Transcript
A (0:00)
Everybody, welcome to events on a Thursday. Great to have you with us. Big show ahead. Another Democrat congresswoman just got indicted, you know, because of crimes she apparently committed. We'll get into the details there. The left is continuing to spin up the most ludicrous defenses about why they are in bed and have been with Jeffrey Epstein. And, well, the attacks on the president's pursuit of justice and his Justice Department, those continue as well. I actually, I've got such a massive list of things that we could get to today. I hope we can get to all of them. It's all ahead on this edition of Vince. It is great to have you with us. The best audience anywhere. You guys are the best. Let's see, we got to thank our great sponsors today. We've got One Skin. Hey, if you're like me at all and if you're like, like, like basically everyone, your skin needs a little bit of extra care this time of year. Between the colder weather and the holiday stress, it's, it can feel like nonstop pressure on your system. And really we've got one Skin in our household. And my wife, my, my wonderful wife Allison has been using it and she loves this stuff and she has noticed an instant difference for her. It's created real, real, real difference for her. She's enjoyed it a lot. She's been using the OS 01 Face Moisturizer, Total Game changer. And at the core is something called the OSO1 peptide. It's the first ingredient proven to target senescent cells. It's a cool word. It's the root cause of wrinkles, crepiness, the loss of elasticity, all key signs of skin aging. And these results have now been validated in five different clinical studies. And just in time for the holidays, One Skin has also launched their limited edition holiday sets, including the nightly rewind gift set featuring their bestselling face moisturizer, their new peptide lip mask, and a cooling gua sha tool. Yeah, that's right, a gua shot tool. Each component of the set is designed to work together as your body enters its natural nightly repair mode, helping renew skin at the cellular level for a stronger, smoother and more resilient skin. It's your skin. Take care of it. For a limited time, try one skin for 15 off using code vince@oneskin.com Vince after you purchase, they'll ask you where you heard about them. So please support our show. Tell them that we sent you. Yeah, we've got, we've got some wild stuff going on. We've got another Democrat who's just been indicted, which is f fantastic news. Add it to the list. Add it to the list. Democrat Congresswoman Sheila Cheerfulis McCormick is a Democrat from Florida. And for those of you watching on the video podcast, here is her mug. That's what she looks like. She's smiling, she's having a great time as she poses for a little photo. And now she's got an indictment from the United States Department of Justice. What's her indictment for? She stole a crap ton of money, the feds say. $5 million in FEMA funding. 5 million bucks stolen by a Democrat congresswoman. Well, how did she pull it off? What exactly happened here? Well, it turns out, as you might imagine, it's Covid related and it's FEMA related. This is disaster funds that she's alleged to have stolen. Here's what Bill Malusion says over at the Fox News Channel. Breaking the Department of Justice has charged Congresswoman Sheila Cherfoulis McCormick, Democrat from Florida, was stealing $5 million in FEMA funds. FEMA, that would be emergency funds, disaster funding. She laundered the proceeds and then used the money to support her 2021 congressional campaign. She faces up to 53 years in prison if convicted, according to the indictment that the Department of Justice has brought under the great President Donald Trump. Cheerfulis McCormick, 46 years old, and her brother Edwin Cherfoulis. What a name. 51, both of Miramar, worked through their family healthcare company on a FEMA funded COVID 19 vaccination staffing contract in 2021. Every single one of those buzzwords drives me absolutely crazy. Covid, the vax, the jab, FEMA, they're stealing from us. In July of 2021, the company received an overpayment of $5 million in FEMA funds. Disaster funding. The indictment alleges the defendants conspired to steal that money and then routed it through multiple accounts to disguise its source. Prosecutors alleged a substantial portion of the misappropriated funds were used as a candidate contribution. So basically she funded her campaign with it in 2021 and for their personal benefit of the defendants. The indictment goes on and says that Atrophyless McCormick and another person called Nadeji LeBlanc, 46 of Miramar arranged a bunch of additional contributions using straw donors. This is basically the straw donors are when you take ill gotten money, give it to somebody else and then have them give it back to you as if it's a political donation that they made on an independent basis. That's what's happening here. So they're funneling all of this taxpayer funding that they've gotten, $5 million stolen, directly into our political campaign. The indictment charges Tris McCormick and her 2021 tax preparer, David Spencer, 41 years old, with conspiring to file false tax returns. And according to this indictment, they falsely claim political spending and other personal expenses as business deductions. Yada, yada, yada. We're looking at a lot of time in jail for this lady. 53 years in prison. 