Loading summary
PGM Announcer
At pgm, expertise across public and private markets today helps build resilient portfolios tomorrow. With over $1.4 trillion in AUM, PGM has navigated over 30 market cycles with active investing and disciplined risk management. But it's not just about the numbers. Our combined global expertise and local insights give us these strategic perspectives we need to help you reach your long term goals. PGUM Our investments shape tomorrow Today.
Katie Martin
Pushkin listeners, you've survived another festive season. You're bursting with chocolates and booze and you are quite frankly sick to the back teeth of parlour games. Well, have a little guess what we've got for you here. Yes, that's right. It's essentially another parlour game. Hooray. The festive period calls for frivolous nonsense. So we have prepared for you today a frivolous quiz. And when I say we, I very much mean I have prepared a quiz. Ladies and gentlemen, Rob as usual, is just rocking up and making it up as he goes along. So grab a cup of tea or hell, something stronger and play along at home. Today on the show we will decide who is the winner of the of 2025. The stakes have arguably never been lower. This is Unhedged, the markets and finance podcast from the Financial Times and Pushkin. I'm Katie Martin, quiz master and columnist at the FT in London. In an effort to organise doing as little as possible over this festive time, I'm hereby pre recording a little quiz with the dynamic duo, the Batman and Robin, the Santa and Rudolph. That is Robert Armstrong off of the Unhedged newsletter and friend of the show, Hull's finest. John Foley, editor of the FT's excellent Smarty Pants companies and investment column. Lex. John, you are also the owner of a of a spectacularly sore finger, are you not?
John Foley
I'm so sore, Katie, I fell over and I landed with my entire body weight, my not inconsiderable body weight on my. On my ring finger on my right hand and it popped out of its joint like something from a horror film.
Robert Armstrong
We've all seen the X ray. It looks pretty bad. Finger is not supposed to point that direction. I know.
Katie Martin
No.
Robert Armstrong
Anyway, this will get you no sympathy in the quiz, John.
John Foley
It's fine by the way. It's fine.
Katie Martin
I'm giving John one point on my little score sheet now out of pure sympathy. So he's already starting a. I would.
Robert Armstrong
Just like to say before we start this whole quiz that Katie designs these quizzes to humiliate me personally. So I just want to lodge this complaint even before play begins.
John Foley
Well, I'm here to help Rob.
Robert Armstrong
I'm complaining to whoever is the FIFA equivalent of holiday finance quizzes. I'm lodging an official complaint preemptively.
Katie Martin
Complaints will get you nowhere because the rules of the quiz are as follows. I'm in charge. Okay, let's start with. Has to be done, a taco round. Just, you know, tying a bow on Rob's spectacular invention of the taco trade. Trump always chickens out. He's been dining out on it since April.
Robert Armstrong
Yep.
Katie Martin
So before you know, it'd be a whole year of dining out on the taco trade. So question one. US President Donald Trump chickened out on tariffs when government bonds started crapping out. How did he describe the bond market at that time? Was it funky yippee or jumpy?
Robert Armstrong
I'll go first this time. You have to go first next time.
Katie Martin
Okay.
Robert Armstrong
It's yippee. I say, what do you say?
John Foley
I also say yippee.
Katie Martin
You are both correct. It was indeed yippee Yippee. One point to each of you. But as I say, John's got an extra sympathy point because of his pity point. Trump himself was asked about the taco trade in the Oval Office, marking the peak of Rob's fame slash notoriety. How did he respond? Was it the nastiest question, the stupidest question, or the meanest question?
John Foley
It was the nastiest question.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah, that's correct. It was the nastiest question.
Katie Martin
You're both saying nastiest, and you are Both correct. God.
Robert Armstrong
2 and 0. Feeling good.
Katie Martin
So no more taco questions. I feel like we've almost a bit of taco. Taco saturation. It's got a reindeer, it's got the whole thing. We don't need any more.
Robert Armstrong
Moving on.
Katie Martin
No more taco. Moving on with our sad little lives. Okay, more Trump stuff. Question number three. A tariffs question. What was the tariff rate imposed on the Heard and MacDonald Islands on Liberation Day? For guidance? These islands are inhabited almost exclusively by penguins. What was the rate?
