Loading summary
Sean Captain
Viking committed to exploring the world in comfort. Journey through the heart of Europe on an elegant Viking longship with thoughtful service, cultural enrichment and all inclusive fares.
Katie Dayton
Discover more@viking.com welcome to Tech News Briefing. It's Tuesday, July 1st. I'm Katie Dayton for the Wall Street Journal. All those ads marketing the AI powered credentials of products, services and, well, almost everything they may be vibing with consumers as planned. Two new studies explore why that could be Then while Israel and the US Were bombing Iran's nuclear sites, another less visible battle was raging. Cyber attacks on Iran's financial infrastructure have hobbled the country, breaking ATMs, halting payments and breaching Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange. We explore what happened on the cyber war's frontlines. But first, it seems like almost every company is marketing the AI part of their AI powered goods at the moment. But recent research has found that doing so could backfire and actually turn consumers off companies that do so. WSJ contributor Sean Captain has the story. Sean, how are consumers lately responding to these quote unquote powered by AI labels?
Sean Captain
Well, we looked at two studies. The main one was done out of Washington State University and Temple University, and the conclusion was that it actually hurt people's perceptions a little bit, essentially their willingness to want to seek out or buy the product. We looked at a second study that just released from a market research company called Parks Associates that also found a little more hesitancy to buy a product if AI were mentioned. It wasn't like it was a kiss of death to say AI. It was that people were a little less inclined to buy it. Basically it didn't help their cause, but it didn't send people running away from the product.
Katie Dayton
What kinds of reasons did the researchers that you spoke to offer to explain this less than positive reaction to these AI labels?
Sean Captain
Yeah, there was really a lot of probing of that in the university study. And they talked about a cognitive understanding of AI and sort of a more emotional understanding of it. And their assumption and conclusion was that because people aren't exactly sure what the AI is doing or in some cases why it's even in there. For example, they asked about an AI equipped refrigerator and it was like, huh? So because they didn't know what was in it, they were a little more suspicious of it or at least hesitant about it. And it became a bit more of an emotional kind of reaction. Like I don't quite understand this, but it makes me feel a little bit uneasy.
Katie Dayton
How did age factor into consumers reactions?
Sean Captain
So the university study, they had A representative sampling of ages from pretty young to pretty old. But once you broke that down, they only had about 100 people in each group. So they couldn't really have a large enough sample to say how age mattered. However, the second study by Parks, the market research study, they spoke to about 4,000 people on this question. Very similar question about would you be more inclined to buy if it had AI? They found a clear difference among ages. The younger groups, say in their 20s up to 40s, were more disposed to buy something if it had AI in it. Then you get into the 65 year old group and they were less so. It could be that what we're seeing reflects the current market, but in the future, AI may end up being a bonus.
Katie Dayton
In light of all of this, what did your sources recommend to companies wanting to advertise their AI powered tools and products?
Sean Captain
Well, essentially that they just make it clear what the benefit is to them. They did find that in some cases it was clear. So the university study, and I should point out that the products they asked about in the university study were all fictional. So it was like a company called elevo that made TVs or Neura that made cars, for instance. But what they found was that in some cases oppressions were less negative or more positive. For instance, a customer service chatbot, people got the idea of that very easily. But for example, the refrigerator, it was just a bit of a disconnect for people. Another thing that I learned from Parks as well is that people would appreciate AI in home security, things like a ring doorbell kind of thing. Because anything that would help them get better information and maybe assess a danger could be something that the researcher thought that they would be positively disposed to it. But like I say, if it's not really clear what it does, the research says that people instead go to the negative. What's it going to cost? What are they going to do with my data? How is this going to make the product harder or less desirable to use?
Katie Dayton
That was WSJ contributor Sean Captain. Coming up, a pro Israeli hacking group caused widespread damage to Iran's financial system. We'll explain how. And off to the break.
Angus Baric
Tariff and trade policies are dynamic, supply chains squeezed and cash flow tighter than ever. You need total visibility from global shipments to tariff impacts to real time cash flow. That's NetSuite by Oracle, your AI powered business management suite. Trusted by over 41,000 businesses. NetSuite brings accounting, financial management, inventory, HR into one suite to help you know what's stuck, what it's costing you, and how to pivot fast if your revenues are at least in the seven figures, download the free ebook Navigating Global 3 Insights for Leaders at netsuite.com wallstreet.net.