53 years in prison. She is suspiciously quiet right now in the wake of the fact that she's just been slapped with these charges. So, ladies and gentlemen, add her to the list. That because she becomes the latest Democrat lawmaker to receive charges of this, of this kind, of any kind of, uh, indictments have been dropping like crazy on these Democrats. Everybody, from the James Comeys to the Letitia James's to the Monica Lamonica McIver to the Catabuga Zaylas, uh, and now the Sheila Cheris McCormick. Oh, and of who, who could of course forget John Bolton, who I think officially is a Democrat these days, I'm pretty sure. Uh, so a lot of Democrats here probably being prosecuted, which means the nothing ever happens crowd can take a heaping helping of shut up. I'm just kidding. I'm not going to say it, but shut up. Stop you whining. Yeah, no, the Trump administration's serious about this stuff. They're really going after these people for real. You know, it wasn't that long ago. Normally they've known about this for years. To be clear, that was 20, 21 when that happened. The Biden administration could have done this. The DOJ and Demerit Garland could have done this. They didn't. They just let it go. And this Trump administration not letting it go, they're charging these people. So good for them. They got the evidence bringing the charges and now she's got to deal with it in court. And so 53 years in prison if convicted. A round of applause for the Trump administration. Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you to Pam Bondi and the team. Keep going after these guys. You know, they are fighting it out right now in Virginia. James Comey is currently locking horns in the Eastern District of Virginia trying to get out of this, get out of this court process. He's been charged with lying to Congress because what was it again? Oh, he lied to Congress. He lied to Congress. So he's fighting it out in court. He's trying to get the whole thing dismissed right now. It's so unfair. And this malicious prosecution, it wasn't handled the right way. Lindsey Halligan, the smoke show US Attorney who's handling the case right now, it seems like she really has actually crossed all of her T's and dotted all of her I's. Yet the left is whipping everybody into a frenzy. I don't know if you saw any of these headlines yesterday, but they were acting as if Lindsey Halligan is just some sort of, you know, rookie, naive prosecutor, has no idea what she's doing. She's screwing everything up here. And here's how the New York Times presented it yesterday. And this is. This is the way they're framing it. You ready? New York Times says Trump loyalist, Trump loyalist admits grand jury never saw final Comey indictment. Never saw the final Comey indictment. What are they. What in the world are they talking about here? Never saw the indictment. Is that true? I'll tell you right up front, the New York Times is lying to you. Lying to you. James Meyer says telling folks to shut the fuck up is not a good idea. Well, if they deserve to shut the fuck up, I'll tell them to shut the fuck up. James. So thank you for your contribution to our program. A. A federal judge has grilled the prosecutors pursuing charges against James Comey, the former FBI director, on Wednesday interrogating them with a series of questions that underscored irregularities in the case, including that the full grand jury did not see the indictment it was supposed to have approved. All right, so the Times frame up is, oh, that Lindsey Halligan kept this from the grand jury. They had no idea what they were even signing on to. The questioning by the judge, Michael S. Nakmanoff, took place at an excruciatingly awkward hearing in federal district Court in Alexandria, Virginia, that was nominally held to consider the narrow issue of whether the charges against Mr. Comey have been filed as an act of vindictive retribution by President Trump. But Judge Nakmanoff peppered prosecutors with questions on a range of topics, including Trump's own statements about wanting Comey to be indicted. All right, so basically, the Times is framing this in the worst possible light, spinning this in the direction of the left. And. And the judge in this case is being a full blown Trump derangement syndrome lunatic. And here's what's going on. 1. Is President Trump allowed to complain about the treatment that this country has gotten from James Comey? You bet he's definitely allowed to do that. Is Donald Trump in charge of the United States Department of Justice? Unquestionably so. He's the Commander in Chief. There's this weird game that the left plays where it's like, no, the Justice Department is independent of the