Karen Bass (24:57)

A week ago, everything was peaceful in the city of Los Angeles and in all of the representatives behind me in their cities as well. Things began to be difficult on Friday when raids took place. And it's important that I begin there because that is the cause of the problems that. That have happened in the city of Los Angeles and other cities. This was a provocative. This was provoked by the White House. The reason why we don't know.

Vince (25:31)

Karen Bass is out of control. She's completely out of control. So she blames Trump for all of this. It's Trump's fault. It's Trump's fault. None of this would have happened if law enforcement didn't do their jobs. Do you hear her that. The raids on Friday. And again, to remind you, Tom Holman has been explicit about this. Why were they raiding on Friday? Why were they raiding? The answer to that is because they were going after cartel activity. They were serving criminal warrants in Los Angeles on Friday. They made 100 arrests as a result of all of that. And Karen Bass is angry that they were enforcing the law. So she said, it's Trump's fault. It's Trump's fault. They began the raids, and so they deserve the violence. What kind of demented public official roots on the people who are destroying your community just because cops are doing their jobs? Oh, that's right. Karen Bass and the Democrats who run California. That's what they do. That's what they do. And she's not alone here. Before we barrel forward, I should make sure that all of our tech issues are resolved. Cause we do have a guest coming up. Let's start with Justin. Can you. Can you talk to me? Can I hear from you, brother? There you are. Okay, I hear you now. Okay, good. Let's. Okay. That's a relief. Were you sweating it? Justin? Justin. Okay, all right. Justin tells me. I was on the whole time, and he was freaking out. Okay, good. All right, good. You were freaking out. I was freaking out. We were all freaking out. Everybody was freaking out. I've got one more for you before we thank our next sponsor. And we get to our great guest. I do have the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, who is he is. Is this really still true? He has a 6% approval rating. How do you have a 6% approval rating? And you're the mayor of a Major American city. How did you even get elected in the first place? Is this not at least suggestive evidence that Chicago's elections are explicitly rigged? How do you have a 6% approval rating? Brandon Johnson does. Here's Brandon Johnson, cut 7, talking about ICE doing its job. And he says, yeah, that's basically the Confederacy. That's who ICE is. They're the Confederacy.

Justin (27:52)

They are absolutely terrified. And that's. Look, I remember a few stand ups ago when I talked about what terrorism looks like. This is it. There should be no question to what our country will look like had the Confederacy won. We're seeing it on full display.

Vince (28:10)