Robert Armstrong
Well, we all know how this administration feels about penguins. It's hostile. They are hostile. Torrance the penguin.
Katie Martin
Yes.
Robert Armstrong
I don't know. John may know. So you're just. You're not gonna give us options? You're just gonna.
Katie Martin
No, you just gotta pick a number.
Robert Armstrong
And it's whoever's closer.
Katie Martin
Yeah, exactly.
Robert Armstrong
I think they got the standard 15.
John Foley
Okay, so I'm imagining that the US does not run an enormous trade deficit with these islands. Maybe a modest trade surplus if there are also some people there.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah.
John Foley
So I'm gonna say that they got a preferential rate of 10%.
Katie Martin
John is correct.
Robert Armstrong
John's correct.
Katie Martin
John's correct. They got 10%.
Robert Armstrong
Damn it. On the nail. Yeah, I was thinking maybe like guano is imported from there and so there could be an imbalance there. Like some ship stops there, picks up a ton of bird poop and brings it to American farmers.
Katie Martin
Yeah.
Robert Armstrong
Do you know what I mean?
John Foley
Yeah, yeah. No, that does make sense.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah, but maybe. I think they were just looking at a map and circling dots and putting numbers next to them.
Katie Martin
I think 10% is a number that says, look, we're not taking any shit from you penguins, but we are giving you a bit of a sweetheart deal. Okay, so John is in the lead. Pull your socks up here, Rob. Okay, question number four, another Trump question. According to Trump two or three is the correct number of dolls to buy for your daughter. What is the wrong number of dolls to buy for your daughter?
Robert Armstrong
Okay, I'm gonna let John go first. Am I going first? This is who's closer? I remember, I think I remember this.
John Foley
I mean, I'm gonna just go around and say 10.
Robert Armstrong
I think he said it was like you don't need 30 dolls. I think 30 dolls was excessive.
Katie Martin
Well, the correct answer is 37.
Robert Armstrong
So Rob is correct. You don't need 37 dolls.
Katie Martin
You don't. He's not wrong.
Robert Armstrong
It's correct. No, it's true.
Katie Martin
Why is your president telling you how many dolls to buy for your daughters?
Robert Armstrong
I don't know. Dolls are creepy.
Katie Martin
Okay, so we are now even apart from John's extra point roaring comeback, question number five relates to everyone's favourite clever, smarty pants way to talk about the US economy, which is the K shaped economy. At the US Open tennis championships this year, one food stall was reportedly selling a dish of chicken nuggets topped with caviar. How much did a serving cost?
Robert Armstrong
I just want you to know I've heard that caviar prices have really fallen. I say this non sarcastically. I think there's been like some, I vaguely heard something about like people are better at farming sturgeon now or like the kind of agricultural technology has gotten better, so caviar has gotten a bit cheaper. Maybe the, you know, I don't know.
John Foley
But you know what did go up a lot this year was chicken prices.
Robert Armstrong
True, good point, good point. That's not K shaped. That's the opposite of K shaped. Right? That's the. Anyway, this is a good question. Now let's just start with some context here at a Sporting event in America, no food is less than 10 or $12. Right. Like a hot dog at Madison Square Garden is a tenor, just for starters. Right. So you get caviar involved. You have to times two, so that gets us to 20. And then you know, it's tennis. So you get the tennis premium. Right now we're up to 25. I think you're looking at $25 here.
John Foley
25. So all you think that. So here's how I would approach this. So last time I went to a concert in the Barclays Center, I think, I think I spent something like $20 on a can of non alcoholic beer which would normally cost about, let's say like $5. So that was four times.
Robert Armstrong
That's horrible.
John Foley
A multiple of four. So if you think chicken nuggets would normally cost like, I don't know, let's say $10 from somewhere a bit fancy, you add caviar and that makes it $20. And then you multiply that by four, you get $8.
Robert Armstrong
Wow. There's a big difference of opinion here, Katie.
Katie Martin
So, so rob, you're saying $25.
