Loading summary
Transcript106 lines
- [00:00]
Cabot Phillips
Hi, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Are you looking for a beach read this summer? May I suggest your big wireless build? It's got suspense, mystery, a slightly flat emotional arc and a shocking twist where you realize you've been overpaying the entire time. Fortunately, though, Mint's story is better. Every plan $15 a month, even unlimited. That's it. Happy ending, zero tears. Give it a try@mintmobile.com Switch upfront payment
- [00:23]
Bev Turner
of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for a 12 month plan required $15 per month equivalent
- [00:26]
Mary Margaret Olihan
taxes and fees Extra initial plan term
- [00:28]
Bev Turner
only greater than 50gb. Me slow when network is busy, see terms.
- [00:30]
Cabot Phillips
Good evening everybody, and welcome to Wired In. I'm Cabot Phillips coming to you live from Daily Wire hq. I hope you all had a wonderful weekend. We've got a lot to get to. President Trump made his long awaited return to the White House Correspondents Dinner and he roasted the legacy media to their faces. We'll talk to someone who was in the room and play you the highlights from a wild night in D.C. congress has obtained the private journal of Dr. Anthony Fauci. Yes, this is a real story and it is every bit as cringeworthy as you would expect. But more importantly, we're going to tell you what that journal exposes about the alleged effort to lie to the American people. And don't look now, but midterms are 100 days away. We'll get you up to speed on the latest races and tell you about a shocking new poll that has Democrats doing a double take. We'll also talk about a wild court case in Ohio where a woman was just convicted of a crime for using mean words. And we'll get you the latest on yet another Islamic terror attack in Europe. Stick around, of course, until the very end of the show for our live listener Q and A. If you're a Daily Wire member, get your questions in the chat now. If you're on Apple or Spotify and you want to join in, you got to go to sign up@dailywire.com subscribe. All right, let's do this thing. Let's have a good Monday. Roll that graph. And just a reminder, Wired In Live is now streaming live at 4pm Eastern Monday through Thursday. Get daily coverage of the news happening right now and hear why it all matters from experts who are actually in the story. And again, join our live chat@dailywire.com subscribe if you watch live on Daily Wire, I'm usually in the chat before the show starts. So I get to hang out and talk to our audience before things even get going. Shout out to everybody in the live chat beforehand. Let's kick things off, though, in Washington, D.C. with Daily Wire White House correspondent Mary Margaret Olihan. Mary Margaret, it's great to see you.
- [02:30]
Mary Margaret Olihan
It's great to be here.
- [02:32]
Cabot Phillips
We loved seeing your pictures and videos from the White House Correspondents Dinner. Obviously, this event initially took place earlier this summer. It was postponed after that attempted shooting against President Trump and other members of the administration. What was the vibe like for this event for its second go round?
- [02:52]
Mary Margaret Olihan
Well, the vibe was interesting. I kind of expected people to be a little more, you know, maybe a little more nervous. I didn't pick up on that necessarily. I will tell you. It was held in the Waldorf story in downtown Washington, D.C. which is the old Trump Hotel. The last White House correspondent center where there was the assassination attempt was held at the Washington Hilton. So very different venues, this Waldorf Hotel. First of all, I think the Secret Service understands it better because as Trump said repeatedly the other night, he actually built it up and made it into Trump Hotel. So he understands it very well. He was making jokes about how he knows what the chandeliers are made out of and understands the hotel very, very well. So when it came to security, the actual ballroom is on a different side of the hotel with less access for the guests to get to, whereas in the Washington Hilton, it was very easy for guests to get down to this place where the event was being held, which is a little insane when you think about it. And that is how Cole Thomas, or Cole Allen Thomas, the shooter or the attempted assassination, the attempted assassin, that was how he got down to the event and thankfully was taken out of commission by the Secret Service. Now, on Friday, when we went, I got all dolled up. I'm ready to go. I'm with my friends. We're walking in. And we got there right as the motorcade arrived. So that was a little interesting because the motorcade's coming in, the police are blocking off all the entrances. And so all these guests in their very fancy outfits are standing there on the street. And there were plenty of protesters who were there as well. So I was looking around for sure, kind of trying to assess the surroundings. I was a little nervous at that point because we couldn't get in. We also had to stand there. We're obviously going to the event, but after that, once we got in, I felt very safe. There was security everywhere. They were watching us like hawks. And then once we got into the ballroom itself. It was pretty cool. Everyone and their mother was there, all these reporters, legacy, conservative, mainstream new media. And then, of course, you had all these cabinet officials, Pete Hegseth, Stephen Miller, Stephen Cheung, Susie Wiles, all of these top Trump administration officials. And then, of course, this was very surreal. Up on the stage itself was President Donald Trump, seated next to Jackie Heinrich and Ouija Jiang, who's the president of the White House Correspondents Association. Caroline Levitt, Now Vice President. J.D. vance was at the last dinner. He was not at this one because he just had another baby. So he had his fourth child. Usha Vance gave birth to their fourth child. I believe his name is Alec, very recently, so he did not attend this time. But other than that, things seem to go very well. Although depending on who you talk to, some people might say the president was a little too mean.
- [05:36]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, I wanna get to that. What were some of the comments we heard from President Trump? I'm gonna tee up some of my favorite, but I'm interested in your take on what the main highlights and takeaways were from his address, which went for about an hour.
- [05:50]
Mary Margaret Olihan
Yes, it was very long. And as usual, the president did the weave where he kind of weaves in and out of stories and comes back to his original point. Like I said, he mentioned that he knew exactly what the chandeliers were made out of. He kind of wanted to borrow them for the White House. He talked at length about the last dinner and how he was very glad that we could do it again. He praised Weijiajiang. He praised Jackie Heinrich. He did joke that Jackie can be kind of mean to him sometimes. And he joked about her husband who is a congressman from Pennsylvania. But on the whole, he was generally pretty nice to the White House Correspondents Board. Then he lit into some specific people. And I think the most notable instance was when he criticized Kaitlan Collins. So she is a White House correspond for cnn. And he made a joke, which I've seen plenty of people make before, that Kaitlan Collins looks like Dylan Mulvaney, who is the obviously man who identifies as a woman who is trying to model in many cases. It's gotten a lot of support from a lot of controversial brands. I believe was a big problem for Bud Light when they promoted him. So there's plenty of memes out there now. And he did make this joke about Kaitlan Collins looking like Dylan Mulvaney after she received her.
