Loading summary
Vanguard Marketing
Exchanges on navigating macro uncertainty exchanges on the forces shaping global markets. For the sharpest analysis on finance, business and the economy count on exchanges. The Goldman Sachs podcast Listen now.
Azhar Sukri
All eyes on today's jobs data and whether the numbers will show a slowing economy. Plus, the Journal exclusively reports the US Is ready to start renegotiating its largest free trade deal. And tech CEOs praise Trump even as the president threatens substantial tariffs on chip imports.
Government Official
Your administration is investing a lot already. The action plan under your leadership, I think is a great start and we look forward to working together. And thanks for your leadership.
President Donald Trump
Great job. You're doing incredible, really.
Azhar Sukri
It's Friday, September 5th. I'm Azhar Sukri for the Wall Street Journal. Here is the AM edition of what's news, the top headlines and business stories moving your world. Today, it's Jobs Day usa and this month there's more riding on the number than ever before, with the last release prompting the unprecedented dismissal of the head of labour statistics following several downward revisions to U.S. non farm payrolls. Economics reporter Justin Lehart says today's data is expected to show a further weakening of the labour market.
Justin Lehart
Economists the Wall Street Journal polled expect 75,000 new jobs were added in August, just marginally above the 73,000 that were created in July. And they also expect the unemployment rate to nudge up to 4.3%. So it's really this picture of gradual weakness. There are some concerns that the report could come in weaker. We saw that the report from ADP, which is a big payroll processor, they showed 54,000 private sector payrol jobs created in August, which is a lot weaker than people expected.
Azhar Sukri
And that weakening job market is adding to concerns that the US Economy could stall out.
Justin Lehart
In a situation where consumers are looking around, they're seeing a weakening job market. They're maybe seeing, you know, no job creation where businesses are seeing the same thing that we see a pullback in terms of what consumers are doing, in terms of what businesses are doing. And things can deteriorate more quickly than you would like and more quickly than policymakers might be able to fix.
Azhar Sukri
One of those fixes could be cutting interest rates to ease pressure on companies and Americans looking to borrow money. And as Justin explains, while the Fed is expected to cut rates later this month, the central bank is walking a difficult tightrope.
Justin Lehart
Most people think that it is going to cut rates by a quarter point just given sort of the deterioration that we're seeing in the labor market across a lot of measures. The concern is always that it could be too late, that things could be worse than the data are actually showing. We have seen a lot of downward revisions to this data. There is a general concern that the labor market data might be overstating job growth. So, you know, it's a very sort of touchy situation that the Fed is, you know, especially given that inflation is still above 2% that they're looking for.
Azhar Sukri
And we'll get a clearer picture of the US Economy and just what that means for the Fed when non farm payrolls are released at 8:30am Eastern, we'll have live coverage and all the analysis on WSJ.com we are exclusively reporting that the US is getting ready to start renegotiating its largest free trade deal, the U. S. Mexico Canada Agreement. The U.S. trade Representative's office could begin public consultations on renegotiating the deal as soon as this week. The trade representative's office declined to comment and the White House didn't respond to a request. Trump has undermined the USMCA in his second term by imposing and then paring back stiff tariffs on Canada and Mexico, arguing that the duties are justified because of drug trafficking through each of the countries. Elsewhere in Washington, how much are you.
President Donald Trump
Spending, would you say, over the next few years?
Government Official
Oh, gosh, I mean, I think it's probably going to be something like, I don't know, at least $600 billion through 28 in the U.S. yeah, it's a lot. No, it's significant.
Azhar Sukri
President Trump hosted the country's top tech leaders for dinner at the White House last night, including Meta Platform CEO Mark Zuckerberg. And the tech titans spent time praising the president for his efforts to promote investments in chip manufacturing and artificial intelligence. Trump also quizzed the executives on how much they are committing to spend in the US Including Apple Chief Executive Tim Cook.
President Donald Trump
And Tim, how much money will Apple be investing in the United States? Because I know it's a very loud and it's, you know, you were elsewhere and now you're really coming home in a big way. How much money would you be investing?
Azhar Sukri
600 billion.
President Donald Trump
600 billion, we're very proud to do.