Robert Armstrong
John, by the way, I think it's a small serving. I think my I'm hypothesis.
John Foley
Right.
Robert Armstrong
We don't know. Yeah, but you know, Anyway, I'm saying $18.
Katie Martin
So Rob is saying $25, John is saying $80. The correct answer is first 100 of your Earth dollars.
Robert Armstrong
What the hell?
John Foley
I forgot the tennis premium.
Robert Armstrong
Ah, you forgot the tennis Premium multiplied by 1.2. Every, every inflation economist knows that.
Katie Martin
You should have taken Rob's number and multiplied that by 4.
Robert Armstrong
I can't believe in retrospect that was an astonishingly low ball guess. And I don't know what I was thinking.
Katie Martin
But like what, what is again, like what is going on out there where this is like a thing like so like the strawberries at Wimbledon in, you know, the famous tennis championship in London. They're always like astronomically expensive, but like a hundred dollars.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah. Don't you get ashamed that that is being sold at your venue at some point. You know what I mean? It's just not, it's not right.
Katie Martin
Yeah, yeah. Well, there you go. K shaped economy, folks. Yeah, it's all there for the rich people. Now question number six. The subject at hand is brain rot. Fabled US toy company Hasbro is worth $11 billion. What is the market capitalization in dollars of Popmart International, maker of Labubus? The nearest wins.
John Foley
Okay, So I know it's fallen quite a lot. So at the time that we're listening to this or that. You're listening to us say this. I'm not sure what it's going to be. I'm going to guess that it's about $40 billion US dollars.
Robert Armstrong
I'll take the over. I'll go. I mean, because I have the advantage of going second. I'll just go 41. Like this is the price is right. Do you have the prices right in England? You know, I'm just, I'm just going to be strategic here and say it's 41 billion and take the over.
Katie Martin
Well, once again, John is the winner. The correct answer at time of recording is $33 billion.
Robert Armstrong
That is rem. Good, John. That is really. You really almost got it.
John Foley
I just took Hasbro, multiplied it by four. Yeah, that's my answer to everything.
Robert Armstrong
And earlier you took a non alcoholic beer, multiplied it by four and got the price of a chicken nugget. I mean, this is the kind of alchemy that makes the Lex Collins.
John Foley
This is special. This is the Lex secret sauce.
Katie Martin
Yeah. Is that how you do it? Oh, now I get it. The likes.
Robert Armstrong
God, am I down by two points now?
Katie Martin
This is terrible. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Robert Armstrong
I really gotta go on a tear.
Katie Martin
Now, but Labuboo's question mark, like, is this, is this gonna be a 2025 phenomenon that we don't need to worry about in 2026? These are like these horrible like grinning little elf toys that people have suddenly become obsessed with for like no apparent reason.
John Foley
Are they sing in Britain as well?
Katie Martin
I think so. But like they're very naff. They're very bad. I'm not a huge fan. A little bonus question here about Labuboo maker popmart International. You get a bonus point if you can tell me how much is the stock down from the peak of this year?
Robert Armstrong
50%. 25. 25.
Katie Martin
The correct answer is 40%.
Robert Armstrong
So you're closer, John.
John Foley
Ready? Just.
Robert Armstrong
Oh, this has just been a frustrating couple of questions for me. Terrible. I'm trying, I'm just. I'm keeping my chin up though. I'm still. How many questions do we have left?
Katie Martin
Enough. You can definitely make a comeback.
Robert Armstrong
I can make a comeback. Okay.
John Foley
And we've exhausted my specialist subjects now, which are Labubu and chicken nuggets and things that get multiplied by four.
Katie Martin
And sore fingers. All of those things.
Robert Armstrong
Sore fingers, yeah.
Katie Martin
Right. Okay. I now have several questions about very normal people. Question number seven. Very normal person. Tech billionaire Peter Thiel wrote in the FT in January of the need for a truth and reconciliation process to right the wrongs of the Joe Biden presidency. He has interesting views about environmental and social justice. Campaigner Greta Thunberg. What does he think she might represent?
John Foley
Do you want to go first, Rob?
