Trump Considers Slashing China Tariffs

Summary

WSJ What’s News: Trump Considers Slashing China Tariffs

Release Date: April 23, 2025
Host: The Wall Street Journal
Episode Title: Trump Considers Slashing China Tariffs

---

1. President Trump's Potential Reduction of China Tariffs

Timestamp: [00:33] - [04:28]

The episode opens with an in-depth analysis of President Trump's contemplation to reduce tariffs on Chinese imports, a strategic move aimed at de-escalating the ongoing trade war between the U.S. and China. Alex Osola reports that the Trump administration is mulling over significant tariff reductions, with expectations that these decisions are emerging from the White House's higher echelons. A White House spokesman clarified, “[Tariff] decisions will come directly from the president, and anything else is speculation” (00:39).

Ling Ling Wei, WSJ’s Chief China Correspondent, provides expert insights into the situation. She explains that the administration is not leaning towards a unilateral tariff reduction but is seeking reciprocal concessions from China. Wei outlines the two main strategies under consideration:

• Reducing Tariffs: Lowering the current high tariffs of 145% on Chinese imports to a range of 50%-65%.
• Tiered Tariffs System: Implementing a differentiated tariff structure where non-strategic products face reduced tariffs of 35%, while strategic items remain heavily taxed at 100% (02:04).

When asked about China’s receptiveness, Ling Ling Wei notes that China is open to negotiations but prefers to avoid discussions under pressure. She emphasizes, “What he's considering right now is a small positive sign for de-escalation, but it doesn't fundamentally change the overall dynamics with China” (03:45). This indicates that while the move is a step towards easing tensions, substantial policy shifts remain unlikely without mutual concessions.

2. Impact on U.S. Stock Market and Consumer Prices

Timestamp: [04:36] - [07:00]

Following the news of potential tariff reductions, the U.S. stock market experienced a significant rally. Alex Osola highlights that the Dow rose by over 400 points (1.1%), the S&P 500 increased by approximately 1.7%, and the Nasdaq surged by 2.5% (04:36). This positive movement was attributed to the administration's softened stance on both China and the Federal Reserve, alleviating some of the market's immediate concerns.

Natasha Khan, WSJ Business Reporter, joins the discussion to shed light on how businesses are responding to the tariff changes, particularly regarding pricing strategies. Khan explains that companies face a delicate balance when deciding whether to pass the increased costs onto consumers or absorb them to maintain profit margins. She states, “What we're seeing is that this decision of how much or whether to jack up the prices is really as much of an art as it is science” (05:23).

Khan elaborates on the complexities businesses face:

• Price Increases: Raising prices risks losing customers if the hikes are perceived as excessive.
• Absorbing Costs: Companies might protect their profits by not increasing prices, but this could lead to reduced financial margins, especially for smaller businesses with limited reserves.

She provides examples such as Zuru, a toy manufacturer, which is evaluating each product to determine whether to adjust prices based on competitiveness and consumer psychology. Strategic price points like $9.99 or $19.99 are crucial, as surpassing these thresholds can lead to significant drops in sales (05:23). Additionally, companies like Kimberly Clark are opting to maintain stable prices despite tariff pressures, prioritizing consumer value and market sensitivity (06:19).

3. Foreign Investment and U.S. Asset Confidence

Timestamp: [07:34] - [09:57]

The conversation shifts to the broader implications of tariff adjustments on foreign investment in U.S. assets. Alex Osola introduces John Cendreou, WSJ’s "Heard on the Street" columnist, who discusses the potential risks of capital flight from U.S. treasuries and equities. Cendreou points out that while treasuries are traditionally viewed as safe assets, recent sell-offs indicate growing concerns among foreign investors about the U.S. budget and current account deficits (08:06).

Cendreou explains that the U.S. stock market has become heavily reliant on foreign capital, with foreign ownership of U.S. stocks increasing from 25% to 33% of total market capitalization. He notes, “The US Stock market has ridden this wave of foreign money and it has helped push valuations really high” (08:44). If foreign investors begin to withdraw their investments, it could lead to a drag on U.S. stock performance. However, he also emphasizes that American companies’ strong fundamentals and growth prospects remain attractive, suggesting that the market’s reliance on foreign investment is not a definitive vulnerability but a significant factor to monitor (09:53).

