A (9:17)
As I'm reading this live last night, I'm laughing to myself. Our powerful armed forces for a period of 2 weeks safe passes through the Strait of Hormuz will be possible via coordination with Iran's armed forces and with due consideration of technical limitations, says Iran. Got it. So now we're in an actual negotiation. Suddenly we were able to shake free a meaningful negotiation where the president, where the United States has offered a 15 point plan, what are the primary two points, which is stop attacking shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and get rid of your nuclear material. Those are the two big priorities. Forget the rest of the 15, those are the two big priorities. And then for the Iranians, what is their 10 point plan? What is President Trump working with here? Well, the Guardian has a summary of this. What's in the ten point plan? And they say that the Iranians are demanding the following. And they don't have all 10 points listed out, but they say the list published by Iranian media includes a number of conditions. The lifting of all primary and secondary sanctions on Iran. They want their sanctions lifted. I'm telling you what right now, Iran, if you actually play ball with President Trump and you get rid of your nuclear program and you open up the Strait of Hormuz you do all these things, you stop your terrorism, your future could be very bright. The whole reason sanctions are imposed upon you, the it is because of your nuclear program threatening the Strait of Hormuz and conducting terror attacks in the region. You stop all that crap, you lose these sanctions. So that's easy. You want that? That one's easy. President Trump will play ball with that if you knock off your garbage. They say continued Iranian control over the Strait of Hormuz is what they want. Interestingly, the President spoke to a reporter this morning. I'm seeing on Ex immediately that once again on the phone reporters today. And he spoke to Jonathan Karl of ABC News about this. And here's what Jonathan says. He said, I just got off the phone with the President. I asked if he was okay with the Iranians charging a toll for all ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz. He told me that there actually may be a joint US Iran venture to charge tolls. So here's the. This is the President negotiating. How can we get a piece of the action here? We're thinking of doing it as a joint venture. The President said it's a way of securing it, also securing it from lots of other people. It's a beautiful thing. It's a beautiful thing. So here's the President saying, okay, I can work with this. We can figure out a way to make this happen. I'm a deal maker. Here's another one. The US Military's withdrawal from the Middle east is an Iranian demand. I don't anticipate that that's actually gonna be the case. I don't know what that's. The rest of the Middle east is very happy with the United States. So the idea that we would leave the entire Middle east doesn't seem likely. I don't think the Trump administration is gonna do that. An end to attacks on Iran and its allies. Well, sure. You stop being belligerent idiots, then we'll stop attacking you. The release of frozen Iranian assets, sure, that would be the drop of sanctions and a UN Security Council resolution making any deal binding. Nobody here cares about that. The UN Is nothing. The UN Is ridiculous operations. So if they want to send out some ceremonial letters, by all means. But this is what the Iranians want. Now, the Guardian points out, which is kind of an interesting and almost hilarious acknowledgment, they said in a version that was released in Farsi, Iran also included the phrase acceptance of enrichment for its nuclear program. Yeah, that's not going to happen. That's not going to happen. That's a non starter and we've got all the leverage in this conversation. So yeah, that's not happening at all. But for reasons that remain unclear, that phrase was missing in English versions shared by Iranian diplomats to journalists. Hilarious. Why do you think they left it out of the English language versions? Guardian, come on. What do you mean for reasons that were unclear? It's clear to any thinking person why they would exclude that detail from the English language summary of their demands. Of course. Hysterical. They want to, they want to pursue nuclear weapons. That's why. And they're not trying. They don't want the, the English speaking world to dwell on that. Now, how did this happen? How did we get to this breaking news? Well, it took a lot of behind the scenes negotiations and there is reporting this morning that there were two very critical parties who were involved in this that helped get this to the point that we saw last night. One of them was the Vice President of the United States. Multiple reports are indicating that Vice President J.D. vance got involved in negotiations late Tuesday and was able to help bring this to kind of a final resolution or at least this intermediary resolution right now, which is, which is great news. The other is China. China, the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese government got involved yesterday and has been involved. And here's what the reporting tells us. We've seen this. Here's the Associated Press. A woman by the name of Farnoo Shah. Mary. She says an official from one of the mediating countries tells me that the 11th hour deal between the United States