
Loading summary
Unknown Speaker 1
In an age of unprecedented disruption and opportunity, success depends on what you do with your data and how fast you do it. This is the era of AI. This is the era of kx KX Survival of the Fastest.
Alex Osola
What we learned from the new Trump team's War Chat texts that the Atlantic has released. Plus, the president is set to announce his plans for tariffs on the automotive industry. And when confronted with Trump's tariffs, US Allies face a agree to his demands or fight back.
Vipal Monga
It's a game of psychology at this point. People are just trying to read Trump because I think everyone realizes in the end that despite the people around him, the only guy who makes a decision is Trump ultimately. So they are trying to use whatever levers they think work with this very complicated man.
Alex Osola
It's Wednesday, March 26th. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. This is the PM edition of what's News, the top headlines and business stories the that move the world today. President Trump is set to announce later today tariffs on automobiles. The tariffs are expected to be narrower than the administration once envisioned and are expected to apply to finished vehicles coming into the US but not automotive parts. Trump said for months that he would impose reciprocal tariffs on April 2 that would equalize U.S. tariffs with those other countries charge. But he has suggested in recent days that some countries might not be subject to duties equal to what they charge. An administration official said the White House is considering a plan that would offer nations some lenience. Later in the show, we'll talk about the dilemma facing governments on the receiving end of US Tariffs. The news about the US Automotive tariff plans weighed on stocks, with automaker shares coming under pressure. General Motors and Stellantis have been among the hardest hit, though Ford Motor has held up better. Meanwhile, new data out today showed that durable Goods orders rose 0.9% in February, blowing past expectations for a 1% decline. That wasn't enough to keep major U.S. indexes afloat today. The Dow fell about 0.3%, the S&P 500 dipped about 1.1%, and the Nasdaq ended the day down about 2%. The Atlantic magazine has released more texts from the Signal Group chat with Trump administration cabinet members, in which Editor in Chief Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally included. The texts show that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted plans for the timing and weapons to be used in a military strike against Houthi militants at least two hours before the bombs were scheduled to drop. Testifying Before Congress today, U.S. national Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard denied that the information shared in the chat was classified. The conversation was candid and sensitive, but as the President, National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations, or war plans that were shared. For more on the texts and their implications, I'm joined by National Security reporter Alex Ward. So, Alex, what did we learn from these texts that were released today?
Alex Ward
Oh, oh, so much. There were attack plans discussed in this chain. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth Beckman basically said, look, guys, these fighter jets are leaving at this time. They might bomb at this specific time. And then National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, he said, hey, we've found out that actually one of these targets was successfully eliminated, AKA killed. This is the kind of conversation you have in the secure rooms of the Pentagon, in the situation room of the White House. You do not have this on Signal, which is an unclassified venue, and it's publicly available, and. And it's on unclassified phones that presumably people can hack and get access to.
Alex Osola
So let's talk about this designation of classified, because there's already been quite a lot of debate about this. Tulsi Gabbard, as we just heard, as well as other members of the administration have said, the information shared in this Signal group chat was not classified. Would information like this that was shared, that we have screenshots for, normally be classified?
Alex Ward
Literally, any former official who's dealt with this from any administration, Republican or Democrat, would tell you this is classified information. It strains credulity that this was at any point unclassified. There's also guidance from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the office that Tulsi Gabbard leads from September of 2024, which basically provides guidance as to how one should classify information. And it could not be clearer that information about ongoing future current attacks need to be designated, at least at the top secret level. So that is classified. The complication here is the Secretary of Defense does have the authority to declassify classified information, but it's very unlikely that Hegseth did that in order to post it in the Signal chat. And when asked about it during his trip to the Indo Pacific region, did not answer that question directly. He was given a chance to say, yes, I declassified it, and he did not say that. And so now the administration's argument is all about, well, the Atlantic reported it was war plans, and these were attack plans. Attack plans are arguably more sensitive because you're literally being specific down to the unit level. So when the administration says, well, actually these weren't war plans, these were attack plans, what they're really saying is it's not bad, it's worse.
Alex Osola
What happens next.
Alex Ward
Right now there are calls for heads to roll here. You know, Mike Waltz has been in the crosshairs for being the one to start the group and put Jeffrey Goldberg into it. But now it seems like attention is turning toward Hegseth because he is the one that did put in the allegedly classified information. But Trump loves Hegseth and is seen by many as kind of one of the closest top aides that Trump has. And so it's hard to believe Trump would would let him go. Also, that would necessitate another Senate confirmation fight to replace him. Whereas, say, if they were to fire Waltz, they would not need a Senate confirmation fight because that position is not Senate confirmable.
