Why We’re In A Redistricting Race To The Bottom

Summary

---

Podcast Summary: What A Day

Episode: Why We’re In A Redistricting Race To The Bottom

Date: August 22, 2025
Host: Jane Coaston (Crooked Media)
Featured Guest: Colin Allred (former U.S. Representative, current Democratic Senate candidate from Texas)

---

Main Theme & Purpose

This episode dissects the escalating "arms race" of partisan redistricting in U.S. states—a “race to the bottom” in gerrymandering, started by Republicans in Texas and rapidly echoed by Democrats in blue states such as California. Host Jane Coaston explores how these decisions threaten fair representation, their consequences for democracy, and what, if anything, can be done to break the cycle. Former Congressman and voting rights lawyer Colin Allred joins to offer insights from the Texas front lines and explain implications for voters nationwide—especially minority communities.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. The Spiral of Partisan Redistricting

• Texas Fires the First Shot:
  • Texas Republicans passed a new congressional map (potentially giving the GOP five more U.S. House seats) at breakneck speed, angering Democratic lawmakers.
  • Texas House Democrats tried to block the move by fleeing the state (risking arrest and fines), but couldn’t stall the inevitable: the GOP-controlled legislature pushed the map forward.
• Democratic Response: “Fighting Fire with Fire”
  • California lawmakers answered with a plan to redistrict for up to five new Democratic seats, despite their previously lauded independent commission.
  • Similar retaliatory efforts are expected in New York and Indiana.

“It looks like it’s time for Democrats to get off their high horse and then throw that high horse into a dumpster because sure, punching is wrong. But Republicans started it.”
— Jane Coaston [01:29]

---

2. The Texas Perspective with Colin Allred

The Blatancy of New Gerrymanders

• Allred notes the new Texas map will “steal basically five Democratic districts—majority minority districts,” disrupting deeply rooted communities with a history of hard-won representation (e.g., Houston’s Barbara Jordan district).
• The process is so brazen that it’s easier for the public to grasp the manipulation’s stakes.

“Many times when I would work on voting rights over a decade ago, we’d almost have a hard time explaining to folks what gerrymandering was... This one was so blatant that people understood it.”
— Colin Allred [03:32]

Personal and Community Cost

• Allred describes how the re-mapping destroys the local fabric:
  • His own district in Dallas is erased, packed and “cracked” in ways that defy logical representation; areas with little in common are merged, diluting local voices and connections.

“Serving in Congress for me was personal...The hospital I was born in was in my district...I didn’t just run anywhere...This just removes that public service element of it.”
— Colin Allred [05:17]

Broader Implications—A Dummy-Mander Backfire?

• Aggressive gerrymanders occasionally create “dummy-manders,” opening up supposedly safe seats to upsets if conditions change, as happened when Allred himself won a district designed to be unwinnable for Democrats.

“You can make competitive races to where, in a year that goes against you, that seat flips when you don’t think it would. That’s how in many ways I got into Congress.”
— Colin Allred [06:23]

Racial Impact

• The latest Texas map especially targets Black and Latino communities, reducing their representation—an impact Allred says has energized pushback, particularly within Black communities.

“What we’re seeing here is...Black and brown communities are going to have less representation. That’s fundamentally what’s going to happen here.”
— Colin Allred [07:12]

---

3. Making the Fight a Winning Issue for Democrats

• The GOP’s approach: create marginal districts and bank on Democratic voters not turning out.
• Allred emphasizes:
  1. Mobilize at the ballot box.
  2. Win statewide and ban gerrymandering nationally with nonpartisan redistricting commissions.

“The ultimate goal, I think, has to be to ban gerrymandering nationwide...We can require every state to have a nonpartisan redistricting commission like y’all have in California.”
— Colin Allred [08:38]

---

4. Dilemmas for Blue States

• With Republicans exploiting the rules, should Democrats stoop to their level?
• Allred stays firm: long-term solution is impartial, nonpartisan redistricting, not escalating the gerrymander arms race, but in the short-term, fighting back may be necessary.

