Advertiser (13:25)

This episode is brought to you by Companion. Iris and Josh seem like the perfect match, but when a weekend getaway turns into a nightmare, Iris realizes that things aren't as perfect as they appear. From the creators of Barbarian and the studio that brought you the Notebook comes a twisted tale of modern romance and the sweet satisfaction of revenge. Companion Only in theaters January 31st. Rated R. Under 17. Not admitted without parent.

Celisia Stanton (14:00)

Sam Mendez had just received a harrowing call from Greeley police. They wanted to ask him some questions about the murder of Freda Winter. Frida's murder wasn't exactly breaking news in Greeley. Not because it wasn't horrifying for her family and for her community it was, but because it had happened four years earlier. According to the Denver Post, one day in late July of 1992, Frieda didn't show up for church. And this, well, it was extremely out of character for Frida. Remember, this was the woman that neighborhood kids had called the church lady. Church service just wasn't something Frieda Winter missed, ever. In fact, Frida's absence worried her fellow churchgoers so profoundly that a group of them decided to stop by her house to check in on her once they'd arrived. Unable to get in through the front entrance, they found an unlocked window and decided to crawl through. If crawling through a window is indicative of their anxiety, then I imagine the group was extremely worried about what awaited them. But what they'd find. It had to have been worse than even their greatest fears. There, in her bedroom, they found her. Frieda Winter, the doting 78 year old woman who lived in the tiny yellow house on Fifth street, was dead. How impossible to comprehend it must have felt that Frida, this woman who passed out scriptures with her Halloween candy, who tended to her garden with the same steadfast diligence she showed her community was gone. And in this way, and what I mean is that the scene made it clear that Frida had not died peacefully. She'd been murdered. And by now you might know that. I don't go into gory details on this show, so I won't now, but instead I'll tell you what you need to know. That Frida had been attacked, badly beaten, that she had been left for dead beside her own bed. The investigation began immediately, according to Miles Moffatt of the Denver Post. While detectives didn't find anything obviously missing from the house, they did find a shattered window in the basement. Theorizing that this window was how the intruder must have made their entrance, they decided to pull fingerprints from there, alongside other locations they deemed significant. And then, just three days later, a deeper investigation of the area around the crime scene yielded new evidence. One detective came across a nearby culvert, a fancy word for what's essentially just a small drainage tunnel. But it's not the culvert they were interested in. It's what was inside it. A matchbook, a large flashlight, a claw hammer and a baseball bat, all stained with blood. Further analysis would confirm it was Frida's. This collection of items ultimately led investigators to a theory of what had occurred that awful night on Fifth Street. The baseball bat, flashlight and claw hammer all appeared to have been taken from Frida's house after being used as makeshift weapons. And so detectives decided it was a group of people who'd planned to burglarize Frida's home that evening. But at some point, they theorized the plan had gone awry. Maybe Frida had woken up in the panic they'd killed her using items they picked up from around the house. And then they'd made their escape, abandoning their makeshift weapons in the nearby culvert before disappearing into the night. But still, a theory is in handy without any suspects. And the fingerprints pulled from the scene were their most substantial lead. But a run through the system came back without a match. Lucky for detectives, there were still avenues worth investigating. And that's because after the news of Frida's murder broke, the tips and finger pointing started flowing immediately. But according to the Denver Post, calling the police investigation messy, well, it would have been an understatement. Poor crime scene documentation, inadequate alibi vetting, and a lack of proper follow up with suspects meant that leads went cold as quickly as they'd heated up. And that's how it stayed. As fall turned to winter and winter to spring, years passed, with Frieda's family no closer to answers. And then suddenly, In February of 1996, nearly four years after that harrowing night in July of 1991, Greeley Police got a call from state officials. Some kid had just been busted for stealing a car. They'd booked him, put his prints in the system made. And as it turned out, those fingerprints that Greeley police had pulled from Freda Winter's crime scene all those years ago, well, state officials said they finally had a match. According to journalist Andrew Cohen, writing for the Atlantic, when Greeley police pulled Sam's record, there wasn't much to find. He'd had a few interactions with law enforcement, including that stolen car, but nothing violent. Nothing that would seem to indicate that he was