Loading summary
A
Race the rudders. Raise the sails. Race the sails. Captain, an unidentified ship is approaching.
B
Over.
A
Roger, wait. Is that an enterprise sales solution?
C
Reach sales professionals, not professional sailors. With LinkedIn ads, you can target the right people by industry, job title and more. We'll even give you a $100 credit.
D
On your next campaign.
C
Get started today at LinkedIn.com results, terms and conditions apply.
A
Meta hits Hawes on its blockbuster AI hiring spree Plus Erik Prince, the former head of Blackwater, has a new guns for hire outfit moving in where the US Is stepping back now.
B
It's no longer the Bush era of foreign adventures. It's more, you know, an era of American retreat from the world under Trump.
A
And we look at how soaring childcare costs are impacting the economy. The latest in our parenting series. It's Thursday, August 21st. I'm Azhar Sukri for the Wall Street Journal. Here is the AM edition of what's news, the top headlines and business stories moving your world. Today, we are exclusively reporting that Meta Platforms is pumping the brakes on its fierce AI hiring spree after months of scooping up more than 50 artificial intelligence researchers and engineers, according to people familiar with the matter. A hiring freeze for the company' AI division went into effect last week, coinciding with a broader restructuring of the group, which also blocks current staffers from moving across teams inside the division. The arms race for AI talent has escalated in recent months and Meta has most often pushed the pace, offering prized researchers ultra lucrative pay packages. As of mid August, the company has hired more than 20 researchers and engineers from OpenAI and picked up other hires from major tech companies including Google, Apple, XAI and Anthropic. A Meta spokesperson confirmed the freeze. And speaking of tech companies yesterday, tech stocks fell for a second straight day. Journal markets reporter Caitlin McCabe has more on what's behind the recent slide.
E
Traders are saying there isn't one super clear catalyst for the sell off, but I think one possible culprit is just growing anxieties that AI is becoming a bit frothy. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, said recently that AI has some bubble like charact characteristics and there are some broader concerns about what tech giants are spending in this AI arms race. Analysts at Morgan Stanley said in a recent note that the kind of stock based compensation offered by companies right now like Meta and Google to lure AI talent could eventually threaten their ability to do things that investors really like, like share buybacks.
A
Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell and central bank governors are converging on Jackson Hole, Wyoming for their Annual conference. It's a gathering that will be closely watched by investors and Washington policymakers for clues about the Fed's strategy for the US Economy. And with just nine months left in the top job, Powell will give his final Jackson Hole speech tomorrow following months of President Trump pressuring him to cut interest rates or resign. The Journal's chief economics correspondent, Nick Timmy Timoros, says Powell has been facing a siege on multiple fronts.
F
First, take the economy. You have economic outlooks right now that are consistent with something kind of stagflation adjacent. What do I mean by that? Prices are rising, inflation has picked back up, but growth is slowing and the labor market looks like, if anything, it's getting weaker before it gets stronger. On top of that, you put on this pretty unprecedented political pressure. You have have the President calling on Fed individuals now to resign. You have all of these attacks on Powell, saying that he's incompetent, saying that he can't be trusted, which really are trying to undermine the institution and undercut the Fed's traditional independence. And then the Fed's rate setting committee is legitimately torn over what they should do given the economic outlook and given these pressures.
A
Nick explains how Powell is navigating such a turbulent period in the top job.
F
Well, people who work with them, associates of his that I've talked to have said he's just completely focused on finishing his job and on getting the policy right because all of the pressure that the Fed is facing right now will get a lot worse if things sort of get away from the Fed. He wants to turn over the job next spring to his successor with inflation under control and the economy in a good position. And it's getting harder to do that because of some of these other policy changes. But that's the job.
