Loading summary
Michelle Hackman
Did you know? Wall Street Journal's take on the Week, a weekly markets and business podcast, is available on Amazon Music ad free with a Prime membership. To listen, download the Amazon music app for free to catch up on the latest episodes without the ads.
Luke Vargas
Hey, what's news, listeners? It's Sunday, November 17th. I'm Luke Vargas for the Wall Street Journal and this is what's News Sunday, the show where we tackle the big questions about the biggest stories in the news by reaching out to our colleagues across the news to help explain what's happening in our world. Donald Trump's plans to carry out his mass deportation pledge are taking shape. He's picked his so called border czar, tapped an immigration hardliner as his deputy chief of staff, and his advisors are hard at work discussing the details about how an aggressive deportation effort that Trump has said could target as many as 20 million people could be carried out and paid for. So what is the plan? Let's get to it. My Wall Street Journal colleagues Michelle Hackman and Andrew Rastuccia began reporting in May that Donald Trump's allies were already drawing up proposals to make sure candidate Trump's rhetoric on immigration would actually make its way into policy if elected. As a part of those discussions, Tom Homan's name was floated as someone who could help carry out this by serving as a border czar, a position that wouldn't require Senate confirmation. And, and sure enough, we learned this week that Homan is getting that job. The latest signal that Trump's policies really were being plotted out then and that ducks are now being put in a row. Michelle, take us into the plans that we're hearing about, starting with perhaps day one, because it sounds like Trump is ready to hit the ground running here.
Michelle Hackman
So one of the really big questions for how to do a mass deportation is all the available estimates are that if you want to deport millions of people, which governments haven't really been able to do, you'd need tens of billions, possibly even $100 billion to that. And how do you unlock that money? So one of the solutions that they've come up with is that they're going to bring back. Trump did this in his last term. He declared a national emergency at the border. And this is under legal dispute, but they believe doing that would unlock money from the Pentagon that they could start using a to rebuild Trump's border wall and also to pay for some of the things that would be needed for a mass deportation. More officers to do arrests, more detention space to hold people, especially families, if they want to deport people, more planes to actually fl, because, you know, people have been coming to the US from countries around the world. It's a complex operation that they're looking at.
Luke Vargas
Do we know the likely order in which deportations would take place? What are we looking at logistically as this potentially gets underway?
Michelle Hackman
We have a few different data points. Trump has said he wants to deport 20 million people. Well, we don't even know if there are 20 million people in the country illegally that could be deported. Tom Homan, Trump's incoming border czar, has narrowed that significantly. He said his big focuses are immigrants in the country illegally who have also committed another crime, as well as immigrants who have already received a final order of deportation in immigration court. People believe that that number is about 1.3 million people. And between those two populations, that will take a long time to just get through that list.
Luke Vargas
Andrew, I guess there are other groups, right, that have been targeted maybe beyond that. 1.3 million people.
Andrew Rastuccia
Yeah, that's right. Homan has also said in recent days that he plans to ramp up workplace raids around the country to suss out and find people who are living here illegally. So that would be another path through which they would be able to deport people. He has said that he's not planning community by community raids of homes, at least not the moment. But we'll have to wait and see how all that unfolds as the years go by.
Luke Vargas
Some of the struggles that Trump ran into in the first term was that his policies ran into opposition in Democratic run cities and states. To what extent does an effort in the second term here hinge on cooperation from states that might not be on board with this?
Andrew Rastuccia
They're not expecting blue states to all of a sudden come around and cooperate necessarily. They've discussed recruiting local and state officials from nearby red states to potentially do some of this work. And they're also talking about state and local law enforcement, National Guard as well, to carry this out. I mean, it would require thousands and thousands of people around the country to actually make this happen.
Luke Vargas
That certainly sounds like the kind of thing that could get some politicians across the political spectrum incensed, right? Cross border law enforcement participating in this.
Michelle Hackman
You have to imagine that sending people into blue states, the majority of immigrants actually live in blue states in places like New York, California, now Chicago. You know, if you don't have the cooperation of local law enforcement who actually know those communities, that's when you tend to see operations that become a little uglier of people sort of banging down doors of searching through areas where a lot of Latinos live. And so the images of a mass deportation, that's where they could come about.
Luke Vargas
Andrew, in terms of operations, as Michelle mentioned there, that could become a little uglier. Going back to Trump's first term, we saw this pattern of family separation. Has the incoming administration said anything about the possibility that might inevitably follow from a mass deportation effort?
