Trump's Cabinet, A Hodge-Podge Of Loyalists

Summary

Podcast Summary: "Trump's Cabinet, A Hodge-Podge Of Loyalists"

Podcast Information:

• Title: What A Day
• Host: Jane Coston
• Producer: Crooked Media
• Release Date: November 26, 2024
• Episode Title: Trump's Cabinet, A Hodge-Podge Of Loyalists

---

Introduction

In the episode titled "Trump's Cabinet, A Hodge-Podge Of Loyalists," host Jane Coston delves into the eclectic mix of individuals appointed by President-elect Donald Trump to his incoming Cabinet. Released on November 26, 2024, the episode offers an in-depth analysis of the diverse backgrounds and potential challenges within Trump's administration.

---

Trump's Cabinet Picks: An Eclectic Assembly

Jane Coston initiates the discussion by highlighting the varied nature of Trump's Cabinet nominees. Within three weeks post-election, Trump has announced most of his Cabinet members, blending traditional Republican figures with staunch MAGA supporters and even former Democrats. Notable appointments include:

• Marco Rubio, Florida Senator, appointed as Secretary of State.
• Doug Burgum, North Dakota Governor, selected as Secretary of the Interior.
• Kristi Noem, South Dakota Governor, chosen for the Department of Homeland Security.
• Pete Hegseth, Fox News host, named Defense Secretary.
• Scott Besant, a billionaire and former Democrat donor, appointed to the Treasury Department.
• RFK Jr., former Democrat, set to lead Health and Human Services.
• Tulsi Gabbard, ex-Congresswoman, nominated as Director of National Intelligence.
• Sean Duffy, former Congressman and reality TV personality, selected as Transportation Secretary.

Coston remarks on the diversity of perspectives within the Cabinet, questioning how these individuals will collaborate and align with Trump's agenda.

Notable Quote:

"Diversity of perspective and opinion is definitely a good thing, normally. But this is a Trump Cabinet. So how are all these people supposed to work together?"
— Jane Coston [00:02]

---

Analysis with Burgess Everett

To gain deeper insights, Coston converses with Burgess Everett, Congressional Bureau Chief for Semaphore. Their dialogue explores the unifying factors—or lack thereof—among Trump's Cabinet choices.

Lack of Ideological Cohesion: Everett expresses skepticism about ideological alignment among the nominees:

"I gotta admit, I'm not seeing much that unites them ideologically... No, I mean, you have establishment-friendly picks like Marco Rubio who even appeal to Democrats."
— Burgess Everett [02:26]

He notes the presence of both traditional Republicans and individuals with divergent views, such as former Democrats like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr., raising questions about the administration's coherence.

Conflicting Appointments: Coston points out apparent contradictions, such as Trump's nomination of Laurie Chavez Deremer for Labor Secretary—a centrist pro-union figure—despite the administration's general stance on deregulation.

Everett responds by referencing the emerging "JD Vance strain of Republicanism," which combines Trump's populism with a new pro-union positioning:

"It seems to be a pro union positioning... people like Josh Hawley."
— Burgess Everett [03:32]

He anticipates that actual governance may reveal whether these ideological stances hold or falter under political pressures.

Potential Ideological Rifts: The conversation shifts to potential conflicts within the Cabinet, especially concerning figures like RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, whose progressive views on issues like abortion and the environment may clash with traditional Republican policies.

Operational Dynamics: Everett speculates on how the Cabinet will function, suggesting that Trump's preference for public conflict might lead to a tumultuous working environment:

"But I do think people whose views differ from his own are going to not emphasize those views nearly as much... work for Trump, you work for Trump, you don't go off on the side."
— Burgess Everett [06:34]

He predicts a likely scenario where Cabinet members prioritize defending Trump over internal policy debates, potentially stifling genuine collaboration.

Ideological Anchors: Discussing the administration's guiding principles, Everett identifies JD Vance as a central figure whose approach may influence the Cabinet's direction. He also touches upon other factions, such as immigration hawks and those advocating for government spending cuts, questioning which group will ultimately steer policy.

