
President Donald Trump gave his first speech to the American people since taking office Tuesday night, and it was long. The president's address to Congress lasted more than 90 minutes breaking Bill Clinton’s 2000 State of the Union record. Trump talked about everything from tariffs to immigration to trans kids to the economy. Pod Save America’s Jon Lovett joins us to debrief the president’s rambling speech.
Loading summary
Jane Coston
It's Wednesday, March 5th. I'm Jane Coston, and this is what a day. A show that did not expect President Donald Trump to become bizarro. Oprah scholarships, Secret Service badges, wildlife refuges. It's all happening on today's show. We're talking about President Trump's first speech to the American people. And the speech was, well, it was a speech, the longest joint session speech in history, and you felt every single minute of it with lots of capital letters. It was a speech in which Trump emphasized that contrary to what you, me, Texas Democratic Representative Al Green, or millions of people think, everything is actually awesome. Super awesome. Except for Democrats, who are mean.
Donald Trump
I look at the Democrats in front of me and I realize there is absolutely nothing I can say to make them happy or to make them stand or smile or applaud. Nothing I can do.
Jane Coston
It was a campaign speech, which is weird because the campaign is over. It's been over. But not for Donald Trump, who felt the need to bring up former President Joe Biden, Stacey Abrams, and the nation of Lesotho. He brought up Biden a whole lot, actually, in the context of the economy, which he described as being way, way worse than I seem to remember, and immigration.
Donald Trump
The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation, we must have legisl to secure the border. But it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.
Jane Coston
Ew. But we did learn some fascinating, brand new, super fun things like that apparently trans kids are one of our biggest threats, a thing I absolutely do not believe for a goddamn second. We learned who really runs the Department of Government Efficiency. And despite what you may have heard from attorneys at the Department of Justice, it's who you think Go.
Donald Trump
Perhaps you've heard of it. Perhaps. Which is headed by Elon Musk, who is in the gallery tonight.
Jane Coston
Have fun in court explaining that. Guys, we learned that Democrats should support Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Because he has the last name Kennedy, and that we're super serious about cleaning up the environment, which is why we've handed the Environmental Protection Agency over to chemical lobbyists while cutting hundreds of jobs from the department.
Donald Trump
Our goal is to get toxins out of our environment, poisons out of our food supply, and keep our children healthy and strong.
Jane Coston
But remember, everything is awesome. So awesome. Mars trip level awesome.
Donald Trump
We're going to lead humanity into space and plant the American flag on the.
Jane Coston
Planet Mars and even far beyond to debrief Trump's address. Joining me is Pod Save America's Jon Lovett. Jon, welcome back to wad.
Jon Lovett
Thanks for having me.
Jane Coston
So, Lovett, yes, there were a lot of horrible things said tonight. So many lies, so much scapegoating. What in your opinion, was the most egregious part of Trump's remarks tonight?
Jon Lovett
I think what is most egregious is what he views as being worth time in the speech. It tells you a lot about what he cares about, right? Like there's more time spent on vilifying trans people than there was on Medicaid. Medic. Medicaid wasn't mentioned. The only person that mentioned Medicaid was Al Green, the congressman who protested. But I would say, like, if you're just going to pick out one kind of lie, because it was so brazen and so long lasting, it was the extended Social Security section in which he goes through in detail of all these brackets of ages of people that are receiving Social Security when basically just he's saying, oh, these hundred year olds and 200 year olds and 150 year olds are receiving Social Security benefits. We got to send Pam Bondi out there to find these, these criminals that are taking this money. But this has been debunked. They're just, this is not true. It's not happening. That was pretty egregious, the effort to paint trans teens. If you look at the studies, right, like, there are so few people getting gender affirming care as teenagers, even fewer of them are getting any kind of gender affirming care. Like, it's such a fleetingly small group of people. I think it's part of a constellation of issues that they use to kind of show that they're tribunes for the working people or for normal people, whatever that means to them, to a surprising degree. Because about all the vilification that we've seen, like Americans are largely supportive of trans people, but they think they have like an 80, 20, 70, 30 issue on athletes and on parents having a right to know. Right? So that's what the focus of the speech ends up being on. It's just awful. And like there's so many places where we're, you know, issues that are being raised are, are traps, right? But then sometimes, like, I don't, I don't care. I just want to jump in the trap for a little bit.