Azhar Sukri
Trump also reiterated a warning that he will soon impose, quote, fairly substantial tariffs on semiconductor imports from from companies that do not shift production to the US but added that he will spare firms like Apple that expand investments domestically. Notably absent from the dinner, Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk as well as Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. People familiar with Huang's thinking said he prefers to interface with the White House in one on one settings where the president has enough time to focus on substantive issues. And the Department of Defense is set for a rebrand. President Trump is expected to sign an executive order today to change its name to the Department of War, a name last used in 1947. Under the executive order, the Department of War is set to be the agency's secondary title until Congress approves the new name. Trump has frequently floated the idea, and according to a White House document, the Department of War conveys a stronger message of readiness and resolve compared with the Department of Defense. The White House added that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth would be able to use the secondary title of secretary of war. Coming up, how do European voters feel about putting their troops in harm's way in defense of Ukraine? That story and more after the break.
Vanguard Marketing
To all the financial advisors listening, let's talk bonds for a minute. We see a lot of big firms throw a couple flashy funds your way and call it a day, but not Vanguard. Vanguard bonds are institutional quality. We're talking top grade products across the board of over 80 bond funds actively managed by a 200 person global team. So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see the record for yourself@vanguard.com audio that's vanguard.com audio all investing is subject to risk. Vanguard Marketing Corporation distributor.
Azhar Sukri
Despite President Trump hosting multiple meetings focused on ending Russia's invasion on Ukraine, there's no timeline on when the war could end. Trump's 50 day deadline for a Russian ceasefire has already passed and so has his promised two week timeline for a summit with himself, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump had also hoped European European troops could help secure peace in Ukraine. But as the Journal's Paris bureau chief Stacey Maitre explains, boots on the ground may still be a long way away.
Stacey Maitre
There's still broad public support for supporting Ukraine, both in terms of economic aid and military equipment, arms, et cetera. The reservations arise simply when discussions start about putting, you know, troops into the country. That's where you see the Italians, the Poles, even some French start to get a little bit anxious. Obviously in places like Germany, which is, you know, still haunted by the legacy of World War II, you have a culture of pacifism, if you will, that doesn't have any interest in engaging in military conflict and especially not with Russia, which is just on the other side of the continent. And so when Germans are asked, how do you feel about putting boots on the ground? The first response is, well, we really need to be keeping our military here at home to protect us. A similar response you hear from Eastern Europe, which really forms the eastern flank of NATO. Countries like Poland also see boots on the ground as a real red line. They feel like if we put soldiers into Ukraine, that could be perceived as a provocation of Russia and that could make the conflict bleed over the Polish border.
Azhar Sukri
Stacey so what military capabilities does Europe lack which the US Would need to fill?
Stacey Maitre
So the obvious ones are air support, which means, of course, fighter jets. We're also talking about air defense systems, the Patriot system. Basically, you want to, as much as possible, protect the Ukrainian skies. The Europeans also really rely on the United States for intelligence and reconnaissance. And then there are the sort of nuts and bolts logistics which aren't very sexy but are absolutely essential. You need troop carriers, you need planes who can take European troops into Ukraine. Unfortunately, European militaries do not have these capabilities and have long relied on the US for this kind of stuff.
Azhar Sukri
Yeah, the role of the US Is going to be crucial in all of this. But assuming there is a peace deal, which right now seems like a remote possibility, what might a European military presence look like in Ukraine?
Stacey Maitre
So the discussions for the time being are fairly limited. So the only countries that have really talked numbers are France and the uk, Europe's two biggest militaries. Each country has said they're willing to provide between 3,000 and 5,000 troops. So, you know, combined that would be up to 10,000 troops. That's far short of what most analysts think would be necessary to really act as a deterrent against Russia attacks. And let's remember, that's the whole point of this force. The idea is that the Europeans want to put skin in the game. They want to have a force based in Ukraine to essentially act as a deterrent against Putin in case he decides to violate a peace accord and reinvade Ukraine. So for the time being, we're looking at 10,000 troops. The hope would be that other European countries will pitch in forces of their own. And that's why we go back to the question of what role will the US have, because if the US Has a significant role, then we might see other European countries come around.
Azhar Sukri
Journal Paris Bureau chief Stacy Maitre. Thank you so much.
Stacey Maitre
You're welcome.
