he entered a guilty plea, securing a 99 year prison sentence, but avoiding the death penalty. Almost immediately, Ray regretted his decision. He wrote to the judge asking to withdraw his plea, claiming he'd been coerced. But it was too late. The case was closed. The official narrative had been set. And maybe it's all just a sad, unfortunate coincidence, a flaw in the American justice system. Plenty of people who claim their innocence end up taking a plea deal to avoid worse consequences. But what I can't shake is a chilling fact. In 1975, just six years after Ray claimed Foreman had coerced him into pleading guilty, Foreman was indicted for attempting to manipulate another client. The indictment revealed that Foreman had received $50,000 to ensure his client stayed silent. How? By coercing him to plead guilty. So this Foreman thing was interesting. But Ray's story, with its gaps and contradictions, was one that prosecutors were more than content to ignore. This idea that Ray was some kind of pawn in a broader conspiracy was dismissed outright, and the trial never happened. Instead, the state relied on a confession made under questionable circumstances to close the case. But here's the thing. Tennessee law requires the state to present some evidence of Ray's guilt, even without a trial. Perfect. I thought. This was my chance to really understand what they had on Ray, to get a closer look at why prosecutors were so convinced of his guilt. At first glance, I think the state's case against James Earl Ray might seem straightforward. A rifle, fingerprints, a fugitive desperate to stay hidden. But as I dug deeper, the picture blurred and my questions grew. So I want to go through everything the prosecution presented in that case against Ray so you can decide for yourself what you think. Let's start with the witnesses. The prosecution had folks ready to testify that they'd heard the gunshot that killed King, but notably, no one who actually saw the shooter. Their most significant witness was a man named Charlie Stevens. He had been staying at the same rooming house as James Earl Ray, the one that had that bathroom that had the perfect line of sight to King's balcony. An interesting tidbit about that bathroom is that it was actually accessible to multiple people. This wasn't like a bathroom in James Earl Ray's private room. No, actually, it was open to anyone staying at the rooming house. So when the state star witness, Charlie Stevens, claimed that he saw a man fleeing from the direction of the bathroom just moments after the fatal shot was fired, it packed a little less punch than it might have otherwise. And as James Earl Ray's original lawyer, Art Haynes Jr. Described it, Charlie Stevens wasn't necessarily reliable.

[B]

Oh, good gracious. Charlie Stevens was drunk as a goat when Dr. King was killed. We had a taxi driver who was going to testify. Stevens had called a cab, and the cab driver refused to let him in the cab because he was too drunk to ride in a cab. So if your star witness is too drunk to ride in a cab, we felt his testimony was worth nothing.

[A]

And I wondered about James Earl Ray's alibi. If it could be confirmed, it would cast even more doubt on what Charlie Stevens claimed to have seen. Wray insisted that at the time of the assassination, he was driving away from the area to fix a flat tire. His story might have been easy to dismiss, but decades after his conviction, evidence emerged that gave it weight. Bill Pepper, the King family Lawyer in that 1999 civil trial uncovered FBI statements from two men who were near the crime scene on the day of the assassination. Both reported seeing a white Mustang, Ray's car, driving away from the area around 5:45pm that timeline matches Ray's story and places him away from the rooming house 20 minutes before King was killed. And why had this evidence stayed buried for so long? Because the FBI withheld it from Ray's legal team. And why did they do that? Well, we still don't know. But back to the prosecution's case. Next up was their physical evidence. The state pointed to a rifle found near the crime scene, a Remington. 30:06 game master with raised fingerprints on it as a smoking gun. The rifle was found wrapped in a blanket bundle right outside the front door of a local shop. And that's where things get a bit murky. According to the shop's owner, Guy Kneps, he noticed the gun dropped outside his store before the assassination, not after Wray's original lawyer Art Haynes Jr. Would elaborate on the store owner's claims on the MLK Tapes podcast.

