GOP Rushes To Pass Trump's Big Beautiful Bill

Summary

Summary of "GOP Rushes To Pass Trump's Big Beautiful Bill" Episode on What A Day

Release Date: June 30, 2025

In this episode of What A Day, hosted by Jane Coaston of Crooked Media, the focus centers on the Republican Party's expedited efforts to pass President Donald Trump's significant legislative proposal, colloquially referred to as the "Big Beautiful Bill." The discussion delves into the bill's potential impacts, internal Republican dynamics, and the broader political implications surrounding its passage. Additionally, the episode touches upon other pertinent political developments, including Trump's maneuvers regarding TikTok and Israeli politics.

---

1. The Big Beautiful Bill: An Overview

Jane Coaston opens the episode by introducing the central topic: President Trump's push to secure the passage of the "Big Beautiful Bill" by July 4th. This ambitious timeline underscores the urgency and high stakes associated with the legislation.

Key Points:

• The bill represents the most substantial reduction to America's social safety net in decades.
• Under the proposed Senate version, the Congressional Budget Office projects that over 11 million Americans could lose healthcare coverage within the next decade.
• Significant cuts to food assistance programs and a substantial increase in funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are also included.
• The bill is expected to add trillions to the national debt, a point highlighted by Democratic Senator Patty Murray.

Notable Quote:

Patty Murray [01:34]: "Have you no shame if you think you can look the American people in the face and tell them we have to bring down the debt after passing what might be the most expensive bill in history?"

---

2. In-Depth Analysis with Alana Shore

Jane Coaston engages in a detailed conversation with Alana Shore, Senior Washington Editor for Semaphore, to dissect the nuances of the bill and its journey through Congress.

Major Differences Between Senate and House Versions:

• Medicaid Cuts: The Senate proposes more aggressive reductions to Medicaid, with ongoing debates among Republicans about the feasibility of these cuts. There is speculation about potential delays due to the contentious nature of these changes.

• Clean Energy Credits: The Senate version accelerates the phase-out of clean energy credits and introduces new taxes on wind and solar energy. Elon Musk has criticized the bill, asserting that it could devastate America's clean energy manufacturing sector.

Budgetary Concerns:

• The Congressional Budget Office estimates the bill will increase the national debt by over $3 trillion in the next decade.
• Millions could lose healthcare and food assistance, heightening the bill's controversy even among fiscal conservatives.

Notable Quote:

Alana Shore [02:29]: "The biggest difference is on Medicaid, there are much, much steeper cuts to the program under this bill."

---

3. Republican Internal Dynamics and Challenges

The episode explores the fractures within the Republican Party, highlighting the challenges of uniting diverse factions to support the bill.

Highlights:

• Fiscal Hawks vs. Party Pragmatists: While fiscal conservatives are concerned about the national debt, there is skepticism about their willingness to adhere strictly to deficit reduction principles when pressured by Trump and the White House.

• Key Figures and Votes:

  • Senators like Rand Paul and Mike Lee have exhibited resistance, with some capitulating under pressure.
  • Alaska's Lisa Murkowski remains a pivotal vote, with Republicans introducing provisions specifically to secure her support, such as tax breaks for whaling captains.
  • North Carolina's Thom Tillis has declared he won't seek reelection, citing frustration with colleagues prioritizing politics over constituents' needs.

Notable Quote:

Thom Tillis [06:16]: "Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who don't really give a damn about the people they promise to represent on the campaign trail."

---

4. Legislative Hurdles and House-Senate Reconciliation

Jane and Alana discuss the slim odds of the bill passing both chambers by the July 4th deadline, given the narrow time frame and existing disagreements between the House and Senate versions.

Challenges:

• Time Constraints: With Congress approaching a recess and various events vying for attention, mobilizing the House to vote swiftly on reconciling the bill is highly unlikely.

• Poison Pills: Discrepancies such as the state and local tax deduction (SALT) debate pose significant obstacles, with some House Republicans from high-tax states opposing parts of the Senate version.

Notable Quote:

Alana Shore [07:26]: "The state and local tax deduction debate could really hurt this bill."

---

5. Broader Political Implications and Voter Sentiment

The discussion broadens to examine the waning support for the bill among Republican voters and the internal discord within the party.

Insights:

• Voter Opposition: Polls indicate that many Republican voters are not in favor of the bill, challenging its viability despite strong backing from the party establishment.

