Transcript
A (0:02)
Last year, Instagram launched teen accounts, which default all teens into automatic protections for who can contact them and the content they can see. And we'll continue adding new safeguards for teens to help give parents peace of mind. Explore teen accounts, automatic protections, and all of our ongoing work@instagram.com Teenaccounts.
B (0:33)
A federal judge dismisses the government's antitrust case against Mehta. Plus, President Trump says Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman knew Nothing about the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi.
C (0:45)
You're mentioning somebody that was extremely controversial. A lot of people didn't like that gentleman that you're talking about. Whether you like him or didn't like him, things happen. But he knew nothing about it.
B (0:56)
And the House votes to release government files about Jeffrey Epstein. It's Tuesday, November 18th. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. This is the PM edition of what's News, the top headlines and business stories that move the world today. A federal judge has dismissed the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust case against Meta platforms. And the FTC filed its suit in 2020, dating back to the first Trump administration, claiming that Meta operated as a monopoly after its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, and that the Facebook owner's products don't compete with TikTok and YouTube. The judge's dismissal of the case deals a blow to one of the government's marquee antitrust lawsuits against big technology companies. WSJ reporter Megan Bobrovski joins me now to discuss the case and its implications. Megan, I want to start by talking about Meta. What does this dismissal mean for the company and what it can do?
D (1:53)
Yeah. So this is basically best case scenario for Meta. There are no restrictions. They don't have to do anything or change anything. They can just keep operating as normal. And where it is, a big win for them is they can continue to pursue their huge AI buildout without any restrictions coming from this litigation.
B (2:15)
One of the key points of this case seems to have been past actions versus present status. What does this case show about how the tech world has changed?
D (2:24)
This tells you how slowly litigation moves. This case was filed years ago. By the time that it actually got to court, Meta was in a very different place and now has a lot of other competitors. Well, that's what they argued, right? YouTube, TikTok, what. What Meta's products are used for evolved quite drastically over the time that this case was brought to the point where they were actually making the argument in court that people don't connect with their friends and family on its apps, which is kind of different from an argument they might have been making five years ago. The judge ultimately agreed with Meta that the FTC did not prove that the current conditions that Meta is operating in are a monopoly.
