Trump Sows Chaos Abroad

Summary

Podcast Summary: What A Day – Trump Sows Chaos Abroad
Host: Jane Coston
Release Date: March 19, 2025
Duration: Approximately 25 minutes

---

Foreign Policy Turmoil: Trump's Engagements and Their Implications

Trump-Putin Ceasefire Call:

The episode opens with a deep dive into President Donald Trump's recent phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Their discussion centered around a proposed ceasefire to end Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine, specifically targeting the halt of attacks on energy infrastructure. According to a Kremlin-released summary, Putin responded positively to the initiative, and the Russian military received corresponding orders. However, despite these high-level talks, the ground reality remains unchanged, with reports indicating continued Russian assaults on Ukrainian cities.

Notable Quote:

• Jane Coston [01:40]: "There's no American involved. There could be if you end up in World War 3 over this, which is so ridiculous."

Trump's Public Statements:

Post-call, Trump appeared on Fox News to discuss the conversations, emphasizing the desire to swiftly end the conflict without American casualties. He touted the lengthy nature of the call and portrayed it as a step toward peace.

Israel-Gaza Escalation:

The podcast also covers Israel's significant military actions against Gaza, which resulted in over 400 Palestinian fatalities. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified the strikes as a response to Hamas's refusal to release more Israeli hostages in exchange for extending the ceasefire. Netanyahu emphasized that Israel had refrained from military actions, hoping Hamas would alter its stance, but ultimately, they did not comply.

Notable Quote:

• Benjamin Netanyahu [02:40]: "This is why I authorized yesterday the renewal of military action against Hamas."

U.S. Strikes on Houthi Militants:

Adding to the global tensions, the U.S. launched airstrikes against Houthi militants in Yemen, further complicating international relations. Trump linked these actions to broader regional conflicts, threatening increased tensions with Iran, the primary backer of the Houthi rebels.

Expert Analysis with Tommy Vitor

Ceasefire Breakdown in Gaza:

Jane Coston converses with Tommy Vitor, co-host of Pod Save the World, to unpack the failure of the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Vitor explains that while initial phases aimed at releasing hostages saw agreement, deeper negotiations faltered due to Israel's intent to eradicate Hamas and Hamas's demand for a permanent end to Israeli military presence in Gaza.

Notable Quote:

• Tommy Vitor [03:59]: "Netanyahu's right flank and his political coalition wants to continue the fighting in Gaza until Hamas is basically eradicated."

Trump's Role and Potential Downsides:

Vitor critiques Trump's handling of the situation, suggesting that his administration's heavy military support for Israel has inadvertently sustained the conflict. He raises concerns about Trump's statements threatening Iran over Houthi attacks, highlighting the complexities and dangers of conflating proxy actions with state responsibility.

Quote:

• Tommy Vitor [06:30]: "Trump is now in kind of a challenging political spot."

Trump-Putin Ceasefire Agreement:

The conversation shifts to the implications of Trump's ceasefire deal with Putin, which appears ineffective given ongoing drone attacks in Ukraine. Vitor portrays the agreement as minimal, with Putin not committing to a comprehensive ceasefire but only promising to protect energy infrastructure.

Notable Quote:

• Tommy Vitor [08:30]: "Max Seddon...putin didn't really back away from any of his maximalist positions."

Recognition of Crimea:

The discussion touches upon the U.S. administration's contemplation of recognizing Crimea as Russian territory, a move that would have significant geopolitical repercussions. Vitor criticizes this potential concession as undermining Ukraine's sovereignty and weakening the U.S.'s negotiating position.

Quote:

• Tommy Vitor [11:20]: "It just seems like we're giving up all our negotiating positions."

Judiciary Conflicts: Trump vs. Supreme Court

The episode transitions to domestic issues, focusing on President Trump's public calls to impeach federal judges. Following Trump's accusations against judiciary members for perceived bias and misconduct, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts publicly rebukes these calls. Roberts emphasized that impeachment is not a suitable response to disagreements over judicial decisions, maintaining the integrity of the judiciary.