It's just, it's mind bogglingly stupid. Everything about that analysis is just mind bogglingly stupid. This is terrorism. No, I would say if you want to classify something as terrorism, I would say illegal aliens killing American citizens and then waving flags for foreign countries. That's terrorism. That's what terrorism is. Illegal aliens raping women and girls here in the United States. That's terror. We don't want that in our country. Illegal aliens invading our country and staying here in violation of every single law you could possibly imagine. That shouldn't be happening. And for people to say that the law needs to be upheld and they need to be objected and then be called terrorists for doing that, you're disgusting. And there's no. It's no wonder you have a 6% approval rating. So those are the mayors of once great American cities who are doing their best to absolutely drive those things into the ground because they're serving their masters. You know who they're serving? They're serving the radical left. They're serving the radical left in California. Gavin Newsom. There's a great report on this. Jed McFatter is an excellent reporter. He works with Susan Crabtree. They just wrote that great book together, Fool's Gold about California. Jed McFatter has an amazing thread on X today. I shared it on my X account. You can find it there. About how Gavin Newsom has been backing the rioters, which all got started this past week because it was whipped into a frenzy by a group called Chirla. Chirla is the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights. La Chirla chirla has received $35 million from California taxpayers. Additionally, they've received at least half a million dollars from federal taxpayers. They have turned around and they've incited all of these riots. And Gavin Newsom has taken money from this group. Back during the 2021 recall, Gavin Newsom's defense efforts were being funded in part by Chirla. So this is all scheme. This is all. The left is working against you for a bunch of reasons. Some of them are explicitly. Actually, all of them are explicitly corrupt. The money that's flowing into Gavin Newsom, he's bought and paid for. And of course, Karen Bass is by extension, of course, you know, Brandon Johnson is as well. They're bought and paid for, these guys. The other piece is they're defensive of illegal immigration into the country. They cover it up because they know they stand to gain an electoral benefit out of it, meaning either the chaos hurts Trump, which is what they want, or. And. Or they get the strength of the Electoral College and the strength of unearned congressional seats just by counting the bodies that are in California, the illegal aliens. So everything about this is a corrupt incentive. And this is why the left is rooting against you. It's why they're rooting against peace, and it's why they're rooting for chaos. And it's got to stop. It's got to stop. A great report here from Jed McPhatter. Again, you can find that on my X account. Coming up, I've got the great Ned Ryan from American Majority. I want to talk about the state of our country right now because. And getting all of these illegals out and how important that is to restoring our sovereignty. We'll also talk about cutting spending. It actually is possible to do both. I know that Senator Rand Paul seemed to suggest to me yesterday, you only get one option. I don't feel like that at all. I feel like we have to do both. We do. We have to cut spending and we have to cut out the illegal aliens who are in our country. That's important. Hey. Sometimes turning off your brain long enough to actually get some sleep is the hardest thing you're going to do all day. I understand. I understand. Believe me, I understand. Bowl and branch sheets can help you tremendously with that. They help me. My wife and I love our bowl and branch sheets. They quiet all that noise wrapping you in a softness so extraordinary that your body and mind effortlessly drift off to sleep. Their signature sheets are made with the finest 100% organic cotton, so you can spend every single night in the softest feeling imaginable. We do love them. You know who else loves them? My dogs. My dogs. Major adores my bolin branch sheets. He climbs up there. You know what's great about Major? I mean, along with everything else, he waits to get up on the bed until I invite him. So he just rests his face right on the edge of the bowl and branch sheets until I say, okay, Major get up. And then he does. He gets up on the bed and he'll curl up. Find a good spot. Very comfortable. Ghee. Oh. Guy tells me his cat loves the bowl and branch sheets too. All creatures love boll and branch. These are the best selling sheets. They feel buttery. They're breathable. They get softer with every wash. Not that you'll need it, but you can try them if you just want to try them. I'll try them for an entire month. Bowl and branch. There's no catch. You can wash style. Feel the difference for yourself. Risk free. If you don't get your best night's sleep, you can send them back for a full refund. I love them. You will too. You can feel the difference. Get an extraordinary night's sleep with Boland branch. Get 15% off plus free shipping on your first set of sheets@bollandbranch.com Vince that's Bole N Branch B O L L a n d branch.com Vince and you'll save 15%. Exclusions apply. See site for details Boland Branch Major loves them. He really does. And you know what I love? And Major likes to bug me when I'm doing it. I love my Power Rack Pro from Jacked Up Fitness. More and more Americans are actually taking care of their wellness. They're getting back in shape. Studies prove that strength training does more to help burn fat than cardio alone. That's why I'm so pleased to be working with Don and the team at Jacked Up Fitness. Their all in one home gyms are already best in class. And their all new X series elevates home fitness to a whole new level. The Power Rack Pro X functional trainer lets you do hundreds of exercises. Everything that you used to do at the gym, you can do it now. All from the comfort of your own spare room, your garage, your basement, wherever you want to set it up. This absolutely stunning machine features a completely upgraded cable crossover system with articulating pulley arms, giving you unlimited width combinations to hit every single muscle group. And if you're new to strength training, they've got a free Get Jacked up program. It's got full body video workouts. You just press play and you follow along. So no more excuses. Get fit. You should do it. I'm doing it. Let's do it together. Go to getjacked up.com sign up for their free training program and when you're ready to purchase your own Power Rack Pro X. Use my promo code, Vince, and you'll save 10% at checkout. That's right. Jacked up fitness, baby. Love jacked up fitness. Really, really do. Swinging all over that thing every day. All right, let's. Let's bring in our great guest now, the head of American Majority, Ned Ryan joins us on the program. Ned, good to have you back with us, sir.