- [07:04]
Cabot Phillips
How did that go over?
- [07:07]
Mary Margaret Olihan
It was interesting. I think in the room. You gotta remember that Trump is playing for television. He's playing for America at large, but he's giving the speech in the room. So all of these reporters are sitting there processing this joke and most of them didn't like it because they all like Caitlin and they're all legacy and left leaning media. So I definitely chuckled and there are a few people at my table that did as well. But I was looking around and there were plenty of people looking at each other like, oh my gosh, I can't believe he said that.
- [07:35]
Cabot Phillips
Mary Margaret, we actually. Sorry to cut you off. They're telling me in my ear we actually have that clip pulled up. So if you wouldn't mind, let's go ahead and play. Let's show the people.
- [07:44]
Donald Trump (clip)
But I want to personally congratulate CNN's Kaitlyn Collins on receiving her award. It was all about me. It's a fake. She shouldn't get the award. It was a fake. But I didn't mind. I said, caitlin, congratulations. But it was fake. There's no question about it. But she's a young, attractive woman. She never smiles. I said, caitlin, do you have a smile? Smile. You have a nice position. You're at CNN fake news. You should be a happy person. So smile, Caitlin, just smile. But we attack. And I thought Caitlin had really made it big with a major new sponsorship. But then I informed her that it wasn't her on the Bud Light can, it was Dylan Mulvaney.
- [08:34]
Cabot Phillips
The thing that's so funny about that is if the left wants to get mad about that, they would have to explain why it's so offensive. Because they say, no, Dylan Mulvaney is a woman and she is beautiful.
- [08:44]
Mary Margaret Olihan
Right.
- [08:45]
Cabot Phillips
So why would it be offensive for Trump to compare her to a beautiful woman? It's kind of a smart joke in that regard. I can see why people might be a little offended in the room. I want to play an interesting clip here also where President Trump at one point they bring up and they honor some Wall Street Journal reporters who had done some stories very critical of the president. And those reporters came up on stage, they got raucous applause from the journalists in the room and Trump actually stood up and started congratulating them for their reporting on him. Let's play that CL. What did you make of that moment?
- [09:52]
Mary Margaret Olihan
So that was very interesting to watch. I think all eyes were watching that entire moment because, look, these are journalists who have reported very critically on the president. And you gotta hand it to him, the president certainly was gracious to these journalists who he definitely is not a big fan of, especially Josh Dossey there at the end. And you can kind of see that and how he jokingly throws his hands up and kind of acknowledges that he's not Josh d' Arcy's biggest fan. But look, there's very few people that would look their critics in the eye like that and shake their hand and congratulate them on an award or for reporting on him. So I found it to be an amusing moment and just one of many where the president basically, nicely one upped all of the media at this dinner who spend all of their time criticizing him. Look, the jokes about Kaitlan Collins not smiling enough, not particularly my favorite jokes. But the president takes it day in and day out. Many of these reporters make their living, make their entire living honestly, off of criticizing him, off of supposedly fact checking him. And so it was a really interesting moment where this is the man who everyone is talking about. He knows they're all talking about him. He knows they wouldn't be getting awards if he didn't exist. And I think he's kind of enjoying it.
- [11:06]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, it did seem like he was enjoying it. If everyone wants to see the full stream of that event Again, go to DailyWire.com, right in the Wired in feed. We have that full event. Mary Margaret, thank you for being there in the room, always giving us the scoop. We appreciate it.
- [11:22]
Mary Margaret Olihan
Thank you.
- [11:23]
Cabot Phillips
All right, let's get to another very important story that I think is not getting enough coverage. So one year ago, the United States Supreme Court affirmed once more that, quote, the First Amendment protects an individual's right to speak their mind, regardless of whether the government considers their speech sensible and well intentioned or deeply misguided and likely to cause anguish or incalculable grief. But prosecutors in Rochester, Minnesota, seem to have not gotten the memo. Last year, Shiloh Hendricks was at a public park with her toddler when an 8 year old boy allegedly rifled through her bag before running off. Hendricks allegedly chased after him, calling him the N word. When a bystander, Sharmaik Omar, confronted her on camera, Hendricks told him to mind his own business. He continued following her, saying, quote, why don't you have the balls to say it again? Hendricks then called him the N word as well. And after a brief exchange of words, Omar said, quote, we'll see what the Internet has to say about you. That video, which we're not going to play because there's a lot of bad language, obviously ends with Hendricks facing a flurry of death threats and harassment online. But it wasn't just the Internet who went after her. Soon, Rochester prosecutors charged her with three counts of disorderly conduct. Last week she was found guilty on one count and given a thousand dollar fine, 200 hours of community service and a stayed 90 day jail sentence. Here with more is best selling author, host and senior editor at Human events, Jack Posobec. Jack, it's great to have you back. A remarkable case here that sparked a wide range of opinions this week. What do you make of this conviction?
- [12:56]
Jack Posobec
It's really interesting because. And thanks for having me on again, Cabot. So the, the situation here was that in this case where you have the white mother, the Somalians involved, of course, Minnesota, because we can't seem to go through a week without finding something that comes up in Minnesota. She was accused of this disorderly conduct. That's what she was charged with. And while the prosecutors made a lot of mention of her, you know, kind of going after the child, there was, you know, the defense said, well, the child had stolen something from her, from her children. That's what she was going after. She was actually acquitted of disorderly conduct charge against the child. She was found guilty of a disorderly conduct charge against the TikTok streamer Sharmok Omar, which is interesting because there's no evidence that was presented in the trial whatsoever of any quote, unquote aggressive conduct towards the streamer or what would amount to what under the Minnesota statute calls for, which is fighting words, so saying, you know, I'm gonna beat you up, that kind of thing, like a, like a threat to a fight. So what really seems to have happened here is that the one conviction that she received was specifically for using a certain word. And look, I personally don't use that kind of language. I think it's rude. I don't teach my kids to speak like that. But at the same time, do we really want to be the kind of country like the United Kingdom where I just came from, I was there speaking last time I was on with you, where 13,000 people a year, a year are arrested for speech offenses. Cuz that's where this leads.
- [14:36]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, and as you said, I don't think the people defending Hendricks legally are saying we should all go around using language like this. Of course that's not what we're saying. The point is at a certain time, the slope is actually slippery. And when you start prosecuting people for words they're using, where is the end of it? And so I'm interested in a take that you had on this story where you said that Hendrix in particular was ultimately convicted of being white. What do you mean by that?