Notable Quote:

• Chief Justice John Roberts [15:30]: "For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision."

House Actions:

Despite the Chief Justice's stance, Republican Representative Brandon Gill introduces articles of impeachment against a judge who attempted to halt the administration's deportation flights, arguing that the judge compromised judicial impartiality and created a constitutional crisis.

U.S. Agency Shutdown and Elon Musk

A federal judge orders the Trump administration to reinstate electronic systems at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and halt efforts to close the agency, deeming the shutdown unconstitutional. The ruling also mandates Elon Musk to allow USAID to return to its D.C. headquarters. This legal battle underscores the administration's broader agenda to downsize federal agencies.

Space Exploration Update: NASA Astronauts Return Safely

In a positive note, the podcast covers the safe return of NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams after a prolonged mission aboard the International Space Station. Their return was delayed due to a malfunctioning SpaceX Starliner spacecraft, highlighting both the challenges and triumphs in modern space exploration.

Project 2025: A Blueprint in Action

Background:

Project 2025, a comprehensive plan by the Heritage Foundation, outlines an aggressive agenda for a potential Trump administration, aiming to reshape the federal government extensively.

Current Developments:

Despite initial denials from Trump regarding any association with Project 2025, the podcast illustrates how Trump's actions align closely with the project's objectives. Senator Raphael Warnock accuses Trump of enacting Project 2025's vision through policies dismantling the Department of Education and expanding presidential powers.

Notable Quote:

• Raphael Warnock [20:41]: "These are the terms and conditions of a second Trump presidency. You vote for him, you vote for all of this."

Conclusion:

Tommy Vitor emphasizes the effective implementation of Project 2025 despite its unpopularity, suggesting that Trump's administration is executing the strategy beyond expectations set by its architects.

Final Thoughts and Takeaways

Jane Coston concludes the episode by reflecting on the chaotic international stance fostered by Trump's policies, the strained U.S. judiciary, and the ongoing implementation of conservative agendas through Project 2025. She underscores the importance of critically assessing presidential statements and actions, especially when they diverge from factual accuracy.

Key Takeaways:

• Trump's foreign policy engagements have deepened global conflicts without delivering substantive peace.
• Domestic tensions are escalating as the administration challenges judicial independence.
• Project 2025 serves as a strategic blueprint that is actively shaping government policies, despite denials from key figures.
• The return of NASA astronauts marks a significant, positive milestone amidst broader geopolitical instability.

---

Notable Quotes from the Episode:

1. Jane Coston [00:02]: "It's Wednesday, March 19th...without a lot of the usual hype and fake outrage."
2. Maria Bartiromo [00:13]: "We're not sure where this is going."
3. Jane Coston [01:40]: "There's no American involved...allocating energy."

---

Further Resources:

• Subscribe to What A Day: Available on all major podcast platforms and YouTube.
• Support Independent Bookstores: Visit bookshop.org and use code WAD for a discount.
• Stay Informed: Subscribe to the What A Day nightly newsletter for more updates.

---

This summary encapsulates the key discussions, insights, and conclusions from the What A Day episode titled "Trump Sows Chaos Abroad." For a comprehensive understanding, listening to the full episode is recommended.

Transcript

[Jane Coston]

It's Wednesday, March 19th. I'm Jane Coston, and this is Whataday, the show that agrees with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo here talking about tariffs for, like, the first time ever.

[Maria Bartiromo]

See, these are the things that people are really worried about because they first thought it was just about trade, then they thought it was just about fentanyl. Then after that, we talked about, well, maybe it's currency manipulation and maybe it's now you're talking about food testing. And when I bring up the issue of clarity, that's, that's what I'm talking about and that's what I'm hearing from corporate America, that we're not sure where this is going.

