Can the Trump Administration Undo the Sexual Revolution?

Summary

Podcast Summary: What A Day – Episode: "Can the Trump Administration Undo the Sexual Revolution?"

Release Date: December 7, 2024
Host: Jane Coaston, Crooked Media

---

Introduction

In this compelling episode of What A Day, hosted by Jane Coaston from Crooked Media, the discussion centers on the potential efforts of the Trump administration to reverse decades of progress made during the Sexual Revolution. Titled "Can the Trump Administration Undo the Sexual Revolution?", the episode delves into the intricate dynamics between policy changes, gender roles, and societal norms, offering a profound analysis of the current political climate and its implications for the future of gender equality in the United States.

---

Background: The Conservative Pushback

The episode opens with Erin Ryan highlighting the strained relationship between American men and women, exacerbated by Donald Trump's reelection campaign, which seemingly aimed to revert societal norms to a more patriarchal structure. Ryan introduces "Project 2025," a conservative initiative designed to undermine women's and LGBTQ+ rights established over the past decades. This project seeks to create a bifurcated society where "married straight guys" hold a privileged status over everyone else.

Erin Ryan [00:00]: "Rights many of us had all but taken for granted for generations... are now in the crosshairs of an empowered conservative bloc eager to turn this country into a place where there are two tiers of citizenship."

---

Policy Changes and Their Societal Impacts

Rebecca Traister, an author and New York Magazine writer, provides an in-depth analysis of how policy and sexual politics interconnect, creating feedback loops that significantly shape American society. Traister emphasizes the historical context, referencing pivotal Supreme Court decisions that legalized birth control and abortion, which in turn propelled social and economic shifts allowing women greater autonomy.

Rebecca Traister [02:23]: "There are the shifting social patterns and sexual patterns and romantic patterns... that enabled a bunch of social shifts around how women and men could live their romantic, sexual, reproductive, familial lives."

The discussion progresses to highlight the tangible actions taken by individuals to safeguard their reproductive rights in anticipation of potential rollbacks. Statistics reveal a surge in vasectomies, sterilizations, emergency contraception stockpiling, and a staggering 1200% increase in Planned Parenthood appointments for IUD placements.

Erin Ryan [02:23]: "There's been an uptick in vasectomies and permanent sterilization among Americans of reproductive age."

Moreover, the episode explores the conservative narrative attacking birth control, exemplified by misinformation spread by influential figures like Elon Musk. Musk falsely claims that hormonal birth control leads to severe mental health issues and personality changes, a claim debunked by experts but still pervasive in certain circles.

Elon Musk [06:16]: "Hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide... it changes their personality."

Ryan counters these claims, clarifying that while there is a minor risk of increased depression (1%), Musk's assertions are largely unfounded.

---

Historical Context: Lessons from the Past

Drawing parallels to the mid-20th century, the episode examines previous conservative efforts to reinforce traditional gender roles. Post-World War II America saw a push for women to return to homemaking after contributing significantly to the workforce during the war. This period, often romanticized as the "1950s nuclear family" era, was marked by government policies that enforced conformity and suppressed progressive changes.

Rebecca Traister [13:22]: "The median marriage age for women fell to 20 in 1960 because the government made it so... it is possible for the government to make laws and change policies in a way that forces changes in marriage patterns."

However, this enforced conformity led to widespread dissatisfaction and rebellion, culminating in movements like the women's liberation movement of the 1970s. Traister warns that similar patterns are re-emerging under the current conservative agenda, suggesting that history may repeat itself with renewed vigor.

---

Conservative Strategies: Project 2025’s Comprehensive Assault

Project 2025 isn't limited to reproductive rights; it encompasses a broad spectrum of conservative policies aimed at restructuring societal norms. These include restrictions on abortion, rolling back no-fault divorce laws, targeting LGBTQ+ rights, and dismantling social welfare programs. The overarching goal is to reaffirm traditional gender roles, positioning men as the primary breadwinners and authority figures while relegating women to domestic roles.