Robert Armstrong
I think that he thinks she is the Antichrist. I don't remember him saying that, but I just know that he's into the Antichrist and so I'll go.
Katie Martin
So you're saying the Antichrist. John, any advance on Antichrist?
John Foley
So I agree that he thinks that she's the Antichrist. My understanding about why is that the features that the Antichrist must demonstrate are basically being intent on stopping AI and also they have to be popular and gesture is sort of both of those things.
Robert Armstrong
I think that's the anti Peter Thiel that you're talking about here.
John Foley
Same, same.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah, same thing.
Katie Martin
Anything he doesn't like is evident.
Robert Armstrong
Makes you the Antichrist.
Katie Martin
So he said. My thesis is that in the 17th and 18th century the Antichrist would have been a Dr. Strangelove, question mark. A scientist who did all this sort of evil, crazy science in the 21st century. The Antichrist is a Luddite who wants to stop all science. It's someone like Greta for completeness. He did offer other people who might represent the Antichrist, but Lindbergh.
Robert Armstrong
Am I right?
John Foley
He also suggested that Marc Andresen could be the Antichrist, except that he wasn't popular.
Katie Martin
It's all very normal. It's extremely normal to go on about the Antichrist. This is what. What we know. Okay, question number eight. Very normal person. Former British Prime Minister Liz Truss has plans to open a private members club in London, describing it as a. I love this story.
Robert Armstrong
What is she called?
Katie Martin
Nexus of quote. A global network of leaders, of entrepreneurs, of technologists based in the former MI5 headquarters. She will apparently run the AI aspect of the club. Sounds superb. I think we can all agree.
Robert Armstrong
Yes.
Katie Martin
How much will founding membership of this club cost in sterling?
John Foley
This is also normal, I think.
Katie Martin
Very normal.
Robert Armstrong
You take the price of a head of lettuce. Was it a head of lettuce that she. You multiply it by four. No, I think it's £10,000 just to walk in the door. No, no, no. That's not enough. That's not enough. I've learned from the earlier questions. £80,000.
John Foley
Oh, wow. So I was thinking like, what do people pay to send their kids to fancy schools in London? I don't really know, but I'm guessing It's something like £40,000 a year maybe. So it's probably like that at least. So maybe 50,000.
Robert Armstrong
Yes.
Katie Martin
Okay. Okay. So £80,000 says Rob. £50,000 says John. The correct answer is. Is £500,000.
Robert Armstrong
That's like 10 years of school at a fancy private school. And the thing is, you go to that club and everyone there is going to be so stupid. You'll feel like you had a very expensive education.
Katie Martin
Yes.
Robert Armstrong
So it's really a bargain. Probably.
Katie Martin
Yeah.
Robert Armstrong
I mean, that's not going to happen. Right. Katie, this club is not going to come off the ground. Do you. Nobody is paying.
Katie Martin
I mean, I, I really hate private members clubs, but. And, and this sounds like a particularly bad one. So, yeah, everything is high quality about this very normal project. But yeah, 500 grand final, very normal person question. Very normal person. Edward Korestein was an employee of doge, which slashed U.S. government spending earlier this year. What was his nickname?
John Foley
Oh, I know this.
Robert Armstrong
I do not. I'm just happy you do know this.
John Foley
You do know this.
Robert Armstrong
Other than Antichrist, I have no guess.
John Foley
I believe his name was Big Balls.
Katie Martin
Correct.
Robert Armstrong
Him too.
Katie Martin
God. Very normal people.
Robert Armstrong
Very normal people.
Katie Martin
Loose on the federal government. It's all been. It's been an excellent year for that sort of thing. Okay, that's the end of that round. The next round is the bubble round and it's a who said it round. So you have to buzz in when you think you know who said it.
Robert Armstrong
Okay.
John Foley
Okay.
Katie Martin
Okay. You understand?
John Foley
Do I make a buzzing noise of some kind?
Robert Armstrong
Yes.
Katie Martin
Some sort of buzzing noise. Or maybe you could go Lex Foley.
John Foley
Or like, like a University Challenge.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah, yeah.