4. Stalled Peace Talks in Ukraine

Timestamp: [10:02] - [11:23]

Adding to the geopolitical discourse, the podcast covers the stalled peace negotiations in Ukraine. Alex Osola reports that the talks aimed at ending the war in Ukraine have reached an impasse, increasing President Trump's frustration. The U.S. administration has criticized Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for not accepting a U.S.-proposed peace plan, which controversially includes the recognition of Russia’s sovereignty over Crimea. The situation was further complicated by the sudden cancellation of key U.S. officials from a crucial meeting in London, signaling deep divisions and the challenges in achieving a resolution (10:02).

5. Breakthrough in Quantum Communication

Timestamp: [11:23] - [12:00]

In the realm of technology, the podcast highlights a groundbreaking advancement in quantum communication. A study published in Nature details a successful transmission of coherent quantum information over 158 miles between two German cities without the need for expensive cryogenic cooling systems. Aylin Woodward, reporting for the Tech News Briefing, explains that this achievement marks a significant step forward in secure communications. Quantum cryptography leverages unique encryption keys that are virtually uncrackable, as they are not based on traditional mathematical formulas but on random strings of data (11:23).

Woodward emphasizes the importance of this development in the context of evolving cyber threats: “Quantum cryptography basically generates a key that isn't based on any math and therefore is, like, virtually uncrackable” (11:23). This innovation promises to enhance data security across various industries, safeguarding against the increasing capabilities of quantum computers to breach conventional encryption methods.

---

Conclusion

The April 23, 2025 episode of WSJ’s What’s News offers a comprehensive overview of critical global developments impacting markets and geopolitical landscapes. From President Trump's strategic considerations to reduce tariffs on Chinese imports and the consequent effects on U.S. businesses and foreign investment, to the complex dynamics of stalled peace talks in Ukraine, and a significant breakthrough in quantum communication technology, the episode provides listeners with rich, timely insights. Featuring expert interviews and detailed analyses, the episode ensures that audiences remain well-informed on the factors driving today's most pressing economic and political issues.

For those who missed the episode, the structured discussions and notable quotes offer a clear and engaging summary, encapsulating the multifaceted aspects of the topics covered.

---

Notable Quotes:

• Alex Osola: “What he's considering right now is a small positive sign for de-escalation, but it doesn't fundamentally change the overall dynamics with China.” (03:45)

• Natasha Khan: “What we're seeing is that this decision of how much or whether to jack up the prices is really as much of an art as it is science.” (05:23)

• John Cendreou: “The US Stock market has ridden this wave of foreign money and it has helped push valuations really high.” (08:44)

• Aylin Woodward: “Quantum cryptography basically generates a key that isn't based on any math and therefore is, like, virtually uncrackable.” (11:23)

Transcript

[Advertiser]

This episode is brought to you by State Farm. You might say all kinds of stuff when things go wrong, but these are the words you really need to remember. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there. They've got options to fit your unique insurance needs, meaning you can talk to your agent to choose the coverage you need, have coverage options to protect the things you value most, file a claim right on the State Farm mobile app, and even reach a real person when you need to talk to someone. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is.

[Co-Host]

There.

[Alex Osola]

President Trump considers reducing the tariffs on Chinese goods in an effort to de escalate the trade war.

[Ling Ling Wei]

What he's considering right now is a small positive sign for de escalation, but it doesn't fundamentally change the overall dynamics with China. But it's the move and now the ball is in China's court.