Justin (35:06)

Yeah, good to be with you, Vince.

Vince (35:09)

Always, always good to chat. All right, so let's start immigration invasion. Yeah, Rioting. What's going on right now? The left. I was just describing that the left has all of these perverse incentives to continue to encourage this destruction. And it just. Which means it's kind of up to the rest of us. It's up to the president to do something about it. It. Don't you think?

Justin (35:29)

100%. I think yesterday got me to a point of complete frustration over some of the, I would argue, propaganda that was being pushed out by, say, David Ignatius of the Washington Post. Democrats ignored border politics. Somebody else wrote that they blundered on the border. No, they didn't. They didn't ignore border politics. They were hoping we ignored it. They were hoping that the American people weren't paying attention to what they were actually doing in facilitating a systematic invasion of this country, especially over the last four years. And I say that very specifically, Vince, because go back to the first year of Biden's administration. In that first year alone, There were almost 300 executive actions by Biden that essentially annihilated border security, that lowered deportations, did a whole host of things to really lower the barrier of entry for illegal immigrants, illegal aliens. As they were doing that with, say, their left hand, the Biden administration decided that with their right hand, they would shovel billions of taxpayer dollars into these religious NGOs to incentivize them to actually do resettlement of migrants in this country. I mean, Catholic Charities USA in 2021 alone got 1.4 billion. There were other charities, when you combine them, that were getting multiple billions. And so they were lowering the barrier of entry. The Biden administration was as. They were incentivizing an increase in this illegal alien invasion. And you were talking about chaos in one of your previous segments here. And I just want to say that, again, none of this is a mistake. None of this is by chance. It was all systematic. We're seeing the full extent of it now in la. I think we're going to see it in other parts of the country as well. But I truly believe, Vince, obviously there are powers that be inside of the previous administration that hate this country. They truly do. And I think they were kind of executing a cloud piven strategy in which if you want to bring about massive change to society, you have to create chaos and you have to collapse certain cultural institutions and the economics of it. Think about what is taking place when you have a unenforced open border and mass illegal immigration with open welfare systems. That is a recipe for absolute economic disaster for a country. And people are like, well, why did they do this? You're alluding to political power 100%. That was part of it and is part of it. I mean, look at the 2030 census. Even without some of these numbers being cleaned out, Republicans stand to gain about 13 electoral votes into primarily the Sun Belt, roughly. And California is going to lose seats. We'll pick up again 13 House seats because of this. That's with what I consider flawed numbers. So the reason they are fighting this so hard, the left, is because if you actually clean out the census numbers by 2030, do you add maybe another 10 or 12 seats to those 13? I mean, this could be a seismic shift in American politics. And Democrats realized if we don't fight this, we're going to have a really hard time regaining political power. And God forbid they actually should. Because all of this that we are seeing in the streets of L. A was deeply intentional, not only of hatred for the American people, but also for political power.

Vince (38:49)

So I think you're right. I think oftentimes on the right, we've made the mistake of trying to choose one explanation for this. And the reality is there's sort of an all of the above approach to understanding this. You have the neo Marxists, you have the people who think that this country shouldn't exist and want to destroy it. You've got the cloud, PIV and chaos push going on. You've got people like Gavin Newsom who are paid to turn a blind eye to this, who rely on these institutions for political support. You have people who are looking to pad the numbers for the American left in the electoral college and the congressional districts. There's clearly an all of the above explanation here. And I wanna dwell on a point you just made a moment ago, because I feel like it can't be emphasized enough. The left has no other principle than power. There's no other principle that's undergirding their approach to politics, which is why for years they can tell us that demand rather the separation of church and state. There's no way those two things can be intertwined. And then Once they're in power, turn around and pay off religious organizations to traffic human beings into the United States using your stolen money.

