Why Venezuela Bonds Are Rallying After Maduro’s Ouster

Summary

WSJ What’s News – “Why Venezuela Bonds Are Rallying After Maduro’s Ouster”

Date: January 6, 2026
Host: Alex Osola (for The Wall Street Journal)

---

Episode Overview

This episode covers the seismic political and financial developments following the U.S.-led military operation that resulted in the ouster of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro. The show focuses on why investors in Venezuela’s long-distressed government bonds are seeing a huge rally, the hesitations of the U.S. oil industry to re-engage in Venezuela despite regime change, and touches on shifting global alliances amid unconventional U.S. foreign policy proposals. Featured WSJ reporters Colin Eaton and Matt Wirtz provide in-depth analysis of how Venezuela's volatile politics are moving financial markets and reshaping energy industry prospects.

---

Key Discussion Points and Insights

1. U.S. Political Fallout: Greenland and Global Alliances

• President Trump's Greenland Proposal:
  The episode opens with discussion of President Trump reigniting his controversial proposal for the U.S. to take over Greenland, alarming allies and U.S. lawmakers alike.
  • Alex Osola: “After the military raid on Venezuela, President Trump has once again raised the idea of the U.S. taking over Greenland, and that's causing alarm...” [00:46-01:00]
  • Global Reaction: Denmark, which administers Greenland, warns that U.S. military action would threaten the NATO alliance, echoing unease among European allies.
  • Stephen Miller (White House aide): “Nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.” [01:28]
  • U.S. Legislative Response: Republican lawmakers voice skepticism, with some criticizing the appropriateness and likelihood of Greenland annexation.

2. Venezuela Regime Change: Impact on Oil Industry

• Oil as a Driving Force:
  Trump’s hints to oil executives pre-operation underscore that oil is central to U.S. interests in Venezuela.
  • Alex Osola: “He told them to get ready. It’s an indication of how central oil is to his decision to go into Venezuela...” [01:43-02:11]
• American Oil Companies’ Reluctance:
  WSJ oil reporter Colin Eaton analyzes why U.S. oil majors, notably Chevron, are not rushing to expand operations in Venezuela.
  • Colin Eaton: “The oil and gas industry in Venezuela has become central to its economy and it's been in a dilapidated state... For these companies to go back into Venezuela or go into it, removing Maduro was necessary but not sufficient.” [02:47-03:56, 04:38-05:08]
    • Key Obstacles:
      • Venezuela’s constitution restricts foreign ownership in oil projects.
      • History of expropriations (notably under Hugo Chávez in 2007).
      • Desire for assurances on long-term political and regulatory stability.
    • Industry Response:
      • Chevron has no plans to boost Venezuela spending for now.
      • ConocoPhillips calls it “premature” to discuss investment.
      • Exxon did not comment.
  • Colin Eaton: “Companies that have operated in Venezuela have been burned before... They’ve been injured and aren’t rushing to get back in.” [04:13-04:29]

3. The Venezuelan Bond Rally

• Bond Market Surge:
  WSJ credit reporter Matt Wirtz explains how prices of Venezuela’s defaulted bonds have soared 25-35% since Maduro’s ouster, driven by optimism over possible debt negotiations.
  • Matt Wirtz: “They traded up, but then they stopped in the high 30s, mid-40s. And that’s based on the expectation that whatever administration ends up taking power will eventually start negotiating again with bondholders.” [06:31-07:13]
• Cautious Optimism:
  • Investors hope for meaningful restructuring talks as a new government forms, but experts expect slow, “messy” progress.
    • Matt Wirtz: “For that to happen, you need to have a government that's relatively stable... Even in a relatively straightforward restructuring... it can take several years.” [07:29-07:47]
    • He warns: “Newsflash, no one's going to get the full amount that they put in.” [07:26-08:00]
• Who Wins?
  • Some investors who bought bonds at deep discounts are starting to sell and take profits, but sudden liquidations could depress prices again.
  • Matt Wirtz: “It’s not like they can cash out right now, but they can take some of their risk off the table. And that’s what we’re seeing.” [08:17-08:44]

4. Broader Global and Market Context

• Stock Market Update:
  • Dow hits a new record, closing above 49,000 (+1%), S&P and Nasdaq also up. [08:52]
  • AIG stock drops after CEO resigns; Ford stock rises on strong sales.
  • Commodities rally, with new records in copper and silver.
• International Affairs:
  • The death of Rep. Doug Lamalfa narrows the GOP majority.
  • Ongoing unrest in Iran, with mass protests and crackdown; Trump signals U.S. support for protesters. [09:43-10:25]

---

Notable Quotes and Memorable Moments

• On U.S. Attitude Toward Greenland:
  Stephen Miller: “There’s no need to even think or talk about this in the context that you’re asking of a military operation. Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.” [01:28]
• On Oil Investment Risks in Venezuela:
  Colin Eaton: “Removing Maduro was necessary, but not necessarily sufficient... Companies that have operated in Venezuela have been burned before... and aren’t rushing to get back in.” [04:38-04:53]
• On Potential Bondholder Recovery:
  Matt Wirtz: “Newsflash, no one's going to get the full amount that they put in.” [07:26-08:00]
• On Market Sentiment:
  Matt Wirtz: “It’s not like they can cash out right now, but they can take some of their risk off the table. And that’s what we’re seeing.” [08:17-08:44]