Katie Martin
Yes. Okay. Okay, here we go. Number 10. There's been a lot of talk about an AI bubble. From our vantage point, we see something very different.
Robert Armstrong
Ding, ding. It's the. That's the CEO of Nvidia, Jensen Wang.
Katie Martin
Correct. Yeah, correct.
Robert Armstrong
From our vantage point, this was one of the dumbest quotes of the year. It was like there. There's not a gold rush on. Look at all these shovels we're selling.
John Foley
Oh, yeah.
Robert Armstrong
You know what I mean? Like, of course from, you know, it doesn't look like a bubble to you. You're selling the soap in the water that people are using in the little ring you blow through.
Katie Martin
Yeah. Yes. Well, one point to Rob. Okay, that's changed. When you think you know the answer. Question 11, the banking bubble, the crisis in the banking system, that's just bad. That's like 2008. Those bubbles society wants to avoid, the ones that are industrial, are not nearly as bad. They can even be good because when the dust settles and you see who are the winners. Society benefits.
Robert Armstrong
Okay. Yes. Was it you got it in first?
John Foley
I might be wrong, though. Actually, I was going to say it was Sundar Pichai Alphabet.
Katie Martin
You're incorrect.
Robert Armstrong
I have. I think it's Bill Ackman.
Katie Martin
Also incorrect. God damn it. It's Jeff Bezos.
John Foley
Jeff Bezos.
Robert Armstrong
I think, by the way, this is kind of true. This is not. This is not the dumbest quote of the year. So like the telecom bubble and the railway bubble and certain real estate bubbles, you do generate all these productive assets. You just have too many of them and you kind of have to grow into it. So everybody goes bankrupt. But in the long run, the stuff is there to be used.
John Foley
Yeah, it's like a giveaway.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah.
Katie Martin
So do chips last like railways? I don't know.
Robert Armstrong
We don't know the answer to that question. And I think a lot of these data centers out in the middle of the desert are just. It's a huge shed with a power line and a water source and nobody wants it. It has no alternative use. And if AI doesn't take off, these are just going to be dead buildings.
Katie Martin
It's okay because the rich Americans say it's a good bubble. So we can all be happy about that.
John Foley
Turn them into private members clubs.
Robert Armstrong
Everyone gets green chicken nuggets with caviar on them.
Katie Martin
It's the worst party ever. Okay. Right. No more buzzing in. We're back to normal questions. Question number 12. On October 30, a certain John Foley wrote in the FT that Don't worry, the hyperscalers are not borrowing money to fund their addiction to AI. How large in dollars was the bond issued by Meta later that very day?
Robert Armstrong
I'm gonna let John answer that one. He deserves a point for being teased in this way.
John Foley
I cannot remember. I didn't read that story.
Robert Armstrong
Yes.
John Foley
Was it something like 40 billion?
Katie Martin
40 billion U.S. says John Foley.
Robert Armstrong
I'll take the under on that. That's fine. I think it's 30 or something.
Katie Martin
You're saying 30?
Robert Armstrong
28.
Katie Martin
28. The correct answer is $30 billion. So, Rob, point to you.
Robert Armstrong
All right.
Katie Martin
Yeah. This is all working out.
Robert Armstrong
Did you really say they weren't borrowing money to do AI stuff?
John Foley
The nuance of it is.
Robert Armstrong
Did you hit your head when you broke your finger too?
John Foley
The nuance of it is they're borrowing money because these companies have no debt. But are they aggressively funding their infrastructure build with debt? No.
Robert Armstrong
I don't know if we approve of nuance on this show, Katie.
John Foley
No. I should have known yeah, you've been.
Katie Martin
On this podcast before, John. You know, there's no. There's no.
Robert Armstrong
Nuance is not our bag.
John Foley
The timing was unfortunate.
Robert Armstrong
Moving on, moving on.
Katie Martin
Question number 13. Lucky for Sun. Almost unbelievably, Meta is still. Still spending money on the Metaverse. What is the name of its avatar filled social Virtual reality experience?
John Foley
Reality Labs?
Robert Armstrong
No, that's the business division. I'll let you guess that you're wrong. Like there's a name for this place, this virtual place that you go to. Is that. Is that what you're saying, Katie?