[B]

He had no motive or stake in it and truthfully was not particularly excited to be involved. But he was willing to be. You'll see. The fire station overlooks the Lorain Motel. That fire station was packed with city policemen, federal agents, spectators, curiosity seekers, and others who were looking out over the Lorraine Motel to see the activities of Dr. King and his entourage. The moment the shot was fired and Dr. King went down, that fire station erupted like a beehive. Police going in all directions. The very idea that someone could fire that shot, stop in a room very carefully, wrap that package, put the gun in it and tie it, and then drop it is, in our way of thinking, simply preposterous and unbelievable.

[A]

And then there was the bullet itself. While the prosecution implied that there was a definitive match between the fatal bullet and Ray's rifle, the truth was that ballistics could. Couldn't conclusively link the two. The bullet was consistent with Ray's rifle, yes, but it could have been fired from thousands of other.30 caliber rifles. So what are we left with? A rifle that may or may not have been the murder weapon, a key witness deemed unreliable, and an alibi bolstered by evidence the FBI chose to hide. And then there's this. James All. Ray had no history of violence, no known ties to extremist groups, and no clear motive to assassinate Dr. King. An escaped convict, previously found guilty of little more than petty theft, who seemed desperate to stay under the radar, suddenly decided to murder one of the most famous men in America, knowing it would almost certainly end in his capture. For me, it was all starting to feel a little hard to square. So let's humor an alternative for a second. Let's say that Ray wasn't solely responsible. If not him, then who? To find answers, you have to start with Jim's Grill. Located just across the street from the Lorraine Motel, Jim's Grill played a key role in the official narrative of the assassination. The rooming house above the restaurant was said to be the origin of the fatal shot fired from that bathroom window overlooking the motel. But not everyone bought into that explanation. Some believe the shot came from the brushy yard below the window, a spot accessible through the back door of Jim's Grill. And that's where things get interesting. A woman named Betty Spaitz, who worked as a waitress at Jim's Grill, claimed to have witnessed an unforgettable scene that unfolded just moments after Dr. King was shot. Betty, who was also involved in an affair with the grill's owner. Lloyd Jowers recalled seeing Jowers burst through the grill's back door holding a smoking rifle. Years later, she shared her account with Bill Pepper, the King's family's lawyer during the 1999 civil trial. He looked like he had stuck his finger in the socket. Lord Harold was standing up and he looked like somebody had drained all the blood out of his body. He was so white. Oh, he was so right. He had been on his move.

[B]

How do you know he'd been on his knee?

[A]

I know he had been on his move and Pastor Brown with that because what? The ground was damp and his knees was dirty. And when he came in there and went behind the counter and put that gun on the counter, it was a brand new, pretty rifle. The barrel was black, but it was shining like it'd been waxed. The hammer was dark brown. He had this black thing on top of it. Jouer, she said, quickly disassembled the rifle, stashing it on a shelf. And then he turned to her, pale and trembling, and asked, you would never do anything to hurt me, Betty, would you? She assured him she wouldn't. So what did Lloyd Jowers have to say about Betty's story? Well, for years, he denied any involvement, claiming he was busy serving beer when the shot was fired. That is, until 1993, when he appeared on ABC's Primetime Live with Sam Donaldson and made a shocking revelation.

[B]

Did James Earl Ray kill Dr. Martin Luther King? No, he did not. Do you know who killed Dr. King? I know who was paid to do it.

[A]