capable of the kind of heinous crime that they now suspected him of. The Denver Post gave a detailed description of Sam's police interview. I wondered if Sam was nervous as he sat opposite Detective Brad Goldschmidt in the police interrogation room that February day. Sam, who'd worn a baseball cap, sat opposite the officer. Detective Goldschmidt clearly hadn't planned on holding back from accusations. Tell me the truth. I've always heard you were the one who went in there and killed this lady, he'd said. Sam's response was incredulous. Why are these questions coming against me? The only time I went to that house was in 92 or whenever, when I painted it with my grandpa. He seemed baffled as to how life could have possibly taken this turn. Investigators on the other hand were less surprised. Reporter Miles Moffatt writes that when Sam requests a lawyer, he's handcuffed to a metal rail and left by himself. Instead, I wonder if the combination of handcuffs and solitude brought reality into focus. I shouldn't be here, Sam cried out. With Sam now in their custody, they believed they knew exactly what happened to Freda Winter. Not only did the fingerprints from the broken window match Sam's, but what's more, they have a matchbook they found in the culvert alongside the other items from the early investigation. According to Andrew Cohen, writing for the Atlantic, the matchbook was one of the items from the culvert that they didn't think came from Frida's house. Instead, they believed it was Sam's. You see, the matchbook had the name of a business located in the seemingly random town of Henderson, Nevada. Except, as police would claim, Henderson wasn't so random after all, because Sam had family there. Between the matchbook and the window print, police thought it was a done deal. They were going to pursue Sam Mandez for the murder of Frida Winter. And if you're anything like me, this all might feel a bit confusing. I was stumped. Like, seriously? A fingerprint and a tenuous matchbook connection. It just didn't feel like nearly enough evidence to accuse someone of murder, much less to actually secure a conviction. But as I'd learned, the little known Colorado Felony murder rule took care of that. You see, under Colorado's felony murder rule, prosecutors can charge you with first degree murder without needing to actually prove that you'd killed anyone. And if you're thinking, hold up, I'm gonna need you to back up. Well, yeah, same. So I dug a little deeper. No, prosecutors couldn't go around just charging whoever they wanted with murder. But if you committed another felony, say, burglary, and in the process of committing that crime, someone died, well, then you are liable for murder in the first degree. It doesn't matter if the victim died accidentally, and it doesn't matter if you yourself had actually killed the person. And while it may seem a bit convoluted, it's actually pretty straightforward. Were you committing a felony, and did someone die while that felony was being committed? If yes, prosecutors could hold you liable for first degree murder. So how does this all link back to Sam? Simple. If prosecutors could successfully convince jurors that Sam took part in a scheme to burglarize Freda Winter's house, they'd have him for her murder, too. And the automatic penalty for those convicted of first degree Murder in the state of Colorado. Life without the possibility of parole. At just 18 years old, Sam's entire future suddenly hung in the balance. At the time of Freda Winter's murder, Sam had been 14 years old. It meant if they'd wanted, prosecutors could have tried him as a juvenile. But they didn't. They seemed single mindedly focused on Sam and eager to win a conviction on a years old case. The District attorney, Al Dominguez, reserved little sympathy for the teen. According to the Denver Post, Dominguez was straightforward. He'd said, there's just some crimes where society says I don't care if you're a kid or not. This is the ultimate in unacceptability. Sam, unable to hire his own lawyers, was appointed two public defenders, Tammy Brady and Michael Zweibel. Both, with time, would become deeply invested in Sam and his case. The trial was brutal, rife with questionable twists and turns. But Sam's defense was consistent. He had nothing to do with Freda Winter's murder. And the fingerprints on the broken basement window had an easy explanation. The year before the murder, he'd painted Frieda Winter's house with his grandfather. The prosecution felt differently. According to the Denver Post, their star witness was an agent from the Colorado Bureau of Investigation. He testified that Sam's fingerprints were found on both sides of a shard of window glass. It was definitive proof, the prosecution asserted, if Sam's fingerprints were on the window solely because he'd painted the home the year prior, they'd only be on the outside of the glass. Never mind, of course, that Sam's prints hadn't been found anywhere else inside the house. According to journalist Andrew Cohen, at another point, when one state witness suddenly changed his testimony during trial, the defense was outraged. It was a clear Brady violation, they'd said. The Brady rule, which came out of the landmark Brady v. Maryland