Notable Quote:

"I would expect the same thing to play out here, where you not only don't have people breaking with Trump, but you also have people kind of running over each other to get to the cameras to defend him."
— Burgess Everett [08:12]

---

Implications for Governance and Policy

Everett speculates on the broader implications of such a diverse Cabinet:

• Policy Implementation: The lack of a unifying ideological framework may hinder effective policy execution, as differing viewpoints could lead to bureaucratic friction.

• Public Perception: An unpredictable and conflict-prone administration might affect public confidence and the perception of the government's stability.

• Internal Dynamics: With a mix of loyalists and more moderate figures, maintaining a cohesive strategy could prove challenging, potentially leading to high turnover and administrative instability.

---

Additional News Segments

Beyond the Cabinet discussion, the episode briefly touches upon several news items:

1. Special Counsel Jack Smith Drops Charges Against Trump:

   • Jane Coston [12:59]: Reports on Jack Smith's decision to drop the January 6 election interference case and another case regarding mishandling classified documents against Trump, highlighting the anticipated end of legal challenges before Trump assumes office.

2. California Bird Flu in Raw Milk:

   • Jane Coston [13:38]: Details California health officials' detection of bird flu in raw milk, leading to a voluntary recall by Raw Farms. The segment underscores the growing concerns over bird flu outbreaks since 2022.

3. Project 2025 and Its Impact on Pornography:

   • Jane Coston [15:00]: Explores the controversial Project 2025, which aims to outlaw pornography and link it to broader anti-LGBTQ efforts. The segment includes an interview with Siri Dahl, a performer advocating against the project's implications for free speech and the adult industry.

---

Interview with Siri Dahl: The Threat of Project 2025

In a poignant segment, Jane Coston interviews Siri Dahl, a performer involved in the "Hands Off My Porn" campaign, to discuss the ramifications of Project 2025 on sex workers and free speech.

Key Concerns:

• Legislative Threats: Project 2025 explicitly targets pornography, proposing severe penalties for creators, distributors, and facilitators within the adult industry.

• Free Speech Implications: Dahl emphasizes that such crackdowns threaten the very fabric of a free and open Internet, citing historical precedents where attacks on pornography have preceded broader censorship measures.

• Impact on Independent Creators: The proposed regulations would disproportionately affect independent content creators on platforms like OnlyFans and Fansly, potentially driving the industry underground and exacerbating issues related to non-compliance and illicit distribution.

Notable Quotes:

"The foreword of the Project 2025 plan says right there on page five. They want to make pornography illegal and put all the pornographers and those who distribute it or facilitate its production in jail."
— Siri Dahl [17:24]

"What this spells out is the end of a free and open Internet... that kind of treatment is just going to become the norm and it will just continue to get worse."
— Siri Dahl [19:15]

Dahl warns that Project 2025's measures could inadvertently make the Internet less safe for minors by pushing pornographic content to less regulated, offshore websites where age verification and ethical production are non-existent.

Impact Beyond the Adult Industry: Dahl argues that efforts to criminalize pornography are not isolated but part of a broader strategy to suppress LGBTQ communities by mischaracterizing their identities and expressions as pornographic.

---

Conclusion

The episode "Trump's Cabinet, A Hodge-Podge Of Loyalists" provides a critical examination of Donald Trump's diverse and potentially conflicting Cabinet appointments. Through insightful discussions with Burgess Everett and Siri Dahl, host Jane Coston elucidates the challenges and implications of such an administration, both within the government and in broader societal contexts. The episode underscores the complexities of governing with a Cabinet that lacks ideological cohesion and highlights the looming threats posed by legislative moves like Project 2025 on free speech and marginalized communities.

---

Notable Highlights:

• Eclectic Cabinet Composition: A mix of traditional Republicans, MAGA loyalists, and former Democrats raises concerns about policy coherence.
• Potential Internal Conflicts: Diverse ideological backgrounds may lead to friction and hinder collaborative governance.
• Impact of Project 2025: Legislative efforts to ban pornography could have far-reaching consequences for free speech and the LGBTQ community.