“We have to fight fire with fire, with the goal of being that we’re going to ban this...”
— Colin Allred [10:18]

---

5. Framing to the Public

• The technical topic of gerrymandering must be presented in relatable terms, such as its economic impact, to connect with working-class voters.

“If you grew up the way I did... all these conversations about gerrymandering, we just probably wouldn’t have followed that. But you would follow that they gave you a tax cut to the rich and they’re trying to kick you off your health care and raise your costs..."
— Colin Allred [12:24]

---

Notable Quotes

• Jane Coaston:
  “I’d say I hope things get better for Elon, but I would be lying.” [00:17]
• Gavin Newsom (audio):
  “He’s rigging the 26 election before one vote is even cast.” [00:58]
• John Rosenthal, TX State Rep. (audio):
  “If these folks can redraw the lines and change the districts in this state in the span of just a few weeks, they could do it in front of every election.” [02:23]

---

Important Segment Timestamps

• Texas/GOP kicks off redistricting battle: [01:06–02:36]
• Colin Allred interview begins: [03:18]
  • The flight of Democratic lawmakers: [03:20]
  • Impact on minority districts: [04:13]
  • Personal cost and community representation: [04:59–06:02]
  • Fight and strategy moving forward: [07:24–12:46]

---

Other News Headlines [15:52–24:44]

• Trump and VP J.D. Vance focus on crime, law enforcement, and jobs in Georgia;
• Russia strikes a U.S.-owned factory in Ukraine amid continued uncertainty over Trump’s “peace efforts”;
• The DOJ’s rising scrutiny of gender-affirming care for minors sparks concern among hospitals and doctors;
• Trump’s public appearances, including a surreal brag about his “expertise in grass” and promises to revitalize Washington, D.C.’s parks.

“I know more about grass than any human being, I think, anywhere in the world.”
— Donald Trump [21:31]

---

Memorable Moments

• Jane Coaston’s dry humor in discussing both news and political hypocrisy, such as Democrats now abandoning high-mindedness about maps:
  “It’s time for Democrats to get off their high horse and then throw that high horse into a dumpster...” [01:29]
• Allred’s personal stories about representation, offering a human angle to the gerrymandering debate.

---

Original Tone & Language

• The episode maintains a mix of earnest concern, sharp skepticism, and wry, incisive humor—especially from Coaston, who deploys sarcasm while dissecting political maneuvers and absurdities.

---

Summary Takeaway

The episode argues America is witnessing an aggressive, cyclical entrenchment of political power through gerrymandering—initiated in Texas, spreading nationwide. The harm is not merely abstract: it deeply affects minority representation and faith in the system. The solution, according to Allred and Coaston, is a national, nonpartisan fix—but in the meantime, both parties are locked in a dangerous escalation.

---

For listeners who missed the episode:
You’ll come away understanding exactly why redistricting is suddenly so controversial and urgent, the human cost behind “maps,” and why the results could determine not just the 2026 midterms, but the direction of American democracy itself.

Transcript

[A]

It's Friday, August 22nd. I'm Jane Costen and this is what a day. The show that is wishing Elon Musk the best after his very bad Wednesday. That's the day he found out he has to pay $500 million to 6,000 workers he fired when he took over Twitter. It was also the day a judge said he must face a lawsuit filed by voters who say he defrauded them when he ran a $1 million lottery during the end of the 2024 presidential campaign. I'd say I hope things get better for Elon, but I would be lying. On today's show, President Donald Trump says thank you to law enforcement patrolling the crime riddled Streets of Washington, D.C. and Russia launches another aerial assault against Ukraine. But let's start with the great redistricting race of 2025.

[B]

It's all at stake. It's happening in real time. People need to wake up, need to open their eyes. He's rigging the 26 election before one vote is even cast.