and Iran came together after the involvement of two unlikely actors. Vice President J.D. vance. It's actually not that unlikely. President Trump's been saying JD Vance has been essential to the negotiations, but whatever. And China, China. So Vance was looped in late Tuesday, she says, and China helped get Iran on board. I mentioned to you yesterday that China needs the Strait of Hormuz to be open. It needs it. Why is that? Because somewhere between 40 to 50% of all of their oil and gas comes through the Strait of Hormuz. China has so much on the line here. And so just again, to the President's credit, understand where we were a week ago. The President was, was outraged and he has been outraged by the lack of involvement of the global community to assist us in resolving this entire crisis. The President said, I'm taking care of a terror threat. I'm denuclearizing Iran. We're finally cleaning up a mess that's been there for 47 years. Where the hell are the rest of you. Where's Naito? Where are the Asian countries? Where are all these countries who are dependent on the energy that flows through that region? You're not going to be a part of this. You're not going to assist us at all. And what happened? We got Middle Eastern countries who all rushed in, Pakistan rushed in. They're playing mediators to try and make this thing come to an end. They want this thing to come to an end. And meanwhile, China gets involved because its own energy futures on the line. And now it's a part of helping us negotiate an end to this war, to this conflict. So the President was able to score a lot of victories here and get the whole world to wake the hell up. That's how we get here. This is a victory for the United States that President Trump and our incredible military made happen. Caroline Levitt sharing this message last night. From the very beginning of Operation Epic Fury, President Trump did estimate that this would be a four to six week operation. Thanks to the unbelievable capabilities of our warriors, we have achieved and exceeded our core military objectives in 38 days. Ladies and gentlemen, pay attention to the timetable that the White House is giving us right now. Four to six weeks was the operation they say. We've, we've exceeded and achieved our core military objectives. And now 38 days. The way the White House is now talking about this is we're essentially done. Now it's just a matter of working out the details that are going to appear on paper getting Iran to agree to this deal, but a negotiation, a very real one, is underway. I've seen some reporting that this, we can have in person negotiations as early as the end of this week, perhaps by Friday of this week. You could see a major administration official, official overseas meeting at a table directly with the Iranians. Keep your eyes open for that. The Secretary of War and Chairman Dan Kaine, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, addressing the press this morning about all of the details. Caroline Levitt says the success of our military created maximum leverage, allowing President Trump and the team to engage in tough negotiations that have now created an opening for a diplomatic solution and long term peace. Additionally, President Trump got the Strait of Hormuz reopened. Never underestimate President Trump's ability to successfully advance America's interests and broker peace. So again, this is, this is an operation. They said four to six weeks. Here we are still inside of that window. And it looks like the White House is ready to say we've done what we came to do. We've done exactly what we came to do. Which is an amazing development. Now there is a very interesting piece that I wanna take you through a little bit here in a moment and it's in the New York Times today. The New York Times has what you might call a TikTok, a breakdown. The moment by moment, blow by blow way that the President made the decision to go to war. And I'm gonna tell you, I'm just gonna. The spoiler alert on this piece is immediately you realize how thoughtful and how competent and how deliberative the President of the United States was in all of this. There was nothing impulsive about this. There was no hip firing going on. There was a clear eyed assessment of what they were about to do and what they engaged in as they went into Iran. And for that matter there was a pushback on the Israelis. Cuz the Israelis had all these big schemes that they wanted to play out here. And the American government, all the advisers around the President and the President himself said no. Some of this is in their words, quote, bullshit. We're not doing that. We have goals, we can achieve those ones. That's what we're going to do. I want to take you through that in just a moment because I think it colors in the lines quite a bit about what was happening behind the scenes and the kind of really healthy environment that exists around the President of the United States. He's got a lot of advisors. Not all of them agree with each other, but they had a very healthy and meaningful debate. They made a decision and they all went in together. This is the way it's supposed to work. This is the way it's supposed to work. I'll take you through it in just a moment. I want to thank pocket hose for being a great sponsor of our program. It's the world's number one expandable hose. Do you have a pocket hose yet? You should get one. If you're. If you've ever wrestled with