• Party Infighting: Prominent Republicans, including Josh Hawley, have publicly criticized aspects of the bill, such as Medicaid cuts paired with corporate tax breaks, signaling deeper ideological rifts.

Notable Quote:

Alana Shore [10:25]: "This is not to pick on Josh Hawley. I think that's how a lot of Republicans are thinking like realizing in real time this is going to be pretty hard to sell."

---

6. Additional Political Developments

Beyond the primary focus on the Big Beautiful Bill, the episode touches upon other significant political events:

a. Trump's TikTok Negotiations:

• President Trump has indicated progress in finding a buyer for TikTok, anticipating Chinese approval within two weeks ([14:44]).

b. Israeli Politics and Netanyahu's Trial:

• President Trump has exerted pressure on Israeli officials to halt Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial, citing national security and diplomatic concerns ([16:25]).
• Netanyahu's trial, ongoing since 2019 on charges of bribery, fraud, and breach of trust, has been a contentious issue, with Trump advocating for its cancellation to facilitate negotiations with Hamas and Iran.

c. U.S. Supreme Court Decisions:

• The Supreme Court released five new decisions, including one limiting lower courts' ability to issue nationwide injunctions against executive orders ([17:11]).
• A notable case upheld Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship, with a 6-3 ruling, prompting immediate legal challenges from immigrant rights advocates.

---

7. Public Safety Concerns: Impersonation of ICE Agents

The episode shifts to a critical issue concerning public safety and the rise of individuals impersonating Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.

Reports:

• Multiple incidents across states like Pennsylvania, California, North Carolina, and South Carolina involve individuals posing as ICE agents to commit crimes ranging from robbery to sexual assault.

• California Attorney General Rob Bonta has issued warnings about such impersonations, emphasizing the dangers they pose to both the public and legitimate ICE officers.

Notable Quote:

Michigan Senator Gary Peters [24:00]: "People think, here's a person coming up to me, not identified, covering themselves. They're kidnapping. They'll probably fight back. That endangers the officer as well."

---

8. Conclusion and Production Credits

Jane Coaston wraps up the episode by summarizing the discussed topics and acknowledging the production team behind What A Day. While the podcast includes advertisements and sponsor messages, the summary here focuses solely on the substantive content discussed during the episode.

---

Final Thoughts:

This episode of What A Day provides a comprehensive analysis of the internal and external challenges faced by Republicans in passing President Trump's substantial legislative proposal. Through insightful interviews and detailed discussions, listeners gain a nuanced understanding of the political maneuvering, fiscal implications, and broader societal impacts tied to the Big Beautiful Bill. Additionally, the episode sheds light on other significant political events and public safety issues, offering a well-rounded perspective on the current political landscape.

Transcript

[Jane Coston]

It's Monday, June 30th. I'm Jane Coston and this is Wetaday, the show that celebrates LeBron James deciding to play a record 23rd NBA season. LeBron will not just be the oldest active player at 41 years old. There are dozens of NBA players who will be playing James this season who were not born when he entered the NBA. On today's show, President Donald Trump hints at a possible TikTok buyer. And Trump pressures Israeli officials officials to drop Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial. But let's start with the Republican big, not very beautiful bill, which President Trump wants on his desk by July 4th, as in this Friday. And like with any group assignment, getting this absolute shit show of a bill across the finish line will take a lot of teamwork from people who are not very, let's say, teamwork inclined and the group project itself, it sucks. If passed, the big beautiful bill would greenlight the single biggest cut to America's social safety net in decades. Under the Senate version, more than 11 million people could end up without health care coverage over the next decade. That's according to the latest projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. And millions of people could lose access to food assistance, mainly to keep funding giant tax cuts passed during Trump's first term. Immigration and Customs Enforcement would get a multi billion dollar budget bump. Oh, and the bill is projected to add trillions of dollars to the national debt, a fact which Washington Democratic Senator Patty Murray made sure to highlight on the Senate floor Sunday.

[Patty Murray]

Have you no shame if you think you can look the American people in the face and tell them we have to bring down the debt after passing what might be the most expensive bill in history? If you think you can do that and then be taken seriously, well, you know what? If you believe that, maybe you are foolish enough to think that zero and a trillion are the same.

[Jane Coston]

So for more on the latest with the Republicans big, beautiful disaster of a bill, I spoke with Alana Shore. She's a senior Washington editor for the online news publication Semaphore. Alana, welcome to what a day.