President. No, actually, what you're describing is unconstitutional. The United States Department of Justice falls in the executive branch, works for the President of the United States, and at his direction. If President Trump calls Pam Bondi right now and says, hey, I want you to drop everything and concentrate on the cartels, I want you to go after every drug dealer in America. I want you to get all this fentanyl off the street. She doesn't. It's not like she's got options here. She goes, aye, aye, sir, or she leaves and somebody else comes in who's actually going to follow orders. This is the United States Constitution. This is Article two. This is very simply how it works. The President's in charge and acting like that's a scandal. Preposterous. And now the next part here, and this is the one that the left is going absolutely crazy over today. They're acting like Lindsey Halligan kept information from the grand jury. Let me remind you about what was presented. There were three counts presented to the grand jury in the James Comey case. 3. The grand jury signed off on 2. They said, two of these are good enough for an indictment. The third one, we don't think so. We can't agree on that. So they dropped that one. So that's why Comey ended up with two charges and not three. By the way, that's evidence that the grand jury was not a rigged process. The way the left handles things, like in Washington, D.C. the grand jury deliberated. They actually made distinctions between charges that they thought were legitimate. And they said, two of these are good to go, and they pushed them forward. So there's a very simple thing that took place here that the left is trying to turn into a scandal. And we turn to our buddy Mike Davis at the Article 3 project, the Viceroy. Mike Davis, who is describing this this way. U.S. attorney Lindsey Halligan corrects the record and slams the magistrate's reckless attempt to derail the Comey prosecution. The U.S. attorney's declaration confirms the events that occurred following the grand jury proceeding. This is how it went the court. And he goes. The court reporter's contemporaneous email confirms it, too. And the grand jury, four persons open court statements confirm it, too. And the transcript confirms it, too. The confusion here, and Mike's almost being generous to the judge. The confusion here arrives solely from the judge's misinterpretation of the administrative correction, removing count one. From the indictment after the grand jury returned a true bill on counts two and three. That adjustment simply reflected the grand jury's vote. It was neither unusual nor improper. All right, let me, let me drill that down even further on what this means. Basically, grand jury looks at all three counts. They look at all three counts, they go yes on two of them, no on one of them. And so Lindsey Halligan, having the sign off already on the language from the grand jury, takes counts two and three where they said yes, she just cuts out, cut one from the count, one from the document, brings it back to the jury, four person and says, okay, please sign off on the new one. They sign off on it. There's no deceit here. Nothing hidden from the grand jury, no stunts or anything. Lindsay Halligan did her job. The grand jury was fully informed. They were fully bought in on the charges. And any attempt to throw out the Comey case on this basis is absolutely, disgracefully corrupt. The judge is out of hand right now. The judge is completely wrong right now. And as you see headlines on this subject, acting like Lindsey Halligan is some sort of disaster. Who? Oh, she just bungled all of this. She really screwed it up. We could have had Comey dead, the rights if it wasn't for Lindsey Halligan. No, once again, it's the system protecting its own. It's corrupt officials attempting to look for any weaselly way to try and get James Comey out of the well deserved scrutiny that he's currently facing. And a reminder for you about James Comey and what's coming up next. Comey obviously is dealing with this Eastern District of Virginia case. He's desperate to get rid of it as we speak and God willing, we can keep it alive. Despite the many efforts by the left to throw it out. In the end, it may still be thrown out. I'm not promising anything's going to work to finally get to a conviction with Comey here. I have reminded you that, yes, the process is the punishment. It is meaningful that we've gotten to this step. This is a step that James Comey never thought he'd see. An actual indictment, an actual prosecution fighting it out in court. Never thought that would happen. So good. Make him miserable for as long as possible. But what also we're looking forward to is what we believe to be grand conspiracy charges coming in Florida in January. So the discovery in this process, all the stuff that's coming out in court right now about James Comey and his nefarious activities, all of his communications behind the scenes, the lies that he's telling about his communications. Each of those things would be meaningful