Andrew Rastuccia
They're being a little bit coy about if they would arrive that policy. But Tom Homan, who was just appointed the border czar, was a sort of champion of that policy, dating well before President Trump's first term, way back to the Obama administration, when he was a career government official, he raised that issue of separating children from their families. And now he's in the chair, and he has made no apologies for it. In an interview, he was asked, you know, what's the best way to avoid separating families? And he said, sending the children home with their parents back to their home.
Luke Vargas
Countries, just to go back to logistics here, even 1.3 million people, it's a very large number to deport. Michelle, have we heard any sort of timeline about how quickly the administration thinks this could take place?
Michelle Hackman
I don't think that they've made any promises to that extent. They've set a really lofty goal for themselves. I just want to put in perspective that the last Trump administration tried hard to deport people, and they deported just about 1.2 million across their four years. And only a quarter of those arrests were made inside the country, so three quarters were people who had just crossed the border illegally, who the government was able effectively to just push back across the border or. Or grab as soon as they caught them at the border and fly them back to places like Guatemala. If you're starting at a base of 300,000 people who were in the country who got deported last time, they have a lot of work to do to get up to the numbers that they're talking about.
Luke Vargas
All right, we've got to take a very short break, but when we come back, we'll talk about how all of this would be paid for, whether Trump's deportation plans are likely to meet legal challenges, and much more. Stay with us. We've got a whole lot more details to try and game out about Trump's likely looming deportation effort. Michelle, you mentioned before the break the fact that a lot of arrests occurred outside of the US In Trump's first term. We have been talking about the steps his administration wants to take in the coming months, but this will inevitably again involve other countries. Won't it?
Michelle Hackman
That's right. So in the past when we've talked about mass deportations, we've mostly been deporting to Mexico. But a big change we saw under the Biden administration was that people were crossing the border illegally from all over the world. And so this is going to become a much more complex diplomatic operation of talking to countries, particularly the ones we don't have good relationships with, to sort of coerce them to take back their citizens.
Luke Vargas
Michelle, do we have a sense of some of these other countries that might be engaged?
Michelle Hackman
Yeah. So it's a question of what type of negotiation you're talking about. But one thing that the Trump team is really interested in is creating what are called third safe country agreements with other countries. Trump very briefly tried it with Guatemala, but now they're interested in looking at countries all across Latin America and Africa that the US can essentially pay to take on our asylum seekers.
Luke Vargas
Adding to the complexity of all this, too, and we didn't really get to this before the break, but one group that is potentially being targeted with deportation are those with temporary protected status. That's people who are in the US As a result of fleeing humanitarian situations around the world as far as Ukraine. So sending people back to Central America doesn't seem like it's going to work in every case.
Michelle Hackman
That's right, yeah. And one of the big things is that the Trump team believes a lot of these people who we consider in the country illegally are actually here on some quasi legal humanitarian status that gives them deportation protections. And the thing is that Trump could basically take those away at any moment, and he has promised to do that. He said, I don't believe in temporary protected status that's protecting anyone from Ukrainians to Haitians to Venezuelans. And he's saying, I'm going to end that and take it away. And that makes people vulnerable to deportation. And I think that's something he plans on acting on.
Luke Vargas
Andrew, are we likely to see pushback to any of this from Congress, from the administration, especially if the roster of those targeted with deportation starts to expand, as Michelle was alluding to there?
Andrew Rastuccia
Absolutely. I mean, you'll see aggressive pushback from members of Congress, particularly Democrats, but potentially some moderate Republicans, depending on how far Trump goes. And of course, you'll see legal challenges from Democratic attorneys general, from human rights groups like the aclu. They'll be looking for any sort of mistake in any of these regulations and executive orders that they can take advantage of to overturn them.
Luke Vargas
Michelle, could you expand on what likely legal challenges to this might look like.
Michelle Hackman
I'll give you one example. In the latter part of Trump's first term, he appointed Chad Wolf his acting Homeland Security secretary. But basically he did it wrong. He basically read the org chart wrong, elevated the wrong person. And once people figured that out, they were able to challenge anything that Chad Wolf signed a regulation, a memo, and say that that was issued improperly, and they won all of those cases, and all of those policies got struck down.
Luke Vargas
Andrew, going back to politics, is broad immigration reform in the cards at all, separate from the deportation push we've been talking about here?