case in 1963, requires the prosecution to hand over any evidence that may be considered favorable to the defense. A state witness had changed his testimony. Surely this was a Brady violation. Sam's defense argued. The judge agreed, but ultimately felt that the harm caused was not significant. In another win for the prosecution, Sam's lawyers were barred from fully questioning the police about alternative suspects for Frieda's murder. The judge felt that those lines of questioning just weren't relevant. Lucky for the defense, they had a witness of their own they hoped could bolster their points about alternative suspects. According to court records, they'd intended to call a witness who stated that one of these other police suspects had known about Frida's murder before her body was discovered. This same suspect, the witness claimed, had even asked him to lie and provide an alibi for the night of her murder. It was for Sam, a dream witness, or could have been. When it came time for them to testify, the witness just didn't show up. And any hope the defense may have had was dashed when the judge failed to grant the defense's request for a continuance, essentially a pause on proceedings. There was no guarantee they'd ever show up, the judge asserted. When it came time for closing arguments, the prosecutor was definitive. Society says we don't burglarize homes, he told the jury. And if you decide to burglarize a home and somebody dies, you will suffer the consequences. What we are asking you to do is find the defendant guilty of that crime. It's almost five years. It's time for consequences. It was clever phrasing. You might remember from earlier that Sam was tried under Colorado's felony murder rule. It meant jurors weren't tasked with determining whether or not Sam Mandez had killed Freda Winter. Instead, their job was to decide whether they believed Sam had intended to participate in burglarizing Frida's home the night she was killed. To that end, it's worth noting that the prosecution never provided direct evidence that Sam or anyone else had entered Frida's home intending to steal. Nothing of value had actually been taken from the home. Instead, the prosecutors seemed to rely on a subtle but critical leap in logic. If Sam was at Frida's house that night, burglary was the obvious purpose. And ready or not, it was time for deliberation. At first, it seemed, the jurors were divided. The preliminary jury vote came back an even split, six to six. Their discussions continued until finally they came to a determination. Sam Mandez, they decided, was guilty, a choice that solidified Sam's fate. Life in prison. The verdict brought heavy and unanimous grief to the courtroom, according to the Denver Post. While Sam's lawyer, Tammy Brady, responded by bursting into tears, Sam himself appeared much more subdued, head tilted downward, eyes fixed to the floor. But that night, Sam's mom, Rosella, cried enough tears for the both of them. She'd tell the Denver Post that when they arrived home, her daughter sat on the floor and laid out tarot cards. She tried to comfort her mother. Sam didn't do it, mom, she'd said. He'll be out in his 30s. They will find the ones who killed Frieda Winter. That's what the cards say. The Mandoz family wasn't alone in their sense of injustice. Freda Winter's son, Harry, later spoke with the Denver Post. I got feeling is that he didn't do it. They never found the killers, he'd said decidedly. And Miles Moffat reported that later at least three jurors admitted they didn't believe Sam had killed Frieda. According to the Atlantic, one juror, Kim Wise, said, we had to follow the law. We really wanted more information about who had looked at these fingerprints because we felt the cops had screwed up the investigation. How odd, I'd thought, how little it seemed to matter that no one involved felt a semblance of the very thing the system most boldly proclaims to serve justice. Apparently, I reasoned, the criminal justice system was justice optional because none of their feelings could stop what was now inevitable Sam's new promised future. A lifetime behind bars. Sam, now 19, was sent immediately to Arkansas Valley Correctional Facility, located 96 miles from the closest town. I imagine it's easy to forget the prison is even there at all. And maybe. Well, maybe that's the whole point. When I looked at a picture of the prison on the Department of Corrections website, it's the harsh juxtaposition I noticed. First, the sterile gray prison against this bright blue midday sky. How strange, I'd thought, how something so bleak and cold could exist under the same sunny, brilliant sky that Sam had once played baseball under. But Sam's baseball days were over, a new, painful reality taking its place. And for Sam, the adjustment was less than smooth. According to the documentary out of Sight, out of Mind, Sam finds himself nearly immediately in solitary confinement. It was the start of a vicious cycle. Sam commits a minor infraction and then Sam is punished with solitary. There was the time Sam made an unauthorized three way phone call. Another time he'd used a bathroom key when the bathroom was already closed for the night. Each violation earned him lockup within lockup, and, well, prison is terrible, but solitary is much worse. According to Andrew Irvig, writing for Lateral magazine, solitary confinement has existed for as long as prisons have existed, and its use is widespread. In fact, nearly every prison and jail across the United States have dedicated cells for holding prisoners in solitary, though they're often referred to by other namessegregation housing units, restrictive housing, corporate sounding monikers that, for me at least, seem to evoke a less visceral response. But despite the name differences, what it means to be in solitary is remarkably similar. Across the nation. Cells no larger than 8 by 10ft are generally equipped with solid metal doors rather than stereotypical Prison bars. It means the only connection to the rest of the world is a slot large enough to slide trays of food through. Most of the confined spend two days in complete isolation, followed by five days of 22 to 23 hours of isolation. Those remaining one to two hours are used for working out in a recreation room or showering. Depending on the prison, you'll have varying access to books, radios, art supplies and clocks. And that last one is unexpectedly important. Since most folks lack access to natural sunlight, they're left instead with fluorescent light fixtures that never turn off. A recipe for circadian rhythm issues. And surprisingly, many in solitary struggle with sleep problems. But these issues may also stem from the never ending noise that many former prisoners describe. Constant deluge of other prisoners, screams, wails and conversations. I can only imagine how difficult it might have been for Sam to not just be in lockup, but in complete isolation, while life, perhaps cruelly seems to just keep pushing forward without him. The same month Sam landed his first day in solitary, his son Jacob made his entrance into the world. It would be the first of many life events Sam would miss behind bars. When Sam's dad's health takes a turn for the worse, he's allowed the opportunity to tape a message for his father.

Sam Mandez (32:19)

Really wish I could be there to support you and the family. Proud to be your son. And I thank you for you raising me and bringing me up and always being there for him while I'm trying to make myself better so I can overcome all this. Only a fool doesn't learn from his mistakes, but I've learned from mine. So I plan to change. It's just a matter of time. Sure, you'll be looking upon us and being proud of us, waiting for us to all be together again. I know for sure we will be. So it's just a matter of waiting. But we don't have to wait too long. I know that for sure.

Celisia Stanton (33:11)

Sam wasn't in solitary for long before he noticed something strange happening. He'd tell documentarians for out of sight, out of mind that one day he started hearing a woman's voice in his head. When this first began, Sam was really taken off guard. He'd never experienced anything like this before. And none of Sam's prior medical records indicate any history of mental illness. But Sam's experience wasn't necessarily unusual. In fact, many people in solitary confinement struggle with mental health concerns. According to Solitary Watch, people in solitary confinement face a 33 times greater risk of suicide than the general prison population. It's a remarkable statistic considering that Prisons themselves are the largest inpatient psychiatric facilities in the U.S. kibala and Rodriguez write that in 2012, there were 350,000 people with severe mental illness in prisons across the country. But the link between mental health concerns and prison seems to be even stronger in solitary. In 1993, a researcher named Dr. Stuart Gratian coined the term SHU syndrome to refer to the set of severe psychiatric issues he observed in prisoners at Pelican Bay Prison, a California supermax facility made entirely of solitary confinement cells. But overall research on the mental toll of solitary is limited and somewhat varied, according to Andrew Ervig, writing for Lateral magazine. While current data certainly indicates that many prisoners in solitary confinement experience mental illness, the question of causation remains. Put simply, it's a chicken egg debate. Does solitary confinement cause mental illness or is suffering from mental illness? What gets you sent to solitary? But just because we don't have enough conclusive data to prove causation doesn't mean scientists are neutral on the issue. In fact, according to the documentary out of Sight, out of Mind, many experts believe that solitary confinement exacerbates pre existing mental illness and may even cause it in people with no prior history. People like Sam Mandez. And that's concerning because if it's true, then it's not the chicken or the egg. It's both. It's a cycle, an endless feedback loop. If you have an untreated mental illness in prison and your symptoms cause behaviors that are coded as acting out, you'll get punished with solitary. But then once you're there, the unrelenting experience of complete isolation only worsens your mental illness, leading to more behaviors that get you sent back to solitary. And around and around and around it goes. It's a startling issue that doesn't impact all prisoners