[A]

That's California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. After hours of debate Thursday, California lawmakers passed a redistricting plan aimed at winning Democrats up to five more U.S. house seats in the 2026 elections. That's just the latest step in the tit for tat gerrymandering battle playing out between red and blue states started by none other than Trump loyalist Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott. The goal? Keep a comfy majority in Congress or claw your way to one by whatever means necessary. After Abbott and Newsom made moves to redistrict their states, New York and Indiana may be soon to follow. It looks like it's time for Democrats to get off their high horse and then throw that high horse into a dumpster because sure punching is wrong. But Republicans started it.

[B]

They fired the first shot.

[C]

Texas.

[B]

We wouldn't be here had Texas not done what they just did.

[A]

Here's what Texas did. The state's Republican controlled House of Representatives passed a new congressional map Wednesday night that could give the GOP five more seats in Congress, which understandably made Texas House Democrats furious. Here's Texas Democratic House Representative John Rosenthal at a press conference Wednesday evening.

[B]

This process, y', all, was a total sham from the very beginning. And I don't know if you saw some of the questions I asked on the House floor today, but if these folks can redraw the lines and change the districts in this state in the span of just a few weeks, they could do it in front of every election.

[A]

Texas Democrats did their best. They literally fled their state for weeks, risking arrest and accruing hefty fines to stop the Texas House GOP from reaching quorum and passing the Republican favoring map. But Democrats couldn't stay away forever, and the House approved map will now head to the state Senate, where it's likely to pass since the Texas Senate is also under GOP control. Meanwhile, the California map needs approval from voters in a special election scheduled for November. So now what? I thought I'd ask former U.S. representative and current Democratic candidate for U.S. senate, Colin Allred. He stopped by the studio to break down what all this means for his home state and the 2026 midterms. Colin Allred, welcome to Water Day.

[C]

Yeah, thanks for having me.

[A]

More than 50 Democratic reps fled the state to avoid votes on the new GOP maps, only to have the state close to getting those maps finalized anyway, likely this week. Do you think it was worth it?

[C]

It was. And you know, I was a voting rights lawyer before I was ever in Congress, after, after I played the NFL. And, and you know, this is something I've been fighting against my whole career. But I think in many ways this was so blatant that folks understood this. Many times when I would work on voting rights over a decade ago, we'd almost have a hard time explaining to folks what gerrymandering was, what a voter ID would do in terms of discriminatory impact. This one was so blatant that people understood it, but it needed time for people to hear about it. And that's what I think it gave was time and then also for other states to organize and say we're going to respond.

[A]

For folks who only watch the headlines from outside of Texas, how many districts would be affected by these maps and what would the before and after look like?

[C]

Yeah, so they are trying to, and they're, they're going to pass this map. It's going to steal basically five Democratic districts. And these are majority minority districts. They're messing with historic districts like in Houston, Barbara Jordan's district that was created after the Voting Rights act, that communities fought for for decades to have a representative. You know, as somebody who represented my hometown and the area where I was born and raised in the Dallas area. You know, I don't know how you would even represent some of these districts that they've drawn.

[A]

As you've mentioned, you were a three term House rep from Texas's 32nd district in the Dallas suburbs. How would the new maps change your old political stomping ground?

[C]

Well, the district that I represented had already been gerrymandered in the turn of our decade here. So my first two terms was a gerrymandered Republican seat that I'd flipped my third term. They had put me, packed me into a blue district that was a majority minority district and that is now gone. That district is completely destroyed. And so they've taken us from having three Democratic seats in the Dallas Fort Worth area when we probably should have five, but they're going to take that down to two. And they're doing that by just doing the most extreme packing and cracking, but also taking these districts and flinging them way out to parts of the state that have really nothing to do with Dallas or they have different interests. And that's ultimately what I get frustrated with, is that serving in Congress for me was personal because the hospital that I was born in was in my district. The high school that I went to was in my district. I knew every cross street and I didn't just run anywhere. I ran because I knew that area. This just removes that public service element of it.