Lloyd Jowers claimed he knew who was paid to kill Dr. King, but he wouldn't name names. He said he was too scared and didn't have immunity from prosecution. His attorney tried to strike a deal, immunity in exchange for cooperation, but the authorities weren't interested. Still, Jowers and his lawyer met with Dr. King's son, Dexter King, to share what he said was the full story. Jowers claimed he was coerced by Frank Liberto, a Memphis businessman allegedly tied to organized crime. Liberto, he said, used debts and favors to pressure him into letting the grill be used as a staging ground for the assassination. According to Jowers, Liberto handed him a box of produce with cash hidden inside and told him to give it to a man named Raul, the same Raul that James Earl Ray claimed had framed him. Jowers also said that he was told to be at the back door of the Grill at 6:30pm when someone handed him a smoking Rifle. He said he brought the gun inside and hid it in a storeroom. But his most shocking claim, that the fatal shot came from the bushy area behind the grill, fired by a Memphis police officer, a man who, perhaps conveniently, was no longer alive to defend himself. But almost as quickly as the story came out, Jowers began denying it. Despite his meeting with the King family, the authorities remained uninterested and and giving Jowers immunity. And during a 1994 deposition, after being presented with a transcript of his concepts on ABC's Primetime Live, he pled the fifth to every question. Jowers story shifted constantly over the years, a tangle of lies and half truths. He insisted on his innocence, but that didn't square with his confession on ABC were the things he privately had told his attorney. What did stand out to me, though, was that Jowers seemed to come into money not long after King's assassination, money he used to purchase the second largest cab company in Memphis. And while his story wasn't consistent, parts of it align with some suspicious circumstantial evidence. For example, the brushy area behind Drimm's Grill, where some other witnesses reported seeing a man moving just after the shooting was cleared out. The very next morning, Memphis Public works employees inexplicably cut down the bushes, destroying what may have otherwise been a key crime scene. And then there's Betty Spaitz. There were a few other times she had forwarded her same story about Lloyd Jowers less than a year after King's assassination. In fact, she reportedly told two people that her boss, presumably Jowers, was involved in the murder. In one instance, Spaitz allegedly told someone that Jowers was in on it, though she denied saying so when police questioned her later. In another instance, while arranging bail for her brother, she told two bail bondsmen that she knew who shot King and that Ray wasn't responsible. When investigators followed up, though, Spaitz again denied knowing anything. Despite these denials, Betty later came forward with a clear and unwavering account. She told the King family lawyer, Bill Pepper, that she witnessed Lloyd Jowers running into the Grail with a smoking rifle around 6pm on April 4, 1968. And she stood by her statement, even in the face of intimidation and efforts to discredit her. I will not retract the truthful accounts of the events which I witnessed, she said. James Earl Ray was not the person who shot Dr. King. Still, the authorities doubled down on the lone gunman theory, dismissing Speight's and Jowers claims as fabrications. In Betty's case, they pointed to her earlier denials as proof she wasn't credible. But it did make me wonder, was she truly unaware of what happened, or was she just too scared or intimidated to speak out? As for Jowers, they dismissed his story as a ploy for profit, claiming he hoped to make money from a movie deal about the assassination. A movie which, by the way, never got off the ground. But here's what doesn't sit right with me still. Why would Lloyd Jowers, a man who spent years denying involvement, suddenly implicate himself in one of the most consequential assassinations in American history for a movie deal that never even materialized? It feels like a pretty big risk for a pretty uncertain reward. And that's the thing that lingers. Jowers story has its gaps, and so does Betty Speight's, a messy mix of denials and later revelations. But when you step back, aren't those holes about as big as the ones in the case against James Earl Ray? And what if I told you there's also a twist? More evidence that actually lends weight to Jower's version of events. Meet Natural cycles, the only FDA cleared and CE marked birth control app that's 100% natural, hormone free and side effect free. Here's how it works. The app analyzes daily changes in your body temperature to find your fertile window so you can plan or prevent pregnancy naturally. Natural Cycles is a clinically proven non hormonal birth control option that's 93% effective with typical use and 98% effective with perfect use. No synthetic hormones, just science. And if you're ready to start family planning, switching from preventing to planning a pregnancy is as easy as tapping a button. Plus, the Natural Cycles app makes tracking fertility easy. You can measure your temperature trends using an Oura Ring, Apple Watch or our Bluetooth thermometer, which is free when you sign up for an annual subscription. Join over 4 million registered users who are taking control of their fertility naturally. Save 15% when you sign up with code [e-mail] that's radio15 for 15% off today. When Lloyd Jowers claimed on national television that James Earl Ray was a frontman in a larger conspiracy to kill Dr. King, his statement was met with a mix of intrigue and skepticism. When the fuller story came out, he pointed the finger at Frank Liberto, a businessman with alleged connections to organized crime who he said coerced him to take part in the assassination. And as it turned out, Jowers wasn't the only one who thought Frank Liberto had a hand in the murder of Dr. King. Let's start with a woman named Lovatta Addison. Addison owned a pizza parlor near Frank Liberto's business and spent quite a bit of time around him. One day, as a report about King's assassination played on tv, Addison claimed that Liberto leaned in close and said, I had Martin Luther King killed. Addison was so disturbed by the comment that she immediately told her son Nathan Whitlock about it. As Nathan said during the 1999 civil trial, he just couldn't let it go.

