Loading summary
Azhar Sukri
The Supreme Court says President Trump can remove leaders of independent government agencies, except the Fed. Plus, Wall street embraces crypto as US Banks team up to issue a stablecoin. And we look at whether China's efforts to shore up its high tech industries means the world's second largest economy can go it alone.
Brian Spiegel
Every step in the process now within the Chinese ecosystem is increasingly dominated by Chinese. That is something that is very frustrating for the US Government in particular. And at the same time, the Chinese government is not apologizing for this at all.
Azhar Sukri
It's Friday, May 23rd. I'm Azhar Sukri for the Wall Street Journal, filling in for Luke Vargas. And here is the AM Edition of what's news, the top headlines and business stories moving your world. Today, the Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump can remove leaders of independent government agencies, but crucially, not the reserve. And while the ruling doesn't explicitly prevent Trump from firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell or any other member of the central bank, the Journal's Chelsea Delaney says it does provide some relief to market participants worried about the Fed's independence.
Chelsea Delaney
Trump's threats in recent months to fire the Fed chair have really shaken investors. We did see a big sell off when he was making those threats in April. He's walked them back. But there probably was still an overhang of anxiety, anxiety among investors about whether the Fed would be able to maintain this independence. So this order definitely will ease some of those concerns. But US Markets are on really shaky ground right now. And as well, the Supreme Court order would expand presidential power. Right now, the president is doing a lot of things that investors are worried about with that presidential power. So it could also fuel some concerns about future use of this newly expanded power.
Azhar Sukri
A man charged with murdering two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, D.C. told investigators he, quote, did it for Palestine and Gaza. Court documents unsealed yesterday show Elias Rodriguez, age 31, had flown in from Chicago, where he lives, earlier this week. The charges against Rodriguez carry a possible death penalty. The Trump administration's move to yesterday block Harvard University from enrolling foreign students in an ongoing dispute over anti Semitism has drawn widespread criticism, with the American Council on Education saying the action was unlikely to withstand legal scrutiny. And now a government investigation has made new findings against Columbia. It says the Ivy League university violated federal civil rights law by ignoring the harassment of Jewish students by classmates. The Department of Health and Human Services civil rights office said the school acted with, quote, deliberate indifference towards student on student harassment of Jewish students since the October 7, 2023 Hamas led attack on Israel. A Columbia spokesperson said the school takes these issues seriously and will work with the government to address them. We are exclusively reporting that major US Banks are explo whether to team up to issue a joint stablecoin. Conversations are in the early stages but have involved payment companies co owned by the likes of JPMorgan Chase, bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo, among others. Journal reporter Angus Berwick says that by potentially issuing a digital coin pegged to a real world currency, banks are trying to fend off escalating competition from the crypto industry.
Stephen Wilmot
Stablecoins have been this huge success story over the last few years. They've become very useful for people kind of moving money internationally, particularly when there are still significant frictions within the traditional banking system. What the banks are seeing is this stablecoin business model at some point could start infringing on their own. They also feel encouraged that there is stablecoin legislation which is currently moving through Congress. And I think the big banks now see that it's a good moment for them to try to reclaim some of this new economy.
Azhar Sukri
This comes as President Trump reaffirmed his commitment to making the US a crypto capital by hosting owners of his meme coin for a gala dinner last night. Government watchdog groups have said the dinner could potentially violate federal rules against soliciting gifts. According to Inca Digital, a blockchain analytics firm, some $148 million worth of Trump coin was PA purchased by investors to win spots at the dinner. Yesterday, White House press secretary Caroline Levitt denied that his dinner would trigger any ethics violations because, quote, all the president's assets are in a blind trust which is managed by his children. Shares of Chinese drugmaker Jiangsu Heng Ri Pharmaceuticals soared more than 30% on their Hong Kong debut today, marking one of the city's largest initial public offerings so far this year. The red hot IPO market in Hong Kong is largely being driven by Chinese firms seeking secondary listings in the first quarter of the year. Listings in the financial hub quadrupled from a year ago to 18.7 billion HKD. Tesla's sales continue to slump in Europe, with Chinese automaker BYD outselling Elon Musk's EV maker for the first time last month. Our European autos reporter Stephen Wilmot says it's both a sign of Tesla's unpopularity and BYD's rapid expansion in Europe.
Caroline Levitt
Tesla's had a very bad start to the year. It's partly to do with Elon Musk, the chief executive's political interventions in Europe. His support for the AfD party in Germany, the largest EV market. In particular, there's also the matter of the Model Y switchover, which has affected production at the plant in Brandenburg. But then the other thing is the rise of Chinese carmakers, and particularly BYD. Despite tariffs, it's paying almost 30% tariff on imports to the European Union these days, but it's still growing very strongly. One caveat to that is that Tesla's monthly data is quite volatile. It tends to oversupply in certain months and undersupply in others. So it might be a different ranking next month and the month after.
Azhar Sukri
Coming up, China has been shoring up advanced technologies long before the trade war began. We look at just how resilient Beijing is after the break.