Erin Ryan [07:03]: "But the incoming Trump administration is not just planning on putting its thumb on the scale. It wants to slam its fist down on the scale because contraception isn't the only product of social progress that conservatives are targeting."

The episode underscores the economic ramifications of such policies. By forcing women out of the workforce and back into homemaking roles, Project 2025 threatens to derail decades of economic progress and gender parity, potentially leading to an economic downturn exacerbated by a reduced labor force and limited consumer spending.

---

Resistance and Future Implications

Despite the aggressive push by conservative factions, there is substantial resistance from the public. Recent state referendums, particularly on abortion laws, have shown that a significant majority opposes the rollback of these rights, even in regions that traditionally lean conservative. This indicates a societal shift and a robust defense of the advances achieved during the Sexual Revolution.

Rebecca Traister [16:18]: "What you're then going to have is another massive explosion... you have a majority of this that is going to kick and scream against the reimposition of these norms."

The episode also touches upon emerging social movements, such as the purported "4B movement" inspired by South Korea, where young women are advocating for no involvement with men in any capacity. While this movement is still in nascent stages in the U.S., it symbolizes the deep-seated frustrations and the potential for significant societal changes if gender equality is further undermined.

---

Historical Insights and Future Prospects

Rebecca Traister provides a historical lens, reflecting on past government attempts to influence personal lives through marriage programs. She critiques the ineffectiveness of such programs during the George W. Bush and Obama administrations, which failed to significantly alter marriage or divorce rates. Instead, Traister argues that comprehensive welfare and job training programs that foster economic stability have a more substantial impact on family formation and stability.

Rebecca Traister [20:19]: "The hard right... is much more likely to backfire. If people actually cared about family formation, ... more government programs to better support communities would stabilize marriage patterns."

This perspective suggests that genuine support for families through economic and social programs is a more effective strategy than coercive policies aiming to enforce traditional gender roles. The episode posits that without such support systems, conservative efforts are destined to fail and possibly provoke even greater backlash.

---

Conclusion: The Road Ahead

The episode concludes on a hopeful yet cautionary note. Despite the formidable efforts of the conservative agenda to dismantle decades of progress, the resilience and adaptability of societal norms, coupled with active resistance from the public, suggest that undoing the Sexual Revolution would not only be challenging but also potentially self-defeating. The interplay between policy, societal values, and individual rights continues to shape the trajectory of gender equality in America, with the future hinging on the collective will to uphold the gains achieved thus far.

Erin Ryan [21:28]: "It's just kidding. I'm not going to leave you on something that dark... One of my favorite old songs, Loretta Lynn's the Pill."

In essence, What A Day provides a thorough exploration of the current political landscape's impact on gender relations, underscored by historical insights and expert analysis, making it an indispensable listen for those keen on understanding the ongoing struggle for gender equality in America.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Erin Ryan [00:00]: "Rights many of us had all but taken for granted for generations... are now in the crosshairs of an empowered conservative bloc eager to turn this country into a place where there are two tiers of citizenship."

• Rebecca Traister [02:23]: "There are the shifting social patterns and sexual patterns and romantic patterns... that enabled a bunch of social shifts around how women and men could live their romantic, sexual, reproductive, familial lives."

• Elon Musk [06:16]: "Hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide... it changes their personality."

• Rebecca Traister [13:22]: "The median marriage age for women fell to 20 in 1960 because the government made it so... it is possible for the government to make laws and change policies in a way that forces changes in marriage patterns."

• Rebecca Traister [20:19]: "The hard right... is much more likely to backfire. If people actually cared about family formation, ... more government programs to better support communities would stabilize marriage patterns."

---

Produced by Erin Ryan and Max Fisher, with contributions from Emma Ilick Frank, Evan Sutton, Jordan Kanter, Kyle Segland, Charlotte Landis, Vasilis Vitopolis, Leo Duran, Raven Yamamoto, and Adrian Hill.