Justin (39:55)

Yeah, you couldn't have said it better, Vince. And I also want to dismiss that idea that somehow there's a separation of religious beliefs and politics. We're all people of faith. Everybody is right. There's no perfect human knowledge set based off finite thinking and a finite mind that has all of the solutions and answers to every aspect of life. It's just not. I mean, if you were to think through that. So at a certain point, there's an element of faith in every last human being. And we all have a set of presuppositions and biases by which we view the world around us and make choices as to whether what is right or wrong. Mine is obviously based on a transcendent creator, immortal soul, all these things. But even the left has a faith system. They have a series of presuppositions and biases based off an element of faith by which they actually make their decisions. So when they look at us and go, oh, no, we're. We believe in scientism. We're not people of faith. No, you're not. You're people of faith as well. And so certain faith system is going to win out in the public arena. So I really am strongly reacting to this whole idea that somehow you're just based on faith and we're based on science. No, we're all people of faith, and someone's worldview is going to win out and it better be ours.

Vince (41:06)

Well, they have religious garb, too, that they wear. Yeah, they have a cream. They wear T shirts that say abolish ice. They've got the COVID masks. They have the pride flags. They have the purple hair dye. Each of these are all components of religiosity expressed as if it's like a part of, like a normal political debate.

Justin (41:27)

Yeah, no, 100% there is a religious creed for the left. I mean, politics is their religion. I mean, we could go off on this for a long time. I just want to make this point. Politics is the religion of the left. Their holy of holies is the administrative state and power by which they want to have that power to then be able to dictate to the dirty little peasants what's best for them. But the problem has been the dirty little peasants, the American people have been resisting progress. And I think that's also another element of what we're seeing take place with this illegal alien invasion. Well, if you dirty little peasants don't know what's best for you, we're just simply going to have to replace you to create wards of the state that will do whatever we want, give us political power, and then we'll be able to shape society into what we actually want in the future. So, you know, there's a lot of different moving parts on this, but understand we are up against religious zealots. They have a religious creed and ours had better win out because their vision for the future has nothing to do with the founders, has nothing to do with natural rights or human dignity on any level. And we need to accept that and face that and go, we better beat this religious zealots and meet them with our own passion, because if we don't, we will lose.

Vince (42:38)

So is it possible? So, in other words, are consequences enough to stamp this out? So right now we've lived in kind of a consequence free culture for left wing questions of power. If a lefty, if a lefty acts tyrannically, they're almost never held accountable for it. Or if they are, it's just a slap on the wrist. The Trump administration is trying to undertake some effort to have accountability. Lamonica McIver just had a bunch of grand jury indictments unsealed this week against her. That's important. She assaulted federal officers. She should be held accountable for it. Makes total sense to me. The Trump administration is now sending National Guard, United States Marines into LA to try and restore order there. If there are consequences, does the left learn lessons from that? Or is that kind of zealotry that you just described so entrenched that. Well, I don't want to be a total pessimist, but that it's over, that there's no way out of this thing.

Justin (43:34)

Well, I don't think we have much in common, if anything, with the UN American left. Like I said, this is a religious quest for them to have power. I think the only way you actually get. First of all, we do live in a consequence free society writ large. People are oftentimes not exposed to the consequences of their decisions. And when people are not exposed to those consequences the next time around, the behavior is even worse. And so I absolutely believe that people need to be held accountable for a lot of egregious behavior over the previous 10 years. And I think the left should in the immediate be exposed to the consequences of their terrible, intentional decisions on this illegal alien invasion. But I think the only way we get back to normal. Vince, if we're being honest, since we have nothing in common with the UN American left, is you have to beat them into unconditional surrender politically. And this is why I've started to become not obsessed. But we have to focus in our own way and the proper perspective on political power. And we should be organizing a lot of our efforts in 26, 2830 before the census kicks in, on how do you actually maintain political power to make sure they never see it again as we implement the right policies for this country. So to me, it's very cut and dried. You will never find common ground with the UN American left. And so the only real solution moving forward is to make sure they never see political power again.

Vince (44:54)

Yeah, well, God willing, you're right that that happens. They deserve the wilderness they find themselves in right now.

Justin (45:00)

100%.

