← Unleashing Intuition Secrets
Unleashing Intuition Secrets
Juan O Savin: Trump's Foreign Election Interference Records, Lindsey Graham, McConnell & the Air Force One Mystery
01:09:41
Loading summary
Transcript48 lines
- [00:02]
A
Hello everyone it's Michael Jacob with Unleashing Intuition Secrets. Tonight we have special guest Juan Osavan. Juan has shared for the first time ever and I've been doing shows with them for six years a list of what he's going to talk about wow. So he's been incognito for a couple weeks now and that's so he won't leak something accidentally because there's a lot going on so the subject tonight that he wants to share Thursday which is was changed from Monday to Thursday because of leaks and the the information lots of leaks going on out there that's why Juan wants lay low Thursday will not be national security declaration related to elections A lot of people have taken upon themselves to determine what's going to be spoken about so this is common especially among the the very corrupted press that we have it will be release of records showing foreign election interference US and other countries 2020 still laying the groundwork for that so that that's coming up obviously Thursday tomorrow I think it's 9 o' clock Eastern why is Iran holding out so far that they do not want to return bomb precursor precursor yellow cake obviously nuke precursor nuclear dust to the US it's the stuff Obama and Hillary sold to Russia I guess that could be traced back to Uranium One and that would put both of them in the treasonous category. So that's why Iran is trying to cover for the legal activity of of Obama and Hillary till the last right so don't care that their countrymen are like losing everything their power they're killing their countrymen and all maintain control this is part of what they do. Right Graham Ukraine Questions are justified McConnell questions are justified. We'll talk about those two two people so that'll be interesting and then Air Force One not what people may think behind the plot so very interesting things we have Juan standing by right now so I'm going to bring him on so he's like I said he's been out for a little bit so we're happy to get him back Juan good to see you again or good to
- [02:25]
B
see a car hey for sure Michael and I should the concrete jungle in a so I think we have good stuff that are moment I am waiting patiently Better be patient than be a patient so I'm waiting patiently vows to return to the very good anyway and I haven't over the last couple weeks mostly the places I've been I did not want the possibility of anybody elet something or said something that shouldn't have happened your Internet a little bit.
- [03:09]
A
Poor Juan. I don't know if you can get to a better spot, but it's kind of choppy.
- [03:13]
B
Let's see if I can move forward just a little bit to help these government buildings. I'm telling you, man, they kill me. So how's that any better? That's better.
- [03:24]
A
Yeah. Yeah. Good job.
- [03:25]
B
Okay. Yeah. So the deal is we have so many things going on and what happened over the last several days. Let's just revisit a couple of things. First off, you were mentioning just a moment ago about Air Force One. The interesting thing is immediately after the events around Air Force One where they used the original aircraft to backup, New York Times reporters were served subpoenas in their offices for information, and it was disclosed publicly that it related to events around the incident with Air Force One. The scuttlebutt, the conversations concerning that allude to the idea that there was some type of insider knowledge, conveyance of information of this threat or potential threat against Air Force One. So think of 9, 11. How is it that minutes into the event, somebody like Tenet and others could suddenly come out and say, so some have been laud, we haven't even had chance. They're still putting out the fires.
- [04:37]
A
Who?
- [04:37]
B
Did somebody say something? Where was the information? Is it total speculation? And part of the reason that's also very important, the imprint that's put on an event in the first minute helps to control the narrative longer term. So was somebody working actively to control the way any incident around Air Force One is spoken of in order to shape how the blame is sent? Who is construed as being responsible? Now, I will tell you, within certain of the circles, it will be shocking to people at some point, I think, who it looks like actually is responsible for this, what that context is, and I don't expect that to actually come out decisively anytime soon. I think for various reasons that probably won't come out maybe for a year or two because it's so sensitive and there's a lot to play out. But certainly subpoenas into New York Times reporters and offices certainly should be alarming to everybody. And could it be that somebody had some advanced knowledge, pre knowledge of what was supposedly going to happen before it actually happened? And if that's the case, the other thing is, was there a responsibility on the part of the personnel there at New York? In fact, there was foreknowledge. If what has been certainly the scuttlebut out, but turned out to be true, is there some liability? It's not like the Pentagon Papers talking about things that have happened and like that foreknowledge is a whole different thing, and they would certainly have some responsibility to convey concerns to the right place. I've even heard that it was in fact somebody in the New York Times who may have in fact done the job of a good citizen and reported that there was something going on that had foreknowledge. So it may not have even come from the outside. It may very well have been a, a white hat there that could not be construed as being complicit by knowledge and decided to get out of the way of it. So there's a lot of angles here. The one thing I do want to kind of emphasize with our crowd specifically, we do not want to be in the mode where somebody could construe down the road that we have leaked something that was not supposed to be leaked. And as the president comes up, part of the thing is over the weekend, this previous weekend, there was a bunch of leaks that came out of the White House was actually going to say in the Monday afternoon news conference that was originally scheduled. And part of the question was who leaked when they weren't supposed to. And is that something that we should, that should be dealt with, attacked? I would say absolutely. Somebody leaked at the White House things that the President was going to say and do. And those people have been exposed because the President didn't go Monday afternoon. And the information was stuff that they about the news that was supposed to be a secret till release. Now look at what's going on with the Thursday Talk to the Nation. Again, people are trying to get out what it is the President's going to say. And he doesn't want it out. He doesn't want it out before he says it. He doesn't want to get that conversation started till he lays out the terms of what is said in that conversation. So I think we need to be aware that several of the people that maybe want to do something, I'll use for example, John Solomon, the journalist. There's people saying that he leaked information about what the President was going to say over the weekend. He didn't. In fact, he's getting ready to incorporate that in things that he may do, even presenting it to an attorney, because anybody saying that he was the source on leaking anything, he's saying that wasn't true, and he's there on a special assignment at the White House related to the Epson papers, and he is not disclosing information to anybody about what he's done. He says, I'll take a polygraph if I have to. So who's trying to slime him? Who said what about what he was doing or what he might have said or done to try and slime him, to discredit him before he releases his information and viewpoints on the Epstein papers, which he is in the White House reviewing right now, or in the media areas reviewing right now on a special task force who wants to slime John Solomon so that when he tells us what he found in the Epstein papers, he is somehow discredited or removed from that group. And it's for fraud. It's not true. He didn't do anything wrong.