---

Key Timestamps

• 00:46: Trump’s renewed Greenland proposal and global/NATO response
• 01:43: The U.S. “get ready” signal to oil companies before Venezuela operation
• 02:47-05:08: Colin Eaton—why U.S. oil firms are cautious about new Venezuela investments
• 06:31: Matt Wirtz—Venezuela bond rally and what’s driving it
• 07:29-08:10: What must happen for bond negotiations to start; “messy” road ahead
• 08:17: Prospects for bondholders’ payday (and its limitations)
• 08:52: Summary of market movements, breaking political and international news

---

Summary

This episode succinctly lays out how the removal of Maduro has energized financial markets—especially for distressed Venezuelan bonds—but that neither bondholders nor the U.S. oil industry should expect windfalls or easy opportunities. Political stability, not just regime change, will be key to unlocking Venezuela’s economic potential and attracting lasting foreign capital. Meanwhile, erratic U.S. foreign policy moves—like floating the idea of annexing Greenland—are causing turbulence among allies. As bond prices surge, experts caution that true recovery in Venezuela, both economic and political, is likely to be a protracted and challenging process.

For investors, oil watchers, and followers of global politics, this episode is an essential primer on the intertwined forces driving the next chapter for Venezuela—and the broader geopolitical tremors they’re sending through markets.

Transcript

[TradeSmart Host]

You're about to make a trade. Which u do you listen to? Is it get optioning those options or let's do a little research. Learn [e-mail] TradeSmart.

[Alex Osola]

Some European allies and Republican lawmakers are pushing back on President Trump's idea of taking over Greenland. Plus, after a long time out in the cold, investors in distressed Venezuelan bonds may finally be a step closer to a payday.

[Matt Wirtz]

One of the big things that's going to have to happen is a forensic experiment where there'll be a look at how much debt is out there, who is it owed to, and then who gets what. But you know, newsflash, no one's going to get the full amount that they put in.

[Alex Osola]

And why Removing Maduro may not be enough to attract the U.S. oil industry to Venezuela. It's Tuesday, January 6th. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. This is the PM edition of what's news, the top headlines and business stories that move the world. Today. After the military raid on Venezuela, President Trump has once again raised the idea of the U.S. taking over Greenland, and that's causing alarm for some U.S. lawmakers and allies. The president said on Sunday that U.S. national security required American control of the territory. And yesterday on cnn, senior White House aide Stephen Miller was asked about whether the US Would take military action against Greenland.

[Stephen Miller]

The United States should have Greenland as part of the United States. There's no need to even think or talk about this in the context that you're asking of a military operation. Nobody's going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland.

[Alex Osola]

Greenland's a Danish territory, And Denmark says U.S. military intervention there would mean the end of NATO. And today, Major European allies in NATO called on the US to choose cooperation and not coercion. On Capitol Hill, meanwhile, some Republicans who have supported the Venezuela mission said that talk of taking over Greenland was inappropriate. Others said they weren't sure if Trump was serious, but didn't think an annexation of Greenland would happen. About a month before the US Operation that captured Nicolas Maduro, President Trump hinted to a few American oil executives that something was coming. He he told them to get ready. It's an indication of how central oil is to his decision to go into Venezuela, as well as his close ties to the industry. I'm joined now by Colin Eaton, who covers American oil companies for the Journal. Colin Yesterday, White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said that Trump was looking forward to working with American oil companies on new investments and opportunities in Venezuela. Why is the Trump administration pushing this. What is its goal?

[Colin Eaton]

Well, the oil and gas industry in Venezuela has become central to its economy and it's been in a dilapidated state over the past two decades. The reason that Trump wants to bring it back, he's talked about lowering oil prices here in the States. But there's also the ancillary effects of the improvement in Venezuela's economy can sort of stem the flow of migrants from Venezuela to the US that's been a priority for the Trump administration. Clearly, Venezuela has a ton of oil. The joint venture assets that Chevron is a part of in Venezuela have a lot of oil underneath them, which is a key reason why Chevron has stayed in the country.

[Alex Osola]

Yesterday, investors seemed excited by the potential for other companies to join Chevron and operate in Venezuela. But these companies haven't announced any plans to do so yet. You write that people familiar with the matter say Chevron has no plans to increase spending in Venezuela. That ConocoPhillips says it's premature to speculate on new investment. And Exxon didn't respond to requests for comment.