[Alex Osola]

Plus why even a trade war u turn might not restore confidence in U.S. assets for foreign investors. And President Trump blames Ukrainian President Zelensky for failing to accept a U.S. peace plan. It's Wednesday, April 23rd. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. This is the PM edition of what's News, the top headlines and business stories that move the world Today. We're exclusively reporting that the Trump administration is considering slashing its steep tariffs on Chinese imports in a bid to de escalate tensions with Beijing. That's according to people familiar with the matter. A White House spokesman said that tariff decisions will come directly from the president and that anything else is speculation. Later in the day, Bloomberg News reported that Treasury Secretary Scott Besant told reporters that Trump hasn't offered to take down US Tariffs on China on a unilateral basis. For more, I'm joined by WSJ Chief China correspondent Ling Ling Wei. Ling Ling, you write that President Trump hasn't made up his mind fully about this yet. But what are some of the plans floating around?

[Ling Ling Wei]

For now, nothing has been decided. The administration officials have told us that whatever action the Trump administration takes wouldn't be unilateral. They would also want to see some action from China as well to lower tariffs. So for the Trump administration, at least a couple options are on the table right now. Right now. One involves reducing the current very, very high tariffs of 145% on Chinese imports to between roughly 50% and 65%. Another approach involves adopting a tiered system similar to some legislation proposed by the House Committee on China late last year. Under that approach, the tariffs would be reduced to 35% non strategic products. Basically, things are not considered the threat to US national security and at least 100% tariffs for items deemed strategic to US interests.

[Alex Osola]

What has China said about this? Are they open to these conversations?

[Ling Ling Wei]

China has indicated that they're willing to talk, but they do not want to talk under a lot of pressure. The signaling is being viewed positively in Beijing. Now comes the hard part, how to get the negotiations process started.

[Alex Osola]

Is there any indication that this could ease tensions or be the beginning of easing tensions? Beyond the tariff conversation, President Trump is.

[Ling Ling Wei]

Signaling willingness to de escalate because he clearly is coming under pressure. What he's considering right now is a small positive sign for de escalation, but it doesn't fundamentally change the overall dynamics with China. Even if the tariffs come down to, say, 50, 60%, that still means the U.S. market is largely closed to Chinese exporters. So fundamentally it doesn't change the overall picture, but it's a move. And now the ball is in China's court.

[Alex Osola]

That was WSJ chief China correspondent Ling Ling Wei.

[Ling Ling Wei]

Thanks, Ling Ling, thank you.

[Alex Osola]

A rally in US Stocks continued for a second day after the Trump administration addressed two of the market's biggest concerns by softening its tone on both China and the Federal Reserve. The Dow closed up more than 400 points, or roughly 1.1%. The S&P 500 rose about 1.7%, and the Nasdaq added 2.5%. Businesses tariff problem is rapidly becoming consumers problem Companies across a variety of industries say they're making plans to pass along at least some of the cost of tariffs to consumers. Natasha Khan, who covers business for the Journal, is here to discuss how businesses are going about this. Natasha, just broadly, how are companies thinking about raising prices across these different industries?

[Natasha Khan]

What we're seeing is that this decision of how much or whether to jack up the prices is really as much of an art as it is science. So if you pass along the tariff cost entirely to the customer, you might risk turning them off for periods that could last far beyond this moment. But at the same time, if they swallow the tariffs themselves, they could destroy profits. For example, executives at a toy maker called Zuru told us that they're examining every item I think they have about a Dow items that they import to find a new price point. For some items, it might be more competitive, and if they do raise the price, it may really lose market share to other companies. For others, there's things to consider, like consumer psychology. So numbers like $9.99, $19.99 or $49.99, what people call strategic price barriers. So these are thresholds where if they cross it, consumers are more sensitive and might just make the decision not to buy.

[Alex Osola]

Are there businesses that aren't looking to raise their prices?

[Natasha Khan]

Across the board, we have seen that there are a lot of prices that are still holding steady. The consumer products company Kimberly Clark was saying that they're not really planning to raise prices. People are very concerned about value, they're concerned about pricing. So that's something that companies are really having to make decisions about that balance, especially for smaller companies. That's where it really becomes very complicated because they might not have as much cash flow or cash reserves to suddenly pay such a big cost. So I think that's really something that people are really grappling with.

[Alex Osola]

That was WSJ business reporter Natasha Khan. Thank you, Natasha.

[Natasha Khan]

Thank you.

[Alex Osola]

Coming up, why an apparent 180 on tariffs may still not be enough to reassure foreign investors in US assets? That's after the break.

