Loading summary
A
Aisha I'm Ayesha Rascoe, and this is a Sunday Story from Up first, where we go beyond the news of the day to bring you one big story. President Trump campaigned on a promise of mass deportations. And since he took office in January, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, also known as ice, have been increasing detentions to try to meet that goal. In July, Congress approved $170 billion for immigration and border enforcement, $75 billion of which will go directly to ICE. It's the most money the US government has ever invested in detention and deportation, and it makes ICE the highest funded law enforcement agency in the federal government. All this prompted our friends over at NPR's Throughline podcast to take a look back at the history of ice, from the original intent of the agency to its evolution as a law enforcement powerhouse. The episode features two people who've spent decades working on opposite sides of the immigration system.
B
You know, I think there's a to keep the system fair, it has to be well regulated.
A
Roger Werner is currently employed by the Department of Homeland Security. He's worked there since the department was created in 2003, and he was a founding member of ICE. He's also the co author of the book the History and Evolution of Homeland Security in the United States. The views he expresses are his own. He's not speaking as a representative of the government. They also talked to Peter Markowitz.
C
I'm a professor at Cardoza School of Law in New York City.
A
Markowitz founded the Katherine O. Greenberg Immigration Justice Clinic, where he defends immigrants facing deportation and works on policy. In the Through Line episode, Werner and Markowitz take listeners through the fascinating history of ice, starting from his origins as the Immigration and Naturalization Service or the INS, stretching back into the 20th century. And they also explore the question of what's changed in 2025 since the Trump administration took office. We're going to play that final part of the episode about what's changed over the past year, but I strongly recommend that you check out the full episode on the Throughline podcast because it offers critical historical context for the moment we're now in. We'll be back with Throughline host Rund Abdel Fattah, who will pick up the story at the beginning of 2025.
D
This message comes from Schwab at Schwab. How you invest is your choice, not theirs. That's why when it comes to managing your wealth, Schwab gives you more choices. You can invest and trade on your own, plus get advice and more comprehensive wealth solutions to help meet your unique needs. With award winning service, low costs and transparent advice, you can manage your wealth your way at Schwab. Visit schwab.com to learn more. This message comes from Dell Technologies the new Dell PC with Intel Core Ultra helps you fast forward through busy work, leaving more time for you. Time Get A new Dell PC@dell.com AI PC this message comes from LPL Financial what if you could have more control over your future? LPL Financial removes the things holding you back and provides the services to push you forward. Because when it comes to your finances, your business, your future, LPL Financial believes the only question should be what if you could LPL Financial Member FINRA SIPC no strategy assures success or protects against loss. Investing involves risk including possible loss. Boss of Principal this message is sponsored by dsw, the birthplace of the humble brag full of all kinds of shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. And when there are never ending options. For every style, mood, occasion and budget, there is unlimited freedom to play. And that's something to brag about. So go ahead, stock up on fresh sneakers from your favorite brands or try those boots you always secretly knew you could pull off from. Find the shoes that get you at prices that get your budget. DSW let them surprise you.
B
I got three words for them, Jack, and all.
E
You'Re going to see us.
B
Take this country back.
E
Shock and awe. That is how Tom Homan kicked off the Trump administration's second term approach to deportations President Trump is pushing through a mass deportation campaign.
D
Immigration raids are up all across the country.
C
Thousands of National Girls Guard troops and hundreds of Marines have been called to Los Angeles by President Trump.
E
Agents, often armed, wearing plain clothes and masks, are showing up at places where Latino workers are known to gather. Hardware store parking lots, car washes, street vendor corners and rounding them up.
C
They've grabbed people at bus stops or.
E
Dragged them out of their cars. For the past few months, it's felt like Americans are seeing ICE everywhere. It's been hard to scroll Instagram or TikTok without hitting a video of workers and hair nets at a meatpacking plant being herded into a break room by ICE agents. A woman crying as she's put into a white truck. A black ICE van accelerating as a group of protesters pushes against its hood. Some of the videos are posted by ICE itself. The ICE agents faces are blurred. The people they're detaining are not. Immigration attorney and law professor Peter Markowitz says this moment what he's seen unfolding online and in his own work is unlike anything he's experienced in ice's history.