[Jane Coston]

I also do not know where this is going. Not just tariffs, like any of it. On today's show, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts rebukes President Donald Trump over his calls to impeach federal judges and the stranded US Astronauts return to Earth. But let's start with foreign policy news because, woo, boy, there's a lot of it. On Tuesday, President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held a phone call to talk about a ceasefire deal to end Russia's war on Ukraine and the potential for a Russia US Hockey series. Because, sure, during the call, Trump proposed that both Russia and Ukraine refrain from attacking, quote, energy infrastructure facilities. And Putin, according to a Kremlin readout of the conversation, seemed to be kind of into the idea. Quote, Vladimir Putin responded positively to this initiative and immediately gave the Russian military the corresponding order. And Trump responded positively to all the attention. The call got him, too. He went on Fox News Tuesday night to talk about it.

[Donald Trump]

And we want to get it over with. Look, we're doing this. There are no Americans involved. There could be if you end up in World War 3 over this, which is so ridiculous. But, you know, strange things happen. And I think we had a great call, it lasted almost two hours, talked about a lot of things and toward getting it to peace.

[Jane Coston]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky responded by saying that he was, quote, ready to discuss next steps with Trump. But Ukraine needs to hear more details. And multiple reports indicated that Russia has continued to attack Kyiv and other cities in Ukraine on Tuesday. So as far as I can tell, nothing has changed. Also on Tuesday, Israel launched a massive attack on Gaza. Palestinian officials say the strikes killed more than 400 people. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the strikes were in response to Hamas refusing to free more Israeli hostages in exchange for extending the ceasefire. To be clear, that was not part of the original ceasefire agreement. But Netanyahu said he has Trump's full support for the strikes.

[Benjamin Netanyahu]

In the past two weeks, Israel did not initiate any military action in the hope that Hamas would change course. While that didn't happen, while Israel accepted the offer of President Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, Hamas flatly refused to do so. This is why I authorized yesterday the renewal of military action against Hamas.

[Jane Coston]

So to get into Russia, Israel, and also the US Attacks on Houthi militants in Yemen, too, I sat down with Crooked Media's own Tommy Vitor, crowd co host of Pod Save the World. Tommy, thanks for being here.

[Tommy Vitor]

Thanks for having me.

[Jane Coston]

So let's start with Israel's attack on Gaza Monday night, local time. Does this mean the ceasefire has failed?

[Tommy Vitor]

It sounds like it, at least for now. I mean, the Israelis say they're resuming bombing because Hamas was basically intransigent in the talks. Though I do think it's worth noting that Hamas's position was they wanted to continue to phase two of the ceasefire agreement that everyone had signed, which would lead to a permanent end to the war, and Israel seemed to want to extend it for another seven weeks or so to get more hostages out, and they just couldn't find common ground.

[Jane Coston]

Yeah, let's get into that a little bit. What do we know about why those talks broke down between Hamas and the Israeli government? Because it sounds like serious talks about the second phase of the deal, which we kept hearing about, never really materialized.

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, I mean, there was this phase one, which was a ceasefire for the release of Israeli hostages being held by Hamas and then Palestinian prisoners being held by the Israelis. Everyone could agree that they wanted that part to happen, but the Israelis don't want the war to be over. Netanyahu's right flank and his political coalition wants to continue the fighting in Gaza until Hamas is basically eradicated. And Hamas wants to get to a place where the IDF is permanently out of the Gaza Strip, and they just couldn't find common ground there.

[Jane Coston]

Right. And Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tuesday that any future negotiations with Hamas would happen in tandem with. With Israeli military action in Gaza, which seems to me kind of like Netanyahu is trying to have his cake and eat it, too.

[Tommy Vitor]

Yes, I mean, that's sort of.

[Jane Coston]

He's basically saying, like, resuming active fighting while saying the ceasefire is still on the table. What's your read on his actions here?

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, and he also, I think, wants Hamas essentially to dismantle itself and give up and no longer have any civilian control in Gaza or a military wing, which is an understandable position from a country attacked on October 7th, but it's also understandable that Hamas would view that as a non startup.

[Jane Coston]

Yeah, that doesn't seem at all realistic. Where does this leave Trump? Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said that Israel had consulted with the administration before launching Monday's attack. And Trump has shown a lot of deference to the Israelis, even floating that absurd plan where the US Takes over Gaza, kicks the Palestinians out and turns it into, I don't know, real estate. So basically he's tied into this. He is in this. And so where, where does that leave him?