- [15:03]
Jack Posobec
Well, I was convicted because you can. By the way, you can see the speech being used by the streamer here by the Somalian. You can hear that particular word being used by all sorts of people on. You could turn on any rap station and listen to it, or, you know, listen to any top 40 rap song and hear it. But in this case, we see an incentive structure that is set up in such a way where the system went after this mother because she was white and because she broke that transgression. Again, the jury ruled that way specifically because this was a white. If this had been a black person, a black mother, this case never would have been brought. This charges never would have been brought, and these. This conviction never would have happened. We probably wouldn't have even heard of her. But because it was a white and black situation, now the entire thing took off, and we've gone all the way to the point where. And I want to be clear about this, she's got $1,000 fine, $200 community service, supervised probation, and a stayed 90 day. 90 day jail time. 90 days. So if she breaks probation or breaks one of the limits that's been stipulated on her, she could go to jail for saying a word in the United States of America.
- [16:16]
Cabot Phillips
Jack, as you've discussed, according to court documents, the judge in this case instructed jurors to take into account their own, quote, implicit bias while they were deciding a verdict, but there was no instruction given directly on First Amendment protections. What do you make of that? Where the judge is stepping and telling people, hey, before you come up with a ruling, you guys need to all examine your implicit biases?
- [16:40]
Jack Posobec
Well, look, I mean, this is something that President Trump certainly knows about. When you look at judges now, he is more familiar, of course, with the New York system, but they're just Bolsheviks. That's just a communist judge who's putting the thumb on the scale and getting conviction that they want. What you're gonna see here is, of course, if this isn't thrown out on appeal at the appellate level, it certainly should be at the Minnesota Supreme Court level, and if need be, at the federal level, because, again, this just flies in the face of the First Amendment. The fact that the jury was not even given a instruction on the First Amendment just shows you right there that procedurally, this case was not tried properly. Now, if they're able to do so, perhaps they could try to retry the case or order a retrial or something like that. But honest, entire thing should be thrown out on First Amendment grounds and probably that that law itself should be declared unconstitutional, because, again, you cannot convict people just for words in the United States of America.
- [17:39]
Cabot Phillips
It's worth noting here as well, Jack, that the man who took this video, Shermack Omar, Somali man, he was arrested back in 2022. He was charged with sexually assaulting an underage girl. Prosecutors ultimately dropped that case. In their words, in the pursuit or in the interest of justice, there was very compelling evidence that he was guilty, but again, they dropped the case. What does it say about the justice system in Minnesota, in America more broadly, that offensive words can lead to a conviction, but an apparent sexual assault of a minor does not?
- [18:12]
Jack Posobec
Yeah, and it sounds like in that case, again, just reading between the tea leaves, it sounds like that the victim probably didn't want to go forward with the charges. This is unfortunately something that happens a lot in sexual assault cases where they don't want to be re victimized. And so the case isn't able to go forward the way that we all know it should. This is obviously a deficit of the system. And this is par for the course when it comes to Minnesota. For whatever reason, the communists have dug in in Minnesota. This goes all the way back to George Floyd. It goes to everything that we saw in the ice crackdown on, you know, the beginning of 2026. And it shows us that if they can do this to the American Midwest, if they can do this in Minnesota, they will use that as a test bed to do it everywhere else. And so you see this incentive structure that's been perverted, where you've got streamers, you' got Somali migrants, you've got the naacp, which, by the way, came in and represented the father in this case, who the father apparently contacted before he even contacted the police. And you've got a justice system that is willing to play along. What does this mean? It's going to happen again?
- [19:17]
Cabot Phillips
We haven't seen a ton of support for Hendricks. We've seen some folks online that have raised money for legal fees and relocation fees because of the death threats that she was facing. And we have seen some groups like Fire step forward and say, hey, this is a violation of the First Amendment, whatever you think of this language. But I've seen very few lawmakers come forward and defend Hendricks, or at least defend the First Amendment. Why is that?
- [19:44]
Jack Posobec
Well, look, from a political perspective, there are gonna be people who say, hey, I'm gonna get beat up by saying that I associate with someone who would use the N word. And I understand that from a pragmatic perspective, but at the same time. And I do congratulate Elon Musk for coming out and saying this, because, again, this isn't about what word was used. This is about, do we defend freedom of speech in its totality in the way that the ACLU used to, by the way, back in the day? Because it's about defending that same speech for you, for me, for everyone. Because when these tyrants get in power, and they will yet again, unfortunately, at some point, they will then come up with a list of. Of words that you can and cannot say. And if you say one of them or are accused of saying one of them, you could potentially go to jail. That's what this is about.
- [20:38]
Cabot Phillips
Before we go, just one final thing I'd love to hear you elaborate on. You say that this is kind of a testing ground for cracking down on speech. What sort of other threats do you see coming out of this if this ruling is allowed to stand?
- [20:53]
Jack Posobec
Well, you're going to see threats where what's going to happen is that you'll have a perverse incentive structure. Well, you will have tiktokers working to provoke these kinds of situations from happening. Now, of course, we know that this is already kind of a genre on TikTok where you see, like, black teens or kids will run up with, like, riding a wheelie or we saw the knockout game not long ago. But what you'll see is you'll find people trying to trick people or provoke people or whatever it is, get them to say the N word, then film it and then try to run to the end of ACP in press charges. This is absolutely something that's gonna continue. It's not just going to happen in Minnesota. We're gonna see more of this.
- [21:30]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah. And I think it's another example of why it is so important to defend all speech, even gross speech, that you wouldn't use yourself. The point of the First Amendment is that we protect all people's speech. Because eventually.
- [21:42]
Jack Posobec
Well, I remember when there were leftists who were celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk and were cheering and parading about that. And so you've got leftists who are upset about a mom saying a word, have, you know, have to dodge bullets and people are getting shot at. But I don't recall ever calling or anyone on the right calling for anyone to be jailed or arrested or anything like that, because that's just not who we are as Americans.
- [22:10]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, a very important point, and we'll end on that. Jack Vasovic, always a pleasure to have you on, man. Thanks for being here.
- [22:16]
Jack Posobec
Appreciate you. God bless.
- [22:18]
Cabot Phillips
Well, this weekend a 21 year old Muslim man in Berlin intentionally drove his car through a pride parade, killing one woman and injuring at least 29 others before being killed by police. And then just a day later In Paris, a 31 year old man stabbed three women, one of whom was pregnant, while reportedly shouting that Allah had ordered him to do so. Authorities say the attacks appear to be unrelated, but they are just the latest example of violent Islamic terror across Europe. Here with more is Bev Turner, host of the Late show live on GB News. Bev, great to have you back. Thanks for being here.