Jane Coston
Yeah. No, and it's also like, I don't care how it polls. I'm not, I don't, I don't care. But an issue that actually doesn't poll that great tariffs, right? Trump said that people would feel the pain a bit on tariffs, which was a hilarious thing for Republicans. And I'm starting to see that argument being made of like, oh, we have to suffer a little bit. I'm like, seems like a you problem. But he definitely didn't linger on that topic, even though it's the news of the day.
Jon Lovett
Yeah.
Jane Coston
Considering it's going to wreak havoc on American consum. Do you think he glossed over it because it's not flashy enough to talk about, or is he kind of nervous about how people feel about it? Because he loves tariffs. He thinks the word is beautiful.
Jon Lovett
It's interesting, the tilting at. There may be some disturbance, but we'll be okay. First of all, it's incredibly, an incredibly glib way to describe what could be like a recession. What could be like a sudden increase in the cost of the daily necessities of life that will make life much, much worse for a lot of people. Not billionaires, not Elon, not him, not the people that can afford to take the shock. But a lot of people can afford. Right. A sudden price shock. Also, I don't like, he's constantly talking about how brief it's going to be. And I like, I genuinely don't understand what is supposed to happen briefly. Like, it takes a long time to build a factory. It takes a long time to increase our ability to produce whatever it is you're tariffing from these other countries. Like you're going to make a steel plant, you make an oil refine. Like these are things that take a long time. So these tariffs just going to sit there for years, making life more expensive while we slowly build up capacity.
Jane Coston
The president also congratulated himself on his handling of Ukraine, saying that he received a supplicant letter from President Zelensky basically saying Ukraine was ready to bend over backwards and sign the minerals deal. How do these developments put their bonkers meeting into perspective?
Jon Lovett
I don't know whether that meeting was a setup or not, whether it was Zelensky taking the bait or not. But in the morning, signing this kind of deal with Ukraine, becoming more economically entwined in Ukraine in some way, whether or not there was a security guarantee was seen as the right thing to do. And then there's a fit of pique. And now all of a sudden we're cutting off aid. And now all of a sudden Zelenskyy saying he wants some kind of a deal and wants to sign what he had already said he would sign. All these guys, these like America first guys that kind of rationalize and intellectualize what Trump does are like we can't have an emotional foreign policy. We can't have a a foreign policy based on namby pamby values and the international order. We got to be realist. We got to do what is best for America. We got to always think about what is in our interest as a country. That is the only thing that matters if you are a realist. If you are making decisions based on hard nosed logic, no argument or tiff should change the long term security interest of the United States. Ukraine wasn't a different kind of ally in the morning than it was in the afternoon. The interest of Europe and how they aligned with ours versus Russia versus China didn't change because Zelensky called him JD instead of Mr. Vice President. And so like, what are we fucking doing here?
Jane Coston
We'll get to more of our conversation with John Lovett in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe. Leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube and share with your friends. More to come after some ad.
Jon Lovett
What.
Jane Coston
A day is Brought to you by Zebiotics Pre Alcohol let's face it, I'm in my late 30s. After a night with drinks, I don't bounce back the next day the way I used to. I have to make a choice. I can either have an amazing night or a great next day. That is, until I found Pre alcohol Zebiotics. Pre Alcohol Probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how it when you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's this byproduct, not dehydration, that's to blame for your rough next day. Pre alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre alcohol your first drink of the night. Drink responsibly and you'll feel your best tomorrow. Every time I have pre alcohol before drinks, I notice a difference the next day. Even after a night out, I can confidently plan on working out without worry this March Madness. Don't let anything sideline your celebrations. Grab pre alcohol before you go out and be ready to cheer on your team all day and all night long. Go to zebiotics.com wad to learn more and get 15% off your first order when you use code wad at checkout. Zebiotics is backed with a 100% money back guarantee, so if you're unsatisfied for any reason, they'll refund your Money, no questions asked. Remember to head to zebiotics.com wad and use the code WAD at checkout for 15% off. Let's get back to our conversation with Pod Save America's Jon Lovett. So something that struck me, like, Trump at his core, if he has one, is an entertainer or wants to be an entertainer, and tonight seemed especially rife with, like, glitzy bullshit. There was, like, salesmanship at handing out college acceptances and renaming a nature refuge. Clearly his favorite part of the speech. What did you make of that? Does he want to be weirdo Oprah?