[A]

You are running for a U.S. senate seat from Texas. That race is statewide, so it's not limited to a district. But I'm thinking about the spillover effects of these maps though. How do you expect this fight over maps to affect races and seats that are not tied to just one district?

[C]

I think there's a couple of impacts that it could have. One is that sometimes a gerrymander can become a dummy mander and you can make competitive races to where in a year that goes against you, that seat flips when you don't think it would. That's how in many ways I got into Congress. I ran in a gerrymandered seat for a 22 year incumbent Republican. It was drawn for him. It was supposed to be unwinnable for a Democrat, but it was changing. And I thought that he got lazy. And so we beat him in 2018 in the seat that he thought he couldn't be beaten in. So I think there's a possibility that there will be more races and more competitive races. But I think the other thing is that as I said, you know, they, they've kind of woken up something by being so blatant about this and about this power grab being so in your face that I think it's kind of gotten people back up off their backsides a little bit. You know, it's like when a bully pushes you too far, then you want to fight back. And I think, particularly in the black community, that's what I'm saying, because much of this is targeted. What we're seeing here is it's this black and brown communities are going to have less representation. That's fundamentally what's going to happen here.

[A]

I saw a tweet that you put out about all of this. You said, quote, the GOP just shoved these racist, nonsensical maps through. They've rigged the game, but they can't silence Texans. We'll take this fight to the ballot box, and we'll win. The maps are literally meant to discourage Democrats from voting by defusing their votes within new GOP majority districts. How are Democrats supposed to make this latest redistricting fight a winning issue?

[C]

Yeah, well, number one, as I said, I think. I think it's woken people up. But the other thing I think is that when you draw these maps like this in a state where the numbers don't add up, where you're trying to get this many seats for Republicans, what it's going to end up doing is they're going to have some more marginal districts. Right. And they're going to have some areas. What they're really relying on is that we don't come out to vote in some of those areas and that we can try and fight back with. Right. Because there's no way to reduce us from where we are, I think, from 11 seats down, taking five away to this point, without putting a lot of Democrats into some of these Republican seats. Right. And so I do think we have to fight there, but then I think the ultimate fight has to be to win races statewide, to make sure that we, in this midterm, retake the House, retake the Senate. And then the ultimate goal, I think, has to be to ban gerrymandering nationwide. And we can do that. We can require every state to have a nonpartisan redistricting commissions like y' all have in California. And I worked on that when I was in Congress. We passed that out of the House. We just couldn't get it to the Senate. I think we can do that.

[A]

I mean, it. It's interesting you bring up California, because right now, because of what's been happening in Texas, you have Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom basically saying, like, yeah, I know we've got this independent redistricting commission, but we see what's happening in Texas, where, you know, now California wants to change its maps to gain Democratic seats. You know, you were just talking about a gerrymandering ban before Trump basically asked Texas to revisit district lines to give him more votes. Where did you stand on how redistricting should happen. And did this episode change how you feel about it?

[C]

Yes, it doesn't change how I feel about it. I've always. I hate gerrymandering. I hate it for a number of reasons. I hated it as a voting rights lawyer because what it does is it leads folks to think that why should I vote? The election's already rigged. Whether you're in a safe Democratic seat, safe Republican seat, why should I even vote? I ran into that all the time during my voting rights career. But as a member of Congress, I think it's broken the House because it produces all these extremists who really only have to worry about getting elected by a small segment of their primary electorate. And so they get to Congress and they're just wiling out. They don't have any interest in governing. Why should they? That's not what their incentive is going to be for getting reelected. Right. They're not going to run on the bills they've passed. They're going to run on all the rocks that they've thrown. When you reach a tipping point and you get too far of that, that's when you get a Congress like we have now that's completely broken. And so I always hated it. What I think now is that we have to fight fire with fire, with the goal of being that we're going to ban this. I don't think we can just say we're just going to continue to circle the drain and every state should do the most extreme gerrymander they can. That to me doesn't make any sense. But we can say we're not going to let you rig this election. We're going to respond to it. And then when we have the power, we're going to ban this and we're going to require every state to have nonpartisan drawing of their districts. We can do that.