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, I mean, I'm pulling this from memory, but I think in the last few months the US has given the Israelis like $12 billion worth of weapons. So he has helped Netanyahu rearm and prepare for this continued assault. I think Trump deserved credit for getting the initial ceasefire kind of like over the line and getting it done for the last couple months, but now it seems like he's just gonna fully back the Israelis in whatever they want to do. I mean, unfortunately, I don't really think he cares much about what happens to Gaza now.

[Jane Coston]

The politics for him are not the same as they were for Biden. But what are the downsides for Trump? Because I think you're starting to hear a little bit from the so called kind of foreign policy realists who are opposing his actions here and his actions. And we're going to talk about Iran in a second. But what are some potential downsides here?

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, I mean, Trump's position on the most recent wars, the war in Gaza and the war in Ukraine, is that it never would have happened if he was president. Well, now it's restarting while he was president. The bombing in Gaza. At the same time, the United States just launched a bunch of airstrikes on the Houthi rebels in Yemen. So our anti war president doesn't look quite as anti war at the moment.

[Jane Coston]

Why? I mean, what a wild piece of information.

[Tommy Vitor]

You're shocked, huh?

[Jane Coston]

I'm stunned, yeah. Like Trump also threatened to ramp up tensions with Iran on Tuesday, saying any new strikes from the Houthi militants in Yemen, an Iranian proxy would be seen in the eyes of the administration as a direct attack from Iran. This is the same group the US Launched strikes on over the weekend. We've been talking about this, but are we going to war with Iran?

[Tommy Vitor]

Well, I mean, I think the real danger of that statement from Trump is that the Houthi rebels are armed by Iran and they're supported by Iran, but they are not controlled by Iran, the way you might say Hezbollah is. And so if suddenly we're going to hold Iran accountable for everything they do, that's pretty scary. There's some vast implications. I mean, I think we should take the Houthi rebels at their word, which is they're saying as long as the war in Gaza is going, as long as the Israelis are blockading the Gaza Strip and keeping humanitarian aid out, they're going to fire missiles or drones at ships in the Red Sea. Like, that seems to be the proximate cause that we should be focusing on. I'm not an Iran fan, I'm not a Houthi rebel fan. Houthi rebels are bad dudes. The left should not embrace the Houthi rebels, but that's a recipe for war.

[Jane Coston]

Let's pivot to Russia and Trump's call Tuesday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump had a 90 minute call with Putin on Tuesday where the two ostensibly agreed to a limited 30 day ceasefire on energy and infrastructure targets in Ukraine. As we are speaking, that appears to not be happening based on some information we're seeing about drone attacks in Ukraine. So if this were to happen, would that be a win for Trump?

[Tommy Vitor]

Seems like a pretty limited win, right? I mean, I think what Trump forced the Ukrainians agree to was a 30 day unconditional ceasefire. And now what it sounds like he got out of Putin is a 30 day promise not to bomb energy infrastructure. Not much of a ceasefire in my view. I mean, listen, I like, I hate, I don't want to poo poo diplomacy just because Donald Trump is doing it. Like, I do think it's good that we're talking and maybe we can get to some sort of peace agreement. But Max Seddon, really smart reporter at the ft, went through the Russian language version of the readout of Trump's call and Putin didn't really back away from any of his maximalist positions.

[Jane Coston]

I'm again shocked, right? Shocked, shocked. This plan still needs approval from the Ukrainians, which had already agreed to a broader unconditional ceasefire with Russia, which you mentioned. As of our recording time Tuesday afternoon, they had not responded to the offer. Is it in their interest to take it, given Trump's willingness to throw Ukraine to the wolves in favor of a better relationship with Putin, but also the fact that Putin is a liar.

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, I mean, I think this is. You just got at the enormous challenge for the Ukrainian side. They have no choice but to do whatever Trump says, because if they don't, he has cut off weapons, he's cut off intelligence sharing. He's, you know, just making life as hard as he possibly can for the Ukrainian side while seemingly exerting no actual pressure on Vladimir Putin, who, as you pointed out, has broken ceasefire after ceasefire after ceasefire, who is a liar, who invaded Ukraine in the first place. So it's not a good setup.

