
In this episode, I blow the lid off the newest leftist/media talking point, the truth behind the activist judges who are continuing the lawfare effort against President Trump, a massive win for Rumble and free speech, and more.
Loading summary
Dan Bongino
Get ready to hear the truth about America on a show that's not immune to the facts. With your host, Dan Von G. When is it going to stop? When? When? When is the f o ing gonna stop? The answer is never. It's never gonna stop. The f o ing is never gonna stop. See the fa'd now, the foe in the show. I'm gonna start today the show which I typically don't do. I ease you into the fo because there's so much fo ing. I don't want to overload and redline your foing tachometer. I just don't want to do it. But because it's a Thursday and I'm feeling particularly good today, Evita's show at a tremendous audience. I made a little guest appearance for those of you want to watch. What is it? Bungee report. I mean, rumble.com/bongino report. You can watch Evita show. Rumble.com/evita. Check that show out. You're going to love it. I made a little guest appearance. She went late today and I was like, they're still here, so might as well come on the show. I am in a mood today. The f owing is just glorious. I got that. And another one of those segments where if you're here in the Dan Bongino show, you are again at least a week ahead of the news cycle. I will prove it to you right in the beginning of the show where even the Bongino army language is now being stolen. The exact words Today show sponsored by Beam. Get some sleep. Go to shop beam.com bongino use code bongino for 47% off your first order. Today's show is also brought to you by Patriot Mobile. Listen, we won the election, but the fight to restore this amazing nation is only beginning. Now's the time to take a stand in that parallel economy and support companies that support us. Patriot Mobile. They are America's only Christian conservative wireless provider. Patriot Mobile offers a way to vote with your wallet without compromising on quality or convenience. Patriot Mobile isn't just about providing exceptional cell phone service. It's a call to action to defend our rights and our freedoms. With Patriot Mobile, you'll get outstanding nationwide coverage because they operate on all three major networks. If you have cell phone service today, you can get cell phone service with Patriot Mobile with a coverage guarantee. But the difference is this. Every dollar you spend with Patriot Mobile supports a company that believes in the first and Second Amendments, the sanctity of life and our veterans and first responders switching is easy. Keep your number, keep your phone or upgrade. Their 100%. US based customer support team will help you find the perfect plan. Right now, go to patriot mobile.com dan or call 972-PATRIOT and get a free month of service with promo code. Dan, switch to Patriot Mobile today. Defend freedom with every call and text you make, visit patriot mobile.com dan or call 972 Patriot. All right, fellas, let's go. We got a lot to talk about. Let's just start right off the bat, right out of the gate, like those little dog races they have down here in Florida. Boom. Chasing a rabbit. Let's go with some fo ing right away. Here is our am Attorney General, Madam Pam Bondi. Madam Attorney General, she had a couple of words for Twinkies and Letitia James up in New York who have used their power indiscriminately to weaponize government and target their political opponents. This is not going well for them. This is not going well and it's just begun. Check this out.
Pam Bondi
We're here today because we have filed charges against the state of New York. We have filed charges against Kathy Hochul. We have filed charges against Letitia James and Mark Schroeder, who is with dmv. This is a new doj and we are taking steps to protect Americans, American citizens and angel moms. Like the mom standing right behind me who you're going to hear from in a moment. New York has chosen to prioritize illegal aliens over American citizens. It stops. It stops today.
Dan Bongino
Yes, it does. Yes, it does. You see what happens? This is what happens when you take that boulder at the top of the hill and you push it downhill and trade your potential energy for kinetic energy. What winds up happening is you get run over by it, too. So the Democrats thought it would be a good idea to weaponize the mechanics of government, the state, federal and local level, to target Donald Trump. Now, the attorney general, thankfully, isn't doing that. The attorney general is just enforcing the law. The Democrats, of course, will say this is weaponizing government as they fo. And believe me, they're foing. But we have rules. We have rules. We have a border. That border says you can't enter this country unless you go through that port of entry. If you break those rules, you are here what chat stirs illegally? Yes. You. You are an alien to the country who is here illegally, making you an illegal alien. If you harbor those illegal aliens, do anything to obstruct justice, you may have some civil or potentially criminal liability. You See how the left doesn't like that. The difference is they target us for fake crimes that don't exist. Like fictitious Trump bank fraud cases where there's no actual victim and the bank wants to do more business with Trump and yet we target them for actual crimes they commit where they break the law and they get really upset. Weaponized government. The foing continued. I got way too much foing. Thank you Madam Attorney General. We appreciate it. Right out of the chute getting started. It's not going to stop the foing. Boulders running down the hill right now. Wall Street Journal Judge lifts the freeze on Trump's Buyout plan for federal workers Judge Bongino is right again. What did I, what I, what I tell you guys about the judge stuff and illegal cases? Your boy Dan, right? I'm just little part of this Bongino army. I'm not the general. I don't want to be the general. I'm not interested in that. I'm interested in being one of you. I'm not trying to be anything special, but I'm not going to waste your freakin time. I just told you the other day, don't lose your marbles over these legal cases. The left sues about everything all the time. It's why they love to stack the bench with liberal judges. Happens all the time. I told you, we're going to win some and we're going to lose some. But the bottom line is it's asymmetric warfare and asymmetric benefiting us. For liberals, that means a lack of symmetry, meaning one side is greater than the other. Why? Because the federal government is doing federal government stuff, which they're paid to do. President Trump is paid as the commander in chief and the chief of the executive branch to execute. That's what he's doing. You're paying him. It's no sweat off his back. The left wing organizations suing in every courtroom in America are wasting time and money. Even if they win two out of every hundred cases, we won 98. And Donald Trump is going to be more powerful in the end and be able to finally execute the role of the chief executive. I get it folks. The left pisses a lot of people off with their legal warfare. But there is an upside to it. There is an upside to it. They are going to lose a significant number of these cases and they're going to be iced out from pursuing that same legal avenue again. They're wasting a lot of time, folks. Here it is again too. What is two thumbs. That doesn't waste your time. This guy, Sorry, what? Has no thumbs and always waste your time. I have no thumbs but a big head and I waste your freaking time all the time. Your boys for gazing. I don't waste your time. When the Trump Gaza