Jon Lovett
So, yeah, he loves being Oprah in these parts of the speech. So the part where that kid gets into West Point and the part where he made that little boy a Secret Service agent, it worked on me. It's bullshit. It's exploitative. It worked on me. I thought it just did. But then he starts to turn it into how we've got RFK Jr. And he's gonna look into toxins and he's gonna look into autism in this sort of conspiratorial way. And then of course, like, the moment is ruined by the fact that this kid's being exploited and being led to this ridiculous agenda. Then you have this really kind of dark moment where basically naming this federal nature reserve after the victim of a brutal murder all to kind of gin up anti immigrant fervor because it was a crime committed by an undocumented immigrant. And like, that was sort of, that's what a lot of the people in the room were there to represent. Right? You had a volleyball player who had a run in with a trans athlete in some way had some sort of injury or I don't totally know the story. And that's why we've got to stop the trans athletes. And we have victims of crime from undocumented immigrants and like, kind of all the different kind of Trump villains and like the Trump enemies kind of, that's what the showmanship part of the speech was about.
Jane Coston
I think Democrats were stuck in, to me, an unwinnable position tonight. Some Democrats held up signs saying, like, Musk steals Save veterans. They were using their phones. Some didn't go. Women lawmakers wore pink. A lot of people just left early. Does any of this matter? And was there any way for Democrats to win this night? Like, should everyone have left Al Greenstal? Because here's something I was thinking about and I'm curious to hear your thoughts. Like, there is the base that's like, we want people to fight back. We want toughness. We want something like that. And then I just keep thinking about swing voters or people who don't pay any attention, who are like, why are they being so divisive? We wanna see people working together. And I don't know how you work those two things together. I don't know if that's possible. I don't know how that works. I thank God I am not a political consultant. I would be a terrible one. But, like, it seems like you are caught in a trap where if you do things that are like, yeah, the base is up. Well, the base would be up anyway. The base is going to be there for the midterms. But you need the people who are who were somehow convinced Trump was going to give them free ivf. Or you need the people who were convinced that Trump, because he said he wasn't involved in a Project 2025, he wasn't like, you need people who don't care about politics, but do see things on their phone.
Jon Lovett
It's right. We just recorded Positive America, and we are like, we're talking about this ourselves. And the way we kind of, yo, yo on this, right? Like, you know, we come out of Kamala's loss, we're like, it was too much about democracy. We need to focus on kitchen table issues. Then we see Donald Trump doing this, and people are kind of like, but what about the price of eggs? It's like, wait, you're missing the moment. This is about authoritarianism. This is about democracy. And I think the way to me, you square that circle is we're not like, the midterms are a long ways away. Donald Trump, barring things getting much, much worse, is not going to be on the ballot again.
Jane Coston
Mm.