[A]

So that actually goes to my last question for you, which is I was talking about California Democrats. They're talking about this issue in New York. And Illinois's governor has hinted he'd consider redistricting to give Democrats an edge there. What would you recommend to Democrats in power in blue states on this issue?

[C]

I think that what we're probably going to see is that this will not end in Texas and that this White House we've already seen, they've asked, I think, Indiana to consider. They'll go to other Southern states everywhere where they know they have total control. And I think that this will continue up until the point where it's too late, running up into primaries and things like that. And so I just think that this is what I hate about what they've set off here, is that this is a race to the bottom, right? But I think for any leader sitting there thinking we may have to respond, I think it has to have an end goal in mind, that the response is that this is short term. The response is that we're doing this so that the election can't be rigged. But we're doing this also with the goal that we're going to make sure that given the power, we'll end this practice. When we're talking about it, though, it can't just be that we're doing this for politics. We're doing this because they're trying to rig the elections, because they want to rig the economy. They're rigging the economy against working people. They pass this bill, they want to avoid the consequences of it. And talk about that to normal folks. Because if you grew up the way I did, being raised by a single mom, all these conversations about gerrymandering, we just probably wouldn't have followed that. But you would follow that they gave you a tax cut to the rich and they're trying to kick you off your health care and raise your costs, right? And say, hey, listen, this is why they're trying to do that and make sure that we connect this political act that they're doing to what they're doing to real people.

[A]

Colin Allred, thank you so much for joining me.

[C]

All right, thank you. Appreciate it.

[A]

That was my conversation with former U.S. representative and current Democratic candidate for U.S. senate, Colin Allred. We'll get to more of the news in a moment, but if you like the show, make sure to subscribe. Leave a five star review on Apple Podcasts, watch us on YouTube and share with your friends. More to come after some ads. What a Day is brought to you by Nutrafol. If you're dealing with hair issues like thinning or shedding, but feel totally stuck on what to try next, I get it. There are so many products out there and it's hard to know which ones are actually going to do anything. But Nutrafol is physician formulated, clinically tested and even recommended by dermatologists. In fact, Nutrafol is the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand trusted by over one and a half million people. You can feel great about what you're putting into your body. Since Nutrafol hair growth supplements are backed by peer reviewed studies and NSF Content Certified, the gold standard in third party certification for supplements. While many supplements rely solely on ingredient studies. Nutrafol clinically tests final formulations to ensure their efficacy using a variety of hair measurement tools like hair counts and pull tests to assess growth, quality, shedding and texture. See Thicker, stronger, faster growing hair with less shedding in just three to six months with Nutrafol. For unlimited time, Nutrafol is offering our listeners $10 off your first month subscription and free shipping. When you go to nutrafol.com and enter the Promo Code Day. Find out why Nutrafol is the best selling hair growth supplement [e-mail] spelled n u t r-a dash f o l.com promo code day that's nutrafol.com promo code.

[D]

Day think you know your breaking point? If you're a woman with weak bones due to osteoporosis after menopause, sadly, you may not. Women can lose up to 20% of their bone density within five to seven years after menopause, making bones weaker and more likely to break. And after the first fracture, we're five times more likely to break another bone within a year. It could happen from a simple slip or just bending to lift a bag of groceries. Don't wait for a breaking point. Visit bonebreakingpoint.com to learn about how osteoporosis medications can reduce the risk of fractures.