equally. Black, indigenous and Latinx folks like Sam are overrepresented in prison generally. But according to Solitary Watch, this overrepresentation is even more significant in solitary confinement. Unsurprisingly, black, indigenous and Latinx folks actually receive longer stays in solitary for the exact same infractions as their white counterparts. Counterparts. The stakes are high. A visit to solitary may last a few days if you're lucky, or a few years or decades if you're not. Sam was not. And as the years passed, his mental illness deepened. According to out of Sight, out of Mind, and the Atlantic, Sam began creating an entire alternate reality. He'd tell prison officials that he was the father of 11 children, that he'd become a Green Beret at the age of 12, that his hands Were fully contracted by the boxing associations that he was married to the daughter of dog the bounty hunter. When he began asking for psychiatric help in 2006, he'd already spent a third of his life in near complete isolation. But it didn't matter. His first request for treatment was denied, as was his second. As was his third. By 2010, Sam had requested psychiatric treatment five separate times, and he'd been denied psychiatric treatment five separate times. All of this while Sam's mental illness Continued to intensify. According to a report by forensic psychologist Dr. Mark Daymond, in addition to his delusions, Sam now had a history of running around his cell naked, of barking, of poor sleep. He'd reported feelings of hopelessness and intense paranoia. On one occasion, when sam began repeatedly running into the wall head first, Prison staff responded by telling him they'd pepper spray him if he didn't stop. Wow, I'd thought when I'd read that, let's stop someone from self harming by threatening to harm them ourselves. Helpful. But what Sam was experiencing untreated mental illness in prison. It's a story that's played out before, Sometimes with unimaginably horrific outcomes. In an article from the lincoln journal star, I read about nico jenkins, A man who, after being directly released from solitary confinement, Murdered four people in just a few weeks. During his trial, Nico explained that egyptian gods had ordered him to commit the murders. It's worth noting that while in solitary, each of Nico's 47 requests for psychiatric help had been denied. And for Sam, too, the denial of treatment Was becoming more and more inhumane. According to Dr. Mark Diamond, Sam attempted suicide in his cell on three separate occasions between 2010 and 2011. On the first attempt, Sam would say in the documentary out of sight, out of mind, that he felt there was nothing left for him, that he had a better place to go. Now, Sam was luckily saved that day, but not without consequence. He'd say that prison officials had reprimanded him, Claiming that his suicide attempt Was an abuse of medical treatment. They wrote him up and charged him over $10,000 in restitution for the hospital bills he'd incurred. By 2012, there didn't seem to be many options left for sam. His appeal was denied in 1999, and with his life sentence intact, There just wasn't much hope for a life outside of prison walls. Until, that is, A courtroom battle halfway across the country had the potential to change everything. The supreme court had a ruling In a case called Miller vs Alabama. The justices ruled that sentencing a juvenile to life without the possibility of parole was a violation of the Constitution. In particular, they felt that a sentence of this type constituted cruel and unusual treatment for Sam and folks like him. This was a significant development, but in many ways it was just the very first step. Notably, the Supreme Court ruling didn't explicitly instruct states on whether or not this constitutional violation should apply retroactively. It meant that they didn't necessarily need to re sentence those already serving their terms. Instead, this question was left up to individual states. But other good things appeared to be on the horizon for Sam when the ACLU of Colorado decided to get involved in his case. According to their website, the ACLU of Colorado is the state's oldest and largest civil rights organization with a mission to protect, defend and extend the civil rights of all people in Colorado through litigation, education and advocacy. One of Sam's ACLU attorneys, Rebecca Wallace, described to Saja Hindi of the Denver Post what it was like meeting Sam. He was broken when I met him, she said. His mind ruled by demons and delusions. It was hard to imagine him ever being able to put the pieces of his broken mind back together again. According to journalist Andrew Cohen, the ACLU immediately requested a psychiatric evaluation for SAM from Dr. Jeffrey L. Metzner. When Dr. Metzner eventually submitted his report, he took care to note Sam's long history of psychosis set off by his many years in solitary. As Andrew Cohen writes, Between 2010 and 2013, eight separate psychiatrists diagnosed SAM with various forms of psychosis. Dr. Metzer concluded that Sam needed immediate, intensive and ongoing care, ultimately writing his recommendation that Sam be admitted to a psychiatric hospital and prescribed psychotropic drugs to control his symptoms. And