[Advertiser]

McDonald's meets the Minecraft universe with one of six collectibles and your choice of.

[Alex Osola]

A Big Mac or 10 piece McNuggets.

[Advertiser]

With spicy nether Flame sauce now available with a Minecraft movie meal and participating McDonald's for a limited time, a Minecraft movie only in theaters.

[Alex Osola]

Today. Money came rushing back into equities, bonds and the dollar following news that Washington is considering slashing tariffs on Chinese imports. But concerns about erratic economic policy and the threat to the Federal Reserve's independence won't simply go away. That could make Treasuries and equities more exposed to an exodus of foreign investors. WSJ Heard on the street columnist John Cendreou is here to talk about it. John, so far, concerns about capital flight have focused mainly on the government's debt. What makes investors uneasy about Treasuries?

[Co-Host]

There's a breed of investors that are concerned about how big the budget deficit is and how big the current account deficit is. These concerns are over blown, but generally the fact that there is a sell off in Treasuries at a time when the market is concerned is a bad thing because usually people think of Treasuries as this safe asset that everyone piles into when there's concerns about the global economy. Now we've had this shock of tariffs and the trade war and everybody's thinking the opposite and is thinking, oh my God, I biased my portfolio too much towards the US Even though I am based in Norway or Japan or whatever it is and I should really correct that, right?

[Alex Osola]

So the stock market has, as you write, grown more dependent on foreign money is more at risk here. What could potentially be done about this?

[Co-Host]

The US Stock market has ridden this wave of foreign money and it has helped push valuations really high. The percentage of the US Stock market owned by foreigners, it's gone from about a quarter to a third of the total market capitalization. So clearly there's been this support of foreign enthusiastic buyers who couldn't get these types of returns in the UK or in Europe or in Japan, and they were seeing them in the US we should remember that part of the reason why these returns were higher is because the US Truly has faster growing companies and better companies and that's not going away. So the idea that necessarily the US Stock market has to fall in line with the rest of the stock market around the world is not necessarily true. So there is a certain indication that part of this was foreigners buying. If now they slowly sell, that will have an impact. So I have the impression that it's not the end all be all, but it will definitely be a drag on US Stock performance going forward.

[Alex Osola]

That was WSJ heard on the street columnist John Cendreou. Thank you, John.

[Co-Host]

Thank you.

[Alex Osola]

In other news, talks to end the war in Ukraine are stalled, leaving President Trump increasingly frustrated and blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for fail to accept a U.S. peace plan. A meeting in London today that was billed as a make or break moment for talks fizzled after Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff abruptly canceled plans to attend. That followed Zelensky's pushback against a U.S. proposal for a peace deal that Washington legally recognized Russia's sovereignty over the Crimean peninsula, which Russia has occupied since 2014. In a social media post, Trump criticized Zelensky for his comments, adding that the Ukrainian leader had to choose peace now or risk losing his entire country in three years time. Scientists just took a quantum leap towards more secure communications. In a study published in the journal Nature out today, scientists say they send quantum information across a record breaking 158 miles between two cities in Germany. It's the first time coherent quantum communication, an ultra secure means of transmitting data, has been achieved using existing telecommunications infrastructure without the expensive cryogenic cooling that's typically required, reporter Aylin Woodward told our Tech News Briefing podcast. What makes quantum communication so much more secure today?

[Aylin Woodward]

Our data is protected by encryption keys and these encryption keys are based on algorithms like mathematical formulas that with enough computing power can be broken by like a quantum computer. And these quantum computers are getting better and more powerful. So eventually, it's possible that encryption keys could be broken. But quantum cryptography basically generates a key that isn't based on any math and therefore is, like, virtually uncrackable. We're Talking about a 500 digit string of random values. You can't reverse engineer that.

[Alex Osola]

For more from Aylin, listen to tomorrow's episode of Tech News Briefing. And that's what's news for this Wednesday afternoon. Today's show was produced by Pierre Biennime and Anthony Banci, with supervising producer Michael Kosmides. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning. Thanks for listening.