one of the old fashioned rubber hoses, you know that that is a pain. It adds a bunch of headache to what should be a simple task which is to just get some water out of a hose. Then you're like coiling it back up, trying to make it perfect. You don't want it's getting kinked. It's all a mess. Not with copperheads. Pocket pivot. It's just an amazing thing because it fixes all of that with a full 360 degree swivel. It gives you smooth, steady water flow and total freedom to move around your yard with these. And when you're finished watering It's a rust proof anti burst hose that does something amazing. It actually just shrinks right back down. The size, pocket size. No heavy lifting, no wrestling it back onto the reel. The brand new pocket hose Copperhead with pocket pivot. It's a total game changer. I love using it because right after I'm done, I've just got, I've got like, I don't, you know, you don't have to use like a big coil for it. I just have a little like kind of decorative bucket. I drop the hose in it and there it is. It's, it shrinks back down to this little tiny, you know, pile and then, and then it's easy to pull out. No tangling, no issues. Watering the yard has never been easier. For a limited time, my listeners can get a free pocket Pivot and their 10 pattern sprayer with the purchase of any size copperhead hose. Just text Vince to 64,000. That's Vince to 64,000 for your two free gifts with purchase. Vince to 64,000. Message and data rates may apply. See terms for details. Thank you to pocket hose. So good. All right, so the New York Times has this great piece that, you know, and you never, you never quite know how much they nail the details, but this piece rings to me as a very true recitation of the facts. And here's what they said. How Trump took the US to war with Iran is the headline on the piece. And you can mostly ignore the headline. I mean, fundamentally, it's about, you know, what's the back and forth and the scene. Setter. The piece begins by describing a meeting on February 11 when Benjamin Netanyahu arrives at the White House and makes the case that now is the time to strike Iran. This is the time. So he's trying to convince the United States that this is a worthwhile endeavor. And he makes a number of asks. In fact, the US Intelligence community breaks it down into four components that Netanyahu asked for and the US Intelligence community reviewed it. And then they came back to the President and then they said, two of these are achievable, two of these are ridiculous. Here's what they said. The Results of the US intelligence analysis were shared on February 12th with the President in a meeting for only American officials in the situation room. Before Mr. Trump arrived, two senior intel officials briefed the President's inner circle. The intel officials had deep expertise in US Military capabilities, and they knew the Iranian system and its players inside out. They broke down Netanyahu's presentation into four parts. First was Decapitation killing the Ayatollah. Second was crippling Iran's capacity to project power and threaten its neighbors. Third was a popular uprising inside of Iran. In other words, Netanyahu was hoping to arm everybody and get an uprising going and overthrow the regime. Regime. And fourth was regime change with a secular leader installed to govern the country. The US Officials assessed that the first two objectives were achievable. Those first two, remember, that's kill the Ayatollah and cripple Iran's military. Those, we can definitely do that. But fomenting an uprising, regime change, yeah, that's way more complicated. And, and Netanyahu's pitch was detached from reality. The US intel assessment was. So when Mr. Trump joined the meeting, John Ratcliffe briefed him on the assessment. The CIA director used one word to describe the Israeli Prime Minister's regime change scenario. Farcical. It's a farce. Not achievable. At that point, Mr. Rubio cut in. Secretary Rubio quote, in other words, it's bullshit. Said Rubio, listen how clear eyed these guys are. These are not guys who are being yanked around by Israel, not being led around by the nose by the Israelis. These are guys who are saying, well, these two things are achievable. These are in our interest. Those other two, Netanyahu is like way overstating what's possible here. Let's just ignore that. So Ratcliffe added that given the unpredictability of events in any conflict, regime change could happen. Could, but it shouldn't be considered unachievable. Objective. General Kaine weighed in. He was asked by the President what he thought. He said, sir, in my experience, standard operating procedure for the Israelis, what they're doing, they oversell and their plans are not always well developed. They know they need us, and that's why they're hard selling. Mr. Trump quickly weighed the assessment. Regime change, he said, would be, quote, their problem. Their problem. But he appeared to remain very interested in accomplishing parts one and two. Okay, so here's the President deliberating, talking about how we do this, what's actually achievable, what's in the American interest, how out of control Israel is being here. And then the other piece was, you know, what did these guys all think of going in? And so the President asked each of his cabinet members what they thought of all of this. And it came down to, in the end that J.D. vance expressed skepticism about going in. This is, here's