For listeners seeking comprehensive insights into the dynamics of Trump's incoming administration and related political developments, this episode offers a nuanced and engaging analysis.

Transcript

[Jane Coston]

It's Tuesday, November 26th. I'm Jane Coston, and this is what a day, the show that stands with peach and blossom, the two turkeys pardoned on Monday by President Joe Biden. Pardoned for what? We have no idea. What crimes could these two turkeys have possibly committed? Do they have legal representation? On today's show, Special counsel Jack Smith calls off charges against Trump. And California says it found bird flu and raw milk that's available in stores. Let's get into it. It's been just about three weeks since the election, and President elect Donald Trump has already named most of his Cabinet picks, including all of the big ones to head executive departments. And they are, in a word, eclectic. You've got some traditional Republican establishment types, people like Florida Senator Marco Rubio and North Dakota Governor Doug Burgum. They've been tapped for Secretary of State and Secretary of the Interior, respectively. Then there are the MAGA diehards like South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem, who Trump wants to head the Department of Homeland Security, and Fox News host Pete Hegseth, Trump's pick for defense secretary. There are also three former Democrats, including one billionaire who used to donate to Democratic causes. That's Scott Besant, Trump's pick to head the treasury department. The other two Dems are RFK Jr. Who's been picked to run Health and Human Services, and former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who Trump wants for Director of National Intelligence. Sure, diversity of perspective and opinion is definitely a good thing, normally. But this is a Trump Cabinet. So how are all these people supposed to work together? Will they find common cause beyond just wanting a seat at Trump's table? Or is The Trump administration 2.0 going to be like the Real World Capitol Hill with drama and backstabbing and at least one person crying in a confessional. And yes, there is also a Real World alumnus among the ranks of Trump's picks. That's former Congressman and Fox News personality Sean Duffy, who's Trump's pick for transportation secretary. He was a contestant on the Real World Boston in the late 1990s because anything is possible. So for more analysis on how all of this is supposed to work for Trump, I spoke with Burgess Everett. He's a congressional bureau chief for Semaphore. Burgess Everett, welcome back to what a Day.

[Burgess Everett]

Thanks, Jane. Nice to see you.

[Jane Coston]

So what, if anything, unites Trump's Cabinet picks beyond the fact that they've all hitched their proverbial wagons to him? And I guess a lot of them are from Florida.

[Burgess Everett]

Yeah, I gotta Admit, I'm not seeing much that unites them ideologically. If anything, perhaps stylistically. These are mostly folks that have stayed on his good side, especially since after January 6th, et cetera. But no, I mean, you have establishment friendly picks like Marco Rubio who even appeal to Democrats. You have former Democrats like Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. Who don't really appeal to Democrats. But I don't see anything being guided by Are all these people confirmable? Well, the answer is obviously not already because Matt Gaetz already withdrew. And so it's hard for me to see exactly how they put this team together.

[Jane Coston]

Well, I've been kind of obsessed by all of the contradictions in this cabinet. And one of the most obvious conflicts to me appears to be around Trump's pick for labor secretary, outgoing Oregon Republican Laurie Chavez Deremer. She's centrist and pro union, which doesn't really fly with the whole let's dismantle government regulations and fire everybody. So how's that going to work?

[Burgess Everett]

Well, I feel like this is the sort of the JD Vance strain of Republicanism, which is kind of like run with Trump's populism. But given it this sort of like new pro union. I don't even know if policy wise we can say that this is like a pro union ideology, but it seems to be a pro union positioning. And you can see that not only J.D. vance, but people like Josh Hawley. So I was surprised and it shows kind of like a clean break from those sort of the stereotypical country club Republicans that were pro business and anti union. We'll see how she actually, if she's confirmed how she actually governs and if she maintains that pro union stance and reputation. But you can also see there's some imprint from the unions that Trump was dealing with all election, like the Teamsters.