then, In November of 2012, Sam was finally moved out of traditional solitary confinement to a residential treatment unit for mentally ill prisoners. Now the promise of treatment was a real possibility. And yet, even in the new unit, Sam remained completely isolated. In many ways, it was solitary by a new name. According to the documentary out of Sight, out of Mind, Sam should have received intensive mental health treatment in his new unit. Instead, he received on average, only 12 minutes of individual therapy a week. And as time passed, the problems seemed to get worse, not better. As the ACLU writes in a letter to the executive director of Colorado Department of Corrections, also known as CDOC. During his first 12 months in the residential treatment program, Sam never refused individual therapy and refused group therapy only twice. Yet during that same period, CDOT canceled Sam's scheduled therapy 31 days times. And the longer Sam has been in the RTP program, the less time he has spent meeting with a mental health professional. Recent data shows that from May 28, 2013 through December 31, 2013, Sam spent an average of four minutes each week meeting one on one with a mental health professional. Many weeks and months, Sam had absolutely no individual mental health contacts. For years, Sam endured things like this wins that in practical terms, hardly seemed like wins at all. And then in 2016, after four years of setbacks, it finally happened. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the decision reached in landmark Miller v. Alabama case should be interpreted retroactively in the state of Colorado. In response, Colorado lawmakers passed a bill that directed judges to hold resentencing hearings for the 48 affected Coloradians. One of them was Sam Mandez. The law gave judges three options for a new sentence of 30 years, a new sentence of 50 years, or the added ability for the convicted person to potentially obtain parole. The bill was passed with bipartisan support. But not everyone is happy. According to Alex Burness, writing for the Colorado Independent, some folks felt the law was overly lenient. Republican DA George Brockler tweeted, The most violent offenders, 17 year old murderers included, have earned prison. Not a chance to be in our neighborhoods. Others, though, felt the law didn't go far enough. The ACLU of Colorado and Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, pointing to cases like Sam's, argued that the guidelines should be more flexible and add resentencing options under 30 years. But regardless of the specifics, all of it meant the same thing. Finally, after two decades, after half a life in solitary, Sam Mandez was getting a second chance at a life outside of prison. Things had just taken a dramatically good turn for Sam. He was getting his resentencing hearing. But still, three more years passed as legal red tape was worked through. And then finally, the big day came in September of 2019. According to reporter Alex Burness, the day Sam Mandez received his new sentence, he walked into the Weald county courtroom wearing a bright orange jumpsuit. His once thick dark hair was entirely cropped off. I tried to imagine his courtroom entrance from the perspective of family and friends. Waiting inside. Amongst the group sat Sam's 23 year old son, Jacob. For Jacob, this day marked more than just his father's resentencing. It was also the day he'd see his father in person for the very first time. When Sam was allowed to address the court, he apologized to Frida's family and discussed his experiences in solitary. It's worth noting here that somewhere along the way, Sam's story had shifted. He now claimed to have been there the night Freda Wintour was murdered that he had served as a lookout for a group of boys that had planned to burglarize her home. His involvement, he said, was limited to breaking the window and waiting outdoors for the group to return. According to journalist Andrew Cohen, it was a story supported by the evidence found at the scene. If you remember, Sam's fingerprints had matched the ones in the broken window, but they hadn't been discovered anywhere inside the house. I had trouble finding a clear explanation for the change of story. The best I could come up with on my own was that Sam had limited options when he initially faced trial in 1996. Because of the Colorado Felony Murder Rule, Sam's only chance of avoiding life in prison would be to completely deny any participation in what happened that evening. On the other hand, if Sam truly hadn't been involved, perhaps it was a strategic decision to admit to participation in the crime he'd already been convicted of. It was his resentencing hearing. After all, denying he played a role may read to a judge as a lack of remorse, and this judge held Sam's future in her hands. Sam wasn't the only person to speak. Jacob also had an opportunity to address the court. Jacob told the packed courtroom that the only thing he'd had of his father for two and a half decades were letters and old stories. You have his eyes. You have his smile. He was really great at baseball, just like you, jacob recalled. He asked the judge to give his father a second chance. Eyes across the courtroom welled