Transcript

[Erin Ryan]

Even before Donald Trump was reelected, on the heels of a campaign that relied at least in part, on promises to return America to a time when men were in charge and women were subjugated, it was clear that the relationship between American men and women was, shall we say, strained. Rights many of us had all but taken for granted for generations, like no fault divorce, access to contraception and abortion, as well as newer but still cherished rights like access to gender affirming health care and same sex marriage, are now in the crosshairs of an empowered conservative bloc eager to turn this country into a place where there are two tiers of citizenship. Married straight guys and Everybody else. Project 2025 calls for the government to stop barely short of forcing women back into a state of subservience, gay people back into the closet, and America back to the 1950s. But can the government actually do that? I'm Erin Ryan, and this is How We Got Here, a series that explores a big question behind the week's headlines and tells a story that answers that question. Folks, Max Fisher is out this week, which means that I have run completely amok. And so we're going to talk about one of the issues that's been on my mind for the last, oh, 15 years or so. The relationship between men and women in this country and the push pull between female empowerment and male resentment that we're now seeing come to a head. Since the election was called for Donald Trump, people have been scared that the incoming president is going to do what he says he's going to do, take women and LGBTQ people down a few notches by rolling back their rights. And people are taking action to protect themselves. There's been an uptick in vasectomies and permanent sterilization among Americans of reproductive age. Women are stockpiling emergency contraception and abortion medication. Planned Parenthood has seen a 1200% rise in appointments to get IUDs placed and a public service announcement. If you've got a uterus, it's time to re up. These puppies last eight years now, and if you get an IUD today, it could very well outlive some of the bozos trying to legislate away your rights. So to dive into this, I called up author and New York magazine writer at large, Rebecca Traister. Rebecca covers the intersection of gender, politics and society and is the author of several books, including 2016's all the Single Ladies and 2020's Good and Mad. We started by talking about how policy and sexual politics form a kind of feedback loop. That shapes American society as a whole.

[Rebecca Traister]

There are the shifting social patterns and sexual patterns and romantic patterns. And those are shifting, in part thanks to policy changes that we're going back, like, decades to look at the policy changes, right? Like the legalization not only of abortion, but the legalization of birth control, first for married people in 1965 and then for single people in 1972. A lot of people don't know those were two separate Supreme Court decisions, which is alarming. You know, changes in, like, women's ability to have their own credit cards or to vote. Like, there are all these things that happened in our past, some of which are very far back and some of which are not that far back, that enabled a bunch of social shifts around how women and men could live their romantic, sexual, reproductive, familial lives. And it opened up a whole variety of new paths in the past few decades. Then you have what I see as a political reaction to a lot of those shifts and the sort of pushing back against those new kinds of liberties. And the new kinds of liberties, to be clear, mean marrying, later, cohabitating outside of marriage, certainly marriage equality, having children out of wedlock without it being a massive social stigma. And what you're seeing, what you've seen in the past few years, decades building slowly, but then the results really bearing fruit in the past few years is the political conservative pushback against those kinds of liberties. So most obviously, you see the overturn of Roe with the Dobbs to. You see Republicans coming for no fault divorce in lots of states. You see incursions on birth control. You see the promise of further erosion of the access to those kinds of things which really, in the grand scheme of American history, had only recently been legalized.

[Erin Ryan]

Just to build off that. These changes have implications beyond how people live their lives. The way we socialize also influences where we want to live, what kind of businesses we frequent, how much money we have to spend, and on what the timing and size of one's family is. The biggest financial decision that many of us will make in our lifetimes. Multiply that by millions, and it's clear that the availability of comprehensive reproductive health care can reshape society. Here's a tiny, but actually huge example. The Pill. Before the Pill, women did not have a discrete contraceptive option that they fully controlled. After the pill was made legal for unmarried women, as Rebecca mentioned in 1972, women's place in society transformed. In 1970, incoming classes in American law schools were 90% male. Medical schools and dental schools were 95% male. But by 1980, incoming classes in those professional post grad programs were 1/3 female. And in the 20232024 academic year, women outnumbered men in medical school enrollment, 54% of first year med students are women. Project 2025, among other things, aims to claw back some of the control that women have over their own bodies, not just by making birth control more difficult for women to access through changes in policy, but also by tarnishing its reputation in the culture. There's actually a clip going around social media a while back featuring a speaker at conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation's event, calling for a return to a time when sex was more risky. I mean for women, obviously.