C
The examples I might point to are like the deployment of non immigration agents, National Guard, other military and law enforcement agencies in, in a kind of sweeping, heavy handed, very visible manner. That is something that is unfamiliar to me in what I have seen in immigration enforcement in the time that I've been doing this work and really in any time in my lifetime.
E
Since the start of President Trump's second term, ICE is averaging more than 600 immigration arrests every day. In some states, that's more than double the usual amount, though government attorneys say there's no quota. Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, has set a goal of 3,000 detentions per day. That would mean a total of more than 1 million arrests every year. The repercussions are rippling out globally. In March, the Trump administration sent hundreds of immigrants to a notorious facility in El Salvador. And. And in July, it deported eight immigrants who'd been convicted of crimes in the US to South Sudan. Only one of them was from there. Peter Markowitz says that as far back as its creation, some of ice's work has always been about optics. And this is where historian and DHS employee Roger Werner agrees. Speaking as a researcher and private citizen, he argues that detaining immigrants at such high rates and even deporting them to countries they have no attachment to could be a powerful deterrent.
B
I recommend you all go to the southwest border sometime. Imagine walking 50 miles like, like an old lady or a kid. 50 miles.
D
Wow.
E
But that, I mean, but that, doesn't that transmit a level of like, desperation on their part to do that?
B
Yes, but it also is the amount of risk you would take. You put your kid through that one thing, an adult male going across and say, hey, listen, I'll send you money, we'll figure out how to get here. I can totally understand that. But, you know, and putting a four year old child, maybe in the hands of a smuggling organization, a cartel based, these people are absolutely brutal.
E
No, I hear you. I guess in my mind then I'm like, I have a two year old. But I think about it, I'm like, what would compel me to ever put him in that situation? It would be, things have gotten so bad in my present circumstances would be like, that's just how, in my brain, that's how it works.
B
I totally understand it. But you also have to say, is the risk worth the reward? Meaning, are you likely to remain in the United States? That's the real driver. The driver. Isn't that you know, where you're going to risk your children, it's, are you going to.
E
Right. If there isn't something worth it on the other side?
B
Yeah. If you show and say, and we're talking theoretically here, I was not involved in these operations. If you show and say that, hey, you're not going to be allowed in no matter what you do, would you sell everything and try? No, you would look for another alternative.
E
We asked ICE about this. A statement from ICE in response to our questions read in part. It's baffling that anyone would even question a nation's decision to enforce laws enacted by Congress to deter crime, end quote. Peter Markowitz says, optics Aside, he's noticed two other major changes in ICE's operations. The the first has to do with the judicial process when cases go to court.
C
You know, if you go to the immigration court at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, where I often represent clients, what is happening there is different than what I have ever seen before. The agency is moving to terminate cases, which normally, if you're representing an immigrant and the termination of a case is a victory.
A
But.
C
But the plan here is to bypass the immigration courts and to use extrajudicial mechanisms to deport people so they can use a mechanism called expedited removal. And it's a mechanism where ICE gets to act as the judge, jury and executioner. They don't need any immigration judge, and there is very little federal court review available. And an agent kind of determines on their own that this person is going to be deported with, with almost no due process. And so they move to terminate these cases for the purpose of using that alternative mechanism, notwithstanding the fact that an immigration judge has kind of, you know, has a process underway and the person is fully compliant with that process.
E
This is happening around the country. A statement from ICE in response to our questions read in part, quote, ICE is now following the law and placing these illegal aliens in expedited removal, as they always should have been. If they have a valid, credible fear claim, they will continue in immigration proceedings. But if no valid claim is found, aliens will be subject to a swift deportation, end quote. Since ICE's detention numbers began to rapidly increase, there have been reports of overcrowding, poor sanitation, and lack of food at ICE detention centers. Peter says all of this is happening at places where conditions were poor to begin with. Have you ever been to one of those facilities?
C
Many times.
E
What is it like inside one of those facilities?
