Transcript
Vince (0:00)
Hello there. Welcome to the Tuesday edition of vince. Great to have you with us. This is a special edition of our show. And the reason for that is because I am spending today, this Tuesday, doing a bunch of interviews at the White House with a bunch of really important Trump administration officials. And I will bring you the fruits of those labors as the Vince show continues later this week. So tune in for all of that. That said, I decided what we'll do is we'll share a collection of some of the great radio conversations we're having this week with you on today's episode while I'm at the White House gathering all of these really important things. So I hope you enjoy today's special edition of vince. A lot of big live conversations coming up with you this week. Before we get into the content, I have to thank our sponsors. Are you a yo yo dieter? Do you diet? Do you lose weight and then you gain it all back plus a few extra pounds? You know this is dangerous. Studies show that it can actually increase your risk of heart attack, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and so many other health problems. Breaking free of your yo yo diet pattern is a main reason that doctors created Lean. Lean is a supplement. It's not an injection. You don't need a prescription. The science behind Lean is impressive. Its studied natural ingredients target weight loss in three powerful ways. Lean helps maintain healthy blood sugar. It helps control appetite and cravings. And it helps burn fat by converting that fat into energy. Listen, if you're tired of losing weight and then gaining it back, Lean was created just for you. I trust Lean so much, I've been giving it to my own family members who love it. And you will, too. Let me get you started with 20% off. Enter the code Vince20@takelean.com that's code Vince20akelean.com these statements and products have not been evaluated by the fda. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. And it's not a substitute or alternative to care from a health care provider. You know, Kamala Harris spent a lot of money on losing the presidential race last year. $1.5 billion to lose. What a tremendous and hilarious waste of money. But when she was spending all of that cash, she was dumping it meant much of it directly into the coffers of Democrat celebrities. Surprise, surprise. And the Washington Free Beacon has a brand new report on the subject which just tickles me to death that LeBron James had said that endorsing Kamala Harris was a, quote, personal decision for my kids. But the Free Beacon has discovered new disclosures show that Kamala Harris's campaign quietly paid LeBron's production company $50,000. After the post where LeBron declared, I'm endorsing her. I'm doing it for my kids. No, he was doing it for $50,000 is why he did it. That he took from the Kamala Harris campaign. And that was just one check. The Free Beacon explains. They also dug through all of the finances of the Kamala campaign and they found that Kamala gave $1 million to Oprah's company in exchange for that. Remember how that ridiculous sit down interview that they did where. Where Oprah sits in the middle and then says, you're so great. And then she would throw to like different people in the crowd and they would go, you're so great. And they all just did that for I don't know how long. It's like an hour of just miserable content. And that apparently cost $1 million to get that out of Oprah. Also $165,000 to Beyonce's team. They got Beyonce in for 165K. They got a. They got a four minute rally speech out of Beyonce. Do you remember the stunts that they had with Beyonce during the campaign? Oh, she's going to be at the dnc. Oh, she's going to perform. It's going to be the end of it. None of that happened. And then they finally get her on a stage in Texas where she goes out, she says hello to the crowd, and four minutes later she leaves. And then the crowd, which had expected a performance, they left to the crowd started heading for the exits because there was no Beyonce performance. Hilarious. Also, Kamala's campaign dumped $58,000 to Cardi B. Who at the time claimed that she wasn't paid at all. They also gave half a million dollars to MSNBC host Al Sharpton's nonprofit. That's the blackmail operation. You either pay Al Sharpton or he calls you a racist. So Kamala said, I'll pay half a million dollars. That was weeks before she appeared on msnbc. Oh, is that a conflict, anybody? Any problem there with an MSNBC host taking a half million dollars from a guest in order to appear on the network? Yeah, that's fine. Al Sharpton will not be held accountable for that or else he'll call MSNBC racist. 35,000 to Jennifer Garner for event production and Travel and another $100,000 to the Obamas and their shell company for campaign appearances. Obama, who refused to endorse Kamala Harris, remember at the outset instead wanted an open primary so that Democrats could battle it out because Barack Obama knew how, how terrible of a candidate she was. And so how did Kamala earn Brock's favor? Oh, by paying him and Michelle $100,000 for their campaign appearances. So excellent work again by the Washington Free Beacon as they dig in here on all of this money that flowed through the Kamala Harris campaign into the left. The left is a gigantic money laundering operation. Isn't it everything? And it's not just their own money. It's your money oftentimes. What do you think USAID is? USAID has been a gigantic money laundering operation, mostly for the left. Now, there have been Republicans who have gotten in on the action, but mostly this is for Democrats to launder taxpayer money to their pet projects and their friends and to get fancy dinners out of it, all at your expense, while introducing a lot more chaos to the planet. So that's what's actually been going on. So again, a great report from