Azhar Sukri
And as the fashion world mourns the loss of Giorgio Armani, who died yesterday at 91, attention's now turning to the future of the brand he built and ran. Armani was not only a designer, but one of the last great owner operators in the luxury industry. Unlike rivals who ceded control to conglomerates such as LVMH or Kering, Armani kept his company private. And as Journal luxury reporter Nick Kostov says, the big question now is whether Armani's foundation will be able to succeed the founder and preserve his legacy.
Nick Kostov
Giorgio Armani always wanted to stay independent. He felt that was very important to him. He had quite a tight inner circle. And so much of the control will now go to these people who have worked with Armani for a long time. He's created some bylaws for this foundation, which set rules around things like an IPO or a sale. But it's very rare that a business like this becomes available to the big conglomerates like LVMH and Kering. And so I think what people will look at is will this business get sold? It's a business that can do with some rejuvenation. Will it have on its own the kind of scale and the funds to invest, or will one of the big conglomerates try and snap it up? That's what the market is looking at right now.
Azhar Sukri
And that's it for what's news for this Friday morning. Today's show was produced by Kate Bullivant and Daniel Bark. Our supervising producer is Sandra Kilhoff. Hi, I'm Azhar Sucri for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back tonight with a new show. Until then, have a great weekend and thanks for listening.
Joe Davis
In his new book, Coming into View, how AI and other megatrends will shape your investments, Joe Davis, global chief economist at Vanguard, reveals what market and global trends signify for the future economy.
Unknown Interviewee
The headline is it's not all doom and gloom. Much like we saw with the personal computer in the 80s, it went from do I have to worry about this thing? Do I use it to. No, actually, it could help, but yet it's change.
Joe Davis
Get more insights from Vanguard on how you can navigate an uncertain market@vanguard.com.
Date: September 5, 2025
Host: Azhar Sukri
Podcast: Wall Street Journal What’s News
This episode centers on the highly anticipated release of U.S. jobs data, its implications for the economy, and related policy decisions. Additional major stories include the reopening of U.S. trade negotiations with Canada and Mexico, President Trump’s engagement with tech industry leaders, a possible Department of Defense rebranding, the outlook for European military engagement in Ukraine, and the death of fashion icon Giorgio Armani.
“Economists the Wall Street Journal polled expect 75,000 new jobs were added in August, just marginally above the 73,000 that were created in July. And they also expect the unemployment rate to nudge up to 4.3%. So it's really this picture of gradual weakness.” (01:26–01:41)
“Things can deteriorate more quickly than you would like and more quickly than policymakers might be able to fix.” (02:09–02:29)
“The concern is always that it could be too late, that things could be worse than the data are actually showing … It’s a very sort of touchy situation…” (02:47–03:15)
President Trump: “And Tim, how much money will Apple be investing in the United States? Because I know... you were elsewhere and now you’re really coming home in a big way. How much money would you be investing?”
Azhar Sukri: "600 billion."
President Trump: “600 billion, we're very proud to do.” (05:04–05:19)
“There's still broad public support for supporting Ukraine... The reservations arise simply when discussions start about putting...troops into the country.” (08:07–08:21)
“The obvious ones are air support... air defense systems... Europeans also really rely on the United States for intelligence and reconnaissance.” (09:21–09:38)
“France and the UK... each [are] willing to provide between 3,000 and 5,000 troops... That's far short of what most analysts think would be necessary.” (10:12–10:45)
"He had quite a tight inner circle... But it's very rare that a business like this becomes available to the big conglomerates..." (11:56–12:32)
“It’s really this picture of gradual weakness.”
“The concern is always that it could be too late, that things could be worse than the data are actually showing.”
“The reservations arise simply when discussions start about putting...troops into the country.”
“How much money will Apple be investing in the United States?... 600 billion, we're very proud to do.”
The episode provides a concise yet comprehensive overview of pivotal economic, political, and corporate events shaping global markets today—from the fragile state of U.S. employment data and consequent policy considerations, to high-stakes trade negotiations, shifting tech sector alliances, evolving military terminology, and the European quest for consensus on Ukraine. The death of Giorgio Armani adds a cultural coda, highlighting ongoing shifts in luxury business dynamics.