[Alana Shore]

Glad to be here.

[Jane Coston]

So I want to be clear. We are taping this interview Sunday afternoon, but everything's moving very fast. So things may have changed by the time people hear our conversation. But I guess to start, can you tell us about the major differences between the Senate bill that is being debated right now and the version that passed in the House last month?

[Alana Shore]

Well, the biggest difference is on Medicaid, there are much, much steeper cuts to the program under this bill. And in fact, Senate Republicans are still debating whether they even work with me here wanna go through with these steep cuts that they're proposing. They're openly talking about delaying them just as they're about to vote to put them into effect because they know how contentious these cut. So Medicaid's the big one. Also, on clean energy credits, not only do they phase out these credits a lot faster than the House, which is something that obviously Democrats hate and even Republican moderates don't like, they also slap new tax on wind and solar. This is a hit so big to the clean energy industry that Elon Musk is out there again saying, don't pass this bill. It'll decimate clean energy manufacturing in America. There's other stuff, but those are the two biggest.

[Jane Coston]

So the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released its cost estimate of the Senate bill and it says it will add more than $3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Nearly 12 million Americans would lose their health care, too. How could that complicate the final passage, especially given the fiscal hawks in both the Senate and in the House?

[Alana Shore]

So it could, but it also couldn't. Let me explain how it could. Namely, you know, that's a huge deficit number. The White House kind of waves its hands on that math and says, well, these projections don't. They don't factor in all the growth that's going to result. They're overly doom, saying, and to be sure, sometimes these projections are a little bit off. But the real rub is, will the fiscal hawks stick to their guns and say, I want more deficit reduction, which is what they proclaim before I'm going to vote for this. They don't have a habit of sticking to that. I mean, in fact, as we've seen throughout this Congress, very few Republicans have a habit of sticking to their hesitance and reluctance when Trump and the White House, you know, really put the pressure on.

[Jane Coston]

Yeah, I think, you know, we've seen some of the hawks like Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ron Johnson try to hold out their vote on even starting a debate. And Johnson and Lee caved. Paul didn't. But I am curious as to another senator that we've been keeping an eye on, which is Alaska's Lisa Murkowski. Over the last few days, Republicans have added a ton of provisions to the bill specifically to get her support, which I'm kind of entertained by everything from waivers to exempt Alaskans from work requirements for food aid to a tax write off for whaling captains. And she still seems reluctant to move the bill forward. Which like the whaling captains. Lisa, where does she stand right now?

[Alana Shore]

I know think of the whaling captains.

[Jane Coston]

The whaling captains literally as we speak.

[Unknown]

Right.

[Alana Shore]

With the ultimate fate of the bill somewhat, but not totally up in the air. Republicans are preparing to argue before the Senate parliamentarian. And I know I'm getting wonky again, but I'm sure you've talked about this figure. Nonpartisan referee has also dealt a lot of blows to Democrats in the past on stuff like the minimum wage. She's known to be equal opportunity in what she pushes out of these bills. And the big question is whether she lets some of these Alaskan carve outs stay intact or whether she rules. This is too obvious a carve out for Murkowski. State doesn't have a meaningful effect on the budget. It can be filibustered out of there. So I would say right now Murkowski voted to start debate. If a lot of these carve outs, I don't want to say giveaways to her state stay, she's likely to keep voting yes. But it really depends on how those rulings go.

[Jane Coston]

Now amidst all of this, North Carolina's Thom Tillis announced that he won't be seeking reelection next year, which I think we kind of knew a couple of years ago. But he's been opposed to this bill, saying it's bad for a state. And in his announcement on Sunday, he had some pointed criticism for his colleagues. Quote, too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who don't really give a damn about the people they promise to represent on the campaign trail. How is that reverberating in Congress, as you say?

[Alana Shore]

I don't think it's a particular shock. Even before this, Tillis really didn't want to vote yes on Pete Hegseth. He was going around strongly signaling that I don't think this guy is worthy to lead the Pentagon and then just kind of folded amid some really fierce pressure from this White House. So he was on retirement watch for a bit this year. I think this will reverberate, though, just because he was so blunt in his statement. He also said he's looking forward to calling balls and strikes, you know, as he sees fit, which is essentially in Senate speak, saying, I'm now going to speak my mind and look out Republicans. I may or may not keep voting the way you want me to vote.