[B]

I went directly to Mr. Frank about it when he showed up at the Pitch Bar and just asked him. I said, hey, man, Mr. Frank, you killed Martin Luther King. He glared at me, says, you can talk to your mother, haven't you?

[A]

I said, yeah.

[B]

He said, you wired? I didn't even know what he meant by that. I went, no, I'm not wired. I thought he was talking about if I'm taking amphetamine pills and wired up. I said, no, I'm not crazy. And, you know, he sat there for a second. He says, I don't want to offend anybody by saying this.

[A]

Just say what you.

[B]

He told me. He said, I didn't kill the nigger, but I had it done. And I said, well, what about that other son of a bitch up there taking credit for it? And he says, ah, he wasn't nothing but a troublemaker from Missouri. He was a front man. And I didn't know what that meant because frontman to me means something different than what he was thinking about. I said, a what? He said, a setup man. I said, well, why did you kill the preacher for? He says, boy, you don't even need to be hearing about this anymore. He said, don't you say nothing. He stood up and he acted like he was gonna slap me upside the head. So I stood up there and me and him were looking at each other, and he's got this glaring look on his eye, and I could tell he was thinking about hitting me. And by that time, the phone rang. So I just walked over there and asked for the phone, and I'm busy with the pizza stuff. And I looked up, he's gone.

[A]

But it wasn't just Lovatta Addison and her son, Nathan Whitlock. No, because there was also John McFerrin, a civil rights leader from Fayette county who had his own alarming encounter. McFerrin regularly purchased produce from Liberto and on April 4, the day of the assassination, he overheard Liberto during a heated phone call. The chilling words he caught Shoot the son of a bitch on the balcony. McFerrin was so shaken that he reported the incident to a trusted minister, Reverend Bryant, who would later independently verify the story McFerrin had told him. At the urging of the minister, McFerrin reported what he heard to the FBI, but ultimately they dismissed it. But as the jury and the 1999 civil trial would later conclude, this wasn't just about a handful of men conspiring to kill Dr. King. The US government was implicated, and that's a tough pill to swallow. Why would government entities go to such lengths? Isn't that just some conspiracy theory? Let's take a step back and look at what Dr. King was doing in the months leading up to his assassination. Like we discussed earlier, by 1968, King's activism had expanded well beyond the fight for racial equity. He was challenging the foundations of American power, uniting the poor, opposing the Vietnam War, and demanding systemic change. In December of 1967, King announced the Poor People's Campaign, a multiracial movement that would March on Washington D.C. that summer. It wasn't just about black civil rights anymore. King was building alliances with poor white folks, Asian Americans, Latinos and indigenous people. King saw economic inequality as a shared struggle, one that had long been used to divide and conquer. And of course, there was that infamous Beyond Vietnam speech we discussed earlier. The one where he condemned the Vietnam War as an immoral drain on resources that could be used to fight poverty at home. The backlash was immediate and harsh. By one count, 168 major newspapers condemned the speech. The Washington Post declared that King had diminished his usefulness and the New York Times called his stance wasteful and self defeating. And I think it's important to clarify that the backlash wasn't just media driven. According to a 1966 Gallup poll, 63% of Americans had a negative view of King. It's tempting to think of racism in the 60s as the beliefs of some loud minority. But King's unpopularity tells a different story. Many people in positions of power saw him not as a hero, but as but as a threat. J. Edgar Hoover, the FBI's long standing director, was perhaps King's most vocal detractor. Hoover viewed King as a communist sympathizer and called him the most dangerous Negro in America. He even told reporters that King was the most notorious liar in the country. And so, under Hoover's leadership, the FBI didn't just stand idly by, they sought to destroy King. At the center of this campaign, was COINTELPRO, the FBI's counterintelligence program. Initially created to combat communist threats, COINTELPRO morphed into a dirty tricks operation aimed at discrediting activist groups. King was a prime target. Here's Arthur Murtaugh, one of the agents involved in the FBI's anti king activities, describing his experience.

