Loading summary
Dynatrace/NetSuite Announcer
This podcast is brought to you by Dynatrace, the leader in AI Powered Observability. With analytics, automation and next level intelligence on one unified platform, Dynatrace delivers the visibility and real time insights you need to deliver better, more secure software, successful AI initiatives and innovation at the speed of business. Turn data into decisions that drive your business forward with AI powered observability where it counts. Learn more@dynatrace.com WSJ that's www. N a T-R-A c e.com WSJ.
David Wehner
Hey listeners, it's Tuesday, November 4th. I'm David Wehner for the Wall Street Journal, and this is what's News in Earnings. Our look at some of the biggest themes standing out this earnings season in the pharma world. There's Eli Lilly, and then there's pretty much everyone else. Lilly's weight loss powerhouse continues to reshape the industry, with sales of its GLP1 drugs like Zepbound soaring and rivals scrambling to respond to in the latest twist and the sign of just how fierce the new obesity drug arms race has become, the maker of Ozempic, Novo Nordisk, is now trying to snatch away another company in this space, Matsera from Pfizer. At the same time, Pharma's negotiations with President Trump over drug prices and import tariffs are hanging over the sector, testing how companies will deliver growth even as blockbusters like Keytruda from Merck edged toward patent expiration, while others like Humira from Abbvie already have. We're joined by Wall Street Journal reporter Peter Loftus, who's been tracking Pharma for us. Peter, there's a lot of hype baked into this whole GLP1 boom. What did we learn from Eli Lilly's earnings last week? Is this a sustainable growth story or are we in kind of a bubble?
Peter Loftus
Well, we learned from Eli Lilly that when you have a couple of drugs that are in demand because they're so effective for weight loss and diabetes, and when you resolve some supply issues, as Eli Lilly has done, that you can basically print money. Their drug for diabetes, Mounjaro, sales more than doubled and it's on track to become the highest selling drug in the world, Zepbound, which is basically the same drug that nearly tripled in sales and together they've generated billions of dollars in sales. We learned with Eli Lilly's most recent earnings report that this booming growth is not confined to the US Mounjaro. It's rolling out to more countries and much of the demand for it is from people who are willing to pay out of pocket for it in these other countries. If that keeps up, the market's just going to get bigger and bigger. As far as how much of this is sustainable, that's the million dollar question. As these drugs roll out to more and more people, there's going to be more and more pricing pressure that moderates the overall sales growth.
David Wehner
Just as Eli Lilly was reporting earnings, Novo Nordisk was coming in with a out of nowhere aggressive bid to essentially snatch away MTSERA from Pfizer. What is going on here? What is Pfizer doing to respond?
Peter Loftus
Pfizer is not sitting back and taking this. They've already filed a couple legal moves to try to force Metsehra to honor the terms of their original merger agreement and it's turned into this juicy or contentious takeover battle that we haven't seen in Biopharma for a while.
David Wehner
It's interesting that Pfizer in its recent press release flagged the fact that Nova was trying to snatch away this acquisition from an American company. And Albert Bourle, Pfizer's CEO, was the first one to stand in the White House alongside President Trump and announced a deal on the drug pricing plan. What do you make of the stage we're in now with the drug pricing discussions and the tariffs?
Peter Loftus
The Pfizer deal in September led to a lot of relief in the sense that while on its face it looked like Pfizer was making a lot of concessions on prices in the US when you look at the details, the impact is more limited in scope than it might seem. So it's limited to reduced prices in Medicaid, where most companies already sell at a discount. And through this direct purchase model, including Trump rx, investors and analysts see that as having less of an impact than it might seem that there'd be a small audience for that way of buying. And a couple more companies have followed with their own announcements and there's the expectation that eventually more will directly it's led to increases in these companies stock prices. Companies seem to be getting protection from any new tariffs down the line and we'll see over time whether some of these discounts do add up to a big impact, at least for certain companies.
David Wehner
Yeah, we're still waiting for Eli Lilly, for instance, the best performing company. Have they mentioned anything during their earnings call or are they going to roll out some heavily discounted Zeppelin or Manjaro?