thing happened, gee, what was it, a week ago now it's like Trump is in like dog years. Don't you right folks? Am I crazy, folks? In the chat, yes or no? But you know, on the case, yes or no? Trump's operating in political dog years, right? He does so much so fast. He does something a week ago, it feels like seven years ago, right? Big shout out there to Fugazi in the chat, the infamous 88 guy. And they lowered flags to half master. Nobody's really talking about it because we're not crazy like you, bro. That's why Trump is operating in political dog years. The Gaza thing was like a week and a half ago. It feels like it was 10 years ago. What did I tell you guys last week? This is not a self celebratory moment. I want you to see how the media, when I say things to you like we are the media now and they follow us. Some people still go, I don't really. Okay, what was the word I used last week when Trump came out and he said, hey, the United States is going to have a role in Gaza and the whole world flipped out and I told you the press is overreacting and they're going to look like buffoons. They're hyperventilating and watch. I said Trump stakes out the maximalist position every single time. He does it as a debating point because he wants people shaken up and he wants people to fix the problem on their own and, and if they can't, Big daddy comes in and does it for him. Look at this. Axios, February 13th. I believe that's today. Although I could be wrong on the day. It's not Friday the 13th, it's Thursday. Masculine maximalism, I'm not telling you like this. Somebody didn't make up the word, but it kind of sounds like something we said a week ago. Let me keep this up for a second. Did we not have this conversation, fellas? Yes, we did. They say Trump and Musk believe powerfully in maximalist action language. That was like the show we did a week and a half ago, right? I mean, using the like exact word and stuff. But notice how typical left wingers at Axios notice how they have to inject a race angle for Gaza. Yes. Let me read on. Trump and Musk believe powerfully in Maximalist action and language carried out by strong but mostly white men as. As blunt, uncompromising instruments to prove new limits both to power and what's possible. Oh, my gosh, Axios. Can you just footnote us, please? Can you just at least provide a link to the show? Just as a courtesy. Just as a courtesy, you know, I'm saying, bro, there's a courtesy. And then what else did we say last week? Why are we doing this segment? We are the media now. He group hug. Group on. Gino, hug. Everybody in the chat here. My phone. Everybody in the chat. See, I'm watching you guys on my phone right now. Everybody in the chat. Group hug. Sometimes I chat go so fast I had to scroll down. I think I missed some stuff. Who said it? John DiSalvo in the chat. We are the media. You're damn right we are. We are the media now. Big ass group hug for everyone. Hug, bro, who just said that? Hug, please. In McGroin. I hope you're pleasing it, please. But yes. And then they note in Axios again, exactly what we said last week, that Trump takes the maximalist position because he plays the media like a fiddle, knowing they will overreact to his maximalist position. Look at this. Axios, a week later. Just footnote us, guys, one time. Maybe an endnote. Both men like to provoke outrage and outrageous responses. That makes Trump and Musk the center of the national conversation and Bates hyperventilating critics into outrageous responses. Anybody know what I call that? The show your theory. Show your what? It's the damn Bongino show your ass theory. Take a maximalist position. You may or may not mean. Watch the media hyperventilate. Watch more media people. Watch the hyperventilation and hyperventilate even more so you don't lose your subscribers and satisfy your crazy audience and keep showing your ass to people which they don't want to see. The media, governments, what would you say? Jordan, Colombia, now the Saudis. Oh, Justin's like other governments. That's such a beautiful segue. It's like he knew what was coming next. What did I tell you? Donald Trump is not going to occupy Gaza with the military. He's implying that because people in the region want to get off their ass and actually fix Gaza, which has been a problem for like 7,000 years and no one wants to do shit. So Donald Trump comes in and goes, hey, we're going to take over Gaza. Everybody goes, oh, my gosh, heads are on fire, people are pissing in their diapers. Everybody goes crazy and Then what comes out a couple of days later? Look at. Oh my gosh, this is insane. Arab states wake up to the fact that that Trump means what he says on Gaza. Look at this, Justin. So nuts. Egypt, guys, has actually launched a diplomatic blitz to corral support for an Arab led initiative to rebuild the Gaza Strip. Show's over, Joe. What's the point of the show? You knew this a week ago. You just heard what's the point? What's the point of the show? What's the point of doing a show? What is this? Oh, look how great. What did I tell you last week? Do you remember the words we used last week? He's trying to get the partners in the region to do something. It's almost like we were in Trump's head because now partners in the region are doing something. It's not blackout today. Today it's just water. I'm too wired up already. I may black out. I may just teeter over on the desk. I had it this morning, man. Seriously, brothers and sisters, you know I love you guys, right? There's gonna be a lot of stuff happening in the coming weeks, okay? Hang with me. I'm never gonna steer you wrong. Do not get baited into the hyperventilating, ridiculous sponsors these left wing media lunatics are. The reason we are the media now is precisely because we don't do that. We make accurate, fact based predictions about what Trump is going to do based on what he's done in the past. We describe his strategy and we are weeks ahead of the game. All right, moving on. Ladies and gentlemen, what's old is new again. Whereas you and I in this army, MAGA army, Spongino army out there, whereas you and I, we have this expression in the Secret service called lift and shift. You know, something changes out of sight, you don't have time to whine about it. Well, the protect, he said he was going to go left and he went right. Well, freaking fix it. It doesn't matter. You can't get him shot in the head because he took a wrong turn. Okay, Lift and shift. The difference with the MAGA crowd is we are very good at adopting to media conspiracy theories and general scumbaggery. We're just good at it. That's why we're the media now. The media is not. The media keeps regurgitating the exact same strategy. And it's the old banging your head on the desk and you know, wondering why your head hurts. Okay? They cannot change. It is impossible. I'm going to prove it to you right now, big, fat, juicy hat tip to the Media Research Center. Kicking ass and taking names, always. You got to follow them news busters. Absolutely amazing group over there. Follow them on X, Facebook and elsewhere. They put together this little one minute compilation, proving to you the media cannot change. They will not change. They will continue to get wrecked. Because for them, what's old is new again. This constitutional crisis thing they're talking about right now with Donald Trump in his first three weeks as the president, you think any of this is new? For those of you listening on audio only, Apple and Spotify, what you're going to hear in the beginning is 2016, 2015, that election cycle, and then you're going to hear later, 2020. And there's a crazy thing about what you're gonna hear. It all sounds the same because it is. Check this out.