contributions to a grand conspiracy trial. In other words, overt acts in furtherance of a conspiracy. So, yeah, let's keep on going with this. Is it going to be a fight? You're damn right it is. It's going to be a fight. But I'm glad it's a fight that's finally taking place. It's long overdue and we get a big battle in court today. So a little bit of explanation for, for what is happening in the Comey case. The left was getting very exercised about this. They thought, they thought, oh, finally we're getting. Call me out of it. No, this is a thing. This is a good thing. Let's see. Leon, Liana hall, is it? Leon, Leanna, thank you. Liana says, Vince, we want perp walks, not mere discomfort. Yeah, I'm with you. Although a perp walk, what you're talking about is like you play somebody in handcuffs and you drag them past the cameras and you put them through the deep sense of shame which they so richly deserve. I totally get that. I want everything, I want more than perp walks. I'm. Let me one up you. I want a full blown sentence for these people. I want to go all the way to the end of this thing. But again, I'm going to take every last element that I can possibly get here. We need accountability. We need accountability. No question about it. The first step of that is an indictment. If somebody comes at you, there's a, there's a, there's a, an instinct, I think, by some people who become so black pilled that they see an indictment and they're like, I'm tired of sternly worded letters or whatever. What is it doesn't mean anything. You're moving the goalposts in your own, in your own mind. If that's the case, you think an indictment is nothing? Try being indicted and then, and then get back to me on how that feels. How many January 6th defendants had to go through that horseshit? How many Trump people had to go through that? Think about it. Indictment's a massive, massive thing. I know I don't really have to remind most of this audience. I think everybody kind of gets it. But there's a, there's a. Sometimes it feels like an op. Like it's like straight up, like a disinformation operation. People are like, it's not enough. A conviction, not enough. It's like, it's like you're really just trying to cause division on the Right. We've been demanding accountability. We finally have a president who's delivering it. I'm going to root that on and then I'm going to tell you about every step of the process as it happens. So, yeah, no, it's a, this is, this is very important. These prosecutions are very important. These are not a bunch of no names. These are like the biggest fish you can possibly imagine. I'll take all of it. I will have some perspective, you know what I mean? All right, so that's what's happening with Comey. We've got updates on the Jeffrey Epstein saga. President Trump has just signed the Epstein disclosure bill into law. He has a message for the country about this. And also Democrats are continuing the most ludicrous spin we've ever heard them wield. And we've heard them wield a lot of ludicrous spin. More ahead on this edition of vince, you know, freedom has never been free. And lately we've been reminded, unfortunately, just how high that cost can be. Growing violence is meant to shake us, but it really should only strengthen our resolve never to back down. And that's why Patriot Mobile exists. For over 12 years, they've been defending faith, family and freedom while providing the same or better premium network access on all three major U.S. networks. Unlimited data, mobile hotspots, international roaming, they do it all. So when you switch, you don't sacrifice quality or service. Hundreds of thousands of people have joined the movement by switching their cell service to Patriot Mobile. Now every time that they pay their bill, well, they're supporting a company that actually believes in the first Amendment, the second Amendment, the sanctity of life and our veterans and our first responders switching so easy. Keep your number, keep your phone or even upgrade. Their 100% US based customer support team can activate you in just minutes on the phone. I love Patriot Mobile. You're going to love patriot mobile. Call 972-patriot or visit patreon mobile.com vince today. Use the promo code vince for a free month of service. That's patriot mobile.com vince or call 972-patriot make that switch today. Thanks to Patriot Mobile for being a great sponsor of this program. The Epstein Law has come into place. It's been signed, which means it's a law. Now for those of you who know the Schoolhouse Rock order of events, President Trump announcing on Truth Social in yet another exhaustive Truth Social post that he signed this thing, he says the following. We love our president, don't we, folks? Here we go. Jeffrey Epstein, who was charged by the Trump justice department in 2019, not by the Democrats, was a lifelong Democrat. He donated thousands of dollars to Democrat politicians and was deeply associated with many well known Democrat figures such as you ready for the list? You know these people. Bill