[Jane Coston]

Now, though, this is only entertaining to me. Should the Senate ultimately pass this bill, it has to go back to the House to approve any changes made. And we've heard A lot from various members of the House saying, for example, the stipulations with AI saying like, oh, I didn't even know that was there and I hate it and I'm mad all the time. So there's been a lot of differences between the House and the Senate, even among fiscal hawks, even among the people who should be the most supportive of this bill. So what are the potential poison pills that could doom its chances there? Because the House version originally passed by a single vote.

[Alana Shore]

Certainly salt, or I should say that the state and local tax deduction debate could really hurt this salt. It's blue state Republicans, mostly New York and California, high tax regions where they want to eliminate this cap on the deductions. Again, super wonky here, but this is something Trump has very frequently said, like, I'm going to help you out with and then just not for what, as.

[Jane Coston]

Far as I can tell, this is why Mike Lawlor talks about anything, is talking about salts.

[Alana Shore]

And Mike Lawler, let's not forget, really wants to be governor, is kind of digging in here, but also saying that he's maybe going to cave and support the compromise that senators in the White House worked out, which is just plain not as good for these blue state Republicans as what the House agreed to. Another New York Republican, less talkative, Nick lalota, he's already said I'm a no, right? So that's not good. We at Semaphore actually, though, cornered Warren Davidson, who voted no along with Thomas Massie the first time, and he says he likes these steeper Medicaid cuts, so he might be back in play for yes. So it's like, you know, Jenga math, right? Like you take out one definite yes, put in this. So this is Mike Johnson right now trying to hope his vote count doesn't collapse on him.

[Jane Coston]

Well, there's also California's David Valada, who has voiced concern about the Medicaid cuts in the way you voice concern about things.

[Alana Shore]

Yeah, that's a good point. I didn't mention that because, again, I'm just deeply skeptical at this point that the Medicaid cuts, given that the House was already cutting Medicaid by quite a bit other than Tillis, who was in a very specific position trying to get reelection in a state where legislators were on record saying this is going to be a problem. Trade associations. I'm less certain Valadea will actually follow through with that.

[Jane Coston]

Now, here's a basic question for you. Is the House in town? Can this really get done by the holiday, which is Friday, as in this Friday.

[Alana Shore]

Correct. I mean, so as your listeners may know, whenever there's a congressional recess, you know, some of these guys go home and hang out with their families, but a lot of them go on codels, Congressional delegations to, you know, international locations. There's a lot of plans, not to mention holiday parades and constituent events that are getting canceled and rejiggered right now. And that could be even bigger of an issue in the House because we're bumping right up until July 4th to potentially pass this thing. House Speaker Mike Johnson has said, I'll give my members notice, probably around 48 hours for them to get back to Washington and vote on this. But that gives them a super, super narrow window, like between maybe Wednesday morning and Thursday afternoon to get this all done. And anybody who watches Congress knows the House has trouble moving that fast on anything.

[Jane Coston]

Now, I realize Republicans don't have huge margins in either chamber, and they are trying to satisfy wings of their caucus that have exactly opposing interests and seem to hate each other. But what do you think? It says that so many Republicans seem so reluctant to pass this bill, polling shows voters aren't on board with it. And it seems like the only thing keeping it alive is the threat of the president calling you and yelling at you.

[Alana Shore]

This bill has had a super interesting history, right? I mean, keep in mind in 2017 when Republicans used the same filibuster protections to pass the first Trump tax cuts that they're now trying to extend. The House and Senate were in agreement and totally had a plan, basically by New Year's, right, as the Congress was starting. And this time they've squabbled. They fought. Should we do one bill or two? It was being dragged down well into the spring, right. So there was never the chance for them to kind of sing Kumbaya, to use the cliche, and get excited about doing something along party lines. And you've seen that, right? There's been this level of like, just malcontent with the process that I think now is spilling into the policy as you're seeing more and more Republicans come out and criticize more and more things. I mean, you have Josh Hawley come out this weekend and say on camera, I don't think we should be cutting health care for working people while giving corporate tax breaks. He fully plans to do that. Like he said, I don't think we should be doing the thing that I'm about to vote for. And this is not to pick on Josh Hawley. I think that's how a lot of Republicans are thinking like realizing in real time this is going to be pretty hard to sell. Because on paper, yes, preventing a tax increase is part of Republican ideology forever. Yes, that's sellable. But there's so much other stuff in here, from the Medicaid cuts to AI. Not to mention a lot of these guys have never voted to increase the debt ceiling. We're talking trillions of debt that they're voting for the first time in their careers. Of course they're not going to like it.