Alex Osola
That was national security reporter Alex Ward and the Journal has broken down the text between the White House officials. You can find an annotated analysis of the group chat texts on WSJ.com we'll leave a link in the show. Notes Coming up, are countries fighting back against Trump's tariffs making more headway with the president than those that don't retaliate? That's after the break. With the Venmo debit card, you can turn the spa day that your friends paid you back for into concert tickets that you can earn up to 5% cash back on, where spa day with the girls becomes concert tickets. Visit Venmo Me Debit to learn more. The Venmo MasterCard is issued by the Bancorp Bank MA pursuant to license by MasterCard International, Inc. Terms apply DOSH cash back terms apply. President Trump's trade war is forcing America's closest allies to choose between fighting back or acquiescing. The trouble is nobody's figured out which is the best way to get Trump to do what they want. The Trump administration plans to move forward with a list of what the president calls reciprocal tariffs on April 2, a date Trump has called Liberation Day. Should US allies agree to Trump's demands or fight back? Vipal Monga is our Canada correspondent and joins me now from Toronto. Vipal, how are US Allies approaching this dilemma?
Vipal Monga
So Canada has taken a very strong position against the tariffs. They've immediately come out of the gate and said they're going to retaliate dollar for dollar. And they're specifically trying to target red states that they feel will hurt Republicans and get those Republicans to talk to Trump and get him to back off. The European Union also has decided to go for retaliatory tariffs and they making the same calculation as Canada to Some extent, they think that Trump is a bully and bullies don't particularly respect people who roll over. So you've got to hit back, punch him in the mouth is the attitude. And it's early to say whether that works or not. We do know that he's a very emotional leader and when people do retaliate, he has not reacted well in the past.
Alex Osola
Okay, so that's the fight back approach. Let's talk about the softer approach.
Vipal Monga
So Mexico also has a lot at stake. In theory, as much at stake as Canada does. But Mexico has decided not to retaliate for now. President Claudia Sheinbaum, she's very forceful with Trump, apparently in the calls, but extremely respectful when they talk. And they've decided not to hit back in the hopes that what they're creating is an environment where Trump goes easier on them when he finally comes out with his full slate of tariffs.
Alex Osola
The UK has said that they're not going to retaliate in any way. They seem to be happy to mollify Trump. Right.
Vipal Monga
The UK has a lot at stake because since Brexit, they've been trying to create trade deals with the US world's largest economy in a way to help fix their own economic problems.
Alex Osola
What is the calculus that these leaders are making between the short term approach and the longer term impact of some of these tariffs?
Vipal Monga
It's a game of psychology at this point. People are just trying to read Trump because I think everyone realizes in the end that despite the people around him, the only guy who makes a decision is Trump ultimately. So they are trying to use whatever levers they think work with this very complicated man. Now, that's in the short term. In the longer term, a few of the people I've talked to, particularly in Canada, think that Trump's strategic approach has been terrible. There's a theory that if you cook the frog slowly, they won't notice they're being cooked. But what Trump did was he turned up the heat all the way and the frog is effectively totally cooked. And what this has done is made the country's leaders, all of them, focus on things that they've avoided for the past, which is building up their own industrial capacity, building out trade agreements with other countries like Europe, finding other sources for their resources than the United States. So in the longer term, this could really hurt the US's position in the world as other countries realize that they need other sources, other markets to look to.
Alex Osola
That was WSJ reporter Vipal Manga. Thank you, Vipal.
Vipal Monga
Thanks.
Alex Osola
Each new car model, Ford Motor designs is first sculpted out of clay before being passed on to engineers for testing. It's a useful but also time consuming process. Brian Goodman, the company's director of artificial intelligence, is now pushing forward a number of use cases for artificial intelligence at the company in an effort to design and engineer new cars as quickly as Ford's competitors. Enterprise technology reporter Isabel Bousquet told our Tech News Briefing podcast about how that's been working for the company.
Isabel Bousquet
Ford's strategy is essentially to build its own data centers and buy its own GPUs, and it's been doing that for a while. Ford has been coming to this Nvidia conference for the last 10 years. They have a close relationship with Nvidia and they've been buying these Nvidia chips and filling their own data centers with them. And they feel like that gives them the opportunity to not be reliant on the cloud providers. They don't have to wait for that capacity. They don't have to worry about what that capacity might cost today versus what it might cost tomorrow. They have their set costs and yeah, they're continuing to buy GPUs and build out that infrastructure.
Alex Osola
To hear more about Ford's AI strategy, listen to today's episode of Tech News Briefing. And finally, do you know women who were single and not looking? Turns out that's kind of a thing. More American women than ever are on their own and aren't looking to get married. On our your Money Briefing podcast, economics reporter Rachel Wolf explained what's driving this shift.