with tears. It wasn't just a second chance for Sam. It was one for Jacob, too. An opportunity to truly know his father. Looking into Sam's eyes for the very first time, Jacob ended his speech by addressing his dad directly. Hi, Sam, he said. I'm your son, Jacob, and no matter what happens, I will always be your son. When Judge Julie Hoskins announced her decision, she had difficulty holding back tears. According to the Colorado Independent. She composed herself, apologizing before giving her ruling. Sam's sentence of life without parole would be reduced to the most lenient sentence possible, 30 years. I can only imagine how palpable the energy in the court room must have been at that moment, Sam's lawyer, Nicole Mooney, would later say to the Colorado Independent, I think today represents justice for Sam. I think no 14 year old should be sentenced to life without parole without any chance at redemption. I wondered how Freda Winter's family felt about the new sentence. In an article from the Denver Post, I'd ultimately discover that while the family declined to give an official statement. They had been in agreement with the choice to provide a new sentence. After the announcement, Sam's family and friends shared relief, happiness and tears. Jacob told Colorado 9 News about his excitement for the future, for chats with his dad about their mutual love of baseball, for family dinners, for the father son relationship that had once seemed completely impossible. According to the Colorado Independent, Sam's mother, Rosella, had not seen her son in 15 years. She spoke softly, her eyes misty. I'm glad it's over, she said. He suffered a lot. Sam's aunt, Catalina Sanchez, seemed less assured. Will he ever really be out of prison after this? She said to the Colorado Independent. Look at the people that go to Iraq and come back. Are they ever back? He'll never be free. At the time of Sam's resentencing In September of 2019, he'd already served 23 and a half years of his now 30 year term. It puts Sam's release sometime in early 2026, though according to the Denver Post, Sam's lawyer believes he could be released any day now. It's an incredible conclusion to the type of story that seems so rarely to have a happy ending. But can Sam really just pick up where he left off? According to reporter Alex Burness, when the judge's resentencing decision was announced, Sam's reaction was unemotional. I wondered what could have possibly been going through his head at that moment. I considered the many ways Sam had not been bettered by his time in prison, the many ways he'd been nearly destroyed by it. I found myself yet again reflecting on the inhumanity of solitary confinement. Some folks, of course, will die in solitary, but many more will not. And these people, people like Sam, are thrust again into the outside world, expected to make something new with their lives. And yet, according to Lateral magazine, research suggests that former prisoners released directly from solitary often fared pretty poorly. In one Connecticut study, 92% of folks released from solitary were back in prison within three years time. It's the kind of thing that leaves you wondering, how much is freedom truly worth when the system has already stolen nearly everything else. Okay, just wanted to check in. How are you? Due to the themes of today's episode, I want to make sure you're taking care of yourself and those around you. If you're in the United States and you or someone you know is contemplating suicide, please call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 800-273-8255 or visit their website at suicidepreventionlifeline.org if you want to learn more about solitary confinement and the movement to end its practice, I highly recommend checking out Solitary Watch, a nonprofit national watchdog group that investigates, documents and disseminates information on the widespread use of solitary confinement in US Prisons and jails. You can learn more and donate to support their important work@ solitarywatch.org to keep up with Truer Crime and support our work, make sure to follow us on Instagram and Twitter ewercrimepod. You can also follow me on my Instagram and TikTok. Alicia Stanton as always, you can find our resources, including the full list of sources for this episode and lots more on the Show Notes page on our website truercrimepodcast.com thanks for listening to this early season 2 episode of Truer Crime. If you want an ad free version of this show and other great shows from Tenderfoot TV, you can subscribe to Tenderfoot plus at tenderfootplus.com or on Apple Podcasts. Truer Crime is created, hosted and written by me, Celisia Stanton and is a production of Tenderfoot tv. Additional writing and research by Olivia Heusinkfeld. Executive producers are myself, Donald Albright and Payne Lindsay. Additional production by Olivia Heusinkfeld and Jamie Albright. Editing by Sydney Evans. Our supervising producer is Tracy kaplan. Artwork by Station 16 Original music by Jay Ragsdale mix by Dayton Cole. Thank you to Oren Rosenbaum and the team at uta, Beck Media and Marketing and the Nord Group. For more podcasts like True Crime, search Tenderfoot TV on your favorite podcast app or visit us@Tenderfoot TV. Thanks for listening.