[Jane Coston]

And this isn't exactly what the Trump administration wanted either. Right. Like, they wanted the unconditional ceasefire they helped broker with Ukraine. That was a deal Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he was taking to the Russians. So where does that leave the U.S.

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, I mean, it's like Trump is now in kind of a challenging political spot. Putin doesn't have to do what he says. Putin loves to give the middle finger to American presidents. I imagine that this call was an hour and a half, in part because of translation, takes a long time. But also Putin loves to just sit there and lecture you about history and NATO aggression. And he goes deep into the history.

[Jane Coston]

Oh, yeah, he's going to be talking about, like, the Muscovite era and how this all goes back to Peter the Great, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, Sweden.

[Tommy Vitor]

That's right. And now Trump, like, he's got to deliver, and it's going to be challenging.

[Jane Coston]

Well, speaking of Putin wanting things that nobody wants him to have, the political news website Semaphore reported Tuesday that the administration is considering recognizing Crimea as Russian territory as part of a future agreement to end the war. This would, of course, be the Ukrainian peninsula that Russia invaded in 2014, an area of the world people have been fighting over for, like, 200 years. Would that be, in your view, a reasonable concession for Ukraine to make?

[Tommy Vitor]

At this point, I feel like there is no outcome that ends with Ukraine controlling Crimea, but to offer that up on the front end when Putin is offered nothing seems, once again to be getting ahead of the negotiations in a way that is really unproductive, Much like when Pete Hegseth went to Brussels and declared that Ukraine would not be a part of NATO and would not get territory back. Like, it just seems like we're giving up all our negotiating positions.

[Jane Coston]

What's Putin's end goal here? I mean, besides to reestablish a weird version of the Soviet Union, slash the Russian territory or something like that?

[Tommy Vitor]

Yeah, it seems like he wants to. I bet he's going to play this out, this process, for as long as humanly possible, knowing that his forces are slowly but steadily taking back territory in the Kursk region, which is that part of Russia that the Ukrainians had occupied, but also just making gains along the eastern edge of the battlefield. So I think he's going to try to put himself in a maximalist negotiating position and try to end with Russia occupying a fifth of Ukraine's territory, maybe more, and with them not having a real military after any peace agreement's over and not being part of NATO and just kind of getting what he wants.

[Jane Coston]

Tommy, as always, thanks for joining me.

[Tommy Vitor]

Thank you for having me.

[Jane Coston]

That was my conversation with Tommy Vitor, co host of Crooked's Pot Save the World. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe. Leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube and share with your friends. More to come after some ads.

[TaxAct]

TaxAct knows filing your taxes can be complicated, and that's why we have live experts to help you with any questions. They can hold your hand through the process, beginning to end, metaphorically, of course. I mean, they can't actually hold your hand in person. I suppose you could hold your computer mouse while you chat with the expert about capital gains or whatever, which is sort of like holding hands. Sorry. Point is, our tax experts can make filing easier. Tax act let's get them over with.

[Rami Malek]

Charlie Heller is the CIA's most brilliant computer analyst whose life is turned upside down when his wife is murdered in a terrorist attack. Wrought with grief, Charlie decides her killers must pay. Without any field experience, Charlie must trek the globe and use his biggest weapon, his his intelligence, to enact his revenge. Because the most unexpected threat is an amateur. Starring Academy Award winner Rami Malek and Academy Award nominee Laurence Fishburne. The Amateur rated PG13 only in theaters on IMAX April 11th.

[Jane Coston]

What a Day is brought to you by Bookshop.org whether you're looking for an incisive history that helps you make sense of this moment, or a novel that sweeps you away from it entirely, or the perfect gift for a loved one, bookshop.org has you covered when you purchase from bookshop.org, you're supporting more than 2,000 local independent bookstores across the country, ensuring that they'll get to continue fostering culture, curiosity and a love of reading for generations to come. And big news. Bookshop.org has launched an ebook app. You can now support local independent bookstores even when you read digitally. Use code WAD to get 10% off your next order at bookshop.org that's code wadookshop.org here's what else we're following today.