Justin
They are fomenting a constitutional crisis. Are we staring down the barrel of a constitutional crisis? This is an existential constitutional crisis.
Dan Bongino
We're now like one subway stop from a real constitutional crisis.
Justin
We are in, in effect, a constitutional crisis.
Pam Bondi
Warnings of an impending constitutional crisis ripped through the nation's capital.
Justin
There are experts who are saying this.
Dan Bongino
Is a constitutional crisis.
Justin
We are at a dangerous time in our history. A constitutional crisis.
Pam Bondi
New warnings of a constitutional crisis.
Dan Bongino
Just weeks into Trump's second term, the.
Justin
Stage is set for a constitutional crisis.
Pam Bondi
Could this signal the start of a constitutional crisis? Legal experts say our country could be.
Justin
Headed toward a constitutional crisis.
Dan Bongino
Why are we better than them at their own business and media? Because we lift and shift. We adopt and I mean, this is a positive. We're like Plato. We. We adjust and adopt to pressure points. Not these idiots. They don't have it in them. They have this show your ass thing where they have to continue to show their ass to the American people, even though everyone's like, please stop. I don't want to see that. They can't. They're engaged in an extinction burst of behavior. They simply can't stop. Thank you to the guy who tweeted the Coke machine to me the other day. You get it, by the way? More foing. Looks like it just happened. I can't even keep up. Thank you, guys. Look at. These guys are so fast. RFK has now been confirmed. Tulsi last night. This is during the show. It's just an endless litany of fo ing. It never, ever stops. You know, guys, I do it too, but if there was ever. Oh, my gosh. Put them up in the chat. Come on, come on. Get on it. Bongito. Army. It's Karate man up in the chat. You think we get Eddie Murphy sometime as a guest on the show? Guys, you think he would do actual Karate Man? Jasmine, look into that. See if we can get Eddie Murphy and see if he'll come in, reach out, tell him we've made a. We've made a little giphy about Karate Man. Maybe he'll come on. I doubt it, but I don't know if he does politics. Oh, my gosh, that Chad. You guys, my phone is actually smoking right now. Oh yeah, we can't forget Kylo Ren either, can we? Can we do the Kylo Ren? You know, we've been leaving poor Kylo behind. We haven't said that in a long time, ladies and gentlemen. Now we got rfk, we got Trump. We got three weeks of the media pissing in their pants. It's time for more more. Always more More is never enough. When enough is enough, it's not enough. When you think enough is enough, it's time for more. When you said I've had enough more, it's time for more. When you hit more, it's time for more. When it's more, you hit more risk. But then that's not a word. It is a word in the Bongino army. We just made it up. More, more, always more, never less, always more. Keep them guessing. Rock em sock em baby all the time, never stop. And guy, can I right guy. This sucker still is not broken. Amazing. I'm not even a crack in this. Rock em sock em. Someone sent me a picture. A friend of mine, last night a text. Someone went out and bought a Rock em sock em robots and did the same thing, put the Trump face on it. And they said, can you send this picture to Dan Bongino? So that friend. I got the picture. Pretty funny. One quick thing before this break. I want to play this too. This is again why we keep winning and we are the media. Now. Trump has hired the freaking Avengers. He's hired the X Men, he's got rfk, he's got Tulsi, he's got Ratcliffe at CIA. He's got Ellis as the deputy at CIA. He's got cash coming in at FBI. The More continues, it is not going to stop. He also has the best press secretary I've seen and I can't believe it. She's even better than I thought and I knew she was good. This constitutional crisis bullshit. You think she was going to let this go at the briefing yesterday? No, she wasn't. Check this out.
Pam Bondi
Many Outlets in this room have been fear mongering the American people into believing there is a constitutional crisis taking place here at the White House. I've been hearing those words a lot lately. But in fact, the real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branches, where district court judges in liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block President Trump's basic executive authority. We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law. And they have issued at least 12 injunctions against this administration in the past 14 days, often without citing any evidence or grounds for their lawsuits. This is part of a larger concerted effort by Democrat activists and nothing more than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against President Trump.
Dan Bongino
I love my wife to death and in the most platonic way possible. We love you, Karen. We all love you. We all love you, Justin. Do you love her? She's amazing. He said love. Very platonic. We don't want to be weird. We love you. Woman's amazing. You think she's going to let this constitutional crisis crap go? No, she's not. No. Just like the freakin Avengers. Press secretary. If Captain America had a press secretary. Look like Caroline Levitt. By the way, Liberty Josh gave a $50 tip in the chat. I'll say it again, but I know it doesn't matter. Thank you, Liberty Josh. Save your money, folks. I appreciate it. You're the best. If you want to give a tip, if it makes you feel good, it makes me feel good. However, I. We do not ever request tips on the show. I just want you to understand that. Thank you. We never do. We don't. Yes, right. Send the check to Guy and Jet. They'll take it. I don't need it. I appreciate it. I do the show for you. I don't do it for the money. Money's nice, but you guys are great. Thank you, Liberty Josh, that was very generous of you. Appreciate it, but totally unnecessary. It was big shocker in the briefing room yesterday, too. I kind of got some wind. It may happen from a friend of mine, not related to it, but I want to show you that I got a lot more to get to. We've got to take a quick break. We'll get back to the show. And I just want you to remember the Trump theory, too. Before we get to the next segment, Trump always asks the question, why are we doing this? A question never asked in government. That's what's confusing a lot of people. Folks, you ever have a cheat meal? I did the other day. You know, I'm sitting there, I'm watching the Auburn basketball game and once a month or so I will just destroy myself with a cheat meal. I ate an entire pizza, no cheese. I'm grossly lactose intolerant by myself. Why the hell am I telling you that? Because honestly, I didn't feel bad about it. I got right on track the next day with my diet because I take field of greens. I