Transcript
Luke Vargas (0:03)
Mark Zuckerberg looks to the White House for help as he fights an EU law that could undermine Meta's ad business. Plus, a day before the unveiling of sweeping US Tariffs, we hear a case for the president's trade agenda.
Oren Cass (0:16)
Well, in some respects, you need a permanent policy. You need a change in just the baseline American economic strategy, which for decades now has been free trade. And so step one is that baseline shift that says, no, the default is now, actually, we are going to use tariffs if trade is imbalanced.
Luke Vargas (0:33)
And Trump pledges a crackdown on price gouging in the ticket market. It's Tuesday, April 1st. I'm Luke Vargas for the Wall Street Journal and here is the AM Edition of what's news, the top headlines and business stories moving your world. Today, President Trump says he has settled on a plan for his latest batch of tariffs due to be announced tomorrow, but for now is keeping those plans close to the vest. Among one of the options he's been weighing is whether to apply a universal tariff of up to 20% on all imports or take a so called reciprocal tariff approach that would levy individual tariff rates on specific countries subject to negotiation. As we await details, we spoke to someone with a strong sense about why Trump and his allies are leaning so hard on a tariff strategy. Oren Cass is the founder of the conservative populist think tank American Compass, which since its establishment in 2020 has become the most influential group Capitol Hill among the pro Trump policy movement that calls itself the New Right. He's also a longtime friend of Vice President J.D. vance, and I began by asking him to summarize the various use cases for tariffs.
Oren Cass (1:47)
Sure. Well, I think the most important thing to recognize is that tariffs can both be an economic policy. Let's say, you know, we want to encourage domestic manufacturing, we want to try to reduce our trade deficit, then we might want to have tariffs in place. But they can also be a negotiating tool, a tool of statecraft that just as we use sanctions, just as we even threaten military force, we can threaten a country with a tariff. So it's important to ask the question, what is the tariff supposed to be doing? And then evaluate it on those terms.
Luke Vargas (2:19)
Is there a risk of maybe muddling the message if you're using tariffs so broadly? It sounds like you see all of those as legitimate uses, but do you need to be clear about why you're wielding each particular tariff?
Oren Cass (2:29)
That's definitely a risk, and I think it's a challenge the administration is facing right now because for political purposes, you need to be Signaling clearly to your domestic audience, you know what you're doing and why. Obviously there are costs also to tariffs. If you're asking people to accept costs, you need to explain why and what they're going to get out of them. It's really important to signal to investors if the goal here is to change where capital gets deployed. And then third, it's really important to be clear to allies, to other countries that we do want to work with. If we are using tariffs to try to, in some cases force them to change their behaviors, to say we want to see changes in your policies that either keep China out, that, you know, reduce your trade surplus with us, they need to know that so that what you're doing doesn't just look like kind of arbitrary axe wielding, but actually comes with a clear if this, then that.