[Jane Coston]

Alana, thank you so much for joining us.

[Alana Shore]

Thanks for having me.

[Jane Coston]

That was my conversation with Alana Shore, Senior Washington Editor for Semaphore. We'll link to her work in our show Notes. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe. Leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube and share with your friends. More to come after some ads Water Day is brought to you by Nutrafol. Hot days, humid nights and non stop plans. All that heat can increase hair shedding. While a packed schedule can add stress which can impact your hair. Nutrafol's whole body approach and clinically tested formula support your hair from within so you can focus on living your best life all summer long. Nutrafol is the 1 dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand trusted by over 1 1/2 million people. Anything truly worthwhile takes time and effort and with Nutrafol see thicker, stronger, faster growing hair and less shedding in to six months. Everyone's root causes of hair thinning are different, so a one size fits all approach to hair growth doesn't cut it. Nutrafol has multiple formulas designed to give your body what it needs to grow and support your hair's unique needs. Whether you're navigating postpartum menopause, a plant based lifestyle, or simply looking to see less hair shedding, Nutrafol has you covered. And while many supplements rely solely on ingredient studies, Nutrafol clinically tests final formulations to ensure their efficacy. In a clinical study, 90% of women saw overall improvement in their hair after taking Nutrafol. Women Hair Growth Supplement six months this summer. Stop worrying about your hair and start making memories for a limited time. Nutrafol is offering our listeners $10 off your first month subscription and free shipping when you go to nutrafol.com and enter promo code day. Find out why Nutrafol is the best selling hair growth supplement [e-mail] spelled n u t r-a f o l.com promo code day. That's NutraFool.com promo code day.

[Maria Bartiromo]

Amazon Pharmacy Presents Painful Thoughts I read.

[Unknown]

Somewhere that the average American spends 13 hours a year waiting in pharmacies for prescriptions. Clearly I am above average. I thought being above average would feel better. Maybe I'll read some greeting cards next time.

[Maria Bartiromo]

Use Amazon Pharmacy. We deliver. And here's to being anything but average. Amazon Pharmacy Healthcare just got less painful.

[Unknown]

USAA knows dynamic duos can save the day like superheroes and sidekicks or auto and home insurance. With usaa, you can bundle your auto and home and save up to 10%. Tap the banner to learn more and get a'@usaa.com bundle restrictions apply.

[Jane Coston]

Here are some stories you may have missed over the weekend.

[Alana Shore]

Header lines.

[Donald Trump]

We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need probably China approval and I think President Xi will probably do it. I'll tell you in about two weeks. A big technology company there, very, very wealthy people. It's a group of very wealthy people.

[Jane Coston]

Two weeks. It's always two weeks. President Trump appears pretty confident that he has a solution for his TikTok problem. The Chinese owned app has been facing the possibility of a ban in the US over national security concern concerns, leaving its fate for American users up in the air. Trump has extended the deadline three times since he took office in January. Trump hinted at the possible deal in an interview with Fox News Sunday Morning Futures. It was taped Friday and broadcast Sunday. Trump discussed a slew of other topics with host Maria Bartiromo. Here's what he said when she asked about his 90 day tariff pause on most countries, which is set to come to an end next week.

[Donald Trump]

We made a deal pretty much with India, we made a deal with China, we made a deal with uk. Great people who made deals, but I'd rather just send them a letter, a very fair letter, saying congratulations, we're going to allow you to trade in the United States of America. You're going to pay a 25% tariff or 20% or 40 or 50%. I would rather do that.

[Jane Coston]

When Bartiromo asked if he would extend the pause, the president said he doesn't think he'll need to, but he could. And of course Trump rambled about the obliteration of Iran's nuclear sites.

[Donald Trump]

And they did obliterate it. It turned out then we had to suffer the fake news where the fake news and CNN and the New York Times was saying, well, maybe it wasn't as good as Trump said. Maybe it wasn't totally obliterated, but it was destroyed, but not, you know, just horrible.