take it twice a day. I've been taking it forever. You know, this company was one of my first sponsors because I love this company. It's called Brickhouse Nutrition. They make the highest quality nutritional supplements out there. Fielder Greens is spectacular. What is is ground versus. They have a doctor and a bunch of researchers. They figured out a fruit and vegetable combination where they could ground it up into a great tasting powder. And you basically can make your way around the supermarket, get the healthy, wholesome fruits and vegetables without having to cook everything. You just take a scoop, put it in your favorite drink. I put it in green tea. We put it whatever you want, Water, protein, shakes, doesn't matter. I love the energy I get with Field of greens, but I love the confidence that even if I have one of those cheat days, I can enjoy it guilt free because my blood work is spectacular. And I already showed you what my doctor told me. He sent me a text saying, whatever you're doing with the field of greens, keep it going. Only Fielder greens makes you this better health. Promise your doctor will notice your improved health or your money back. Can't get a better deal than that. Let me get you started on my special discount. 20% off your first order. Just use code dan@brickhouseknutrition.com Dan Pick up field of greens. I like the wild berry. Lemon lime is great too. Brickhouse nutrition.com dan use code dan all right, back to the show, folks. I got a little emotional on the air. Didn't have to turn in my man card. There were no tears involved, but there could have been. Once in a while, eyes get a little moist. Yesterday was a big day for me. You know, we've been involved in this free speech fight for a long time at Rumble. And the CEO of Rumble, you know him, he is a hero of mine. He really is. His name is Chris Pavlovsky. He's not a big media guy. He doesn't go out and do a ton of media appearances or anything like that. He's a quiet, unassuming, behind the scenes guy. But when you look up what Rumble did in Countries overseas when they said to Rumble, I demand you censor this guy. You know what Chris said? Not on our. We're pulling out of your entire country. You're pulling out of an entire country to defend one creator. And you know what Chris said? We are. Because if we're going to stand for free speech, that one creator is every creator. I want you to understand how this guy is. He doesn't go out and shout from the rafters how great he is. He doesn't pound the table all the time. And he's a guy who frequently gets overlooked. And I'm telling you this for a freaking fact. That I'm an investor in his company has nothing to do with it at all. This guy is a hero to free speech. Who cares? Dan, why are you bringing this up today? Because the Trump White House is loyal and they are loyal to people who stood with them. When Donald Trump was de platformed everywhere because of fake bullshit charges, they wiped him out, folks. Twitter, Facebook, everywhere. There was one person who stood with him and got massive pressure, and that was Chris at Rumble. And this happened yesterday. You see the White House new media seat. There's a man, Chris, walking in. He got to ask the first question yesterday, which was of course about censorship. And Caroline Levitt knocked it out of park. Play that again. Look at it. Give me a little. Still there. Look at that guy. He's a good man. Folks, do me a favor, go find him on X TrueSocial, Chris Pavlovsky from Rumble, and give him a follow. Good for you, Chris. He doesn't go bragging about what he did, but I want you to remember that when everybody censored Donald Trump, that guy right there said, not on my watch. You're going to speak on our channel and we're going to stand by you. God bless you, brother. I want you to remember something. Donald Trump does something no politician I've ever seen. I'm not telling you. He doesn't exist. And I'm talking globally, by the way. May I just don't know him or her. No politician I know has ever done what Donald Trump does, which is ask a very simple question. Hey, why are we doing this? Why are we doing this? I ran into a guy a long time ago when I was running for office. He was a. He was a county executive in Howard County. This guy, Chuck, nice guy. I think he passed. But he told me something once. It was very powerful about government. He said, don't ever forget with government that there's no power in. Yes. If you tell people yes. They have no reason to bribe you. You get the point. You want to tell people no. That way they come to the table with, you know, campaign funds to basically bribe you to getting to yes. Government will always grow because there's no power in telling people yes. You want to tell people no. So that government grows and bureaucracies grow because there's power in. Donald Trump is the first guy in eons, the first guy in a long time to say to people, wait, why the hell are we doing this? I could give you 100 examples. Gaza, the Abraham Accords, moving the embassy to Jerusalem. Remember what the Abraham Accords? They told them, you can't get any peace deal in the Middle east, any kind of economic accords between these two countries. You can't solve the Palestinian issue. He said, I'm just going to try anyway. And it was crazy. He actually did it. This is important because he's doing it again and he's doing it through his deputies in the Cabinet, one of them being our now excellent Defense Secretary, Secretary Pete Hegseth. Pete's overseas right now, and Pete is shaken up and mean. If there's an apple cart, this guy's tossing it over. He's like, hey, Naito. Which is, of course, is our alliance with other countries designed to defend against the prior Soviet Union and Warsaw Pact. He's saying, with Naito, I think it's grossly unfair that the United States is paying all of this money to defend you guys when you guys are the ones at risk from a Russian invasion like Ukraine and you're not paying as much yourself. You're looking at. That makes sense. No one said it before Trump. Here's Pete saying, you know what? 2% of GDP for defense, that's not enough. We want 5. You're damn right we do. And the world is losing their minds. I'll show you what I mean coming up next. But check this out.
Justin
First part of this is speaking frankly.
Dan Bongino
With your people about how this threat can only be met by spending more on defense. 2% is not enough. President Trump has called for 5%. And I agree. Increasing your commitment to your own security is a down payment for the future.
Justin
A down payment, as you said, Mr. Secretary, of Peace through strength.
Dan Bongino
We're also here today to directly and unambiguously express that stark strategic realities prevent the United States of America from being.
Justin
Primarily focused on the security of Europe.