[Jane Coston]

Where else do you think we're going to see some of the biggest ideological rifts within this administration? I mean, RFK is an obvious one to me because the guy who wants to ban gummy worms and the let's dismantle government regulations people, that seems like a contradiction. But what do you think?

[Burgess Everett]

Yeah, I think definitely RFK Jr. I'm questioning whether Democrats will be able to wrap their head around his nomination enough to support him. But he's also got, you know, pro abortion rights views, pro environmentalist views that Republicans typically would not have been super excited about. I expect they're probably going to say that there's limitations to what the HHS secretary can do and they're going to be guided by what the President wants to do anyway. And so I expect a lot of the RFK views that are outliers in the Republican Party are going to be sort of minimized. I think Tulsi Gabbard is another one. She's a former Democrat. Hawkish Republicans, they may vote for her in the end. You know, I talked to one of them last week. It was Mike Rounds. He's on the Intel Committee. When I was talking to him about Trump's Cabinet picks, he said, Tulsi Gabbard is actually one that doesn't really rub me the wrong way. So I do think there's going to be some deference there. But this is somebody who's been kind of warm towards Russia and Syrian President Bashar al Assad. That's not like a down the line Republican position. So I think, you know, those two definitely stick out to me. And then Heg sets on the defense side. He's got sexual misconduct allegation against him on one hand. And then he's also got some stuff he's going to have to sort through with, like, is he experienced enough? He doesn't want women playing combat roles in the military. Does he soften that role a little bit? Because you have people like Joni Ernst who are veterans in the Senate, Republicans who are gonna have to vote on his nomination. So now that Matt Gaetz is out of the picture, those are kind of the three that I keep in the top of mind of these are the biggest fights going forward. It's just not clear whether it's gonna be an internal Republican fight or whether it'll be Democrats getting involved as well.

[Jane Coston]

Let's think though, beyond the confirmation process, theoretically they could all, all three could get confirmed. How will they work together? What about fights within the Cabinet? Because if I recall the first Trump administration, Trump loves conflict and the chaos kind of becomes a bit of the point. He likes it when everybody's fighting. So is this just in keeping with how he operates? And how would this actually function?

[Burgess Everett]

You know, I was reading about how it wasn't quite a team of rivals. But like you're saying, you, you do have some sort of friction there ideologically. Like we're saying, there's no unifying theory among these people. Even just looking at the top of the depth chart, like JD Vance, Marco Rubio, you can see a major difference in their hawkishness, their statements on Ukraine over the years. And so I think it's going to be a lot of different viewpoints. But I would expect that Trump has a way. I know that he does like the conflict. He does like kind of sorting this stuff out in public. But I do think people whose views differ from his own are going to not emphasize those views nearly as much as I think we think they are. Because once you work for Trump, you work for Trump, you don't go off on the side and do your own thing. And people that have done that have ended up getting booted out of the administration. Jeff Sessions didn't ideologically differ with Trump. He just wasn't hardcore enough defending him, and that was enough to toss him to the side. So I would expect the same thing to play out here, where you not only don't have people breaking with Trump, but you also have people kind of running over each other to get to the cameras to defend him.

[Jane Coston]

What do you think will be the ideological anchors of the next Trump administration? Like which faction of Cabinet picks ultimately will win out in a fight? The immigration hawks, the cut government spending group, the actually government spending doesn't matter group, The MAGA retribution group. Who wins here?

[Burgess Everett]

I would look to JD Vance as sort of the North Star of the Trump administration's Cabinet. I know he's also the vice president, but he's not really into cutting spending. I know that that's what we're hearing a lot about the Doge Caucus. It's hard for me to imagine them cutting spending to the degree that they're talking about. People love to talk about cutting government spending until you actually put programs on the line that you would need to cut. And then that's when you hear a lot of outrage about that.

[Jane Coston]

But the reference, I believe that there was something about sunsetting certain government programs, and someone pointed out, like, you want to cut Veterans Affairs. Do you really want to do that? You don't really want to do that.