Andrew Rastuccia
Lawmakers have been trying to pass broad immigration reform for well over a decade now, and they've largely failed for about 40 years. Yeah, yeah, I should say. Yeah. And they've largely failed in because neither party has a whole lot of incentive to help the other party score this major victory. And that's exactly what happened when Trump swooped in and killed the immigration bill most recently. But they may not need Democrats this time around. They can use a sort of budgetary maneuver called budget reconciliation to at least get the money they need to pass this. And the money that we're talking about is potentially huge. A liberal immigration group estimates that it could be about $88 billion a year to deport every single one of the migrants that are living in the country illegally. So this is a huge amount of money.
Luke Vargas
A huge amount of money, and an action that could itself have an economic impact if millions of people are pulled out of the workforce. Right.
Andrew Rastuccia
Andrew Trump and his team, at least publicly, are pretty dismissive of the economic effects of this. Obviously, we know from talking to economists and immigration analysts that this country depends in part on the work of people living here illegally. And if we overnight or even over the course of a year, removed all these people from the labor market, it could really send some convulsions across the economy.
Luke Vargas
We are fast running out of time. So I'll close with a final question for each of you. Michelle, maybe starting with you, as we look ahead to January and these plans potentially getting underway, what are you preparing for? What are your eyes on as an immigration reporter?
Michelle Hackman
I'll be watching really closely for some of the things I talked about. So what new ideas is this team coming up with to be able to ramp up deportations to much larger levels than they were able to last time? And B, how do they get to most of these immigrants? It's going to be hard if they're living in places where those local officials are refusing to cooperate.
Luke Vargas
Michelle, it sounds like the court's not just in terms of legal challenges to any deportation efforts, but just in terms of the backlog of cases that they've got are going to be one of the real bottlenecks here.
Michelle Hackman
Yeah, immigrants in this country do have some due process rights. If you've been living here for more than a couple years and we arrest you and try to deport you, you have the right to go to court and fight your deportation case. And so right now, those courts are so backlogged that it's taking years to even get to those cases. So the other thing they're going to have to do is either find a way to circumvent that process or try to really, really speed it up so they can get those deportation orders.
Luke Vargas
And Andrew, what elements of this, obvious or otherwise, are you preparing to look into closely?
Andrew Rastuccia
One thing would be the politics of this. So we know from polling that the majority of Americans have been sort of clamoring for some sort of crackdown at the border. The question is, do the Trump people overcorrect? Do they go too far and do they end up doing it in a way that actually repulses voters in the midterms in two years or in the next presidential election?
Luke Vargas
I've been speaking to Wall Street Journal reporters Andrew Ristuccia and Michelle Hackman. Andrew, thank you so much for the time.
Andrew Rastuccia
Thank you.
Luke Vargas
And Michelle, a pleasure as always. Thank you.
Michelle Hackman
Thank you, too.
Luke Vargas
And that's it for what's new Sunday for November 17th. Today's show was produced by Charlotte Gartenberg with Anthony Bansi and with supervising produce producer Christina Rocca and deputy editors Scott Salloway and Chris Sinsley. I'm Luke Vargas and we'll be back tomorrow morning with a brand new show. Until then, thanks for listening.
Podcast Summary: WSJ What’s News – Trump and Illegal Immigration: How Mass Deportations Could Happen
Release Date: November 17, 2024
Introduction
In this episode of WSJ What’s News, host Luke Vargas delves deep into former President Donald Trump's ambitious plans for mass deportations. The discussion unpacks the logistical, financial, and political intricacies of executing such a large-scale immigration policy overhaul. Featuring insights from Wall Street Journal reporters Michelle Hackman and Andrew Rastuccia, the episode offers a comprehensive analysis of how these plans are taking shape, their potential implications, and the challenges they may face.
Trump’s Deportation Strategy and Key Appointments
Luke Vargas kicks off the conversation by highlighting Trump's commitment to enforcing his mass deportation pledge. Central to this effort is the appointment of Tom Homan as the new border czar, a role that strategically sidesteps the need for Senate confirmation.
Notable Quote:
“Homan is getting that job. The latest signal that Trump's policies really were being plotted out and that ducks are now being put in a row.”
— Luke Vargas [00:17]
Michelle Hackman elaborates on the strategic financial planning behind the deportation efforts. She explains that achieving the deportation of millions would require extensive funding, potentially up to $100 billion. One proposed solution is reinstating the national emergency declaration at the border, a tactic Trump employed during his previous term to unlock Pentagon funds for border wall reconstruction and deportation logistics.
Notable Quote:
“They believe doing that would unlock money from the Pentagon that they could start using to rebuild Trump's border wall and also to pay for some of the things that would be needed for a mass deportation.”