Dan Bongino
To all the people who lost their minds over this, again in the quote from Axios, hyperventilating media. My gosh, this is crazy. We're not defending NATO. NATO's not defending Naito. What are you talking about? The United States is not the world's policeman on the corner. We're not. I'm sorry. There's a whole rest of the globe out there that's very wealthy. God bless Secretary Hegseth and Donald Trump. Notice what he did. They're going towards here, what Pete just alluded to. The United States is focused on defending the United States, quote, not primarily focused on Europe. Why is this a surprise to Europe? We may help you, we may not. But we're not. We're not your military. We're the United States. Doesn't mean you're the enemy. Why did I play that? Cut? I read something in the Wall Street Journal the other day. Folks, please stop what you're doing and pay attention to this, because if you are one of those old school Republicans, you're welcome here, by the way. I don't. We have a lot of different diverse views, but if you're one of those old national security hawk Republicans, that's fine. We're saying we need to support NATO even if NATO doesn't support themselves. Did you read this op ed in the Wall Street Journal that should have been on the front page of every newspaper? Because it shook me to my soul that this guy would have the balls to write this. Here's Anders Fogg Rasmussen, a very influential international diplomat. NATO, Denmark, everything, right? He writes this article called the World's policeman, referring to us Goes rogue. So I see this headline, I'm like, really? Listen to this shit. He's talking about the European Union. He's like, we must build a coalition of willing European countries that are prepared to provide a robust European defense. Okay, wow, great. Look at that. We should strengthen the European Union's security dimension. Move to majority voting to prevent pro Russia members from vetoing security measures and sign a security agreement between the EU and UK as soon as possible to protect ourselves and our shared critical infrastructure. You're probably like, wow, Dan, that sounds great. You know who he's talking about defending himself against us. The world's policeman goes rogue. He's referring to us. Now, you're probably thinking in the chat. So Russia invades Ukraine. NATO does very little. Not all, but a lot of countries did nothing to defend actual NATO. Donald Trump's like, I need NATO to defend Naito and the NATO countries in the eu. You're like, now we need to defend against the United States. What is. What is. What am I in. Is this, like, crazy pills territory? Read the whole piece. If you think I'm crazy and I'm in any way misreading this, Anders Fogg Rasmussen. Hey, man, you're toying with the wrong people. This is the biggest MAGA show out there. What goes here goes right through ripples through the MAGA sphere. You don't want to defend yourselves when the Russians invade, but now you want to defend yourself and, quote, build up security measures because you're worried about defending yourself against the rogue United States. Is this even real? Oh, boy. You see how that apple cart boom and everybody's losing their mind. Here's a simple solution, Anders. If you want us to be a critical part of NATO and spend trillions of dollars defending you guys, then maybe you should spend the same amount of money, at least as a percentage of gdp, defending yourself. Just. Just an idea, bro. They need to pay their fair share. Pay the. Pay them. Thank you. We should. We should incorporate the left wing euphemisms here. You need to pay your fair share. Definitely need to pay your fair share. I like that. Very. Just creative. Justin. Very. See, you're good at this. You may have to give your own show the. Justin. What do you say? Belial. Is that like French or something? You get him his own show. What do you think? A Justin show. We'll start in the weekend. He'll start covering Star wars and stuff first. He loves that. Him and Gi, they can talk all they want about the Millennium Falcon and the mechanics of lightspeed. They love that stuff. They actually starting to convince me Rogue One is a good movie, which I never thought I'd say, but I say they may not be wrong. I got a couple breaks here. I got to take Just quickly here, last break, but I want to get to this next, folks. We're living in a post truth world now. That's why spreadsheets. Donald Trump hurts them. What? Spreadsheets. Donald Trump. Donald Trump asks questions all the time, like he does about NATO, Gaza, the Abraham Accords. Why are we doing this? It doesn't work. That may sound simple to you. It's not. Politicians and media people are not used to that. That's why we're in this post truth world. And I'll show you what I mean coming up in a minute with this Adam Schiff segment that is so hard to believe. It's hard to believe this segment actually happened, folks. It said that four companies control over 80% of the meat industry. And reports say China now controls the largest portion of US Pork. These companies are using tactics to crush American family farms with the additives they're putting into our food and American are stuck with sketchy meat. So what can we do about it? Here's a company that comes out swinging on behalf of American family farms and food security. Moink M o I n K they sent me a good sample of their meats. Absolutely incredible. We fell in love right away. Said come on board guys, we'd love to have you. Moist meat comes from animals raised outdoors. They deliver meat straight to your doorsteps at prices you can actually afford. Born, raised and harvested right here in the usa. They sent me the product. We absolutely loved it. We've been eating the product three out of five nights of the week and the other two were just out on the road. That's why it's amazing. It makes a difference in the meals for my family. Support American family farms. Join the Moink movement today@moinkbox.com bongino right now and get free wings for life. That's right, the best wings you'll ever taste for free but for a limited time. Spelled M o I n k moinkbox.com Bongino that's moinkbox.com BongIno Check them out. And our last sponsor, we get back to the show, Beam. You want a good night's sleep. Let me introduce you to another one of their great products, Beam Dream Capsules. The dream capsules contain the same ingredients I've been telling you about to get a good quality restful night's sleep. Beam is proudly founded in America run by people who share our values, hard work, integrity and delivering results. Its science backed nighttime blend packed with ingredients shown to improve sleep so you wake up refreshed and ready to bounce into the show like I do every day. Dream is made with a powerful all natural blend of reishi, magnesium, L theanine, epigenin and melatonin. Beam's helped improve over 17 and a half million nights of sleep, helping people across the country wake up and feel great. Here's the deal. Beam is giving you, the listeners the ultimate patriot discount of 47% off. Why not 45? Because they wanted 47. You get it. Try their best selling dream capsules and get up to 47% off for a limited time. Go to shop beam.com bongino use code bongino a checkout that shop b e a m.com bongino use code BONGINO for up to 47% of support. Patriotic American Company get a good night's sleep. Thank you Beam. Back to the show. So Donald Trump's a spreadsheets guy, folks. He asks these crazy questions like, why the are we doing that? That doesn't seem to make sense. And the government's like, because that's the way we've always done it. But that way sucks. I remember my last job, I was like, why do we do these protest zone things? Because that's the way we've always done it. And some judges like, hey, that's unconstitutional. Ok, we're not going to do it that way. Why does the government do it the way it's always done? Because the government has no incentive to change anything ever, because it's not their money and they're not even buying anything for themselves. Trump's not having any of that. Contrast Trump's brutal honesty in his spreadsheet style about his with his opponents here who not only are not plus one minus one spreadsheets. Why are we doing that, guys? But keep doing the same stupid thing over and over again, like trotting out morons like Adam Schiff, who has zero credibility whatsoever. Here is Adam Schiff on MSNBC and a segment, folks, that is honestly hard to believe. I mean it. Here he is, Adam Schiff, who was on the Intel Committee promoting lies about Russia collusion and Hunter Biden laptops, forever commenting on Tulsi Gabbard running the DNI office. And he comments that she's not qualified because she wasn't on the Intel Committee and, and talked about Russian biolabs. This is real. This actually happened. Check this out.
Pam Bondi
You spoke tonight on the Senate floor.