[Burgess Everett]

I do think there's probably an aspect of making the federal government a punching bag in the sense of get workers back in the office. If they don't want to do it, get rid of them and replace them with people that will be back in the office. Wouldn't be surprised to see more efforts which start in the Trump administration, to relocate government offices. But I don't think that's a big priority of Trump's. I don't think that's a big priority of J.D. vance's, and I don't think the majority of the people that are being put in the Cabinet, that's something that rises to the top of their priority list as well. So I would probably be looking for somebody like the Labor Secretary pick to have more sway than you might think because the Republican Party's realignment and the voters that they're getting it may depend on keeping those people that voted for Trump that are working class folks around the country. And the way to do that is probably by appearing to be pro union and maybe even imposing pro union regulations or removing anti union regulations. So that is my best guess, and that's just a guess of how this ends up.

[Jane Coston]

Burgess, thank you so much for joining me.

[Burgess Everett]

Thanks so much for having me, Gene.

[Jane Coston]

That was my conversation with Burgess Everett, Congressional Bureau Chief for Semaphore. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe. Leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube and share with your friends. More to come after some ads.

[Siri Dahl]

The kind of burgers you get today tells you a lot about yourself. You're either someone who settles for sad, same old same old burgers, or you're at a Carl's Jr obsessed with a tangy OG Western bacon cheeseburger, demanding a house made guacamole, loaded guac bacon, fired up for the insanely hot El Diablo or craving a classic Charbold Famous Star. Give in to your flavor cravings. Get your mouth to Carl's Jr Big Burger good Burger.

[Jane Coston]

What a Day is brought to you by Sling. Seems like things change every 20 minutes. It's hard to keep up. That's why you should watch Sling. They provide the best value for your essential news channels. With Sling, you get all of your favorite news channels at the best price. Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, Hannity, Anderson Cooper, 360, the Rachel Maddow show, and more for just $40 a month. So yeah, with the election coverage and everything else happening, you can get news that will raise your blood pressure at prices that won't. Get the best price on news about what's going on in the world, then say that's what's going on in the world. And it's not just news. Check this out. Sling has the live sports, news and entertainment channels you love and less of the ones you don't, so you save hundreds of dollars. Sling lets you choose and customize your channel lineup so you can choose the channels you actually like. Sling's cloud DVR lets you record your shows to watch on your schedule. There's no complex technology, no long term contracts, and no hidden rigmarole. I need to be able to watch football and I need to be able to watch football on my schedule. That's why I love Sling. Get rewarded for watching your favorite news channels. Sling lets you do that. Visit sling.com now to learn more and get started. That's sling.com now sling.com now what a day is brought to you by Mint Mobile. With big wireless providers, what you see is never what you get. Mint Mobile is different. When Mint Mobile says you can get an unlimited plan for $15 a month, when you purchase a three month plan, that's what you'll get. To get this new customer offer, go to mintmobile.com whataday that's mintmobile.com whataday $45 upfront payment required, equivalent to $15 per month for the first three month plan only. Speed slower above 40 gigabytes on unlimited plan. Additional taxes, fees and restrictions apply. See Mint Mobile for details. And now the news.

[Burgess Everett]

Head of.

[Jane Coston]

Special counsel Jack Smith is officially moving to drop the January 6 election interference case against President elect Trump Jack Smith asked judges to drop both of his criminal cases against Donald Trump on Monday. That signaled an end to his efforts to hold the president elect accountable before he takes office. A federal judge granted Smith's request to drop one of them, the election interference case. Smith also dropped the bid to revive his other case against Trump that accused him of mishandling classified documents. Both cases were expected to fail once Trump assumes office. After all, the president elect went on the Hugh Hewitt show last month saying he'd fire Smith on day one.

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr.]

It's so easy, I would fire him within two seconds.