C
It is indistinguishable from the jails and prisons that I've also routinely visited. In fact, sometimes they're exactly the same facilities. There are medical care of the poorest quality. People routinely die in immigration detention because of inadequate medical care. There's a couple of big private prison companies that manage the majority of these and through a profit motive, sometimes you have to pay for things like soap or pay for things like toothpaste. And so it is really kind of the most minimal provisions that are provided to folks.
A
We'll be right back with more of Throughline's conversation about the history and evolution of ICE with Rund Abdel Fattah.
D
This message comes from Netflix the critically acclaimed series the Diplomat returns for its third season, starring Kerry Russell as Kate Wyler. Now the president is dead, Kate's husband Hal may have inadvertently killed him, and Grace Penn is leader of the free world. None of this slows Hal's campaign to land Kate the vice presidency. Allison Janney and Rufus Sewell return and Bradley Whitford joins the cast of the Emmy nominated drama watch the Diplomat October 16th only on Netflix. Support for this podcast and the following message come from Data IQ Enterprises are under pressure to launch hundreds of AI applications when data teams are stretched thin, leaving potential value trapped in spreadsheets, siloed systems and slow development cycles. That's where Data IQ comes in, the universal AI platform that makes building AI apps accessible to anyone with low code tools that drive real world impact from data. Visit dataiq.com NPR D A T A I K U.com NPR the second major.
E
Change Peter has seen since the beginning of President Trump's second term is money. The one big beautiful bill is directing more than $175 billion to immigration enforcement. If you leave out the US and China, that's more than any country in the world spends on its military in a year. ICE alone is set to get $75 billion of that money. Rogers says American voters are the ones who decided what our immigration enforcement system looks like when they cast their votes for president. Peter says the new funding complicates that.
C
I think it is really difficult even for me and I spend all day long thinking about this stuff to wrap my head around and what that's going to look like on American streets. And to be clear, the 75 billion can be spent over several years. We know they're going to build a ton of immigration detention. The scale of detention is going to be astronomical. They are going to have massive physical presence of like militarized agents on the streets. I anticipate that that's going to become a norm. I anticipate that we're going to be seeing checkpoints. And so I fear that level of funding is so out of scale with what has come before that we are at real risk of kind of becoming a police state. And we've already seen that ICE doesn't hesitate to move against citizens when it perceives the need to do so. So I think increasingly people are going to feel that in a very, very kind of visceral way.
E
What does that mean for the agency to have that kind of influx of funding?
B
A lot of responsibility, I would say, from a historical perspective, to spend the American taxpayers money wisely, make sure that they're getting the best use of their money and it's not wasted. It's a big responsibility. With that amount of money coming into an agency quickly that, you know, I hope historically the right thing is done with it, that serves both the American people, the interests of the United States and the people that are taken into custody. They deserve the rights that are available to them under the laws that Congress has passed.
E
But in spite of all the money heading ice's way and the responsibility that comes with it, Roger doesn't think this moment is fundamentally different from the rest of ICE's history, or for that matter, INS's.
B
This is nothing out of the ordinary. None of this has been out of the ordinary over the years as it's been a result of funding and congressional and executive and political support and largely driven by the American people. This comes in waves of about every 30 years with our immigration policy. We become too generous and people feel that we're being taken advantage of. So then I want a more firm hand or, you know, more thorough examination of things. There's always a pendulum swing, but there is. You do have to have a deterrent because we can absorb everybody inside the United States. So it depends on where you sit on the issue is how you're going to judge that. I guess, you know, if you think we should let in everybody, then, you know, but that's not what the majority of the American public believe in. So that's not where the polls are. They want some degree of immigration enforcement. What that looks like, that's always a, you know, that's that pendulum swinging back and forth.
E
Peter disagrees. He says if you look at current polls, you'll see that most Americans actually oppose the kind of immigration enforcement that's being carried out by ICE today. And he worries that we've entered an era where ICE is amassing more and more power. And he feels like the checks on that power are disappearing.