Jon Lovett
And things could get much, much worse. So what is our goal right now? And I. I like, it is true that in the run up to 2024, Kamala Harris did not have a lot of Runway. And so she had to convince people based on where their heads were at right then. And at that moment, some share of voters were awake to the threat of authoritarianism. Some share of voters were into it. And then there were some share of the voters in the middle. Right. And I think the question for us is, okay, we have this group of people that understand the authoritarian menace they want us to fight, but there's this other big group of people that we also need to reach, as you said, that just don't view this as anything other than normal politics and are concerned about kitchen table issues. And I think we have to think about doing two things at once. Which is one, making sure we're speaking to those real needs, right? We need those people to view us as credible advocates, but also thinking like, hey, let's change this, right? Like, what do we do now to wake up more people to this menace, right? Like Donald Trump is rewarded for the fact that he can berate an ally, he can side with our adversaries, he can vote with Putin at the UN he can dispatch Elon Musk and illegally destroy federal agencies. And like, yeah, you may see some, some noise in the polls, but like America's not suddenly awoken to the fascist menace, right? Like we're things still feel as they did. Like, maybe the polls are ticking against them, but there's not some seismic shift. And I do think it's worth using this time to think about. Not how do we deal with the reality of the current politics of exactly what we're describing, but like, how do we change that, right? How do we get more people to understand this as a menace? And what does that look like, right? Like Al Green walking out. Like if more Democrats had done that. Like, by the way, poll, snap poll came out, most people thought that was divisive, right? Most people watching didn't like that. Is that okay? Maybe that's a good thing, right? Like what if what we have to do right now to, to make people understand the threat is do things that people don't like for a beat, right? That maybe don't pull well, that maybe don't test well. And the problem is when you do that, you kind of leave the data behind, right? And then you become what? Just like a, it's just about like our feelings and our instincts. But the other part of it is like we've tried these poll tested messages, we've tried offering people a normal alternative. It did not work. So, like, I don't feel like I like just to be clear, like I don't know what to do, I don't know what's right. But I just think we need to be open. Like, we need to like widen the aperture a little bit about like, what a good idea could be.
Jane Coston
John, as always, thank you for joining me.
Jon Lovett
Thanks for having me.
Jane Coston
That was my conversation with Pod Save America's Jon Lovett before we go. The Oscars were on Sunday, so, you know, keep it. Hosts Lewis and Ira are taking their gum out, throwing it at Georgina Chapman and rushing to the mic for some hot takes. Plus they're joined by the prindle queen herself, Brenda Song. Catch their full recap of Hollywood's biggest night and an interview you don't want to miss on the Keep it feed or YouTube. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, vote for whomever makes future president. Send all this shit in an email and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading and not just about how Seriously Presidents used to send their State of the Union or joint address to Congress as a written report before Woodrow Wilson, one of the worst people to ever live, resumed the big in person State of the Union in 1913. Like me, what a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and subscribe@crooked.com subscribe I'm Jane Coaston and as always, Woodrow Wilson was the problem. Water Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producers are Raven Yamamoto and Emily Foer. Our producer is Michelle Aloy. We had production help today from Johanna Case, Joseph Dutra, Greg Walters and Julia Claire. Our senior producer is Erika Morrison and our executive producer is Adrienne Hill. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.
Unknown
Businesses that are selling through the roof like Untuckit makes selling and for shoppers buying simple with Shopify, home of the number one checkout on the planet and with shop pay you can boost conversions up to 50%. Businesses that sell more sell on Shopify. Upgrade your business and get the same checkout untuck it uses. Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com podcastfree all lowercase go to shopify.com podcastfree to upgrade your selling today.
Summary of "Trump's Rambling Speech" Episode of What A Day
What A Day, hosted by Jane Coaston of Crooked Media, delves into the significant events shaping our world each morning. In the March 5, 2025 episode titled "Trump's Rambling Speech," Coaston provides an incisive analysis of former President Donald Trump's first address to the American people since leaving office. The episode dissects the content, delivery, and implications of Trump's lengthy joint session speech, offering listeners a comprehensive understanding of its impact on the current political landscape.
Jane Coaston opens the discussion by highlighting the unprecedented length of Trump's speech, noting it as "the longest joint session speech in history" (00:02). She emphasizes the president's unusual choice to deliver a campaign-style address despite the campaign season being officially over. Coaston points out that Trump touched on various contentious topics, blending hyperbolic praise for his administration with sharp criticism of Democrats.
Trump's speech was characterized by a stark contrast between his portrayal of his legacy and his denunciation of the Democratic Party. As Coaston summarizes, Trump declared, "everything is actually awesome. Super awesome. Except for Democrats, who are mean" (00:02). This duality set the tone for a speech that was both self-aggrandizing and divisive.
A significant portion of Trump's address focused on criticizing the current state of the economy and immigration policies. He asserted, "The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation, we must have legisl to secure the border. But it turned out that all we really needed was a new president" (01:20). Coaston notes that Trump repeatedly brought up former President Joe Biden, especially in discussions about the economy, claiming it was "way, way worse than I seem to remember" (00:48).