[Jane Coston]

The Trump hush money case in New York is where he was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying documents. Justice Juan Marchand is expected to finally issue a decision today on whether or not the president elect can be sentenced. California health officials announced on Sunday that they detected bird flu in raw milk that was available at stores. The milk was recalled by its producer, Raw Farms. The company tried to downplay the recall in a social media video. We're doing this voluntarily, which means the government's not making us do anything. We're choosing to just simply collect the item, you know, like you do when things are definitely fine. California health officials said that no one has gotten sick from this batch of raw milk and that pasteurized milk is safe to drink. But the recall comes just days after the first child in the US tested positive for bird flu. And since 2022, the Centers for Disease Control has detected bird flu in over 100 million poultry in 49 states, which would be scary enough without Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Who's promoted raw milk and loves disease, potentially becoming the head of the Department of Health and Human Services. It's gonna be a long four years, folks. In music news, Kendrick Lamar released one of the most devastating diss tracks of all time this summer, Not Like Us. And on Monday, his target, Drake, struck back in the most badass way he by filing a pre action petition. That's what you do in New York when you want people to think you might file a lawsuit. In Drake's filing, he accused distributors Universal Music Group and Spotify of conspiring to make the song appear more popular than it actually was and inflating download numbers. Drake's attorneys went so far as to accuse Universal of racketeering. That's a charge usually used to prosecute organized crime. And Trump in Georgia. A funny detail about this. Universal also distributes Drake's music. In response, Universal said in a statement, quote, fans choose the music they want to hear. And finally, unlike some other people, President Joe Biden is taking the high road. He and Jill Biden will attend Trump's inauguration on January 20, his spokesperson confirmed on Monday. Trump did not attend Biden's inauguration back in 2021. It took place two weeks after Trump told his supporters to march to the Capitol, where they proceeded to ransack it because Trump falsely claimed he won the 2020 election. And that' one more thing. Something you may have missed during all of the conversations about Project 2025 during the election was that the document calls for pornography to be outlawed and for the people who make it, performers, producers, hell, probably the guy who edits the title cards to be imprisoned. That's terrifying. And I say that because this isn't actually just about pornography. For One thing, Project 2025 links porn, to quote transgender ideology, as in trans people are the result of porn, which makes this effort part of a larger attempt to crack down on LGBTQ people by classifying their very existence in public as pornographic. That's something Republican lawmakers in some states have already tried to do with drag performances. During the election, a campaign called Hands Off My Porn featured performers and workers in the adult film industry talking about The Dangers Project 2025 poses for all of us. I spoke with Siri Dahlia, a performer who was involved in the campaign. Siri Dahl, welcome to what a Day.

[Siri Dahl]

Hi there. Thank you. I'm so glad to be here.

[Jane Coston]

So now that Trump is going to be the president, what does Project 2025 mean for sex workers? What are people most concerned about in your community?

[Siri Dahl]

Well, the foreword of the Project 2025 plan says right there on page five. They want to make pornography illegal and put all the pornographers and those who distribute it or facilitate its production in jail. Now whether that's actually a realistic thing to expect it anytime soon is a whole entirely other discussion. But at least the way that the Republican Party feels about, you know, my career field, about the adult industry in general and sex workers in general, that, that part is loud and clear. So there is no way that this is not going to have really large and negative ramifications for the adult industry.

[Jane Coston]

Right. And I mean, it goes from studios, producers, cinematographers, like it's an entire, like it's an entire field of content.

[Siri Dahl]

And every independent content. Yeah, and every independent content creator. I mean, the number of especially, you know, women and, and trans folks, queer folks who have found a way to make a living by making their own content and selling it on fan platforms like only fans or fansly. It's going to be interesting and very stressful to see how those kinds of platforms are affected because they've already been the target of a lot of censorship and I expect that just to get far worse.

[Jane Coston]

Especially because I think pornography and pornographers have historically been the canaries in the coal mine for crackdowns on free speech. Pornographers have historically been some of the most staunch advocates for free speech, arguing that crackdowns on their First Amendment rights are signs of further infringements on those rights for everybody. So what are the ways that these attacks on sex work and pornography could impact people outside of your industry?