Justin
In opposition to her confirmation. You called it dangerous and a five alarm fire. What do you think the American people should know about her as a nominee as we're heading toward that final vote tomorrow? Well, first, I think it's important, as with all these nominees, to just level set. Normally, if you're talking about someone who's going to head an agency, let alone in this case all of the intelligence agencies, you would expect a nominee to have some experience, maybe having worked for an intelligence agency, maybe having led an intelligence agency, or even at a minimum served on a relevant committee like the Intelligence Committee in Congress. Tulsi Gabbard has none of that experience. Zero, nada, Zilcho. That would normally in a normal world be disqualifying. But she goes far beyond that. She has echoed Kremlin talking points about the origin of the war against Ukraine. She's pushed out Russian propaganda about US biolabs in Ukraine.
Dan Bongino
This is, I want you understand why I had to put this in the show, because I do these shows and I structure them this way for a reason. I love foils and contrasts. So you've got hard truth spreadsheets, Donald Trump, right where he'll speak the truth to you and some people don't even want to hear it. That is Arab world partners in the Middle East. Hey, fix Gaza or daddy's coming in to fix it. What are you talking about? We're working on it for 50 years. Exactly. That's the problem. That's Donald Trump. The truth to the point where it hurts people. I mean, hurts the liberal, like emotionally hurt. They can't take that. They don't want the truth. They hyperventilate, they lose their minds. They don't want to be told other countries are ripping us off with tariffs. They're not interested. Contrast that with Adam Schiff and Rachel Maddow. She this is a major cable news show. It's amazing people still watch it. Adam Schiff is talking about how Tulsi's unqualified because she's not on the Intel Committee. I want to note that Adam Schiff was on the intel committee when he went on Tucker Carlson show on Fox and said this about a 20 times. Debunked absurd Russian collusion, pee pee hoax and had no problem at all lying to the American people. Contrast that with hard truth. Donald Trump, check this out.
Justin
You don't know that the government. I think it's really irresponsible for you to say, you know that the government. You know what is irresponsible, Tucker, for you to make that claim without looking at the evidence. And more importantly, you can't say that, you know, the Putin government. More importantly for the president elect today to say that you're dodging. He doesn't know whether the Russians. Look, you're on the intel Committee. Let me just ask you one final question. Can you look right into the camera and say I know for a fact the government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hacks of John Podesta's email? Absolutely. The government of Vladimir Putin was behind the hacks of our institution and the dumping of information of John Podesta's email. Not only in the United States, of John Podesta's email, but also in Europe. Okay, you're not, you know what you're dodging, Ed. Tucker, I know they did John Po's email. They hacked us. And I think that Ronald Reagan is rolling over. Ronald Reagan, you're carrying water for the Kremlin.
Dan Bongino
Carrying water for the.
Justin
You're making, look, you're a sitting member of Congress on the insult Committee. And you can't say they hawk hacked. You're gonna. You're gonna have to move your shoulder to RT Russian television. Because you know what? This is perfect. This is beneath your office because it's so dumb and you're being duplicitous.
Dan Bongino
This is why you really need to embrace being part of this MAGA army and be proud of it. Big group hugs. You live in the. In the actual realpolitik world where, yes, it hurts to hear some of this stuff. It hurts to hear that NATO doesn't want to defend itself, but wants us to defend Naito. It hurts to hear other countries have been ripping us off or nobody's happy about that. But it's real and we've got to fix it. It hurts to hear that the regional partners have done squat for Gaza in 50 years, but at least you live in reality. Do you believe these dipshits? You realize he looked in the camera on Tucker Carlson and on the Tucker Carlson show and totally made up and fabricated a story that he had evidence about Podesta's email being hacked by the Russians. He just made it up. But he said something else in that other Maddow clip. He said that Tulsi's not only not qualified because she was on the intel committee. By the way, didn't he get what happened with him on the intel committee? Wasn't there an article I had in the show about that at Axios or something? And McCarthy? Oh, he got kicked off the into. That's Justin. You're messing up my whole show. So weird. He didn't kick the breaking. Yeah, breaking as of 2023. So he says Tulsi is not qualified because he wasn't on the intel committee. And she keeps talking about this conspiracy theory about Rabio labs in Ukraine. Really? Conspiracy theory? You mean this one where Obama, Biden, Clinton Easter? Victoria Newland was up on Capitol Hill under oath talking about bio labs in Ukraine. No, I thought it was a conspiracy theory or something. Maybe you should ask Victoria Nuland. Check this out. Does Ukraine have chemical or biological weapons?
Justin
Ukraine has biological research facilities, which in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of. So we are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.