Rachel Wolf
What I found is that the this trend is not just something that's going on in people's heads. It's not just a product of having expectations that are too high. It's a product of real and huge demographic shifts between men and women. Both men and women are struggling to find what they're looking for, but women are more likely to report that it's causing them to swerve the search altogether and to deprioritize romance in favor of focusing on things like their friendships and their careers.
Alex Osola
To hear more on this story, listen to today's episode of youf Money Briefing. And that's what's news for this Wednesday afternoon. Today's show is produced by Pierre Bienname and Anthony Bansy with supervising producer Michael Kasmides. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning. Thanks for list.
WSJ What’s News: “Surrender or Resist? The Dilemma Facing Allies Caught in Trump’s Trade War” – March 26, 2025
Host: Alex Osola
Guest Speakers: Vipal Monga (Canada Correspondent), Alex Ward (National Security Reporter)
Overview:
In today’s episode, Alex Osola delves into President Trump's impending announcement of new tariffs on the automotive industry. Initially envisioned as broader, the tariffs are now expected to target only finished vehicles imported into the U.S., sparing automotive parts. This strategic adjustment has significant implications for both domestic industries and international trade relations.
Key Details:
Notable Quote:
"President Trump is set to announce later today tariffs on automobiles… but he has suggested in recent days that some countries might not be subject to duties equal to what they charge." – Alex Osola [00:49]
Overview:
The Wall Street Journal highlights the release of confidential texts from the Trump administration’s Signal Group chat by The Atlantic. These communications reveal sensitive discussions about military strikes, raising serious concerns about information security and classification protocols within the administration.
Key Points:
Notable Quotes:
*"This is the kind of conversation you have in the secure rooms of the Pentagon, in the situation room of the White House. You do not have this on Signal…" – Alex Ward [03:10]
"It strains credulity that this was at any point unclassified." – Alex Ward [04:10]
Overview:
Vipal Monga, the Wall Street Journal’s Canada correspondent, explores how U.S. allies are navigating the dilemma posed by Trump's tariffs. Countries are strategizing whether to comply with tariff demands or retaliate, each approach carrying its own set of risks and long-term implications.
Key Points:
Canada’s Stance:
European Union:
Mexico’s Approach:
United Kingdom:
Strategic Implications:
Notable Quote:
"It's a game of psychology at this point… they are trying to use whatever levers they think work with this very complicated man." – Vipal Monga [09:16]
Overview:
Vipal Monga further elaborates on the long-term consequences of Trump's aggressive tariff strategies. The sustained trade conflict is prompting allies to reassess and strengthen their own industrial capacities and trade agreements, potentially diminishing the U.S.'s influence in global markets.
Key Points:
Impact on Industrial Strategy:
Shift in Global Trade Dynamics:
Future of U.S. Influence:
Notable Quote:
"What Trump did was he turned up the heat all the way and the frog is effectively totally cooked. And what this has done is made the country's leaders… focus on things that they've avoided for the past, which is building up their own industrial capacity." – Vipal Monga [09:16]
Overview:
Shifting to technology, the podcast highlights Ford Motor Company's strategic investment in artificial intelligence to accelerate vehicle design and engineering. By building proprietary data centers and acquiring GPUs, Ford aims to outpace competitors through enhanced AI capabilities.
Key Insights:
Infrastructure Development:
Strategic Independence:
Competitive Edge:
Notable Quote:
"Ford's strategy is essentially to build its own data centers and buy its own GPUs… they don't have to wait for that capacity. They don't have to worry about what that capacity might cost today versus what it might cost tomorrow." – Isabel Bousquet [10:28]
Overview:
In the realm of social economics, the podcast discusses a growing trend among American women who choose to remain single and prioritize careers and friendships over marriage. This shift is attributed to significant demographic changes and evolving personal priorities.
Key Points:
Demographic Shifts:
Prioritizing Personal Goals:
Impact on Society:
Notable Quote:
"Both men and women are struggling to find what they're looking for, but women are more likely to report that it's causing them to swerve the search altogether and to deprioritize romance in favor of focusing on things like their friendships and their careers." – Rachel Wolf [11:56]
In this multifaceted episode, WSJ What’s News provides an in-depth analysis of President Trump's ongoing trade war, the complex decisions faced by U.S. allies, and the broader implications for global economic dynamics. Additionally, the podcast highlights significant developments in technology with Ford's AI initiatives and sheds light on emerging social trends affecting demographic structures. Through expert interviews and detailed reporting, listeners gain a comprehensive understanding of the current economic and social landscape.
References: