Luke Vargas (2:19)

House Republicans have broken with President Trump and party leadership on a pair of measures blocking a longer term renewal of a powerful national security surveillance program and voting to reinstate temporary legal protections for Haitian immigrants. Yesterday, 11 Republicans joined Democrats to extend TPS protections for roughly 350,000 Haitians for another three years, with several GOP lawmakers defending migrants in their communities, including Nebraska's Don Bacon, who cited risks to the state's short staffed healthcare industry and hours later, a number of holdout Republicans voted against a five year renewal of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance act, which enables the collection of info on foreigners overseas who use U.S. communications systems. In a late night debate, Georgia Republican Austin Scott defended the renewal while Massachusetts Democrat Jim McGovern said lawmakers had had no time to read through the proposal.

Austin Scott (3:14)

Our purpose here today is to give law enforcement the ability to operate in a timely manner to stop terrorist attacks on United States soil. That's it. Failing to reauthorize the statutory authority would be a massive setback and one that our adversaries would exploit immediately. Just about everyone agrees that this is serious stuff, the kind of debate that Congress ought to have in the open. Instead, Republican leadership just jammed us. Does anybody actually know what the hell is in this thing? It is 11:30 at night.

Luke Vargas (3:54)

With no immediate path forward, the House voted to extend the law for just two more weeks until April 30th. Ford says it's planning to partner with Chinese manufacturers overseas in what the carmaker CEO says is a vital move to maintaining a competitive edge globally. Jim Farley's comments come after he told Fox News earlier this week that Chinese automakers would devastate the US Auto industry and should not be allowed in. But instead of entirely blocking Chinese competitors, Journal Autos reporter Stephen Wilmot says that Farley is hoping to harness their technology.

Ryan Knudson (4:30)

Farley, like many Mary Barratt gm, they're adamant that they don't want imports of Chinese made cars competing with the production base in the U.S. essentially, he points out, like a lot of people, that China has factories set up to produce far more cars than they can actually consume in the country. And this is putting a lot of pressure on Chinese automakers to export vehicles. And these vehicles are flooding into Europe, into emerging markets, into Mexico now, maybe even into Canada following a deal between Mark Carney and President Xi earlier this at the same time, Jim Farley has been one of the most open in praising Chinese technology and saying that Detroit has something to learn from Shenzhen. And that's where the position becomes a bit more blurred. He would like the technology without the

Luke Vargas (5:18)

imports, America's busiest airport won't be as busy as United and American Airlines were hoping for this summer. That's after the Federal Aviation Administration said it would allow almost 400 fewer flights than the airlines have scheduled at Chicago O', Hare, undercutting a fight between the rivals to book more passengers through the busy hub. Earlier this year, the FAA said that the increase in traffic could compromise operations at O' Hare which currently runs about 100 departures and 100 arrivals every hour. Americans said the airline had secured a sufficient level of flights and that the cuts would reduce delays for customers, while United said it's reviewing the FAA's order. And big tech companies are attempting a tricky balancing act, clinging to carbon neutrality goals while pushing ahead on an emissions heavy buildout of AI Data Centers. Since 2020, Microsoft's total emissions have increased by 50%, while Google's and Meta's have soared by more than 70 and 80% respectively. And they're not slowing down even as they keep decarbonization targets on the books. Meta is financing seven new gas power plants in Louisiana, tripling its current electricity emissions, while a new data center being built in West Virginia is expected to raise Microsoft emissions by 44%, according to Climate advocacy group Stan Earth Journal sustainability reporter Yousef Khan has been looking into what the companies are doing to offset AI's growing carbon footprint.

Yousef Khan (6:48)

Whilst these emissions are going up, they're the ones that are really spending this money. Microsoft in particular has spent billions on carbon removal. Google has done the same. Meta has done the same. So they've been pumping in money into a lot of startups. Some of them take farm waste or human waste and pump it hundreds of meters underground to lock the carbon emissions away. Others are spreading basalt rock across Farmland and the CO2 captured in rainwater then gets locked in that rock and then eventually into the water system. You also have tree planting programs which aim to restore rainforests. They're trying to really grow this market of carbon removals, which they always say is very much the way to bring down emissions more broadly and in doing so has kick started the market which really wouldn't exist without these big tech companies.

Luke Vargas (7:31)

Amazon has acknowledged that AI will increase its emissions, but is working on carbon free energy solutions for its data centers. Meta and Microsoft both said that they remain committed to their climate goals, while Google declined to comment. Coming up, we'll look at the state of local news in America and get an update on QVC's efforts to stay afloat as home shopping shifts to social media. That's after the break.

Stitch Fix Advertiser (7:59)

Stitch Fix Shopping is hard.

Luke Vargas (8:01)

Let's talk about it. I don't have time to shop so I buy all my clothes where I buy my seafood. I just want someone to tell me what shirt goes with what pants. I just want jeans that fit.