- [22:53]
Bev Turner
Thanks for having me.
- [22:55]
Cabot Phillips
It seems every week now that we're getting reports of an Islamic terror attack somewhere in Europe. Just first question, how do we get to this point? How do we get here?
- [23:06]
Bev Turner
If you all remember, back in 2015, Angela Merkel was leading Germany at the time and we were in the midst of a huge European migrant crisis. And she uttered a phrase which has actually been misquoted over the years along the lines of everyone is welcome. That's not actually what she said. She said in German, she said, we can manage this, but what happened was a million refugees, asylum seekers, migrants went into Germany in 12 months. And so we're on from that now and we're realizing that actually we're paying the price now, it seems. Sorry, my phone. Sorry, sorry, I'm preparing for my show tonight. My phone just went off. We're 10 years on, obviously, and we're realizing that there have so many instances of terrorist attacks like this. So in 2016 in Germany, there was an attack on a market, if you remember, in Berlin and 12 people were killed. On that occasion. There were, there have been 26 people killed in Germany in total with Islamic attacks. And these are the ones that have been thwarted. Obviously there are so many that weren't thwarted. So there's so many behind the scenes that happen every single day across Europe. And it's because we've had this huge influx of people from Islamic countries and we're now paying the price for that.
- [24:36]
Cabot Phillips
Now, the terrorist in this Berlin attack was already a known terror threat. He was previously busted literally trying to join isis. He was flown back to Germany, he was given a one year prison sentence and instead of a longer prison stay, the court said, well, let's have him take classroom sessions and maybe this would de radicalize him. Obviously that did not work. So how do we have a system where a guy like this is even allowed on the street when a year ago he was openly trying to join isis?
- [25:05]
Bev Turner
And that's because he was treated as a juvenile. So amazingly, in Germany you can be a juvenile up to the age of 21. And when he tried to join ISIS, he was 20. Obviously he's carried out this attack now being, being 21 and will be handled quite differently. But we have this problem in the UK as well, which is at what point do you start to treat these individuals not just as a junior with a juvenile with a mental health condition, but as somebody that has been radicalized. Now, in the case of this guy, Abdul Balout, he'd been to join isis. Like if you don't need any more evidence that he was driven by an ideology than that, I can't help you. We've seen in France particularly has had much worse. France has been the worst actually for terrorist attacks. If you remember, there was the attack on the Charlie Hebdo, it was known as the Charlie Hebdo massacre. And that was in 2015. And there were 17 people that were killed on that occasion. That was because a magazine, this Charlie Hebdo magazine, dared to print a cartoon which Islamist found offensive and the building was stormed. And if you remember, there was a campaign that was I stand with Charlie. And that was meant to send out a very powerful message that people weren't going to be kowtowed by Islamist terrorism in Europe. But we still are. It hasn't changed enough. The Europe is now waking up. The EU just recently passed a new piece of legislation. I was on the daily wire in fact, talking about it, because they've brought in what they're calling a new migration pact whereby all of these countries are saying, enough. We cannot cope anymore with bringing people who've often been brutalized, maybe come from war zones themselves, have committed or witnessed extreme acts of violence. And we can't do that anymore. And so there will be tighter regulations around this. But so many of these people are still there. Interestingly, actually this guy was German born and bred, his parents were Lebanese. But we've seen that quite a lot across Europe. It's increasingly the second generation of migrants who were seen committing these atrocities. The Manchester arena attack in 2017 was, if you remember, the Ariana Grande concert in Manchester. That was a guy called Salman Abedi who'd been born in the UK to Libyan refugee parents. There's a London Bridge attacker, that was in 2017, and there were three attackers there, one of them Pakistani born, British citizen, a Moroccan born Italian national, Moroccan born man living in the UK. And then in Westminster in 2017, there was a guy called Khalid Masoud who was a British convert to Islam. British born, convert to Islam. So these aren't necessarily illegal asylum seekers. They're quite often, fascinatingly, I think psychologically, the second generation born into a country and maybe not fitting anywhere, not being part of the culture from which they've come, but also not feeling British either. And therein lies the anger, the dissatisfaction, and then awful atrocities like this happen. But it's dreadful in Europe at the moment.
- [28:22]
Cabot Phillips
And you have all of that on top of the radicalizing influence of Islam itself, which of course is playing a role as well. And you mentioned the, the number of attacks being carried out by second generation migrants. That's similar to what we saw in this British rape gang inquiry which you've talked about on the show, how there were hundreds of thousands of British women and girls who were victimized by these rape gangs, many of them from migrants in Muslim countries or second generation migrants. Last we talked, that story had blown up in the United States. It wasn't getting as much attention in the uk. Has that report led to any significant reforms in the uk?
- [29:02]
Bev Turner
No, not at all. Of course not. And I think it's worth pointing out as well because it's interesting that you mentioned about the Pakistani origin of those men. That's significant because so many of these terrorist attacks are carried out by individuals from countries who wouldn't Islamic, Islamic, as opposed to Islamists, Islamic countries that wouldn't have them in their own country. So Qatar, Saudi Arabia, like the Gulf states, they've clamped down on this kind of radicalism. They don't tolerate it, they don't accept it, they lock these guys up or worse, whereas we don't treat them with the same high standards. So some of the Gulf states are looking at us and saying, well, you took that many Pakistani men who have come from a different culture with a different misogynistic view of women. I'm so sorry, but that's not on us. That isn't an Islamic problem, let's say from across the world. That is specifically from that particular country and a culture. And we have to get better, I think, at working out how we discuss the difference between religious expectations, cultural norms, ideologies, and how we talk about bringing people into Europe and expecting them to assimilate because that has been stigmatized for so many years now. That has been taboo in the uk. The worst thing you can be called is racist or Islamophobic. And so because of that stigma of suddenly being told that you are this awful label, which is awful. But of course, most people who raise their hand and say, I have some serious questions about the benefits of mass migration and what that might mean for our young people. Our women, in the case of Berlin, are gay people who are celebrating Pride. Anybody that says that has been roundly drawn gasps of shock from onlookers and said, well, they're just racist. They're just Islamophobic. This Berlin case actually fascinatingly gave rise to a quote from an mp, a tweet from an MP who actually blamed. I want to tell you what she said, because it's worth reading it. She blamed the Reform Party and GB News for language and attacks that vilify the LGBTQ community and blaming them for the attack on Berlin Pride. So we see these patterns emerging across Europe, and that Kate Osborne mp, who tweeted that, you just want to say, no, we are not the reason. GB News is not the reason that a crazy Islamist drives into people at a Pride event in Berlin. Let that person take some responsibility. Let elements of the Muslim religion take some responsibility. But it feels like those on the left are very quick to blame the political right in the UK when an awful, awful tragedy like this happens.