[B]

I was on a squad that was referred to as a security squad. I would say that probably 98% of the time of the people on that squad was involved in one way or another with the investigation of Dr. King. They also were involved in counter intelligence operations which were designed to make up stories about Dr. King, any kind of a story to denigrate his character and then go to what the Bureau referred to and the Bureau papers referred to as friendly members of the press. I was very ambivalent about what to do. I knew about a lot of this stuff at least by 1955, and it both. I didn't know whether to resign or stay in. One of my brothers said to me, we had a big family, eight of us. He said, art, if things are as bad in the FBI as you say they are, the whole system would crumble. I said, it won't crumble because Hoover has the power to keep it from crumbling. He has everybody scared to death. They do exactly as they tell them.

[A]

An art was right. Following orders, they surveilled King's every move. His phones were tapped, his hotel rooms bugged, and his private life picked apart for anything that could be used against him. Hoover's goal was clear to find dirt that could ruin King's reputation as a moral leader of the civil rights movement. But perhaps the most shocking part of this campaign was the FBI's decision to send King an anonymous letter urging him to kill himself. The letter opened with a harsh accusation. You are a colossal fraud and an evil, vicious one at that. It claimed to have detailed knowledge of King's private life and alleged affairs, even including audiotapes supposedly proving the accusations. The writer gave King a 34 day deadline to take the action before, quote, your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation. The letter ended with a chilling statement. There is only one thing left for you to do. You know what it is. So now that we've laid out just how contentious the relationship between King and the FBI was, let's go back to something I mentioned at the very beginning of this story. Shortly after James Earl Ray was captured, but before he was officially charged, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover publicly declared that Wray was a racist with a motive to kill King. That statement set the official narrative in motion. But Hoover's influence didn't stop there. He had a connection to H.L. hunt, a wealthy oil tycoon and conservative radio mogul. Hunt's radio programs often featured anti King rhetoric, much of it allegedly sourced directly from the FBI. According to Hunt's assistant, John Currington, the two men collaborated frequently, especially after King's assassination. And they had their own reasons for wanting James Earl Ray locked up. Here's Currington speaking with the King family lawyer.

[B]

Bill Pepper, Hoover and Johnson and Mr. Hunt all shared the same view, that if James Earl Ray should go to trial, he could blow everybody out of the boat that was floating around out in the ocean there. So I think, in the opinion of J. Edgar Hoover, LYNDON JOHNSON, and H.F. hUNT, that it was necessary for James Earl Ray to plead guilty to that where none of his testimony would be made public.

[A]

But there's another chilling revelation that Hunt's assistant, John Currington, shared, one that stuck with me. Currington described an afternoon when, after a phone call with Hoover, his boss summoned him to his office. Hunt then made another call, this time to Percy Foreman, James Earl Ray's lawyer. Remember, Ray later claimed that Foreman pressured him into pleading guilty. During the call, Hunt told Foreman that there was a young lawyer in his office who'd laid out some compelling reasons why Ray should plead guilty. The twist? The young lawyer was actually Currington himself, Hunt's assistant. Hunt suggests sending this lawyer to meet Foreman in person to go over the reasons for Ray to plead guilty. The next morning, Currington did exactly that. And he wasn't traveling empty handed.

[B]

I had a briefcase with $125,000 cash in it. Mr. Foreman and I probably exchanged a few pleasures for two or three minutes, and I just simply stated to him that I'd jotted down 125,000 reasons why James Earl Ray should plead guilty to killing mortal Uzi King and would like to leave those reasons with him and Percy Foreman without any comment. Say, just leave your briefcase. That was the extent of our conversation.