[Siri Dahl]

Well, I mean, really what this spells out is the end of a free and open Internet. And unfortunately, most average Americans have no idea what that would look like because they've never been subjected to special forms of censorship and de platforming that sex workers have been subjected to for a while now. So for example, like just getting kicked off of a social media platform because even though you didn't do anything wrong and you didn't do anything against the guidelines, it's just like, nope, we don't want you here. You just kick, get kicked off. No explanation, no really way to appeal that decision. And that's been happening for a while with, with sex workers. But that, that kind of thing, that kind of treatment is just going to become the norm and it will just continue to get worse.

[Jane Coston]

Some people have argued that a crackdown on the porn industry in the US Would mean more success for pornography that's produced under less stringent protections than the industry here is under. I think people don't really know how strict the porn industry in the United States like the studios actually are. So if that industry in the US Is under threat, what's the potential global impact of all of this?

[Siri Dahl]

Oh, huge. I mean, one of the things that is really, really disturbing is seeing how hard the, and it's, I have to say, it's also bipartisan, the efforts to censor the porn industry, because, you know, Republicans come out and say it, we want to ban porn. Democrats generally don't do that. But they're absolutely not allies to sex workers. One of the writers, Russ VOGT of Project 2025, literally went on the record and said that they want to ban porn by going through the quote, unquote backdoor. And the backdoor he was referring to was age verification legislation. So they're already doing it. The plan is to make it so burdensome for adult companies to comply with these laws that get passed that they have no choice but to just go out of business. And it's going to make it harder for businesses to exist. The outcome of that is going to be the Internet's absolutely not safer for kids. Porn's not going to go away. I mean, porn is here to stay. You're not going to get porn off of the Internet. What you're going to do is make it impossible for people who want to run a compliant and legal business to actually do that. You're going to drive all that traffic to websites that are irresponsible, that are non compliant, that are mostly hosted overseas, that don't verify, they don't even verify the age of the participants. They don't verify the uploaders themselves. God knows where that stuff is coming from. And it is like the wild west, you know, so it's really bad.

[Jane Coston]

Thank you so much for your time. I really appreciate it.

[Siri Dahl]

Thank you so much.

[Jane Coston]

That was my conversation with Siri Dahl. Before we go Today on Pod Save America, Dan Pfeiffer sits down with senior staff from the Harris Walls campaign for their first postmortem interview. They reflect on what went wrong, why, and how we can move forward. This is a crucial conversation about lessons learned and the path ahead. Don't miss a special episode. Head to the Pod Save America feed or their YouTube channel to listen now. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, make sure your Thanksgiving turkey has adequate legal representation, and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading and not just about how to finally give up on the dream of making a homemade pie crust, because apparently making homemade pie crust is literally harder than anything else you could possibly do on earth. Like me. What a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and [e-mail] subscribe I'm Jane Coston and I demand justice for turkeys. What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our Associate producer is Raven Yamamoto. Our producer is Michelle Eloy. We had a production help today from Tyler Hill, Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters and Julia Clare. Our senior producer is Erica Morrison and our Executive producer is Adrian Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka.

[Siri Dahl]

The kind of burgers you get today tells you a lot about yourself. You're either someone who settles for sad, same old, same old burgers or you're at a Carl's Jr obsessed with a tangy OG Western bacon cheeseburger demanding a house made guacamole, loaded guac bacon, fired up for the insanely hot El Diablo or craving a classic char world famous star. Give into your flavor cravings to your mouth to Carl's Jr Big Burger skate.

[Robert F. Kennedy Jr.]

Burger if you're ready to elevate your driving experience, the first ever Kia K4 is worth a closer look. It combines style and performance with a sleek, futuristic design featuring starmap LED headl lights and an available panoramic display for unforgettable looks. SiriusXM comes standard in every Kia K4, bringing you closer to what you love. Plus, with an available 190 horsepower turbocharged engine, the Kia K4 delivers everything driving enthusiasts crave. Learn more at kia.com k4.