Vince (45:00)

Okay, let me ask you about reining in the government, because I find this to be very important, too. I don't think this is an either or. I think both of these are required. We have to deport every illegal we can get our hands on. And we've gotta cut government spending pretty aggressively. And this week, the House is considering a $9 billion rescissions package. This is, as you and I discussed in the first place, it's just a starter package. This is a very small amount of spending we're asking Congress to consider cutting. The House is expected to go through final passage today. But apparently behind the scenes, Ned, and you may have a better perspective on this than I do, that the arm twisting has been difficult just to get the $9 billion signed off on. As of midday yesterday, there were at least 10 Republican holdouts who were still kind of squeamish about cutting pbs, NPR and USAID spending. What is going on here, Ned?

Justin (45:57)

Well, again, it goes back to a Republican majority. Has to be a majority of America first before you actually see are going to see legitimate progress made on some of this. But let's just go. Let's talk about this. First of all, the big beautiful bill codifies Trump's campaign promises. These things have to be done specifically on immigration. 175 billion for border wall. 10,000 new ICE agents, no less than a million deportations, all these great things. 701 miles of the border wall, which is amazing. But I just want to remind people you have to fix that illegal immigration problem because it is a hidden tax on the American people that about 150 billion a year that illegal aliens are costing us as a country. So think of it as cost savings on that front. There's 1.6 trillion in mandatory savings in the big beautiful bill. The CBO Not a friend of Trump's actually made the point that over the next decade his tariffs could reduce the federal deficit by 2.8 trillion. And then we get to this whole idea of rescissions, right? There are Republicans that are problematic. We will always have that from out of the blue states, Republicans who are not quite on the same page with us. I think this is pretty easy. So I'm a little staggered that a 9 billion rescissions package on USAID, NPR, PBS, all these things that should be a slam dunk. But where I think we're going to actually end up in August. Speaking of cutting spending, the whole idea of pocket rescissions. And you and I kind of, I was alluding to this the last time we were on. And then the White House like, don't, let's not talk about this for a couple of weeks. But now I can, I think on August 18, you're going to see a lot of rescissions sent to Congress. Has to be within the last 45 days of a fiscal year which ends September 30th for these rescissions to kick in. And I actually asked OMB folks, how much do you think we could actually cut in spending? Is it a trillion? They're like, no, it's not a trillion, but it's hundreds of billions of dollars. So you start to think through, if we cut out the cost of illegal immigration, we have the mandatory savings, the savings from using the tariffs and reducing the federal deficit. Pocket rescissions. Now we're actually talking trillions upon trillions. That's, that's legitimate money, Benz. And it's just the first year of the Trump administration. We have to keep the majorities in 26 to keep the progress going. But we're making progress here. And I want people to just understand there is a plan in place.

Vince (48:15)

Okay, so let me, I want to put a finer point on pocket rescissions because the rescissions were an alien concept, I think, to most people. Now we're getting into an even deeper level, pocket rescissions. Look, the White House has a handbook, a guide here on where they can start cutting. It's Doge. Doge has found something like what, 150, $160 billion in cuts. And so right away, after this 9 billion goes through on August 18th, all they have to say is, here's our Doge rescissions. Present that. And the upside is they don't need Congress at all. That's what you're talking about here. Because those 45 day, that 45 day window starts and it doesn't matter when it ends, it's over. And the effect, as I understand it, Ned, and confirm this for me, because the White House is cutting that spending in the closing days of the fiscal year. What that means is any continuing resolution going forward is not gonna include that spending anymore. So that cutoff is a permanent cutoff of the spending unless Congress comes up with new appropriations. Right.

Justin (49:17)

And the other thing, too, that I think is really beautiful about pocket decisions, Congress would have to go out of its way to actually overturn those rescissions, which, again, we've got some problematic Republicans in the House and obviously in the Senate, they would have to side with Democrats to overturn these rescissions, but it would have to be an overt act by Congress to actually overturn these rescissions. And I love that. I mean, let's face it, most people in Congress are not exactly profiles in political courage. They would prefer to duck the really hard decisions, apparently, on spending as well. And I think this is, this is actually a beautiful solution because it requires Congress to actually do nothing, sit on their hands and simply let these decisions go into. Into reality, become into effect.