[A]

So could Currington's story be true? Well, consider this. Foreman was later indicted for pressuring a separate client to plead guilty in exchange for money. And guess who was behind that bribe. Well, that indictment named none other than the sons of H.L. hunt, the very same family now tied to the situation with James Earl Ray. But here's the thing. Even if none of this definitively proves the FBI's involvement in a conspiracy to kill King, it raises serious questions and Even without a smoking gun, weren't they still guilty of something? The wiretapping, the harassment, it was relentless. Hoover's assistant, Paul Leterski, would be the one to tell his boss that King had been shot. And as Leterski chillingly recalled, even then, Hoover's reaction appeared to be one of calculation.

[B]

I called Hoover at home. I didn't want him to hear it over the news. I called him And I said, Mr. Hoover, I just got a telex message from our Memphis office, said that Martin Luther King was shot while standing on a balcony in that city. And then there was this pause, and his immediate reaction to me was, is he dead? And I said, I don't know. All I have is the fact that he was shot. Then I asked him if he would like me to connect him with the head of the Memphis office, and he said, yeah, do that. Then there was another slight delay, and he said to me, I hope the son of a bitch doesn't die, because if he does, they'll make a martyr out of him. Those are his exact words, and I'll never forget it.

[A]

When the gavel fell on that 1999 civil trial, it uncovered hard truths. But the silence that followed revealed a country still reluctant to confront them. The media response ranged from doubtful to dismissive. The New York Times claimed that a vast conspiracy was alleged but not proven, while the U.S. news and World Report claimed that the King family lawyer was, quote, prone to bizarre conspiracy theories. And while the civil trial and the King family's efforts were. Would encourage future investigations by the US Government, the official narrative remained always intact. The New York Times summed it up best in a line that still startles me, quote, according to officials and former officials of the Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau has checked out various assertions of such a conspiracy and has found virtually all to be without substance. In other words, the Justice Department and FBI investigated themselves and found nothing wrong. Breaking news, indeed. What strikes me most, though, is how hard it was to find detailed, accessible information about this trial. It's as though the story itself was buried under a mountain of caveats, dismissals, and missing evidence. Critics pointed out that the witness statements were contradictory, that the jury lacked hard proof. But isn't it kind of ironic? The case against James Earl Ray suffered from the very same flaws, yet it stood unchallenged for decades. And at the heart of all this is a question that haunts me. How are we supposed to trust the same justice system accused of being complicit in King's murder to Deliver us the truth about it. In the decade since King's death, we've sanitized his memory. Today, he's frozen in time, a man of soaring speeches and unshakable faith. But this was a man who knew fear, who faced relentless threats, and who ultimately gave his life for a vision of a more perfect union. He wasn't some mythical hero. He was real, with all the fragility that comes with being human. And the price of his dreams was staggering, devastating. Let's not dishonor that sacrifice by forgetting what it demanded, by glossing over the threads of injustice still left unraveled, by passively accepting a narrative that still leaves so much unsaid. Because honoring Dr. King's legacy requires us to confront the complexities of his life and death, ready and willing to wrestle with the uncomfortable questions they leave behind. Thanks so much for listening today. And before you tap away, I just want to share how excited I am to be back, how much it means to me that you listened, and I just. I really can't wait to share the rest of the season with you. If you're listening to this episode on the day of its release, you probably know that it's MLK Day. And for me, today and every day, I think it's so important that we're working to challenge ourselves to really engage with MLK's life and legacy in a way that really goes beyond the surface, to be intentional about the ways that we're honoring and carrying forward the work that he started during his life. So, that being said, I really encourage you to scroll down past this episode's description and click over to poorpeoplescampaign.org this is an organization that has affiliate committees in states nationwide. And and you might recognize the name because the Poor People's Campaign was the unfinished work of King. You know, this is what he was doing right before his death. The march on Washington that he had planned for the summer of 1968, that never got to be realized under his leadership. And so this organization is really reviving that work. And the modern version of their campaign is to unite people across the country to challenge systemic racism, poverty, and so much more. There's lots of amazing information on their website, but make sure to click on the tab that says take Action. And then once you're there, you can search for your state committee and see research, news, and action specific to where you live, which I think is super impactful and important to be able to do things that are local. Lastly, definitely make sure to follow them on Instagram @poor peoplescampaign to stay up to date on all the great work they're doing. And next I wanna make sure that you check out the MLK Tapes. This is another amazing podcast produced by Tenderfoot tv, and I can't even begin to tell you how much more there is to today's story than what I was able to fit into a singular episode. MLK Tapes was the primary source that I was able to use for doing my research on this story, and if you ended today's story with any lingering questions about the case, I can almost guarantee you're going to find that answer in that podcast I said during the episode. But it's super hard to find information about the assassination of MLK that mentions anything other than this sort of like official narrative. Everything else is kind of just hand wavy like oh yeah, that was a conspiracy. There's not much evidence to support it when in fact there's quite a bit out there. And the MLK Tapes does this thorough investigative deep dive that's super comprehensive and really just a really important listen. And of course, as always, for a full source list and links to today's action items, make sure to check out our [e-mail] Season 2 is going to be a big one and exciting one, so make sure to keep up with us on Instagram and Xrue a Crime Pod. You can also find me on Instagram and TikTok at Celisia Stanton and through my weekly newsletter, Sincerely [e-mail]. True or Crime is created, hosted and written by me, Celisia Stanton, and is a production of Tenderfoot TV in association with Odyssey. Additional writing and research by Olivia Hussingfeld. Executive producers are myself, Donald Albright and Payne Lindsay. Additional production by Olivia Hussingfeld and Jamie Albright Editing by Liam Luxon with additional editing support by Sydney Evans and Jaja Muhammad. Our supervising producer is Tracy Kaplan. Artwork by Station 16 Original music by Jay Ragsdale Mix by Dayton Cole. Thank you to Oren Rosenbaum and the team at uta, Beck Media and Marketing and the Nord Group. For more podcasts like Truer Crime, search Tenderfoot TV on your favorite podcast app or visit us@Tenderfoot TV. Thanks for listening. Thanks so much for listening to this episode of True or Crime. If you want an ad free version of the show plus early ads, access to every episode for this month's case and tons of other great Tenderfoot podcasts, you can subscribe to Tenderfoot plus at tenderfootplus.com or on Apple podcasts. It's a small way to support the work, and it makes a big difference.