[Rebecca Traister]

It seems to me that a good.

[Unknown Speaker 1]

Place to start would be a feminist.

[Rebecca Traister]

Movement against the pill and for rewilding.

[Unknown Speaker 1]

Sex, returning the danger to sex, returning the intimacy and really the consequentiality to sex.

[Erin Ryan]

In recent years, conservatives have been almost creepily apoplectic about the so called dangers of birth control, seeding social media with claims that hormonal birth control can make people crazy or that it forces people to be attracted to less masculine men and thus when the time comes to come off birth control and get pregnant, ostensibly produce subpar offspring. Here's Elon Musk parroting some of those falsehoods with Tucker Carlson on a set that looks like it was inspired by Purgatory.

[Elon Musk]

I think maybe a lot of women are unaware that hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide and changes their preferences on who they want to marry or have kids with. It changes their personality. It does say this on the box, by the way.

[Erin Ryan]

Caution may change your personality.

[Elon Musk]

Yes, if the warnings has significant risk of depression, significant increase in suicide, and will make you want to go out with people that you don't actually like. That's actually true, by the way.

[Erin Ryan]

I know my skin will be crawling for the rest of the day, but moving along, I just want to note that everything Musk is claiming here is scientifically false, except for the fact that hormonal birth control can increase your risk of depression by a whopping 1%. Which is not surprising because Elon Musk is neither a doctor nor a scientist. He's just a weirdo with darting eyes of somebody who is definitely not using too much ketamine. Dunking on Elana aside, even making it a little bit more difficult for people to access safe and affordable contraception in abortion would be tantamount to the government putting its thumb on the scale to get at least some women out of grad school and back into the kitchen. But the incoming Trump administration is not just planning on putting its thumb on the scale. It wants to slam its fist down on the scale because contraception isn't the only product of social progress that conservatives are targeting. They're going after abortion, like I mentioned. They're going after no fault divorce like Rebecca mentioned. They're going after social welfare programs, public schools, trans rights, gay marriage, and anti discrimination and equal pay laws. Project 2025, if you look at it holistically, is an attempt to completely realign gender roles in American society so that men can feel tough and and important again. Which ultimately is probably what MAGA Make America Great Again has meant all along for women. When sex has a high likelihood of resulting in pregnancy because birth control isn't available, terminating a pregnancy is difficult to impossible because abortion is illegal, no paid family leave exists, childcare is astronomically expensive, and there are no laws to prevent an employer from refusing to hire you or promote you because you're a woman. It kind of feels like their vision for the proper role of American women in American society is pretty clear. And also they keep saying it out loud.

[Harrison Butker]

I think it is you, the women who have had the most diabolical lies told to you. How many of you are sitting here now about to cross this stage and are thinking about all the promotions and titles you are going to get in your career? Some of you may go on to lead successful careers in the world, but I would venture to guess that the majority of you are most excited about your marriage and the children you will bring into this world.

[Erin Ryan]

That was Kansas City Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker speaking at a college commencement, for some reason giving off the same energy as Liesl's Nazi boyfriend in the Sound of Music. The sudden presence of influencers projecting a so called trad wife lifestyle is also no coincidence. In order for anti feminist backlash to truly hold, women have to believe that they're choosing to give up their rights in favor of a softer, simpler life. Wouldn't your life be easier if rather than getting up every morning to go to a job where you weren't appreciated, you got to spend your days bandying about making bread from scratch and pristine anthropologie maxi dresses while your adoring tow headed and perfectly behaved children look on with adoration? Wouldn't it be easier to just stop trying and be cared for? Now, as a mother of two small children, I have to say anybody who's ever spent time looking after kids knows that motherhood involves a lot more body bodily fluids and sweatpants than it does bread kneading and fashion. And if you think your boss is a dick now, you've never been ordered around by a three year old transitioning out of their afternoon nap. But I'm not in the target audience for trad wife content. They're going after very young women who don't know any better and by the time they learn that stay at home parenting is a labor activity and not a leisure activity, they've already double knotted their egg apron.