- [10:11]
A
Very interesting. Yeah. So that'll be interesting when he, when they finish that report. And President Trump, when he does speak, it'll be quite interesting because I guess today the House passed another special SAVE act which will go to the Senate and it's pro, probably they have 50 votes now, so it's probably going to get passed. So this is, this will be more impetus of what Trump is going to share tonight or not tonight, tomorrow night. And then probably the Senate will vote on, say that. So how do you see all that shaping up?
- [10:50]
B
Of course, the House has passed the SAVE act several times. The Senate hasn't passed its version. So the question is, we have a couple of interesting things. Lindsey Graham was doing work to get the SAVE act through with other senators and he's not there. And of course we have the questions of Mitch McConnell. Now let's pause for a second. The other day when Lindsey was over in Ukraine at the drone factory and sporting around, laughing, talking about these drones that the Ukrainians had which were state of the art, blah, blah, blah. He then was returning to the US and there's a couple ways that you can do that. We haven't been told precisely which route, method he took to return. And then miraculously he gets home, has a medical event and was pronounced dead. I will tell you that before it was even public, not long. So it wasn't a big gap. But I had somebody that mentioned there's a problem and also noted activity in D.C. and I kind of happens all the time, it gets guttle butt and you gotta just take deep breath and okay, you don't know what it means. But then it was a short while later that the announcement was public that he had passed and the same locations were indicating that what was being said wasn't what actually happened. So let me just go to the speculative side. Let's just all take a deep Breath. There does seem to be something amiss with the timing. And there was a huge push. Everybody had to show up back at the White House there was something going on. The president raced back. If you got word that something had happened where a senator may be in peril or even have expired, that'd be a big deal. It'd be an even bigger deal if it happened to be during a Russian attack at a facility where that senator was somehow present. You know yourself you can be in the zone of a concussive blast and not show any marks on your exterior body. But it can cause a tear in an aorta, brain hemorrhage, all sorts of things, even clots due to damage that don't show up right off the bat. So there is some question are we fully aware of what exactly happened while he was in Ukraine before he left? And was there something that maybe even got missed and but the damage was done. And to take that a little bit further, if it was ever found out that he had been somehow injured in this Russian attack of course he was there putting himself in harm's way. But would that trigger some response amongst the population or the political realm to then do something extraordinary to one response because politicians us politician was there and got injured. Would the Russians have likely known he was somewhere in the area? Probably pretty likely. So would that possibly escalate us create the basis even for some greater response militarily even. There's a lot of questions there on that that you have to take a deep breath and for valid reasons. We may not fully know the whole story quite yet. And that still watching for ways to bring forward and flush it out that have to do with national security. Is that a far reach. You're in the same realm I am on many things. Does that sound off at all with what I'm saying And we just need to slow down kind of understand there's some serious potential. If some aspect of this is not quite what we understand there may be a need to slow down so that we don't come some brought cause some broader wider conflict that we don't want or not ready for at this point in time.
- [15:18]
A
And I guess the FBI is like swarming his neighborhood. So that kind of leads us to believe that there's not a. There's maybe some something else that's going on. It wasn't just a natural occurrence. But if they do have knowledge of he was in the vicinity of a blast. Yeah that that could definitely have a concussive effect from that could have caused some problems.