[E]

Hi there, it's Andy Richter, and I'm here to tell you about my podcast, the three Questions with Andy Richter. Each week, I invite friends, comedians, actors and musicians to discuss these three where do you come from, where are you going, and what have you learned? New episodes are out every Tuesday, with guests like Julie Bowe and Ted Danson, Tig Notaro, Will Arnett, Phoebe Bridgers, and more. You can also tune in for my weekly Andy Richter Call in show episodes, which where me and a special guest invite callers to weigh in on topics like dating, disasters, bad teachers, and lots more. Listen to the three Questions with Andy Richter wherever you get your podcasts.

[A]

Here's what else we're following today. Head of Lines.

[F]

I'm here, of course, as a representative of the President of the United States that has done more for the prosperity of the American worker than a president, any president President in a generation. So can we give it up for President Donald J. Trump? Because I know he's watching.

[A]

On Thursday, Vice President J.D. vance praised Trump with a level of enthusiasm I assumed he was only capable of in the presence of a sectional. If you're watching on YouTube, you can see just how excited he was. Vance spoke at a refrigeration plant in Fayette County, Georgia. He was joined by a group of the plant's employees who stood under a large sign reading Jobs, Jobs, Jobs. During his remarks, Vance talked up Trump's big beautiful law and dissed Georgia Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff, who will be up for re election in a year.

[F]

And the simple answer is because Jon Ossoff, whatever he pretends to be in his television commercials, he doesn't give a damn about the third District and he doesn't give a damn about the people of Georgia. But we do. And we're gonna fight for you every single day.

[A]

Sure. Vance touched on a wide range of topics during his appearance, making sure to play all the MAGA hits. I'm talking immigrants stealing your jobs, the threat of the mentally ill, quote, festering in our streets, and why it's somehow racist to reduce police presence in public. The vice president also focused closely on public safety in Washington, D.C. and Atlanta.

[F]

I don't care what your political party is, but if you're a family and you want to take your kid to a nice meal in downtown Atlanta, it's about a 40 minute drive. Take your kid to a nice meal in downtown Atlanta. You ought to be able to without being harassed by a criminal. We got to take America's streets back for the American people. And that's what the president United States is doing every single day anyway.

[A]

He claimed armed robberies were down by over 50% in Washington, D.C. in the last 10 days, ever since Trump mobilized the National Guard without citing any sources. Russia launched a missile attack on western Ukraine overnight, officials said Thursday, striking targets including an American owned electronics plant. It comes after President Trump tried to play middleman, holding separate talks about peace with Russian President Vladimir Putin last week and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday. But this latest attack injects further uncertainty into Trump's efforts to end the years long war. Russia's Defense Ministry said the strikes targeted, quote, enterprises of the Ukrainian military industrial complex. Sure. But on Twitter, Zelenskyy wrote, quote, the Russians practically burned down an American company producing electronics, home appliances, nothing military. He added this Zelenskyy is saying there, quote, we believe this was a deliberate strike specifically on American owned property here in Ukraine, on American investments. A possible meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin is still up in the air. Russia's foreign minister said Thursday Putin is ready to meet with Zelenskyy to discuss peace terms, but only after key issues have been worked out by senior officials, which could take a very long time, I would assume relentlessly bombing another country might make the negotiating process more difficult. The Department of Justice subpoenaed the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for information on gender affirming care it's given to minors. That's according to reporting by the Washington Post. The subpoena, which was sent in June and made public on Monday, requested private information about those patients, for example, their Social Security numbers, home addresses and dates of birth. Beyond that, the subpoena also requests, quote, every writing or record of whatever type related to treatment of young transgender patients, including emails, zoom recordings, encrypted text messages and voicemails. Last month, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the DOJ had subpoenaed more than 20 doctors and clinics that treat young transgender patients. Since then, more than a dozen US Hospitals have downsized or ended their gender transition programs for patients under 19. One doctor told the Washington Post, quote, frankly, I'm looking over my shoulder driving home.

[B]

You guys are doing a fantastic job and gals doing an amazing job and we appreciate it. The numbers are down like we wouldn't believe, but we believe it. Where do I stand here?

