Transcript
Abercrombie Denim Advertiser (0:00)
Abercrombie Denim is everything right now. Denim should feel like this. Confident, easy, like your butt has never looked better. If you didn't know Abercrombie's Curve Love Denim went viral in 2019 for eliminating waist gap, and it's still a game changer. Between that and their classic fits with a straighter line from waist to hip, the perfect denim does exist. Shop Abercrombie Denim in the app, online and in store.
Sabrina Siddiqui (0:31)
An appeals court throws out a $500 million civil fraud penalty against President Trump. Plus, more U.S. companies plan to slow hiring in the second half of 2025.
Ray Smith (0:43)
Companies are saying there's a lot of economic uncertainty out there. You've got this perfect storm of changes this year that has just made them a lot more cautious.
Sabrina Siddiqui (0:51)
And U.S. home sales unexpectedly rose 2% in July. It's Thursday, August 21st. I'm Sabrina Sidi Key for the Wall Street Journal, covering for Alex Oslo. This is the PM of what's the top headlines and business stories that move the world today. An appeals court threw out a more than $500 million judgment against President Trump and his business empire, paving the way for further proceedings before New York's highest court. Today's decision from a five judge panel provides a significant legal boost for Trump in a case that was brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in 2022. Wall Street Journal reporter Corinne Ramey joins me now with the latest. Corrine this was a sharply divided ruling. What did the justices say?
Corinne Ramey (1:42)
So the justices threw out this massive penalty, this $500 million judgment against Trump, but the rest of it was pretty complicated. There were three opinions from this court and the justices essentially did not reach a majority. And so they were divided on these various issues. What they did find, though, was that Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the case, was within her author in bringing the case under this broad fraud statute. And they also upheld some business restrictions that the trial judge had imposed on Trump, including restrictions that could make it difficult for Trump's company to borrow money and bar Trump's two eldest sons from running a company in New York State for two years. The way this court ruled on this was highly unusual. Normally the justices agree, and this was about as far from agreement as I've ever seen was more than 300 pages of the justices writing about the things they disagreed about.
Sabrina Siddiqui (2:44)
How did President Trump react to the decision? And what did we hear from Letitia James?