- [15:38]
B
So Some of the things that we used to go back to the church committee hearings and some of the other subsequent stuff where they pull out a weapon and it fires a dart or doesn't leave a mark that causes a heart attack and other things. There's so many angles here. And of course, we go back to the save act. You got Mitch McConnell, we're looking for proof of life there. Everybody that said something in the pictures imply that maybe we're not getting the full, true, correct story there too. The photographs having all sorts of anomalies in the photograph supposedly of him present, where you got to kind of wonder, I think, of what's his name down in Venezuela, who His daughters had to pose beside him with a paper of a certain date. He'd been dead for three days. The Cubans are forcing proof of life and Chavez, and they had to show that he was actually still alive to keep the ruse going for a while. I don't put anything past anybody. We're in very rarefied air, including within the administration. There's nation state level stuff going on that intrigues abound, even with what Trump is going to do. There's all sorts of speculation because I've said numerous times that the President's going to pause the elections this fall and they're not going to happen on time. Interesting little details. So I had Peter Tickton on stage with me amongst many other speakers, where I asked these questions and talked about it at the Fraud Fighter Summit in Vegas a few weeks back. But Peter Tickton and I, we talked and in the course of our conversation he says, yeah, I don't see any alternative. The President's going to have to pause the fall elections because the primaries already have people that have been put on the ticket. That's not legitimate within the votes at the primary level. And so all you'd be doing, even if you ran a perfect election now in November, that would not correct the frauds that are already in place. You can't fix the fall election because it's already fixed. It's been fixed in the primary vote, the early votes of who gets to be a candidate. And it may not be everywhere in the country, but it's in enough critical spots and there's no correction in place that you cannot now take corrective action in time for the fall election. The only way is do a full pause across the country. And what the President's getting ready to release is documentation, amongst other things, that show foreign interference in the 2020 election and other elections, and not just in US elections, but all across the world. Now, the reason that's important, Peter Tickton agreed with me. A week and a half ago, Newsweek magazine comes out with an article trying to make Peter look like he's off his rocker because he's saying that we're going to pause the fall election. They know it made no reference to me, which is fine, but the reality is that's the public place. He was saying it. And they light off on that. They're trying to undermine that. It's not. He can't possibly do this legally. That's what they're trying to say in the article, that Congress and courts will stop President Trump. So it would be an illegal act if he was to pause the fall elections as a matter of national security. If foreign entities, countries, businesses, persons have interfered in our 2020 election sufficiently to have put somebody in office who was not the legitimate winner for the people of America, then we got a problem. And remember this, too. How many times over the last many months has Trump made the audacious statement? Even all the way back to last year when the generals were all assembled in Virginia, he made the audacious statement, I'm 45, 46, although I don't really want to take credit for that. And 47. What? You were 46. You were the president. 46 again, why? Because if that's true, and let's take it at face value, Trump speaking truth, and he can back that up, what would be the basis where he could even make such an audacious statement? It's not just that. The election he won, but he didn't get to take office. That would be a way of viewing it. No, that's not the way he's saying it, though. I don't want to take credit for it. In other words, he was working and administrating within that stolen election environment I don't want to take credit for. If he was just speaking about the vote and a fraudulent vote and I should have been put in office, he wouldn't say it quite that way. And Trump is very careful with his words. So then, what's that next step? As I've told your audience and many others, because he never conceded the election and he was operating as commander in chief. But one third thing, and I love Professor Columbus, great friend. We've done a number of things together. He pulls out a chart at the Las Vegas. Vegas event. He'd done it other places, by the way, at private events we had even last year and this fall or this spring. And the chart that he pulls out is One that President Trump has shown at his rallies consistently over the last five years. And that chart, which most people don't really look closely at, it's just flying past you. It's a chart which shows the president's disapproval rating, how much people aren't happy with President Trump. And so when he declared the COVID emergency March 13, and then two days later went to Cheyenne Mountain and did the walkthrough that was pre scheduled, when he gets to the outside, tells the press, hey, out of an abundance of caution, because we may already have been attacked, we may have. We may be at war and not realize it yet, out of an abundance of caution, I'm sealing up the mountain. Now. This chart shows that at the lowest level of President Trump's approval ratings and then in the bottom right hand corner, your people go out and take a look. And President Trump never corrected, never had his staff corrected it. President Trump says, I'm going to have to leave the presidency. Resign the presidency. And what? President Trump resigns the presidency? Yeah, if he resigns the presidency and it's right on that chart and it shows his disapproval rating, and then it starts to go up from there. He was still president in March, April of 2020. The election wasn't till fall. Biden didn't take office till 2021, January 20. So did Trump resign, leave the presidency at the same time he closed up Cheyenne Mountain and only retain the Commander in Chief position? That's what the chart's saying. Go look at it, take a look, see if I'm not right. I've told your audience all along that the President retained nuclear and did not turn that over and didn't hand over the biggest gun. And of course, that's what they were looking for at Mar a Lago was the biscuit, which is the nuclear codes. The only place on the planet based on the way that the codes are written for continuity and government, which NORAD ensures. And remember, there's two Continental government operations that are competing right now. It's Senior Executive Service, which came into being under Jimmy Carter, and that whole racket ever after, along with the inspector generals and them claiming that they have the right to protect between elections. And all that was in the aftermath of Nixon stepping down, all sorts of things. But the priority authority for Continental government was retained by norad. The nuclear age came into America. And so what the President is doing, I alleged, is operating as commander in chief within a NORAD Continuity and Government operation. And that the challenges are coming from Senior Executive Service and all of their minions and by the way, as president Trump took office January 20th of 2025, in the first minute that he was back in office, he had a desk with a whole bunch of executive orders that he signed. One of the very first orders, very first orders he signed as part of this current administration was to fire just shy of 10,000 senior executive service employees. It's the largest agency of government nobody's heard of, and they're the ones that are doing all the mischief. Every time. Cheney had a fake heart attack, where was he at? He was. I was just running the shadow government. He wasn't lying. That's senior executive service. You're watching a battle over who gets run the country and what Trump's about to do. Let's watch tomorrow night, he's going to lay the framework with disclosures of foreign interference in our elections. And there's not just thousands, there's millions of pages of documents and information that can be released. Only he knows exactly what he's going to release tomorrow. But then we, the public and people from around the world are going to get a chance to look at what he reveals. And as he begins this national conversation, this international conversation about these operations that are led by nation state, the stuff that Maduro will have discussed while he's in our custody, the stuff going back to China, to Serbia, some of the other rifle operations with NATO partners, London, Italy, et cetera. And as that comes out, we're going to have a period of time now as a people to sift through that. And most importantly of all, your audience, Michael, and others similar, where we have been, people like me, and there's other people that have brought forward said similar things. I just mentioned Professor David Clements, a very great friend, what an outstanding patriot. He does incredibly detailed analysis on the legal side, within the vote stuff, et cetera, and has traveled the whole country. I think there's only one state left. I think there was two. He hadn't been to Hawaii, and I sent him over to Hawaii to do some stuff and he did a fantastic job. I think he hasn't been to Alaska yet, but traveled the country extensively during COVID and beyond to bring clarity on a number of subjects legally, including whether or not you had to get the shot. Then on the vote fraud stuff, the way the votes conducted like that. And here he is out there, he's got the chart, he's showing it. President resigns. He's on the same page as I am. We had that talk at Las Vegas. So with that in mind, now your audience and others similar are going to have to go to work. There's going to be lots of hoes, including you, that are going to have pieces and bits of information within the documents that you're going to be able to share, review, add other information to add context to, for timing and the various players to flesh out these frauds swore against America to put people into office who aren't actually there legitimately, and not just at the presidential level, but down through the ranked Congress and the Senate. And by the way, Brunson is not live right now, but there is something that has developed and that may pop its head up in the course of these conversations coming up over the next many weeks. So stay tuned. It's not live yet. Don't go out and tell people something that's false. If you see somebody say they're hearing it, they're doing something, whatever, tell them to shut up when it's live. I'll tell you. Awesome. I'll tell you. If you don't hear it from me or Lloyd, don't believe the bullshit. I'm sorry. Go ahead, Michael.