A
Ahead of Powell's speech tomorrow, investors will receive a wave of fresh economic data on deck today. Initial jobless claims and a survey on manufacturing from the Philly Fed due out at 8:30am Eastern. Readings from S and P Global on business activity at 9:45am and a look at existing home sales at 10am President Trump has ordered the Pentagon to send three Navy warships to intercept drug cartels off the coast of South America, including near Venezuela. The move is an expansion of the Pentagon's role in combating illegal narcotic smuggling and intensifies a U.S. confrontation with the country's president, Nicolas Maduro. Trump has designated Latin American drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. Erik Prince, the founder and former leader of Blackwater, is back in the White House's good graces and believes his new guns for hire firm can pick up the slack for international security jobs the Trump administration would prefer not to pay for. Blackwater was once America's largest mercenary force, but lost its standing in the US after the disclosure of violent excesses during former President George W. Bush's war on terror. The former Navy SEAL has a new venture, Vectus Global, a collective of companies contracted to do security work in Ecuador, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Haiti. And Journal correspondent Benoit Faucon reports that the work aligns with Trump's foreign policy goals of curbing illegal immigration and opening access to critical minerals.
B
So it's very different from the Bush era, where the US Government would foot the bill for security operations abroad. This time, Prince is being funded by local governments. The Trump administration sees eye to eye in terms of the common goals that Prince has when he helped these foreign governments, basically making sure these countries are stable. And we have a good example with Haiti. What Prince is doing in Haiti is using drones that support policing efforts targeting specifically gang members. The second one is securing mineral resources, and that's what effectively is doing. But it's Congo in Africa, which is a source of mineral resources that the US Needs for its automotive and electronics industries and has become extremely insecure because of a rebel forces that has taken a large part of the mining areas. So initially, Prince is helping really the government getting financial capacity to fight these groups and as a result, export more of its production potentially for the U.S.
A
The White House declined to comment on Prince's ties to the administration. Coming up, in the latest installment in our Price of Parenting series, we hear how the rising cost of child care is hitting family budgets and leading to a drag on the overall economy. That's after the break.
C
Hey, guys, it's Ceedee Lamb, wide receiver for the Dallas Cowboys. I'm partnering with Abercrombie this season to tell you all about their viral denim. All you need to know is denim should fit like this. My jeans need to check a lot of boxes fit first, trend second. They need to go with whatever I'm feeling. And Abercrombie Denim has it down whether I'm throwing on a tee or putting the whole fit together. Shop Abercrombie Denim in the app, online and in store.
A
Now. This week, we're putting a special focus on all the tricky financial decisions that parents face in 2025, not least the soaring cost of childcare globally. In the U.S. care for one child can easily top 10 or $15,000 a year. The costs keep climbing too. Outpacing wage growth in most states. And the effects are tangible. A disproportionate number of women never return to the workforce after having kids, leading to a drag productivity and growth. So what can be done to fix the cost of child care? Economics reporter Tping Chen spoke to our supervising producer and mother of two, Sandra Koffing.
G
Firstly, how did childcare in the US get so expensive?
D
Fundamentally, child care is expensive and has gotten even more so because child care relies on people. So if you are running a daycare center, you have very strict staffing regulations that you have to abide by. And so you are just really constrained in terms of what you can do with payroll. And you are going to have to spend a lot on people to take care of the people that you are charged with. And so in a lot of places, that might mean a ratio of 4 to 1 in a baby room. Childcare businesses are not like other businesses where they can skimp on their labor costs and find other ways to get more efficient or productive. You can't hire a robot to change a diaper or give a kid a hug. And so we have seen the cost of childcare really soar in recent years. And a lot of that is because the cost of hiring workers has also gotten a lot more expensive.
G
And I mean, it's not just that expensive in the US it's really a problem across the globe in developed countries. You've been speaking to a bunch of experts about what to do about those rising childcare costs. What are some of the ideas that they have?