[Jane Coston]

Trump also suggested consequences for whoever leaked the preliminary intelligence assessment last week that suggested Iran's nuclear program was only set back a few months by the US Strikes. You tweeted the Democrats leaked an intelligence.

[Donald Trump]

They should be prosecuted. Who specifically do I know? People that you'd be able to find out. You could find out if they wanted. They could find out easily. You go up and tell the reporter national security who gave it. You have to do that. And I suspect we'll be doing things like that.

[Jane Coston]

We'll be doing things like that, sure, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said of Iran's nuclear sites in an interview that aired on CBS Sunday. Quote, it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage.

[Donald Trump]

I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we've seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers.

[Jane Coston]

It's not a historic mandate, and it wasn't record numbers, but okay. On Friday, the United States Supreme Court released five new decisions, including one that limited the ability of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against executive orders. The specific issue the case addressed was President Trump's attacks on birthright citizenship. In late January, Trump issued an executive order that sought to deny automatic citizenship to the future children of undocumented immigrants and those with temporary legal status. Birthright citizenship has been upheld for 125 years under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Constitution the Supreme Court's 6:3 ruling rejected the validity of injunctions filed by state judges against that particular order, meaning that it will now move forward in most states. The ruling did not, however, address the constitutionality of Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship. The decision fell along ideological lines, with Justices Sonia Cetomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting. Just hours after the opinion was released, a group of immigrants rights advocates filed a class action lawsuit challenging Trump. Trump's executive Order On Sunday, the Jerusalem District Court canceled this week's upcoming hearings in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial. Netanyahu requested the cancellation, citing classified diplomatic and security reasons. Notably, though, the change came a day after President Trump wrote on Truth Social that Netanyahu's trial could interfere with his current negotiations with Hamas and Iran. Trump implicitly leaned on Israel and his message, noting that the US Spends billions of dollars every year in aid to Israel. It was Trump's second post in three days about Netanyahu's trial. His earlier post on Thursday also called for Israel to cancel the proceedings. Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust, which he has denied. His trial has been ongoing for the last five years. Trump has repeatedly called for Israel and Hamas to end the war in Gaza and told reporters last Friday that he thought a deal for a ceasefire could be reached within a week. Trump posted again on Truth Social early Sunday morning, writing simply, quote, make the deal in Gaza. Get the hostages back. More than 100,000 people marched in a Budapest pride parade on Saturday, just one day after Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban warned people to speak. Steer clear of the banned parade. In March, Orban's party passed legislation barring pride events and allowing the use of facial recognition to identify attendees. Potential participants were threatened with fines of up to US$600. But Budapest's liberal mayor tried to facilitate a workaround, renaming the event Budapest Pride Freedom and recasting it as a commemoration of Soviet troops pulling out of the city in 1991. Even after police banned that event, a record breaking number of people showed up to the parade. The impressive turnout is already being called a political turning point for Orban's conservative Christian government. The overwhelming display of opposition to his policies comes as Orban faces an unprecedented threat in next year's election from his political rival, Peter Modyar. On Sunday, Orban called the event repulsive and shameful. Good luck next year, buddy. And that's the news. One more thing. Let's try something. Let's say you're at work, you're a dishwasher at a nice restaurant, and it's about halfway through your shift. Suddenly a man walks into the kitchen claiming to be from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He's wearing a balaclava, a face mask that only shows your eyes and mouth, and he's carrying a gun. Let's say you're a legal resident of the United States, but some of your colleagues aren't. You're probably scared. You're probably wondering what to do. And you may be wondering, what if this person isn't from ice. As ICE raids continue to take place at businesses and homes and farms across the country, we are seeing a rise of ordinary people pretending to be immigration officers in order to do, well, who the hell knows what. In Philadelphia, a man was arrested two weeks ago after he allegedly impersonated an ICE agent in order to rob a business. Here's a local ABC affiliate Captain Jack.

[Captain Ryan]

Ryan says The suspect, who was wearing a makeshift law enforcement outfit, presented himself as an agent from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, commonly referred to as ice.

[Unknown]

He yelled, immigration. Some of the employees promptly left the business. He zip tied the female that was present behind the counter.

[Captain Ryan]

Captain Ryan says the whole thing lasted no more than 30 seconds, with the suspect making away with approximately $1,000 in cash before driving away in this white van.