[Unknown Speaker 1]

Water Day is brought to you by Quince. Quince lets you treat your loved ones and yourself to everyday luxury at an affordable price. Quint partners directly with top factories, cutting out the cost of the middleman which passes the savings on to you. I love my Quint sweaters. I get cold very easily, which is funny because I live in Los Angeles. But Quint's has been perfect. Perfect for the transition between summer to fall to whatever LA does that's winter. So I would love to get more quince sweaters and maybe a scarf. And let's look into some bedding too. Go to quince.com wad for 365 day returns plus free shipping on your order. That's Q U I n c e.com wad this show is sponsored by BetterHelp. The holiday season is supposedly the most wonderful time of the year, but scheduling conflicts, expenses, family drama, it can take a toll. It's important not to lose sight of your mental well being. BetterHelp Online therapy is a great way to get into therapy. BetterHelp is designed to be convenient, flexible and built around your schedule. Fill out a questionnaire to get matched with a licensed therapist that fits your needs and preferences. Visit betterhelp.com wad today to get 10% off your first month. That's BetterHelp. H E L p.com wad what a day is brought to you by Sling Seems like things change every 20 minutes. It's hard to keep up. That's why you should watch Sling. They provide the best value for your essential news channels. With Sling, you get all of your favorite news channels at the best price. Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, Hannity, Anderson Cooper, 360, the Rachel Maddow show, and more for just $40 a month. So yeah, with the election coverage and everything else happening, you can get news that will raise your blood pressure at prices that won't get the best price on news about what's going on in the world. Then say that's what's going on in the world and it's not just news. Check this out. Sling has the live sports, news and entertainment channels you love and less of the ones you don't, so you save hundreds of dollars. Sling lets you choose and customize your channel lineup so you can choose the channels you actually like. Sling's cloud DVR lets you record your shows to watch in your schedule. There's no complex technology, no long term contracts, and no hidden rigmarole. I need to be able to watch football and I need to be able to watch football on my schedule. That's why I love Sling. Get rewarded for watching your favorite news channels. Sling lets you do that. Visit sling.com now to learn more and get started. That's sling.com now. Sling.com now.

[Erin Ryan]

Conservative forces in the U.S. have tried to nudge women backwards before. In the middle of the last century it was more like a shove. When soldiers returned from World War II in a nation of Rosie the Riveters were told, thank you very much for all the hard work, but you can go home and make a pot roast. Now here's Rebecca again.

[Rebecca Traister]

This is the period that is romanticized in the way that a lot of people in power tell America's history that there was this period of the 1950s and 1960s where, like that nuclear family, which was in fact entirely modeled by the government, the median marriage age for women fell to 20 in 1960 because the government made it so, right? So we should all be aware that it is possible for the government to make laws and change policies in a way that forces changes in marriage patterns.

[Erin Ryan]

As idealized as this era was, women weren't happy. They were being medicated, they were being lobotomized. Go ahead and look up the history of Valium for a really unfun read about how that whole thing played out. There was a lot of despair tucked away in the domestic bliss of mid century America. We should also note here that as the white nuclear family was being hailed as a paragon of virtue that every Caucasian was obligated to participate in or face the social consequences, the government was systematically dismantling the black family, cutting their neighborhoods off from suburbs and commerce districts with freeways, allowing banks to refuse to issue home loans to black borrowers, and forcing black children to attend underfunded and subpar schools. Okay, so let's come back to the present day. In the same vein of valuing some families more than others, Project 2025 also waxes poetic about the need to bring back the so called traditional marriages through coercive lawmaking meant to work in tandem with shifts in social expectations. Here's Rebecca again.