Kate Bullivant
Save the date for the future of everything and join the Wall Street Journal this May 28th and 29th, 2025 at the Glass House in New York City. The Journal's premier live event returns with leading voices across business, tech, sports and beyond to answer the most pressing question of the present day. As human life expectancy increases, how will we work, spend and plan for an AI enabled future? As a podcast listener, enjoy 20% off current ticket rates with code PODCAST. Visit WSJ.com foepodcast to secure your spot.
Azhar Sukri
Washington and Beijing may have agreed to a truce in their trade war, but China has for years been busy building a great wall of economic self sufficiency around itself. Even before President Trump imposed tariffs on Chinese imports during his first term, China had already ident several high tech areas where it wanted to become less reliant on the outside world. Those efforts have only grown in recent years and as senior correspondent Brian Spiegel writes, continue to accelerate under Trump 2.0. And Brian joins us now. Brian, take us through some of the ways that Beijing has been becoming more self reliant. It's already become competitive with the west in several key high tech areas, hasn't it?
Brian Spiegel
Yeah, that's right. And this is something that's across the board in the Chinese economy. I've lived in Beijing a long time and a day in Beijing looks like this. You get up and you get onto your cell phone, you get onto WeChat, the super app here, and you get on your Chinese ride hailing app and a Chinese electric car comes and picks you up. The telephone itself might be from Huawei, run by a Chinese semiconductor. Every step in the process now within the Chinese ecosystem is increasingly dominated by Chinese companies. And that's not how it was until very recently actually.
Azhar Sukri
No, absolutely not that long Ago there were a lot more foreign names than there are now. So Brian, how are Western governments, and in particular the US responding?
Brian Spiegel
So I think one of the challenges of the self sufficiency drive is that the risk is that there is less space for American or Western companies writ large to operate in China. So it's one thing, yes, Chinese companies are going to become more competitive in their home market. That's a natural process. But I think what frustrates the United States in particular is that things like subsidies, startups in many of these industries, it's not market driven in many ways. I mean, we look at electric vehicles, for example. There's billions and billions upon billions of dollars in subsidies every year. How does an American car company compete with that? That is something that is very frustrating for the US Government in particular. And at the same time the Chinese government, they're not apologizing for this at all.
Azhar Sukri
But can China ever become fully self sufficient? And if not, why not?
Brian Spiegel
Yeah, there's two questions we need to unpack here. One is can they, as you ask, and then the second question is, should they? So on the first part, there's many, many areas of the Chinese economy where complete and total self sufficiency is next to impossible. Take food security for example. China has over a billion people to feed and a finite amount of arable land in the country. They have to import food and they are working as hard as they can to bring down their reliance on food imports. But at the end of the day, it's going to be very difficult to drop that number to zero. On the second part, should they countries going back for many, many centuries in history, they trade for a reason. Because it's impossible to have competitive advantage in every industry, every step of the process, all of the time. Even for a manufacturing powerhouse like China, it's economically very, very difficult to do and to pull that off. So I think one of the things that's very much worth considering is as they pursue self sufficiency, is to question does this make economic sense for China? And despite the fact that we do see progress on the ground every day in their ability to have technological self reliance, at the same time, the economy is not necessarily benefiting from it. It's not necessarily leading to better economic performance in China.
Azhar Sukri
So let me just pick you up on that last point. What are some of the downsides for China in this self sufficiency drive?
Brian Spiegel
The reality is that there's a lot of waste when you earmark certain sectors as the central government does, saying we are going to become self reliant in these sectors. And then the state run financial institutions are effectively mandated to go out and lend to these sectors. You get a lot of redundancy. Hundreds of billions of dollars could rush into a sector over the course of a number of years. And you know, I think of one economist I was speaking to for this article, they made a point that, yes, you can grow rice in a California desert if you spend enough money, but it doesn't necessarily make it good economic policy. So that misallocation of capital is something we really need to consider as we think about the long term health of the Chinese economy related to this effort.
Azhar Sukri
Journal senior correspondent Brian Spiegel, thank you so much.
Brian Spiegel
Thank you.
Azhar Sukri
And that's it for what's news for this Friday morning. Today's show was produced by Kate Bullivant and Daniel Bark. Our supervising producer is Sandra Kilhoff. I'm Azhar Sucri for the Wall Street Journal, filling in for Luke Vargas. We'll be back tonight with a new show. Until then, have a great weekend and thanks for listening.
WSJ What’s News Podcast Episode Summary – "Supreme Court Blocks Trump From Firing Fed Chair" (May 23, 2025)
In the May 23, 2025 episode of "WSJ What’s News," hosted by Azhar Sukri, listeners are presented with a comprehensive overview of pivotal developments in U.S. politics, global finance, the cryptocurrency market, and China’s technological advancements. The episode delves into the Supreme Court's landmark decision restricting presidential authority over the Federal Reserve, the evolving stance of Wall Street on cryptocurrency, significant legal actions against major U.S. universities, and shifts within the European automotive industry.