Katie Martin
Yep. What's the name of this guess?
Robert Armstrong
I have no idea. Dorkville.
Katie Martin
Dorkville is incorrect. John, would you like another. Another guess?
John Foley
No, I thought it was just the Metaverse in Reality Labs.
Katie Martin
No, it's Horizon Worlds. Another question here that's related to Meta. Question number 14. The final question. As you may know, I'm a huge fan of Meta's AI enabled glasses. The perfect holiday gift for people who wish to cheat in exams. And also for perverts. How much? How much do the Wayfarer Ray Ban meta glasses retail for in the US.
Robert Armstrong
This is the kind of question we've demonstrated John is very good at by taking a random price and doing some kind of mathematical transformation on it. So in cans of non alcoholic beer, how much are the Metaglasses? I have some impression that those Apple Goggly things that you wore so you could compute while wearing them. My feeling is those were like in the 600 or $700 range. So I'm gonna put the Metaglass is there at 699.
John Foley
Oh, that sounds like a good price. So let me think about this. So how much is an iPhone? Let's say an iPhone is about $800, but you already have one of those. This isn't instead of your iPhone, but it's probably not gonna be more than that. But then like my, my specs that I bought that are just normal ones that I got from Warby Parker were probably about like $80.
Robert Armstrong
And they were so good that you weren't looking where you were going and you fell and broke your finger. So you might want to go up the scale a little bit there.
John Foley
I'm gonna take the price of my Warby Parker sunglasses and I'm glasses and I'm gonna multiply, multiply it by five this time to get $400.
Katie Martin
John is the winner. The correct answer is $379.
Robert Armstrong
Cheap.
John Foley
Oh, my goodness.
Katie Martin
Yeah. I mean, perfect for cheating in exams and, and being a stalker. Yeah, absolutely ideal.
Robert Armstrong
It's the price of four chicken nuggets with caviar on top at Wimbledon or wherever.
Katie Martin
We have a very clear winner here, ladies and gentlemen. John.
Robert Armstrong
I think we're all winners.
Katie Martin
Katie, column. No, no, no. John is the winner. Not everyone. John is the winner of 2025 with a total of 9 points. 10 if you include his bonus point for having a sore finger. Rob sadly only got six points.
John Foley
I do want to say that if you'd ask questions about actual important, real stuff, Rob would easily, easily have won.
Robert Armstrong
Getting weighted.
Katie Martin
John, how do you feel as the winner of 2025?
John Foley
Well, I needed cheering up today, Katie. I'll be honest after the finger thing. So I'm delighted.
Katie Martin
It's good news all round. Well, congratulations on your glorious victory, John. Listeners, if you're playing along at home, I hope you are similarly satisfied. We're going to be back in one sec. Normally with long short but today with New year's resolutions. Foreign.
PGM Announcer
Expertise across public and private markets today helps build resilient portfolios Tomorrow with over $1.4 trillion in AUM PGUM has navigated over 30 market cycles with active investing and disciplined risk management. But it's not just about the numbers. Our combined global expertise and local insights give us these strategic perspectives we need to help you reach your long term goals. Pgum our investments shape tomorrow today.
Katie Martin
Already we are back with New Year's resolutions. Now, Rob, I looked it up and last year you said you essentially wanted to be more mindful. You said, I'm going to concentrate in the new year.
Robert Armstrong
I've had a moderate amount of success with that. Only this year I am concentrating a little better. I read a few more books and things, but that's gotta be an ongoing project. I'm not quite. But this year I'm actually kind of taking the opposite tack. My New Year's resolution is like, I'm gonna indulge myself next year, okay? You know, I'm getting older and I have a life of hard work and discipline and I'm gonna do a lot of frivolous nonsense next year. I'm gonna be. I'm gonna, you know, drink when I'm thirsty and eat a lot and have fun. I'm gonna be less responsible and serious as a person in 2026.
Katie Martin
I'm hearing midlife crisis. John, do you have a New Year's resolution?