Dan Bongino
Come on, guys. In the chat, get it together. Adam Schiff said that's a conspiracy theory. It's so weird. And she under oath, they swear in, don't they? That's Obama, Clinton, Easter, Biden official Victoria Nuland talking about the weapons in Ukraine. Ukraine. But yes, Tulsi is definitely not qualified for talking about weapons, bio labs, whatever, in Ukraine. That kicked off the. How the hell do you get kicked off the Intel Committee? Well, we know why. Swalwell. Swalwell was sharing hard data with Fang Fang and it was hard. Yeah, it was hard. That. What do you mean? What's the. It's a lot of data terror Tera. Gigabytes of data. But Schiff got kicked off. I wonder why that is. You know how rare that is to kick people off comedy? You know how much you have to suck? There was a one through a thousand suck meter. You're seriously like 998. Like, you're like right at the top, folks. They live in a post truth world. I mean, what I'm saying. Like, I mean that in the actual literal sense. Like, nothing they say is in any way attached to the truth. But the far left, communist left embraces this. They enjoy it. It's like the strangest thing. It's like the Truman show, but you know that Jim Carrey movie where everybody's acting around them, but like, it's like the Truman show where Truman knows it's an act and they keep doing it. Here's another one. Miranda Devine, she has the book Laptop from Hell. Our publishing company Disclosure published the book, but Miranda Devine was stunned by this the other day. The New York Times, even for them, this is incredible. She said the New York Times put the other tweet first. Actually, when I quote the one I quote to you, quote, tweeted, do you have that? Then there was another tweet that I. She had basically. Here. Yes, here. Yeah. Miranda Devine, the New York Times writes this story and says, incredibly, which even for the New York Times, this has to be like at the basement of stupidity. They say that without evidence, that the New York Times is still in denial about the Laptop from hell, that there's basically no evidence there was political influence to say this laptop was Russian. So Miranda Devine is like, really without evidence. Like, here's actual evidence. Like, this is what. They live in a post truth world. Here's Mike Morell, the former CIA acting director to John Brennan, Obama's CIA director, ask him to sign the letter claiming Hunter Biden's laptop information was Russian in order to, quote, give the Biden campaign a talking point to push back on Trump. You can read the email, bro. Why does nobody trust the New York Times? Why are we the media now? Because this isn't hard folks, look at the article. German Lopez and Lina Bentahar. Aren't you embarrassed? Aren't you a little bit embarrassed? I mean, seriously, do your parents tell people they have no kids? I mean, you wrote this. She also claimed without evidence, talking about Tulsi Gabbard, that the Intelligence Committee undermined reports about what? Did you read the email, folks? The Democrats will defend the media, every act of corruption, every lie. The post truth world they live in, the Truman show act because the entire ideology is based on a lie. The rich don't pay their fair share, conservatives are Nazi racist, voting laws are Jim Crow, school choice is anti American and wastes money. Nothing they tell you is true. Tax cuts cost the government revenue. Some imbecile on Twitter this morning got in it with one of my followers, Dan Bongino. Is no evidence tax cuts have increased government revenue. I've never said they're causal. I do have evidence that's true. It's called evidence from the U.S. treasury. You could look it up, but you're too stupid to do that. The Democrats defend corruption, are defending the government waste the Doge is exposing because the Democrats don't care about where the money goes. Yes, they obviously profit from it. Putting that part aside, point stipulated. I mean, again, I wrote Follow the money to show you how Democrats profit from government. But you would. I want you to follow me. This is a really important point and it got lost a little bit in the show. I sensed when I tweeted something out, some people got a little confused, used. The Democrats do profit from government corruption through their NGOs and sometimes directly. And this kind of informal money laundering system they have give it NGOs pay Democrat lawmakers donate. But even then, if you were profiting, imagine it's your business. You don't want fraud in your own business. Right. Because it's less money for you. Correct. The point I was trying to get at yesterday is you would think even Democrats that profit from big government would be interested in weeding out fraud. Is this my. Is this point making sense, Justin? Because it's more money for them. So people are asking me, well, why don't they care about the fraud? Because folks, all they care about is control of the money. The government has to control your money no matter what. And they know they can't do it because the government can't even paint the color by numbers book. So they understand that if the fraud starts getting pointed out, it's over. Can you go to the LexisNexis guy first before Mike Lee I want to get to that, but I want you to show you what I mean. Here. This LexisNexis CEO is up on Capitol Hill yesterday and shocked the entire world. They asked him, how much fraud do you think is in government payments? Dead people, double payments, companies that don't exist. Folks, the number he gives is staggering. The Democrats don't want you to see this because then you're gonna say, why am I letting government control money? They can't figure this thing out. That's why. Watch this. How much money do you calculate is wasted due to waste, fraud and abuse in the entitlement programs each year? My number right now between federal, state.
Justin
And local government is you can save $1 trillion a year by simply putting in front end identity verification, eliminating self certification and monitoring the back end of the programs that are providing the benefits.
Dan Bongino
Those three things. Did he just say $1 trillion? Our entire tax base is about 4 trillion. We spend about 6, 7 trillion. You're telling me our taxpayer, 5 billion trillion, excuse me, is how big the numbers are. You're telling me about 20% of the government are totally, completely fraudulent payments? They will defend this because the minute you start to see how bad the problem is, you're going to fire the bookkeeper, which is the government, and they don't want that. So they'd rather get paid a little less and keep the corrupt bookkeeper, then get paid a little more and expose you. The bookkeeper is corrupt. Does that make sense? I want to get to this too because this is just again, just stunning how the Democrats have just married themselves to this post, post truth world of lies and corruption and they think nobody's going to see through it. Senator Mike Lee, great senator, one of the best, maybe the best. Senator Mike Lee's up on Capitol Hill, not an overly emotional guy. And Senator Lee yesterday was talking about, hey, Cash Patel gets in there, we're going to damn well need some accountability at the FBI too. We got the Moms for Liberty, the targeting of MAGA people, I mean the January six stuff, everything that went on in the FBI is become a real problem and put a bruise on the FBI's eyeballs, right? It's time to clean this place up. So Mike Lee is talking here specifically about getting rid of evidence where they can, getting rid of agents where they can find they acted either corruptly or outside of their duties or responsibilities. He's not talking about political retribution at all. Listen to what he says and watch the crazy response from Senator Mark Warner from Virginia because they don't want you looking into corruption no matter what. So they try to distract you with shiny red object stuff. Watch this.
D
Say that people in those agencies. And again, it's not all of them, but it's certainly some of them. And there will be an effort to figure out who was a bad actor and who was not to say that we're going to protect all of them and protect any of them from being fired, even if they did engaged in some of these dastardly acts. This is offensive. And our constituents, those who elected us, would be really upset with us with darn good reason if we supported this. I urge my colleagues to support. To oppose it.
Dan Bongino
Mr. Chairman. I'd simply say, as a member who was here on January 6th when the Capitol Police and FBI defended virtually all of us, to somehow say that protecting them would be an insult I find remarkable.
D
Mr. Chairman, that is not at all what I said. And I want to be very clear for the purposes of the record, that in no way, shape or form is that what I said. Make no reference to any of the people who are protecting us. I'm talking about those people. They know who they are. The Trump administration at some point will figure out who they are. I'm talking about those people who engaged in politically weaponized, indefensible acts. We should not immunize them. Not on my watch. Not on our watch. I oppose it.