[Rami Malek]

Head of lines.

[Jane Coston]

Going forward.

[Donald Trump]

I have judges.

[Maria Bartiromo]

Would you defy a court order?

[Donald Trump]

Because that we all know I never did defy a court order.

[Jane Coston]

And you wouldn't in the future?

[Donald Trump]

No, you can't do that. However, we have bad judges. We have very bad judges. And these are judges that shouldn't be allowed. I think they, I think at a certain point you have to start looking at what do you do when you have a rogue judge. The judge that we're talking about, he's, you look at his other rulings. I mean, rulings unrelated but having to do with me. He's a lunatic.

[Jane Coston]

The girls are fighting. And by girls, I mean our judiciary and executive branches. The Chief justice of the United States Supreme Court issued a public statement Tuesday rejecting calls to impeach federal judges just hours after, you guessed it, President Donald Trump said a federal judge should be impeached. Trump took to social media Tuesday to whine about the judge who issued an order trying to stop the administration's deportation of more than 200 migrants, including alleged Venezuelan gang members. He repeated his complaints later in the day during his Fox News interview. Chief Justice John Roberts issued a statement Tuesday in an apparent rebuke of Trump's calls. He said, quote, for more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose. The statement echoed one Roberts made in 2018 after Trump called a judge who disagreed with him a, quote, obama judge. But even so, one of Trump's minions in the House said he introduced articles of impeachment against the judge Tuesday. Republican Representative Brandon Gill of Texas argued the judge compromised the impartiality of the judiciary and created a constitutional crisis, which he did not do. That judge gave the Trump administration until today to offer up more information about the deportation flights that ended up carrying some migrants to El Salvador over the weekend. Crazy. A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to reinstate email and other electronic Systems at the U.S. agency for International Development, or USAID, and pause efforts to shut the agency down. The judge said that the Department of Government Efficiency's effort to shutter USAID was likely unconstitutional. The ruling also requires billionaire Elon Musk to allow USAID to reoccupy its headquarters in D.C. musk has touted his dismantling of USAID as a victory in his effort to downsize the federal government. But the shuttering of the agency had immediate consequences for folks overseas who rely on agency funded humanitarian aid and Americans who did work for the agency. Musk And Doge officials have a week to submit a written agreement to the court saying they've complied with the ruling. The Trump administration is expected to appeal the decision.

[Tommy Vitor]

I think the president and the secretary.

[Donald Trump]

Have been very clear on this, that.

[Tommy Vitor]

Anybody that says in the Department of.

[Jane Coston]

Defense that diversity is our strength is frankly incorrect. Oh, we know that's what you think. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell. You don't need to remind us. The Pentagon is continuing its purge of Internet pages honoring minority groups following the Trump administration's directive to weed out diversity, equ. Equity and inclusion across the federal government. As of Monday, multiple articles referencing Native American code talkers were gone from some military websites. Axios was the first to report the story. It said several URLs were labeled DEI. In response to the missing pages, Pentagon Press Secretary John Elliott reiterated that DEI is, quote, dead at the Defense Department. But separately, the Pentagon said Monday a page honoring a black Medal of Honor recipient was accidentally taken down. Uh, we've heard that excuse before. The profile dedicated to Army Major General Charles Calvin Rogers, the highest ranking black service member to receive the Medal of Honor, was removed last week. A screenshot by the Internet Archive showed DEI Medal of Honor was inserted into the URL. The Defense Department told NPR in a statement the page had been taken down during an automated process. It has since been restored.

[Tommy Vitor]

And splashdown Crew 9 back on Earth.

[Jane Coston]

Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, the two NASA astronauts who have been stuck in space for nine months, are finally back on Earth. Wilmore and Williams safely splashed down off the coast of Florida Tuesday in a SpaceX capsule. The two launched into space last summer for a mission at the International Space Station. They were only supposed to be up there for about a week, but their spacecraft, the Starliner, malfunctioned. NASA brought the Starliner back to Earth without a crew due to safety concerns. Wilmore and Williams have been up there ever since they began their journey back to Earth on Sunday. Welcome home, Butch and Sunny. Stay a while, please. And that's the news. One more thing. Project 2025. Remember that? Here's the Wall Street Journal explaining it back in July.