Thursday, February 26th. Let me take you to that moment. They said they had A final Situation Room meeting. It got underway. By now, the positions of everybody in the room were clear. Everybody had discussed everything in previous meetings. Everybody knew where everybody else stood. The discussion would last about an hour and a half. Listen to how healthy and productive this is, guys. This is the way adults handle conversations. This is the way a healthy administration conducts this. Mr. Trump was in his usual place at the head of the table. To his right sat the Vice president. Next to Mr. Vance was Susie Wiles, then John Ratcliffe, then the White House counsel, David Warrington, then Stephen Chung, who's the White House comms director. And then there's Caroline Levitt, the White House press secretary, and then General Kaine, Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio. They kept it tight. The group Mr. Hegseth and Mr. Cain ran through the sequencing of attacks. Then Mr. Trump went around the table and got everybody's views. JD Vance, whose disagreement with the whole premise was well established, addressed the President. You know, I think it's a bad idea, but if you do it, I will support you. In other words, the president asked for J.D. vance's advice. He disagreed with going in or disagreed with some element of it. We don't quite know. We're just kind of relying on the New York Times recitation. Here he goes, but whatever you do here, I'm supporting you. And the report that the New York Times said that J.D. vance said, if you're going to do it, we've got to do it hard. So if you're going to go in, we absolutely have to achieve our objectives. So we can't. No half measures. We got to decimate them. That was J.D. vance. So is there anything wrong with that, ladies and gentlemen? Is there anything wrong with being asked for your advice, giving your authentic take, and then when the President makes his decision, just going full bore on behalf of the American people? How about no, there's nothing wrong with that. That's precisely what I would expect out of a vice President or anybody else in a trusting relationship with the President of the United States. Susie Wiles told President Trump that if he felt he needed to proceed for America's national security, he should do it. John Ratcliffe offered no opinion on whether to proceed, but he discussed the stunning new intel that the Iranian leadership was about to get together. On that fateful Saturday morning, the CIA director said that the regime change was possible, depending on how we would define the term. If we mean just killing the Supreme Leader, yeah, we can probably do that. Which is why, by the way, you've heard the President say over and over the regime has changed because the old regime is dead. All the people at the top are dead. When calling on Mr. Warrington, that's the White House counsel, he just said it was all legally permissible to conduct the operation the way the President had laid it out. He didn't offer a personal opinion, but the President pressed him and he said as a Marine veteran, he knew an American service member killed by Iran years earlier. That issue was deeply personal to him. So the President asked him for his actual thoughts, and he gave them. Steven Chung warned the President about the risks of engaging in wars overseas. He said people had not voted for conflict. The plans he warned also flew in the face of what the administration had been saying about the bombing campaign against Iran last year. In other words, what we thought we destroyed their nuclear program. Why are we going in in light of the fact that the nuclear threat still exists, how can we say both things at the same time? Stephen Chung is asking, and I think the answer to that, by the way, is completely resolved. Yes, we destroyed the. The totality of their nuclear program last year set them back many years. But their ambitions to rebuild it included building a conventional missile shield to try and stop anybody from upending their nuclear development again going into the future. And so now we're trying to get all of the uranium out of the country. We want all of that material out. That's one of the details that the President's pursuing. And we get this. Caroline Levitt told the President this was of course his decision and that the press team would handle it the best that they could, which of course should be the always the way they operate. Pete Hegseth adopted a narrow position. They would have to take care of the Iranians eventually, so they might as well do it now. And he offered technical assessments. They could run the campaign in a certain amount of time with a given level of forces. General Kane was sober. He laid out the risks and what the campaign would mean for munitions depletion. In other words, what we would have to expend. He offered no opinion. His position was merely if you ordered it, we'll execute. Sounds like a general officer to me. It sounds like the kind of general officer you want around you, just neutral and non emotional advice. And then when it was his turn to speak, Marco Rubio offered more clarity. He told the President, if our goal is regime change or an uprising, we shouldn't do it. But if the goal is to destroy Iran's missile program, that's a goal we can achieve. Everybody deferred to the President's instincts no one would impede him. Quote, I think we need to do it, the president