
Loading summary
A
Many companies are struggling to scale their AI deployments or even move them past the pilot stage. Often the problem isn't technology, but organizational misalignment around goals, processes and incentives. At the break, join Caroline Roach, senior partner, IBM Consulting, to learn why.
B
Here's your afternoon TNB Tech minute for Thursday, May 21st. I'm Julie Chang for the Wall Street Journal. President Trump postponed the signing of an executive order that would have given the government more oversight over the AI industry. Trump said he didn't want to take any action that would slow down the US in the AI race. He said the order would have asked AI companies to preview models with the federal government, but that such a move would set back the US in its competition with China. Trump's decision is a win for business focused advisors, including venture capitalist David Sachs, who has pushed for an industry friendly approach to AI. Sachs and others have argued that the economic benefits of AI models outweigh the risks. And just hours before, California governor Gavin Newsom issued his own executive order aimed at studying how AI affects employment and exploring ways to help displaced workers. The order from Newsom, a Democrat seen as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, follows signs of growing public discontent over the rapid rise of AI. The governor has tasked one state agency to launch a dashboard tracking AI's impact on employment across different sectors. Another agency must submit a review of safety net policies workers displaced by AI, including severance and other forms of compensation. While a big beneficiary of the wealth AI companies are generating, California is also home to tech workers who are losing jobs due to AI. Finally, the maker of OURA rings filed confidentially for an initial public offering. OURA rings track metrics such as heart rate and skin temperature and are intended to help improve sleep and reduce stress. The company was valued at about $11 billion as of October. Investors include Fidelity Management and Research, Dexcom and Forerunner Ventures. For a deeper dive into what's happening in tech, check out Friday's Tech News Briefing podcast.
A
Scaling AI successfully requires more than the right technology. Here again is Caroline Roach, senior partner, IBM Consulting.
C
The biggest thing that we were talking about a year ago is what model to use, and the biggest thing that I'm talking about with my clients now is how do I drive change within my organization?
A
Companies able to identify correct and then avoid misalignment will be best positioned to deliver meaningful business value from AI.
C
The organizations that are the most successful set very clear targets and have several priorities that are very clear across the enterprise. The technology is really good, but if you're not changing your organizational alignment, not incentivizing your people correctly, not looking at workflows. You're not going to see real value with it.
A
Visit IBM.com think leadership to learn how building organizational alignment can help deliver AI deployments that scale and drive growth.
D
This content was created by custom content from WSJ, a unit of the Wall Street Journal advertising department.
Date: May 21, 2026
Host: Julie Chang (The Wall Street Journal)
In this Tech Minute episode, the Wall Street Journal covers a pivotal policy decision: President Trump postponing the signing of a federal AI executive order amid concerns of overregulation and its potential impact on U.S. competitiveness in AI. The episode further contrasts federal action with a new executive order from California Governor Gavin Newsom focused on the social impact of AI, specifically employment. There is also a brief update on OURA, the health-tech company, confidentially filing for IPO. A segment with Caroline Roach of IBM Consulting explores the organizational challenges in scaling AI deployments effectively.
Timestamps: 00:16–01:22
President Trump delayed the signing of an executive order intended to increase government oversight over AI.
The reason for the postponement: concern that the order could “slow down the US in the AI race,” especially against China.
The draft order would have required AI companies to submit their models for preview to the federal government.
This move is considered a win for business-focused advisors—especially venture capitalist David Sachs—who advocate for light-touch, industry-friendly AI regulation.
Sachs and others argue that the economic upsides of AI outweigh regulatory risks.
Timestamps: 01:22–01:58
Timestamps: 01:58–02:12
Timestamps: 02:12–02:57
Featuring Caroline Roach, Senior Partner, IBM Consulting.
Roach explains that the main obstacle for many organizations isn’t the technology itself, but how they align goals, processes, and incentives to support AI initiatives.
Alignment and incentives are critical:
Julie Chang [00:41]:
“Trump said he didn’t want to take any action that would slow down the US in the AI race.”
Julie Chang [01:53]:
“California is also home to tech workers who are losing jobs due to AI.”
Caroline Roach [02:18]:
“The biggest thing that we were talking about a year ago is what model to use, and the biggest thing that I’m talking about with my clients now is how do I drive change within my organization?”
Caroline Roach [02:36]:
“The organizations that are the most successful set very clear targets and have several priorities that are very clear across the enterprise. The technology is really good, but if you’re not changing your organizational alignment, not incentivizing your people correctly, not looking at workflows, you’re not going to see real value with it.”
This episode provides a rapid-fire but robust look at the unfolding debate between promoting AI innovation versus regulating potential risks, and how these tensions play out at both national and state levels. It also features essential perspectives on what it really takes to scale AI in real-world business settings.