[Rami Malek]

This 920 page document would usher in the most conservative executive branch in modern American history, if enacted. It's called Project 2025.

[Jane Coston]

Stewarded by the right wing think tank, the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025 was a detailed to do list for an incoming Trump administration. Think of it like a wish list for right wing groups, conservative organizations and generally the worst dudes, you know. Or as SNL's Kenan Thompson put it at the Democratic National Convention.

[Raphael Warnock]

You know how when you download an app and there are hundreds of pages there that you don't read, it's just the terms and conditions and you just click agree, right? Well, these are the terms and conditions of a second Trump presidency. You vote for him, you vote for all of this.

[Jane Coston]

Another thing about Project 2025, it was broadly unpopular. The guy who directed Project 2025 at the Heritage Foundation, Paul Dance, got pushed out when NBC News polled it alongside a host of other topics. Socialism, capitalism, both the Republican and Democratic campaigns, and Taylor Swift and billionaire Elon Musk. It was less popular than all of that. So Donald Trump denied having absolutely any knowledge of Project 2025 and probably would have denied knowing what the words project and 2025 meant, too, if he could have. Here he is debating Vice President Kamala Harris in September.

[Donald Trump]

I have nothing to do, as you know, and as she knows better than anyone, I have nothing to do with Project 2025. That's out there. I haven't read it. I don't want to read it purposely. I'm not going to read it. This was a group of people that got together, they came up with some ideas, I guess, some good, some bad, but it makes no difference. I have nothing to do. Everybody knows I'm an open book.

[Jane Coston]

And that denial became the story. Case closed. Except for one small, probably unimportant thing. He's doing Project 2025 right now. Here's Georgia Democratic Senator Raphael Warnock on MSNBC.

[Raphael Warnock]

They're trying to reshape government according to the vision of Project 2025, which he denied over and over again. But we are literally seeing it being played out before our very eyes.

[Jane Coston]

The senator is not wrong. From dismantling the Department of Education to increasing the power of the presidency, a ton of what Donald Trump is doing is exactly what Project 2025 prescribed. In fact, Politico spoke with Paul Danz on Sunday, who said that Trump is achieving the aims of Project 2025 to an extent, quote, beyond my wildest dreams, adding, quote, we had hoped those of us who worked putting together Project 2025, that the next conservative president would seize the day. But Trump is seizing every minute of every hour. So, yeah, in short, Project 2025 was real the whole time and it was unpopular. So Trump, who has a complex relationship with truth, said, basically, I don't know anything about it. And a bunch of media outlets and even some liberals apparently went, cool, sounds good. There is a lesson to be learned here. When Donald Trump says something it is perhaps best to think there is a decent chance this is not true, which seems pretty basic to me. And yet, that's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, enjoy reading the declassified JFK files, and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading not just about how, remember the best explanation for JFK's assassination is that a depressed Marine veteran who was too weird for the Soviet Union killed the President of the United States who was riding in an open car through a city that hated him. Like me, what a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and [e-mail] subscribe I'm Jane Coston and some stuff actually does just happen. What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily4. Our producer is Michelle Aloy. We had production help today from Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters and Julia Claire. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison and our executive producer is Adrienne Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America. East Foreign.

[Progressive]

Support for this podcast comes from Progressive, America's number one motorcycle insurer. Did you know? Riders who switch and save with Progressive save nearly $180 per year. That's a whole new pair of riding gloves and more. Quote today Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12 month savings of $178 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between October 2022 and September. Potential savings will vary.

[TaxAct]

TaxAct knows you probably don't need help filing taxes, but if you get stuck, we have live experts you can talk to. And who knows, you could hit it off and become long term tax friends. Staying up late at night talking about deductions, refunds, personal exemptions. Heck, you could even fall in love and create a little dependent of your own one day. Or they could just answer your filing questions. Tax act let's get them over with.