The speech delved into controversial topics such as transgender rights and government efficiency. Trump claimed that "trans kids are one of our biggest threats," a statement Coaston strongly disputes, saying, "a thing I absolutely do not believe for a goddamn second" (01:58). Additionally, Trump bizarrely attributed the leadership of the Department of Government Efficiency to Elon Musk, stating, "Perhaps you've heard of it. Perhaps. Which is headed by Elon Musk, who is in the gallery tonight" (01:58). Coaston expresses skepticism, remarking, "Have fun in court explaining that" (02:09).
Trump also addressed environmental concerns and space exploration in his speech. He announced handing over the Environmental Protection Agency to chemical lobbyists while cutting hundreds of jobs, aiming "to get toxins out of our environment, poisons out of our food supply, and keep our children healthy and strong" (02:28). In a surprising pivot, he declared plans to lead humanity into space, stating, "We're going to lead humanity into space and plant the American flag on the Planet Mars and even far beyond" (02:43).
Jane Coaston is joined by Jon Lovett of Pod Save America to deconstruct Trump's remarks further.
Lovett identifies the most troubling aspect of Trump's speech as the prioritization of certain issues over substantial policy discussions. He criticizes Trump's focus on vilifying transgender individuals more than addressing significant matters like Medicaid, which was scarcely mentioned (03:10). Lovett recounts Trump's unfounded claims about Social Security beneficiaries, stating, "these hundred-year-olds and 200-year-olds and 150-year-olds are receiving Social Security benefits" (03:10), labeling it a blatant lie.
Lovett argues that Trump's strategy of scapegoating specific groups serves to position himself as a champion for "working people" while alienating moderate voters. He notes, "Americans are largely supportive of trans people, but they think they have like an 80, 20, 70, 30 issue on athletes and on parents having a right to know" (03:10), highlighting the disconnect between Trump's rhetoric and public opinion.
The discussion shifts to Trump's remarks on tariffs, where he humorously stated, "people would feel the pain a bit on tariffs" (05:14). Lovett criticizes this approach, suggesting that such policies could lead to economic hardship for ordinary Americans despite benefiting the wealthy elite. He warns of the long-term negative effects, stating, "These tariffs just going to sit there for years, making life more expensive while we slowly build up capacity" (05:25).
Trump's handling of Ukraine is another focal point of the speech. He claimed to have received a "supplicant letter from President Zelensky" regarding a minerals deal, which Coaston and Lovett scrutinize.
Lovett questions the sincerity of Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Zelensky, pondering whether it was a setup. He criticizes the abrupt shift in policy from welcoming a deal to cutting aid, suggesting it undermines long-term security interests. Lovett asserts, "Ukraine wasn't a different kind of ally in the morning than it was in the afternoon" (06:34), highlighting the inconsistency in Trump's foreign policy stance.
Coaston and Lovett examine the Democratic Party's response to Trump's speech, noting the challenges Democrats face in countering his divisive narratives while appealing to swing voters and those indifferent to extreme partisanship.
Coaston observes the dilemma Democrats face: "You have the base that's like, we want people to fight back... and then I just keep thinking about swing voters or people who don't pay any attention, who are like, why are they being so divisive?" (11:15). Lovett agrees, emphasizing the need to address both authoritarianism and everyday "kitchen table issues" without alienating key voter segments.
Lovett suggests that Democrats must both address immediate policy concerns and work to raise awareness about the broader threats posed by authoritarianism. He underscores the importance of credible advocacy and innovative messaging to "wake up more people to this menace" (12:27), despite potential short-term political costs.
As the episode concludes, Coaston and Lovett reflect on the implications of Trump's speech for upcoming elections and the broader political climate. They stress the necessity for Democrats to adapt their strategies to effectively counteract Trump's populist tactics while uniting diverse voter groups around common goals.
This episode of What A Day offers a thorough examination of Donald Trump's recent speech, unpacking its content, rhetoric, and potential implications for American politics. Through insightful analysis and expert commentary from Jon Lovett, listeners gain a nuanced understanding of the challenges facing the Democratic Party and the broader electorate in navigating a highly polarized political environment.