[Rebecca Traister]

It's so clear that what the people who want to return to older patterns around hetero coupling, which means early sort of compulsory hetero marriage, where men have a disproportionate share of the power both inside the home and outside the home, and women bear a disproportionate share of the responsibility for domestic and familial labor and less opportunity to have any kind of economic stability or independence outside of the home.

[Unknown Speaker 1]

Right.

[Rebecca Traister]

That's what they want. And you can see that in the move against divorce laws. You can see it in the exaltation of guys who've been very violent within their marriages. Look at the Republican convention where you had Hulk Hogan, the Ultimate Fighting Champion president, both of whom have been a. Of domestic violence, where you had Tucker Carlson, who's been accused of sexual harassment, the entire Trump cabinet, which. This is a joke that I've seen elsewhere. It's not my own, but like affirmative action for sex pests, it's, you know.

[Erin Ryan]

It'S like a Mount Olympus kind of. Yes. Like, all of them represent different types.

[Rebecca Traister]

Of, like, different versions of, did you beat your wife? Did you rape somebody? Did you harass a babysitter?

[Harrison Butker]

Right.

[Rebecca Traister]

Like, this is Reim, possession of a very violent kind of male power, along with the taking away of the rights of people capable of pregnancy to actually control their own reproductive systems, their own bodies, to determine when, if, and under what circumstances they might have children. So it's the removal of all these rights from women at the same time that you are imaginatively holding up incredibly violent forms of masculinity.

[Erin Ryan]

But the big problem with this push and these skills schemes and the exaltation of this kind of archetype of scary, manly men, they don't work. They don't work. And not only do they not work in the long term, they backfire.

[Rebecca Traister]

I know, because I've looked at this history, that there are levers they can press that probably can create some shift. I don't think you can put it right back to where it was in 1960, but they can make things inaccessible to people. They can create dependency for women on men. They can do those kinds of things. But what you're then going to have is another massive explosion. The entire thing that the contemporary right wing is pushing back against is what happened in the middle of the 20th century, in part because they did this before. So the notion that, like, they did it and we had Norman Rockwell periods of, like, everybody sitting around, white people sitting around a turkey dinner or whatever, and that this was the idealized Leave it to Beaver, fuck family. That worked great until the 1970s when you had like women, nobody ever really burned their bras, but like, that was. That's the thing that so alarms contemporary conservatives and a hard right movement is you had all those people who were repressed by those policies being like, fuck this, we are going to change this country. And you had the eruptions that fundamentally altered the terrain. We have half or more of the population that is really straining against this. Look at the state referenda on abortion, right? Even in an election year in which Donald Trump won handily, you had 7 out of 10 and 8 counting Florida, with 57% of the majority voting against the kinds of restrictions that would enable this kind of reimposition of patriarchal control. You have a majority of this that is going to kick and scream against the reimposition of these norms.

[Erin Ryan]

Not only do we have an example of this sort of scheme not working in American history, we have contemporary examples of this scheme leading in other countries to women completely opting out of the system. I've been seeing a lot of content about American women protecting themselves from government attempts to force them into some kind of compulsory Susie Homemaker trad wife nightmare. Talking about adapting the principles of the South Korean 4B movement to roughly summarize, 4B is a call by fed up young women to say no to dating, having sex with, marrying or having children with men. Most of the aforementioned content about an American 4B movement seems frankly to be a little bit clickbaity, like there's no actual giant sex strike happening in the US there's no 4B movement in the US and the US and some South Korea are very different places with different cultural and social histories. And if you've been following international headlines this week, different problems in the political status quo as well. But the reasons that stories about American women saying screw it to screwing are landing right now is that as in South Korea, we're certainly grappling with power struggles over gender roles. And the implications of that power struggle could extend, extend well beyond sex, dating, other relationships. It could have huge implications for the way our cities look, the way our towns look, the way we socialize, what kind of businesses are available to us, because those things all happened on the heels of the sexual revolution. People get very jumpy when they imagine a future where women decide en masse that being involved with men at all is simply not worth it. And as far as I know, I don't think the Trump administration has any forced marriage policies on the table yet, but, you know, give them time. As inconvenient as the truth might be to the conservative plot to undo the sexual revolution, most government run attempts to promote procreative heterosexual marriage are actually big wastes of money and time. Though according to Traitser, there are some types of pro marriage programs that actually work.

