B (24:47)
Yes. So I think the very interesting aspect, you know, is really, I think there are two really notable points. I feel like, you know, last year in February, end of February, when the market really started to ramp up after the introduction of the ETFs, you know, suddenly microstrategies NAV was expanding, you know, significantly really from you know, a little bit above 1, I think 1.2 to kind of like 1.5 and then it's 2 and then higher. And people were really puzzled by this because people expected, here's an ETF that trades at an NV of, you know, one. So why would somebody pay a lot of premium? And of course people argue that maybe there are some restrictions where people cannot buy ETFs, but they can only buy these companies really. But we have a slightly different theory and the theory is really that once bitcoin went above $45,000 per bitcoin, which is literally, you know, the average price of a car in the US which is the average first year salary, people actually thought, you know, bitcoin is actually quite expensive and you know, I cannot really afford to hold bitcoin. And I think there's some psychology, you know, going on here where people sort of like just bought. So like the, you know, the cheaper alternative. But of course the Whole dad trade, you know, they don't really use a lot of free cash flow to buy additional shares that buy basically they use basically, you know, the NAV premium. And when we came into the summer this year, we expecting that actually the volatility would decline a lot. And with a decline in volatility, you know, the, the right tail probability of higher returns were actually also diminished. And I think that really, you know, coincided with the navs really being compressed. And of course there was not really a lot of ability to raise more capital. So not a lot more capital were coming in into the space. And I think that's where sort of the theme ran out really for the dads, because there's no really real story about generating some additional yields. I think they have of course, a big balance sheet now, especially MicroStrategy, and I think they should become more like hedge funds in the sense that they selling upside calls, you know, because you can generate 15 to 20% yield with, you know, these overwriting strategies. And I think there are some other, you know, tools in the box really that they can, you know, bring out. But it's no longer, you know, waiting for retail euphoria and then selling high shares, you know, telling a great story because I think retail, you know, has been, you know, burned a lot. So we calculated that MicroStrategy raised around, you know, $45 billion since August 2020. And around 20 billion was really raised with an NAV above 1. So basically retail investors who were ever bought, you know, paid a premium of $20 billion in total. And as you correctly said, the Navy is basically back to, you know, around 1. So basically $20 billion has been literally evaporated, you know, into. Into nothing really. And I think that's kind of like a loss that a lot of people probably like, you know, question if this is the right strategy for them to invest again. And I think we saw something similar in Japan, in Japan with Meta Planet, where, you know, people were buying the shares at an implied bitcoin price of 800,000 USD. And of course now we are sort of like materially lower because the NAV is also, you know, below one. So basically a lot of money has been lost there too. And I think that's why it's very difficult to restart this, this narrative. But I think it brings also like very interesting concept because you know, that Ethereum had around, you know, two $10 billion of inflows year to date and for the Ethereum ETF, but they were only really in, in July and in August and There wasn't really any material inflow before, there wasn't any material inflow after. But we're seeing of course this month a lot of outflows for the Ethereum etf. And I think it's really the question now that because the futures traders, especially the perpetual futures traders, you know, almost like the crypto native people, they were literally all stopped out, you know, on October 10th. So basically Bitcoin is down year to date. Ethereum is down more than 10% year to date. You know, the futures traders are basically sort of like, you know, neutral relative. You know, if you compare really the change in open interest where we are currently versus where we were on January 1st. So basically, you know, nobody is long except really a lot of the ETFs. And the ETFs. You know, the Bitcoin ETFs they have net bought you know, around like 23, 24 billion year to date versus the Bitcoin price is down year to date. So it's definitely some overallocation and it's not that the 13F filings really make a lot of, you know, the Harvard endowment funds or some of the institutional investors really look good here in if they have increased their exposure because they're looking actually not so great now because the price has gone down. And very similar with Ethereum because Ethereum a lot smaller market cap. But here the ETFs are net long $10 billion year to date versus Ethereum is actually down 10%. So that's why we were arguing over the last two, three weeks that we probably going to see more outflows from the ETFs because people need to be, you know, adjusting their books. And if you are a multi strategy investor, you know, you're having some stocks, you're having some commodities, you're having some crypto and then you're sending out your statement to your investors and they look at your statements like oh, you're along, you know, a billion dollars in Ethereum ETFs. You know, but Ethereum is down 10%. It wasn't a great move. You know, why didn't you buy more QQQs, you know, why didn't you buy more NASDAQ? And I think that's sort of like the story that institutional investors want to get ahead and that's why they're probably liquidating some of their portfolios. And that's where we're seeing this sort of like selling pressure now in, in the market.