- [29:08]
A
Yes. Standing behind Trump when he's going to give this address on declassified intelligence is going to be the CIA director, Director of National Intelligence, FBI director, Homeland Security Secretary. They're all going to be standing behind him. Wow. So this is going to think about it. You.
- [29:29]
B
I don't want to. There's something else coming that I will save probably till September at the event. But there's an interesting angle here that isn't even going to come out in the next few weeks. Let's let that develop. I started to get ahead of myself. One, one thing I do want to say is this, and I want to ask the audience, please, let's go at the rate that the president wants to go. Let's not try to get ahead of him. There's going to be a lot of people want to speculate, and then in the course of that, they'll want to slime just like they're trying to slime John Solomon, slime people within this audience in a specific or a generic way. And so let's allow the president to say what he says. There is a sequence to it that is for the broader public. And so let's allow him the latitude to bring these things out in a certain order and then we slice and dice accordingly. And you won't need to speculate too much. And then you're going to be on solid ground because he's going to give you exactly what you need to have the conversations with your neighbors. Relatives, all the people that thought you were the nut. You're going to go from ass to head in very short order if you haven't already. And the whole country, the whole world is going to be faced with a conundrum. Look at. We have the president of South Korea in prison right now. We have the former president of Brazil in prison right now. It's horrible, supposedly over election stuff. And he was trying to get to the truth of what happened in the South Korean election and had to declare a national emergency and go into the vote center trying to get the information out of the servers. Didn't happen. Oh my gosh. I have. Trait wise. Anyway, that's really important because it's not just America. Think of all of the things going on around the world that if you had different leadership in place, maybe things that look impossible be relatively simple to do with international relations. And we've been fighting a war at lots of levels where lots of people are in office around the world through fraud, causing all sorts of angst for us. This is bigger than most people have even had a chance to really contemplate thus far. Wow.
- [31:59]
A
Definitely. And so pretty much covered everything.
- [32:04]
B
Yeah, I don't know. We got a couple things there real quick that I think we should hit real quick. Let me hit one thing here, Michael. Some stuff that everybody thought disappeared was old, didn't matter anymore. We're on to new things. We're going to come back. And part of the context, even within this move to to have to go to a emergency stop on the fall elections because people got into office through fraud. Part of the deal is some of those people that got money and were in the loop, why did they stay there? What's going on? Because they were already implicated in huge, very criminal, treasonous, even activity. And I go back to Obama. So think about this. I've said to your audience and other audiences numerous times, Obama is a creation of the CIA. Obama's history, even back to his mother before he was born, he was somebody's tool, which is actually very sad. Did he have choices? Yes, he had plenty of choices. He had opportunities to try to break out. It probably wasn't going to be easy, but he stayed with the narratives. He stayed with it because he got rewarded as he went. His real mother isn't even Stanley Ann Denham, by the way. The parent, mother and father, Stanley Ann Denham were both on the payroll, one with the FBI, one with the CIA back in the 50s. And that determined their travels and activities. And then Stanley Ann, when she received Obama as a baby because she didn't birth Obama. And we have lots of interesting documentation, eyewitnesses and testimony that establish that's just actually the case. She shows up suddenly with a baby and weeks months earlier, only a couple months earlier, wasn't even pregnant, had no sign of pregnancy, and in her swimsuit, going places. And all of a sudden she shows up with the baby. And then the baby's much older even than what she pretended. See, Obama wasn't born on August 4, 1960. He was born a couple of months earlier at a location in Canada. And so when he was born, when they wanted to bring him into the US they picked a date to bring him in as a birth date. And it was the queen mother's birthday. August 4, 1900 was her birthday. And it denoted a tie to British intelligence time. Just so that we can spend time on these other times. I've spoken about it previously. So before he was even born, he was somebody's tool, if you will, to push something that somebody wanted to push. A narrative somebody wanted push. As he grew up in that role, he was used. When his mother went to Indonesia, she was an employee of usaid. And why is that important? Because usaid, in the church committee hearings that came out that all the USAID employees, specifically in South America at the time, were also working for the CIA. And although it wasn't extrapolated out to other locations, you can imply that they were mostly working for the CIA everywhere else, including Indonesia, where she went, where there was huge intrigues related to CIA operations. For example, the president. Now it's going to mix up. Suharto and Sukarno were the two presidents. One before and one later, I believe it was Suharto came out and said that every person who is a member or this group cebud that this group CEBUD was actually being used by the CIA. It was supposedly a pseudo religious group. Religious group that subood employees or members. Both were part of an active plot by the CIA to underground undermine the government of Indonesia and specifically named that group. Obama's mama was a member of cebu. And the person who later became the health director in Hawaii that supervised the release of Obama's birth certificate also was a member of Cebu. There's only 3,000 Cebud members in the whole world and they're both. He gets better. The person that came out and became the health director for Hawaii and supervised the birth certificate stuff before it was released, she was also the treasurer of cebud, the organization living over in Bellevue, Washington. Wow. Why is that important? If you control the money. Yeah. Where's the money coming from? Where's it going out to? If you want to have a cover operation, somebody's got to manage the account. So nobody gets wise to where's the real money coming from. Right? And then, by the way, there's only six places on planet Earth where Sabud has an actual operational church location, if you will. So in Indonesia, in Hawaii, in Los Angeles. Actually, northwest Los Angeles. Up there in the area where all the rock bands mysteriously came from. Also Topanga Canyon Hills and all that. Bellevue, Washington, Chicago and Langley, Virginia.