The episode opens with a significant Supreme Court decision that curtails President Donald Trump’s ability to dismiss leaders of independent government agencies, specifically excluding the Federal Reserve. Azhar Sukri (00:03) introduces the ruling by stating:
"The Supreme Court says President Trump can remove leaders of independent government agencies, except the Fed."
Chelsea Delaney from the Wall Street Journal provides analysis on the market implications of this decision (01:20):
“Trump's threats in recent months to fire the Fed chair have really shaken investors. We did see a big sell-off when he was making those threats in April. He's walked them back. But there probably was still an overhang of anxiety... So this order definitely will ease some of those concerns. But US Markets are on really shaky ground right now.”
Delaney further explains that while the ruling offers relief regarding the Fed's independence, it simultaneously expands presidential power, potentially heightening investor concerns about future executive actions.
The podcast highlights several significant legal and governmental actions:
Murder Charge Against Elias Rodriguez: A man charged with murdering two Israeli embassy staffers in Washington, D.C., confessed his motives were linked to support for Palestine and Gaza (02:04). Rodriguez, aged 31, faces severe charges, including the possibility of the death penalty.
Harvard University Enrollment Blockade: The Trump administration has blocked Harvard University from enrolling foreign students amid ongoing disputes over anti-Semitism. This move has drawn widespread criticism, with the American Council on Education questioning its legal viability (02:04).
Columbia University Investigation: A government investigation revealed that Columbia University violated federal civil rights laws by neglecting the harassment of Jewish students by their peers. The Department of Health and Human Services cited “deliberate indifference” in handling these issues since the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel. Columbia has committed to addressing these challenges (02:04).
A major focus of the episode is Wall Street's strategic engagement with cryptocurrency. Major U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo, are in early discussions to issue a stablecoin pegged to real-world currencies. Angus Berwick reports on this initiative (02:04), highlighting its aim to counteract the growing competition from the crypto sector.
Stephen Wilmot elaborates on the banks' motivations behind this move (03:57):
“Stablecoins have been this huge success story over the last few years... The banks are trying to fend off escalating competition from the crypto industry.”
Wilmot also points out that the ongoing stablecoin legislation in Congress has further encouraged banks to reclaim a segment of the digital economy. Additionally, the episode touches on President Trump's efforts to position the U.S. as a crypto capital, including hosting a gala dinner for meme coin owners. However, this event has raised potential ethics concerns regarding federal rules against soliciting gifts. White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt addressed these concerns (04:31):
"All the president's assets are in a blind trust which is managed by his children."
A substantial portion of the episode is dedicated to China's pursuit of economic self-reliance, particularly in high-tech industries. Brian Spiegel provides an in-depth analysis (07:33) of how Chinese companies dominate various sectors within the domestic ecosystem:
"Every step in the process now within the Chinese ecosystem is increasingly dominated by Chinese companies... Chinese government is not apologizing for this at all." (00:26)
Spiegel discusses the implications of China's self-sufficiency drive, questioning both its feasibility and economic rationale. He points out that complete independence is unattainable in areas like food security due to China's large population and limited arable land. Moreover, the push for self-reliance often leads to economic inefficiencies and misallocation of capital, as government-mandated subsidies flood specific sectors without guaranteeing economic benefits (09:40, 09:46, 11:02).
The episode reports on the robust initial public offering (IPO) activity in Hong Kong, exemplified by the successful debut of Chinese drugmaker Jiangsu Heng Ri Pharmaceuticals. The company's shares surged by over 30% on their Hong Kong listing, marking one of the city's largest IPOs of the year (02:04). This surge is part of a broader trend where Chinese companies seek secondary listings, causing Hong Kong’s IPO market to quadruple year-over-year to reach 18.7 billion HKD (02:04).
Another key topic addressed is the decline in Tesla’s sales in Europe, with Chinese automaker BYD surpassing Elon Musk’s electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer. Caroline Levitt provides insights into this shift (05:59):
“Tesla's had a very bad start to the year. It's partly to do with Elon Musk, the chief executive's political interventions in Europe... Despite tariffs, it's paying almost 30% tariff on imports to the European Union these days, but it's still growing very strongly.”
Levitt attributes Tesla’s challenges to CEO Elon Musk’s political activities in Europe, including support for the AfD party in Germany, as well as operational issues like the Model Y production switchover in Brandenburg. Conversely, BYD continues to expand rapidly in Europe despite facing significant import tariffs. Levitt also notes the volatility in Tesla’s monthly sales data, suggesting that market positions may fluctuate in the near future (05:59).
The "WSJ What’s News" episode provides listeners with a thorough and engaging analysis of critical events shaping the economic and political landscape. From the Supreme Court's decision impacting Federal Reserve independence and the strategic embrace of cryptocurrency by major U.S. banks, to China's relentless push for technological self-sufficiency and shifting dynamics in the European automotive market, the episode offers valuable insights and expert commentary. Whether you're a market participant or simply interested in global developments, this episode delivers a comprehensive overview of the forces driving today's headlines.