[Jane Coston]

And in Huntington Park, California, a man is now in custody after police say he was spotted in a vehicle meant to look like it belonged to law enforcement. Here's the local CW affiliate. They say the suspects, Dodge Durango, had law enforcement type lights and inside copies of passports, Federal enforcement style documents, cell phones, and a loaded firearm.

[Unknown]

What this individual was doing with those items remains under investigation.

[Donald Trump]

But the presence of law enforcement style.

[Unknown]

Equipment without any verified authority raises serious concerns.

[Jane Coston]

In North Carolina, a man allegedly impersonated an ICE agent in order to sexually assault a woman back in late January, reportedly telling her he'd deport her if she didn't have sex with him. In South Carolina, a man allegedly detained a group of Latino men in a fake traffic stop in February of this year, taking the keys to their car and saying, quote, you all got caught. You're going back to Mexico. Back in March, California Attorney General Rob Bonta even issued a warning against fake ICE officers, saying, quote, we have received reports of individuals looking to take advantage of the fear and uncertainty created by President Trump's inhumane mass deportation policies. Let me be clear. If you seek to scam or otherwise take advantage of California's immigrant communities, you will be held accountable. He's right. Because these individuals are taking advantage of President Trump's mass deportation policies, specifically the policy of ICE officers not wearing anything to indicate that they're federal law enforcement agents. Instead, as we've seen over and over again over the last few months, ICE officers are often wearing plain clothes and with no visible identification. So if you're at work or at home and someone shows up wearing a face mask and a sweatshirt and claiming to be a federal law enforcement agent, and how exactly do you know they are or aren't? You don't. And how could you? As Michigan Democratic Senator Gary Peters pointed out last week to Attorney General Pam Bondi, letting ICE officers operate with no visible indication, they're not just terrifying guys trying to hurt you for no reason isn't just bad for ordinary citizens. It's dangerous for ICE officers, too.

[Unknown]

People think, here's a person coming up to me, not identified, covering themselves. They're kidnapping. They'll probably fight back. That endangers the officer as well. And that's a serious situation. People need to know that they're dealing with a federal law enforcement official.

[Jane Coston]

Now, Bondi claimed to have just now learned about ICE officers using face masks, which I 100% do not believe. What do I believe? That ICE trying to conceal their identities is putting everyday people at risk, even those who will never actually encounter federal immigration enforcement but might encounter someone trying to commit a crime while acting like federal immigration enforcement? Before we go, the Supreme Court's conservative supermajority just paved the way for Red states to defund Planned Parenthood. Their decision undermines access to abortions, cancer screenings and all reproductive health care for millions and millions of people on Medicaid across the country. Our friends at votesave America have a fund to support impacted Planned Parenthoods and patients. Head to votesaveamerica.com support to learn more now paid for by VoteSave America. You can learn more at votesaveamerica.com this ad has not been authorized by any candidate or candidates committee. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review. Do not tell me what a Labubu is and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading and not just about how seriously they are Beanie Babies, but for Generation Alpha. And that's all the information I'm going to hold in my brain about them. Like me, what a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and [e-mail] subscribe hi, I'm Jane Coston and they are Beanie Babies for people who do not know who Princess Diana was. And that is my final answer. What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producer is Emily Foer. Our producer is Michelle Aloy. Our video editor is Joseph Dutra. Our video producer is Johanna Case. We had production help today from Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Sean Ali, Tyler Hill and Laura Newcombe. Our senior producer is Erika Morrison and our senior vice president of news and politics is Adrienne Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America.

[Alana Shore]

Easy.

[Maria Bartiromo]

Amazon One Medical presents Painful Thoughts.

[Unknown]

I've been on hold to make a doctor's appointment for 23 minutes now. The automated voice has told me 47 times that my call is very important to them. I'm starting to think that they don't think my call is important at all.

[Maria Bartiromo]

With Amazon One Medical 247 Virtual Care. You'll get help fast without having to remain on the line to make an appointment. Amazon one Medical healthcare just got less painful.

[Ashley Flowers]

Hi, I'm Ashley Flowers, creator and host of the number one true crime podcast, Crime Junkie. Every Monday, me and my best friend Britt break down a new case, but not in the way you've heard before, and not the cases you've heard before. You'll hear stories on Crime Junkie that haven't been told anywhere else. I'll tell you what you can do to help victims and their families get justice. Join us for new episodes of Crime Junkie every Monday. Already waiting for you by searching for Crime Junkie. Wherever you listen to podcasts.