- [31:59]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah. I would say that in any other scenario, that would be called victim blaming, to put the blame on those who are angry about what's happened to their people, to their culture, to their country, and say, this is your fault. It's a form of gaslighting as well. We're not gonna fall for it, though. I'm glad that you're speaking out against it, Bev. It's always great to have you on. We really appreciate your commentary. You're welcome anytime. Thank you.
- [32:22]
Bev Turner
Thank you.
- [32:23]
Cabot Phillips
That was Bev Turner from GB News. Guys, if you're watching Wired in live on the Daily Wire plus app, thank you. If not, that's where you should be. That's where you get push alerts when we go live. Breaking news as it happens, and of course, the latest SMAR investigative reporting team. The Daily Wire plus app is free and available now on the App Store. Google Play, Apple tv, Roku, Samsung LG and more. All right, let's get down to Texas, where we've got Daily Wire immigration reporter Jenny Terre standing by. Jenny, howdy. Great to have you back.
- [32:56]
Jenny Terre
Howdy. Thanks for having me.
- [32:58]
Cabot Phillips
I've been waiting to say howdy on this show, and I got a Texan I'm talking to, so I'm taking advantage of it. Okay, let's start, but with President Trump and his deportation agenda. We know that under President Biden, more than 300,000 Haitian migrants were given temporary protected status. Trump intervened, terminated those protections, and as of today, actually, their legal status has expired. So how is ICE responding now that we have hundreds of thousands, potentially of Haitian migrants who no longer are legally here?
- [33:29]
Jenny Terre
So far, the message from ICE has been for those illegal migrants now from Haiti to pack their bags and to leave before ICE catches up to them. Because those officers now across the country are being instructed to prioritize the arrests and deportations of Haitian migrants who now no longer have protections from deportation as part of tps, which was that program that now is no longer in place for them because the Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in trying to revoke their status.
- [34:04]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, and as you mentioned, President Trump, when he issued that verdict, saying, hey, your TPS status is gone. Federal courts tried to intervene and say, no, you can't do that. The Supreme Court said, actually, yes, the president does have that power. So where are these ICE agents going in particular? Are there any particular states or cities where they know that there are a lot of these Haitians?
- [34:26]
Jenny Terre
There are reports that ICE is being told to focus on states like Ohio, which, of course, we all heard about. Springfield, Ohio. That was that small town that was inundated with about 20,000 migrants from Haiti during the Biden administration. That became a focal point of the campaign, the presidential campaign at the time, which we know immigration was a top concern for voters, especially ones who wanted Trump in power. And so, yes, they're being told to go to places like that to prioritize Haitian migrants who are in those areas.
- [35:00]
Tim Rice
Now.
- [35:01]
Jenny Terre
One other thing that I should mention is that these migrants, yes, they had their TPS revoked, but many of them will have to go in front of an immigration judge and actually get a formal deportation order, which will allow ICE to then remove them from the country. So it does take a little bit of time. Immigration is always complicated, so there's always more layers to these stories.
- [35:23]
Cabot Phillips
Forgive my ignorance on this, but why would the Haitian migrants go to court if they knew that they might get a deportation order? Wouldn't they just avoid doing that?
- [35:35]
Jenny Terre
Yeah, it's possible. In a lot of cases like that, you do see migrants who know that they don't have a legitimate asylum claim or a case for asylum, that they won't show up to court. That's why the Trump administration is saying, why don't you just get ahead of us and self deport? But, yes, there is also a very unlikely chance right now in immigration courts that migrants will get asylum, particularly these Haitian migrants, because the Trump administration has fired over 100 immigration judges who were known to side more with these migrants in asylum cases. Trump ditched them, put in some new immigration hawk judges. And so the courts are just a different place than they were under the Biden administration.
- [36:21]
Cabot Phillips
That's a fascinating angle. Jenny, you've got another piece up on the Daily Wire as well where you bring some clarity on a story that got a lot of attention and fueled an anti ICE hunger strike up in New Jersey. Tell us what you've learned.
- [36:36]
Jenny Terre
Yeah, another narrative that's just fallen apart. I mean, it's very similar to what we saw when Kilmar Brego Garcia's story came to light and he was. Was tagged as this Maryland man. And then we learned all about what actually was going on behind the scenes. This story is about Martin Soto. He was the migrant who was leading the hunger strike behind the walls of the deport or the detention facility. The ICE Detention center in Newark, Delaney hall, that became a huge area in the end of May June where anti ICE protesters were gathering. Mostly in a lot of times, they were led by his wife, who was claiming that he was completely innocent, that ICE picked him up when he was trying to get diapers for their child. Well, we obtained a police report, and it looks like that narrative is falling apart because actually, the day she says that ICE picked him up while he was buying those diapers, it turns out that Kearney police in New Jersey actually arrested him that day on a domestic assault charge. And the details are gruesome. He allegedly put his hands on the unnamed victim's face. He gave her scars on her face, covered her mouth so she couldn't scream for help. We don't know who that victim was, but again, it was a domestic assault. Now, we know that this person was the center of all of this chaos within the facility. We know that it led to allegations of. Of inhumane conditions inside. His wife was saying that she was under so much stress having to protest for his release that she was going to miscarry their child at the time. And it became this huge narrative that the media ran with without asking any questions. But it turns out he was actually arrested for this domestic assault, like I said. And then what happened was ICE came to the jail the next day and took him into custody.
- [38:31]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah, well, you said that very few people are asking the important questions in the legacy press. We are glad that you are asking those questions. Jenny, thank you as always for your fantastic reporting on immigration over at Daily Wire. It's great to have you on.
- [38:47]
Jenny Terre
Thank you.