Katie Dayton
Israeli authorities and a pro Israeli hacking group have sent portions of Iran's precarious financial infrastructure into disarray, targeting a state owned bank and a popular cryptocurrency exchange. US Sanctions imposed on and off for decades have aimed to cut Iran off from the international financial system. But the recent cyber attacks led Iran's government to pull the plug on much of the country's online activities. WSJ reporter Angus Baric joins us with the details. Angus, can you paint a picture of how damaged Iran's financial and cyber systems.
Angus Baric
Are right now since Israel started targeting Iran, other than bombing the nuclear sites and assassinating Iran's nuclear scientists, they've also dealt a pretty serious blow to Iran's kind of financial infrastructure. They've crippled a pretty key kind of state owned bank in Iran, BankSEPA, which services a lot of Iran's military. They also took out Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange called Novatex, which has become quite an important channel for Iranians to move money in and out of the country, sidestepping the US economic blockade against Iran.
Katie Dayton
How have the attacks affected the day to day lives of regular Iranian citizens?
Angus Baric
So with the banks, they paralyzed online payments. A lot of cash machines stopped working. There were reports in Iranian state media that kind of military retirees weren't being paid out their salaries. And with Novatex people inside Iran and outside of Iran, they've seen this vital kind of channel for foreign money flows effectively being cut off over the past two weeks. And the exchange says that it's trying to restore its services, but this time it's still partly hobbled.
Katie Dayton
And to what extent was this attack orchestrated by Israeli authorities versus pro Israel hacking groups?
Angus Baric
You know, most of this damage has been done by a pro Israeli hacking group called Predatory Sparrow. They directed the hacks against Bank Sepa and Novotex. Predatory Sparrow, they don't say whether they're acting on behalf of Israeli authorities. They operate anonymously and they've been tweeting about their hacking operations as they've been carrying them out. I spoke with Israeli government officials about the hack. They said that they didn't have any information about potential connections between the group and the Israeli state itself. However, people in the kind of cyber security community, when they're assessing the sacking group's activities, they think that it does fit the Profile of a potential group that is in some way backed by Israeli authorities.
Katie Dayton
And Predatory Sparrow. How much do we know about who they are and how they operate?
Angus Baric
We don't know who's behind the curtain there. All we have is a kind of anonymous X account that tweets about these hacks. However, they've been active since at least 2021 and at least according to researchers, have been kind of exclusively targeting Iran. They've carried out very disruptive hacks before, such as knocking out a lot of the payment terminals that people use in kind of gas stations in Iran. So this is just the kind of the latest in their attempts to sabotage kind of Iranian infrastructure.
Katie Dayton
How much do we know about the support that Israel is offering? Predatory Sparrow?
Angus Baric
We don't know too much about the support itself. Looking at how the group kind of conducts itself, you know, how it's exclusively focused on Iran. It's said that it targeted these financial institutions because they are the financial lifelines of the Iranian military. And what's more, this group, they managed to extract about $100 million worth of funds from this cryptocurrency exchange, Novatex. And instead of keeping this money, as you would expect a hacking group to do, that's a pretty hefty bounty. They actually burned this cryptocurrency sum by sending the funds to digital wallets, which they don't have any access to.
Katie Dayton
And how have Iran and pro Iranian groups responded to these attacks?
Angus Baric
So Iran, the government has descended into a kind of state of paranoia, both kind of resulting from these hacks and obviously the broader military actions against them and their fears of an uprising against their authority. So Iranian authorities, they largely pulled the plug on the country's Internet. Foreign based websites weren't accessible. The government was warning citizens to not use foreign phones or foreign messaging platforms out of concern that, you know, Israeli spies could get people's data. Government officials were told not to use smartwatches and laptops for similar reasons.
Katie Dayton
Last week, Israel confirmed a ceasefire with Iran. Do your sources anticipate there will be a technological ceasefire as well in the background?
Angus Baric
There's always quite a high degree of kind of cyber warfare taking place between Iran and Israel, or at least between hacking groups that are aligned with either government, whether the bombs are flying or not, at least, you know, with the researchers that I've spoken to, they do anticipate that this sort of shadow cyber war will continue, even though an official ceasefire has been declared.
Katie Dayton
That was WSJ reporter Angus Baric. And that's it for tech news. Briefing. Today's show was produced by Julie Chang with supervising producer Melanie Roy. I'm Katie Dayton for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back this afternoon with TNB Tech Minutes. Thanks for listening.
Angus Baric
In business, they say you can have better, cheaper or faster. But you only get to pick two. What if you could have all three? You can with Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, OCI is the blazing fast hyperscaler for your infrastructure, database, application development and AI needs, where you can run any workload for less. Compared with other clouds, OCI costs up to 50% less for compute, 70% less for storage, and 80% less for networking. Try OCI for free@oracle.com wallstreet oracle.com wall wall street.