[Rebecca Traister]

Both the George W. Bush administration and the Obama administration had poured billions of dollars into marriage programs trying to up the rates of marriage. They had not worked. Didn't work when I wrote all the single ladies. And I note that because I haven't been looking at the research over the past eight years. So I want to date this. There were two programs that I found that had actually worked to either staunch divorce rates or up marriage rates. And they were both welfare and job training programs in communities where accidentally, basically, the government had continued to give more money and create more economic stability for people. And as a result, that wasn't even what they were trying to do. More of those people either got married or stayed married. So the, like, hard right white patriarchal regime of insisting on marriage is much more likely to backfire. And if people actually cared about family formation, family stability, happiness, which is a lot of what the marriage worriers tend to say they're worried about, the best thing you could do was impose like a ton of new government programs, programs to better support communities, and you'd probably see the stabilization of marriage patterns and coupling of, you know, every flavor.

[Erin Ryan]

It's not lost on me that two of the groups of people most likely to vote for Kamala Harris, women in their reproductive years and LGBTQ Americans, are the ones who stand to be most impacted by the rollback of the sexual revolution. The people who voted for Trump, white people between 45 and 65 men, they're not the ones Project 2025 is trying to take down a peg or two. A desire to return to a different time in American history. This fantasy where men went to work and women stayed home and took care of their children while they waited for their husbands, that's not something Trump voters have volunteered themselves for. It's something they've volunteered other people for. Based on the fantasy that we can bring back meaning to the lives of young American men by agreeing to cosplay that. It's the 1950s again. We're not getting that economy back. And forcing that many women to step back from the workforce to be homemakers would be an unmitigated economic disaster. As Rebecca Traister and other students of history have noted, this won't end well for them. But hey, women not wanting something has not stopped Donald Trump before. All right, I'm going to let him play us out.

[Donald Trump]

They said, we think it's we think it's very inappropriate for you to say so. Why? I'm president. I want to protect the women of our country. They said. They said, sir, I just think it's inappropriate for you to say, I pay these guys a lot of money. Can you believe it? They said, well, I'm going to do it whether the women like it or not. I'm going to protect them. I'm going to protect them from migrants coming in. I'm going to protect them from foreign countries.

[Erin Ryan]

I'm just kidding. I'm not going to leave you on something that dark. I'm going to end on something a little bit more upbeat. One of my favorite old songs, Loretta Lynn's the Pill. I'm tired of all your crowing how you and your hens play While holding a couple in my arms Another's on the way this chicken's done for up her nest and I'm ready to make a deal and you can't afford to turn it down Cause you know I got the pill. All right, we'll be back next week and so will Max. How We Got Here is written and hosted by me, Max Fisher and Erin Ryan. Our producer is Emma Ilick Frank. Evan Sutton mixes and masters the show. Jordan Kanter, sound engineers the show. Audio support from Kyle Segland, Charlotte Landis and Vasilis Vitopolis. Production support from Leo Duran, Raven Yamamoto and Adrian Hill. Netcredit is here to say yes because you're More than a credit score. Apply in minutes and get a decision as soon as the same day. Loans offered by Netcredit or lending partner banks and service by NetCredit. Applications subject to review and approval. Learn [e-mail] partners. NetCredit credit to the People if you're.

[Donald Trump]

Ready to elevate your driving experience, the first ever Kia K4 is worth a closer look. It combines style and performance with a sleek, futuristic design. Featuring star map LED headlights and an available panoramic display for unforgettable looks. SiriusXM comes standard in every Kia K4, bringing you closer to what you love. Plus, with an available 190 horsepower turbocharged engine, the Kia K4 delivers everything driving enthusiasts crave. Learn [e-mail] K4.