[Colin Eaton]

So equity investors did interpret this as a opportunity for companies to have a new oil frontier. The issue is there are a lot of details that need to be hammered out. The Constitution, Venezuela does not allow for any foreign entities to have a majority stake in a project like the ones that Chevron runs. And oil companies want to see more long term stability. Companies that have operated in Venezuela have been burned before at assets nationalized in 2007 under Hugo Chavez. They've been injured and aren't rushing to get back in. My understanding is that for these companies to go back into Venezuela or go into it, removing Maduro was necessary, but not necessarily sufficient. The Trump administration knows it's a high stakes gambit here and so they're going to do what they can to persuade companies to put American dollars to work in the country. How that goes is going to be in the hands of the oil industry from this point.

[Alex Osola]

That was WSJ reporter Colin Eaton. Thank you, Colin.

[Colin Eaton]

Thank you.

[Alex Osola]

Coming up, another record setting day for US Markets and why investors holding Venezuelan bonds could soon score a payday. That's after the break.

[Gunjan Banerjee]

Hi, this is Gunjan Banerjee and this is Telus Demos.

[WSJ Take on the Week Host]

We're reporters at the Wall Street Journal and The hosts of WSJ's take on the Week.

[Gunjan Banerjee]

Take on the Week is a weekly show that gives listeners a leg up in the world of markets and investing.

[WSJ Take on the Week Host]

From the Fed's moves to market bubbles. We dive into the biggest deals, key players and business news ahead.

[Gunjan Banerjee]

If you're looking for more news and tools that can help you navigate the markets, consider becoming a subscriber to the Wall street journal.

[WSJ Take on the Week Host]

Visit subscribe.WSJ.comtakeontheweek to subscribe.

[Alex Osola]

It's not just oil companies. Another group of people that stands to benefit from Maduro's ouster are bond investors who spent years betting on a Venezuelan comeback. Though many investors sold off their Venezuelan bonds after the first Trump administration sanctioned the country, some longtime investors have held on for years, hoping for a payday. I'm joined now by Matt Wirtz, who covers credit for the Journal. Matt, walk us through how the prices on Venezuelan bonds have changed in the days since the operation to remove Maduro.

[Matt Wirtz]

Well, in short, they're up. They're up a lot, roughly 25 to 30, 35% in some cases. Venezuela used to be one of the biggest issuers of debt in the emerging markets. All the big banks on Wall street used to do deals for Venezuela and for Venezuela's state owned oil company, which goes by the acronym pdvesa. All these bonds don't trade anywhere near their full face value because they're in default. So they were trading anywhere between 25, 26 cents on the dollar and some of them on the high end in the high 20s. And then after the operation to remove Maduro, they traded up, but then they stopped in the high 30s, mid-40s. And that's based on the expectation that whatever administration ends up taking power will eventually start negotiating again with bondholders.

[Alex Osola]

What will it take for those negotiations to start?

[Matt Wirtz]

So for that to happen, you need to have a government that's relatively stable. Nobody that I talk to expects that to happen anytime soon, maybe this year, but in the later half of the year. And then once that starts, it can be a very long, messy process. Even in a relatively straightforward restructuring, which this is not, it can take several years just because the bond prices have moved up. That's based on an expectation that now we might have finally someone who's willing to play ball and try to restructure. There'll be a look at how much debt is out there, who is it owed to, and then who gets what? But newsflash, no one's going to get the full amount that they put in.

[Alex Osola]

So let's say some of these big bondholders did decide to cash in these bonds. Now what kind of payday could they actually see?

[Matt Wirtz]

I mean, some of them have. So some of these funds they paid close to 100 cents on the dollar, but that was many years ago. So they've written that off. And at this point, anything they make is a gain. So some of them are starting to sell. However, if they were to try to liquidate their position all at once, it would tank the value of the bonds again. So it's not like they can cash out right now, but they can take some of their risk off the table. And that's what we're seeing. There's been a lot of trading over the last couple days.

[Alex Osola]

That was WSJ reporter Matt Wirtz. Thank you, Matt.

[Matt Wirtz]

All right. Thanks, Alex.

[Alex Osola]

In markets, the Dow and S and P hit new records, with the Dow rising 1% to close above 49,000. The Nasdaq ended up 0.7%. Shares in insurer AIG fell 7.5% today on news of its CEO stepping down, while ford shares gained 2 1/2% after it posted stronger U.S. sales in the fourth quarter. In commodities, the rally continued in copper and silver, which also hit new records. In Congress, Republican Representative Doug Lamalfa, who represented a district in Northern California for 13 years, has died. His death shrinks Republicans House majority to 218 seats versus Democrats 213. And unrest in Iran extended into a second week with a heavy police response today to a protest in the Tehran Grand Bazaar, the city's central market. Protests began over difficult economic conditions, but have taken a political turn, with students and others chanting slogans against the regime. The group Human Rights Activists in Iran say more than a thousand people have been arrested and at least 29 killed. And President Trump late last week said the U.S. would come to the aid of Iranian protesters if authorities started shooting them. And that's what's news for this Tuesday afternoon. Today's show is produced by Pierre Biennime with supervising producer Tali Arbel. I'm Alex Osola for the Wall Street Journal. We'll be back with a new show tomorrow morning. Thanks for listening.