told the room aboard Air Force One the next afternoon. He gave the order. He sent it out. He said, Operation Epic Fury is approved, no aborts. Good luck. I just described to you the way a presidency is supposed to work, the way big foreign policy decisions are supposed to be conducted. The media, including the New York Times for that matter, traditionally, they often describe President Trump as impulsive, that he's just making ridiculous hip shots, that he's some out of control authoritarian, that he doesn't care about whether or not it's legal or constitutional. And what I just described to you is a guy who is considering every element in an honest, thoughtful, deliberative way. Does this fit with my goals for the American people? What is actually achievable? Is it legal? He's got the White House counsel in the room. What do all of my top advisors who I trust in this term think about this? Give me your honest assessments. And then every single one of those people, when the president made the call, they all saluted and they got to work following the president's agenda, not subverting him, working with him. This is what I voted for. That is what I voted for. I'm very, very proud of these guys. These are very big decisions. These are very high stakes decisions. And yesterday it's crystal clear that they paid off. Meaningful progress being made, massive breakthrough as the president of the United States conducts foreign policy on behalf of the rest of us. I'll get to more in just a moment. We've got a lot more to discuss, including what's going on domestically because there's a new push on Capitol Hill to betray the American people. And I'd like to put a stop to it, wouldn't you? We should do that. More ahead on this edition events. All right, let's, let's thank a great sponsor. I want to welcome to the show and thank Better Wild, which is an amazing sponsor. And here's why. You know, I'm a dog owner. I've got Major and I've got Raina. I love my dogs. I really do. And in addition to being focused on our own wellness for my family, my dogs are part of my family, too. I love these dogs and I want them to just be in great shape. And sometimes you notice, you ever notice like your dog sneezing a lot, they got the allergies or something, they just start acting up. Dog allergies often start in the gut. They'll be scratching when their digestion is out of balance. It shows up everywhere. Skin, ears, energy, and even digestion. That discovery is why I'm so happy to be connected with Better Wild's Allergy Relief soft shoes. They're great and they're designed to help support your dog's allergy defenses from the inside out instead of just covering up symptoms. Now, my dogs, they're great and they take these and they love the flavor and it's led to less itching, way more energy. Better Wild uses veterinarian approved, clinically proven ingredients. And it genuinely gives me peace of mind knowing that I'm supporting my dog's wellness at the source. So right now, Better Wild is offering you up to 40% off your order@betterwild.com Vince that's betterwild.com Vince for up to 40% off your order. Betterwild.com Vince these statements and products have not been evaluated by the fda. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any animal disease or condition. Want to also thank another great sponsor of our program, and that is Dose. You know about Dose. Dose is good. Dose is very good. You know, there's a rising level of liver health crisis all across our country right now, and for the average person, it might be hard to completely avoid. Truly modern life moves very fast. Stress is high, diets aren't perfect, and a lot of people are realizing that they need to pay closer attention to how they support their overall wellness. And more Americans are turning to gentler alternatives with ingredients that they recognize, like Coq 10, ginger, pomegranate, amla. And one of those alternatives is Dose for Cholesterol. Dose for Cholesterol is a clinically backed cholesterol support supplement. It supports triglycerides, hdl, total cholesterol levels. And people on our team have been using Dose and are very encouraged by what they've seen in their life and literally in their blood work. And we only, at this, you know, this operation, we're only talking about products that we actually use or the people around us are actually using and like. And new customers with dose can save 35% on your first month of subscriptions by going to Dose Daily Co Vince or just entering Vince at checkout. You can do that. That's D O S E D a I l y.co Vince dose Daily Co Vince for 35% off your first month subscription. These statements and products have not been evaluated by the FDA and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease or condition. All right, yes, we need regime change in the US Senate says Raccoon 66. Is it Raccoon or Arkoon? Arcoon, maybe? Yeah. Anyway. Yeah, Major's in the house. Hello, Major. What's up, buddy? Major stop by? Major heard me talking about him. Let me see. Can I give us. Give you a. Give you a. A major cam of some kind here. Let's see. For those of you, this is a rumble exclusive. To be able to see Major Majors in the house. Major, right here. Please, please. Sit down. Good boy. Good boy. Look at Mage. Sit down, buddy. You got it. You gotta keep getting your face into the camera, man. There you go. Look at that. He's a star. He's a star. I love Major. Now, Major's really good. He's