- [37:59]
A
Wow.
- [37:59]
B
But it's not a CIA operation. It's not. It's not. I promise you, it's not. But here's the. Here's an even better one, okay? Because we're talking about Obama here. Where did he come from? How did he move up through power? How has he become president? Who helped him? Okay? What's the point here? Because Obama was getting help all along the way. And by the way, go take a look at Stanley Ann Dunham, who so sadly passed away from cancer just before Brock got to be a senator. So nobody gets to talk about her. Look at stuff, ask questions, blah, blah, blah. She's gone. But then look at the mysterious rise of Loretta Fuddy. And suddenly she's in Hawaii. She's the health director. She helps get the birth certificate out. She has all just the right credentials, but she's never been a doctor, never done anything like that. But she has just the right credentials suddenly to be the health director. And then apparently, they never met. You got an organization with 3,000 people. They've both been members of it for 40 years, yet they've never been seen in the same place at the same time, ever. Isn't it funny? I think she's Supergirl. It's Clark Ghent. You're being conned. Take a look at Loretta Fetti. And take a look at Stanley Ann Dunham. And by the way, in fact, we'll be presenting on this at the September conference. One of the greatest hoodwinkings ever in American history is the Fuddy hoax. And I'll leave it at that for now. We've talked about it previously. I'll have a friend out there with me co authored a book with him and we're going to talk about that. And because every major investigative agency in the United States was part of that fraud. Military, FBI, faa, Navy specifically. You have so many players involved in the fraud of the Fuddy hoax, it's unbelievable. The only way it could happen was an insider Ploy. And what was the deal about the birth certificate? Remember, I'll add this one thing. This is very sensitive for both of us. What was it that took the birth certificate off the headlines five days after it was released? It was the capture, the shooting, the death of Osama bin Laden. They had that information forever. They used that as a ploy to take him off the front pages. Take the birth certificate off. Okay. It just goes on and on. So we're going to have some fun with that stuff here come September. We have the storm summit coming up, September 10th to the 13th. I expect you to be there, bro.
- [41:18]
A
Oh, yeah, I signed up early. I got the early discount. And I have a presidential suite this time. I've been trying to get that presidential suite, so finally got it. So, yeah, the storm summit. I have it on the screen.
- [41:30]
B
Oh my God. I've had those presidential suites sometimes and I just love them. Yeah, we've had meetings in there and like that bring people in and that's. That's an outstanding.
- [41:48]
A
Yeah, the sweets.
- [41:49]
B
Great. Tracy, Joe, make sure there's good cookies in there. I'll be over.
- [41:55]
A
Yeah, we'll have to invite you then again. Yeah, we didn't get to. I saw you when we came in and then things were like a world. There's so many people that are speaking there. I'm trying to absorb it. I'm trying to go upstairs and hear what's going on downstairs. And I'm having all these people going on my show afterwards. Wow, what an incredible informative event. There's nothing like it.
- [42:16]
B
I had one of the people that was there that you'd know the name of. I don't want to say it, but he grabs me by the shoulder at one point and he says, please put somebody on that I don't care about so I can go take a break. Everybody here, every speaker I gotta stay for. I couldn't leave to go hit the head. Come on, man. Next time spread it out a little bit. So we added a day. It's actually a four day event. Three, three and a half days at this point. And try to give a little bit of room for breather there. But let me ask you this. You've been to a lot of events gauging it. Did we nail it? Was it better than you would have otherwise expected?
- [42:58]
A
Everything was amazing. Food over the top. The only thing I would say is have more serving tables this time so we can get through the lines faster. Hopefully they can accommodate that. But the food looks.
- [43:09]
B
Well, actually, we are. We. Matt and I have three times now met with the Ahern to make sure that they have addressed those issues and we've addressed them accordingly. And so I think the third time that we met with the chef who's phenomenal, and I think we've got a great plan going forward. The other thing was some of the sound was screwed up and it had nothing to do with us. Ahern, after we got there, tried to adjust for the size of the crowd, which we tried to get them to do beforehand. This next time, my engineers control sound. We'll bring in additional stuff so that we get a nice even sound through the whole location. It was great for some people, poor for some people, it was a little spotty. And so we're going to. We've got some stuff to address. And by the way, I got to meet with Don Ahern a couple of times, who's a great patriot. He has other businesses. He doesn't actually make money on the hotel.
- [44:05]
A
Wow.