[B]

The New year brings new health goals and wealth goals Protecting your identity is an important step. Your info is in endless places that could expose you to identity theft, leading to lost funds. LifeLock monitors millions of data points per second. If your identity is stolen, our restoration specialists will fix it, guaranteed, or your money back. Resolve to make identity, health and wealth part of your New Year's goals With Lifelock, save up to 40% your first year. Visit lifelock.com podcast terms apply hi, I'm Alvin Williams, host of the true crime.

[A]

Comedy podcast Affirmative Murder. Are you the kind of person that calls your best friend immediately after watching the latest true crime documentary, Jaw Still a gabdon? To excitedly talk about that final twist in the last episode and even discuss theories you came up with while eating food on your couch? Affirmative Murder is the true crime comedy.

[B]

Podcast hosted by just those kinds of friends. Join myself, Alvin, alongside my partner in.

[A]

True crime, France L. Evans, every week.

[B]

As we dive into a new true.

[A]

Crime case while speculating wildly about some of the hottest news in pop culture.

[B]

What's at the bottom of the ocean? Who is in the subway? Tuna salad? Did Justin Bieber fall victim to an arranged marriage? We don't know the answer to any.

[A]

Of these questions, but we probably will go on tangents about them before getting into the true crime story.

[B]

You can find Affirmative Murder every Thursday.

[A]

Wherever you download podcasts.

[B]

Again, that's Affirmative Murder. Your favorite couch detectives. Favorite couch detectives.