Peter Loftus
Lilly and other companies during their earnings calls have at least alluded to still being in discussions with the administration on these kinds of deals. They haven't been so specific in tipping their hand about what elements they're going to agree to. There's a general expectation that they're going to make similar concessions to what Pfizer and AstraZeneca have done in exchange for protection from tariffs.
David Wehner
Now, Besides the whole GLP1 boom, weight loss is such a massive category in pharma. There are tons of other very important categories that are driving earnings and affecting big shares like Merck, abbvie, many of which are facing patent cliffs. Their drugs either lost patent exclusivity recently or will how are some of these companies preparing for life after patent exclusivity goes down for some of their major drugs?
Peter Loftus
Some of the companies have become more aggressive in deal making. They've been making decent sized acquisitions and they're basically looking for drugs developed by other people to restock the pipeline or even drugs that are already on the market that can generate the sales that will hopefully offset and even exceed maybe the sales lost from their current blockbusters when they face patent expirations. So acquisitions are a big way. They're doing it. Even just continued in house R and D, introducing new drugs that treat some of the similar conditions to the older ones that lost patent protection. Like with Abbvie. They have a newer drug called Skyrizi that's on the rise and they see that as a way to really cushion the impact of losing patent protection for Humira and just had booming sales this past quarter. Some of companies have cut costs to get ready for this patent cliff like Bristol Myers and Merck. And so there's a variety of ways that they're all trying to weather this patten cliff. We'll see in the coming years who has the right strategy.
David Wehner
Thanks for joining, Peter. This has been a great conversation.
Peter Loftus
My pleasure. I enjoyed it.
David Wehner
And that was what's news in earnings. Today's show was produced by Zoe Kulkin and Michael Laval with deputy editor Chris Zinsley. Later today we'll have the PM edition of what's News out for your as usual. And we'll be back later this earnings season diving into another industry. Until then, I'm David Wehner. Have a great day.
Dynatrace/NetSuite Announcer
Tariff and trade policies are dynamic, supply chains squeezed and cash flow tighter than ever. You need total visibility from global shipments to tariff impacts to real time cash flow. That's NetSuite by Oracle, your AI powered business management suite. Trusted by over 42,000 businesses, NetSuite brings accounting, financial management, inventory and HR into one suite to help you know what's stuck, what it's costing you, and how to pivot fast. If your revenues are at least in the seven figures, download the free ebook Navigating Global 3 Insights for Leaders at netsuite.com wallstreet.
Date: November 4, 2025
Host: David Wehner
Guest: Peter Loftus (WSJ Pharma Reporter)
This episode dives into the evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, spotlighting the transformative impact of GLP-1 weight loss drugs like Mounjaro and Zepbound. As Eli Lilly surges ahead with record-breaking earnings, competitors scramble to respond—most notably, Novo Nordisk and Pfizer are engaged in a dramatic acquisition fight. The discussion extends to how traditional pharmaceutical giants are coping with looming patent expirations, and what the latest moves in drug pricing and tariffs under President Trump mean for the industry’s future.
Peter Loftus on Lily’s Market Power [01:46]:
“When you have a couple of drugs that are in demand because they’re so effective for weight loss and diabetes, and when you resolve some supply issues, as Eli Lilly has done, that you can basically print money.”
On Out-of-Pocket Growth Abroad [02:32]:
“Much of the demand for it is from people who are willing to pay out of pocket for it in these other countries. If that keeps up, the market’s just going to get bigger and bigger.”
On Market Realities of Price Concessions [03:51]:
“The impact is more limited in scope than it might seem…through this direct purchase model, including Trump rx, investors and analysts see that as having less of an impact than it might seem.”
On Threats and Change [05:56]:
“Acquisitions are a big way they’re doing it...Some companies have cut costs to get ready for this patent cliff like Bristol Myers and Merck. And so there’s a variety of ways that they’re all trying to weather this patent cliff.”
The episode maintains the WSJ’s clear, analytical, and slightly urgent tone, reflecting the high stakes and rapid developments in the pharmaceutical industry. Comments are factual but often laced with a sense of drama, especially regarding high-profile corporate maneuvering and the “arms race” for market-defining drugs.
A must-listen episode for investors, industry watchers, and anyone interested in how a few revolutionary drugs can reshape a sector—and the battles raging to control the profits and risks that come with them.