- [44:06]
B
It's kind of a act of love or whatever. He has other very, very successful businesses and with hundreds and hundreds of employees. But he takes this personal and he assured me the other day when we were meeting that he's having the stage taken out. In fact, they. They are shutting down the hotel operations in that main area, their lobby area, for 10 days here in just a couple weeks. And they're pulling out all of that bar that was in the middle that blocked everything. And then they've moved the screen that I purchased and put in for this last conference to the other side. They were testing it when Matt and I were there the other day, including us going over the sound issues. But it will be so much better. It's going to be amazing and open things up fairly dramatically for us. I'm still sticking with the classroom type seating because chairs just jam together. It's brutal, man.
- [45:07]
A
Gives us a place to eat, too. And that makes it much, much more comfortable. Yeah.
- [45:11]
B
And by the way, just you understand what my logic is. The reason I like to provide the meals is because then people hang together. Even when you have the long food lines, you at least got other people
- [45:22]
A
with a lot of chatting going on. Yep.
- [45:24]
B
Yeah. And so it's you network. I don't want that this time in that way, but I want people to visit and network. And it's like going to a Trump rally. The best part of a Trump rally is the networking, hanging out with people like minded and talking before and after. And so that's a lot of the logic of even being able to relax, sit at A seat with a desk and like that. And with the way that it's laid out right now, you can sit anywhere in that room and you got a spectacular view and the screen is big enough. It's just very pleasant and enjoyable. So there's a few things they're still working on, but we have an agreement on that. And so I'm very excited about. And the hotel people are, too, because they're like, oh, no, this is, like, totally changed. The environment's going to be fantastic for everybody. But the information, without spilling any beans, certainly the attention to this event is very high. And I'll just say it bluntly. If you look at the mechanics of the next several months, if I'm correct, and somewhere in here the President's going to announce a full stop. We're pausing. We aren't going to hold the elections on time in November. When can he do that? Can he do that the day before or even a week after? It looked like a coup. If you waited till the elections are done, then cry foul because it just wouldn't look right. If you lost, then you're doing something early. It's a body. You're only going to fix a problem here and not there. The system is broken top to bottom. So would he do it tomorrow night? Would he announce a priest to the fall election tomorrow night? It might be nice at some level, but I'm just going to tell you that the groundwork has not been fully properly laid to for most of the public, maybe within this crowd. I had a bunch of people while I was out in D.C. the other day. No, stop now. He's got to stop it now. He's got to stop it immediately. No, he doesn't. The other side, the people who've been frauding elections, they have no option. They have to go forward at this point, try to win by whatever means possible. Hope that something happens to Trump. Remember, there was a serious enough attempt to kill President Trump on Air Force One the other day that they had to bring in a backup. And then subpoenas were issued and information from one of the biggest press groups in the world, New York Times, some reporters there looking for something. This is so big. It's bigger than just even America. We're in a global fight of some magnitude, because if you take out the election fraud in America, you show that it has to be other places. The people that we have here testifying before grand juries right now have told people that you would know the name of in this audience, including people over at Homeland Security, the FBI, Department of Justice, military investigations that they actively clipped elections in 71 countries plus the United States. As we get into it for America with 2020 and other elections, then you gotta look at who else got frauded and what's the impact out across the rest of the world and how do we address that? This is a big thing. So Trump isn't taking this lightly. And what. Okay, let me go.
- [49:02]
A
I agree with you and I think that what's going to possibly happen is they'll show that the election fraud was happening in individual states. Let's say, for instance, maybe Georgia and the Senate race there where you had Warnock and Ossoff. Both those guys I think are going to get revealed that they stole election and probably more. So that's going to bring a lot of information light to this. And I think people are going to be like, yeah, we need to take a stand down and make this right.
- [49:29]
B
Okay, so let me. Now let me go somewhere else that I mentioned it in my little message over to you. Think about this. While Barack was in office, he did some really wild stuff, including he sent billions of dollars, actual real cash, printed American hundred dollar bills, pallets and pallets of them, over to Iran. And supposedly it was money that was frozen in the trust accounts going all the way back to when we shut it all down as the Shah came in and all that. And so Shaw was out and then the Ayatollah came in and they got pallets of cash. What do they do with it? They bought some stuff and part of what they bought and paid for was material that came out of Russia. And President Trump has identified that as nuclear dustin, nuclear dust. Okay, yellow cake. What he's talking about uranium materials, precursors for making enriched materials. What are we talking about? Nuclear dust. Okay, so Trump in the same context has said, Listen carefully, we want it back. What? What? Wait a second. We want it back. Whose nuclear dust are we talking about? If they bought it out of Russia, must be Russian nuclear dust, right? It's from their uranium operations, right? If it's the dust that we're talking about. But we want it back, you could say we want it. Russia might have done it. Iran didn't have the ability to make this stuff, supposedly this concentrate. But that's not what he says. We want it back. So now let's go look at something a little further back. Remember the Uranium one deal? And what were they trying to do? They set up a mechanism to sell a third of the uranium materials created in America through business trusts and operations to Russia. We're going to sell our refined nuclear material to Russia. And then, by the way, did they truly need it for reactors and for power generation and to sell to China and everything else? Where did it ultimately actually really go? And who's the con artist that built this scam out? Hillary and everybody else involved. So it goes to Russia. And then, by the way, Iran has money to spend to buy it. Bunch of Russian oligarchs made money and a bunch of American politicians and buddies and globalista got money from this whole operation. And by the way, just a little side note, a great American friend, Del Smith, had an airline called Evergreen Airways, and it was commonly referred to as the CIA's airline. What they did is they supported American operations, State Department, clandestine, other things, getting materials anywhere in the world. They needed them for whatever the US Government wanted. They were a contractor. And at a little bit later date, they went into security at bases like Afghanistan, Iraq, and provided security personnel so that you could bring in commercial flights and also military flights