Stitch Fix Advertiser (8:11)

Stitch Fix makes shopping easy. Just show your size, style and budget and your stylist sends personalized looks right to your door. No subscription required, plus free shipping and returns.

Luke Vargas (8:20)

Man, that was easy. That looked good.

Stitch Fix Advertiser (8:23)

Stitch Fix Online Personal styling for everyone. Take your style quiz today@stitch fix.com.

Luke Vargas (8:32)

well, if you've made it this far in the episode, you're clearly a fan of national and international news. But how closely are you keeping up with what's going on locally? Well, the Pew Research center is out with a new analysis of how Americans are engaging with local news, and senior researcher Alyssa Shearer is here to discuss it. Lisa, how has news consumption been shifting over the years?

Alyssa Shearer (8:53)

We've seen a pattern in the past decade across all types of news, national, international, and local news that Americans have declined in their consumption of all of those types of news. For local news specifically, 30, 87% of US adults said they followed local news very closely in 2016, and that's dropped to 21% as of December 2025.

Luke Vargas (9:11)

Is that a bigger drop than you've seen in terms of national, international news?

Alyssa Shearer (9:16)

It actually follows national and international news about the same rate.

Luke Vargas (9:19)

And yet I can't help but wonder if the local news consumption drop isn't particularly symptomatic of some of the bigger trends we see out there. You know, politics is increasingly national, and then there's where people are getting their info. TikTok isn't exactly geared to surfacing hyperlocal content.

Alyssa Shearer (9:37)

Yeah, and actually this is the first time that in our local news survey we've asked the question about news influencers specifically as a source of local news,

Luke Vargas (9:44)

how much are they engaging with those influencers?

Alyssa Shearer (9:46)

It's exactly on par with how often people get local news from daily newspapers. So 36% of our survey respondents said they get local news from daily newspapers, which is down from the first time that we asked that question. And the exact same percentage said that they get local news from news influencers.

Luke Vargas (10:00)

Elisa, is it possible the drop in attention to local news is a consequence of local news outlets drying up? How can you be interested in stories that you're just not hearing about?

Alyssa Shearer (10:10)

Yeah, the decline in local news has been facing financial issues and closing and consolidating on the TV side as well. And we do see that reflected in how people are getting their news. So where we're seeing increases are things that aren't really connected to news outlets at all. Things like local organizations like churches or school groups, local governments or community or neighborhood newsletters or listservs like Facebook groups or nextware.

Luke Vargas (10:33)

I'm curious how much of that shift may be due to the fact that those news sources are free. I mean, what are people saying about their willingness to pay for local news,

Alyssa Shearer (10:41)

that's something that's actually quite consistently low. In 2018, when we first asked this question, 14% of Americans said they paid for local news in the last year. And in 2025, that number was 12%. So quite a consistently low number. So people are much less likely to pay for local news. The groups that are most likely to pay for local news are older Americans, those with a higher education and Democrats. And when we ask people why they don't pay for local news, the biggest reason that we get is actually that they can find plenty of free local news. Another pretty large portion say they're not interested enough in local news to pay for it. But if you think about, you know, the average American still, even though it's seen a little bit of decline, gets most of their local news from television. And the industry side, TV hasn't really had the same hit as local newspapers. And so if you think of the average consumer seeing their local news channel doing fine, then you can kind of understand why people look at their ecosystem and say these companies seem to be doing pretty well financially.

Luke Vargas (11:33)

Lisa, thank you so much for joining us on what's news.

Alyssa Shearer (11:36)

Thank you.

Luke Vargas (11:42)

And finally, for 40 years, QVC has been a fixture in many American living rooms, offering a 24 hour stream of high energy product demonstrations, ticking countdown timers and the comforting hum of home shopping.

Alyssa Shearer (11:56)

This is called Gold Cork, which I think is just so pretty this time of year.

Luke Vargas (12:01)

But yesterday, that era reached a definitive turning point as QVC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Stitch Fix Advertiser (12:07)

Then you have Cream Snake, which is just fabulous.

Luke Vargas (12:12)

Despite a loyal consumer base, QVC has struggled to bridge the gap between its aging TV audience and new competitive consumer spaces like TikTok Shop and Amazon Live. Though for now the cameras will stay on with QVC saying that its on air programming, websites and shipping operations will continue without interruption during the bankruptcy process. And that's it for what's news for this Friday morning. Today's show was produced by Hattie Moyer and Daniel Bach. Our supervising producer is Sandra Kilhoff. And I'm Luke Vargas for the Wall Street Journal. We will be back tonight with a new show. Otherwise, have a great weekend and thanks for listening.

Stitch Fix Advertiser (12:55)

The Future of Everything is The Wall Street Journal's flagship live event returning to New York City May 4th through 5th. Be there. Policymakers and innovators sit down with our journalists to answer the most pressing questions of the day. From finance, tech and economic policy to sports streaming and style. We're bringing together today's most compelling newsmakers for two days of conversations on what's ahead. Listeners of this podcast can access exclusive discounted rates by visiting WSJ.com future that's WSJ.com future.