Vince (50:01)

So I totally agree with you and I love that. I love get them on the record. Show us who you really are. I love that. But the other piece of this, Ned, is the White House hasn't actually told us which cuts they wanna present in August. And I wonder about the strategy of this because as far as I'm concerned, it sounds to me like the White House doesn't wanna add any noise to the debate right now. Their goal is they wanna get the big, beautiful bill passed, and they do want at least a few rescissions to be cut. But other than that, the last thing they wanna do is create any sort of other political liabilities by being explicit about that August 18th date and what they want to do with it going forward. Is that your view?

Justin (50:37)

Yes, absolutely. I think they are. They are almost wholly focused on getting this big, beautiful bill passed the Senate. Obviously, there's going to be tweaks. Go back to the House, they're going to reconcile it all, send it to Trump, get it done. And I do think the Senate's going to pass by July 4th, before July 4th, the big, beautiful bill, what that reconciliation between the House and the Senate bills look like. I think I would hope it's done by the August recess. I don't know how the White House feels about that, but that's kind of what I'm expecting. Don't leave town until you actually get this passed and onto Trump's desk and then we can go into the budget cycle, we can get into the rescissions process a couple of weeks after that, and we can really focus on cutting the spending, which there's no debate here that we actually have to have a serious conversation about cutting spending. But that's not the time. Now is not the time to have it, especially with the big beautiful bill. That comes later. And I think there's actually a very legitimate plan and I think the White House is leaving it until they get through the big beautiful bill.

Vince (51:36)

Okay, so I had Senator Rand Paul on with me yesterday and his core objection continues to be the debt ceiling hike. He says five, I don't wanna raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. I can't vote for that. If we do that, we can't say we're conservative anymore. This is what he said. So he says he's been saying that if we just get rid of that debt ceiling component to the big beautiful bill, I can support it. There are other elements, there's some elements I disagree with, but I'll vote yes on it if the debt ceiling thing is out of it. Here's Ned, the quandary. I think that he's in because as a practical matter, and again, you tell me if I'm right about this. If he separates the debt ceiling out with or without Rand Paul and if this package goes through or not, that debt ceiling is going to be raised by Congress. That is just a certainty that that's going to happen. What Rand is suggesting, though, is I want to give Chuck Schumer power over the legislation that does that. That's the effect of what he's saying. Am I right?

Justin (52:30)

That's exactly the point I was going to make. So range you want to have a debate with Chuck Schumer every three months about raising the debt ceiling, he is going to extract a pound of flesh out of us every time. So let's just get it done. Let's have this conversation right now so we don't find ourselves every few months having to, to ask Chuck Schumer to help us out on raising the debt ceiling. Because we're going to need Democrats to do that through that process and kind of put ourselves of our own volition, hostage to Chuck Schumer and his pet little projects that are going to benefit Democrats in the left. Like, I think the entire strategy is kind of insane. And I think the only reason that Rand Paul and Thomas Massie are getting away with some of this stuff is it does get a little complicated in the whole process of everything. So they're making all these arguments, but I think it's a little hard for the lay people, the people are out there living their normal lives to fully understand, but what they are advocating to me kind of borders on political stupidity.

Vince (53:27)

I agree. Yeah. And, you know, he didn't bring it up yesterday in our interview, but he's been citing this number. He says that I don't know why we're spending all this money on the border wall. I think you cited a number here. It was like 170 billion or something. 150. And he says he's quoting numbers. He's quoting numbers. He's like, it should only cost us 65 billion or 6.5 billion. He said 6.5 billion. Why are we spending all this other money? And I looked into where he got the math from. He was quoting what it would take to build 1,000 miles of pedestrian wall from a 2009 GAO report. And he's not talking about that. This is a multi layered approach. The Trump administration wants to build pedestrian wall. They want to build roads along the side of the border. They want to build water barriers. They want to build a multilayered 2400 miles worth of variable layers in order to fully secure our border. So Rand's not even having the same conversation as the White House is having about what to build on the border.