[A]

Trump took a stroll around the neighborhood. And by that I mean he appears to have been driven to a police precinct and thanked law enforcement for patrolling Washington, D.C. thursday evening. Of course, there was someone else who deserved congratulations.

[B]

I've never received so many phone calls thanking me for what we've done in Washington, D.C. from people that haven't gone to a restaurant in literally in four years.

[A]

Yes, he is absolutely receiving calls thanking him from people who are definitely real. Definitely real people who hadn't gone to a restaurant in four years calling Trump zero lies there. It's been just a matter of days since Trump declared a national emergency in the Capitol. During a press conference at the White House last week, Trump justified his decision by citing violent crime in the District. Since then, Trump has federalized D.C. s police force and deployed the National Guard. So far, hundreds of National Guard troops have arrived in D.C. but Trump didn't stay on message for long during his amble. He moved on to other self proclaimed accomplishments like his expertise in grass.

[B]

I know more about grass than any human being I think anywhere in the world. And we're going to be regressing all of your parks, all brand new sprinkler systems, the best that you can buy. Just like Augusta. It'll look like Augusta. It'll look like, more importantly, Trump National Golf Club. That's even better.

[A]

You know what? I do believe that Trump knows more about grass than anyone else. I think he should talk about grass and only about grass for the next three and a half odd years. And that's the before we go While there's a lot to be uncertain about right now, there's one thing we know for sure. The answer to rising authoritarianism is a big, diverse democratic movement powerful enough to defeat it. That's why we are bringing all the important people together at CrookedCon November 6th and 7th in Washington D.C. with Pod Save America hosting a live show November 6th. Then November 7th there will be a full day of conversations with Democratic leaders, strategy focused panels, grassroots organizing, and opportunities to get together with other angry slash hopeful slash exhausted people. There will also be drinks. Tickets are going fast, so get yours [e-mail] use the code freedomandcontent for a discount on tickets to the November 7th all day event. That's all for today. If you like the show, make sure you subscribe, leave a review, contemplate the apparent importance of the new Cracker Barrel logo and tell your friends to listen. And if you're into reading and not just about how the chain restaurant has taken the barrel out of its logo and changed its interior decor. And in response, many on the right lost their damn minds. So much so that the company stock tanked. Like me, what a Day is also a nightly newsletter. Check it out and [e-mail] subscribe I'm Jane Costen and everyone needs to take a minute, go outside, pet a dog because it's Cracker Barrel. What a Day is a production of Crooked Media. It's recorded and mixed by Desmond Taylor. Our associate producer is Emily Foer. Our video editor is Joseph Dutra. Our video producer is Johanna Case. We had production help today from Greg Walters, Matt Berg, Shauna Lee and Gina Pollack. Our senior producer is Erika Morrison and our senior vice president of news and politics is Adrienne Hill. We had help with our headlines from the Associated Press. Our theme music is by Colin Gilliard and Kashaka. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

[D]

Think you know your breaking point? If you're a woman with weak bones due to osteoporosis after menopause, sadly, you may not. Women can lose up to 20% of their bone density within five to seven years after menopause, making bone bones weaker and more likely to break. And after the first fracture, we're five times more likely to break another bone within a year. It could happen from a simple slip or just bending to lift a bag of groceries. Don't wait for a breaking point. Visit bonebreakingpoint.com to learn about how osteoporosis medications can reduce the risk of fractures.

[E]

Hi there, it's Andy Richter, and I'm here to tell you about my podcast, the Three Questions with Andy Richter. Each week, I invite friends, comedians, actors and musicians to to discuss these three questions. Where do you come from, where are you going, and what have you learned? New episodes are out every Tuesday, with guests like Julie Bowe and Ted Danson, Tig Notaro, Will Arnett, Phoebe Bridgers, and more. You can also tune in for my weekly Andy Richter Call in show episodes, where me and a special guest invite callers to weigh in on topics like dating, disasters, bad teachers, and lots more. Listen to the Three Questions with Andy Richter wherever you get your podcast.