C
In the first Trump administration, you know, there were, you know, institutional players in the White House and DOJ and dhs, you know, said, wait, wait, wait, we have to follow the law. Those people are all gone. Like, there are no internal, internal checks going on anymore. Beyond that, what are the other checks? The immigration courts are being purged, right? Anybody who is not kind of aligned is being pushed out. What I had hoped was that the Supreme Court may actually provide some kind of check against the most extreme examples. And with one or two notable exceptions, that has really not been the case. Right? Over and over again, they're letting them remove people to countries they have never come from or had any connection to. They're allowing the revocation of hundreds of thousands of TPS holders status Venezuelans. They're stripping hundreds of thousands of people of humanitarian protections. And so the Supreme Court is no backstop either. And so no internal backstop, no immigration court backstop, no Supreme Court backstop. We are in a really, really, really precarious place as a country.
B
I would impart to the listeners that you really have to understand that the men and women who work for these agencies, especially Immigration Customs Enforcement, have dedicated their life to public service.
C
Tom Homan keeps saying, just wait, just wait. We're just getting started. And I believe him.
A
To hear the full episode, you can find Throughline wherever you get your podcasts there. You can also check out the rest of Throughline's recent immigration series. This episode was produced by Rund Abdel Fattah and Sarah Wyman with help from the rest of the Throughline team. It was edited by Casey Minor. Andrew Mambo produced this episode of the Sunday Story. The rest of the Sunday Story team includes Jenny Schmidt, Justine Yan, Thomas Coltrane and Liana Simstrom. Our executive producer is Irene Noguchi. I'm Aisha Roscoe. And up first, we'll be back tomorrow with all the news you need to start your week. Until then, have a great rest of your weekend.
D
This Message comes from NPR sponsor 1Password. Secure access to your online world, from emails to banking, so you can protect what matters most with 1Password. For a free two week trial, go to 1Password.com NPR support for NPR and.
E
The following message come from Rosetta Stone. The perfect app to achieve your language learning goals. No matter how busy your schedule gets. It's designed to maximize study time with immersive 10 minute lessons and audio practice for your commute. Plus tailor your learning plan for specific objectives like travel. Get Rosetta Stone's lifetime membership for 50% off and unlimited access to 25 language courses. Learn more at rosettastone.com NPR this message comes from Warby Parker. Prescription eyewear that's expertly crafted and unexpectedly affordable. Glasses designed in house from premium materials starting at just $95, including prescription lenses. Stop by a Warby Parker store near you.
This Sunday Story episode of NPR’s Up First, hosted by Ayesha Rascoe, explores the transformation of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) since President Trump’s second term began in January 2025. Against the backdrop of a historic injection of $170 billion for immigration enforcement—$75 billion for ICE alone—reporters and guests dissect how ICE’s role, tactics, and influence have radically shifted. Drawing from the reporting of NPR’s Throughline podcast, the episode presents perspectives from Roger Werner (a founding member of ICE and DHS historian) and Peter Markowitz (immigration attorney and law professor), who examine recent developments, historical context, and the contentious national debate over the agency's power and methods.
Tom Homan, on the administration’s approach [04:26, paraphrased]:
"Shock and awe. That is how Tom Homan kicked off the Trump administration’s second term approach to deportations..."
Peter Markowitz, on unprecedented enforcement [05:59]:
"The deployment of non-immigration agents... in a kind of sweeping, heavy-handed, very visible manner... is unfamiliar to me... in any time in my lifetime."
Werner, on the cyclical nature of immigration policy [15:59]:
"There’s always a pendulum swing... but you do have to have a deterrent."
Markowitz, on the erosion of checks and balances [17:19]:
"No internal check... no immigration court backstop, no Supreme Court backstop. We are in a really, really, really precarious place as a country."
Markowitz, on ICE’s expanded reach [13:58]:
"We’re at real risk of kind of becoming a police state... increasingly people are going to feel that in a very, very visceral way."
This episode delivers a sobering look at the dramatically expanded scope, power, and visibility of ICE under the second Trump administration. The conversation between historian Roger Werner and immigration attorney Peter Markowitz vividly illustrates the resulting tensions: between enforcement and humanitarian concerns, historical precedent and political reality, and the enduring question of how far a democracy should go in pursuit of border security. The policies and funding surge have set the stage for a new era in American immigration enforcement—one that, as the guests make clear, is roiling communities, the courts, and the country’s sense of itself.
For deeper historical context and a fuller narrative, listeners are encouraged to check out the original Throughline episode.