- [38:48]
Cabot Phillips
That was Jenny Terre Daily Wire IMMIGRATION REPORTER all right, I've been excited to get to this story. All right, so get this. As part of his investigation into the origins of COVID and the alleged cover up afterwards, over the weekend, Senator Rand Paul published a series of entries from the private journal, or diary, whatever you want to call it, of Dr. Anthony Fauci. We got his journal. Among other things, it shows a man gushing about his newfound fame, a man recording each new glowing profile written about him, a man gleefully referring to himself as the most famous man in the world. Here with more is Bhatia Ungar Sargon, author and host of Bhatia on News Nation. Bhatia, it's great to have you back.
- [39:31]
Bhatia Ungar Sargon
Thank you so much for having me. Great to be here with you.
- [39:34]
Cabot Phillips
So we've all been feverishly reading through these journal entries. What stood out to you the most from this document dub?
- [39:43]
Bhatia Ungar Sargon
Well, I myself had asked Anthony Fauci the one time I got to interview him in 2023 if he did not regret recommending school closures. At that point, we already knew how not endangered from COVID children were and yet how much harm the school closures was causing children, especially disadvantaged children, children in blue cities and blue states who didn't have access to schools as opposed to kids in red states where they did have access to them. We could see at that point that there was no difference in the child mortality due to Covid than God, but a huge difference in learning loss. So I asked Dr. Fauci, do you regret recommending closing down the schools? And he said to me, well, I never recommended closing down the schools. This was the cdc, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Well, wouldn't you know it, there is an entry in his diary bragging about how he convinced Bill de Blasio and Gavin Newsom to close the schools in California and New York. And there are just so many examples of this, of him saying one thing in private and another thing in public. He recorded in his diary early in 2020 that he was pretty convinced by the lab leak theory and then of course went on to force scientists to say, no, it was the wet market, blah, blah, blah, because of course, he knew that if we knew that it was a lab leak, that he would bear some responsibility because he had been the chief proponent of gain of function research. But in addition to all of this, the lies he told Congress, the lies he told the American, how dangerous he thought Covid was. So in his diary, he says it's 2.3 mortality and then went and told the American people, something he already knew wasn't true, that it was ten times more dangerous than the average flu. We all know the costs that were borne by the American people for all of these lies. But the real take home message is the vain, glorious obsession with himself and celebrities he records in his diary every time some famous person calls him. He spent a lot of time with Jake Tapper. He fed him questions to ask to Trump appointees. I mean, just how embedded he was with the glitterati in the media Barbra Streisand would call him. I mean, it was just. But also, and again, this is not just like the gross nature of people on the left, the access that the rich and the famous had to therapeutics and testing, et cetera, because of this vainglorious nature of Dr. Fauci.
- [42:34]
Cabot Phillips
That was a heck of an answer.
- [42:36]
Donald Trump (clip)
I love.
- [42:37]
Cabot Phillips
That's why we bring you on Bhatia. Woo. I'm fired up. Okay. I think you deserve a little bit of a victory lap for pressing Dr. Fauci and saying, hey, do you think maybe it shouldn't have shut the schools down? And I just want to play that clip for our audience so they can see for themselves how he responds.
- [42:56]
Bhatia Ungar Sargon
I wonder if you would recommend locking down schools if you had to do it all over again.
- [43:01]
Cabot Phillips
Well, you know, again, it's. First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down.
- [43:06]
Jack Posobec
You're asking me questions.
- [43:07]
Cabot Phillips
You're talking about the CDC is the
- [43:10]
Jack Posobec
public health agency that uses their epidemiologists
- [43:13]
Cabot Phillips
and their science based approach to make recommendations. He's almost laughing at you. He's saying, I can't believe that you would accuse me of doing that. And then you see, as you mentioned, you see in his journal, he writes and says, yes, you know, Governor or Mayor de Blasio said that the only reason he locked down schools is because of what I said on the news. And I spoke with Gavin Newsom's chief of staff and they said they were taking my guidance to shut down the schools. He's bragging about it privately and then publicly when called on it, he tries to obfuscate and say, no, no, I didn't actually do that. And I want to get back to something you talked about. And this was Fauci's cozy relationship with many in the media, with Jake Tapper, who he was hanging out with one on one, despite his calls to not spend time with personal friends and loved ones. And then with, I believe it was Dana Bash at CNN where he was talking about with her and she was saying, hey, I Heard a great thing about how you really gave it to Jim Jordan and those Republicans and they were tripping over their own. You know what's trying to question you. Great job on that. What does that tell us about the relationship between someone like Dr. Fauci and the legacy president press?
- [44:21]
Bhatia Ungar Sargon
Again, it just how the legacy press like Dr. Fauci pretend to be nonpartisan, pretend to be objective, pretend to be for all Americans, and yet they are all nakedly partisan. The medical establishment just absolutely cratered incredibility because it was the politicization of what should have been knowledge, information, facts, science, trust the science, which meant trust the Democrats who were screwing over children, screwing over the elderly, and screwing over the working class because they thought it would hurt Trump. I mean, it's so disgusting. I mean, this was the thing that always stuck with me was the richest people in America were sitting in their beautiful homes forcing working class people to service them, to brave the plague, to bring them their groceries, okay? Because. Because we couldn't have shut down if you didn't have servants to bring you groceries. So working class people had to keep working. But in their leisure time, God forbid there be a restaurant open where they can take their children. No, in your leisure time, you will sit at home and you're not allowed to go to church, Right? It was just the dressing up of economic privilege as virtue because of course, if you push back, you were a grandma killer. And we knew within six months that it was all BS because Florida wasn't doing any of it. We knew almost immediately that it was all political garbage and political theater. And I just. This guy Fauci, the damage he has done. Because of course now you have people who don't wanna give their kids the measles shot because they just don't trust anything coming out of the medical establishment. And why should they? They look at someone like Fauci, who just had enormous contempt for the average person. Another question I asked him during that interview was why was natural immunity never considered as part of the way to fight Covid? Why was that never taken into account? Natural immunity, of course, turned out to be just as strong, if not stronger than the vaccine. But they always treated it like it was garbage because they wanted to enforce their way of doing things, which was the Democrats way of doing things. So of course people now have nothing but contempt for the medical establishment. And children are going to die because of that. They're not gonna get the measles shot. And they will die because of what these Democrats did in politicizing. What should Be a completely nonpartisan sector. The health sector, the medical profession, the entire industry, the medical industry.
- [47:03]
Cabot Phillips
Before we go, there are people, I'm sure I read comments sections and I see the discourse around stories like this. And there are a lot of people who say, can we just move on from COVID Why are we still talking about this? I would like to never have to hear the name Anthony Fauci again. Why are we still going on about this? Why does this story still matter?