Justin (54:24)

It's, again, I don't want to attribute too many things to Rand, but it's pretty disingenuous what he's doing right now, especially on those costs. The wall that I want vents. People should go look at the border wall between Gaza and Egypt. That's the border wall. I want for us on our southern border just to make sure that people understand you're not coming through. We're done with this, and we're not going to allow another illegal alien invasion to take place. So I think, again, going back to some of the process and some of the numbers, I don't think that people are being fully honest in this debate on a whole host of fronts.

Vince (55:03)

Okay, last, last thing on the wall, the wall, people need to understand is a durable thing that is hard to overturn by executive order. So when it comes to Washington, with the changing of power and the changing of administrations, so much changes. We saw it during Biden. So much changes so rapidly, and our country gets invaded. Regardless of what happens electorally, if Trump succeeds in fortifying our southern border, it gets a lot more difficult for the left to, to tear that down. They'll try, but that is a lot more difficult to get rid of once it's actually built.

Justin (55:37)

100%. And that's an excellent point because we have to create human history tells us at some point, as much as I want to send them into permanent exile into the political wilderness, Democrats will probably regain political power at some point in the future. We have to make structural changes that makes. They're getting back to political power that much harder. Their implementation of their twisted war policies that much harder. I mean, this is one of them. If you put in this. This bill funds 701 miles of the southern border wall, you put these structural changes, and no matter what they want to do in the future, I hope it's a very distant future before they get political power. It makes it that much harder for them to do what they've done to us the last four years.

Vince (56:21)

Yeah, big time. All right. We got to get our country back. And you are working on that. Please, please, keep plugging away, Ned, and figure out a way to keep Democrats from ever getting political power back so we don't have to worry about all this. Thank you very much. Good to talk to you, sir. Really appreciate you.

Justin (56:36)

All right, man. I appreciate it.

Vince (56:39)

The great Ned Ryan from American Majority. That guy's a star. Love having him on the show and digging into this. And so that is the number. That's the date to look out for August 18th. Ladies and gentlemen, August 18th continues to be the number to look out for on the White House coming in and saying, these are the cuts we're making Congress, you can join us in this party. You don't have to, because if you don't, that's just as good. We will cut the government permanently in a really big way on August 18th. Now, Ned is hearing that. I've heard Russ Vogt, the head of the Office of Management and Budget, talking about pocket rescissions over and over and over again. By and large, the media has sort of ignored this. I'm not ignoring it. Ned's not ignoring it. I know you're not ignoring it. That's a very, very big deal. So we're gonna keep attuned to that. And in the meantime, I don't wanna say keep the pressure up, but. Yeah, go ahead, keep the pressure up. Just keep reminding the president of the United States and the White House we care about this. We absolutely wanna cut spending. Step one, of course, is getting our country back, though. We gotta get our sovereignty back. Build that wall and. And get the illegals out. That's what the Big, beautiful bill will do. Hopefully, Rand Paul meets with President Trump at that picnic and he comes to his senses and he says, I gotta vote for this thing. I gotta vote for this thing. I want my country back. I definitely do. My thanks as always, guys, for all your support. For those of you who are looking for Major, who will be sleeping tonight on my bolin branch sheets, at least for a time. He stays with us for like an hour and then he'll jump off at some point and go to his dog bed. Major will be with me tomorrow because it's Friday. We'll have Major on the show. I'll be home Friday. Home studio. Major will be there. My guess is he'll be lying down and he'll be enjoying the show. It's soothing for him. It's soothing to follow along. Thank you to all of you. Hey, by the way, somebody said let's get Vince's numbers way up here. Yes, please, let's keep doing that. If you have friends or family who are unaware of the program, please share it. If you have social media accounts where you've got some people following, I don't care if you have two people following you or 2 million people. I'd be super grateful if you'd support this program. I think we're doing something useful each and every day, very informative here on the show. So please, please help us get the word out. And I've got the radio show, the big national radio show coming up 12 to 3 Eastern Time. Find out your local radio listings at TheVinchow.com or watch us live. Rumble.com Vince, always appreciate you joining me here. The best damn audience in media.