— Michelle Hackman [01:46]
Logistical Execution and Prioritization
The discussion shifts to the practical aspects of implementing mass deportations. While Trump has spotlighted the figure of 20 million illegal immigrants, Tom Homan has refined this target to approximately 1.3 million individuals. This group primarily includes those who have committed additional crimes or have irreversibly received final deportation orders from immigration courts.
Notable Quote:
“People believe that that number is about 1.3 million people. And between those two populations, that will take a long time to just get through that list.”
— Michelle Hackman [02:47]
Andrew Rastuccia adds that the administration plans to intensify workplace raids nationwide to identify and deport individuals living illegally. However, Homan has indicated a reluctance to engage in community-by-community raids, at least initially, signaling a strategic approach to enforcement.
Notable Quote:
“Homan has also said in recent days that he plans to ramp up workplace raids around the country to suss out and find people who are living here illegally.”
— Andrew Rastuccia [03:26]
Funding and Economic Considerations
A significant hurdle discussed is the financial burden of mass deportations. The proposed budget reconciliation could facilitate the allocation of the necessary funds. However, estimates suggest that the cost could soar to approximately $88 billion annually, a figure that poses considerable economic implications, including potential disruptions to the labor market due to the sudden removal of millions of workers.
Notable Quote:
“A liberal immigration group estimates that it could be about $88 billion a year to deport every single one of the migrants that are living in the country illegally.”
— Andrew Rastuccia [11:16]
Michelle Hackman points out the challenges in sourcing such immense funding, emphasizing the administration's reliance on repurposed Pentagon funds and the complexities involved in reallocating resources without a clear legislative mandate.
Legal and Political Challenges
The episode delves into the probable legal battles that will arise from Trump's deportation plans. Given the precedent of legal setbacks during Trump's first term—such as challenges to Chad Wolf's appointment—similar obstacles are anticipated. The Wall Street Journal anticipates pushback not only from Democratic legislators but also from human rights organizations and possibly moderate Republicans.
Notable Quote:
“They'll be looking for any sort of mistake in any of these regulations and executive orders that they can take advantage of to overturn them.”
— Andrew Rastuccia [09:27]
Michelle Hackman provides examples of past legal challenges, underscoring the fragility of executive actions in immigration enforcement.
Notable Quote:
“In the latter part of Trump's first term, he appointed Chad Wolf his acting Homeland Security secretary. But basically he did it wrong...all of those policies got struck down.”
— Michelle Hackman [09:55]
International Relations and Third Safe Country Agreements
Executing mass deportations on such a scale necessitates extensive international cooperation. The administration is reportedly interested in establishing "third safe country agreements" with nations across Latin America and Africa. These agreements would potentially involve financial incentives for countries to accept and manage U.S. asylum seekers, thereby alleviating domestic processing burdens.
Notable Quote:
“Trump very briefly tried it with Guatemala, but now they're interested in looking at countries all across Latin America and Africa that the US can essentially pay to take on our asylum seekers.”
— Michelle Hackman [07:54]
Impact on Temporary Protected Status Holders
A contentious aspect of the deportation plan involves individuals with Temporary Protected Status (TPS). Trump has expressed intentions to rescind TPS protections, rendering thousands vulnerable to deportation. This move could have significant humanitarian and diplomatic repercussions, especially for those fleeing from sanctioned humanitarian crises like the war in Ukraine.
Notable Quote:
“Trump could basically take those away at any moment, and he has promised to do that.”
— Michelle Hackman [08:16]
Conclusion and Future Outlook
As the episode wraps up, Hackman and Rastuccia discuss the uncertain timeline and the vast administrative challenges ahead. Michelle emphasizes the current court backlogs as a bottleneck, while Andrew highlights the political risks, including potential voter backlash that could influence upcoming elections.
Notable Quotes:
“Immigrants in this country do have some due process rights...so they'll have to find a way to circumvent that process or try to really, really speed it up so they can get those deportation orders.”
— Michelle Hackman [12:28]
“Do the Trump people overcorrect? Do they go too far and do they end up doing it in a way that actually repulses voters...”
— Andrew Rastuccia [13:21]
Final Thoughts
The WSJ What’s News episode provides a thorough examination of Trump's potential mass deportation strategy, navigating through its fiscal demands, operational logistics, legal vulnerabilities, and broader societal impacts. As the administration gears up to implement these plans, the Wall Street Journal reporters remain vigilant, poised to monitor developments closely in the face of formidable challenges ahead.