the Washington Free Beacon this week. Hey, I do want to bring up something that's going on today. Pete Hegseth. Pete Hegseth is now once again in the hot seat for the American press. A lot of scandals being kicked up around Pete Hegseth. And last night there was a Pentagon spokesman who ran a piece in Politico who just quit. He just quit his job. And he ran a piece in Politico and said that it's time for Pete Hegseth to be fired, to go. The spokesman for the Pentagon is doing this? Yeah, they say former top Pentagon spokesperson. He's a spokesman. Details month from hell inside the agency. Politico reports it's an op ed written by a guy called John Oyat. He's a former chief Pentagon spokesman. He led communications on the National Security Council and the Department of Veterans affairs back in President Trump's first term. He just resigned from the Pentagon and he starts his op ed this week with it's been a month of total chaos at the Pentagon from leaks of sensitive operational plans to mass firings. The dysfunction is now a major distraction for the president who deserves better from his senior leadership. This guy says President Trump has a strong record of holding his top officials to account. This is him sucking up the Trump in this op ed. Think about what he's doing. He just quit the Pentagon and then he's instantly crapping on the secretary of defense in public. And he's sucking up the Donald Trump in the second paragraph right away to justify his behavior and hopefully induce the firing of Pete. Hegseth that's what his goal is here, he said. Given this, it's hard to see Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth remaining in his role for much longer. The latest flashpoint is a near collapse inside the Pentagon's top ranks. On Friday, Hegseth fired three of his most loyal senior staffers, Senior advisor Dan Caldwell, Deputy Chief of Staff Darren Selnick, and Colin Carroll, chief of staff to the Deputy Secretary of Defense. In the aftermath, Defense Department officials working for Hexath tried to smear the aids anonymously to reporters, claiming they were fired for leaking sensitive information as a part of an investigation ordered earlier this month. This guy says, yet none of this is true. While the department said that it would conduct polygraph tests as a part of the probe, not one of the three has been given a lie detector test. In fact, at least one of them has told former colleagues that investigators advised him he was about to be cleared officially of any wrongdoing. Unfortunately, Hegseth team has developed a habit of spreading flat out easily debunked falsehoods anonymously about their colleagues on the way out the door. And then, he says. On Friday, Politico reported that he sets chief of staff, a guy called Joe Casper was also leaving his role. Casper had requested the investigation into the Pentagon leaks, which reportedly included military operational plans for the Panama Canal and a pause in the collection of intel for Ukraine. All right, so there's, there's a lot going on here, including a lot of things that are out of our sight right now. And so let me, let me do something. Let me just do a basic thing which is to urge caution as you are fed a bunch of different stories that may not be the truth. You're being fed a bunch of different stories that may themselves not be the truth about what's actually happening inside of the Pentagon right now. For instance, just to give you a perspective on one of the things that's going on in Washington right now, there's a meaningful battle about how militarily engaged the Trump administration should be with Iran. That's a real fight. That's, that's going on apparently inside of the Trump administration right now with people taking different sides of that issue. How aggressive should we be? Should we be ready for military strikes? Should we be striking nuclear facilities? Should we, to what extent should we engage in what they call kinetic action on Iran? Is it worth it to go to war with Iran? What will the second and third order effects of that be? Well, of course, those are all deeply reasonable questions that you should raise. And so as A result, as you know, that that debate is going on, it has to color your perception about the way that these stories are being told in public. Dan Caldwell, the senior advisor that just left the Pentagon, and apparently Darren Selnick and Colin Carroll, too, were both much more cautious about military engagement with Iran than other people in the administration are. Is that an animating factor for why they were just ejected? Was their position on trying to prevent a war with Iran the reason why they're being sidelined? Oftentimes, what you see in Washington, when you get stories like this, there's a lot of scandal around it. You're being told they're leaving for one reason. It's not entirely clear what's going on. There's infighting. Oftentimes the explanation for that is you have two ideologically warring sides that are jockeying for power, and people are being ejected. There are casualties as a result of those fights. Now, is it possible that these guys are leakers, that they've just been speaking out of school, that they've been leaking operational plans and that they've been giving up information that they shouldn't have in violation of the law and a violation of their obligations to the Pentagon? Yeah, it's possible. And that's the case. They should. They should face consequences for that action. But I am telling you right now that you should hold your breath before you jump to real conclusions about any of this and what all these guys are doing now. Pete Hegseth. Pete Hegseth did speak a little bit about this today at the White House Easter egg roll. He was there with his family and with some of the kids, and he was asked about this by a reporter earlier. Listen to Hegseth's response here.