D
It's expensive, and also there often isn't availability. The wait list can often be really extensive. Many places aren't well served, period. This burden of paying for care falls most heavily on young parents, who are often the least equipped to afford it because they're just starting out in their careers. And so one way that a lot of researchers and economists say that the country could address it is if the government did more to finance it, which is the way a lot of other developed nations have gone about it. And that could take a lot of forms. It could mean it expanding the threshold at which families could receive assistance up more into the middle class, which, because childcare is so expensive, it is often out of reach. Even for people that we don't think of as living in poverty or really needing government assistance. You could go towards more of a universal system. The government is absolutely one source that could step into and fill some of that gap. And so if we want to ultimately make child care more accessible, that definitely takes resources and in today's political climate especially, that might not be so feasible. That said, if you look at the landscape here in the US you do see a lot of experimentation at the state level trying to figure out how to make this work, because childcare is, of course, an issue that affects family, and it also very much affects local economies. And so you do see a lot of businesses in different states trying to figure out solutions and different policymakers experimenting with efforts to make childcare more accessible. So New Mexico, for example, is paying for its program through oil and gas revenue. One of the proposals that you will hear from economists and others to try and address what is really a fundamental imbalance in the system is actually to try and pay workers more. Because it's by doing that that you can, in some cases, actually manage to keep centers open and increase the access to childcare and try and shorten some of those wait lists, which in areas can be for an infant, could be years. There are certainly other things that we could do as a country and governments can do that don't necessarily involve throwing more money into the system. Some of those efforts could look like giving breaks on property taxes to entrepreneurs who want to start daycares in their own homes, which is a really common way that a lot of childcare is provided.
G
I wonder, is there a role here for the private sector in which we could potentially see more employers having childcare options as a part of their benefit system?
D
Absolutely. And we have seen that already in recent years seeing more employers, including more blue collar employers, starting to offer more childcare options or backup options, because businesses do recognize that childcare or the lack of it, can really be a crippling factor. If you have a workforce who can't come to work sometimes because their childcare has fallen through, and if you are struggling to hire because you have so many people who are staying home, there's a clear benefit for a lot of employers here.
G
Tepping Chen is an economics reporter for the Journal Tipping. Thank you so much for joining me today.
D
Thank you for having me.
A
And that's it for what's news for this Thursday morning. Today's show's produced by Kate Bullivant and Caitlin McCabe. Our supervising producer was Daniel Bark. I'm Azhar Sucri for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back tonight with a new show. Until then, thanks for listening.
D
Sat.
Episode: Meta Freezes AI Hiring After Talent Spending Blitz
Host: Azhar Sukri (Wall Street Journal)
Main Theme:
A packed episode covering Meta’s abrupt AI hiring freeze, the new global reach of Erik Prince’s security ventures, the economic and political climate facing Fed chief Jerome Powell, and an in-depth look at how soaring childcare costs are reshaping American family life and labor force participation.
[00:33–02:20]
“I think one possible culprit is just growing anxieties that AI is becoming a bit frothy. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, said recently that AI has some bubble-like characteristics.” — Caitlin McCabe [02:28]
[03:01–04:33]
“He’s just completely focused on finishing his job and on getting the policy right…He wants to turn over the job next spring to his successor with inflation under control and the economy in a good position.” — Nick Timiraos [04:34]
[05:02–07:51]
“So it’s very different from the Bush era, where the US government would foot the bill…This time, Prince is being funded by local governments.” — Benoit Faucon, WSJ Correspondent [06:47]
“The White House declined to comment on Prince's ties to the administration.” — Azhar Sukri [07:51]
[08:48–13:52]
Feature in the “Price of Parenting” series
“You can't hire a robot to change a diaper or give a kid a hug. And so we have seen the cost of childcare really soar in recent years.” — Sandra Koffing [09:59]
“One of the proposals…is actually to try and pay workers more. Because it’s by doing that you can, in some cases, actually manage to keep centers open and increase the access to childcare and try and shorten some of those wait lists” — Sandra Koffing [12:38]
“We have seen that already in recent years, seeing more employers, including more blue collar employers, starting to offer more childcare options or backup options, because businesses do recognize that childcare or the lack of it, can really be a crippling factor.” — Sandra Koffing [13:20]
“AI has some bubble-like charact[eristics].” — Caitlin McCabe quoting Sam Altman [02:28]
“You have all of these attacks on Powell…which really are trying to undermine the institution…” — Nick Timiraos [03:51]
“You can't hire a robot to change a diaper or give a kid a hug.” — Sandra Koffing [09:59]
Tone & Language:
The episode maintains the WSJ’s brisk, data-driven, and explanatory tone, with moments of candid analysis and real-world testimonials.
Summary Use:
This recap provides a full narrative of the episode, highlighting essential stories shaping business, public policy, and family economics—valuable for listeners who missed the episode or want a concise reference.