and secure those locations. And so Evergreen had a lot of things going on as the Obama administration started, and it actually went back the tail end of the Bush administration. They started not doing the contracts or paying contracts that had already been done to Evergreen. They literally choked them out. And it's a private airline operation. As they got choked out a bit, they took some loans out of Saudi Arabia because there was business they were doing to stay viable and to keep things moving. Eventually, during the Obama administration, all of a sudden they're like Persona non grata. So they're in trouble financially. Even though they're providing this amazing security, they're staying alive there, but their threat stats can stop and it's going to be handed to somebody else. They're trying to find a cause to stop that. When they finally succeeded and choked out Evergreen Air Waste, who replaced them. They still have operations that have to go all over the world. We still have stuff that has to go. Some of it went to a couple other mainline carriers that do other freight forwarding and things like that. Some of it went to a handful of private contractors. But amazingly enough, go back to Iran. Take a look at the airplane that delivered pallets and pallets of cash onto the Runway in Tehran. You know what? That wasn't any of the contractors. That was an aircraft among a whole fleet that was hijacked from a patriot whose original birth was another location on the planet. Came here, been here for a very long time. And they were toying with him, threatening him, actually put him in jail for several Years, no charges ever. That's going to come out in the course of all this, because they hijacked his life, including all of his aircraft, tens and tens of aircraft. And that aircraft that delivered those pallets to Tehran was hijacked out of his personal fleet. They didn't pay for it. They didn't do the service stuff. They don't have any records to show any proper operation there. They just went and grabbed it and threatened his life if he said anything. And they were using those aircraft to do dirty deeds all over planet Earth that they didn't want on somebody's record over to place like Evergreen, where they wouldn't have done anything that wasn't totally clear within a classified environment, and they weren't going to get called in and have to do anything. And by the way, we had a similar situation. We had one of the contractors back in Iran Contra who he was the source that went to Congress says, yeah, I did this, and this. Here's the people that did it. Here's the receipts, here's how it was paid for. Here's how it was clandestinely handled and approved and authorized by all the right people. We didn't do anything wrong, and that person was never charged, and he was directly involved. And I ran Contra all the way. Del Smith would have done the same thing, and so would have his personnel. That's why they had to hijack somebody else's aircraft to do their dirty work and threaten them within an inch of their life. And here's a person that was being a total patriot to America, was willing to do anything they needed, but what they wanted them to do was lawless, and that's going to come out. Imagine having your whole life hijacked like that. All of your personal possessions used for all sorts of mischief, and you can't say a word. And if you do, they're going to throw you in jail and say you did it. There's a big drama coming on that that'll take years to unravel. Okay.
- [57:22]
A
Did he do business with Evergreen? And Evergreen?
- [57:26]
B
Nope, Nope. They just. When they shut down Evergreen, they saw they could intimidate, hijack. The agents involved. The. All the personnel involved in every aspect of that aircraft's operation that delivered those pallets needs to be brought in, interviewed and determined, especially with the ones that were on the government payroll, both as contractors and as intelligence agency employees, including State Department, including Treasury, need to explain themselves how what they were involved with. I had somebody that, in fact, they're only going to be around probably for a Few more days. Now they're on their deathbed. But asked a question at a critical moment back in the 90s, and I had to system through this all they asked and to give you a level of importance, this person's material that was generated from his location, he had a budget of about a half a billion dollars annually just for his small office, for things they had to do. But his reports were part of the President's daily brief every day, usually the first page. And at a certain point through other contacts, I was asked to assist. And all he did was ask is what I'm doing legal. And they have a classified environment where you can go in, get a number, ask a generic question, get an attorney's opinion so that you have something to protect yourself down the road. If you're working on a classified project, there's a question whether or not there might be some illegality, either how you're financing, who's getting the money, stuff being done on or off US Soil, et cetera. It could be any number, thousands of things. People have to go there. But he asked, is what I'm doing legal? And the reality is that there were executive orders that made what he was doing precisely, exactly. Illegal. Going back to Kennedy. And yet. And the way you get in that specific situation and many similar in a particular building in which his office was located, he would have to go to a secure room. No windows, no nothing, camera watching the room when you're in there, and then no dial on the telephone. You would pick up the telephone and ask for a certain name, Mr. Smith, Mr. Johnson, some generic thing. They obviously know exactly who's there in the room and he's available or he's not. In this person's case, he was always available. And then they would give him instructions what to do that day. We need you to do this and this. When you get back to your office, there's going to be a piece of paper on the desk. It's going to give you the exact times, coordinates, et cetera, where a precise thing has to happen. And you go back and then you start your team working with what they're doing to come up with answers and possibilities. And then there's a further coordination. Then it's done. Then the President has to approve exactly what's going to be done that day or at some future time because of what's going on. He has to literally sign to approve what's going on. And. But a lot of times the President wasn't precisely aware of what was going on, and the President wasn't always signing the stuff that was being done. And this person's. I don't know who is on the other end of that phone line. You never see them. What if somebody has captured the operation even though you're on an exclusive, excruciatingly secure line. Yeah, okay. That. There's only a couple of them in the whole world. There's not 50 locations they can call from. Okay. And you're getting this instruction, what if that person is somehow captured, Hijacked with current technology, is there a computer in between you? And you don't realize it. So he's asking, is what I'm doing legal? This is what I'm basically doing in a generic sense. Instead of getting an answer. A couple days later, a forklift shows up in the hallway and a chain is attached to his safe where he has the response on that letter. And the safe is pulled out of the wall and drug out of the building. They do probably a quarter million dollars damage just getting the forklift there to pull it out of the wall. And then they're going to send him to a medical facility to have his brain examined. In other words, they were going to cook his brain.