- [47:26]
Bhatia Ungar Sargon
You know, I have to say I'm not sure it does. Like, they could be right. You know, if somebody right now is deciding, like what to think about, I don't know that I would tell them like, this is the number one story. I do think the learning loss in terms of how that impacted a generation of young people is a really big deal. It was criminal and nobody ever paid for it. But I do think it's one of those stories that we in the elites who Fauci lied to our faces, we care about this a lot more, I think, than the average person who has sort of figured out where they stand on this and is kind of ready to move on.
- [48:04]
Cabot Phillips
Speak for yourself, Bhatia. I am not an elite. I am a good old Tennessee boy with my cowboy boots. I was catfishing all weekend. I'm a good old boy. Bhatia. I'll throw my answer in then. I would say this story does still matter because I think the American people need to know that everything they hear from the government is not always as it seems. They need to know that the old adage of trust the experts, you should be able to trust the experts, but that the experts do oftentimes have ulterior motives that they will lie to you. And I think it's important for people to hopefully have the scales lifted in a certain way when it comes to what the government will do for power and how hungry they are for power. And hopefully we can rebuild those trusts, hopefully the institutions. You want a society when people can trust their institutions. That's a bad thing. That's corrosive when it's not the case. But I think, I think building back that trust first comes with transparency. So I would say that is why it still matters to me. But yeah, I'm convinced I'm half of an elite. You can be the full blooded elite. Bhatia. We always love getting to have you on. Thank you so much.
- [49:12]
Bev Turner
Thanks for having me.
- [49:13]
Bhatia Ungar Sargon
God bless.
- [49:14]
Cabot Phillips
Go watch Bhatia and go read all of her work as well. Bhatia Ungar Sargon. And give Her a follow on social media as well. Well, let's get back to Washington where we've got a man that I will not encourage any of you to follow because some of you can't handle the heat that comes on his Twitter account. It's Daily Wire DC Bureau Chief Tim Rice. Tim, how we doing, my friend?
- [49:37]
Tim Rice
I'm feeling great, Cabot. I would like to say I like to consider myself an elite. I don't think the elites want me, but I'm not going to let that stop me from being an elite.
- [49:49]
Cabot Phillips
You know, what is elite about you? Your facial hair.
- [49:52]
Bev Turner
Game
- [49:54]
Tim Rice
Boy.
- [49:55]
Gaelic Football Announcer
Thank you.
- [49:55]
Tim Rice
Thank you so much.
- [49:56]
Cabot Phillips
An elite mustache if I've ever seen one. Let's get to some elite political takes, which is why we bring you on. We are now less than 100 days from the midterms. You're on Capitol Hill constantly. What is the mood on the GOP side right now about how things are shaking out?
- [50:15]
Tim Rice
Yeah, that's right, Cabot. So 99 days until the midterm elections. A lot of our viewers might have seen a couple of polls that came out today which, including the Decision Desk HQ poll which says that as of right now, it looks like Democrats are going to win the House of representatives, have a 15 seat majority and that Republicans are going to keep a 5050 majority in the Senate because of course, Vice President J.D. vance would be the tiebreaker now. Now that is what the polls say. Two things to note there. One is that obviously these things can change. There is a lot of ground game left, a lot of primaries still to be decided on the Democrat side. We still don't know, for instance, who is going to be the Democrat nominee in Michigan or in Missouri, two of the biggest races. But the other thing that I will note, and to actually answer your question, is that the Republican mood on the Hill is pretty good. Folks that I've talked to are relatively confident that Republicans are going to maintain their hold on the Hill. Now, of course, there's a caveat here, which is that of course that's what professional Republican operatives are going to say to a journalist when talking about the midterms. But I do think that there is something real there. I think that there is optimism. I think that Republicans have, they know that, for instance, they have way more cash on hand than Democrats. Democrats, in fact, have $2 million in debt and no cash on hand. The DNC is faltering, as we saw with that big New York Times story over the weekend end. Democrats keep nominating and putting forward radical leftist candidates and Republicans are doing well. They've been doing well in the polls. They've been doing well in primaries. There's been relatively little infighting since the Texas Senate primary was decided on the GOP side. So without, again, with all the caveats in place, I think that Republicans are pretty happy about where things stand and I think they have pretty good reason to be.
- [52:04]
Cabot Phillips
Yeah. Some of the Republicans that I've spoken to, they say, hey, hey, we would be in a horrific political environment if it were not for the Democrats getting in their own way and electing these socialist candidates. And even in states where there are more moderate Democrats who are coming out as the nominee, still, the general vibe of the left right now, it is dominated by these radical socialists. And I saw an interesting poll that came out where among Democrat voters, the word socialism has a 52% favorability rating. Among independents, it is 60 points underwater. It's got a 16% approval rating and it's 76% disapproval. And so I think that that is going to play a huge role. What are you hearing on that front when it comes to how Republicans are going to try to weaponize that issue of socialism against the left?
- [52:54]
Tim Rice
No, it's a great question. I mean, and that poll is just the latest and maybe the most empirical backing of what we've been seeing. Right. Which is that America people, you know, political journalists, love to use the phrase real Americans. I am, I am going to use that term advisedly and without the baggage. I just mean people who do not work for the Democratic Party. Right. Anyone who is not in a, like someone who is not paid by Ken Martin and the DNC to to say that socialism is a good thing. I think for the most part thinks that there's of course, the word as a negative connotation. And this is how Republicans have been running the midterms. This is how they're going to continue to run the midterms. We've seen they've tried, Republicans have tried to make Zoran Mamdani the new avatar of the Democratic Party. And this gets to the next the really important point here and goes back to what you were saying about Democrats getting in their own way, which is that Republicans don't need to work that hard. Right. Zoran Mamdadi was barely in office a couple of months when he was endorsing congressional candidates all across the country and basically saying, I am the future of the Democratic Party. Abdul Al Said, who is locked in the Michigan primary against Congresswoman Haley Stevens. They have their final Democratic debate tonight at 7:30 Eastern. I believe he over the weekend, there was a leaked campaign call where he was talking about how we need to put an ogre on a pike or on a stick, apparently referring to Haley Stevens, but more generally just referring to these people, Democrats, who he sees as insufficiently centrist. He specifically name checked Senator John Fetterman and said that he would support a primary challenge to everyone's favorite Democratic senator from Pennsylvania. This guy hasn't even, not only is he not in Congress, he hasn't even gotten the Democratic nomination yet. And it is not, not a foregone conclusion that he's going to, to get it. And he's already telling people, well, after we win, we can get Fetterman out of the Senate. We can get these people out of here. So the people the Democrats are putting forward not only have this unabashed embrace of socialism, they also have, I think, way overestimated their own power and their own influence. So again, Republicans, the messaging is there for them. It's not even like they're overextending. They are truly just shining a light on what these Democrat candidates are saying themselves and the, the run up to the midterms.