WSJ Tech News Briefing Summary Episode: How Hackers Crippled Iran’s Financial System Release Date: July 1, 2025
In the initial segment of the episode, host Katie Dayton delves into the burgeoning trend of companies highlighting the artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities of their products and services. WSJ contributor Sean Captain provides an in-depth analysis of recent studies that shed light on how consumers are reacting to these "AI-powered" labels.
Consumer Hesitancy Towards AI Labels
At [01:28], Sean Captain states:
"We looked at two studies. The main one was done out of Washington State University and Temple University, and the conclusion was that it actually hurt people's perceptions a little bit, essentially their willingness to want to seek out or buy the product."
The studies reveal a nuanced consumer response:
Understanding the Underlying Reasons
When queried about the reasons behind this reaction, Captain explains at [02:16]:
"People aren't exactly sure what the AI is doing or in some cases why it's even in there. For example, they asked about an AI equipped refrigerator and it was like, huh?"
This uncertainty leads to emotional unease rather than rational skepticism. The lack of clear benefits or understanding of AI's role in products fosters suspicion and reluctance.
Demographic Variations in Perception
Addressing age-related differences, Captain notes at [03:02]:
"You get into the 65-year-old group and they were less so [inclined to buy AI products]."
The Parks Associates study further elaborates that younger demographics (ages 20-40) are more receptive to AI integration in products, viewing it as a value-add. In contrast, older consumers exhibit more resistance, possibly due to unfamiliarity or apprehension towards new technologies.
Recommendations for Companies
In light of these findings, Sean Captain offers strategic advice at [03:56]:
"If it's not really clear what it does, the research says that people instead go to the negative."
Companies are encouraged to:
Transitioning from consumer technology trends, the podcast shifts focus to geopolitical cyber warfare. Katie Dayton introduces WSJ reporter Angus Baric, who unpacks the recent cyberattacks that have severely impacted Iran's financial systems.
Overview of the Cyberattacks
At [06:39], Angus Baric provides a comprehensive overview:
"They've crippled a pretty key kind of state-owned bank in Iran, BankSEPA, which services a lot of Iran's military. They also took out Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange called Novatex."
These attacks target critical financial institutions, aiming to destabilize Iran's economic resilience against longstanding US sanctions.
Impact on Iranian Citizens
Discussing the repercussions on everyday life, Baric explains at [07:26]:
"With the banks, they paralyzed online payments. A lot of cash machines stopped working. There were reports in Iranian state media that kind of military retirees weren't being paid out their salaries."
The disruption of BankSEPA and Novatex has hindered both governmental financial operations and the personal financial transactions of Iranian citizens, exacerbating economic strain.
Operation of the Hacking Group: Predatory Sparrow
Delving into the perpetrators, Baric describes Predatory Sparrow at [08:06]:
"They operate anonymously and they've been tweeting about these hacks as they've been carrying them out."
Key insights about Predatory Sparrow:
Financial Maneuvers and Implications
A significant move by Predatory Sparrow involved the cryptocurrency exchange Novatex. At [10:22], Baric reveals:
"They managed to extract about $100 million worth of funds from this cryptocurrency exchange, Novatex. And instead of keeping this money, as you would expect a hacking group to do, that's a pretty hefty bounty. They actually burned this cryptocurrency sum by sending the funds to digital wallets, which they don't have any access to."
This act not only siphoned funds but also ensured the money couldn't be reclaimed or utilized, amplifying the financial blow to Iran.
Iran's Response and Ongoing Cyber Conflict
Addressing Iran's countermeasures, Baric states at [10:26]:
"Iranian authorities... pulled the plug on the country's Internet. Foreign-based websites weren't accessible. The government was warning citizens to not use foreign phones or foreign messaging platforms out of concern that, you know, Israeli spies could get people's data."
Despite a recent ceasefire announced by Israel, at [11:14], Baric cautions:
"They do anticipate that this sort of shadow cyber war will continue, even though an official ceasefire has been declared."
This suggests that cyber conflicts remain a persistent and covert front in the broader geopolitical tensions between Israel and Iran.
Conclusion
This episode of the WSJ Tech News Briefing offers a dual exploration of current technological and geopolitical issues:
Listeners gain valuable insights into both the market dynamics surrounding emerging technologies and the intricate landscape of cyber-based geopolitical strategies.