John Foley
So it's not to be mindful this year because I decided I had that last year and then I decided that mindfulness is basically victim blaming because capitalism makes us stressed. And then we pretend that it's our own fault for not being sufficiently mindful. So I'm not doing that this time. This time I'm going to get back to an old habit that I had when I first moved to the United States of reading more presidential biographies because I think it's a really interesting way of learning about the U.S. i agree.
Robert Armstrong
I haven't read loads, but I've read a couple of good ones. That recent grant one is quite good.
John Foley
Well, I've got a really good one that I'm ready to start on. President Garfield.
Robert Armstrong
Who?
John Foley
He was one of my favorite presidents.
Robert Armstrong
Yeah. Interesting. No wonder that's an unusual choice for a favorite.
John Foley
Well, not because of your. Just because of the like sort of horror around his short, brutal presidency.
Katie Martin
Right.
John Foley
Which ended with him like languishing for several days.
Robert Armstrong
Well, this is your way to wrap up the show, Katie. New Year's resolution.
Katie Martin
My New Year's resolution is I'm going to say no. More often I say yes to things that I don't really mean to say yes to. I say, yes, I'm gonna come to this event or I'm gonna go and do this thing. I'm gonna go and do that thing. And then I find myself completely overloaded and I'm just gonna say no.
Robert Armstrong
2026 is the year of no.
Katie Martin
I like that, the year of no. I'm gonna put a little post it note on my computer saying no. And that will remind me to say no to things. Chaps, it's been a joy. Thank you so much for participating in my frivolous quiz. I hope you enjoy reading presidential biographies and and being frivolous listeners wherever you're hearing this. Happy New Year. We love having you all on board and there's millions of podcasts out there, so it's like awesome that you listen to this one. So have a fabulous 2026 and we'll see you on the other side. Unhedged is produced by Jake Harper and edited by Bryant Urstadt. Our executive producer is Jacob Goldstein. Topher4Hairs is the FT acting co head of Audio. Special thanks to Laura Clark, Alistair Mackey, Greta Cohn and Natalie Sadler. FT Premium subscribers can get the Unhedged newsletter for free. A 30 day free trial is available to everyone else. Just go to ft.com unhedgedoffer I'm Katie Martin. Thanks for listening. It.
Hosts: Katie Martin, Robert Armstrong
Guest: John Foley
Date: December 30, 2025
This playful festive episode features Katie Martin as quizmaster, challenging Robert Armstrong and John Foley with a series of quirky, finance-adjacent quiz questions. The participants dig into memorable moments from the year in business, finance, and culture—blending insightful commentary with tongue-in-cheek banter and a dash of personal anecdotes. It's a lighthearted look back at the past year, perfect for listeners seeking a fun recap with the FT's sharpest wits.
Sample Quote:
“I think 10% is a number that says, look, we're not taking any shit from you penguins, but we are giving you a bit of a sweetheart deal.”
– Katie Martin (06:10)
Quote:
“Don't you get ashamed that that is being sold at your venue at some point? ... It's just not right.”
– Robert Armstrong (10:12)
Memorable Perspective:
“2026 is the year of no.” – Robert Armstrong (28:51)
Quizmaster dominance:
“The rules of the quiz are as follows. I’m in charge.” – Katie Martin (02:55)
Rob’s preemptive complaint:
“I just want to say… Katie designs these quizzes to humiliate me personally. I’m lodging an official complaint preemptively.” – Robert Armstrong (02:32)
On wild pricing at events:
“You get the tennis premium... And then you multiply that by four… you get $80.” – John Foley (09:12)
On surreal 2025 finance culture:
“Very normal people. Loose on the federal government.” – Katie Martin (17:41)
Katie’s final send-off:
“Happy New Year. We love having you all on board… Have a fabulous 2026.” (28:53)
If you missed the quiz, this recap covers the quirkiest financial and business moments of 2025, as channeled through the FT team’s signature mix of expertise and irreverence. From Trump’s peculiar statements and the rise of odd collectibles, to sky-high prices at sporting events and eye-popping membership fees, it’s a light but insightful exploration of the extremes in contemporary markets and culture—all wrapped up in festive fun.