a. He's a great dog. He's so funny. We had company last night. And if you ever come over to my house, Major will roll over in front of you and just push his body up against you. He's. He's. He's not gonna kill anybody. I have to admit, like, I'm pretty sure if somebody broke into my house, this dog is straight up just gonna hug him. My other dog, Raina, will go ballistic. She's like a. She's an alarm. She's just. She'll go nuts. But Majors, a. Major's a lover. Major's a lover, not a fighter. Good. Good dog. All right, let's talk about problems. I got a problem. It's Capitol Hill. On Capitol Hill, there's a plot afoot to hand out amnesty to illegal aliens. Now, for those of you who've been with me for some time, you've already heard me talk about this. This. This massive, idiotic legislation. It's called the Dignidad Act. The Dignity. I know you're dignidot. What is Dignidot? Dignidad is Spanish for dignity. It's Spanish. They named the legislation Dignity. Now, again, we talked about this some time ago. I want to. I want to say it was February of this year. We reviewed this with you, and this gigantic, flaming pile of garbage is the brainchild of a Florida Republican congresswoman, you heard me correctly, called Maria Salazar. Maria Salazar. And she's been gathering. I don't know, how has this even happened? She's been gathering ahead of steam here with 20 Republicans and 20 Democrats in the House all co sponsoring a piece of legislation to give amnesty to illegal aliens and then scolding anyone who calls it amnesty this week. The fact that this bill exists just got kind of a lot of attention, thanks to a lefty X post From a guy called Brian Allen. He posted this. He said breaking. 20 Republicans and 20 Democrats just co sponsored the Dignity act, the first serious bipartisan immigration bill in decades. It's not serious. F that noise. It's not serious. It's a scam. It's a sellout, what it actually does, says Brian. Then he lies to you. No amnesty, no citizenship. Those are lies, by the way. Right away, no handouts. That's a lie. A pathway to legal work status for long term undocumented immigrants who meet strict requirements, fully funded by restitution payments from immigrants themselves requiring zero taxpayer dollars. Mike Lawler, also a Republican's own words. This is not amnesty. It's accountability. It's fairness. It's dignity. It's a scam. It's a scam is what it is. And it's infuriating that we have to keep putting fires out on our own side. What is wrong with you people? What a bunch of sellouts. So Brandon Gill is a great congressman. He's proven himself to be great Democrat, great. Excuse me, great Republican congressman from Texas. He's producer Jim's congressman, actually. And Brandon Gill said the following. The Dignity act is mass amnesty and it would constitute a terrible betrayal of our voters. A terrible betrayal. Yeah. What did you vote for in 2024? Was it amnesty? I'm pretty sure it was mass deportations. It wasn't amnesty. It was the exact opposite of that. Brandon Gill correctly assessing this would be a terrible betrayal of American voters. Lots of them. The majority of them. The popular vote in the United States of America. Maria Salazar is freaking out about it. She's mad that Brandon Gill called her out. Good. Go ahead, keep freaking out. I love that she freaked out. You know why? Because the freak out that she has on display right now is calling more attention to the betrayal that she's manufacturing. Listen to this woman. She types in all capital letters, puts a period between every word like a child. Read the bill before you open your mouth. She writes angry at Brandon. Calling the Dignity act amnesty isn't just wrong, it's a deliberate distortion. It exposes just how little you know about the bill. This is enforcement first. Zero tolerance for criminals, permanent border security. Hard earned requirements to step forward and face the law so American workers are protected, not undercut. Amnesty is the chaos you've defended. What? Amnesty is the chaos Brandon Gill has defended. Millions in the shadows. No control, no accountability in a system that stopped working a long time ago. Brandon Gill supports enforcing the law. You colossal liar. Who is this woman? She's pushing amnesty and then accusing those of us who want to deport illegals of being for amnesty. This is projection. This is classic left wing projection coming out of the mouth of a nominal Republican. You're for amnesty if you support the status quo. I don't support the status quo. I'm done with the status quo. I support the rule of law. Get the hell out of my country. If you're here illegally, if you break my laws, you've gotta go. Consequence culture, that's what we call it. You need to have the consequences imposed upon you. Accusing me of supporting amnesty. It's laughable. That's psychotic. As you push amnesty and then accuse everybody else of being for amnesty. Nice. No shortcuts, no giveaways, no blanket forgiveness. That's law and order. That's dignity, she says. So this, what you just heard, was a series of lies. Let me. Let me just start with video of Maria Salazar, though. I want you to hear directly out of her own lying mouth that the whole point of this operation is to give citizenship to illegal aliens. Here's Maria Salazar. Where did she admit this? Huh? Where was this? Oh, it was at the World freaking economic forum in 2023. Watch Congresswoman Salazar check it out.