Dan Bongino
Amen, brother. Mike, you see how Mark Warner, who's not a stupid guy, Democrat, hack senator from Virginia, has to distract you from the argument in their Truman show post truth world. Mike Lee is talking about evidence of hardcore corruption within the FBI. And what does he talk about? Well, the people who protect us. That's not at all what he said at all. Contrast that with spreadsheets. Trump. They did something wrong. Why they still work here. Got to go. See you. But people are going to say you're throwing Grandma off a cliff. I really don't care. We live in a truth, realpolitik world, folks. I told you to. I'm going to end today as I started. This is important. Don't panic over the legal warfare. I wish we didn't have a politicized justice system and judicial court system. Trump's cleaning it up. It's going to take a long time. We're going to have to appoint a lot of constitutionalist judges, but it's not going to get fixed overnight. But we're not going to lose them all. Matter of fact, Trump is acting very surgically, testing the parameters of power to see what the left will sue about. Or not. And sometimes just going right down the middle of the field. This happened yesterday during the show. Another legal victory is Emily Compagno from Outnumbered. Check this out.
Pam Bondi
So clarifying that the government can limit access to federal funds on the basis of the applicable authorizing statutes, regulations and terms. Essentially, yes, the government can do so in complying with regulations. And then that the previous order does not bar both the president and much of the federal government from exercising their own lawful authorities to withhold funding without the prior approval of the district court. Meaning again, they can disperse the monies that they were allocated within the law, within the confines of the law. And that the government does not have to seek preclearance from the courts on terminating funding as long as they have the authority to do it.
Dan Bongino
We are never, not this Bongino army and not this MAGA army. We are never going to hyperventilate like the media. The left sues. We're not going to sit here and melt down and freak out. We're not going to do any of that. I told you what was going to happen. We were going to win a lot of them. And this is just two. Turns out we can start to limit the spending of federal funds. Oh, look, now he's got the courts behind them too. Yes, you can fire some workers. We're not going to win them all. It's not the way it works in a republic. But we're going to win a lot and a lot when we're talking about this amount of fraud is big change. Thank you to competition in the chat. He says this hour goes by too fast. Thank you Dan. For truth and receipts. No, don't thank me guys and ladies for anything. I mean it. I appreciate it. But this isn't a real job. There's no thanks. I owe you everything. You owe me nothing. Not a thank you, nothing. I owe you a good show. It's a one way street. I appreciate the kind words, tips in the chat. It's all very nice. But you don't have to do any of that. Shows about you hear it every day to give you the hard truth. And we always bring the receipts. That's why you on this show are a week, two weeks, a day, 24 hours ahead of the news cycle every single time. Hey, thanks again for tuning in. Don't miss the radio show. It's here on Rumble if you want to watch. Starts at noon. Also you can listen to this show later on Demand on Apple podcasts and Spotify. And please subscribe on rumble. We hit 3.5 million subs. We really appreciate it. It's free. Absolutely free. Rumble.com Bongino or download the Rumble app. See you back here tomorrow on the radio show in a little bit. See you then. You just heard the Dan Bongino Show.
Summary of "Communist Libs Are Causing A 'Constitutional Crisis'" (Ep. 2422) – The Dan Bongino Show
Release Date: February 13, 2025
Introduction
In Episode 2422 of The Dan Bongino Show, host Dan Bongino delves into the escalating tensions within the American political landscape, emphasizing the alleged weaponization of government by liberal factions. The episode features insights from former Attorney General Pam Bondi and addresses issues ranging from constitutional challenges to media bias and foreign policy strategies.
Key Points:
Pam Bondi’s Allegations: Former Attorney General Pam Bondi discusses charges filed against New York officials, accusing them of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens.
Dan Bongino’s Analysis: Bongino interprets these legal actions as symptomatic of a broader strategy by Democrats to misuse governmental power against political opponents, particularly targeting figures like Donald Trump.
Asymmetric Warfare: Bongino characterizes the political and legal battles as asymmetric warfare, where the Democrats' aggressive lawsuits are a prolonged tactic meant to destabilize Republican figures.
Key Points:
Contrasting Narratives: Bongino criticizes mainstream media for what he perceives as biased reporting and highlights how his show claims to be "a week ahead of the news cycle."
Post-Truth Era: The discussion centers around the notion of living in a "post-truth world," where factual accuracy is undermined by widespread misinformation and media manipulation.
Media's Inflexibility: Bongino argues that traditional media outlets are incapable of adapting, leading to repetitive and unchanging narratives that fail to address current realities.
Key Points:
Defense Spending Critique: The show critiques current NATO commitments and European defense spending, advocating for increased defense allocations from member countries.
NATO's Commitment: Bongino highlights statements from figures like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, emphasizing the need for NATO allies to increase their defense budgets to alleviate the financial burden on the United States.
European Union Security: The episode references an op-ed by Anders Fogh Rasmussen, criticizing the U.S.'s role in NATO and suggesting that Europe should take greater responsibility for its own defense.
Key Points:
Audience Interaction: Bongino frequently engages with his audience, acknowledging tips and encouraging participation in the "Bongino army," fostering a sense of community among listeners.
Humorous Segments: The host incorporates humor and pop culture references to maintain listener interest and lighten the discussion, mentioning characters like Kylo Ren and proposing celebrity guests.
Key Points:
Warnings of Crisis: The episode repeatedly references warnings from political figures about an impending constitutional crisis, questioning the validity and sources of these claims.
Legal Interpretations: Bongino presents legal interpretations that support the Trump administration's stance against what they perceive as unconstitutional actions by liberal judges and officials.
Key Points:
Government Fraud: Bongino discusses significant fraud and waste within government programs, citing statements from LexisNexis CEO about potential savings through improved verification processes.
Democratic Hypocrisy: The show accuses Democrats of ignoring or covering up corruption to maintain control over government funds, asserting that their actions benefit them financially.
Key Points:
Criticism of Tulsi Gabbard: Bongino critiques Congressman Adam Schiff's statements regarding Tulsi Gabbard's qualifications for a DNI position, labeling the claims as unfounded and politically motivated.
Accusations Against Schiff: The host accuses Schiff of fabricating stories and lacking credibility, particularly concerning Russian interference and biolab conspiracies in Ukraine.
Conclusion
In this episode, Dan Bongino maintains a critical stance towards Democratic strategies, media narratives, and current governmental policies. By highlighting alleged corruption, advocating for increased defense spending among NATO allies, and questioning media integrity, Bongino aims to rally his audience against what he perceives as a systemic attempt to undermine Republican values and American constitutional principles.
Note: All quotes are directly attributed to the speakers with corresponding timestamps for reference.