- [62:06]
A
Yeah.
- [62:07]
B
It took a decade to get that unraveled. He had to get to different administrations. The reason I mentioned that is that within the audience here, there's things that go on just like hijacking someone's life and aircraft, you know, a billion dollars worth of aircraft hijacked. Who has the authority to do that? And. And who pays for the fuel that came out of this guy's account? They even paid the pilots out of his account. So he's wealthy. They just hijacked his life as though he was doing it. It's. Remember the James Bond movie Diamonds Are Forever? And you have Jimmy Dean, the sausage maker, playing this part where it's kind of like Howard Hughes. And then the question is whether or not Howard Hughes is actually running his own corporation or if it's been hijacked. It's the same thing here within the military and in the intelligence side. And if they've hijacked stuff like this, who are you going to answer to? Where are you going to get a court? As I could tell you some of the stories that happened that would actually make people's hair curl. You'll be so pissed when it comes out public. Things they did to this guy's family that are so over the top. But he's one example. Look at the stuff going on out in Las Vegas with Rick Saga, who's running for office out there in Las Vegas. He's come out publicly where they hijacked his life. They've literally gone through the court. It was all over a healthcare system that somebody wanted to run out there. And there's hundreds of millions of dollars on the line and he's got huge things legally going on. Before it's done. You're going to see a bunch of people go to prison for a long time and it won't be Rick and. But that he. They're just a couple examples. You're going to find dozens of guys who were just being honest patriots who the government under Obama and Biden literally stole and hijacked their businesses and their lives and did anything they wanted with it, to the point of even stealing their aircraft and using them to transport pallets of cash to Tehran. All the other things, Uranium One, think of the Bundy case cases and the bird refuge. What were they going after? They were going after the uranium in the soil and they were setting up so the uranium one could buy the rights to all that uranium on all those Forest service and BLM lands. Okay, that's what that was all about. And where was the uranium going? It wasn't just going to Russia. That was just a through point. It was going to Iran. And. And why does Trump want the uranium back? The nuclear dust? Because it has isotopic signature to it that will show it came from the United States, not from Russia, not from some African country, not from anywhere else in the world, not from China. It came right here from the U.S. wow.
- [65:10]
A
So is this senior executive services, parallel government doing all this stuff?
- [65:16]
B
I think a lot of that is going to come out and that's going to. Here in the US it's the senior executive service. The larger operation that's global is Serco, run out of England. And so that's a much larger global operation. It's about two, two and a half times larger on budget and size. And so they work hand in hand. And when we get the rest of the truth, which by the way, everybody here, you got to understand, this isn't over in just a few weeks or a month or two. In fact, I don't think Trump declares a national emergency, if I'm correct, until this late October.
- [66:02]
A
Wow.
- [66:03]
B
It could be sooner. Okay. So I think that we're about to find out that this is going to take a lot longer, be a lot more complex than most people have even begun to understand. And we have to be prepared for a long push. If President Trump pauses the elections, how long before he could, we as a people could hold an honest election again. I think it was unrealistic to say it's six months, even a year. I think it's bare ass, minimum a year and a half till we can hold an election again because of the depth of the fraud. Even though there'll be all sorts of pressure. We're going to be in a very serious environment and everybody needs to take a deep breath and understand this is for all the marbles and you'll never get another shot at this. So it has to be thorough, it has to be expansive and it's not just here in America. The threat is worldwide and that's why this speech tomorrow night's so important. To stop and do a evening speech to the country is a big deal. And by the way, the three big networks don't want to, don't want to do this. They do not want to give President Trump that. So anyway, I should bounce. I hope everybody here that helps you a little bit with what's coming tomorrow night. There's more that we could talk about but we'll save some for later and maybe do a show next week after the announcements tomorrow night. How's that sound?
- [67:35]
A
That sounds awesome. Jennifer Mack.
- [67:39]
B
Yeah. Yeah, Jennifer's got some great stuff over there. Hey, all the megadore stuff is live. She's got the Tina Peters coin over there and it's the jennifermack.com. there's some great stuff over there and love to see everybody there. And the storm. Get to the storm. You can post that. And there you go, bro. Yeah,
- [68:02]
A
you had over 6200 on YouTube and looks like over 2, 500 on X. So good job.
- [68:11]
B
You always get a lot of people to come and view it later and I always appreciate that. Hopefully this helps people a lot and they don't feel I just haven't to do the shows and get ahead of where the President's at this exact second right now. Everybody should do likewise, slow down, go with the real news. People want you to get into the speculation. Speculation. What does this mean? Just go with what is said right there in his face. You don't have to speculate. Trump's going to be very clear about what's going on and what it means and you'll have plenty of red meat to work with. You don't have to speculate because the news will be coming fast enough and out enough that just staying with the live stuff, the real stories will be plenty exhausting and it's almost a foil to get caught up into what you don't have to guess. What about. That'll be coming shortly. Slow down. Be accurate. Be absolutely correct. And nobody around you can throw any stones. Like you said it was going to happen. You said that was going to happen, and then it didn't go at the pace that the news is going to. If you didn't hear it from the president's mouth, if you didn't hear me say it directly or somebody else say it directly. Slow down. We don't need interpreters to say what we're saying. All right.
- [69:29]
A
Very good. All right. Thanks, Juan. We'll get all the links in the description box for us. And thanks, everyone. We'll see you guys next time.
- [69:36]
B
All right. Super. Thanks, folks.