Clinton, who was on the plane 26 times. Larry Summers, who just resigned from a bunch of boards, including Harvard sleazebag political activist Reid Hoffman. You know, if I'm Donald Trump, I hate Reid Hoffman. Hate that guy, hate him. Why does he hate Reid Hoffman? Reid Hoffman funds all of the left wing chaos. He's the guy who dumped all that money into the E. Gene Carroll suit against Donald Trump. That's Reid Hoffman. He funded all of these crazy attacks on Trump. So, and then remember, Elon Musk actually said during the political campaign, he said, you know, Reid Hoffman probably has a lot to worry about about the Epstein files. If anybody does, He's, I think Reid Hoffman does. And you know Epstein, he runs around with all these rich people. He might know a thing or two. So he said, keep an eye on Reid Hoffman. All right, we'll keep an eye on him. Donald Trump saying, hey, I'm signing this thing in the law. We're about to make a bunch of this public. Let's see who else. Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the President refers to, who asked Epstein to donate to his campaign after Epstein was charged. Democrat Congresswoman Stacy Plaskett, you know, the lady who was texting with the registered sex offender, the child rapist, getting question ideas from him during a 2019 congressional hearing and many more. Perhaps the truth about these Democrats and their associations with Epstein will soon be revealed because guess what? I just signed the bill to release the Epstein files. As everyone knows, I asked the speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader pass the bill because of my request. The votes were unanimous. I love, I love this so much. You know what's funny about this? Obviously Democrats thought that they had like some big scheme going, oh, we're going to imply Trump is guilty of something. We're going to impose a scandal on him by focusing on Epstein. So President Trump comes in this week and he goes, actually, I want Republicans to vote for it. So now the votes are unanimous because Democrats, they haven't, they haven't gotten a software update yet. So they all voted for it. And then the President takes credit for the, for the almost unanimous vote in favor of passage. I love that. That's got to tick them off. Which makes me even happier. At my direction, the Department of Justice has already turned over close to 50,000 pages of documents to Congress. Don't forget, the Biden administration didn't turn over anything, nothing about Epstein, nor did they ever speak about him. Democrats have used this Epstein issue, which affects them a lot more than any Republican, in order to try and distract from our amazing victories, he says. And what are the victories? What does he like? I like these things, too. Ready? The big, beautiful tax cut bill. Strong borders. Strong. You want to talk about strong? How about airtight? No men and women's sports. No transgender for everyone. Getting rid of dei. Stopping Biden's inflation, lowering prices. The biggest tax and regulation cuts in history. Ending eight wars, pretty good. Rebuilding the military, which the Democrats, by the way, are trying to divide right now. Knocking out Iran's nuclear capability with some bunker buster bombs. Getting trillions of dollars brought into the United States, including this week when he brought the, the Saudis in, bragging about trillions of dollars of new investment, creating the hottest country anywhere in the world and delivering a huge defeat to the Democrats on that recent shutdown disaster. And so the president, look, his message is, hey, let's make America great again. And this whole thing is all going to blow up in their faces. And all, all it's doing is blowing up in their faces. These Democrats are stepping on rakes every time they talk about Jeffrey Epstein. They want to do that. Go for it. Be our guest. Keep talking about it. In fact, this Epstein thing, they don't even know how to spin out of it. Now it's gotten so bad that CNN is now asking questions about these Democrats and the relationships with Jeffrey Epstein. That's how, you know, it's got, it's gotten bad. Even CNN saying this doesn't look very good. Actually, Jasmine Crockett, you know her, she's, she's not that smart. She, she barely has two brain cells to rub together. She was on CNN last night and she was being asked by the host Kaitlan Collins, to account for the fact that she invented a very nasty defamatory accusation about a bunch of Republicans, including Lee Zeldin. She alleged that these Republicans had taken money from Jeffrey Epstein. What she didn't disclose during her ridiculous congressional speaking was that the Jeffrey Epstein that gave money to Lee Zeldin is In fact a Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, a neurosurgeon who did not die in a jail cell and has nothing to do with the child sex offender that we know of as Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah, they're not even the same person. So CNN asks Jasmine Crockett why she lied about this. Take a look.