- [55:11]
Cabot Phillips
Tim there was a very interesting sort of proxy war that happened with the Democrats this past weekend where they were picking the order of the presidential caucuses and primaries for 2028. The progressive wing of the party wanted New Hampshire to be the first state on the calendar, saying, hey, this is going to be where you've got some of these more radical far left people. This is what the base wants. This is what young people want. Make New Hampshire the first state because it's more likely that a far left candidate wins. They get the momentum of winning the first primary and then they're off to the races. It seems like the more establishment wing of the party wanted South Carolina to be the first state because there are many more black voters there. Black voters are less likely to support these fringy socialist candidates. So it makes it more likely that a traditional establishment Democrat wins. They ended up going with South Carolina. That's going to be the first state on their calendar in 2028. How much should we read into that decision about what it says with what the establishment of the left wants?
- [56:06]
Tim Rice
That's a really fantastic question. And not to immediately throw cold water on it, my answer is I don't think that much. New Hampshire and South Carolina, both parties, but specifically Democrats, have been fighting over the primary order for about a decade now. New Hampshire and South Carolina are two of the biggest primary. They're usually two of the earliest primaries. This is something that they want. Now usually the state parties fight over this because they want to be the first, right? They want the inflog, they want the first primary. All the candidates come, right, but people haven't dropped out. All the media's there, people fly in. That means people spending money at restaurants, it means national news attention, it means relevance for the respective party officials in each state. So on the one hand, I wouldn't read too much into the choice because this is a fight that's been going on for a long time. It's kind of just a traditional intra Democratic party fight. And I really think what it might mean, it might just come down to the fact that the South Carolina delegation had more sway and pulled out the final victory. That said, I think we should be reading into the fact that this year in particular, the ideological component did color the conversation, right? Because usually this is a thing that again, Republicans do it too. We're just talking about Democrats now. State parties that are behind major primaries, they're pretty unabashed about we want to be the first because we want to be the most relevant, we want to be the most important, we want to be the big show, which is fine. It's not an embarrassing thing. It's a super reasonable thing for a state party to want to do. The fact that certain elements of the Democratic Party are saying no, it has to be South Carolina first, because if it's New Hampshire first, it's going to set this entire cycle off on a kind of left footed note is very interesting. And again, I look forward to seeing specifically in the coming days who exactly was making that argument. Because of course South Carolina Democrats are going to marshal that argument just to keep their state as the first primary. But if we see that it's more and more folks at the dnc, the dccc, the dscc, the party machinery that are pushing to keep South Carolina first, to sort of keep the woke elements of the party at bay. That is a tell of what we already suspect, which is that the more establishment elements of the party are really panicked about what the fringes of their party are going to do for 2028.
- [58:31]
Cabot Phillips
Tim, well said. And you left yourself two minutes before the show ends, which gives me time to play one of the greatest videos that I've ever seen. You don't know what I'm about to play one of the greatest videos I've ever seen. We can agree now that the US Is out of the World cup, now that the World cup is over, we can agree that Soccer does still in fact sucked, even though it was fun in the moment. But I found a version of soccer that absolutely rocks. It is Gaelic football over in Ireland and they had this team, Mayo in Ireland, which had not won the Gaelic Football cup or whatever it's called in 75 years. And they just won. And listen to the local announcers as the game winning goal is scored.
- [59:17]
Gaelic Football Announcer
He's got Tommy. Oh, my God. He said it over the top. Oh, my God. Delirium. Delirium.
- [59:28]
Tim Rice
They have to get a go.
- [59:30]
Gaelic Football Announcer
It's over. The 30 seconds. It's five seconds. Oh, shit. Thank you, referee.
- [59:38]
Mary Margaret Olihan
The famine.
- [59:40]
Gaelic Football Announcer
Yes. The famine is over. The famine is over. The Caspian hit the nuclear button. They have won the on island. It's coming. It's coming.
- [59:54]
Donald Trump (clip)
I love.
- [59:55]
Cabot Phillips
I don't even know what this is.
- [59:58]
Tim Rice
The nuclear button.
- [59:59]
Cabot Phillips
Hit the nuclear button. The curse is over. The curse is over. I just love when announcers are so excited that they completely lose their announcer voice and they just sound like little kids. I went down a rabbit hole, Tim. I was looking up Gaelic football. Fun fact. There were 83,000 people, 83,000 people in that stadium. It's a hugely popular sport in Ireland. It's an amateur league. The players are not paid. They don't make any money for being so. These are national heroes, icons, and they don't make any money. It's an amateur sport, which I thought was the coolest thing. These guys are literally plumbers and accountants and restaurant workers, whatever, who just are international stars or national stars, at least in Ireland now. They're international. Am I right? Was that the coolest clip?
- [60:43]
Tim Rice
No, that was the coolest club ever. And this feels like it has the makings of a really good long form story. And I think it's important probably that we take a trip over to Ireland to meet some of these players and attend these matches and bring Gaelic football to the audience. So we should talk to a. Talk to the Daily Wire about that.
- [61:03]
Cabot Phillips
I regret to inform you that the Daily Wire already has a resident Irish woman. I should say Mary Margaret Olihan will be the one getting that assignment because she'll be able to blend in culturally. You and I are not going to blend in the way that she would. So we'll send her anyways. Tim, it's time to go nuclear. The curse is over. Thanks for coming on.
- [61:22]
Tim Rice
Hit the nuclear button.
- [61:24]
Cabot Phillips
Hit the nuclear button, lad. All right, that was Daily Wire D.C. bureau Chief Tim Rush. And this was Wired In. Thank you guys so much for tuning in. I miss you Every weekend I miss you guys. I miss doing this show. So thanks for tuning in. If you want to support the show, please go subscribe and follow us on Apple and Spotify. I would love if you could leave us a review. It would mean a lot to our entire team here who puts this show together. And if you want the show to Continue, go to dailywire.com subscribe because we got another few minutes of our live listener Q and A. I would love to get to know all of you. So go join. I'll see you guys tomorrow.